Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
20/01/2020
LITERATURE
• Metrick/Yasuda, Chapter 10
VALUATION APPROACHES
• DCF analysis:
• WACC.
• APV.
• Comparables
• Comparable Transactions
• Real Options
2
20/01/2020
• Estimate the likely time at which the VC will exit the investment.
3
20/01/2020
• Forecast the firm value at the exit date (e.g. IPO or trade sale).
• Standard issues:
• Which comparables?
• Which multiples?
• When? E.g. IPO market is hot now but will it be in 4 years?
• VC Issues:
• Often comparable firms have negative earnings
• Can’t use EBIT etc.
• Rather use Sales or Employees
• Often only data on IPO’s available – what about TS?
• Might create upward bias in Valuations
4
20/01/2020
5
20/01/2020
6
20/01/2020
• Pre-money value:
TV
Pre Money NPV (TV ) I
(1 r )T
EXAMPLE: OZ.COM
7
20/01/2020
OZ.COM (CONT.)
OZ.COM (CONT.)
Step 4: Valuation
• Post-money value: 150/(1+50%)5= $20m.
• Pre-money value: 20 – 4 = $16m.
• This is a positive NPV project (if you believe 50% is OK).
8
20/01/2020
SO FAR…
VC METHOD – EXTENSIONS
9
20/01/2020
EXPECTED RETENTION
EXPECTED RETENTION
• And the future price will be fair, i.e. with another investor.
10
20/01/2020
11
20/01/2020
• We start by asking how likely it is that the firm succeeds. Let’s define p =
probability of a successful exit:
𝑋 1 𝑟
𝑋 𝑃𝑉 ⟺ 𝑋𝑀 𝐸𝑉 ⟺ 𝐸𝑉
𝑝
• If we know the VC’s discount rate 𝑟 , we can compute an implicit discount rate
for each project, 𝑟 .
12
20/01/2020
A NUMERICAL EXAMPLE
• Is this the last word on discount rates? Not really. This is just a stop-gap
explanation.
• In most practical cases, CAPM would give discount rates well below
25%, let alone 80%.
13
20/01/2020
SO FAR…
• Though VCs will certainly use the previous method --- and you
need to know how to do it --- it does not preclude you from:
• having a healthy dose of skepticism;
• taking a more sophisticated approach to the problem.
SCENARIO ANALYSIS:
AN ALTERNATIVE TO HIGH DISCOUNT RATES
• It’s better to model the sources of uncertainty and to put
probabilities on the various events.
• Some major uncertainties will get resolved soon;
• Others will take more time;
• Some scenarios will require you to take different actions.
14
20/01/2020
EXAMPLE
• In 2 years:
• Good news (proba.1/3): Invest $60m Get out $300m.
• OK news (proba.1/3): Invest $60m Get out $150m.
• Bad news (proba.1/3): Invest $60m Get out $30m.
EXAMPLE (CONT.)
• One approach:
• Discount the cash flow from the best case scenario (300 - 60) using a high
discount rate.
• This high rate would correct for the probability of less favorable outcomes.
• But which one? And why?
• Alternative:
• Analyze each scenario.
• Realize that you won’t invest if bad news arrives, so expected payoff in year
2 is really:
1/3 x (300-60) + 1/3 x (150-60) + 1/3 x 0
15
20/01/2020
DISCUSSION
16