Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unit-1
1. Productivity
2. Speed of work
3. Quality of work
4. Service
5. Learning
1. Productivity
Speed is related to the time factor of the efforts put on by the employee to measure
his/her effectiveness or the efforts put on to reduce or eliminate the unwanted
breaks/interruptions or delays.
This is more critical and important in chain production process where every next
operation is dependent on the completion of the preceding one in time.
Similarly, the group performance is dependent on the time efficiency of each member
of the group.
The most widespread economic development could be achieved by cutting down or
minimizing the overtime payments and consolidation of cost benefit due to speed of
work.
This speed of work thus becomes a factor of determining the compensation and
benefit both to the employees and the employers.
Speed of work no doubt increases the productivity and presses a higher demand of
compensation, but speed should not refer to quantity alone but also to the quality of
work and safety of men, machines and materials, as well as ensure the compilation of
safety rules.
3. Quality of work
Quality is the totality of features and characteristics of a product or service that bear
on its ability to satisfy stated or implied needs.
Quality is also one of the elements of productivity and the result of competency of the
individual.
Productivity measured in quantity may be satisfactory in some of the production units
where the human contribution may be negligible to maintain quality.
But in most of the production or service units, quality must wed quantity to justify the
quality production level. So is the case of performance, which could be measured in
terms of quantity as well as quality and the qualitative worth. Both become imperative
to justify the compensation.
Quality feedback from a performer is information, which can be acted upon as it
contains examples of individual behaviour, contention, conscious efforts and
commitments.
This could not only be used to analyze the job performers but can also be useful in
guiding, training and motivating the employees in managing the change by
eliminating negative behaviour.
The job worth also cannot be measured by providing numbers alone but a job may be
complete only if it is done with the desired quality.
However, quality consciousness too can have adverse effect on quantitative
production. Therefore compensation should be viewed in the context of the concept of
equity as it is sometimes difficult to assess whether the subjects were concerned about
reducing quality or whether it was low simply because of their concern for higher
quality.
Especially it becomes difficult to evaluate the job worth when the subjects are paid at
piece rate with the intention to produce quality. In such situations sometimes over
paid employees produce less than equitably paid employees.
Expectancy theory, however, emphasizes that employees will try to maximize their
output rather than try to balance the input to output. The job design process therefore
will have to consider the aspects of motivating behavioral expectations and methods
to ensure the desired quality and time to produce the job.
4. Service
Services refer to attitude, habits and behavior of the employees, which are to the ways
of offering intellectual, manual or combined efforts to do any job.
It is the quality of services and mannerism which decide the compensation worth
besides the quantity, and the quality of the product or service.
Quality of service includes time keeping, attitude and behavior at work place, quick
understanding of the problem, the ability to quickly arrive at a conclusion to a
solution and promptness to attend the complaints.
The compensation differentials, therefore could be generally seen in the same type of
service offered by different individuals.
5. Learning
Learning as used here refers to concerted activity that increases the capacity and
willingness of individuals, groups, organizations and communities to acquire and
productively apply new knowledge and skills, to grow and mature and to adapt
successfully to changes and challenges.
Such learning empowers individuals and organizations to make wise choices, solve
problems and break new ground. Education is involved with transmitting concepts
and ideas.
It is a marvelous ability of an individual to learn and grow and there is no limit to this
capacity. In the learning process, the mind takes in information through a number of
receptors, edits it and compares it with previously received information.
The actions and reactions that occur are stored in the memory for future use. Thus, an
older learner has a rich bank of experience complemented by a reinforced attitude.
The initial learning makes a significant contribution to one’s attitude and continuous
learning reinforces it or improves it. He/she develops confidence to prepare responses
to new situations and to other people based on the learning experiences.
Learning which behavior pattern leads to rewards and which one to punishment can
certainly help an individual to adjust to the working environment and feel comfortable
without grumbling for compensation. On the other hand, more and learning enhances
conceptual and behavioral knowledge which can help him/her to earn more.
Unconscious competence is what causes mental errors, serious mistakes and resulting
accidents. Lack of knowledge is a cause of negative perceptions and proper learning
habits can only overcome this deficiency.
The performance of individual can go on increasing if he/she has an aptitude for
learning. Learning habit is an important characteristic of an individual, which
positively benefits personal development and helps an organization with improved
efficiency.
Compensation increments provide the opportunity to-take more challenging roles but
they require extra skill, knowledge and expertise which could be achieved through
learning.
The ability to think, the capacity to learn and the details kept in mind are the
components of intelligence. Memorizing and retention the details are a skill that can
be learnt. It is this learning which develops one’s verbal ability, inductive reasoning
and problem-solving. These are considered in comparing the worth for compensation.
Ways to Beat Your Competition with Your Compensation Plan/ Planning for Improved
Competitiveness
When you hire a new employee, what you pay them can set the tone for long-term
satisfaction or disappointment with their compensation. If your organization notably under-
or over-pays your new hires, you run the risk of losing good talent or creating employees
who expect more than they have earned.
Be realistic. People know what they are worth. Even if they accept a position at
below-market wages, they may bear resentment toward the organization (and
ultimately leave).
Manage your managers. Rogue hiring managers do not always serve the
organization’s best interests. Whether they want to pay too little or too much, they
waste financial and talent resources. Make sure they are aware of what they can offer
and why.
The knowledge you need includes awareness of the regulatory environment in which you are
operating. If you work in the manufacturing industry, you have different issues to handle than
in the healthcare industry. But, both industries require specific know-how if you want your
company to excel and avoid legal trouble.
You will need to decide how competitive you want to be relative to the market. Your
organization’s competitive positioning will depend on many variables which may include:
the outlook for growth over the next year and beyond
your company’s ability to attract and retain talent
your industry
your overall philosophy on pay
Many companies choose to target the market somewhere between the 40th and 90th
percentiles.
How well do your employees understand their total compensation, – namely the amount of
money spent on them by the company – outside of base salary? To communicate total
compensation to employees, some organizations use what is sometimes referred to as an
annual benefit summary. What this summary does is provide a detailed list of costs incurred
by the organization to retain, train, support, and reward a member of that organization. There
is nothing complicated about it, it just requires some research on the part of the person who is
developing it.
There is nothing worse than taking money away from employees. In most cases, targeted and
smart layoffs are easier for the organization to recover from than taking money away from
employees. Not to mention that it is a lot easier to save dollars by focusing on a few
employees than by taking a little bit away from everyone. Most Americans are living
paycheck to paycheck. A reduction in pay can mean the difference between meeting all of
their financial obligations or not. In our society today, too many people are living too close to
the edge to absorb this type of financial hit.
One way to think about this is from a personal finance perspective. If you really needed to
save money in your household, you would cut back on non-essentials, such as eating out,
travel, clothing and movies, rather than reducing what you pay on your mortgage or
electricity bill. By giving full support where your crucial functions are, much like keeping a
top performer at their full wage, you increase your chances of surviving tough times.
6. Remember the key issues covered by a successful employee incentive plan.
Gain approval. Generally, it is the board of directors that approves the final policy, but these
aren’t the only people involved in developing your policy. The top executives such as the
CEO, COO, and CFO have input to the overall goals and objectives of the compensation
program. The human resources professional serves as the expert regarding items to be
included in the policy. Your organization may also choose to create a compensation
committee consisting of individual stakeholders from different departments including some
managers and employees as an internal control measure, as well as an employee engagement
strategy.
Understand the job. If you haven’t yet, correctly define the job for market pricing. When
you are targeting pay rates for positions, you’ll want to correctly define the full proficient
employee who has average performance. This centers your market compensation data at the
midpoint on the typical employees. Those that are new to the position or have less than
acceptable performance will be below your target pay rates, and those with more experience,
education or certifications than required, or those with outstanding performance, should be
above your target pay rates
Pay benchmarking is a valuable exercise which can save you money and underpin a whole
reward structure. There are plenty of reasons for undertaking pay benchmarking. Perhaps
you’re struggling to retain or attract talent; control payroll costs; or need demonstrate a clear
link between pay and business objectives.
The most effective way of persuading management is by highlighting future savings you’ll
make. Do your sums and appeal to their pockets:
Ad-hoc salary increases outside of a normal pay review are costly and ineffective.
Work out how much you’re currently spending on these, and demonstrate how
knowing the market rate will help you manage pay more efficiently.
Think of the money spent on costly recruitment campaigns with poor ROI – why is
the business wasting its time pitching jobs at the wrong market rate?
What do your attrition rates look like? How confident are you that leavers are exiting
the business because of reasons other than pay? How much money did you spend on
training new recruits last year? Would a more informed picture on the pay landscape
of your sector have helped at all?
Loss of talent – are your top employees going elsewhere and is reward a key factor in
that?
All of this, presented well, can make a reasoned case that is very difficult for the business to
ignore.
Too often we see the results of a pay benchmarking exercise shape next steps in a reward re-
alignment programme. But you shouldn’t wait for the outcome of the analysis to shape future
decisions around the intended management of pay. Make your aims clear from the offset. For
example: “we aim to be a median payer”; “we accept we are not market leaders in base pay,
however we know our benefit package is first class”; “we want to reward for performance
and tracking the market is a key factor in achieving that”.
This is the key decision in benchmarking – data is a significant cost and it’s vital to hone in
on what is suitable and most worthy of investment.
Choosing salary surveys because they are cheap or free is a false economy. Companies often
feel like they have their finger on the pulse of market data via various recruitment websites
and other freely available salary information. Unfortunately, this can prove more of a
hindrance than a help as the data is so high level, often masking hidden salary elements.
Choose salary surveys that provide data for roles with a robust matching methodology. Too
often surveys publish ranges of salary data linked solely to job title and this can prove very
misleading. The more reliable surveys use a proper matching system which allows companies
to match the specifics of their role with that of the survey.
Remember, a small amount of investment in a good salary survey reaps rewards in the long
term. Credibility is a key success factor in communicating decisions around pay management
and without a solid data foundation everything can be called into question.
The more information you have/know about the role, the more precise the benchmark. A few
pointers:
we see first-hand the measures of success associated with a solid reward management system,
and one of the most critical factors is transparency. Employees often have distorted
perceptions or unrealistic expectations as to what a pay benchmarking exercise might mean
for them. It’s therefore important to manage this and be as honest as possible as to the aims of
the company in embarking on this type of exercise.
External equity
Salary competitiveness versus the market. It is impossible to ensure fair pay without using
industry and regionally-specific market data to establish appropriate salary ranges for each
position.
Internal equity
Equal pay for equal work within the organization. When organizations leverage market data
to establish pay ranges, they incorporate that data into their overall salary structure. Jobs of
comparable value are assigned to the same grade range, and the range of pay is the same for
those jobs, which promotes equity. This assures that employees within an organization are
paid fairly versus each other.
The specific tactics that your organization should use to address pay fairness varies widely
depending on business goals. However, according to our Pay Practices and Compensation
Strategy survey, there are three approaches successful organizations consistently use to
ensure pay fairness:
With external competitiveness in mind, you should analyze outlying jobs and employees in
your organization’s salary structures to see if you are maintaining internal pay equity. To
this end, 13.7% of organizations use survey data and internal analytics to ensure pay is
equitable, and an additional 12.2% follow a formal compensation analysis process.
Organizations armed with accurate market data and an internally-equitable salary structure
have the blueprint for fair pay. However, your organization must also be proactive about
communicating with employees.
The mere perception of unfair pay is enough to sink an organization. To this end, some
organizations in our survey communicate with employees around job descriptions (6.9%) and
how their salaries are calculated (5.3%). Yet, the majority of organization have yet to
embrace this critical step in promoting their organizations commitment to fair pay.
To start, your organization can inhibit negative perceptions of pay by providing managers
with internal pay ranges, market data, and job descriptions for the roles they oversee. This
will allow direct superiors to be more transparent with employees and more effectively
articulate why their employees’ pay is fair.
But even if managers are armed with salary data, they may not adequately trained to discuss
compensation, and could communicate misinformation. Poor communication may cause
employees to become confused and disillusioned, further driving disengagement, flight risk,
and damage to a brand’s reputation.
Why is Fair Pay Important?
Pay fairness is not achieved through a one-time initiative or assessment. Maintaining internal
and external equity should be an evergreen priority. The modern workforce wants to be paid
equitably and competitively, and your employees want to work for a company that takes pay
fairness initiatives seriously.
Unlike HR-reported data, consumer-reported should never be relied on for external pay
points. The correlation between accurate market data and fair pay is not coincidence.
According to our survey, 23% of companies that agree or strongly agree that their employees
are paid fairly used market data.