1. Does this journal connect with something else that you have read? Why?

Answer= Yes it does. This one I chose relates to other journals I've read with the tittle
Predictive accuracy of the Braden Q Scale in risk assessment for paediatric pressure
ulcer: A meta-analysis. It happened because the topic or keyword I was looking for on
a special website for international journals had many similarities with other journals.

2. Does it give you some new knowledge related on the subject? Why?
Answer= Yes it does. This journal gave me new knowledge about the importance of
early detection in patients at the PICU using the Braden Score method.

3. Is the abstract good enough? Why?

Answer= Yes it is. The abstract has summarized the main problems, objectives,
methods, data, and conclusions from the topics raised.

4. Has the journal explain the gap related to the previous researcher?
Answer= Yes it has. This journal has been explained the gap relate with another
journal.

5. What question would you like to ask the researcher? Write a sentence!
Answer= Thank you for writing this research, it is very useful especially for me as a
health student. There are a few things I want to ask you:
1. What problems did you encounter during the research?
2. I am very interested in the research you are doing, do you have any suggestions for
me if it raises the same topic?
//