Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AN ANALYT ICAL ST UDY OF IMPACT OF MARKET INGST RAT EGIES OF COMPANY IN DEVELOPIN…
ismail has
A Mult ilayered Net work Securit y Framework for Managing Malware - Managing People not Machines
Christ ine Simfukwe
Syst em on chip design service e-business value maximizat ion t hrough a novel MCDM framework
yo Sip
Int. J. Management and Decision Making, Vol. 7, Nos. 2/3, 2006 143
Yu-Jing Chiu
Department of Business Administration, Chung Yuan Christian
University, 200, Chung Pei Rd., Chung Li 32023, Taiwan
E-mail: chiou.yu.jing@yahoo.com.tw
Hsiao-Chi Chen
Institute of Management of Technology, National Chiao Tung
University, 1001, Ta-Hsueh Rd., Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
E-mail: angela77.mt90g@nctu.edu.tw
Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng*
Institute of Management of Technology, National Chiao Tung
University, 1001, Ta-Hsueh Rd., Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
Joseph Z. Shyu
Institute of Management of Technology, National Chiao Tung
University, 1001, Ta-Hsueh Rd., Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
E-mail: joseph@cc.nctu.edu.tw
Reference to this paper should be made as follows: Chiu, Y-J., Chen, H-C.,
Tzeng, G-H. and Shyu, J.Z. (2006) ‘Marketing strategy based on customer
behaviour for the LCD-TV’, Int. J. Management and Decision Making, Vol. 7,
Nos. 2/3, pp.143–165.
1 Introduction
A new application for Thin Film Transistor Liquid Crystal Display (TFT-LCD) is LCD
Television (LCD-TV). LCD-TV has become popular in consumer electronics within the
household television market, as a result of rapid technology development. Display
Search (2002) forecasts that LCD-TV demands will expand quickly at a compound
annual growth rate of 104% from 2002 to 2007. LCD-TV has huge potential for the
future. However, manufacturers of LCD-TV focus on technology with little regard for
customer needs. Therefore, we attempt to study customer behaviour in order to reduce
the gap between technology and customer-needs. Customer behaviour is defined in this
study as buying behaviour.
Marketing strategy based on customer behaviour for the LCD-TV 145
Little attention has been given to how customers evaluate products resulting
from the convergence of television sets (Roberts et al., 2002). Hultink et al. (1995) noted
that pricing and skimming strategies are used to successfully launch high-tech products.
Previous studies show that marketing strategies of high-tech products are interesting
issues, and have been in high demand. This is particularly true when customer behaviour
and market strategy extend to the next generation product, making LCD-TV a critically
important issue for high-tech manufacturers.
Marketing strategy is critical to corporate planning and is dependent on the study of
technology, product, channel, customer behaviour and so on. When suppliers consider
increasing their investment in customer relationships, principal concerns include
potential benefits from such an investment (Anderson et al., 1991) and the likelihood of
receiving rewards from customers for collaborating in product development. This
illustrates how product and market strategies of a corporation are influenced by customer
behaviour. As this supply-side-driven trend occurs, consumer perspective becomes
critical in evaluating the likely market acceptance of new product categories, giving
individual buyers a complex behavioural role. Managers should be acquainted with
customer needs in order to effectively stimulate additional market needs. Burger and
Cann (1995) found that improving customer satisfaction and adding value to customers
in high technology purchases are very important factors for technology-based
organisations. We propose customer-orientated thinking for technology-based firms and
marketing strategy planning based on research of customer behaviour.
Managers usually make strategic decisions according to a single purpose or
dimension. However, strategy is influenced by many corporate factors, especially
marketing strategy. The traditional concept of strategy lacks a multi-dimensional
emphasis. In this paper, the DEMATEL method is used to build the relative relationship
of decision factors for customer buying behaviour. The relationships support a
multi-level viewpoint for planning strategy.
This paper is organised as follows. Section 2 introduces the TFT-LCD industry
development, LCD-TV, and a brief review of customer behaviour researches. The model
construction and implementation are shown in Section 3. An empirical study of LCD-TV
in Taiwan is presented in Section 4. Finally, conclusions and recommendations are
presented in Section 5.
This section presents the TFT-LCD industry development, LCD-TV, and a brief review
of customer behaviour researches. The TFT-LCD industry development and LCD-TV
can assist us in understanding the big picture and environment of this industry.
In addition, we discuss customer behaviour trends to describe the importance of customer
needs.
for improving colour quality and faster refresh rates was first commercialised for
large-sized displays in the early 1990s. The TFT-LCD market is segmented by
panel size into small, medium and large. The large-sized segment is defined by
DisplaySearch (2000) as panels that are ten inches and above in diagonal measurement,
representing the largest part of market value. Large-sized TFT-LCD panels are primarily
used for notebook computer screens and computer monitors with a new application of
LCD-TV, designed in size, from thirteen to over forty inches in diagonal measurement.
The LCD-TV offers a different technology from the traditional Cathode Ray Tube
(CRT) with advantages of low radiation, low power consumption, slim size. A
comparison table of LCD-TV and CRT’s characteristics is provided below (Table 1).
LCD-TV has been unable to increase its market share due to its high price.
However, there is growing evidence of a trend that LCD-TV will replace CRT-TV
(DisplaySearch, 2004). Technology advance of large TFT-LCD panels and the glass
substrate’s broadening tendency will reduce manufacturing cost (Deutsche Bank Group,
2004). DisplaySearch (2002) proposes that the LCD-TV market will increase as
TFT-LCD producers build fifth and sixth generation factories, which can reduce
large-area display costs. ING estimates (2003) that the driving factors of LCD-TV
adoption are:
• lower prices
• regulations enforcing the migration of broadcast TV from analogue to digital
• proliferation of personal TVs used as supplements to the household TV.
Tracey et al. (1999) studied the relationship between firms with a high level of advanced
manufacturing technology and greater customer satisfaction. Technology should be
studied while analysing high-tech products, as extensive strategy distribution depends on
technological intellectualism. Diagonal technology, size, resolution, aspect ratio, contrast
ratio, luminance, frame rate per second (fps), interface type, power consumption, and
viewing angle are critical technological issues in the LCD-TV industry. Therefore, slim
size, low radiation, and low power consumption are advantages of the LCD-TV.
Diagonal technology, resolution, aspect ratio, contrast ratio, and luminance are the result
of resolution of kinescope. Frame rate per second in kinescope is another technological
Marketing strategy based on customer behaviour for the LCD-TV 147
indicator for the TV user, as well as a satisfactory size. Additionally, inner functioning,
product design, and other functions of LCD-TV are included. Resolution of kinescope,
frame rate per second, size, inner functioning, product design, and added functions are
six key criteria for consumer buying behaviour applied to technical aspects of this study.
The implementation process includes four steps. They are data collection, customer
preference analysis, measuring the relationships among customer decision factors, and
marketing strategy planning. The details about the four steps are as follows:
Step 1: Data collection.
The data is collected from questionnaires. The questionnaire is designed to match the
research objective. A random sampling is adopted in this study.
Step 2: Customer preference analysis.
We can know the customers’ preference by analysing the collected data. Data regarding
their comprehension levels of LCD-TV, willingness to buy, information source, preferred
brand, possession rate, motive, buying place, etc are collected by asking the customers,
relevant questions. Through these questions, we can illustrate customer preference and
basic information.
Step 3: Measuring the relationships among customer decision factors.
The DEMATEL method is used to analyse the customers’ decision factors. It is a kind of
structural modelling approach. It is a comprehensive method for building and analysing a
structural model involving causal relationships between criteria. The special questions
formed are designed for DEMATEL. An example is shown in the appendix.
Step 4: Marketing strategy planning.
When we know the customers’ preference and relationships among customer decision
factors, we can make intelligent marketing strategy plans. We must integrate the above
information to provide a synthesised marketing strategy plan.
There are five subsections of customer behaviour that provide clues to marketing strategy
in the LCD-TV market. The subsections include a questionnaire and data sampling,
customer preference analysis, measuring the relationships among customer decision
factors, and marketing strategy planning.
Marketing strategy based on customer behaviour for the LCD-TV 149
Details about the DEMATEL method are introduced in the Appendix where we explain
the DEMATEL method step by step.
Step 1: Notations
Notations used in this section are as follows:
Step 2: A customer evaluates the relationship between a pair of factors for decision
factors in the questionnaire. The initial direct-relation matrix Z is a 16 × 16 matrix
obtained by pair-wise comparisons in terms of influences and directions between
decision factors.
Step 3: The normalised direct-relation matrix X is obtained through equation (A2) and
equation (A3). The normalised matrix of direct relation is shown in the Appendix.
Step 4: The total-relation matrix T is calculated by using equation (A4). The matrix of
total relation is shown in the Appendix.
Step 5: Using the values of D (sum of rows) and R (sum of columns) in the matrix of total
relations, a level of influence and a level of relation are defined. Based on Definition 5
and Definition 6, a causal diagram is created through equations (A5), (A6) and (A7).
The features of each decision factor are visualised as the oriented graphs. In this study,
we adapt the threshold value (p) as 0.39 to obtain the total relationship. 0.39 is the most
appropriate value to acquire a suitable relationship from trying above and under 0.39.
The value under 0.39 gains too many factors and complex relationships in the whole
system; the relationship is not obvious above 0.39. The key decision factors and
relationships are obtained from the total-relation matrix (Table 5) and the influence
degree of customer decision factors (Table 6). The causal diagram of total relation of
customer decision factors is shown in Figure 2.
154 Y-J. Chiu, H-C. Chen. G-H. Tzeng and J.Z. Shyu
Symbols Di + R i Di – Ri
f1 9.868 1.124
f2 10.040 1.630
f3 10.114 –1.019
f4 9.979 –1.012
f5 9.898 0.902
f6 9.942 –1.043
f7 9.870 –1.333
f8 9.989 –1.974
f9 9.847 –1.069
f10 9.790 0.173
f11 9.814 –0.150
f12 9.702 0.165
f13 9.965 1.103
f14 9.908 0.328
f15 9.797 0.881
f16 9.819 1.294
Notation:
Symbols Contents
f1 Price
f2 Quality
f3 Brand
f4 Function
f5 After-sale service
f6 Size
f7 Sales exposition
f8 Advertising
f9 Channel
f10 Good design idea
f11 Innovative ability
f12 Slim
f13 Low radiation
f14 Low power consumption
f15 Frame rate per second
f16 Resolution of kinescope
156 Y-J. Chiu, H-C. Chen. G-H. Tzeng and J.Z. Shyu
Results show that ‘Quality (f2)’ is a powerful factor and plays a main role, because
the value of (Di + Rj) and (Di – Rj) is very significant. On the contrary, ‘Advertising (f8)’
is negatively influenced by the other factors, because the value of (Di – Ri) is
negative and the value is also significant. At the same time, we find the causal diagram of
total relationship shows the same results – ‘Quality (f2)’ is a very powerful factor
affecting other factors and ‘Advertising (f8)’ is the factor which is intensely affected
by the others.
In view of the causal diagram of total relation, there are four main factors,
• Quality (f2)
• Advertising (f8)
• Sales exposition (f7)
• Brand (f3).
Quality (f2) plays the key role in total-relation, while the other three factors are intensely
affected by other factors. Quality (f2) directly affects Brand (f3), Function (f4), Size (f6),
Sales exposition (f7), Channel (f9) and Advertising (f8). Quality (f2) is the base on which
to develop Brand (f3). If the quality is good, Brand can be driven to be good;
simultaneously, it is bad. Function (f4) and Size (f6) are two parts of the whole product.
They are also developed, based upon quality. In addition, the marketing channel is
affected by quality. When there is good quality, there is a good channel. Each retailer
wants to sell good quality products. It is necessary to manufacture high quality products
to establish a good relationship with retailers. The same concept can be explained in the
relation between Sales exposition (f7) and Quality (f2).
Marketing strategy based on customer behaviour for the LCD-TV 157
Brand (f3) plays the main role in product strategy. Other product characteristics are
included. They are Function (f4), Size (f6), Low radiation (f13), and Resolution of
kinescope (f16). Sales exposition (f7) is a key factor successfully affecting sales strategy.
Sales exposition (f7) has an interaction relationship with Price (f1), Low radiation (f13),
and Resolution of kinescope (f16). As Channel (f9) also affects sales strategy, we put it in
this cluster. Furthermore, advertising strategy includes Price (f1), After-sale service (f5),
Low radiation (f13), Frame rate per second (f15), and Resolution of kinescope (f16). They
are the distinguishing features of LCD-TV except for Price (f1); so it is clear that
adverting strategy should focus on the LCD-TV characteristics.
The framework explains noticeable issues and interaction in marketing strategy
planning which can help marketing managers to plan suitable marketing strategies with
limited resources. Correct strategic aspect in firms is adopted to support substantial
management in the future.
References
Anderson, J.C. et al. (1991) ‘Partnering as a focused market strategy’, California Management
Review, Vol. 33, pp.95–113.
Assael, H. (1987) Consumer Behavior and Marketing Action, Kent, Boston.
Burger P.C. et al. (1995) ‘Post-purchase strategy: a key to successful industrial marketing and
customer satisfaction’, Industrial marketing Management, Vol. 24, pp.91–98.
Da Silva, R.V. et al. (2002) ‘Assessing customer orientation in the context of buyer/supplier
relationships using judgmental modeling’, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 31,
pp.241–252.
Deutsche Bank Group (2004) ‘CY04 TFT-LCD industry outlook’, May 6.
DisplaySearch (2000) DisplaySearch Introduces New Report that Pinpoints LCD Pricing Trends,
May 3.
DisplaySearch (2002) Forecasts Predict Notable Increase in LCD Market, September 26.
DisplaySearch (2004) Large-Area TFT LCD Shipments and Revenues Reach Record Levels in
Q2’04, Double-Digit Revenue Decline Expected in Q3’04, September 1.
Engel, J.F. et al. (1995) Consumer Behavior, 8th ed., Dryden Press, Fort Worth.
Gruner, K.E. et al. (2000) ‘Does customer interaction enhance new product success?’, Journal of
Business Research, Vol. 49, pp.1–14.
Hill, H. P. et al. (1962) Sampling in Auditing, Ronald Press, New York.
Hori, S. et al. (1999) ‘Designing methods of human interface for supervisory control systems’,
Control Engineering Practice, Vol. 7, pp.1413–1419.
162 Y-J. Chiu, H-C. Chen. G-H. Tzeng and J.Z. Shyu
Hultink, E.J. et al. (1995) ‘How to launch a high-tech product successfully: an analysis of
marketing managers’ strategy choices’, The Journal of High Technology Management
Research, Vol. 6, pp.229–242.
ING estimates (2003) TFT-LCDs – LCDTV: The Next Big Thing, November 18.
Kohli, A. et al. (1990) ‘Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial
implications’, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54, pp.1–18.
Kotler, P. (1967) Marketing Management Analysis, Planning and Control, Prentice-Hall,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Kotler, P. (1988) Marketing Management, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Kotler, P. et al. (2001) Principles of marketing, 9th ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Lear, R.W. (1963) ‘No easy road to market orientation’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 41,
pp.53–60.
Levitt, T. (1960) ‘Marketing myopia’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 38, pp.45–56.
Liu, H. et al. (1997) ‘Market orientation in UK multiple retail companies: nature and pattern’,
International Journal of Service Industry Management, Vol. 8, pp.170–187.
Narver, J.C. et al. (1990) ‘The effect of a market orientation on business profitability’, Journal of
Marketing, Vol. 54, pp.20–34.
Peter, J.P. et al. (1993) Consumer Behavior and Marketing Strategy, 3rd ed., Irwin, Homewood.
Roberts, J.H. et al. (2002) ‘Assessing market structure and company fit based on consumer
perceptions in dynamic information technology markets’, Journal of Business Research,
Vol. 55, pp.679–686.
Roscoe, J.T. (1975) Fundamental Research Statistics for the Behavioral Science,
Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Rust, R.T. et al. (1995) ‘Return on quality (ROQ): making service quality financially accountable’,
Journal of Marketing, Vol. 59, pp.58–70.
Sheth, J. (1994) Presentation to the 1994 Relationship Marketing Conference, Emory University,
Center for Relationship Marketing, Atlanta, Georgia.
Tamura, H. et al. (2002) ‘Extraction and systems analysis of factors that prevent safety and security
by structural models’, Proceeding of The Society of Instrument and Control Engineers Annual
Conference 2002 in Osaka, August 5–7.
Tracey, M. et al. (1999) ‘Manufacturing technology and strategy formulation: keys to enhancing
competitiveness and improving performance’, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 17,
pp.411–428.
Wang, V. et al. (1993) ‘Business orientations and corporate success’, Journal of Strategic
Marketing, Vol. 1, pp.20–40.
Weber, C.A. et al. (1991) ‘Vendor selection criteria and methods’, European Journal of
Operational Research, Vol. 50, pp.2–18.
Appendix
DEMATEL method
The DEMATEL method is based on a graph theory that enables us to plan and solve
problems visually, so that we may divide multiple criteria into a cause and effect group in
order to better capture causal relationships visibly. Directed graphs are more useful than
directionless graphs, because digraphs can demonstrate the directed relationships of
sub-systems. A digraph may typically represent a communication network, or a
domination relation between individuals, etc. Suppose a system contains a set of
Marketing strategy based on customer behaviour for the LCD-TV 163
elements S = {f1, f2, …, fn}, and particular pair-wise relations are determined for
modelling with respect to a mathematical relation E. Next, to portray the relation E as a
direct-relation matrix that is indexed equally on both dimensions by elements from the
set S. Then, take out the case that the number is 0 appearing in the cell (i, j), if the entry is
a positive integral that has the meaning of:
• the ordered pair (fi, fj) is in the relation E
• it has the kind of relation regarding that element fi causes element fj.
The digraph portrays a contextual relation among the elements of system, in which a
numeral represents the strength of influence (Figure A1). The A, B, C, D and E represent
the factors which have relations in Figure A1. The number between factors is influence
or influenced degree. For example, an arrow from B to A represents the fact that B
influences A and its influenced degree is three. The DEMATEL method can convert the
relationship between the causes and effects of criteria into an intelligible structural model
of the system. In order to apply the DEMATEL method smoothly, we refined the version
used by Hori and Shimizu (1999) and made essential definitions as below.
Definition 1: The pair-wise comparison scale may be designated into four levels, where
the scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 represent ‘No influence’, ‘Low influence’, ‘High influence’,
and ‘Very high influence’ respectively.
1
s= n
(i, j = 1, 2,… , n) (A3)
max ∑ zij
1≤ i ≤ n
j =1
Definition 4: The total-relation matrix T can be acquired by using the equation (A4),
where the I is denoted as the identity matrix.
T = X + X2 + … = X(I – X)–1 (A4)
Definition 5: The sum of rows and the sum of columns are separately denoted as D and
R within the total-relation matrix T through the equations (A5), (A6), and (A7).
T = [tij ] (i, j = 1, 2,…, n) (A5)
n
D = ( Di ) = ∑ tij (A6)
j =1
n
R = ( R j ) = ∑ tij (A7)
i =1
where D vector and R vector denote the sum of rows and columns respectively.
Definition 6: Suppose Di. denotes the row sum of i-th row of matrix T. Then, Di. shows
the sum of influence dispatching from factor i to the other factors both directly and
indirectly. Suppose R.j denotes the column sum of j-th column of matrix T. Then, R.j
shows the sum of influence that factor i is receiving from the other factors. Furthermore,
when i = j, i.e., the sum of row sum and column sum (Di .+ R.j) shows the index of
representing the strength of influence both dispatching and receiving, that is, (Di + R.j)
shows the degree of central role that the factor i plays in the problem. If (Di – R.j) is
positive, then the factor i is rather dispatching the influence to the other factors, and if
(Di – R.j) is negative, then the factor i is rather receiving the influence from the other
factors (Tamura et al., 2002).