Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Spanish Delegation:
• Eugenio Montero Rios,
• Buenaventura Abarzuza,
• Jose de Garnica,
• Wenceslao Ramirez de Villa-Urrutia, and
• Rafael Cerero.
• The client has implemented internal procedures that ensure objective choices in commissioning
non-assurance engagements
• The client has a corporate governance structure that provides appropriate oversight and
communications regarding the firm’s services
• The client requires a person other than management to ratify or approve the appointment of an
accounting firm to perform an engagement
Spanish Delegation:
• Eugenio Montero Rios,
• Buenaventura Abarzuza,
• Jose de Garnica,
• Wenceslao Ramirez de Villa-Urrutia, and
• Rafael Cerero.
Before accepting a new client relationship, a professional accountant in public practice shall
determine whether acceptance would create any threats to compliance with the fundamental
principles.
Potential threats to integrity or professional behavior may be created from, for example, questionable
issues associated with the client (its owners, management or activities).
PSQC 1 and
PSA 220
The fundamental principle of professional competence and due care imposes an obligation on a
professional accountant in public practice to provide only those services that the professional
accountant in public practice is competent to perform.
A self-interest threat to professional competence and due care is created if the engagement team
does not possess, or cannot acquire, the competencies necessary to properly carry out the
engagement.
A CPA in public practice who is asked to replace another CPA, should determine any reasons for not
accepting the engagement, such as circumstances that create threats to compliance with the
fundamental principles.
The threats must be evaluated, such that this may require direct communication with the existing
accountant (i.e.,CPA) to establish the facts and circumstances so that the CPA can decide whether it
would be appropriate to accept the engagement.
Predecessor
auditor