You are on page 1of 9

Motives for why an MNE might choose for worldwide growth as a Result of Acquiring

Enterprise refers to the situation in which an organization has properties or workers located in

much more than just nation in order to carry out a commercial transactional activity in those

countries. The aspiration to internationalize business operations can be traced back, at least in

part, to the widespread conception of globalization as a process through which the unrestricted

flow of goods, commodities markets, technological innovations, individual citizens, and

monetary capital across international borders binds together previously separate regions into a

single, unified economic system. In a similar vein, there are other factors that may contribute to a

company's decision to expand its operations on a global scale via the use of foreign partnerships,

joint ventures, or acquisitions. However, once a firm has reached a certain level of success,

expanding it often becomes more challenging. Although beginning a new venture is getting

easier to do, expanding an existing organization is typically more challenging. The expansion of

an established company is best accomplished via strategic partnerships, such as mergers and

acquisitions. It is also essential to keep in mind that mergers and acquisitions are subject to

regulation in many nations all around the globe and provide several advantages. Since these

marketplaces are riddled with difficulty and unpredictability, multinational corporations (MNEs)

that are on the lookout for opportunities to enter new markets are required to make important

entry decisions (Puthusserry, 2018). One of the distinguishing features of an MNE is that, despite

the fact that its corporate headquarters are situated in a single country, the company's industrial

production and functioning activities are dispersed across multiple nations. This is done for a

variety of reasons, including the pursuit of lower production costs, the acquisition of raw

materials, the utilization of available tax disparities, and the avoidance of protective tariffs.

The following is a list of some of the reasons why Acquisition should be chosen:
a) Mergers and procurements may lead to a wide range of tax advantages for the combined

companies

Countries will often offer tax benefits or reductions once a merger or acquisition is successfully

completed. For instance, Singapore is often regarded as one of the most advantageous countries

in Asia in which to complete a merger and acquisition. Significant tax savings may be realized in

this domain if the establishment of a firm in Singapore is accomplished via the merger or

purchase of a smaller operational entity.

b) the creation of fresh business possibilities

Approaching a new sector might be one of the most challenging difficulties a business owner can

face (Puthusserry, 2018). The procurement would save resources and time that would otherwise

be squandered on starting a firm from scratch. This is true even if it is a good idea to develop a

division inside the company.

b) Has the potential to acquire qualified human resources

One of the conditions that must be met before a firm may be merged with another or purchased is

that the current workforce must be maintained and incorporated into the new company. These

legal requirements were implemented in accordance with both domestic and international law.

d) Portfolio Diversification

One of the most important advantages offered by mergers and acquisitions is the opportunity to

seek a greater range of resources or items. This is one of the most significant benefits. Following

the completion of the merger, the combined business's portfolio will expand even more and

become eligible for a greater number of market share chances.

e) Mergers and acquisitions may lead to improved control and better financial stability.
Acquisitions provide possibilities for the parties engaged in the acquisition to achieve their goals

and become successful.

In addition to this, it would result in enhanced economic power as a consequence of the revenues

created as a result of merging the profits of both firms, which would yield a combined total of

(Puthusserry, 2018). As a consequence of the chain reaction, acquiring more financial resources

results in acquiring a larger portion of the market and achieving a higher level of control over

customers by reducing their level of demand.

1. helping speed up the expansion of existing businesses - A faster rate of commercial viability is

among the most important advantages of international integration. Entering new markets

overseas often results in a more rapid expansion for businesses. Through expansion of its

worldwide reach, the corporation brings its product or service to the attention of previously

untapped markets. It's possible that this may result in more growth as in hereafter.

2. To get a competitive edge - The expansion of our business into other countries urges us to

leave behind markets that are already fully served. Growing our business on a worldwide scale

enables us to connect with new customers and to operate in areas where our competitors are

unable to compete. A company's reputation may also be enhanced by engaging in international

business since actions conducted abroad can contribute to the development of brand awareness,

assist possible business scenarios such as deal commitments, innovate media methods, or even

promote growth.

3. The availability of investment possibilities abroad Lastly, companies that are contemplating a

foreign expansion should bear in mind the extra investment opportunities that are made available

by international markets. Numerous businesses are able to expand their horizons by entering new

markets and forming fruitful connections thanks to this opportunity. Multinational firms are able
to capitalize on enticing business opportunities that may not be accessible to them in their own

countries by investing in other countries.

4. Cost Savings - When a firm expands into a new nation, it has the potential to cut its

operational expenses and, as a result, increase its profits. Many companies have determined that

it would be profitable to move part of their manufacturing operations to other markets in order to

take advantage of the cheaper costs of labor and the greater availability of talent in other

countries. Although there are numerous advantages to joining an overseas joint venture, there are

also considerable fees associated with doing so. Some examples of these expenditures include

acquiring access to the local market and obtaining citizenship. HR professionals have a

responsibility to ensure that they receive adequate training to enable them to provide algorithmic

and substance guidelines to their chief executive officers at all three levels of the mergers and

acquisitions process, i.e. making plans, serenading, and trying to implement. This is especially

important for issues concerning thorough research, cultural relevance, and basic IHR post-

merger, program-integration concerns. The extent to which all of these things must be analyzed

and addressed, as well as the design of the solutions that are required, can be ascertained by the

organization's current intention and desired results, cultural environment factors, and so on.

Additionally, the design of the solutions that are required can be influenced by the design of the

solutions that are required.

Deliberations that are considered in making choices

When a corporation acquires an operational firm in another nation, one of the most

difficult challenges it has is incorporating the culture and traditions of the acquired company into

the parent company's operations. A new legal entity is formed if there is a foreign joint venture.

The formation of a new company with all of its measurements, languages, and traditions is the
primary objective of an international joint venture (IJV). The new organization will be modeled

after one or more of the partners, and it will be possible for it to be a fully incorporated entity

that incorporates the partners' ethos and practices. It is also possible to organize it such that it is

an entirely separate entity from the ethos and traditions of the partners. The following is a list of

some of the elements that have a role in the considerations about mergers and acquisitions:

1. The creation of value - A conglomerate involving two firms is one option for increasing the

value of the equity held by the companies' shareholders. In most instances, the combination of

two businesses results in the creation of synergies that increase the value of the newly created

firm. Synergy is defined as the situation in which the combined worth of two firms is higher than

the value of each company alone. Synergies may be broken down into two categories: revenue

synergies and cost synergies.

2. The pursuit of diversity- it is a common motivation for mergers, which are undertaken often

for this purpose. A company may utilize a merger to diversify its operations by entering a new

market or supplying new products or services. This may be accomplished via the utilization of

the merger. It is normal practice for the management of a firm to negotiate a takeover agreement

in order to diversify the risks involved with the operations of the company.

3. The acquisition of assets - A merger may be prompted by the need to acquire properties that

cannot be obtained via any other measures. When conducting M&A transactions, it is highly

usual for some organizations to organize mergers in order to get access to assets that are either

uncommon or that need a significant amount of time to cultivate on their own.

4. For reasons related to taxes A firm that generates a significant amount of taxable revenue may

decide to merge with another business that has a significant amount of unused tax loss
carryforwards. Since the merger, the net tax burden that would be borne by the combined group

would be noticeably lower than the tax obligation that would be borne by the current firm.

The option that is in the best interest of the companies

The phrase "international strategic alliance" refers to a partnership between businesses

that are headquartered in different nations. A multinational strategic alliance will concentrate its

efforts on either a single activity or a collection of related endeavors. In most cases, it is referred

to be a collaboration between businesses that are headquartered in separate nations. The

worldwide strategic alliance may be broken down into many different categories, such as

franchising, licensing, management information system, procurement, research & innovation,

manufacturing, and advertising, and so on. In the context of strategic alliances, the sharing of

information and experience between partners, as well as the reduction of risk and costs in areas

such as supplier relationships and the progression of new goods and technologies, are all

essential components. Consider the business alliance that exists between Uber and Spotify, for

instance.

The cooperation involving Spotify and Uber is one in which both parties can benefit.

Although uber passengers are given the ability to control the audio, these two companies are

expanding their user bases as a direct consequence of their relationship. Thus, according to Mr.

Kalanick and the chief executive of Spotify, Daniel, came to an arrangement with each other and

established a scenario in which both parties benefited. In principle, strategic alliances provide

firms with the opportunity to pursue one-of-a-kind strategic interests that neither would be able

to achieve on their own if they pursue these objectives separately. When it comes down to it,

when you pick up a new ride through the Uber app and are matched with a vehicle that can

stream music, you'll be able to correlate with Spotify and choose between pre-made playlists,
your own playlists, or anything else you'd like to listen to. This feature will become available in

the near future. You will have wireless access to the music if you are using the Spotify or Uber

app while you are in the air. Both companies tried to form an alliance in order to acquire a

competitive edge in their respective markets. Both Uber nor Spotify compete in markets that are

very competitive and in which customers may easily stop using their services and start using

those of a competitor. As a consequence of the collaboration, uber customers will be required to

pay for Premium subscription over other providers, while users of Spotify premium will be

encouraged to use uber over other ride-sharing platforms. uber consumers will also be obliged to

pay for Spotify premium over other services. The strategic partnership between Uber and Spotify

has the potential to produce a win-win scenario that will allow both companies to acquire a

competitive edge.

Associations or partnerships on a global scale, whether formally and informally, that do

not lead to the establishment of a distinct legal organization are what we mean when we talk of

international alliances. They provide possibilities to broaden one's skillset and enter new sectors

at little cost and with minimal risk. The most major motivations for the formation of

multinational alliances are development, access to technology and research capabilities, and

entry into new markets. International partnerships, as opposed to IJVs and IM & as, are the

effective and cheapest volatile opportunity to grow and start creating or accumulate resources

and strategies; there is also no dilution of share price, neither threatening harnessing of the

financial statements, and no lack of talent if they are managed properly. In addition, there is no

shortage of talent because there is no dilution of stock. If the terms of the contract are not met, it

is also possible to terminate the agreement.


The corporation would be wise to pursue an alliance as their method of choice for their

most successful worldwide growth plan (Banalieva, 2013). Collaborations are agreements in

place for collaboration or collaboration among those enterprises, with the ultimate result

becoming a relationship whereby each organization ultimately benefits more from the

arrangement than from personal decisions alone. This is because the end result of a partnership is

a correlation in which each organization stands to benefit more from the arrangement than from

personal decisions alone. For example, the worldwide alliance between Nissan and Renault is a

perfect example of the value of alliances. This alliance enabled Nissan, a company that was on

the point of going bankrupt, to stand on its own two feet and avoid filing for bankruptcy. Since

the company's founding, Renault and Nissan have both allocated a significant portion of their

budget to the training and education of 1,500 of their workers in regards to the culture of Japan,

whereas just 400 of their employees have been educated in regards to the culture of France. It is

a constructive first step in forming a coalition that spans several cultural backgrounds. Both the

Japanese and the French would have a greater knowledge of the other's point of view if they

were to observe the other's business history, customs, and background. This would allow them to

avoid misunderstandings and work together to reach a common objective.

Conclusion

The procedures of integrating two or more organizations into a single organization are

known as mergers and acquisitions. The process of combining two businesses into a new entity is

referred to as a merger, while the act of one company gaining control of another is referred to as

an acquisition. The buyer and the seller will talk a lot about valuation since it is such a

significant aspect of the mergers and acquisitions process. In a similar vein, a cross-border

alliance and collaboration between two corporations based in separate nations make up what is
known as an international strategic alliance. Knowing the varied product life cycles, such as a

slow cycle, a standard cycle, and a quick cycle, is one of the many distinct reasons for strategic

partnerships. There are many other reasons. It contributes to the enhancement of ongoing

operations and the modification of the existing competitive environment. The worldwide

marketplaces provide a wide variety of investment opportunities to companies who have the

intention of exporting or importing products on a global scale. Companies that participate in

international trade grow more quickly and have fewer setbacks as compared to those who do not.

Therefore, companies intend to expand their operations overseas and enter foreign markets for a

variety of reasons. The diverse goals at the point of entrance might result in differing strategies,

success expectations, and even market participation patterns in certain cases.

References
Banalieva, E. R. (2013). Home-region orientation in international expansion strategies. Journal

of International Business Studies, 44(2), 89-116. Retrieved from

http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2012.33

Puthusserry, P. N. (2018). International new ventures market expansion through collaborative

entry modes. International Marketing Review, 35(6), 890-913. Retrieved from

http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IMR-01-2017-0001

You might also like