Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma

ISSN: 1936-1521 (Print) 1936-153X (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/wcat20

Traumatic Loss in Children and Adolescents

Anthony P. Mannarino & Judith A. Cohen

To cite this article: Anthony P. Mannarino & Judith A. Cohen (2011) Traumatic Loss
in Children and Adolescents, Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 4:1, 22-33, DOI:
10.1080/19361521.2011.545048

To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/19361521.2011.545048

Published online: 08 Feb 2011.

Submit your article to this journal

Article views: 35888

View related articles

Citing articles: 9 View citing articles

Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at

https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=wcat20
Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 4:22–33, 2011
Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN: 1936-1521 print / 1936-153X online
DOI: 10.1080/19361521.2011.545048

Traumatic Loss in Children and Adolescents

ANTHONY P. MANNARINO AND JUDITH A. COHEN

Allegheny General Hospital

Although different types of childhood trauma have many common characteristics and
mental health outcomes, traumatic loss in children and adolescents has a number of dis-
tinctive features. Most importantly, youth who experience a traumatic loss may develop
childhood traumatic grief (CTG), which is the encroachment of trauma symptoms on
the grieving process and prevents the child from negotiating the typical steps associated
with normal bereavement. This article discusses the distinctive features of CTG, how
it is different from normal bereavement, how this condition is assessed, and promising
treatments for children who experience a traumatic loss.

Keywords grief, loss, trauma, children, adolescents

Epidemiologic studies indicate that the majority of children in the United States have
experienced exposure to potentially traumatic events (PTEs). A recent population study
(Copeland, Keeler, Angold, & Costello, 2007) found that 68% of surveyed children had
experienced at least one PTE and more than half had experienced multiple traumas.
Another study (Lipschitz, Rasmussen, Anyan, Cromwell, & Southwick, 2000) similarly
documented that over 90% of children seen in an inner city pediatric clinic had expe-
rienced traumatic exposure. Although most children are resilient after trauma exposure,
others develop significant mental health problems including symptoms of posttraumatic
stress disorder (PTSD), depression, anxiety, behavior problems, substance use disorder,
and physical health problems. As many as 25% of children have significant PTSD symp-
toms following exposure to a PTE (Lipschitz et al., 2000), suggesting that this disorder
alone is a serious public health problem. The Adverse Childhood Experiences Study (Felitti
et al., 1998) demonstrated that traumatic experiences during childhood confer significantly
increased risk for many of the leading cases of early death in adulthood. Thus, youth in the
United States are in need of prompt identification and effective intervention for symptoms
related to trauma exposure.
Until the present time, child trauma treatments have been developed and tested for
specific traumatic experiences, so-called silo treatments (e.g., for child sexual abuse, com-
munity violence, domestic violence, war). However, the great majority of children in
all of these studies have experienced multiple types of traumas (e.g., Cohen, Deblinger,
Mannarino, & Steer, 2004; Lieberman, Van Horn, & Ippen, 2005; Stein et al., 2003),
thereby suggesting that studies of children affected by distinct types of trauma may, in fact,
be evaluating and treating largely overlapping populations. Moreover, Saunders (2003)
proposed that treatments that successfully target PTSD and other symptoms in children
experiencing one type of trauma are likely to successfully treat children who have the
Submitted August 28, 2009; revised March 19, 2010; accepted September 14, 2010.
Address correspondence to Anthony P. Mannarino, Department of Psychiatry, Allegheny
General Hospital, Four Allegheny Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15212. E-mail: amannari@wpahs.org

22
 Traumatic Loss in Children and Adolescents 23

same symptoms related to another type of traumatic event. In a nationally representative

sample of youth, Finkelhor, Ormrod, Turner, and Hamby (2005) documented that mul-
tiple types of victimization or “polyvictimization” predicted the highest rates of trauma
symptoms. These findings implied that the negative mental health sequelae from child-
hood trauma may primarily be the result of the cumulative impact of polyvictimization
rather than exposure to any specific type of trauma. These results provide additional sup-
port for conceptualizing traumatized children as having significant similarities regardless
of their specific types of victimization and traumatic experiences. Such a conceptualization
seems warranted given that the previously mentioned treatment outcome studies indicate
that most treated children have experienced multiple traumas.
Despite the conclusions from the previously mentioned research and the commonali-
ties across different types of childhood trauma, children and adolescents who lose a family
member, other loved one, or significant other through traumatic circumstances clearly face
unique challenges. In addition to dealing with the traumatic event (e.g., act of terrorism,
natural disaster, homicide, suicide, automobile accident), children and adolescents are also
confronted with the sadness, grief, and loss associated with no longer having their fam-
ily member or loved one in their life. Moreover, it is this combination of traumatic stress
and loss that uniquely characterizes childhood traumatic grief (CTG) but that has also
posed challenges to researchers and clinicians alike in terms of definitional issues, clinical
description, and treatment.
This article examines traumatic loss in children and adolescents. Epidemiologic, def-
initional, conceptual, and assessment issues are discussed as well as current ideas about
treatment for this population.

Differentiating Normal Bereavement From CTG

Many children lose a close significant other to death during childhood. It is estimated
that 400,000 youth younger than age 25 will experience the death of a family member each
year. Also, current statistics indicate that 1.9 million children younger than age 18 have lost
one or both parents (Children’s Bereavement Center of South Texas, 2008). Accordingly,
many children have some experience with bereavement as they are growing up (Cohen &
Mannarino, 2010).
In the lay literature and sometimes in the professional literature as well, the terms
bereavement and grief are used interchangeably, but for the purposes of this article, we
propose different definitions. Bereavement is the condition of having had a significant
other die. In contrast, grief is the intense emotion and pain that one feels on having a
significant other die. Uncomplicated bereavement in children and adolescents may resem-
ble clinical depression in many ways, with youth experiencing intense sadness or grief,
crying, not wanting to spend time with friends or classmates, loss of appetite, sleep dif-
ficulties, decline in academic performance, and/or lack of interest in normal activities.
Younger children may search for the deceased person or ask questions about what has
happened to this person. Like adults, children may experience “pangs” of grief, which are
sudden intense waves of painful feelings of loss that can seemingly come from nowhere,
although, unlike adults, children may display these symptoms or behaviors more intermit-
tently. Even soon after a loss, children may be observed playing or laughing, which can be
confusing and perhaps disturbing to adults whose grief may be more constant. The inter-
mittent nature of children’s grief responses is characteristic of children’s general affective
states in general, which are often more changeable and reactive than those of adults (Cohen
& Mannarino, 2010).
24 A. P. Mannarino and J. A. Cohen

After a death, children are confronted with the reality of going forward with their
lives without their loved one. Wolfelt (1996) used the term “reconciliation” to describe this
process. Childhood bereavement experts (Wolfelt, 1996; Worden, 1996) have identified a
number of tasks as significant in the reconciliation process, including accepting the reality
of the loss; fully experiencing the emotional distress of the loss; adjusting to one’s environ-
ment and sense of self without the loved one; finding meaning in the loved one’s death; and
becoming engaged with other adults who can provide ongoing comfort, security, and nurtu-
rance. These tasks require children to tolerate sustained thoughts about the deceased loved
one and their past interactions with the deceased and to face and bear the pain associated
with the loss. It is important to note that children can experience intensely painful nor-
mal grief reactions that may include great sadness, periods of crying, and withdrawal from
peers and activities. Nonetheless, these normal grief reactions are not the same as traumatic
grief, and clinicians and researchers are faced with the challenge of distinguishing between
them. As discussed later, children with traumatic grief are unable to complete the tasks of
reconciliation because remembering the loved one typically serves as a trauma reminder,
with the subsequent development of trauma symptoms (Cohen & Mannarino, 2004).
CTG has been described as a condition in which children whose loved ones die under
traumatic circumstances develop trauma symptoms that impinge on the children’s ability to
progress through typical grief processes (Cohen, Mannarino, Greenberg, Padlo, & Shipley,
2002; Layne et al., 2001). As discussed elsewhere (Cohen & Mannarino, 2006), these
children get “stuck” on the traumatic aspects of their loved ones death such that when they
start to remember their loved one, including happy memories, their memories tend to segue
into thoughts about the terrifying or horrific manner in which the person died. When this
process occurs, children begin to avoid reminiscing about the loved one and may avoid any
reminders about the deceased because of the propensity of these reminders to stimulate the
children’s painful trauma memories.
CTG is different from uncomplicated bereavement in several ways. First, the nature
of the death is often (but not always) qualitatively different in cases of CTG, with these
deaths typically being from sudden, unexpected, tragic, and/or violent causes such as
suicide, homicide, accidents, war, terrorism, and disasters. When CTG results after med-
ical deaths, the medical causes are often from sudden conditions such as heart attacks or
strokes. However, CTG can also result from chronic medical conditions because children
may not anticipate or comprehend that their loved one was going to die. Accordingly,
for these children, the death may be unexpected and sudden. In a parallel way, deaths
from anticipated causes can be extremely disturbing to children if they observe fright-
ening events such as their loved one gasping for air, frantic attempts at resuscitation, or
severe bodily deterioration. Thus, any cause of death can lead to CTG as long as the child
subjectively experiences it as traumatic (Cohen & Mannarino, 2010).
Another way that CTG is different from normal bereavement is with regard to the
presence and severity of PTSD symptoms. Some PTSD symptoms, including sleep diffi-
culties, loss of interest in peer and other social activities, and trouble concentrating, can
normally be expected in bereaved children. However, core PTSD symptoms such as intru-
sive re-experiencing of the deceased’s death, persistent avoidance of death reminders or
even avoidance of reminders of the loved one, and hyperarousal as manifested through
angry outbursts or hypervigilence are less typical of uncomplicated bereavement but very
characteristic of CTG (Cohen & Mannarino, 2010).
It is important to recognize that developing CTG is not the norm for children who
lose loved ones, even if the cause of death is objectively traumatic. A good example of
the nonnormative nature of CTG is a study by Pfefferbaum and colleagues (1999) who
 Traumatic Loss in Children and Adolescents 25

studied children who were directly affected by the bombing of the federal office building
in Oklahoma City in 1995. Specifically, they reported that although PTSD was significantly
associated with the loss of a loved one and the closeness of the relationship to the deceased,
the majority of children who lost loved ones did not report elevated PTSD symptoms or
functional impairment 7 weeks after the bombing (Pfefferbaum et al., 1999).
Another study with similar findings was reported by Brent et al. (1995). In a study
of adolescents who had friends who committed suicide, only 5% of these adolescents
reported persistent PTSD symptoms (Brent, Perper, & Moritz, 1993; Brent et al., 1995).
In another study by this same research group, siblings of adolescents who had commit-
ted suicide did not demonstrate an increased incidence of PTSD symptoms compared to a
control group who had not been exposed to suicide, despite the former group having pro-
longed grief symptoms (Brent, Moritz, Bridge, Perper, & Canobbio, 1996a, 1996b). Thus,
it appears that the majority of children who lose loved ones under traumatic circumstances
do not develop CTG, and development of persistent PTSD symptoms that intrude on chil-
dren’s ability to grieve should not be viewed as normative for such children (Cohen &
Mannarino, 2004).

Core Features of CTG

With many childhood traumas, such as sexual abuse, physical abuse, or domestic violence
in which no death has occurred, there can be numerous types of mental health sequelae,
including PTSD symptoms, other anxiety problems, depression, and ongoing behavioral
difficulties. Although children and adolescents who experience a traumatic loss may dis-
play a variety of symptoms and problems, being “stuck” on the traumatic aspects of the
loved one’s death is the essence of CTG as we currently understand it.
PTSD symptoms associated with CTG may include recurrent upsetting and intrusive
thoughts or dreams of the traumatic event that led to the loved one’s death or even a sense
of the event happening over again. Additionally, children may have intense physiological
reactivity or psychological distress in response to reminders of the traumatic cause of death
(e.g., “traumatic reminders”; Pynoos, 1992).
Avoidance or numbing symptoms may include efforts to avoid thoughts, feelings, or
conversations about the death or people, places, or situations that remind them of the trau-
matic cause of death. Children with CTG may also experience a diminished interest in
normal activities, feeling emotionally distant or detached from others, a restricted affective
range, or a sense of a foreshortened future. Hyperarousal symptoms may include sleep dis-
turbance, irritability or angry outbursts, decreased concentration, increased startle reaction,
or hypervigilance (American Psychiatric Association, 2000).
It is worth noting that children who suffer from CTG have some degree of func-
tional impairment (Cohen & Mannarino, 2010). This impairment may be manifested
through declining academic performance, increased difficulty in relating to peers or family
members, or general struggles with everyday tasks such as homework and routine chores.
In CTG, intrusive and disturbing trauma-related thoughts, images, and memories may
be triggered by at least three types of reminders, as described by Pynoos (1992). “Trauma
reminders” are situations, people, places, sights, smells, or sounds that remind the child
of the traumatic nature of the death. For example, storm clouds, thunder and lightning, or
hurricane warnings may be trauma reminders for children whose loved one died during
Hurricane Katrina. “Loss reminders” are people, places, objects, thoughts, or memories
that remind the child of the deceased loved one. A loved one’s birthday or seeing pictures
of their loved one may be loss reminders for these children. “Change reminders” are sit-
uations, people, places, or things that remind the child of changes in living circumstances
26 A. P. Mannarino and J. A. Cohen

caused by the traumatic death. Attending a new school or having one’s aunt attend a class
play instead of one’s mother who died may be change reminders for these children (Cohen
& Mannarino, 2004).
In CTG, trauma reminders, loss reminders, and change reminders may all segue into
memories, thoughts, and images of the traumatic nature of the loved one’s death and may
be accompanied by physiological symptoms of hyperarousal. To illustrate, when a child
whose sister committed suicide in her bedroom at the family’s residence enters her bed-
room (a trauma reminder), he or she may have intrusive images of the sister lying on the
floor in a pool of blood and experience heart palpitations and intense anxiety (i.e., PTSD
re-experiencing and hyperarousal symptoms). The distress that such children experience
on exposure to trauma, loss, or change reminders leads them to try to avoid such exposure
in order to minimize their distress. For example, the child described previously may refuse
to enter the sister’s bedroom or even experience significant distress when he or she is on
the same floor as the sister’s room. Such avoidance may result in these children having less
exposure to trauma, loss, or change reminders or at least reduce their intensity (Cohen &
Mannarino, 2004).
However, when children have lost a loved one, these reminders are typically ubiquitous
and usually impossible to totally avoid. Some children may develop emotional numbing to
cope with those unavoidable or uncontrollable reminders. Numbing may take the form
of extreme detachment or estrangement in which children feel different and set apart and
alienated from others, even those in his or her own family or circle of friends who may
have experienced the same traumatic loss (Nader, 1997).
For children with traumatic grief, even thinking about happy times with their loved
one leads to thoughts, memories, and emotions related to the traumatic nature of the per-
son’s death. This, in turn, sets off the cascade of reactions described previously in which
reminiscing about the loved one leads to thoughts of the horrible way in which the person
died and which then results in PTSD symptoms (re-experiencing, hyperarousal, physio-
logical hyperreactivity, and intense psychological distress). These are extremely disturbing
symptoms for children and hasten the development of numbing and/or avoidance, which
in turn interfere with the child’s ability to reminisce about the loved one. Thus, in CTG,
PTSD trauma symptoms impinge on the child’s ability to reminisce about the loved one
and to achieve reconciliation, which is necessary for the successful negotiation of normal
bereavement (Cohen & Mannarino, 2004). As Pynoos (1992) stated, “It is difficult for a
child to reminisce . . . when an image of . . . mutilation is what first comes to mind” (p. 7).
This is the essence of the current concept of CTG.

Other Components of CTG

In addition to the encroachment of trauma symptoms on children’s ability to grieve, some
children avoid acknowledging any similarities between themselves and the deceased, as
they are afraid that they may also die in a tragic and horrific manner (Nader, 1997; Pynoos,
1992). Integrating some positive aspects of the deceased into one’s own self-perception
is a key task of reconciliation. Accordingly, children who are afraid of any identification
with the deceased may be unable to successfully reconcile themselves to the loss of this
person (Cohen & Mannarino, 2004). In contrast, some children may identify too strongly or
intensely with the loved one who died. For example, they may wear clothing that belonged
to the loved one or take his or her name to avoid accepting the loss. These may well be
attempts to not face the emotional pain associated with the normal bereavement process
(Nader, 1997).
 Traumatic Loss in Children and Adolescents 27

Children with traumatic grief may blame themselves for the death of the loved one
or feel intense guilt that their loved one has died while they have survived. This may be
particularly true in large mass disasters (e.g., weather-related events or terrorism; Nader,
1997; Pynoos & Nader, 1990). Additionally, some children may develop rescue or revenge
fantasies. In the former, some children may unrealistically blame themselves for not being
able to rescue or save the deceased person and may develop rescue fantasies in which they
successfully do so. Revenge fantasies may also occur in which children imagine that they
hurt or punish the individual(s) who are responsible for the death of their loved one (Eth &
Pynoos, 1985).
Children face additional challenges when their loved one dies in circumstances to
which society attaches a stigma. Such circumstances might include suicide, homicide that
is drug-related, or death as part of family or domestic violence. In these situations, children
may experience significant embarrassment and shame (Eth & Pynoos, 1985; Nader, 1997).
Unlike children whose loved ones died in circumstances viewed as heroic (e.g., police
officers or rescue workers who die in the line of duty), these children typically do not
receive an outpouring of public sympathy or financial support. It is possible that the added
stigma or negative community judgment about the manner of death may constitute a risk
factor for developing CTG (Cohen & Mannarino, 2004).
After the death of a family member, children may experience secondary adversities
such as the loss of the family’s home, family income, or health insurance. If the family
has to relocate, children may also be required to change schools and be faced with loss of
close friends, a new peer group, different place of worship, and a completely unfamiliar
social support system. These adjustments can be extremely stressful even in the absence of
losing a loved one but are added burdens after a family member has died. These adversities,
as well as preexisting family stressors, increase children’s likelihood of developing CTG
(Cohen & Mannarino, 2004).
The ability to comprehend death and master the tasks associated with grief and trauma
depend on children’s cognitive and emotional development, at least in part. Accordingly,
some authors have suggested that children at different developmental levels may manifest
traumatic grief in unique ways consistent with their developmental stage (Nader, 1997;
Pynoos, 1992; Pynoos & Nader, 1990). To date, however, there has not been any empiri-
cal research to support the concept of developmental variation in the clinical presentation
of CTG.
Discussions about developmental variation in CTG are further complicated by the
ongoing controversy regarding the diagnostic criteria for and clinical assessment of PTSD
symptoms in very young children. Specifically, child PTSD researchers have raised con-
cerns that the current diagnostic criteria for PTSD (e.g., presence of three avoidance
symptoms) are not appropriate for young children and need to be modified. Moreover, no
consensus exists regarding how PTSD symptoms should be evaluated in this young popu-
lation (e.g., interview with parent only vs. combination of child and parent interviews).
Accordingly, at the present time, it is difficult to support the notion of developmen-
tal variation in the clinical presentation of CTG when the nature and assessment of
PTSD symptoms (a necessary but not sufficient condition for traumatic grief) in very
young children have not achieved any type of consensus among experts in the field
(Cohen et al., 2002).
Parental response may have a significant impact upon the development and intensity
of traumatic grief in children (Nader, 1997; Pynoos & Nader, 1990). Particularly when a
parent has died, the surviving parent may have increased caretaking responsibilities and
work demands that can result in higher levels of general distress as well as irritability
28 A. P. Mannarino and J. A. Cohen

and fatigue. These symptoms can reduce the parent’s emotional availability and affect the
consistency of parenting (Nader, 1997). Moreover, a parent’s own avoidance can make it
difficult to tolerate a child’s expression of normal grief symptoms. Thus, the combination
of parental distress and avoidance can make it more probable that a child will develop
traumatic grief (Nader, 1997).
Observing a child’s grief and pain over the loss of a loved one is extremely hard for
most parents. They may feel that their child has been through “too much” and that the world
is no longer a safe place. In response to these perceptions, parents may become lax in their
limit setting or overly protective, both of which can create increased insecurity and anxi-
ety in the child. If normal routines are disrupted and children are not permitted in engage
in activities consistent with their developmental level (e.g., sleepovers, school activities),
they will likely begin to perceive their world as unsafe and unpredictable. This, in turn,
will make it harder for children to negotiate the normal grieving process and contribute to
persistent symptomatology. It should be noted that parental emotional distress in response
to traumatic events and lack of parental support are associated with more severe and persis-
tent PTSD symptoms in some cohorts of traumatized children (Cohen & Mannarino, 1996,
2000). Empirical research is needed to determine whether such associations are present in
CTG as well (Cohen et al., 2002).
A number of studies have examined mediating factors in symptom formation follow-
ing the traumatic death of friends or family members; however, PTSD symptoms, not
traumatic grief, have been the primary focus (Malmquist, 1982; Pfefferbaum et al., 2000;
Pynoos et al., 1987). In these studies, severity of PTSD symptoms has been associated with
greater exposure, such as witnessing death (Pynoos et al., 1987) or the closeness of the rela-
tionship to the deceased (Brent et al., 1993; Brent et al., 1995; Cerel, Fristad, Weller, &
Weller, 1999). Additionally, Brent et al. (1996b) reported that having a conversation with
the deceased within the 24 hours before the deceased committed suicide predicted both
PTSD and depressive symptoms 3 years later. The latter study suggests the potential con-
tribution of perceived guilt, regret, and/or responsibility for the death in the development
of CTG, particularly in adolescents.

Assessment of CTG
The general assessment of CTG should include a comprehensive evaluation of the past
and current functioning of the child and family as would be the case in any psychiatric
or psychological evaluation. Additionally, the child’s experience and perceptions of the
loved one and his or her death, the child’s PTSD symptoms, and the encroachment of these
symptoms on the child’s ability to engage in the normal bereavement process should be
examined (Cohen et al., 2002).
Specific assessment procedures for children with possible traumatic grief have been
suggested by some authors. Pynoos and Eth (1986) developed an interview technique for
children exposed to trauma that can be used to assess the likelihood of traumatic grief.
As part of the interview process, the child describes the impact of the trauma through an
unstructured free drawing and storytelling task. The child is then encouraged to describe
the trauma in detail, including the “worst moment,” sensory details, and who was responsi-
ble for what occurred. Steinberg (1997) recommends a less structured interview approach
that is relationship-oriented. This approach evaluates the family’s history before the death,
the quality of family relationships, home atmosphere after the loss, available social support
system, the meaning of the death to the child, and the child’s hopes and plans for the future
(Cohen et al., 2002).
 Traumatic Loss in Children and Adolescents 29

Although there has been increased empirical attention over the past decade to recog-
nizing and defining CTG and identifying its correlates, there has been relatively little work
in the area of developing psychometrically sound assessment instruments to evaluate it.
Thus, there are few options in terms of validated assessment instruments. The UCLA/BYU
Expanded Grief Inventory (EGI; Layne et al., 2001) is the only published instrument that
assesses CTG and has been validated by two independent groups (Brown & Goodman,
2005; Layne et al., 2001). The EGI includes 28 items to which children respond on a
5-point Likert scale. The EGI is appropriate for children ages 7 to 17 years (Layne et al.,
2001). Factor analysis (Layne et al., 2001) has revealed distinct scales for uncomplicated
bereavement (i.e., able to experience positive memories, dreams, conversations, and con-
nections with the deceased) versus traumatic grief (i.e., traumatic intrusion and avoidance
interfering with normal bereavement). The Characteristics, Attributions and Responses to
Exposure to Death-Youth and Parent Versions (CARED-Y and CARED-P; Brown et al.,
2008) is a 39-item self-report measure that gathers information about peritraumatic aspects
of the loved one’s death as well as information about the child’s premorbid relationship
with the deceased and participation in mourning rituals. The psychometric properties of
the latter instrument are reasonable despite it being a relatively new instrument (Brown &
Goodman, 2005; Brown et al., 2008). There is no validated instrument available to assess
CTG in very young children (Cohen & Mannarino, 2010).

Treatment for CTG

Without intervention, traumatic death appears to have the potential for long-term effects
on children and adolescents (Nader, Pynoos, Fairbanks, & Frederick, 1990; Pfefferbaum
et al., 1999; Pynoos et al., 1987). A follow-up study of the children involved in a sniper
attack revealed continued trauma and grief symptoms at six months as well as one year
later (Nader et al., 1990; Pynoos et al., 1987). Similarly, at eight to ten months following
the Oklahoma City bombing, children who lost a loved one reported more significant PTSD
symptoms than nonbereaved children (Pfefferbaum et al., 2000; Pfefferbaum et al., 1999).
Therefore, it is important that effective interventions be developed and provided for these
children.
Given that CTG has been defined as the encroachment of PTSD symptoms on the
child’s ability to negotiate the normal bereavement process, it makes sense that treatment
for CTG would include both PTSD and grief-focused interventions. The treatment models
that have been developed for CTG to date have indeed made this assumption. The following
section is adapted from Cohen and Mannarino (2010).

Traumatic Grief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TG-CBT)

TG-CBT is derived from Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT) and
is the application of TF-CBT principles to children who have experienced a traumatic
loss. TF-CBT has the greatest amount of empirical support of any treatment model that has
been developed for traumatized children. Ongoing research has demonstrated that TF-CBT
results in a significant reduction of PTSD symptoms, depression, and behavioral problems
in traumatized children and similar reductions in emotional distress and depression in their
caretakers (Cohen, Mannarino, & Deblinger, 2006). Similar to TF-CBT, TG-CBT is typi-
cally provided in parallel sessions to the child and the parent or caretaker, with some joint
child–parent sessions. However, with TG-CBT, grief-focused components are added to the
trauma-focused opponents. Moreover, the grief-focused components are typically imple-
mented after the child has successfully resolved ongoing trauma symptoms. Grief-focused
30 A. P. Mannarino and J. A. Cohen

components in TG-CBT include grief education, grieving the loss and resolving ambiva-
lent feelings about the loved one who died, preserving positive memories, and redefining
the relationship with the person who died to one of memory.
It should be noted that the parallel sessions with the parent or caretaker are critical to
TG-CBT as they are with TF-CBT. In this regard, parents are provided psycho-education
about how children of different ages perceive death so that they can better understand what
their children are experiencing. Also, behavior management is an important part of the
parent sessions to address any ongoing behavioral problems. Joint sessions with the child
and parent can be used to help the family to anticipate future loss and change reminders
(e.g., anniversaries, graduations, birthdays) and to develop plans to effectively cope with
the painful memories these important events may evoke.
There is beginning to emerge some empirical support for TG-CBT, which suggests
that it has the potential to help children suffering from traumatic grief. In two open trials
(i.e., no comparison or control group) of TG-CBT, children suffering from traumatic grief
had significant reductions in CTG and PTSD symptoms (Cohen, Mannarino, & Knudsen,
2004; Cohen, Mannarino & Staron, 2006). Also, there has been one randomized clinical
trial (RCT) involving TG-CBT that was conducted in the New York City area for children
whose uniformed parents died in the rescue efforts related to the September 11 terrorist
attack. In this investigation, Brown, Goodman, Cohen, and Mannarino (2004) reported
that the mothers in the TG-CBT group experienced significantly greater improvements in
PTSD symptoms and general distress than mothers in the client-centered therapy group.
There were no significant group differences in child outcomes.

UCLA Trauma/Grief Program for Adolescents

This treatment model (Layne et al., 2001) is provided on a group basis and has been adapted
for children as young as 11. Treatment modules include processing the traumatic experi-
ence through exposure and cognitive restructuring, dealing with trauma and loss reminders,
addressing secondary adversities, focusing on the interrelationship between trauma and
grief, and helping teenagers to move forward developmentally.
The UCLA model has been examined in two open studies. The first was with Bosnian
adolescents after the civil war and the second was with adolescents exposed to commu-
nity violence in Los Angeles (Layne et al., 2001; Saltzman, Pynoos, Layne, Steinberg,
& Aisenberg, 2001). Both studies demonstrated that participants experienced significant
improvement in CTG and PTSD symptoms as well as improved adaptive functioning (e.g.,
academic achievement).

Group and Trauma Intervention for Elementary-Aged Children

Salloum, Avery, and McClain (2001) described a pilot group model for adolescent
survivors of homicide victims. Subsequently, Salloum (2004) adapted this model for ado-
lescents exposed to other traumatic experiences and is currently evaluating this model with
children whose significant others died related to Hurricane Katrina. Components of this
model include reducing traumatic reactions associated with the traumatic death, trauma
and grief psycho-education, offering a safe environment for children to share thoughts
and feelings, and various bereavement tasks (Salloum, 2004). It includes Rynearson’s
(2001) restorative retelling approach, which attempts first to foster resilience, followed
by a healing narrative experience, and then reconnecting.
This treatment model has been tested in two open studies and is currently being
tested in an RCT for children whose family members or other significant others died after
 Traumatic Loss in Children and Adolescents 31

Hurricane Katrina. Both pilot studies included youth exposed to homicide or other violence
(Salloum, 2006; Salloum et al., 2001) and both demonstrated significant improvement in
PTSD symptoms.

Child–Parent Psychotherapy (CPP)

Lieberman and Van Horn (2005) developed CPP, a relationship-based treatment for infants
and preschool children exposed to domestic violence. CPP involves joint sessions with
parents and their young children that focus on resolving maladaptive behaviors, supporting
developmentally appropriate interactions, and guiding the child and parent in creating a
joint narrative of the traumatic events (Lieberman et al., 2005). More recently, Lieberman
et al. (2005) have adapted CPP for very young children whose parents died under traumatic
circumstances.
Empirical support for CPP largely comes from one RCT for young children who expe-
rienced domestic violence. In this study, some of the children lost a primary caretaker as a
result of this violence (Lieberman et al., 2005). To date, CPP has not been investigated in
terms of its direct impact on traumatic grief in children.
To summarize, CTG shares some common features with other childhood traumas
but has some unique characteristics and core components. CTG is not typical even after
a traumatic death and must be differentiated from normal bereavement. Some promis-
ing interventions have been developed to treat children who suffer from traumatic grief.
However, these treatments will need to be refined as our understanding of the spe-
cific nature and scope of CTG evolves based on ongoing research and clinical program
development for this population.

References
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
(4th ed., text revision). Washington, DC: Author.
Brent, D. A., Moritz, G., Bridge, J., Perper, J., & Canobbio, R. (1996a). The impact of adolescent
suicide on siblings and parents: A longitudinal follow-up. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior,
26, 253–259.
Brent, D. A., Moritz, G., Bridge, J., Perper, J., & Canobbio, R. (1996b). Long-term impact of expo-
sure to suicide: A three-year controlled follow-up. Journal of the American Academy of Child and
Adolescent Psychiatry, 35, 646–653.
Brent, D. A., Perper, J. A., & Moritz, G. (1993). Psychiatric sequelae to the loss of an adolescent peer
to suicide. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 32, 509–517.
Brent, D. A., Perper, J. A., Moritz, G., Liotus, L., Richardson, D., Canobbio, R., et al. (1995).
Posttraumatic stress disorder in peers of adolescent suicide victims, Predisposing factors and
phenomenology. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 34,
209–215.
Brown, E. J., Amaya-Jackson, L., Cohen, J. A., Handel, S., Thiel de Bocanegra, H., Zatta, E., et al.
(2008). Childhood traumatic grief: A multi-site empirical examination of the construct and its
correlates. Death Studies, 32, 899–923.
Brown, E. J., & Goodman, R. F. (2005). Childhood traumatic grief: An exploration of the construct
in children bereaved on September 11. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34,
248–259.
Brown, E. J., Goodman, R. F., Cohen, J. A., & Mannarino, A. P. (2004, April). Treatment of child-
hood traumatic grief: A randomized controlled trial. Paper presented in symposium “Childhood
Traumatic Grief” at Strengthening Our Future: Developing Healthy Children and Youth, Strong
Families and Safe Communities, Kansas City, MO.
32 A. P. Mannarino and J. A. Cohen

Cerel, J., Fristad, M. A., Weller, E. B., & Weller, R. A. (1999). Suicide bereaved children and ado-
lescents, a controlled longitudinal examination. Journal of the American of Child and Adolescent
Psychiatry, 38, 672–679.
Children’s Bereavement Center of South Texas. (2008). 2008 Report to our community. Retrieved
from http://www.cbcst.org/docs/AnnualReport.pdf
Cohen, J. A., Deblinger, E., Mannarino, A. P., & Steer, R. A. (2004). A multisite randomized con-
trolled trial for sexually abused children with PTSD symptoms. Journal of the American Academy
of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 43, 393–402.
Cohen, J. A., & Mannarino, A. P. (1996). Factors that mediate treatment outcome of sexually abused
preschool children. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 35,
1402–1410.
Cohen, J. A., & Mannarino, A. P. (2000). Predictors of treatment outcome in sexually abused
children. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24, 983–994.
Cohen, J. A., & Mannarino, A. P. (2004). Treatment of childhood traumatic grief. Journal of Clinical
Child and Adolescent Psychology, 33, 819–831.
Cohen, J. A., & Mannarino, A. P. (2006). Treating childhood traumatic grief. In T. Rynearson (Ed.),
Violent death: Resilience and intervention beyond the crisis (pp. 479–490). New York, NY:
Routledge Press.
Cohen, J. A., & Mannarino, A. P. (2010). Childhood traumatic grief. In M. D. Dulcan (Ed.), Textbook
of child and adolescent psychiatry (pp. 509–516). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric
Publishing.
Cohen, J. A., Mannarino, A. P., & Deblinger, E. (2006). Treating trauma and traumatic grief in
children and adolescents. New York, NY: Guilford.
Cohen, J. A., Mannarino, A. P., Greenberg, T., Padlo, S., & Shipley C. (2002). Childhood traumatic
grief: Concepts and controversies. Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 3, 307–327.
Cohen, J. A., Mannarino, A. P., & Knudsen, K. (2004). Treating childhood traumatic grief: A pilot
study. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 43, 1225–1233.
Cohen, J. A., Mannarino, A. P., & Staron, V. (2006). Modified cognitive behavioral therapy for child-
hood traumatic grief (CBT-CTG): A pilot study. Journal of the American Academy of Child and
Adolescent Psychiatry, 45, 1465–1473.
Copeland, W. E., Keeler, G., Angold, A., & Costello, E. J. (2007). Traumatic events and posttraumatic
stress disorder in childhood. Archives of General Psychiatry, 64, 577–584.
Eth, S., & Pynoos, R. S. (1985). Interaction of trauma and grief in childhood. In S. Eth & R. S. Pynoos
(Eds.), Post-traumatic stress disorder in children (pp. 171–186). Washington, DC: American
Psychiatric Press.
Felitti, V. J., Anda, R. F., Nordenberg, D., Williamson, D. F., Spitz, A. M., Edwards, V., et al. (1998).
Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of
death in adults: The adverse childhood experiences (ACE) study. American Journal of Preventive
Medicine, 14, 245–258.
Finkelhor, D., Ormrod, R. K., Turner, H. A., & Hamby, S. L. (2005). Measuring poly-victimization
using the juvenile victimization questionnaire. Child Abuse and Neglect, 29, 1297–1312.
Layne, C. M., Pynoos, R. S., Saltzman, W. S., Arslanagic, B., Black, M., Savjak, N., et al.
(2001). Trauma/grief-focused group psychotherapy: School-based post-war intervention with
traumatized Bosnian adolescents. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 5, 277–290.
Lieberman, A. F., &Van Horn, P. (2005). Don’t hit my mommy! A manual for child-parent
psychotherapy with young witnesses of family violence. Washington, DC: Zero to Three Press.
Lieberman, A. F., Van Horn, P., & Ippen, C. G. (2005). Toward evidence-based treatment: Child-
parent psychotherapy with preschoolers exposed to marital violence. Journal of the American
Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 44, 1241–1248.
Lipschitz, D. S., Rasmussen, A. M., Anyan, W., Cromwell, P., & Southwick, S. M. (2000). Clinical
and functional correlates of posttraumatic stress disorder in urban adolescent girls at a primary
care clinic. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 39, 1104–1111.
 Traumatic Loss in Children and Adolescents 33

Malmquist, C. P. (1982). Children who witness parental murder, posttraumatic aspects. Journal of
the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 25, 320–325.
Nader, K. O. (1997). Childhood traumatic loss, the interaction of trauma and grief. In C. R. Figley,
B. E. Bride, & N. Mazza (Eds.), Death and trauma, the traumatology of grieving (pp. 17–41).
Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.
Nader, K. O., Pynoos, R. W., Fairbanks, L., & Frederick, C. (1990). Children’s PTSD reactions one
year after a sniper attack at their school. American Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 1526–1530.
Pfefferbaum, B., Gurwitch, R. H., McDonald, N. B., Leftwich, M. J. T., Sconzo, G. M.,
Messenbaugh, A. K., et al. (2000). Posttraumatic stress among young children after the death
of a friend or acquaintance in a terrorist bombing. Psychiatric Services, 51, 386–388.
Pfefferbaum, B., Nixon, S. J., Tucker, P. M., Tivis, R. D., Moore, V. L., Gurwitch, R. H., et al. (1999).
Posttraumatic stress responses in bereaved children after the Oklahoma City bombing. Journal of
the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 38, 1372–1379.
Pynoos, R. S. (1992). Grief and trauma in children and adolescents. Bereavement Care, 11, 2–10.
Pynoos, R. S., & Eth, S. (1986). Witness to violence, the child interview. Journal of the American
Academy of Child Psychiatry, 25, 306–319.
Pynoos, R. S., Frederick, C., Nader, K., Arroyo, W., Steinberg, A., Spencer, E., et al. (1987).
Life threat and posttraumatic stress in school-age children. Archives of General Psychiatry, 44,
1057–1063.
Pynoos, R. S., & Nader, K. (1990). Children’s exposure to violence and traumatic death. Psychiatric
Annals, 20, 334–344.
Rynearson, E. K. (2001). Retelling violent death. Philadelphia, PA: Brunner Routledge.
Salloum, A. (2004). Group work with adolescents after violent death: A manual for practitioners.
New York, NY: Brunner Routledge.
Salloum, A. (2006). Group therapy for children experiencing grief and trauma due to homicide and
violence: A pilot study. Unpublished manuscript.
Salloum, A., Avery, L., & McClain, R. P. (2001). Group psychotherapy for adolescent survivors
of homicide victims: A pilot study. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent
Psychiatry, 40, 1261–1267.
Saltzman, W. R., Pynoos, R. S., Layne, C. M., Steinberg, A .M., & Aisenberg, E. (2001). Trauma-and
grief-focused intervention for adolescents exposed to community violence: Results of a school-
based screening and group treatment protocol. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice,
5, 291–303.
Saunders, B. E. (2003). Understanding children exposed to violence: Toward an integration of
overlapping fields. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 356–376.
Stein, B. D., Jaycox, L. H., Kataoka, S. H., Wong, M., Tu, W., Elliott, M. N., et al. (2003). A men-
tal health intervention for school children exposed to violence: A randomized controlled trial.
Journal of the American Medical Association, 290, 603–611.
Steinberg, A. (1997). Death as trauma for children, a relational treatment approach. In C. R. Figley,
B. E. Bride, & N. Mazza (Eds.), Death and trauma, the traumatology of grieving (pp. 123–137).
Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.
Wolfelt, A. D. (1996). Healing the bereaved child: Grief gardening, growth through grief, and other
touchstones for caregivers. Fort Collins, CO: Companion Press.
Worden, J. W. (1996). Children and grief: When a parent dies. New York, NY: Guilford.