Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/336594531
CITATIONS READS
0 38
3 authors:
Marian Marian
27 PUBLICATIONS 97 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Regional disparities in the distribution of tourism turnover in the South-East Development Region View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Radu Daniel Pintilii on 16 February 2020.
Abstract
Creative economies are today one of the fastest-growing economic sectors and an impressive transforming
force, than can contribute to increasing territorial, regional or national competitiveness and, therefore, to
economic growth and long-term development. The study aims to analyze the contribution of creative
economies to the local and regional economy. Quantification of the role of creative economies in the economic
profile was made by creating a database, at the level of administrative-territorial unit, with the main economic
indicators (number of companies, number of employees, turnover and profit) for the creative economies,
according to the NACE classification (Classification of National Economy Activities), for the period 2000-2016.
The database was also used for the evolution of the ranks held by each economic sector for the analyzed
period and for the development of trend matrices on the evolution of the above indicators, at the four-digit
NACE code. The result highlight the importance of creative sector in the dynamics of local and regional
economies of the territorial systems.
Keywords: creative economies, territorial systems, regional development, territorial management
1. INTRODUCTION
The creative economy has become today one of the fastest growing sectors of the economy,
while promoting human development, social inclusion and cultural diversity (UNCTAD, 2008,
Hajkowicz, 2015), stimulating entrepreneurship and investments (Henry, 2007; Henry and Bruin,
2011).
Creative industries contribute to economic growth, these play an important role in spreading
innovation across the economy through their products and services, but also through new ideas,
knowledge, processes and new ways of working (United Nations, 2011). Creative economies are
considered being generating functional complexity and implicitly by the economic growth of local
economies (Drake, 2003, Florida, 2005, Stoian et al., 2014, Pintilii et al., 2014).
Economic, social, structural changes and economic and financial crisis have affected the
various sectors of creative industries, but due to the heterogeneity of the creative sector, this is not
case for all these activities, such as the information and communications sector, which operates
independently (Pratt and Hutton, 2013). According to the Report on the creative economy in 2010,
creative industry was, in general, the more resistant to the world economic crisis than other
traditional processing industries (United Nations, 2011), contributes to general prosperity and works
in synergy with the knowledge-based economy (Veselá and Klimová, 2014).
2. METHODOLOGY
The analysis of the role of the creative economies in the local and regional economic profile
was realized through the creation of an economic database at the level of administrative territoral
127
The analysis of the trends of the number of companies in the creative sector for the period
2000-2016 (Figure 1.) shows an ascending development up to the year 2009, reaching the value of
60.633 companies, the most important activities being those related to architecture with 5.141 firms,
engineering activities and related technical consultancy with 10.752 companies and activities of
advertising agencies with 7.089 of companies. Being followed by a decrease in 2010 and a
significant increase until the year 2016, when the value reaches the maximum threshold of 71.203
companies in the sector, the most important being creative activities related to engineering activities
and related technical consultancy with 12.110 companies, the activities of advertising agencies with
7.991 firms and activities for custom software development activities (software-oriented client) with
7.592 firms.
The evolution of turnover in the creative sector in Romania for the period 2000-2016
(Figure 2.), presents an ascendant trend with decreases in the period 2005-2007, with the lowest
value in the year 2005, respectively, 15.600.160.552 lei. It can be observed a significant increase in
2008 and then a decrease and stagnation for the period 2009-2012, against the background of the
economic crisis. The highest values are recorded in the years 2015-2016 with 68.343.201.116 lei,
respectively, 69.671.264.198 lei the most important activities being activities related to engineering
activities and related technical consultancy and activities of advertising agencies and
telecommunications activities through cable networks.
129
Through the share, was shown the contribution made by the creative sector to the total value
of the economy in through the four economic indicators considered relevant (Figure 8. to Figure
12.).
Thus, the evolution of the share for the period 2000-2016 (Figure 5.) reveals an upward
trend, with values of 9.35% in 2008 and 9.60% respectively in 2009, followed by a slight decrease
and an increase of of the value of the weight in the period 2014-2016 with values of 10,09% in
2014, 10,44% in 2015 and 10,84% in 2016.
The analysis of the evolution of the share of turnover (Figure 6.), presents a descendant line
of the value of share of the creative sector, thus, it is noticed a decrease of the value of turnover by a
minimum threshold in 2005, with 3,97% of the total value of the economy, followed by a slight
increase and then a stagnation in the period 2011-2014 with the value of 5.72 % and 5,63% in the
years 2015, respectively, 2016.
By analysing the share of the number of employees for the period 2000-2016 (Figure 7.), it
is noted an ascending development with a maximum of value in 2008, with 7,10% of the employees
trained in the creative sector. After the year 2008, against the background of the economic crisis, it
is noticed a decrease to 5,97% in year 2009, during the period 2010-2016 is observed a slight
increase leading to the year 2016 the value of procentage of 6.95%.
130
The evolution of the share of profit of creative sector in relation to the total value of the
economy (Figure 8.) present a progress fluctuating line of values, such, it is noticed an increase up
to the year 2005, with a maximum of 9,57% values of the profits belong to the creative sector,
followed by the decrease and increase until the year 2010 when values stagnates and then decrease
slightly until the year 2016, leading to a value of 8,14%.
Figure 7. Share of the number of employees in the Figure 8. Share of profit in the creative sector
creative sector related to the total economy related to the total economy
The evolution of share of the number of firms in the creative sector related to the value of
the total economy for the eight development regions of Romania for the period 2000-2016 (Figure
9.) shows the Region 8 - Development Region Bucharest-Ilfov as the main region which groups
together the most important value of the share of firms in the creative sector with an ascending
development and maximum value of 4,33% in 2016. The Regions 6 – North-West Development
Region and Region 7 – Center Development Region presents notable value of the share, with
ascending developments and the maximum amount recorded in 2016 with 1.49% and with 1.13% of
the total values. Region 5 - West Development Region, Region 3 - South-Muntenia Development
Region, and Region 2 - South-East Development Region și Region 1 - North-East Development
Region present similar values of the share, with a maximum value in 2016, with values less than
1%. The Region 4 – South-Western Development Region is the region with the lowest values of the
share of the creative sector in the total values of the economy, with values not exceeding 0,5%.
The analysis of the share of turnover in the creative sector related to the value of the total
economy (Figure 10.) presents Region 8 - The Bucharest-Ilfov Development Region as the region
131
Figure 9. Share of the number of firms in the Figure 10. Share of turnover in the creative sector
creative sector related to the total economy for related to the total economy for development
development regions of Romania; Region 1 – regions of Romania; Region 1 – North-East
North-East Development region, Region 2 – Development region, Region 2 – South-East,
South-East, Region 3 –South-Muntenia Region 3 –South-Muntenia Development region,
Development region, Region 4 – South-West Region 4 – South-West Oltenia Development
Oltenia Development region, Region 5 – West region, Region 5 – West Development region,
Development region, Region 6 – North-West, Region 6 – North-West, Region 7 – Center
Region 7 – Center Development region, Region 8 Development region, Region 8 - Bucharest-Ilfov
- Bucharest-Ilfov Development region Development region
The evolution of the share of the number of employees in the creative sector related to the
value of the total economy for the eight development regions of Romania for the period 2000-2016
(Figure 11.) shows the Region 8 - Development Region Bucharest-Ilfov that region as the value of
the share of large groups of employees in the creative sector with an ascending trend and maximum
value of 3.78% in 2016. The Regions 6 – North-West Development Region and Region 7 - Center
Development Region shows the value of share of 0.86%, respectively 0.52% in 2016. Region 5 -
West Development Region, and Region 2 – South-Eastern Development Region shows fluctuations
values with a maximum of values 1.49% in 2008, respectively 0.76% in 2007. Region 1 - North-
East Development Region, Region 4 – South-Western Development Region and Region 3 - South-
Muntenia Development Region are the regions with the lowest values of the procentage of the
creative sector, with values not exceeding 0,5%.
The evolution of the share of profit of creative sector related to the value of the total
economy for the period 2000-2016 (Figure 12.) highlights Region 8 - Development Region
Bucharest-Ilfov that region to be noticed by the important values of the share of evolution, with
descending fluctuating line, with a maximum of 11,95% of total value of the economy. The Regions
6 – North-West Development Region and Region 7 - Center Development Region shows the values
of share of 0.86%, respectively, 0.54% in 2016. The other regions of development Region 5 - West
Development Region, Region 2 – South-Eastern Development Region, Region 1 - North-East
Development Region, Region 4 – South-Western Development Region and Region 3 - South-
132
Figure 11. Share of the number of employees in Figure 12. Share of profit in the creative sector
the creative sector related to the total economy for related to the total economy for development
development regions of Romania; Region 1 – regions of Romania; Region 1 – North-East
North-East Development region, Region 2 – Development region, Region 2 – South-East,
South-East, Region 3 –South-Muntenia Region 3 –South-Muntenia Development region,
Development region, Region 4 – South-West Region 4 – South-West Oltenia Development
Oltenia Development region, Region 5 – West region, Region 5 – West Development region,
Development region, Region 6 – North-West, Region 6 – North-West, Region 7 – Center
Region 7 – Center Development region, Region 8 Development region, Region 8 - Bucharest-Ilfov
- Bucharest-Ilfov Development region Development region
The results suggest new concepts in the analysis of the role of creative economies in
regional and local economic profile in Romania, these can fill in the studies made previously on the
dynamics of the economic profile of the creative economies (Peptenatu et al., 2012a, Pintilii et al.,
2014, Stoian et al., 2014, Pintilii et al., 2017), studies on the structural dynamics of territorial
systems (Ianos et al., 2012; Peptenatu et al., 2012a, 2012b; Prăvălie et al., 2014a, 2014b) and
strengthen the idea that the creative economies are generating functional complexity and growth of
local and regional economies (Drake, 2003, Florida, 2005, Stoian et al., 2014, Pintilii et al., 2014)
and can lead to a better understanding the role of the economic component in generating adaptive
capacity (Pintilii et al., 2016).
Also, the metodology used contribute to the completion of such studies and has an important
contribution to the complexity of the functional analysis at the level of the local economy
(Peptenatu et al., 2012).
4. CONCLUSION
Creative economies represent a valuable resource for the development and local and regional
economic growth. The analysis of the dynamics of economic profiles using the four economic
indicators (number of firms, turnover, number of employees and profit) reveals an ascending trend
analysis for the period 2000-2016.
133
5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported by a grant of the Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research
and Innovation, CNCS - UEFISCDI, project UB 1407/2018.
REFERENCES
Drake, G. 2003, This place gives me space: place and creativity in the creative industries.
Geoforum, 34, 511-524.
Florida R, 2005, The Flight of the Creative Class: The New Global Competition for Talent. New
York: Harper Collins Publishers.
Hajkowicz, K., Why is creative economy growing so strongly?, Global Strategic Foresight
Community of the World Economic Forum for the Annual Meeting 2015.
Henry, C. 2007, Entrepreneurship in the Creative Industries: An International Perspective, Edward
Elgar Publishing.
Henry, C. and De Bruin, A. 2011, Entrepreneurship and the Creative Economy: Process, Practice
and Policy, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Ianos, I., Peptenatu, D., Pintilii, R. D. & Draghici, C. 2012, About sustainable development of the
territorial emergent structures from the metropolitan area of Bucharest, 11(9), 1535-1545.
Peptenatu, D., Draghici, C., & Merciu, C. 2012a, Characteristics of entrepreneurial profile in some
emergent territorial structures in Romania, Actual problems of economics, 138, 448-458.
Peptenatu, D., Merciu, C., Merciu, G., Draghici, C. & Cercleux, L. 2012b, Specific features of
environment risk management in emerging territorial structures, Carpathian Journal of Earth
and Environmental Sciences, 7(2), 135-143.
Pintilii, R. D., Andronache, I. C., Simion, A. G., Draghici, C. C., Peptenatu, D., Ciobotaru, A. M.,
Dobrea, R. C. & Papuc, R. M. 2016, Determining forest fund evolution by fractal analysis
(Suceava-Romania), Urbanism Architecture Constructions, 7(1), 31-42.
Pintilii, R.D., Braghina, C., Draghici, C.C., Saghin, I. 2014, Territorial imbalances in the
distribution of the creative industries in the North-Eastern Development Region. Procedia Social
and Behavioral Sciences, 122, 179–183.
Pintilii, R.D., Peptenatu, D., Ciobotaru, A.M., Toma, S.G., Grigore, A.M., Drăghici, C.C., Dobrea,
R.C., Simion, A.G., Andronache, I., Teodorescu, C. and Diaconu, C. D. 2017, Creative
economies in Romania - spatial projections and trends, Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic
Series, 37, 95–108.
Pratt, A. C., & Hutton, T. A. 2013, Reconceptualising the relationship between the creative
economy and the city: Learning from the financial crisis, Cities, 33, 86–95.
Pravalie, R., Sirodoev, I. & Peptenatu, D. 2014a, Changes in the forest ecosystems in areas
impacted by aridization in south-western Romania, Journal of Environmental Health Science
and Engineering, 12(2).
Pravalie, R., Sirodoev, I., Patriche, C. V., Bandoc, G. & Peptenatu, D. 2014b, The analysis of the
relationship between climatic water deficit and corn agricultural productivity in the Dobrogea
plateau, Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, 9(4), 201-2014.
Stoian, D., Peptenatu, D., Pintilii, R. & Schvab, A. 2014, Territorial Distribution of Creative Poles
in Romania, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 122, 184-188.
134
135