Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/352355785
CITATIONS READS
0 27
3 authors:
Frank Wuttke
Kiel Unversity
200 PUBLICATIONS 824 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Experimental & Computational Hybrid Assessment of Natural Gas Pipelines Exposed to Seismic Risk View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Zarghaam Rizvi on 12 June 2021.
Abstract
In this research, the application of the in-house developed coupled hydro-mechanical lattice model
on numerical simulation of the hydraulic fracking process and the development of flow channels in
geomaterials is investigated. The mechanical model is based on the equation of motion, known as
Newton’s second law, which is solved using Newmark-𝛽 model and Newton-Raphson Jacobian.
According to the conservation of fluid mass in the domain and with the generation of artificial cavities
on the polygonal vertices, the fluid flow is simulated. The developed hydraulic pressures on the
polygonal vertices, after the saturation of the pore volumes, are then transferred into the mechanical
model. The Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion with a tension cutoff is implemented here to simulate the
fracking process. Eventually, the advantage of lattice models to account for inherent and stochastic
irregularities and heterogeneities that exist in geomaterials are depicted.
1 Introduction
During the last decade, the application of hydraulic fracking in extraction of oil and natural gases
from shale reservoirs has been extensively studied. Similarly, the artificial salt caverns have been used
for storage of various from of energy carriers. Finite Element Methods (FEM) and Phase field methods
are widely used to simulate the hydraulic fracking in geomaterials [1, 2]. During the past decade and
with the computational power growth, the application of discrete element methods in simulation of
hydraulic fracking are also begun to emerge [3]. Recently, the mechanical lattice model’s application
is extended from the static cases [4] to the dynamic models [5]. The existing hydraulic lattice models
are based on the dual lattice model, where boundaries of the polygonal cells are considered as flow
channels [6]. In the conducted study, the application of the in-house developed coupled hydro-
mechanical lattice model on the simulation of hydraulic fracking is investigated.
2 Domain Discretization
The vectorizable random lattice approach is implemented here to generate the nuclei in the domain.
The defined randomness factor (𝛼) in this approach varies from 0 to 1, where 0 results in regular
square shaped element patterns. The irregularities that exist in particles scale can be attained with the
greater randomness factor values. The Voronoi Tessellation and Delaunay Triangulation theories are
considered here to generate the polygonal shape Voronoi cells and lattice elements, respectively (Fig.
1a, Fig. 1b). The pursued mesh refinement technique around the cavities and pre-known fracking paths
reduces the computational demand of the algorithm. Additionally, with rearrangement of Voronoi
vertices of all cells surrounding the predefined fracks and cavities, smooth crack surfaces for better
visualization as well as accurate stress distribution around crack tips are generated (Fig. 1c).
78
(a) (b) (c)
Figure 1. Domain discretization: (a) generated Voronoi cells (𝛼 ≈ 1), (b) Delaunay Triangulation and
generation of lattice elements (𝛼 ≈ 1), and (c) mesh refinement and defined cavity (𝛼 ≈ 0.5)
79
pore pressures are measured. The fluid pressures in each timestep are dependent on the bulk modulus
of the fluid, volume of the cavity, and the excessive fluid mass that has been rushed into the saturated
cavity.
Δ𝑚𝑓
𝑃𝑓𝑡 = 𝑃𝑓𝑡−1 + 𝐾𝑓 𝑡 if Sr 𝑡 = 1, 𝑃𝑓𝑡 = 0 if Sr 𝑡 < 1 (6)
𝜌𝑓 𝑉cav
In the 3D flow model, artificial cavities are generated between each pair of neighboring Voronoi
cells. Then, the Delaunay Triangulation approach is implemented to generate the conduct elements.
The coupling of the hydro-mechanical model is based on the weak coupling scheme, where the fluid
pressures in the cavities are transferred into the mechanical model. Afterward, the emerged hydro-
mechanical deformations are transmitted into the hydro model.
5 Numerical Studies
5.1 Crack Initiation and Propagation under Monotonic Loading
The numerical simulation of the frack propagation in a 2D domain under the constant confining
stress and zero hydraulic pressure is presented in Fig. 2. The deviatoric stress is gradually increased
(Δ𝜎𝑣 ) till the frack process initiated. The change of the displacement wave field (along x-axis) before
and after the fracking process is shown in Fig. 2b.
(a) (b)
Figure 3. Fluid flow in geomaterials: (a) boundary condition, and (b) saturation of artificial cavities
and flow channels in three timesteps
80
simulated (Fig. 4). In the first cubic sample, the fluid injection direction is perpendicular to the
layering orientation. In the second case, the fluid injection direction is parallel to the layering
orientation. The results indicate the dependency of the fracking and flow paths on the defined
embedded layering orientation of geomaterials, like what can be found in shale and claystone.
Figure 4. The 3D hydro-mechanical lattice model and simulation of fracking surfaces (shown with
red) in a heterogenous geomaterial: fluid injection (a) perpendicular to the layering orientation, and (b)
parallel to the layering orientation. (experimental tests of Opalinus claystone [7])
6 Conclusion
The presented lattice model in this study is capable of simulating crack initiation and propagation,
pressure driven percolation and pore pressure diffusion in the coupled hydro-mechanical problems.
The inherent stochastic irregularity that exist in lattice models is ideal for simulation of the fracking in
geomaterial, as it can account for irregularities that are present in particle scale. The 3D simulation
results depict the ability of the lattice model to simulate the realistic fracking and flow paths in a
heterogenous geomaterial. Beside the qualitative studies that are presented here, a quantitative analysis
of the lattice model outcome is under development.
Acknowledgments
This research project is financially supported by research grant ‘’GeomInt2’’ provided by the Federal
Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Germany with a grant number of 03G0899B.
References
[1] Wangen, Magnus. Finite element modeling of hydraulic fracturing in 3D. Computational
Geosciences. Mars. 1-13, 2013.
[2] Yoshioka, Keita & Chukwudozie, Chukwudi & Bourdin, Blaise. A Variational Phase-Field Model
for Hydraulic Fracturing in Porous Media. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.
347. 957-982, 2019.
[3] Marina, S., Derek, I., Mohamed, P. et al. Simulation of the hydraulic fracturing process of
fractured rocks by the discrete element method. Environ Earth Sci 73, 8451–8469, 2015.
[4] Rizvi, Z.H., Nikolić, M. & Wuttke, F. Lattice element method for simulations of failure in bio-
cemented sands. Granular Matter 21, 18, 2019.
[5] Rizvi Z.H., Mustafa S.H., Sattari A.S., Ahmad S., Furtner P., Wuttke F..Dynamic Lattice Element
Modelling of Cemented Geomaterials. In: Prashant A., Sachan A., Desai C. (eds) Advances in
Computer Methods and Geomechanics. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 55. Springer,
Singapore, 2020.
[6] Grassl, Peter. A lattice approach to model flow in cracked concrete. Cement and Concrete
Composites, 31, 7, Pages 454-460, 2009.
[7] Kolditz, O. and Görke, U.-J. and Konietzky, H. and Maßmann, J. and Nest, M. and Steeb, H. and
Wuttke, F. and Nagel, Th. GeomInt–Mechanical Integrity of Host Rocks, Terrestrial Environmental
Sciences, Springer, 2021.
81