Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Various treatment methods for odontogenic keratocysts second premolar region (Fig 1). Scalloped margins were
(OKCs) have been reported ranging from conservative also shown in several areas of the lesion. The right canine,
the left lateral incisor, and the left canine were displaced
to radical surgery.1-8 Because of its nature and high
laterally. In the axial computed tomography (CT) scan, a
recurrence rate, the treatment goal of OKC is the pre- well-defined intrabony soft tissue lesion was observed with
vention of recurrence. Therefore, more aggressive sur- expanded and thinned buccal and lingual cortical bones.
gery including resection of the involved bone with bone Discontinuity of the bone was observed in some areas of the
graft or aggressive curettage of the cystic bony cavity has lesion (Fig 2). A decompression technique was undertaken
not only to reduce the cystic size but also to reinforce the
been recommended.2,4,5 Moreover, when a surgeon thin cortical surface. Two holes were made and rubber
considers the ideal strategy for reconstructing the defect tubes were placed for decompression. On the 15th day after
related to an OKC, it might be difficult to select the best surgery, a custom made decompression appliance with 2
option from resection with bone graft, enucleation with tubes was applied (Fig 3), and the patient was taught how
bone graft, or secondary bony regeneration. Because of to self-irrigate frequently using a 30 cc syringe and normal
saline. A dramatic reduction in the size of the lesion and
the complications after radical treatment, marsupializa- remodeling of the adjacent bone was noted in an orthopan-
tion or decompression has been suggested as a more tomogram and CT scan 1 year after the initial surgery (Figs
conservative treatment even though there is the neces- 4, 5). Subsequently, residual enucleation and curettage of
sity of frequent follow-ups.1,3,6,9-12 However, decom- the cyst were carried out without any bone graft. The final
pression for a large OKC is a simple modality for induc- biopsy at the time of definitive surgery was OKC, which had
partial transformation of the lining into normal squamous
ing new bone formation. epithelium. The follow-up CT after 18 months (Fig 6), and
During the last 3 years, 2 cases of large OKCs involv- the 2 years and 6 months’ follow-up panoramic radiograph
ing the mandible were treated conservatively with a showed complete bone healing (Fig 7).
special appliance for decompression, and bone regener-
ation was induced successfully without recurrence. CASE 2
A 21-year-old woman presented with a large OKC ex-
tending from the right mandibular ramus to the left first
Report of Cases molar area with scalloped margins, an impacted right
canine at the symphysial region, a horizontally impacted
CASE 1 right third molar displaced superiorly, and the external
A 39-year-old man presented with a large OKC of the root resorptions of the right first and second premolars
mandible extending from the left second molar to the right (Fig 8). The CT scans revealed that the cortical bones of
FIGURE 10. One year after decompression, a decreased size of the FIGURE 12. The 2-years and 6-months’ follow-up panoramic radio-
cyst was observed in a panoramic radiograph in case 2. graph in case 2 showing a disappeared lesion.
Jung, Lee, and Park. Decompression of Large OKCs of the Man- Jung, Lee, and Park. Decompression of Large OKCs of the Man-
dible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005. dible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005.
cryotherapy for an OKC has also been recom- supialization, it can be a suitable treatment modal-
mended.8,17 Otherwise, a more conservative ap- ity for an OKC. Brondum and Jensen6 and Marker et
proach such as marsupialization or decompression al12 reported that the histologic transformation af-
with or without secondary enucleation was suggested ter a cystotomy for decompression and enucleation
for treating OKCs.3,6,9-12,18 The recurrence rate after afterward showed that decompression changed an
conservative treatment was reported as low as those aggressive to either less aggressive OKC or to a
rates comparable to other procedures except for re- nonkeratocyst of 44% to 60%. This histologic trans-
section.4-9,12,15,16,18,19 formation and decreased size of the cyst make it
Marsupialization implies that the oral mucosa is easier to complete the secondary enucleation. How-
allowed to fold into a defect and is sutured to the ever, the first case of the 2 presented cases showed
cyst lining; thus the cystic epithelial lining is trans- partial transformation of the lining into a more
formed into normal mucous membrane by evagina- normal epithelium after decompression but final
tion from an adjacent area.13 If the transformation pathologic diagnosis was OKC. In the second case,
of the cystic epithelium and the reduction of the the cyst lining both before and after decompression
degree of keratinization of an OKC are ensured by was similar and showed OKC (Fig 13).
long-term decompression as a modification of mar- Decompression or marsupialization, as a conser-
vative treatment for a large OKC, can save the
anatomic structures including the adjacent teeth,
the inferior alveolar canal, and the maxillary sinus.
By relieving the intracystic pressure, the size of the
FIGURE 11. One year after decompression, follow-up CT scan in FIGURE 13. In case 2, the final microscopic feature after decom-
case 2 showed a thickened bone wall and a smaller cystic lesion. pression showed OKC, which was similar to before decompression.
Jung, Lee, and Park. Decompression of Large OKCs of the Man- Jung, Lee, and Park. Decompression of Large OKCs of the Man-
dible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005. dible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005.
LIM ET AL 271
cyst is reduced, which can induce the eruption of 8. Schmidt BL, Pogrel MA: The use of enucleation and liquid
nitrogen cryotherapy in the management of odontogenic ker-
impacted teeth and new bone formation.3,6,9-12,17 atocysts. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 59:720, 2001
Recently, the treatment regimen for large kerato- 9. Nakamura N, Mitsuyasu T, Mitsuyasu Y, et al: Marsupialization
cysts has been changed to this conservative method for odontogenic keratocysts: Long-term follow-up analysis of
to save the vital structures.9,12,17 The disadvantages the effects and changes in growth characteristics. Oral Surg
94:543, 2002
of decompression are that 2 surgical procedures 10. Eyre J, Zakrzewska JM: The conservative management of large
are needed and it requires a longer period of time.12 odontogenic keratocysts. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 23:195, 1985
11. Cranin AN, Madon S, Payans E: Novel method of treating large
cysts of jaws in children. N Y State Dent J 60:41, 1994
References 12. Marker P, Brondum N, Clausen PP, et al: Treatment of large
odontogenic keratocyst by decompression and later cystec-
1. Meiselman F: Surgical management of the odontogenic kerato-
tomy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 82:
cyst: Conservative approach. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 52:960,
1994 122, 1996
2. Williams TP, Connor FA: Surgical management of the odonto- 13. Kruger GO: Textbook of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (ed 6).
genic keratocyst: Aggressive approach. J Oral Maxillofac Surg St Louis, MO, Mosby, 1984, pp 255-280
52:964, 1994 14. Salman L, Salman SJ: Decompression of odontogenic cysts. N Y
3. Olson RE, Thomsen S, Lin LM: Odontogenic keratocyst treated State Dent J 34:409, 1968
by the Partch operation and delayed enucleation: Report of 15. Stoelinga PJW: Long-term follow-up on keratocysts treated ac-
case. J Am Dent Assoc 94:321, 1977 cording to a defined protocol. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 30:14,
4. Farmand M, Makek M: Late results following the Brosch-proce- 2001
dure for treating large mandibular ramus cysts. J Maxillofac 16. Voorsmit RACA, Stoelinga PJ, van Haelst UJ: The management
Surg 11:211, 1983 of keratocysts. J Maxillofac Surg 9:228, 1981
5. Bataineh AB, al Qudah M: Treatment of mandibular odonto- 17. Jensen J, Sindet-Pedersen S, Simonsen EK: A comparative study
genic keratocysts. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol of treatment of keratocysts by enucleation or enucleation com-
Endod 86:42, 1998 bined with cryotherapy. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 16:362, 1988
6. Brondum N, Jensen VI: Recurrences of keratocysts and decom- 18. Zhao YF, Wei JX, Wang SP: Treatment of odontogenic kerato-
pression treatment: A long-term follow-up of forty-four cases. cysts: A follow-up of 255 Chinese patients. Oral Surg 94:151,
Oral Surg 72:265, 1991 2002
7. Myoung H, Hong SP, Hong SD, et al: Odontogenic keratocyst: 19. Blanas N, Freund B, Schwartz M, et al: Systematic review of the
Review of 256 cases for recurrence and clinicopathologic pa- treatment and prognosis of the odontogenic keratocyst. Oral
rameters. Oral Surg 91:328, 2001 Surg 90:553, 2000