' i e! H 1 tC a A SUPPLEMENT TO | LATE ROMAN POTTERY HY J. W. HAYES THE BRITISH SCHOOL AT ROME LONDON 1980Publi by the BRITISH SCHOOL AT ROME 1 Lowther Gardens, Exibiion Road London SW7 2A © to A Supplementary Volume of the Tri School at Rome SSN oyoy-2762 ee MM G6 Printed it Gras Briain by Hf Printers Ld Cabridge CONTENTS page Acknledgenents v SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY: ADDENDA vi LATE ROMAN POTTERY: ANOTHER TEN YEARS 479 MAJOR NEW DEPOSITS 48 AFRIGAN RED SLIP WARE 484 OTHER AFRICAN WARES 5a ‘LATE ROMAN C” WARE = ‘PHOCAEAN RED SLIP WARE! 525 CYPRIOT RED SLIP WARE 528 GYPTIAN RED SLIP WARES 530 GAULISH WARES AND DERIVATIVES 533 OTHER LATE ROMAN WARES sat VARIOUS RELIEF WARES 235 Aalenda to Appendis I: Sve Widogeaphy © 1968-69 537 Append: Selected recent literature (1969-78) 539 CORRIGENDA TO LATE ROMAN POTTERY 548ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS friends who have been of assistance to me over the last ten years, and whose ames are not recorded in the Preface to the original edition. In particular, T thauk Drs. J. and A, Alateio and their colleagues for enlightening me on the finds from Portugal, and for supplying me with copies of works which had previously escaped my notice. Profs. J.G. Pedley and J. H. Humphrey (University of Mich gan) Kindly invited me to participate in their excavations at Carthage, and I have earned muich from the work of the various teamsin the current UNESCO-sponsored series of excavations there, which, when finally concluded, will add greatly to our Knowledge of North African pottery in general. Dr. A. J..N. W. Prag and Mr. J Rifle have kindly made available to me the collections in Manchester and Birming- ham, and have supplied additional information on them; Prof. D. Adamesteanu and dessa. E. Lattanzi have done likewise a Matera, For the Caesarea material [am indebted to Prof, R. Bull, for that from Ruoti (Potenza), to Prof. A. M. Small Mrs. J. Bird has supplied information on finds from Britain. Dr. P. M. Kenrick, Dr, F, D'Andria (Lecce), and Dr. Marie-Odile Jentel (Québec) have, among oth sent me copies of their works, Others who have assisted in various ways include, in Britain, Prof, L. Alcock, Me. P. J. Fowler, Dr. M. R. Pulford, Mrs. E. Haney Mr. J. May, Mrs. M. Rule, Dr. A! Use, Me. A. Siggins (Dublin), and the stalf of the Jewry Wall Museum, Leicester; abroad, Dr.,J- Frank (Chicago), Dr. K. T, Lackner (Toledo), M. P. Dupont (Lyon). ‘The continued assistance of many who contribu ted towards the 1972 edition is dutifally acknowledged, I "TAKE the opportunity of thanking here a large number of colleagues and J. W. Haves ‘Toronto, February 1979SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY: ADDENDA A, ONPREHENSIVE plement the bibliography in Late Roman Pottery (LRP), updated to 1972/3, is provided by S. Tortorella in Ostia ite (Rome, 1973) 387-40;8¢e this for minor publications and references co some works not Available to me.” Only the principal publications since 1968 and some earlier works omitted in LAP are listed below; other references will be found in the Text below. ‘The titles of some Eastern European aud Greek publications are transliterated, stancho (1963-4) J. and A. AlatcXo, ‘Crimea Estampada Vermelia de ‘Gonitmbriga’, Ari de Bria, xxcxxi (1963-64) 81-100. stancko (1966) Jeand A. Alurcto, © Espolio da Nectopole Luso-Romana de Valdoca’ (Aljuste)’, Caninbrige (1966) 7-104, pls. T= XXXVI, acer axp Ntmaeven (1976) 1 Bakker and HG. Niemeyer, “Foxes, informe reliminar sobre la campana de excwaciones et 1973', Kors eign Ric Arg (190) 99-19, swith 1a psi text sxosssane: (1967) 1. Baklssarte, "Le cerauiche dle necroplilougobarde di 21 Umbra e Castel Troxina’, Alle Meduee (Veneria—a lel Centro Internazionale delle Arti ¢ del Cestume) i (1967) 145-8, naraver (1y66) J. Baracer, "La edramique rouge orangée et le commerce tnéditerranéen “da Tau V" sitle’, eter de go” Congrs rational des scidés saantes (Nice, 1965), section @erchilogie (Paris, 1966) 271-90, with 9 ph. in tex. aanaere (1974) F, Baratt, La coupe & Vaurige vaingueur (sglée claire) du Musée da Louvre, Bulletin del soit nationale des cmtiguaires de France, 974, «98-95; ple. XXI-XXIV. seo (1977) J. Bird, “Afican Red Slip Ware in Roman Britain’ in (ed. J Dore and K. Greene) Remen Poltery Studies in Britain and Beyond Papers prewented to lola Gillam, Jay 1977 (British “chaolgial Reports, Suppl Series 303 Oxford, 1977) 269-77 noniwu (1972) A. Bonin, ‘Catalogo della ceramica *sigillata chiara africana” ddel Museo di Cagliari’, Studi Sardi xxii (1971~2) 5-70, pls. TIX. nourcross (1969) A. Bourgeois, “Phas & relief applique de Beto’, AMélanges de dzquez v (tog) 31-725 With 12 pls. in text ersctast (1975) E, Bresciani, ‘Rapporto preliminare delle campagne di scavo 1968 € 1969, in Mission di scaxe a Medinet Madi (Fayem— E,gits), 1968 ¢ 196i (Universita di Milano, ‘Tesi © documentiSELEGY BIBLIOGRAPHY: ADDENDA Yer oo ds Ani, Milano, 97) 9-6, nh Bole exnatanno zouins (ig74) Te Caballero Zoreday “Cerimicasigilata cara de tipo “Di esampada de lat provincie de Mtn y Almera Miszeléee Arquatgiee (RV dict dels Cases “Amparias) Barcelona, 974) tgg-2ee eanaxonne (1976) AU Carandin, ‘Stora dl tna krma ceramic afieana, Un aap Suen sialon (rns autor Sud Micelle a a menor cd lnoa Bee (Rome, 1970) 45-86. eanavow (1977) AY Garandini, “La terra sila alficana La eeramiea. a patina eeneragiols e orld annerito di eth imperale’ in sree donescim di Exolae «Ponerinae imperil (Quad atramaterate Rome 1977), vit émusoints (1974) T Groin “Nala moditeransih adionica w Bi jhova tronologis’ = "Funde mediteraser ‘Toepercien in Bosnien tnd der Herzegovina snd he, Chronaogies in Matar VII Simpori = (Zena, 971) 79-00, with German text pp. 8-9 bstoapo (1g6;) — M. Delgo, “Tera sgilaa clara de Config’, Conindrige Mi 1g) apctsb wi pin te wxtoavo (1968) M. Delgado, "Tern sigilataelora de Museu do. Alentgjo © Algarve Coinbrign vit (468) 42-66, py LU brsenvo (ors) ME Dea ase les tn fof. Abc and Exienne) Roles de Contre (Pars, 1935) 249-00 Ds LXU-LXXXL i ian DineAUvE (1972) J. Deneaive, “Céramique et ampes alfeaoes sur Ia ote de Provence’ Angus afenines vi (S972) 219-27, pbs EE eweauve (1974) J. Deneaune, “Un apoio paleochvien sur in oline de Byrst& Carthage dnt afr vi (1974) 199-96 Mylo, Keli, La oto opt (Rechte suis archéo- loge eoptey Gentve, 1979) sewatnn (1976) ME onl Lat Mars Péifee der Ame tt National @Archéologc et @PAet: Bibtosnoque, ta is Tans ; 178). See expecially 159-6, le. CXCI-CRCIX Pseaoton at Carthage. Michigan iy v2 ede J, He Tlumpley) Pacasatins Gartoge 1975 Goo. iv: tg76} conducted by te Unie. of ‘Micigen (Tunis, 1076), tan (An Arbor, Mich. 1978) ; ‘Aricles by J. W. Hayes and J. A, Riley. évanes (1976) AA, Fer, ‘De Seta Contmbrign en passant par FOrent, Goninbriga (1078) 3-72 les de Conintriga iv: eth J. Aare and Re Benne) Ful de Goningriga Le sgt (Pari 1979). See under Me Dead. conmnist (1974) Le Gueerin, "Materia ceramit, in. dntine (1995-196) Mision Arcsin bn Ei da Unies Roma Universi xavorr (1977) m SELE cuény (1968) utry (1970) ) aves (1973) oukay (19; aves (1976) 21 BIBLIOGRAPHY: ADDENDA degli Studi di Roma, 1974) 69-113, figs 15-66, pls. 26-49 For Red Slip Wares, sve 70-81, figs 15-10 pl. 26-37. R. Guéry, ‘Notes de eéramique’, Bulletin darchiloie algimne (1968) 271-81 R. Guery, ‘La texte sigilée elaite “D” de Rasquniae (Tamed- foust)’, Bull. d'arch, ala. (1970) 277-95 R. Guiry, Nouveau ragients de plats reel cite’, BABesch svi (1972) 14-24 J. W. Hayes, “The Roman Deposits. 2 The Pottery, in J Toardman and J. Mayes, Exeaations at Tora 1965-106 i, The Ancaie Depeits ii and Later Depasts (British School at Athens Suppl. Vol no, 10, wth the Society for Libyan Studies; London, 1973) 108-19, pls. 52-53. JeW. Hayes, Roman Poly in the Reyel Ontario Museum: a cate: Tague (Toronto, 1976) igulaires de erre uiaves, in Apollonia, the Pot of Gyrene: J. W. Hayes, “Notes on the Palace Pottery’ in aves (1977) R. G. Goodchild, J. G. Pedley, D. White et al. (ed. J. HL Humplicey), Apollonia, the Port of Cyrene: Excavations by the Univesity of Mickigan 1965-1967 (Supplements to Libya Antiqua iv; Tripoli, 1976-—issued 1978) 260-5, J. W. Hayes, ‘North African Flanged Bowls: a problem in Tith-century ‘chronology’, in (ed. J. Dore and K. Greene) Roman Pottery Studies in Britain and Beyond: Papers presented to Joh Gillam, July 1977 (British Archaeological Reports, Suppl. Series go; Oxford, 1977) 279-87. see also Excavations at Carthage ... Michigan (above). xxs (1972). Husong and H. Cuppers, Die Trier Kasether men: die spatromische und fruhmitlalterlche Keramik. (Trierer Grabungen und Forschungen, i, 2; Maing, 1972). yacquat-coxnon (1972) H. Jacquet-Gordon, Les ermitages cétens di der Bona ii, Céramique objets (Inatinut Prangais ’acchéologie osientale du Gaize; Cairo, 1972). Joos axp roxsiest (1967) A. Jodin and M. Pousich, ‘Nouvelles observations sur la goons (1971) exnsck (1978) astmocuan (1974) Lancet (1970) Seeamiqnextmpr tn Maree nomsin’ Bila Pcie inarocrie i 87) 4997-546, with pl. TV ‘Auodtin, Les fle de Marian (Core) a: La tre sige cae la eramique estan arse ~ Cabs Conca ix-xt (Basi, to71)._ Gt pps with ps intext P.M. Kenrick, “A Summary of Dated Deposits, i (ed J. A Lloyd) tevations af Sidi’ Kreis, Benghnei” (Berni) Supplement to Lib nina v, voi (ipa, 1977/8) sg NuLambogta,‘{ problem atta delta ters sgllata chiar Talia o Attica? im Aguila Pica (At dla qurt setinana asta Apuleist, 28 rile nme 1973) ~ AnthtaAlo aiatck ¥ (Udine, 1974) 119-31 Lace, “Fipastana IVs occidentale ropole romain!T BIBLIOGRAPHY: ADDENDA de Ia Porte de Ceésarée: rapport. préliminaice’, Ball. d'arch algéieune be (1470) 149-266 (expecially 229-41) sotinas (1974) $. Lollies, “Cafermo i, La eeramica (Pabiicazions dello Studium Bibliewn “Jerusalem, 1974), sp. Terra prcudo-sigillata", pp. 65-ti 106-85, 210-32, with pl in text ToverdowTsigaridas, ——_“@padoyars hwy paroxpioniauixay Blox ord Mouosio Mnevdr), Aehriov iB Xponicwnys. "Apxctodoyin “Ereupelas +. (1960-9) 229-46, pl. 96-10, (vacious authors) Seavi di Luni}, Relazione prolininare delle campagne di scavo 1970-1971, & ura li A. Frova (Roma, 1973). For sections fon ARS and related wares, sce cos. 457-95, 404-10, 707-0, 36870, ps. 67-70, 72, 107-8, 452, 45H, 158) 170 Ml, 240, 205 {by E. Rofia,C. Chiaramonte Trere, ky Merzagora Conca). unit: (various authors), Seasi di Lani i, Relacione delle campagne di save 19} 973-1974 (Roma, 1977), especially pp. 16, 40, 15-70, 180-7, 379-86, 478-94, 496-501, pls. 110-124, 158 top, 191-192, 200-7, 247-261, 264 (by E. Roflia, M. P. Lavizzari Pedrazzini, G. Sent Chica, C. Chiaramonte Trer) manyoun (1970/73) A. Mahjoubi, “Les fouilles, in A. Mahjoubi, J. W. Salomonson, aud A. Enoabliy La nisopole romaine de" Raggada (Unsitat ional d'Archdologic et Art, Collection notes et doct- sents vith fase, 1-25 1 3). 7-22 (in fase photo 139, 26 pp. plates (erogularly numbered HT-LI 6. uaneriy (1969) G. Martin, “Consideraciones sobre la tera sgillata hispania, ity la sigillata clara en Marruceas’, Papler del Laloratorio de Arqueloin de Valencia vi (1060) #5175 6. uaetty (1975) G. Martin, “Un vaso de sgillaa clara en el Masco de Alicante’ Revista da Institute de Estudios Alcomines xe (1975) 1097-26 + wana (1976) T. Martin, “La sige claire D dur Barrow Lllein de la Socité Buds Scenifiqus de Ste esa region vil (1978) 85-102 v. auanris (1977) T. Martin, ‘Quelques formes inédites de sigillee claire D’, Figtna it (2979) 97-106. we (1/0) ML Munteana and G, Papuc, “La eéramique Tomaine tardive A décor estampé découverte & Tomb, . Pontica ix (1976) 147-54, with 6 pls. Ostia ii, ii, iv: A. Carandinl and C. Panella (cd.), and vatious authors, Ostia i, i, iv (Shuli Miscellan’ 16, 21, 23; Rome, 1970, . 1973, 1977). rautanis (1972) F. Pallaré, ‘Problemi della terra sigilata chiara decorata (Hipi A, C.D)’, in I problemi dele ceramica romana di Ravenna, dklle Vatepadana ¢ deal Adriaco (AM del convegno inter. narionale, Ravenna, 10-12 maggio 19693 Bologna, 1972) 43-57. vatot (1967) PB. de. Palol, (‘Ceramica con decoracion estampaday ch relieve’, in) Arqulogta cristina de te Espasa romana: silos overnos (1969) Lani a), ). SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY: ADDENDA. IV-VE (Uspaia Cristiana, serie: monogrética: Monumentos, Sol I; Madi and Valladolid 1967) 360-6, pls. CXI-CXV. rarvc (1973) __G. Papuc, ‘Ceramica romana tirzie cut decor stampilat deseo perta la edifcul roman eu mozaie din Tomi’, Pontica (Con- stanta] vi (1973) 153-92. emake siat (1974/7) M. G. Pereira Maia, ‘Sigillata clara com decoragio ‘aplicada de TrOia, Setibal’, O Arquedlogo Portagué® virix (1974/7) 365-76, with 5 pls. (-V) . paavsnere (1967) MW. Prawtnite, Exopations a Shei Zion: The Bary Ciristian Ghurch (Rome, 19675 Centeo per le antichith cla storia delate del Vicino Oriente: monogeafe di archcologia ¢ arte i)— Specifically “The Pottery’, 39-44, figs. 11-15, pb. XXXXV. nonennwice (1970) ML Redziewice, ‘Fragment painoantyezne) tacy 2 Pdi’, Rocenik Muza’ Narodotcg w Warszaie sw (1970) 251-60. novetewice (1976) -M. Rodiiewice, Aleandi |, La eamique romaine tardive d’Alex- andi (Varsovie, 1976). satomonsos (1968). sce ZRP- satononson (1970]73) J. W. Salomonson, ‘La eéramique’ (pp. 25-81 fase. 2, 2 patie, pl. E-XIII),in A. Mahjoubi, J. W, Salomorson aud A. Bnnabl, La ncropote romaine de Raggada (ost. Nat. Arch, et Aart, Collection notes et documents vi fase. 1-23 Tunis, 1970, 1973). satomonson (1971) J. W. Salonionson, ‘Roman Pottery—a source of information ior historians and archacolgist’, BABexh xl (4971) 179-02. satonoxsow (1973) J. W. Salomonson, “Kunsigeschichtliche und ikonographische ‘Untersuchungen 21 cinem Tonfragment der Sammlung Benaki in Athen’, BaBeseh xiv (1973) 3-82. satowoxsox (1975) J. W. Salomonson, in Klasioe Kunst wit Pastialir Becit (exhibi- Vion eat Leiden, #975). satonoxsox (1976) J. W. Salomonson, in Romizche Kliskunst: Sammlung Kart Lifer (Rrnisel-Germanisches Museum, Kolo, 1976), vveoas (1975) M, Vegas de Wigg, “Tafelware aus Munigua: Grabungskam- pagne 1973', Madrider Mitilungen xvi (1973) 281-302, pls. 58-60. voza nivrrox (1971) G. Vora Pipitone, ‘Ceramica ardo-imperiale nella ‘Sicilia orientale’, in AU del 1° Congress Nazionale di archelogia cristina, 25-31 maggio 1969, Matera ... (Rome, 1971) 493-75, with 14 figs: in text.LATE ROMAN POTTERY: ANOTHER TEN YEARS close of the initial phase of the study of the later fine wares of the Roman Moditerranean, pioneered by scholars such as Lamboglia and Waagé. My text was compiled in 1968-60, just at the moment when a spate of new publications ‘was in the course of appearing. Sucl works as J. W. Salomonson’s studies of the classes of Affican Red Slip Ware with applied and relief decoration,! and the Ostia series compiled by A. Carandini and his colleagues could not be fully utilized in Late Roman Potiry, since only minor alterations to the text were possible during the proof stages. Thus the work may be considered as a survey of the current state of Knowledge in about 1968, incorporating the results of my personal researches in, primarily, the eastern regions of the Mediterranea. ‘Over the last ten years the study ofthis field may be sad to have passed through a second phase, exemplified by the works of the authors eited above. One feature of this has been’ the appearance of specialist articles on particular eategories—eg. the Alrican wares with applied motif. Alongside this has conve an enormous upsarge in the number of excavation reports —above ll from the western Mediterrancan—vwhich have paid attention to their later Roman pottery. Pottery studies have gained favour, and “erra sgillata chiara’, alias ‘sigilata africana’, in its various eases, has now become patt of the stock-in-trade of archacologists Irom Italy westwards, "Not all of these excavation reports have shown the same concern with canexis as, for instance, Carandini at Ostia; in some eases competence in identifying finds has clearly oustripped an understanding of stratigeaphic principles in digging. Hence the amount of usefil new information provided by the reported finds—such as may, for instance, contsibute to refinements and eortections in the proposed ehronology— ja not quite commensurate with their quantity. The thet of the mere presence of some easily recognizable type on a site in a region where itis already well attested cannot be said to add significantly to the sum of knowledge; the empliasishence= Forth must be on closely datable assemblages, quantitative studies and the testing of the validity of our identification of wares by petrological and similar analyses A more disturbing consequence of the greater interes in the wares in question is that certain categories—in particular the Afvican wares with decoration—have become collectors’ items. For this those of us, including myself, who have laboured to identify and clasify them must, reluctantly, share some of the blame for having popularized them. ‘The more pity, since most of them are sill only halfunderstood 4 Salomonon (168) (19656):406Bisioraphy in # Osa iv (Sal Mivellnd 0,10, 26, 295 Le. Rome fi, 17081973, 17 Te publication of Late Roman Pottery in 1972 may be said to have marked the{ j | | io: SUPPLEMENT TO LATE ROMAN POTTERY and, though providing meat for the student of iconography, the new—generall tnprovnanced-—specimens do nothing to resolve the outianding questions of dating, entiation of sours, ete. Indeed, ore Gs rom actual paler? works stops may have een dispersed in this manner without a record being kept of ete preci fnspot: ane may cite examples of plaster moulds for ARS appliques and Jans which have appeared on Uhe market ver the last few years The most that canbe sid on thee behalf that thse specimens prove points of reference against which to compace excavated sherds, and eich ay help to familasize a geeaer sumer of ftire archeologists with the wares i question a funetion unchanged from a century ago! ‘na more hf note eal easements of the hse work, sme by the original authors, have now begun to appear; one may ele ardcles by Lambogtia= nl eran the printed venon oe rouble din at Coin ta75 a which most of the protagonists were present To thee L now venture to a ea contribution. “ ® ‘ what ofthe future? One looks frward to tied phase in the investigation of te Late Roman wates—not log to be delayed, one Carnstly hopes then & filly iterated approach (ie stylist, stratigraphic, quantatveand cletivey) chemicalpetrograplical is adopted by all excavators of Mediteresnean ses. "The fic eximpes of ths appeoach eral forth rewsting ofthe economic history othe region, ar now begining to appear seu et at ernie psa ae reay ayes ak a ee Ie litt tS sn fot Egil Tipo ne elas TR" [Shia toe etl dea en i ios Ars (nena gan et Minit w Cos vor) fi tia ase, "PEA re, “be Sit 4 Cnintg, hal tp) it CEs Ds papa his ih Seg (Fel Rel ie ry tng PUR pe Sa ame eo fig; Coins and Antiquities Ltd. (London), Lit no. gi imbriga iv (1975) 5-102 ene (8) AN" Gp Peta exapin OMAN MY CT) MAJOR NEW DEPOSITS finds from the Athenian Agora and the Antioch excavations, and, for the material of early date, Lambogtia’s studies. ‘This inevitably led to a less balanced picture than would have been obtained if larger sample of sites producing datable material liad been available: the evidence for certain periods was more reliable than for others. Tt remains true that, aller another ten years’ work, one pperiod-—the 5th cencury—continues to pose severe problems,* while two others (the tid ged eentiary and the carly Justinianic period) are particularly well documented, For the mid grd century, an extensive destruction deposit from the Sidi Khrebish ‘excavations at Benghazit supplies an intermediate stage between the group of. 240 {rom the Terme del Nuotatore at Ostia,2 mentioned briefly (but not fully analyzed) in LRP, andl the Ax, 267 (Herulian) assemblage in Athens. ‘The Ostia deposit remains the earlist to have produced the fine TS ehiaralafricana Cin quantity, along side late examples ofthe A ware. The A ware forms are still quite well represented in the Benghazi group, while the Athenian Agora finds are almost exelusively of the Co variety. ‘Though the difference eould be partly due to geographical location, an carlier date for the Benghazi group than for the Agora ones is indicated —e. a.D. 25 ‘The Justinianie period (¢. 520-50) is now represented by sealed deposits from several sites in addition to the Antioch find (.b. 526) and certain groups from the ‘Athenian Agora, ete, Contemporary with the Antioch finds is the material (admittedly fragmentary) from the construction levels ofthe church of St. Polyeuktos in Constantinople (publication by Hayes, forthcoming), with a erminas ante quem of ‘A. 526/7. cistern group from Samos, published by Isler,and dated by coins of the second quarter of the 6th century (pre-538), has produced Late Roman C ware similar to examples from deposits of the period in the Athenian Agora. Another ‘good group of this period was found at Caesarea (Israel) in 1974, sealed between two Supetimpesed mosaics;* this contained reatoruble examples of varioue fine wares in astociation with amphorae and glass. Another large depesit of similar (or perhaps Ts chronology proposed in Late Reman Pottery was heavily dependent on the of thas are touched om fn my rent Lien Stars Thid dana Rat, 1971-72 01, ‘North Alam Flanged Wawra pecicssin and Rowih ena Aepot, ro7eg 4. “Cte Ticntry ehroulogy an Roman Peey Stes Sogo 8 date sory afer. 24g) (Ted pot ‘nh en ies rid Sole ile (Contry 9-8 TEN Renee, ia Ruwais a Si Kbit ngs (Bos) (Spo Lae dan 9 ‘Tiel sori song ine dept 10-3, Tone tober 19. Fall ubiaion a he fd iStheoning. "For ecininury notes TW. ‘Tandem snd]. Ar lay Te Sy for " Caran ty Oui (96) SHR ee craton vo Samos ee Gchby. rantche ‘ice se Mit bene (0955) Song, no 8-98 soup erent being stad bya am er Pl Balls Dew Unive, Sado,a2 SUPPLEMENT TO LATE ROMAN POTTERY slightly earlier) date was found at Carthage in 1977, in ils associated with the early Justinianie(?) remodelling of the Circular Harbour." ‘A number of other deposits from various sites supply valuable supplementary dating evidence, From Ostia come a number of assemblages of the end of the 1st and the and centuries? ‘The recent work at Carthage has produced a number of fixed points forthe intial (purely local) development of ARS Ware and the associated couking-wares® Deposits from the Italian and British excavations there (public tion forthcoming) promise to add further precision to the dating of late 4thearly sth and late sthjearly Gth century types, while further finds from the University of Michigan's excavations (1977) have permitted the establishment of a sequence of developments through the 5th and early 6th centuries, though precise eoin-dates are not available for all the stages. Supplementary material of the late 4th and early 5th centuries is now available from Kellia in Egypi, showing more clearly the history of interrelationships hetween imports and local products in Lower Egypt. The finds from Conimbriga (Portugal) add a spectacular new dimension to our wnder- standing of the mid 5th century; a terminal date of A.n. 465 or 468 (the dates ofthe Sucbian invasions) fits all but a andl of the objects found there® Some deposits of the late 7th century from Carthage? help to pinpoint the end of the Late Roman, pottery sequence, which at Carthage, at any rate, must wow be considered to fall very lose to the Aral captuce of the eity in Gah Another new dimension has been added to the study of Late Roman pottery by underwater archaeology. In addition to the 7th ecotury wreck from Vassi Ada (Bodrum, Tarkey) cited in LIP, a lute 4th century wreck from the same locality has produced a mumber of fineware vessels? "The most valuable group of fine wares From a wreek site published to date is that from an early sth century site at Porte Miou near Marselle;! ARS wate in this instance clearly formed part of the earyo, rather than merely the chance postesions of the ercw of the ship. Though the number of examples of the Late Ronan fine wares 30 far recovered from wrecks remains fairly small, theicimportance i out of all proportion to their numbers, since they constitute ‘time-capsules’ of what was being used (or traded) together at a particular moment. Even a lew seraps from stich a context can affect our views on the dating of 2 pottery type (see for example the comments on the Torre Sgatrata tic ong) '4t pary vision ple Wiley Sen oe Bal Ie ta ‘Sec Gatton et a Ose ti pi fae 19 az alo Fan Dov WE SNe st Slip Ware fren in hn Ht 9 Saning (aon and Nw Wark, shape ad the reste of hei oon the sas ‘clout pl pom tan Sara al quae in Tibia Deneae, ti fas i (1978) a Up a Ca "Btn a Cartage ies EX fe sare area ARS Lvlgan 73, Ba, and Depts NI, NVIIE, dhs of Form Ga (var wenn), wit ome MAJOR NEW DEPOSITS. 485 finds, p. 515 below). A number of iolated finds offi ‘ware from other (undated) wrecks! are valuable in suggesting a chronological range for the weeeks themselves. ‘This whole field is one pioneered, in the West a least, by Lamboglia himself, who deserves full ereit for having realized its potentialities fig, Sst (1970) 19-15 (om the Ame Geral wreck, "PortVendta) Jo. Joncheray. hae al Jour of Net cays v's (Fey S577 Be in Carn ts Ghar tory, tit, ecally 427-5 (oo een) ata Mati or) te fe ligets ko Lambda, "Ried «seer Into ae Galina’ in A de 1 Cage Inaiale a Aba Sstomarin (Ale, 990) (oeighera, abs) igeeqnsce tint he te Ran war Tes lat, See ana (1094) a9: th nla or. ‘Son gn anther important ec depo fhe very ‘Stn dated by smerny) fal pie: Sion eh baat no speared Nix bots of Fort 9) and one af Fors yy these Se J ley’ rein» (atoming). SE Conde Cea) M. Delgo Eade Sopa ‘Pisin eel ap 0-4 ay Hayes Puttar Cre «Midian iv 40 Depts NF SAVE NE 65" el plesson of te wreck and Indieatem date forthe groupe around a. Gtorees (atowing for the sedating. sugges’ iam) Deneave’stugpeted ite ihied guaser of ceury, othe baie f'n ealy dating of the eps “a pst) cealy totaly teen il te ARS Tap mth ou ets Type wi few tanto md dye ut so lai pein of TypeAFRICAN RED SLIP WARE ‘TYPE SERIES: SUPPLEMENT Yow sow fet vatanis of one aleady Bare proce [ise ersthtgs ten te “Oh my mtr eed Se a a ey ane ina momen Seater)? ae en oP Stent omnes See ee es i eet ey bled neta Eber eer ee a pete Feet ee Ton ap ad yi Tre tC Cee es gma ike os ode scsed othe Manchester Muscum, and the Tunisian finds from the Pico(-Hamtezo Cee ee ne ee eed ba bo Sree Meee pian reer iene Esuopean collections; old unpublished specimens scen by mesince 1968 are presented Cee eee ee ee eee Cee earache aoe aay to cate Me ee vada the og canaguc arcbrough Cee ee eee actrees tp is nc at etal eaten cae Tort bibliographical references are appended to the general discussion. A few items are ‘drawn; these, as in the original edition, are indicated by an asterisk, and are repro- duced at 2:5 seale (stamps at 2:3). ‘sn tn elhcl Ged in LRP prove not have en widely ded wi ena a ag Gate peter ey each a ee pee ara glee rea ae eer Seen eee a cetcar bares ii Ry dena Wade ee nc ue” Sc ae a ane ite be decrees ds ns cows Pa 15,25, 35, 3, 38, 39-13; 475 5s Sts 55s 83 66, 74. 75, 77, 8B, 90, 91A, G2, 955 100- ae rons 26, late cersion A rather deep version with vertical rim|wall and in some cases spivalline-burnishing covering most or all of the inside. Commonly a chamfered band on the outside sen Bat at Cartage... Midian i * 6 17. Soe dco bow (Hur a3) Ppitone (4970 45 APRIGAN RED SLIP WARE. 85 between base and wall; the later is usually blackened (ef. Form 181), Late TS ‘iaralafricana A 2 fabric (cf. the late versions of Form 10 noted below p. 519), with very thin absorbed slip of line-burnishing covering the inside only. ‘Typical of the Garthage region; contexts (Carthage excavations) late 4th to about mid sth century Aa. With slip, and two pairs of grooves on floor: Hayes, in Excasation’ al Carlhage 1975 - « « University of Michigan i 68, fig. 8, no. 20 (late 4th century). niear-complete example of the line-burnished version in the Sperlon (unpublished; two ‘reserved" bands on outer part of floor), and others have been found recently at Carthage (see fortheoming publications). More or less standard versions of Form 26 may have continued in production until the mid 4th century: the evidence for them is still unclear, Some of Carops finds from Draria (1955, 234 type I) may be relevant in this context. ons 56, fltcbased variant {A flatcbased version of the shape with heavy beading along the rim, copying the hollow beading common on 4th-sth century silverware (see LAP 28-4), is repre= sented by a number of fragments from various places (sce nmtioeraray) and a nes complete example from Fites de Feira in Porwgal (Conimdriga xiv (1975) 15 pl. XD), the latter with impressed (not relief) decoration on the floor. ‘The relict ‘decoration characteristic of Form 56 proper is absent on these vessels, and their ware isles fine, corresponding more to that of sth century Carthage produets. Another Feature of thent is hollow fhiting round the inside of the wall—again clearly borrowed from silverware, and matched on some other Carthage products (eg. Forms 12/102, 11o—see discussion below). ‘They appear to date from the frst hall of the sth century rors 67/71 {A aml undecorated version of Form G7, with the characteristic vim-profe, but Similar in i oocreatment al general proportions to Form 71, which should be ite counterpart in the fincsrare series. Not very common. "Late ath-—eaty sth century? For typespecimen, we Catalgue below. Delgado pubes frter Fragments from Cantabria, clasing them as C1D ware on aeewunt of tel thinness (Digan Four de Corig W204 27, Ms or 4, Pl, EX; ake Conim. Igatnv Go) 4, ple 10}, Designated Form 674 by. Mari, who hs pulled two weleproerved examples (atin (19/7) on, under forme NV.IT, figs 33,52) rons 760 ‘This is defined mainly on the basis of a number of finds from Conimbriga (see Catalogue below for type-specimen; ako Delgado (1967) 62-64, nos. 85, 882, 93, pl. VIT, and Fouls de Conimbrigaiv 265,277, nos.92-96, pls. LXXI-LXXI) already cited as ‘Form 76° by Delgado. Form 76.6-7 (in LRP) go with them. The original Form 76 now becomes Form 764. ‘The new Form 76B is distinguished by the presence ofa small foot; the lip is generally grooved on the outer face and notched (or beaded) ‘along the top. Some published examples bear stamped decoration,486 SUPPLEMENT TO LATE ROMAN POTTERY “apparently in Style B (also Style C2). Some are very Iarge—a feature of other vessels with Style B stamps—; the Conimbriga pieces have estimated diameters ranging from c. 27-4 to ¢ 55:0 01. This shape should be a shallow counterpart of the bowls of Forms 70-74, and probably dates from the early sth century. Examples occur at Tipasa (Baradcz (1961) pl. 1482), pl. IV.25), and a number of base fragments from Conimbriga, some with unusual stamped patterns (Delgado, Falls de Conimbriga iv 270, afl2, nos. 152-6, pls. LXXV-LXXVI; Alaredo (1963/4) pl. TIL1-2) probably belong 16 the same form. FORM gt For new variants, see Hayes (1977). Form 91.28 now apy variant with a debased lion-head spout of which a number of fragments are known from Carthage and Sibari, An early variant in debased TS chiarajafricana A ware is present in late 4th century contexts at Carthage; this sometimes hears stragaly barhotine addons (rida spouts?) on the mange!” See elo for comments on dating. ars to belong to a large FORMS 959, 940 arias Ava iant of Form 93 with a thick knobbed rim and a low ledge-tike foot is present among the Sperlonga finds (sce Catalogue) and among those from the Anse Gerbil wreck at Port-Vendres (Martin (1977) 101~2, fig. 4-4, forme NV.IV); a smaller version of the same shape, corresponding to Form 9, bearing a single animal stamp, at the ceatre (lamb(2) 10 r., small) is also present at Sperlonga, ‘The fragment Vatican, Museo Sacro 1331 (LRP 279, Fig. 565, with rek, cited) should ako belong here. ‘These seem to be products of the Carthage region (or Oudnt2); the rim-type is matched by finds from Carthage (see Excavations at Carthage ... Michigan iv, 70, fig. 21, B 48—large, close o Form 103). A possible late sth century date is suggested by the stamps; however, the Port-Vendres specimen should he a good deal earlier. ‘The development of this shape remains to be worked out. A fairly low-footed specimen occurs in a late 7th century deposit at Carthage? Fors 12/102 ‘This designation supersedes Form 12. ‘The publication of a number of more oF less complete specimens proves that this Formis ate, belonging to the T'S.chiaralafricana D series rather than that of the and century. ‘The complete shape is a high-footed bowl, with the slip ending on the foot (el. slip-trcatment on Forms 93-102); it i apparently the forerunner of Form 102. Examples: xisay Museum; Lancel (1970) 295, fig. 76.8 (theve listed as “TS claire D. 6. 93, H. ¢ 7-0 (on basis of published drawing). Undecorated, Baclo (Spain), from destruction fill of Baths; F, Mayet, ‘Sigillée claire en {Hlaye,o i6,6nm ata and Mayen Baio a Meio i (venton "9 “Gt tho"Ae o'r Chee 49, RT ix-nit (1971) 12, no. 34, with fig, from Mariana, ‘ AFRIGAN RED SLIP WARE, 487 Bspagne: une forme comple indlite’, Md, Casa de Velézquez vi (1970) 433-43 Delgado, in Goninbriga xiv (1973) 73-4, £50, pl X.27. For its context, see furthee M. Delgado, in Fouilles de Conimbriga iv 268, with n. 76. D.. 9-7, H. 6.80, Undecorated. Groove inside rim. ‘The broad band of rouletting found on some examples, which originally (in the absence of contesteevidence) suggested a and century dating (see LRP 38), can now be seen to be the counterpart of that on the sth century Central Tunisian shape, Form 85, of which Form 12/i02 is the ‘Carthage’ counterpart. Form 110 should be the large version of the same shape, though its foot-profle has sill to be established; the broad bands of rouleting occur on this shape also. As an altemative (o roulett= ing, a band of vertieal gouging (a characteristic sth century treatment found on the wall of these shapes! copying more directly the fluting on the silver models for the type (se p. 520). The reclasfication of these forms has already been proposed by me in Exeasaions at Carthage .. . Michigan i 85-7. "The classification and dating of these forms are discussed in detail by Del Gonimbriga xiv 73-4 (with discussion pp. 79-84 passim), and Fouiler de Gonimbriga iv 267-4. ‘The phantom early ‘Form 12", whose existence was never proved, may now be eliminated from the record; no such shape existed in the and century. A 5th century and later dace for these bowls may now be regarded as established beyond doubt. Forms t2/102 and 110 are common at Carthage, oceurring in levels which faredated between the mid gth and the early 61h century. ‘They are also present in some numbers at Conimbriga, in contexts which should antedate a.p. 465/468. ‘A fragment of Form 12/102 is present ia the Cisterw’ group at Abu Mena (For whi see LRP 1.2, 131, 1445 375, e.). The sherds from Tipasa published by Baradez* could very well he of similar date; late sherds are not lacking on the site in question, ‘The evidence from these sites indicates that the date suggested in LRP for Form 110 should be brought forward to mateh those for Form 12/102. More precise dates for the related Form vo2 than those offered in LRP are stil lacking do, Fors 1520-0 An early jug from Pompeii with a peaked handle ending at the bottom in a ‘rattai” (Naples #61923 Carandini (1977) 23, pl. VIL. tg) appears to be another version of the shape listed in LRP as Porm 152. I propose to designate the Pompefi jug Form 152A. Two vesels from Tijussy will tathes different upawung hundle-form, (ancel (1970) 234, figs. 76.2, 77 6), scem related; one of them bears small stamps related to those on the beakers, Form 143. ‘Thereisanother example of the stamped type. in Cagliari (Boninu (2972) 67-8 fig. 42, pl IX. 1) Fig. gf, The typespecimen in LRP (no. 1) is now designated Form 152B; it may not be quite so early. Fora fragmentary etample, see Wares (1g) *arader (198) pl Lag-sbs 44. (on oe rt pi Lag ton 1) Note Barader eating abt pls FAV) are 1 Sef Deli n Contin nv (1975) #90501. Feit nara (50) ls TV 09 pp 274-2. ao-ag, anh Fu Gntige 26 c ayy "The shape ano secar nt ‘Teacane i Spain see fon sa, pl LXXIV-LXRV. Taisen ant Nisneyer (078) 98 LTT. q |488 SUPPLEMENT TO LATE ROMAN POTTERY 2 165, {afer Bonin, 1972) Seale vor 166 This is assigned to a two-handled flagon with low-belled piriform body and high bulging mouth, represented by two examples in the Cagliari collections (Bonin APRIGAN RED SLIP WARE, a (1972) 69, figs. 44-5, pl IX. 3-4): see Fig. 94. These lack any contest. Bonin is inclined to assign thems to the late and or early grd century, but the form corresponds to an Italian coarse-ware shape of the late 1st century: ef. Ostia ii 95, pl. XXTU figs. 401, 403-5 (context: ¢. A.D. 90), and pl. LVITI fig. 829. A lead-glazed version of the later is also known: sce Dressel, Annali Inst. corr. arc, liv (1882) 57, pl. D 1; Ballardini, Leeda ceramitica dllantico mondo romano (Rome, r964) 136, ig. 171, pl. XIb (= Walters (1908) K 17), and p. 144, fig. 186 (both dated far too lve). Tsuggest a Flavian date for the Affican type rons 160 ‘This is provisionally reserved for a spindly jug/flagon with rounded body, high tubular neck and cylindrical lower section with flauish base of which various fis rents have been found at Carthage i 5thyoth century contexts (see for instance Hayes, in Excavations at Cartage ... Michigan i 56, 59, 90, igs. $4, 14, nos. VIT. 36, 37. 39 VIII.2(2), B f-10). The handles of these-~apparently two, though one. inandlers may also be present—are heavy and strap-like, with several grooves. A heavy rim-moulding is present. ‘The ware is the normal Carthage africana D fabric with polished slip, Fons 169 Jugiflagon with circular fla-sided mouldmade body beating relief decoration on both Trees; wheelmade cylindrical foot and neck added, One or two handles. Rai Posibly Carthage products (to judge by the ware of 1 below); for neck- and base- treatment ef. Form 168. Presumably contemporaries of Form 56; the late 4th of carly 5th century date indicated by Salomonson for 2 below seems correct. Some 4ilisth century sherds were found with 1; the date proposed for it in the initial publication cannot be upheld Exanples 1. Carthage, Canadian excavations 1976, site 2, no. aGOy6[26-r215 F. Beauliew and M. Gazaille, in P. Senay etal, Cahier dis études anceme’ vi Carthage i (Montréal, 1976) 100, no. 544 photos 33-353 C. M. Wells, Clasial [Neus and Views] sor di monde classique xxi. (Jan. 1977) 17-185 L. New, id salt tia y70) toy MO, Jontel, RAGAR [Rese dart camadine| Canadian Art Review) $e. 1 (1977) 38-9, figs. 5, 7. D. of body 20°72. Neck and top of body mining. Recessed strainer in base. A. Achilles and Penthesilea; Fiexe of running animalsaround. B. Hercules and nude woman (Gragmentary); narrow ornamental border. Carthage ware? 2. Koln, Laffer Collection; J. W. Salomonson, in Romische Klzintunst: Sammlung Karl Liffer 157-8, v0. 611, ple 62.4. H.'22. Tall narrow neck, round sectioned(2) handle, narrow base. A. Bearded cloaked figure with scroll; impressed. (double-line) insription PAV LVS. Border: impressed palm= branch, with small eoss monogram at top. B. Centre plain; surround as on A "Termin kindly provided by Mis L. Near aes490 SUPPLEMENT TO LATE ROMAN PO Pethaps alo! 3. Catania, Castello Ursino (Coll, Biseati); G. Libertini, JU Museo Biseari (Milano/Roma, 1930) no. 859, p. 200, pl. XCVIT; Jentel, op. ci. 39, fig. 8. H.extant 23. Foot missing (badly restored), stumps of narrow neck and two hhandles above. A. Achilles and Penthesilea (cf. 1); border of impressed double circles. B. Hercules and woman (scene as on 1); border of impressed wheel-moti®, Clay buent(?) grey (a few pieces red), sip black ~this ware? ERY In addition to these, Martin (1977, fig. $.1,g) illustrates a rare variant of Form 598. with the rim profiled as on Form 67 (‘Form '594/67'), and a complete example ofthe type of my Form 93.1, which proves it to have a base-form similar to that of Form 52. ‘he latter example ean be dated to te earlier part of the 4th eentury on contextual evidence; its fabrie and that of the Lepcis find (Form 93.1) suggest a link with the porary Form 588, Some other hybrid lorms of the 5th century from the Vendres wreck are also illustrated by Martin (1977, figs 3-5. 41-2) ADDITIONS TO CATALOGUE (LRP Note: while every attempt was made in LRP to achieve complete coverage of the available literature on the ware, Fadit to having failed (0 note the Portuguese Titerature adequately. ‘These references are now supplied, together with any other omitted items which have come to my attention in the meantime, For items published after 1968/69, sce pp. 539-45. rons 3 [New specimen, Port 38 14 Raggads, tomb A 18; Salomonson (1968) g-99, fig. 14-1 (under type A1)5 Mahjoubi (1970/73) 14, ph. 14, pl. XII top (poorer drawing); Salomonson (1970/73) 35-6, tab. 11D, 18g. Found in asociation wih a Tate st (oF early and?) century lamp. [New specimens, Foro 398 15 Represas, Beja, Portugal; Delgado (1968) 49, ple UL a. Dee: 12. 116 Aljustrel (Baixo Alentejo), Portugal shi go, pl I. 12, Doe. 16. Fragmen- 117 Manchester Museum R923, from near Cap Bon, D. 196. Four straggly eaves. 118 Birmingham, City Museums and Art Gallery 1334°73- D. 19:2. Four poor leaves. .9 Sfax Museum, from La Skhira (unlabelled). Five leaves. 129 Tournus, Musée Greuse, Coll. Picot 328, from Tunisia (exact location un- Known).” Burnt, Five straggly leaves. AFRIGAN RED SLIP WARE, 49r vors 4 Naw specimens, Form 4A 19 Raqqada, tomb B 16; Salomonson (1968) go, fig. 14.2 (under type A 2); Mahjoubi (1970/73) 16, pl XXII top (bad drawing, diferent measurements sane veel); Salomonson (1970/73) 36-7, tbl. D. 163. Late; wall very splayed, Found with lamp fragments of and centary(?) type 20 Raga no context (10-1 excavations); Salomonson (1968) 108, figs. 10 (photograph), 23.2, type A 25 0; Salomontion (1970/78) 40, pl. VE Bg. 29 Dye2r5. Broad shallow vartut with fat floor (Form 4f29) Naw specimens, Fora 4B. ar Raggada, tomb B 20; Salomonson (1968) 99 (under type A 2); Mabjoubi (1970/73). 47. ple XXVIL top left; Salomonson (1970/73) 36-7. D. 175, Context: lamp, first hall and century. 22 Raqqada, tomb B 443 Salomonson (1968) 99; Mabjoubi (1070/73) 20, pl. XLIIT top right; Salomonson (1970/73) 30-7-D.177. Context: lamp, mid and century. New specimen, Form 5B 3t Ragqada, no context; Salomonson (1968) 10-2, figs. a.t, 17.1 (under type 8); Salomonson (1970/73) 39, Pl I fig. 8. -D. e. 15:5. Groove on wall ror 6 [Naw specimens, Form 6. 46 Manchester Muscura R 907, from Cap Bon region. D. 18. 47 Raqqada, no context; Salomonson (1968) 103, fig. 17-2, pl TL 46 (ander type A oa); Salomonion (1970/73) 39-40) pl. I fig. 10 (mislabeled “A 9). Dee. 19-5. Rather angular shape, with groove on wal (cf. Form 5). 4B Raggada, no context; Salomonson (1968) 102-5, fig. 17.3, pl. TL 2 (under type A gh); Salomonson (1970/73) 40, pl. HL fig: g (mislabelled ‘A ga’). D. 2.19%. Rather splayed form, with two grooves on lip. vous 7 Additonal reference 6 Tolmeita, Dept. of Antiquities, office no. 7 New specimen, Form 7 7 Manchester Museum R go, ftom Cap Bon region. D. 16-0. Two double Fines of rouletting. (Probably mid-and century.) vorw & New specimen, Form 84 36° Taranto, Musco Nazionale 22779, (No details noted.)492 SUPPLEMENT TO LATE ROMAN POTTERY FORM 9 Additional references 2 J.N. Dore and K, Greene, Archaeologia Actions iv (1976) 188, fig. 2.2 (alter profile in LRP); also reproduced by Bird (1977) fig. 20.2 on p. 271. Neo specimen, Form 9A. 25 Represas, Beja, Portugal; Delgado (1968) 46, pl 14. D. 6. 20°5. See discussion by Carandini (1976). Renumbered Form 12/102; ee discussion p, 486 above. rors 16 Net specimen, large variant 19 (Cited: LRP 42.) Raqquda, no context; Salomonson (1968) 104, fig. 18:5 {under type A 12); Salomonson (1970/79) 4t% ph. Lig. 1g. D. eth, ‘This may posibly belong to the 1st century series of forerunners to ARS; cf. Hayes, in Excavations at Carthage... Michigan i 8a, fig. 13, 47-8. New specimens, mal type 20-21 Vakdoca, Aljustrel, Portugal, graves 1, a8; Alarcio (1966) 8 (no. 1.2), 20 (00. 28.1), pl. I, IV. Detgysy 164. 22 Matera, Musco D. Ridota 13370, from S. Lucra a Bradano. D, 29-24 Matera 1520812, from Miglonico, Casa S. Rocco, D. 13, 157. 25 Matera (io number?), from Trione della Chiesa. D. 145 vow 18 Additional reference 3, Salomonson (1970/73) 44-5, pl TV fig. 22 (type A 20). For 19 Additional references 5, Carandini, in Ostia ii 413, pl. XCV figs. 1025-6. 6 Salomonson (1970/73) 41, pl. V top t. (lig. 12: eaption switched with item at top), under type Ais. 'D.e. 151. Perhaps from a mid and century group. New specimen 6 Aljustrel, Portugal; Delgado (1968) 54, pl. IT 12, Bst. D. 17, Pragments knob missing. As3. (Note: for other fragments of this type, see ibid. 55-6, pl. IL) APRIGAN RED SLIP WARE 493 aw specinen 4 (Gited: LRP 45,) Raggada, no context; Salomonson (1968) 103, fig. 18.1, pL IL (under type A 10}; Salomonson (1970/73) 40-1, pl V top (fig. 11 ‘aption switched with item at top nD. 15 Salomonson (oe, i.) ites another example ofthe form in Carthage (Lavigere, uneat). Fors 23 New specinen, Form 23 29 Matera, Museo D. Ridola (no number2), from Santa Candida. D. 1974 Rather poorly made and thick-walled. No blackening. No grooves on floor Forn 24 Additional references 2 Toynbee (1957) pl. IV is reproduced by Pallaés (1972) fig. 2 on p. 47- Listed under 78 chiara (AC, fore 955 the rectangular platiers become het form 43. Toynbee pl 1 = ibid. ig. 0n p. 48 (sce LRP 49, n, 1 for come ments) Additonal refirence + Pallarés (1972) 46, fig. 4. Listed under (A/)6 ware, form 49, rors 27 New specimen 12 Valdoca, Aljustrel, Portugal, grave a9; Alarcao (1966) 21 (no. 29.2), pl. LV. Max. D. 242. Worn; undecorated(?) row 29 Anal rfrone 3) Salomonson (1970/78) 45+ ph. VI hig. ai (ype A253). Pons $1 For the form, ef. the dish from Raggada, tomb B 26 (Salomonson (1968) 1155 Mabjoubi (1970/73) 18, ph. 29, pl. XXXII (centre); Salomonson (1970173) $3 D. 256, H. 40), classified by Salomonson as an early example of the fine-ware (7S chiara G) series of Form 50. Context: first half of grd eentury(2). rons 36 Additional references 1,2 Pallarés (1972) 44 fig. 1, fig. 1b,404 SUPPLEMENT TO LATE ROMAN POTTERY Form 39 Additonal reference 1 Bourgeois (1969) 42, pl. V2. vor 44 Additional references ‘To Salomonson (1968) 117, 119-20, add Salomonson (1970/78) 55. 57, types C5, Cr, pls EX-X figs. 40, 41, 433 Mabjoubi (1970/73) 13, pl. XIU bottom ew specimens 14 Vila Vigoss region (Alto Alentejo), Portugal; Delgado (+968) 57-8, pl. U2 Deer 15 Tourmus, Musée Grewae, Coll, Pico(-Hannczo) 237, fiom tombs at ‘Camp Sabathice’, Tunisia® (Usted in Catalogue de Muse de Fours, Spplénet 1) vorM 45 Additonal references 1G, Ponticoli, Catalogo della Sezione Acheologca del Museo Giveo “Ala Ponzone’ di Cremona (Milano, 1974) 206, v0. 311, pl. OLVL, with further bibl, cited. (Ibid. v0.312, pl. CLVIL, from the same site is related, bist more fragmentary.) 5 Hayes (1976) 22, no. 97, fig. 6 New specimens, Fores 458 17, Valdoca, Aljusteel, Portugs XXIX. Do 254. 11 Raqgada, no context; Salomonson (1968) 117-1B, figs. 27.1, 30.2 (under type G7); Salomonson (1970/73) 55, pl. VII fig. $7. Dee. 20°. I, grave 4oa; Alareio (1966) 87 (no. 402.2), pl New specimens, Fortn 458. tg, Raggada, tomb A 5; Salomonson (1968) 116-17, fig. a9.1 (under type © 3)3 Mahjoubi (1970/73) +2, pl. IV top (poor drawing); Salomonson (1970/73) 54, labl. LD. 31-9. Single grooves on rim and Noor 20, Tournus, Musée Greuze, Coll. Picot 2g2, rom Camp Saber, Tunisia (vee Form 44.15 above). D. about 22 [not measured]. New specimens, Foren 456 ar Raggada, no context; Salomonson (1968) 117, fig. ag. (ander type C4) Salomonson (1970/73) 54-5, pl. VII fig. 34. De a2'5. ‘Single grooves on floor and on lip. 22 Raggads, tomb 8; Mahjoubi (1970/73) 12, pl 8, pl VI top; noted by Salomonson (1960) 117, and (1970/73) 34. D264. "Poor drawing. Single {grooves on vim and floor. Listed under iype © 4" For a fragment ofthis form with animal-head handle, see under Form 148 Not preity lated. Hannezo dug in many in BAG Teer gata (nde 1855-195 (199) places in Tunisia; orbs ein seater lated 2-4 AFRIGAN RED SLIP WARE 495 rors 48 Adlitonal reece 12 Salomonson (1970/73) 56-7. ‘New specimens, Form 480 14 Raggada, no context; Salomonson (1968) 118-19, fig. 29.35 Salomonson (1970/73) 56-7, pl VIL fig. 38 (under ype C8). Dee. gig. Grooves round centre and on outer part oflleor. (Cited: LRP 6) Variant with decoration: 15 Six Muscum (gallery VI), fom Thina(2). D. about go [not measure Incomplete; centre ising’ Lip as Form Go, "Ware at Form 36 or Form G2 Doers wh hee medi eso oer pao home(2) Fear with pa lyr [one tigre ising) Mae ath century? Foun 49) New specimen 9 (Cited: LAP 67.) Raggqada, tomb B 11 bis; Salomonson (1968) 116, fig. 28.25 ahjoubi (1970/73) 16, pl. XIX centre Salomonson (1970/73) 53-4 (ander type Ca). Context: found with a flagon of Form 172; about mid gra ccontury. [Naw specimens, Form. 50.4, 62-63 Raqquda, tombs A.4, A135 Salomonson (1968) 114-16, fig. 28.1 (under type C1}; Majoubi (1970/73) 11) 13, pl 1-12, pl. IHL, X; Salomonson (2970173) 52-3: tabl. 1. D. 220, 202. (For the variant from Raqgada tomb B26, ee under Form 31.) 64 Valdoca, Aljusirel, Portugal, gr XVII. D. 36. 65. Elvas region (Alto Alentejo), Portugal; Delgado (1968) 58, pl. Ig, D. fe 244; Alareio (1906) 65, 1. 244-5 Ph New specimens, Types A/B, B 66 Vila Vigosa region (Alto Alentejo), Portugal; Delgado (1968) 59, pl. TIT 4. D.e.39._ Rather thick-walled. | 467 Leiden, from Sousse oF Six region; Holwerda (1936) no. 702. D. 18-3. Rim blackened on outside. ‘Type Bs ware normal Additonal reference 1 Bourgeois (1969) 45, pl. VITT496 SUPPLEMENT TO LATE ROMAN POTTERY: Ailitonal referees, Foren 528 44 Bourgeois (1969) 47, pl. VIE & (profile 5 Noted: ibid. 47. 9) Bid. 46 (noted); Pallarés (1072) fig. 5 top on p. 50 (alter Lambogtia, 196). 11 Bourgeois (1969) 45, pl. VII 2 (profile), VIII 2 (photograph) 12 Noted: ibid 45 13 Noted: ibid 45 1 Noted? ibid. 30-7, 44-5. 15 Noted: ibid. 46, 18 Siracusa 40584. Cited by Vora Pipitone (1971) 460-7. 20, Noted: Bourgeois (1969) 45. |, pl. X 1 (photograph). Nao specimens (alt small-sized) 25 [This and 24-26 cited, LRP 77. Raqqada, no context; Salomonson (1968) 120, fig. 30.3, pl IV 2 (under type C11); Salomonson (2970/73) 989 1 fig. 45. Decatt-g. Fou fsh on sim. Lip grooved 24-26 Riqaeda, context uncertain Salomonson (1960) 120, ph IV 4, 9¢4 Note: Salomonson (1968, +20, ad 1970/73, 58) inieates tha two Reggada finds ot this form (hich ones?) were found with datable lamp (econ all ofr century) 27 Sfax Museum (gallery V1), from Thina(2). D, about 11 [aot measured]. Double nt with id wo once rs fone ge mtg 28 (Details of 28-30 trom Vora Pipitone) Siracusa, from Noto; Vora Mitone (1g72) 466 (ot figured). D. x62, Fy Acelos hes, 29, Siracusa 34645 tid 466, fig. 3. “D. 19:9. Low rfl, seasmonster Siracusn 36775 from Sees bid 67, fg4.-‘Thnee panthers basket with brinches of rapes For §2? 72? (this wate?) 31 (B. Druyére, Fouiles de Clyima-Qolcam (Sie, 1930-1992 (Cairo, Tost Frangais, 1966) fig. 8 on p. 109, top r. (not described). D. 16._ Six sets of five knots (38 on Foren 72) on 2 Mat vim. Kdenifeaton not eonfemed) FORM 53 Additional references, Form 53 1 Madrid, Museo arq. nac. 347365 Palol (1967) 365-6, pl. CXIV (wrongly listed as from Tamuda); Bourgeois (1969) 33-4, pls 13 (profile), TH (photo. raph); H. Confort in Enciclopedia del arte antic, Suplemento 1970 (1943) fi Ba on p20 — Tora Sit (eprin) fig. 27 on p34. De 19% Th 49 jourgeois). 2 Madrid 94737. Palol (1967) 366, pl. CXV (listed as from Tamuda); Bourgeois (1969) 34-5, pls 1, IV, V1, and p. 4g (context). -D. ig AFRICAN RED SLIP WARE 497 1H. 573 [Bourgeois]. From a grave with five coins, Volusian (251-1) 10 tus Gothicus and Quintitfanas (270). Joan and Ponsich (1967) 514-15, pl Ty eted by Bourgeois (1963) 399,46 ‘Gited iid. 38-40. Bess Ne) id 43-4 pl fer Merlin Peet momen urs aif mes de Mitra (uae, 1Hg6) i248, no. 89, fig. Go; Davemberg)Saglio, Didionave des anaes vecques ed ramanes ita (Pasi, 1918) 1953, fig. 50945 Bourgeois (1980) 41-2, PL VI (ater the preceding). Naw speciners, Fore 554 22 Catania, Castello Ursino (Coll Msc) G. Liev Mase Bia (Milano) Roma, 190) 200-1, no 86o, pl. XCVIT; Bourgeois (1950) 40; Salomonson, Pialech Ste (aga) 92-9, 79> ae p. 405 0.473 Abo i (1971) fig. 8 on pibs,withnotesp.iga, Desdhtle5,, Thicegioves on inside ofrim, neon He” Appius» in wih ari cng ces men plane Samonon {ti, 52-3) sents the strcture 8 potery kl, rjetng on Famogeaptiel eed Libertin's ideaiendon #6 the Bia! scene of the iconographical grounds Libert "Thre Israelites in the Fiery Furnace. 23 Paestum, Museo Nazionale (no number cited); Voza Vipitone (1971) 470, noisy fg. 12. D. aht5, H. 2, Group of three boars running 1 below, boar t, palm-branch, vor 54 Additional references 1 Bourgeois (1969) 465 Pallavés (1972) fh Lambogtia (1963)) 2 Bourgeois (1960) 475 pl IX 4 (profile), pl. X 2 (photograph) 5 botiom on p. 59 (drawing; ef FORM 55 Additonal reference 8 Ronrgrois (1969) 38-40, pl. VIX (drawing, after Maree) vorM 56 Additional references ‘To 1, Benaki 12410: Salomonson (1973) +2, fig 6 4 Ibid. 12, fig 5 5 Baratte (1971) 182, with n. 7 8 pl XXII, lomonson (1973) 11, fig. 2. GOP peat Remini, Vetere Christanram (Baxi xi (1978) 360, Mid, 24, fg. 185 L. Pa Siject a «sy by J. We Salomonson: ‘Konsgeehihishe nd tone pie Se erecta nam Toniagnet der Sammi Bera498 SUPPLEMENT TO LATE ROMAN POTTERY Athen’, BABesch xlviii (1973) 3-2. See especially p. 5 Mf, figs. 1, 155 recor struction propased p. 42M with fig. 2. 12 Loverdos (1969) 933-4 pl. o8:a; Rodziewiex (1970) 256, fig. 4 om p. 255 (ketch after Allis). 13, Pallarés (1972) 51, fig. 8 on p. 53. 14 Cited: Loverdas (1969) 2g0 0. 6,245 16 Rodviewiex (1970) 256-7, fig. 5 (aller Allas), Following 16: Tenaki 12g12—Loverdos (1969) 23-2, 954, 0.2, ph 963. Dena 12415—ihid. 232, 254, NO. 4, pl 7 Benaki 12417—tbid, 232-3, 234, no. 5, plg7 b. Benaki 12426—ihid, 231, 294, no. 1, pl 6b ‘Add to these: Benaki 12411, 93,254, no. 3, pl. 103 b 7 Musée du Bardo T 1131. M. Yacoub, Le Muce dx Bardo (Tunis, 1970) 53, fig. 573 MoO. Jentel, Ree dart conaicme|Canadian drt Review iv (0977) 30-7 8 3 18 Guéry (1972) 119, fig. 15 (detail of rim). ; 21 Salomonson (1973) 73-H fig. 583 Rodaicwie (1976) pl. V1-2. 22 Rodziewiez (1970) fig. 3 on p. 254 (after Wace). 23, Loverdos (1969) 237-9, no. 6, ps. 99 a, 100. Toten 1245: 0-109 pl ob; Slomenso 173) 1910 centte). 54 Loverdot (go) 29, 7p 9 Salmons (1973) 4 fg. t0 (= tp ‘To Benaki 1243 Loverdos (1969) 299-40, no 0, pl. 01 a; Salomonson (1973) 19, fig. 103. ‘Vo 23-24: Loverdos adds Benaki 12409 (Loverdos (1969) 241-2, no. 10, pl 103 a) For reconstructions of the pattern of 23-24, see Loverdos (1969) 242, pl. 102 a, and Salomonson (1973) 19, fig. 11. For a motif related to the tondo of Form 89.1 on Form 56, sce Benaki 12427 Salomonson (1969) 12, 99, fig. 44 = (1973) 14-12, fig. 8. ‘Carthage version: see ERP 85, under tim-motit xf; ao Guéry (1972) 119-21, figs. 16-21. Jonah scenes, Deaded borders, Rather rougher ware and narrower rim than the classic Form 56. Additional references: vim-matifs (see LRP 88-9) Further examples: six fis. in University College, London, from Egypt (various ‘motif. (Wace (1948) pl. Lis reproduced by Pallarés (1972) fig. 7 on p. 52, with ref. p51. See also Rodziewiez (1970) figs. 6-7 on p. 258 (after Wace, Allais). Add: A. Hundt and K. Peters, et al., Greifwalder Antiken (Berlin, 1961) 101-2, no. 451, Pl. 55: For the Benaki Museum examples (nos. 2388-97) sce further Loverdos (1969) APRICAN RED SLIP WARE, 499 235 n. 18, 234, pl g®b. Further examples: Toronto g10.175.284 and 288 (Hayes (1976) 23, nos. 99-100, pl. 12); Warsaw, Nat. Mus. 139878, from Eada (Redziewice (r970) fig. 1 on p. 253, and passim). (viii) Further example (rim fr.): Dublin, National Museum of Ireland 1904:577- Achilles and Chiron, row of dotand-circle motifs along inner ed (xi) Benaki Mus. 12407: see also Loverdos (1969) 242, no: 11, pl. 102 b (this motif? (sii) For the Torrox fr, see also Palol (1967) 3 3, ple CX. [New specimen (section a venatio scenes) 25 Leningrad, Hermitage Muscum X 939, from Chersonesus; A. V. Banck, Byzantine Artin the Collections ofthe USSIE (Leningrad and Moscow, 1966) fig. 23, pp. 280-1, with bibl. (in Russian), and p. 936 (English text). L. of floor L extant) ¢ 325. Horse and man to L, facing bear and goat(2); below, various figures (tree? ostrich? ctc,). A detached fr. with a recumbent figure fon a couch—same vessel? Dotand-circle ornaments along inner edge of roRM 57 Additonal references 3,6. T. Zammit, Ant. J. viii (1920) 480, pl. LXXY Og. 3, top rs and L New specimen 7 Ragqada, no context; Salomonson (1970/73) pl. VILL fig. 36, type Ge (no text). D.e.2475. Two(?) grooves on Fim, one on floor. row 58 Additional references 16 W.Necdler, Palestine Ancient and Modem (ROMA, Toronto, 1949) 395 Pl VIII a, bottom centre; Hayes (1976) 22-3, no. 98, fig. 6. New specimens ‘tog Manchester Muscum R ott, ftom Thapsus or Cap Bon region. D. 25°7. ‘One groove on rim, two)thrce grooves on floor. Darkish slip, patchy on bottom, with slight gras-marks; posibly S. Tunisian. Barly? 30 Manchester Museum R917, from Cap Bon region. D. 25°6. aie of faint rooves on rim, two grooves on floor, scratch round bottom close to inset. ‘Thin worn slip on inside and on wall(?) Form 32/58(?): 31 Manchester Museum R r2, from Thapsus or Cap Bon region. D. e. 278. Variant type, with pair of fine grooves on rim. Thin slip down to edge of base. 32 Valdoca, Aljustrel, Portugal, grave 439; Alareio (1966) 86 (no. 439.2), pl. XXXILD. 27-0 Worn; surface lost, no decoration visible. This ware?500 SUPPLEMENT TO LATE ROMAN POTTERY set sg 5, ORM 59) Additional references 1 Listed: Antigutis of Libya (exhibition, British Museum, 1973) no. 153. 2H. Comfort, in Bncic. delarteantca, Supplemente 1970 (1973) fg. 823 on p. 821 Terra Sigillta (reprint) fig. 22 on p. 29. 8 Original drawing reproduced: Jodin and Ponsich (1967) 525, fig. 3 a. New specinens, Form 39 a1 Tamuda; Jodin and Ponsich (1967) 513, ple IIT (citing catlier bibl... 2975. Slight groove on bottom close to olfiet. Decoration: rosette (Type 444), owo pairs of grooves enclosing row of nine similar rosettes, Style Ai. 22 Tamuda; iid. 513, plLTV. D.27-5, Five radiating palms round a rosette(?) at centre, triple groove, 17 rosettes (Type 444), pair of grooves, Style A if (transitional?) 23 Frontignan (Hérault), Chemin des Romains, tomb 25 L, Albagnac and M. C. Valaison, Reowe archologique de Narbonnaice i (1969) 145-6, 154) fig. 1 right, pl. 3.1. 'D. 40. Rim moulded, as 1(2). Decoration: six small radiating palms (Type 3, early), triple groove(?), row of rosettes (Type 444), pair of grooves, Style Ai. Found together with 18 coins of ab, 390/5—-341/6. AFRICAN RED SLIP WARE, sor New specimens, Form 592 24 Siracusa 43800, from Palazzolo Acreide; Voza Pipitone (1974) 467, fig. 5. (Size not indicated.) Radiating palms, concentvic circles and small triangular Uriple-cirele motifs (ef. Types 81-83); exact details not clear on the published photograph. 25 Reading, University Collection (on loan fiom Dr. J. 1. Young). D, 266, Gentral rim-moulding convex. Pair of grooves on bottom close to hase-inset, Decoration: six elose-et radiating palms (Lype 4, Style Aji), triple groove. ‘Thick dull slip. Provenance unknown (called “Romano-British’ on old label!) 26 Manchester Museum R916, ftom Cap Bon region, D. ag7, Rim as 19, Triple groove on floor, no stamps. 27 Sperlonga, Mus. Arch. Stamps: radial palms (Type 4), with roseties (Lype 30/44 variant) at thei tips; two separated grooves, row of cite stamps (Type 127, mall), two separated grooves. Dull sip. Tron rivet from ancient repair. New specimens, ype and ware uneriain 28-0 Babria Oasis, Temple of Alexander the Great near el-Kasr A, Fakhry, ‘The Egyptian’ Deserts: Bahri Oasis ii (Cairo, 1950) 47, pl. XXXII B-C, XXXIV B. Details not available, 28 appavently Type A, with stamps of Style A ii(?). 29: radiating palms and eitcles, Style A i, rors 61 Additonal references 1 Listed: Antguitis of Libya (British Muscum, 1973) no. 158, 15 Baradez’s drawing reproduced in Baradcz (1g66) pl. II'r (on p. 275). New specimen, Form 618 37, Manchester Museum R gt, fom Thapsus or Cap Bon region, D. 30-0)20+2 (top edge). Rim as 21. Triple groove on floor, no stamps New specimen, Form 643 38 Sperlonga, Mus. Arch. Smallish floor, long wall, project (el, 34-39), ‘Two pairs of grooves on floor, flanking a row of erescent stamps (Type 75). Groove on bottom. Dark malt sip. vorM 62 The sizes: D.¢, 20-23--unstamped or with simple decoration, D. 6. 25-30 (and up to e. 34). large examples (as noted in LRP), D. 6: 45-55 Netw specimens, Form 62. (Note: the dimensions given below are approximate—not m sasured.) 16-17, Sfax Muscum, from La Skhira (Ag, B4). D, about 20-22, Radiating Balms; rouletted band on outer part of floorso 1-95 26-27 tag 30 SUPPLEMENT TO LATE ROMAN POTTERY Sfax Museum, from La Skhira (A.6, 13, 14; B4, 17, 29; G1, and one labelled). D. about 24-28. Radiating palms {various types) alternating with other moti, double rouletted band or variant on outer part of floor Some stamps are rather lange and erude ‘Slax Museum, from La Skhira (A, sccond specimen; B26). D. ¢. 23, €.20. Concentric circle stamps between grooves round centre, no rouletted, band. Slax Muscum, from La Skhira (B20 and unlabelled). D, 25-+, 204 Concentric circle stamps round centre, rouletted band(s) and grooves on ‘outer part of floor. Sfax Muscum, from La Skhira (C2). D. 25-1. Seven rosettes (Type 44) round centre, faint double rouletied band on outer part of floor, rons 63 Additional reference 1 Tolmeita, Dept. of Antiquities ofice, no. 7426.1 vos 64 Form 50B/64, naw specimen 6 Matera, Museo D. Ridoli 13365, from “ha ntoniera dé Ponte $. Gi (Goma tilegrave, found 1910). D.20'5, Dol hase inset 64, H.3-9. Groove, four stamps (unclasified type; see Fig: 6 3), groove at edge of floor, Ware rather rough, Note: no context-material, but a second tilesgrave neathy contained a glass beaker with blue prunts of a como id 4th early 5th century type (A 133675 Isings type 106 c), ooklyn Mus. 16.541 (oh Type 19) Seales 98 FORM 65 Naw specimens 5 Gonimbriga; Alareao (1963-4) 85, pl. 113, pl. IV.2g (stamp). Est. D.c. 20 Rim hooked. Centre missing, rosette stamps (as Type 444 within a circle), fone groove. This ware? Date uncertain, 5-36 Babria Oasis, Temple of Ale AFRICAN RED SLIP WARE Ey ror 67 Aalditiona reference 6 R.J. Charleston, in (ed, Charleston) World Ceramics (London and New York, 1968) fig. 87 0” p. 37- Nate specimens 30 Conimbriga; Alareto (1963-4) 5, pl. I. D.e. 41. Hooked rim (ef 6), base-reatment uncertain, Decoration: six radiating palms (Type. 4), uriple(®) groove, 16 notes (Type 44, tiple groove}. Style Afi, & 350? 31 Cerro da Vila villa, Quartcira (Algarve), Portugal; M. 1. E. da Veiga ‘Alfonso dos Santos, “rjuelogia Romana de digaree i (Associacio dos Arqued- fogos Poriugueses, Lisbon, 1971) 144, fig. 55 0” p. 147, citing Afonso do Pacoand J. Farrajota (‘Subsidins para uma Caria Arqueoligiea do Coneelho de Loulé) Anquclogia e Histiri® xii (Lisbon, 1966) 721 D. 42, He 7. Stamps: circles oF stamp at centre, ten radial palms with circle motifs at tips and grilles between (Types uncertain—poor drawing); multiple grooves. 2 Manchester Muscurn R 915, from Cap Bon region. D. 31-3. ‘Thick rime roll slightly hooked; no groove on top. Decoration: four stamps composed of an eight-petalled rosecte (as Type 44) within a ring of shore strokes {unclassified see Fig. 96 b); two grooves. Conese Fabre, thick bright sip Probably faiely late in series, 433. Manchester Museum R914, from Thapsus or Cap Bon region. D. 33-2. Rather shallow. No thickening at rim. Two tiple grooves om floor, no stamps. . 34. Sperlonga, Mus. Arch, Small (D. ¢. 23—not measured), Shallow, with base of small diameters exter groove on bottom close (0 ‘foot’. Round centee, two grooves, five squce stamps (th radial internal strokes), to grooves. ider the Great near el-Kasr; A. Fakliry, ‘The Egplian Deserts: Babria Oasis (Cairo, 1959) 47, pl. XXXII A, XXXIV B. Details not available; presumably this wate. 332 unusual srrangement of radiating palms et obliquely and irregularly placed circles. rors 67/71 For general description, see above, p. 415 Type-specimen 1 Vila Vigosa region (Alto Alentejo), Portugal; Delgado (1968) 57,61, pl IIT D.t5. Fors 70 Naw specimens to-rt Sf Muscum, from La Skhira (B19; unlabelled), x0 as x; a rather "small (D. e112).504 SUPPLEMENT TO LATE ROMAN POTTERY ror 75 Naw specimen, Form 734. 11 Represis, Beja, Portugal; Delgado (1908) 64, pl. HI6, D. e153. Notches con lip, groove on top of rim, vor 76m ‘Type-specimen 8 Conimbriga; Alareio (1963-4) 85-6, pl 15, Bat. D.c. 52, Fragmentary, Poot grooved on bottom; double rouletied band and continuous beading on im. “Decoration on floor: three grooves at centre, radiating palms (Type 4) with circles (Type 28) between their tips, quadruple groove combined with double rouletied band, Style b? Fors 81 New specimens, Form 81.4 19 Ragusa Muscum (Sicily) 8g, fo fig. 1. Size not stated. 10 Manchester Museum R 896, fiom Thapsus. D. 17-0. Ware elose (© Form 1B: exterior smooth, light pinkish-red; slip thiek and polished on interior, thinner (partial) on exterior, 11 Manchester Museum R 898, from Cap Bon region, D, 15:4. Similar, with comer rouleting, Gozzo Cicivellos Vora Pipitone (1971) 465, FOR 86 (or 84, late) Naw specimen 8 Alexandria, Musée Gréco-Romain gi; Rodewiez (1976) 75 pl 6, HL Fors 87 Additional references 5 Mayes (1973) 113, no. 2492, fig. 4oe Tocra 64/187 (see LRP 196) = ibid 119, no. 2506, fi. 5. ‘New specimen, cerian ype 6 Albenga, nea Iola Gallinaria (fom sea); N. Lamboglia, in Ani del If Congreso Internazionale di Avletogin Settomarina (Bordighera, i961) 141, no. 21, with fig. D. 48. Low angular foot, as on Form 88; no decoration shown. Cl also Form 77. FORM Bg Additional references, Fort 8A 1 Pallarés (1972) 51, fig. 9; Salomonson (1973) 11-12, fig. § (detail of tondo). 2 Pallarés (1972) 58 fi. 10, with further Dbl pe gyn 1a, ’ AFRICAN RED SLIP WARE. 505 voRM 90 Additonal reference, Form 9B. 14. Hayes, in Apollonia, the Port of Gyrene (1976) 262, n0. 9, fig. 2 ors g/go wases (we ERP 140) Ailton referee a Hayes (1973) 115, m0. 24955 fig. 49 rors 91 Ailionlrfcnes Hayes (1977) fig. 2-1-1 on p. 24. 21 Hayes inl, te Pat of Gene 263,00. 1, 23, Hayes (1077) fig. 21.1.2 0n p. 284, EE Hayes inline Port of Gren 2, no. 20 fs 3 20, Hayes (1973) 110, no. 2405, fig 48- 3 specimens Type R: 10 Moosberg (Murna, S. Bavaria) J 8° Manche, 9) Tots ie aus Haye (r977) a, Hi Gan" Bean eligi Hang caiant of Type B. ‘Two groves on outside gu Toledo Mustum of Art (Ohin) 06.212, Kom Egypt; Calaligue of Feption “pis (Felodo, wo) 5. ne- a2 (eeprin sary. p 295 KeT, Kaen, Te vngy See pars > Msmen News (Ealeds, Fa 07 9, dg. 20 08 pate Daagfayns Ultra, As 3-6, Grow on oti ce oft. sarbuch, Der Monsberg bei Murnaw Logon p. 284 (after smentary. Barly(2) oars i], XXXIV 28. Th Fie Shean (Paleie); Fieger akShn it pl XXXIV a8, “This 3 ppeats to be a restored drawing of the simto-base fragment Philadelphia, floor-olfiet and a groove under base. (Fitzgerald's drawings are not always tecuate) arming, Ciy Mu Diysies ma samme and Arc ery c489"B5-93, from S: Variant type: ; 34 Albenga, near Tsola Gallinaria (from sea); Lamboglia, in Atti IT Congr. Int. ‘Arch. Sotomarina (Bordighera, 1961) 141-2, no. 22, with fig. D, ¢. 20-2/22-2 ‘Type A? C2 Two grooves on inside; no rouletting indicated. Variant with fion-head spout: to the examples eited in Hayes (1977). add Phila Adelphia, University Museum (aneatalogued fi. in Clasical collections)506 SUPPLEMENT TO LATE ROMAN POTTERY rorM 92 New specimen 5 Manchester Museum R gro, from Cap Bon region, D. 205/224 max. Slight base-mouldiug. Flange plain, Ware elose to Forms 73, 91B. roRM 93 Additional references 1 (Fig. 9f]-. For the complete form, ef. now Martin (1977) 97-9, forme NV.L, fig. 3.1. ‘The type is now dated too early or it to be considered asa forerunner ‘of Form 93 proper. 12 (= Michigan 200245 Fig. 51 b). ‘The Gods of Faypt (exhibition, Aun Athor, Michigan, 1977) no. 98. New specimen, Form 938 variant 25 Sporlonga, Mus. Arch.; Tacopi, Lanto di Tiberio « Sperlonga (Rome, 1963) 60, fig. 160. 1D. about 24 [not measured]. Knobbed rim, low ledgeclike foot with small offset and pair of seratch-like grooves on floot immediately bove. At centre, stamped cross with six lamb-roundels (cf. Type $29), within two grooves, Normal slip, smooth, Fora small counterpart, sce Textabove, p. 486. Ct. Fig. 95 (= LRP, Fig. 56s) Additional reference " 8 Hayes, in Apllnia, the Prt of Cyrene fg 0 #7, fig. 2 vox 97, New specimen 12 Antena region, Healy; L. Quilici, Not. se. 1968, 745 n. 1, figs. 62, 63 top. Est. D. 6 20:5, Fragment; centre missing, Restored as ninessided (uncertain) ‘Two grooves along inner edge of rim. FORM 90 Additional reference 15 Caballero Zoreda (1974) 207-8, fig. 9.1 (after Lamboglia). New specimens, Form 9gA-B 29 Alexandria, Musée Gréco-Romain 9592; Rodziewicz (1976) pl. 6, B a5, and pl. IT figs. g-5. D. . 17:2. Stamped motif (type uncertain). 30 Ceuta; C. Posac Mon, Boletn del Seminario de Estudios de Arte y Arguologta (Valladolid) xox (1964) 326, figs. 2. and 3. 31 Tas-Silg, Malta; Missine archeologica italiana a Malta: Rapporto preliminare della campagra 1967 (Rome, 1968) 36, fig. 4.25, pl. 16:53 Caballero Zoreda (1974) 208, fig. 9-2 (drawing after the preceding). D. 19(2).. Stamp: dove to xl AFRIC. Naw specimen, Form 99 32 Nocera Umbra, tomb 2g (item n); A. Pasqui, Mon. ant. xxv (1918) 2153 Baldassarre (1967) 143, no. 3, and p. 173 (with ref. to other bowls possibly ). D185, N RED SLIP WARE sor Additional references 2-3 Hayes (1973) 119, nos. 2511-13, fig. 50. Aaditonal reference 2 Bid 110, wo. 2477, fi is 49. Additional references 1 Did. 113, no. 2513, fg 50. 12 Hayes, in Apollonia, the Port of Cyrene 263, no. 21, fig. 3. For Form ra/t0a, sce discussion, p. 486. vorM 103 Additional reference 9, J. Bngemann, Jalebuch fir Ante und Cloistentum xv (1972) 165, n. 86, pl 1g (iloor decoration), Form tog Aaditonal refrenes 1 Engemann, op. eit. 166, with farther bibl, cited 9, 86, pl 1ga. Note: buent in places after broken, Normal groove on outside below rim (wot indicated ‘on published drawing). 2 Ibid. 157, pl. 13 ¢ (after LRP Pl. XVIILD). 5, Barader (166) pls. V, IX r (on pp. 278, 282). 6-7 Ibid. pl 1X2, 4. 12 Ibid. pls. Vi, VILL, no. 24 (on pp. 279, 281). 1 The God: of Egypt (exhibition, Ann Arbor, 1977) no. 104. 2b Philadelphia, University Museum 2g-102-540. D. 27%, 29 Hayes, in Apollonia, the Port af Cyrene 262, no, 1, fig. 2 [New specimens Type A: 0 Sperlonga, Mus. Arch.; G. Tacopi, L'aniro di Tiberio a Spertonga (Rome, 1963) 160, fig. 169. Early variant, small-sized (D. about 25). "Near-complete; paris burnt after broken. ‘Thick knobbed rim, normal foot. Normal slip on inside and rim, Seratch-like grooves: pair close to rim, two on floor flanking a row of five stamps, Type 115. No external groove. Early-—c. 500 oF rather earlier, on stylistic analogies. (Note: this supersedes the entry in ERP 249.)508 SUPPLEMENT TO LATE ROMAN POTTERY 30 Si rave’ Zion 65(2)-2501; Prausnits (2967) 42, fig. 12.4, pl XXL bed, Eat. D, fax.) € 40. Fragmentary. Rather kobbed rim (Type A/B2). Decora. tion: standing ‘Emperor’ figave (Type 2go, variant), with a bust preserved on and tail ofa bird la ingle groove. Type ©: 32 Shavei Zion 63-2502; ibid. fig. 12.2, pl XXd. D. e Decoration: two standing figures (apparently Type 242: man), three grooves. Groove halfway dawn outside. 33 Shavei Zion 63-2503; ibid. 42, fig, 124, pl. XXVa. D. ¢. 32, Decoration: standing ‘Emperor’ figure (Type 230), thrve grooves. 34 Shavei Zion 63-2510; ibid. fig. 13.6, pl XXe. D. e 30, Central stamp (obliterated), tivo grooves, 32-34 come from the same Loews, together with many other restorable pots of the period c. a.v. 575-6253 perhaps a single destruction deposit (see ibid. 39-40 for comments). Persian invasion period? Rather earlier? Associated coins {any were found) are not mentioned in the published report Fragmentary. ‘Christ and blind Probably Form 104—but could be 403 (Form wot indicated) 35 Leningrad, Hermitage X 385, from Chersonesus; A. V. Back, Byzantine Art in the Collections of the USSR (Leningrad and Moscow, 1966) 21 (Russian text, with bibl, cited), 336 (English text), fig. 24;.J. Engemann, Jalzbueh fir Anite tnd Ghrstetum xv (1972) 166, u.86, pl 19 ¢;. Belyacv, Soobshchenia Ermilacha xxxvii (1973) 47-50. D. 385, H. 574 (Helyacy gives gyro and 5-7), Decora tion: standing ‘stint’ with cross ('ype 234, variant with different eross), surrounded by three doves; triple groove. (Published photographs show decorated area only.) Additional references 2 Hayes (1973) 110, no. 2478, fig. 49. 9) Hayes, in Apolinia, the Port of Cyrene 262, wo. 3, fig. 2. 10 Hayes, lc cit nos 12 Castel Trosino, tomb go no. go. Baldasarse (1967) 159, no. 41 (D. cited as 28) 14 F. Van Doorninck, in (ed. G. F. Bass) History of Seafaring (London and New York, 1972) pl 20 0n p. 155 New specimens 20 Shavei Zion 63-2505; Prausnite (1967) 42, Chamier on floor. at Nocera Umbra, tomb 60 (item a); Pasqui, Mon, ant. xxv (1918) 2545 Baldas- sarre (1967) 146, no. 10, and p.173. D. 34 22 Castel Trosino, tomb F (no. 4); Mengareli, Mon. ant. xi (1902) 1975 Baldas- saree (0967) 155, m0. af, with rel to ther des possibly similar, po 175 32. if 1344, pL_XXb. De 3g. slit AFRICAN RED SLIP WARE, 509 FoRN 106. Abditonal refnence 1 Hayes, in Apollonia, the Por of Gyrene 262, no. 5, fig. 2. Fors 107 Additional refernces 1 Hayes (1973) 110, no. 2469, fig. 49. 2 Tolmeita, Dept. of Antiquities ofice, no. 71191 4 Hayes, in Apollonia, the Port af Cyrene 263, 00. 11, fig 2 New specimens 5 Shavei Zion 63-2575 Prausnitz (1967) 42, fig. 13.3, pl XXUITK. De. 29. ‘Two + one grooves on floor. 6 Shavei Zion 63-25063 ibid. fig. 13.2 (and pl XXILd?). Est. D. c. 29, Fragment, rim to base. ‘Two grooves on floor. §-6 come from the same ccontext as Form 105,20 above. Part of same destruction deposit as Form ro4ge-31? rons 108 Additional reference 1 Hayes (1973) 120, wo. 2470, Bg. 49. Fors 109 Additonal references 1-2 Ibid. 110, nos. 2471, 2472, fig. 49. Additonal references 5, Hayes (1976) 22, no. 95, pl. 13 20 Carandini, Avceologia Classica xxi (1969) 286, pl. CIV 1-25 Salomonson, Rin, Mose, Allier and Tigris (Archaeologica Traietina xi; Groningen, 1976) 13, 6Bn. 69, pl. XID. New specimens 27 Limoges, Musée A. Dubouché 77-95, ex Campana Collections OVA Limages— Vannes (France, fase.24) pl, 41.12." H. 2, L. extant ¢. 196, Pront spout missing. 28 Belém (Portugal), Museu Nacional de Arqueologia, from Monte Molio, Lagos (Algarve); A. da Costa Fereciea, O Areheolaga Portiguis xix (1914) 4, n 1, fig. 3; MLE. da Veiga Affonso dos Santos, Arquedlogia’ Romana do Algarce i (Associagao dos Arquedlogos Portugueses, Lisbon, 1971) 355, fi. 147 fon p. 369. Size not indicated, a9 Belém, Mus. Nac. Arq. 14976(2) (formerly in Museu do Algarve), from Torre de Ares, Tavira (Algarve); A.A. Mendes Cortcia, in (ed. D. Peres) Histvia de50 SUPPLEMENT TO LAT Portugal (Bareclos, 1928) Og. on p. 1795 fon pe aG7."L. 14, Hg) 30 Nottingham, University Collection (previously in Lincoln Museum), formerly Melville Coll. HL to spout 7-9, Le 154. & ROMAN POTTERY Mons dos Santos, op. et. 2g, fig. 88 ron 135 New specimen 6 Manchester Muscum R gor, from near Cap Bon, H. 75, 3m D. 7-6, Three double linesofrouletting, three grooveson handle. Normaland century wate, vous 137 New specimen, Form 137/139) 8 Raggada, no context; Salomonson (tgfil) 105, fig. 20.2, pl. HIT (under type A'14);Salomonson (1970/73) 43, pl I fig. 16. Hee 11-1. Outcurved rim; slender body, bearing broad zone of rouletsing (as on Form 139), Cited: LRP 182, under Form 139 FoRM 140 New specimen 5, Nancy, Musée Lorrain G 1-3.60, ‘from Reims’. Variant type: five single lines of rouletting on body, three grooves on handle, von 146 ‘Toynbee (1957) pl. LV (.1) is reproduced by Pallarés (1972) fig. 2 (1) on p. 47. ForM 148 For a handle similar in shape to that on 1, on a bowl rim of Form 45 (or similar), see Salomonson (1971) fig. 16 0n p. 190, with notes p. 192 (in Allard Pierson Museum, Amsterdam). Band of rouletting on the sim, See p. 487 above, voRM 153 Additional referce 1 Cited by Carandini (1977) 23. vor 158 New specimens Ragqada, no context; Salomonson (1968) 104-5, fig. 20.1 (under type A 13); Salomonson (1970/73) 42, pl. ILfig. 15. Hee. 10-5, Two lines of rouletting on body, three graoves on handle, liv AFRICAN RED SLIP WARE st Large version: 12 Birmingham, ity Museums and Arc Gallery 148'85-g0, from Sardinia. H 23-0, Base-moulding with low foot, strap-ike handle with six grooves. ‘Tine sets of (groove and} 2-3 ines of rouletting ont body. Cf. 7 rors 160 Additonal refrences 3. This vesecl, or another from same source: Salomonon (1968) 109 (under A 6), 1. 54 fig. 7b. Salomonson cites fir such vessels from el-Aouja: Cat. Alon! (i922) 304, nos. 1115-14. 17, Hayes (1976) 22, no. 94, pl. 13, Now specimen 20 Raqgada, tomb A g; Salomonson (4968) 100-1, fig. 7.1. (photograph) and fig. 16.2 (onder type A 6); Mahjoubi (1970/73) 12, pl VIL, top right; Salomo son (1970/73) 38. Est. Tee 15:6, vors 161 Aditional refenence 1 Carandini (1977) 2g, ple VIE 5-65 Pompeii, A.D. 79 (exhibition eat., American ced. 1978) 1263, with fi rons 163 Additional references For2_ Salomonson (1968) 101, fig. 8 b (== Cat, Alani (1922) 301, 0. 107), 3 Mabjoubi (1970/73) 18, ph. 28-29, pl. XXXII top right; Salomonson (1970) 73) go, tabl. To HL extane 14:3, max. D. 51. Rim missing ron 169 See Text above vor 170 Additional reference 1 Salomonson (1971) fig. 5 on p. £78, with notes p. 192. vors 171-179 Salomonson’s table of forms (1968, tab. 11) is reproduced in Salomonson (1970/73) tabl. HL, with remarks p. 48, vow 171 Additional details 45. Prof, H. S. Robinson has kindly provided detailed measurements: H. 155, D. rim 256, body 7°3, base 43si SUPPLEMENT TO LATE ROMAN POTTERY New specimen (worm type) 52 Tournus, Musée Greuze, Coll. Pleat 927, from ‘Tunisia (Rndspot unknown). ‘Top missing. Lozenge, bull to Ls diadems aboves three palms, vous 180 Additional reference 1 GLY. Gentil, iu dd det 1° Congresso Nazionale di archelogia cristina, Siracusa 1950 (Rome, 1952) 180, pl. XXEX fig. 1 vorw 185 Aditional references 2 Perhaps this vessel 6 Cited: ibid. 445, andi in Osta ii 415, pl. NOVIHL figs. 1047-8 vom 184 Additional references 1 Carandini, in Ostia ii 4x5, pl. XCVIIT fig, 1045 (on right) 7 Mid. 415, pl. NCIX figs. 4049-50. rors 194 Additional reference 2 The example from Pompeii cited by vessel andini (1079) 24 is presumably this ror 198 Additional reference 1 Hayes (1976) 12, no. 48, fig. 10. NOTE: drawings of the following vessels illustrated in LRP Bird (1977) fig. 20.2 on p. 271 e also reproduced! in Form 2.4, Form 30.22, 0:68 and 103, Form 5(.26, Form 6.1, Form 84.9, Form gA.2, Form 2gBh.24, Form 321, Form 40.8, Form 308/55, Fe gab.ig, Form 67.17, RELIE! AND STAMPED DECORATION For applied and relief decoration, see the new Form 169 above, and details listed under the individual forms. A fair number of new motifs have been recorded in recent years, but litle fresh dating-evidence for them has been added. Additional references, applied motife (om Forts 52, 53) ‘A. Hundt and K, Peters, eal, Grefiwalder Anien (Berlin, 196) 101—2, pl. 55, nos. 450, 452 APRIGAN RED SLIP WARE, ons ‘Numerous examples of stamped decoration have Deen published over the last yeats (see minLAOGRAPHY). Most of these belong to my Styles A Fil and on the Smaller number of sites widh late finds Styles Ei. Examples of the other styles are rare, particularly on Western Mediterranean sites—though, exceptionally, one scrap with Style D decoration is present at Conimbriga, in a eontext which may be 6465/8 oF elie late gth century." ‘The finds from the Port-Miou wreck? exhibit a good range of Style Ait stamps, An unusual stamp (not belonging eo one of the Iajot series) imitating the obverse of a coin of Honorius has been published by Gucry2 ‘The signed poingon from Tiddist has now been republished in detail ‘A few examples of ARS bowls, apparcatly of Form gt, crated with short ‘combed muliple-line patterns on the loor;# some of these vessels lack a slip. This treatment is faitly widespread on flanged bowls of other fabri from sites in Tunisia? Selected addenda to the Catalogue of Stamps published in LRP? 2ag-81 ace listed below (sce also Type Series above), Type 115, For the Sperlonga specimen, sce now Foran 194.go above ‘Type 171 . Baradez (1967) wo. 9 is reproduced by J. Bs Giristentum xv (1972) 159 545 ‘Type 2238 (as 11. 50 b) For the complote motif, see Palot (1907) g6r, pl. CXL, from Bare ‘Type 2248 1, 50d; republished by Hayes, in pollna, the Part of Grene 23, wo. 2, lg. ‘Type 227 . See also DACL iii 2, 326, fig. 3422 (oth ‘Type age (as mie. 5¢ h) Appllonia fre see also Hayes, op ef, 263, 0, 25, fig, 4+ Maraausenni (sie) lie: Vora Pipitone (4971) 457-8, fig. 6; F. Van Doorninek, in (od. G. FE Bass) Misty of Seafaring (London and Neve York, 1972) photo 10'0n p. 152. ‘Type 234 For the Apollonia example cited, see Hayes, op. cl. 263, 0. 24 fie 4 ‘Type 236 Further example: DACL ii, 2, 326, fg. 342 (aller Forver, Realesiton . 597g 483), ‘from Alexandria’ agen, iat Jahrb far Ante snd ype 236, 4.2). RG, Peame and J. Ali i et de IT alin (9) npn nal de drug (Goins 1990) Sa Kats erie Kis Arg Stace Poi aad eb, oe a Ft ean ‘Niuhjon i ny, ph 84. and Depot VII 08 id te sue agent de vay, Wy ee Depot VIN Gp or the be lack, Sen hn ee ag ime pt ap Time: Haya eis af Carte iit i 3. Depend VIL pt ea ah Wm Pe Guten fin by and Bo py The tester pier a ee fal wo Carthage pretou Tespe ; he Speslonga example of version A occurs at centre ofa base ofa large example of Form 104A, “ " Type a40 nnG. 51: Vora Pipitone (1971) 468, fg. 7 (alter Garruec. “Type 246 nic. 52: Hayes, in Apltona, te Prt of Gene 263, 90.24 fig. 4 Type 247 | A beter preserved example i illastrated by Voza Pipitone (1971) 46 ig. 8 Type For the Apollonia find, see Hayes, oct 263, no. 29, “Type ao4is variant Brooklyn Meum 16.1541, used ith Type ype 926 See abo A. Cherbonneau, Aaaie def so. arcs dela province Constontive (1863) 5, pl AX bottom 1. FLX. Kraus, RelEnghpie dr cvtichn dlertaner Treo fig. Type 329 Mariana fz Jodin (1071) 4, sialler lambs instead of circles on the cran-arm Vatican fi on Forin gBjgal vari deseribed above (p. 06); fe prfilesee 1, a5. Second halfot sth eentirys may be a ealy ase 496 Farther types “Two fragments of Form 104 (oF the fk) inthe Sperfonga Museum, wot strated by Tacoph, bear at their centres eroses sina to Type gab with diagonal lentid pendants with muiple outines added between the arm Cin the lowes quadvantey cn the common tate Roman C ware es stamps (moti 67 nnd tallowingy ‘The Egyptian examples of the motitnoted in LLP 396 preaumably deive fom the ‘ican type though the syle of eos begins cairn Late Roman (perhaps ss 2 result of direct copying fiom metalware ‘The stamps on a number of published vests Tsted ia LAP ate reproduced in Caballero Zoreda (1974) figs 1orrs, 17. Baradez (1961) ple LIV and {496)) fig. on pp. 233, 2475 #435 #595 251 = Baraden (1966) pls. LHICLX on pp. 276-82 UPPLEMENT TO LATE ROMAN POTTERY & 4 3 (Fo. gfe) no. 14Gb, with fig. on p. 45. Variant type, with DATING-EVIDENCE Some significant changes in the dating proposed for ARS forms in LRP are now indicated: (2) Finds from Ostia and other sites suggest that the and century datings proposed Were on average about 20 years too early: ic. what was considered Trajante should probably be Hadrianic, and so on. ‘The dates in LRP, based partly on a reassess- ‘ment of the Western finds, were largely a reaction to what then considered to be the ‘excessively long time-spans forthe T-S. chiara A types proposed by Lamboglia (1958). AFRIC N RED SLIP WARE, While I still old that Lamboglia's terminal dates (in his 1958 article) are on average too late, itis now fairly obvious that my own were too early; the truth should he Somewhere in between. Given the appearance of a few ARS Ware vessels at Pompeii the initial dates forthe andl century types are probably not far olf the mark, bout they probably took some time to become well established; the period of ma ‘exportation to Italy and the western provinces probably did not start until Hadrianie times ¢. 4.0. 110-120 (rather than ¢, 96-100). This change-over has to be seen in relation to the fortunes of the Italian TS industry, whieh was still flourishing and exporting in quantity (at least to Greece and Cypes) in Trajanie times. A cor spectus of the Hadrianie phase is provided by Carandini ¢f a in Ova iii, The terminal date of the very common rouletted versions of the bowls Forms 8 and should be extended until at least the 186; a Iragment of Form gis present in the ‘Torre Sgurrata wreck, which produced a coin of Commodus.t” On this hasis the later plain versions (Forms 8B, B) should continue at least into the fist two decades ‘or soof the grd century, which explains their presence in some numbers inthe depasie ‘of ¢, 240 published in’ Ostia i, ‘The date-spans of the related late 2udjearly ged century forms (in Carandini’s Az ware) should be extended accordingly. For Form 12, which does not belong here, ee p. 406. (2} Another major realignment of dates is necessary in the Late 4th aol 5th centuries, specifically in the series of products of the Carthage region (Laambogla’s D ware) My dating of lace 4th century forms relied heavily on the interpretation of a large Sequence of dumped fils in the Athenian Agora? which in its lowest levels produced evins no later than a.n, 364-78, but which continued to be deposited until at least, ‘Aw. 4o0 (coins of Arcadius anid Honorius oceur in the upper fills). vom this area ‘came vessels such as Form 61,12 and Form Gz.15, and numerous fragments of stamped vessels in Siyle Ai, Some of these may have heen assigned to too latea phase in the Sequence of deposition, ‘The crucial evidence for this period, which was not ntly appreciated and in part overlooked in LRP, comes from the northern frontier provinces; I have discussed this brielly in recent article? Es of Form 6B and of the flanged bovl Form gab are present in the ehain ofgth e forts in Raetia (in particular those on the Moosberg an the Lorenzberg),# wh historieal grounds must be considered to lave been abandoned mest likely in the 30s, and at the very latest by shorlly afer 40. The coin-evidenee leans towards ihe earlier date for the eesation of continuous occupation, as also does the asstimp. tion of a regular supply-system implicit in the preseace of appreciable quantities Of long-listance imports from the Mediterranean, "The oceasional eceurrence of sherds of Forms 6:B and g1 Bin the Agora ils mentioned above was first interpreted 2 Foe this wreck, se (el: G:F Bs) A Hit af Hayes (1479 Sefer Sd New Yk oe ye I Cac Mads Men Mchny sf 8 ya pty +400 p. 0 gf) toring ple ag 7 shah ya, roth wet a te Stoa oF Atal. "TH, yng Yero-tg ay srt Ge ols an ea Wee tae the ey wall the pes snd chee tone Dr Fach i pet (tae, 1) ta 6 Uiugoen, may have sored an majorly rabigh Rae 97 yey tog thumps Por farther finds frm the ares, te the Hae 9 esti efor on the later Roman pstery in the Senin the regina we. Were, ‘Ape serie (I< W Mages al Johny othe Fy ato, cong rial evidence Der enshrg sti516 SUPPLEMENT TO LATE ROMAN POTTERY as proofof ater intrusions—there are indeed ter disturbances in the atea, whose ‘exact extent i diffeule 19 determine owing to a very complicated stratigraphical sequence, imperfectly recorded, ut must now be reastessed, On the new evidence, Form 61B, and with it Siyle A (ii) stamped decoration, should appear c ‘x, 98, and Form G14 and its associated A(ii) stamps come to an end at that point in time or shortly thereafter." A possible corollary of this is that AGii) deooration and its asiciated vessel-formis end earlier chan was supposed. To longer hold to a ‘ate aera. 450 for Form Gt-28, whieh is the only evidence fora late terminal-tate, and in view of other vessels found with it eould well be resid, Frcs evidence from assessment of the Sétif finds, serve to confirm the late 4th century beginning forthe flanged howls of Form gr indicated by the bowl ofthis form from the Moosberg (sce above, Form yt.go} A new scheme for the development of this form has recently been published.2 ‘This involves a reasestuent ofthe dating of the other listed examples of Form 911, though these are fairly clearly a! Carthage products, Given the existence of the form before 400, it now seems reasonable to place the Karauis finds (Fora 91.36, fro) in broad terms the fit halfof te 5th century, whieh fits more satisfactorily the coin-seqjuence from that site, which is almost completely devoid of the issues of the later 5th eentury emperors, common enough elewhere in Egypt. Tt also explains the absence at Karanis of the series Forms 82-85; these were presumably imported into Egypt therlater. One consequence ofthe carlir dating of most ofthe sth eentury groups at Karanis is that Form 93 and the first howls of Farm 9 (which oceur in some Of these groups) smust be dated earlier, ‘The latter form may algo be observed at Conimbsiga in what may be ap. 465 or 460 contexts It may be remarked passing dhat Form 91B, aud also Forny Bo (now attested at Carthage in the early 5th {contury) are the Lcest Alfican shapes found on a whole series of rural sites in Hay {in SS Birurizand elsewhere), which fits in well with x hypothesis ofwidespread abandon= ‘ment aboat the time of the Vandal incursion in 455 oF during the troubled years following it? Several examples of Form qiB ate lso present in the early th ‘century wreek-deposit at Port-Miou.! uch realignment of dates tends to open wp a gap in the middle and later years of the sth century, at least for the ‘Carthage’ (T'S. chiaralafrcana D) series, for which fixed points are scarcely available again until the early Gth century. Recent finds {rom Carthage, especialy from the British excavations seem to indicate the presence of a whole ringe of ARS shapes, appasently belonging the Vasual period, whieh do not fit neatly into my typology, and which were rarely exported.” These point to “Eoramc ft Dnen fa hi pl LIU; ako dicuon in prio, eotaning dete of ural bX nial Combe iv (95) 28099 an Tinga A Comanniomasine ot 'sly “TCE the inst neal bork Sol and at the "Dues Mint (Ceij. H995) BH, gee apall antlage pice im Ala Pacers (8) De Lae in etait Case ex (0959) So ae anter interpretation of dhe frm o the gu) which ala tem sternite a Stat ‘SS Siu tres fet nu (ceprodaced Bets ot Cate. Migon ann gn APRICAN RED SLIP WARE ae jor shift in trading patterns, coinciding more or less with the Vandal take-over ofthe city. ‘This, already surmised for the Mediterranean as a whole, may nov be ‘observed happening at the local level also. It may be suggested that local disrap- tions in the Carthage region, which had up to then been the ehiet supplier of the ‘export trade, caused the rapid decline of the local fine pottery industry, either from 430 (the first arrival ofthe Vandals) or from c. 439 (the date ofthe fal of Carthage), ‘The series of dishes and bowls with Style A stamps could all date from before then (except perhaps fora few debased examples like Form 61.35)... Its posse tat the manufacturers of Forms g1B and 93 did not go under until « ite later (hence theie appearance at Karanis in groups without Style A iit vesels); they may have con- tinued large-scale production long enough 10 benefit from the decade of relative peace prior co the death of Valentinian THI in 455. _‘Theveafier a drastie change in trading-patterns scems to have occurred, with the Central Tunisian manuficturets of Forms 82-85 coming to the fore, and exporting—in die course, and perhaps not regularly until. 475-—primarily to Eastern markets, which were no longer importing from their old suppliers. Such products did not ofien travel West, though some local imitations are discernible at Carthage. ‘The reemongence of Carthage as i city in the late Vandal period finally brought aboue a return to the okl pattern of exports, though by thea the Eastern market was well supplied with ‘competing products, ‘A note of caution should perhaps be interjected here: our waderstanding of the sequence of developments dung the sth century remains defective, and the above remarks should not be taken as more than & working hypothesis, which may yet he drastically altered by the publication of new materia (3) ‘The most distinctive vessel-form ofthe 7th century, the dish Form ro9, should be dlated later than was originally indicated, Its attested in a context of ab. 675-1 at rds occur regularly in late 7th century levels thers, whieh suggests ned, somewhere in the Carthage region, until around the date of the final Arab take-over in 698. ‘This late occurrence easts doubt on the early ing suggested for the large group of Istanbul finds cited in. LAP 1725 these now seem more likely to be among the latest material in their deposit, to be dated e, 65 1670, in which case no conclusive evidenee is available for the existence of the shape before 600. ‘The Antioch finds suggest an initial date alfier Gro. My suggested dates for Form rag are now ¢. 610/20—¢. 680-700. ‘A few seraps of other forms from the latest Byzantine levels at Carthage show & similar line-burnished treatment—notably some stall flanged howls which should be the ultimate version of Form gr. Some kitehen-ware versions of the wate, wih- outa slip, are present in the same deposits CENTRES OF PRODUCTION As Lamboglia highlighted in his last survey,* the major production-centees of ARS. Ware have not yet been discovered—indeed, he remained sceptical to the enxl of ait Afvican source for the major series, preferring to view the known Afvieat workshops ee Hayes in Ramat ot tage. Micki i 4 75, Degas XXIV, we Bea Ss ‘Lamberts (74) 150-7, 0,5 SUPPLEMENT TO LATE ROM. ax merely the offshoots of an industey posibly centred elsewhere, However, the recent series of excavations at Carthage have elarified the issue, even though they have not revealed any actual Kln-sites. On statistical grounds, it ean now be inferred quite clearly thac the main sevies of 78 chiralafriona A and D (the latter in both its th and Gth century varieties) ie. ‘Late Roman B ware~and the u slipped eooking.ware Forms 195-197 are native to the Carthage region, ‘The class versions of these wares occur in great profusion there,! and no imitations in red= slipped fabries are present—in contrast to eg. the material in Manchester from the Cap Bon peninsula, whieh is not homogeneous, and ineludes some ‘local’ red-slip wares. Moreover, the various classified “Central Tunisian’ produets are rare {except for the ubiquitous dishes of Form 50). The faces present at the neighbouring site of Utica seems similar.? In the later (i. 6th century) levels at Carthage, bowls identifiable as products of the Oudna kilns occur, but ate greatly outnumbered by vesels of Forms 99, 103, 104, ete. with a coarser Fabric and thicker, brighter slip One may merely speculate as to the whereabouts of the workshops which produced them and the earlier ‘Carthage’ wares—pechaps they lie buried under the aecurmula- ted silts of the Bagradas (Medjerda) valley. Carthage may be assumed to have served as the main export outlet for these Factories, in addition to being a major ‘onsumer itself The kitchen-ware (unslipped) series corresponding to these products comprises Forms 195-197 (perhaps also 194, to8),4 which are present in Carthage deposits of the and century and later in similar quantities tothe fine wares and, like them, have no real competitors.? One sherd from the Miebigan excavations at Carthage is virtually a waster (or at least a ‘Sceond!).* ‘This series emenges around the Tate ast century A.D. as an offshoot of the standard Early Roman cooking ware of the tarthage region,? which was itself exported fairly widely from Tiberian or ealy Clauedian times onwards ‘The earlier ware is similar i texture, but consistently yellowish or brownish in colour, without the brick-red tint of the later series; both fabrics tend to be fired grey-black on the expoted part of the exterior, and hence ave been lumped together under the terms ‘vasi a patina cenerognola’ and ‘piatti orlo annerito’ (see Lamboglia, Carandini and others). While vessels of Forms 195~ 17 were exported widely only in the period ¢, 100-250, numerous finds from Carthage show that variants of these shapes in slightly coarser and thicker ware continued to circulate locally much later, until ¢. 400 i not indeed down to the arrival ofthe Vandals? "They remained the typical local kitehien-ware until the ene N POTTERY See J.-A. ley, in Euan of Crthge «Hayes amd Riley, in Facet at Cartage Midge 84,1929 pas (aes ot fequeney) Mikio 87-1928 ps fe rihcmingpabicton ofthe Utes nis oy gr. Wa aD. Sen 1 hi. gan a ae abo tales aga "or the general patter of alain Roman (Holy Rowan Coking We tnd post Roman times, eC. Vie Tina, ‘The "Ror some examples fom Oia and Con, sce ‘Malton Vall Geel Change in Mitread Caran fay ut Wg 10744 (ean Tine (Cambri, 1969) ahh terence 40 the Dat Ties e241. and. he Dy Medea valley ps3zab0°T. W. Poster, in Wald Coa! the Erion Pty (ALAR sea, Rey hari it? (Ot. 1996) 207-4. 970) 9 no 2-25, 49-51 74-77. Ba 41-49 ‘Storm rea shou be vogaied 363 diinet (Wlententionveried Wy gern open} wate they are nat common song the Carthige "For he eileen sve Eat! of Cage ia Magan 6, 9; tn. "foe comments an percentage fequence, se AVRICAN RED SLIP WARE, 519 of the 4th century, along with flatased dishes of Form 26 (sce ‘Type Series) and bowls of Form ro; late stuvivors of the TS africana sz sevies wish a thin dull slip. Presumably these shapes were not produced in the sane workshops as the 4th century TS africana D dishes and bowls, chough their body-clay is extremely similar. ‘Among discoveries further south in Tunisia, one may inelude the plaster lamp and appliqué moulds noted on p. 480, ‘The former may well represent a single discovery somevsheve in the zone between Sousse and Sbeitla—no precise details are available. Pressimably the unsaleable fragments from the eache--if such it remain on the ground somewhere near the original findspot, and may one day be observed. OF the appliqué moulds, the Toronto speciment (from x private collec tion) is stated to have been acquired by its former owner some Go miles south of Sousse (ie. in the Ras Kaboudia-—Djebiniana region?), though whether it was found there isnot clear. ‘The production centre(s) for the finer class of Afsican lamps con- stituting my Type ILA remain undiscovered, though they ean ardly have been the same as thote in the el-Djem region which produced the early lamps of transitional character defined by Salomonson2 ‘These are of a coarser fabric and are more roughly made—as are virtually all the lamps exhibited in the el-Djem Museum, ARTISTIC CONNECTIONS “The influence of contemporary silverware on African Red Slip Ware veste-forms of the qth century and later has been further confirmed. It ean now be shown that the African potters consistently turned to that source for models, presumably in response to the demands of the metropolitan societies among whose upper ranks the silver iginals circulated. A hoard of silver from the Eastern Empire, now in Munich, provides models for Form 67.4 The date of these bowls, if really as early as it dicated by the three associated dishes bearing medallions of Lieinius T and 11 (on the basis of which Overbeck postulates a date of deposition around a.b. 324) poses problems for che initial date for Form 67 in ARS. All that can be said at present is that no examples of the ARS shape have yet been found in contexts s0 early, though Porm 67.30 (See above) seems to carry the form back to the very beginnings of Style A if decoration—ie. c. 350, ifstyle isa safe guide to date. The silver bowls in the ‘Munich’ hoard bear simple mouldings and greaves on the oor (ef. Form (67.1719), but also heading on the rim—a common feature of 4th century silverware, butone never copied on erm 67. Ihe (wo smaller bovls (Overbeck's nos 8,9) ate matched in ARS hy Form 67/71 (sce above, p. 485)... ‘The medallion dishes and inscribed bowls from the hoard (Overbeck’s nos. 1-5) provide further models for 1 ed 5 ig a yp 5-6 : b wea gn52486 aphconnry group Carnal (876) 1Xiomonan (18) HY ey (hg) este age of orm no clini te ih ta 94-7. ae eb I conary date for iar stage onthe hase of. Oreck, dogma Romer in Sind Be corn Ent om Carihages T comider the sor shbaninee Penignchte (otonche, 157) {Gagmentry) example Cad ia cite Uter Fer inne reader Form 7, spc thane yor tobe soda. ate wait ee Pn (pp. 3b-a wih photogs pp 24 aed St colin ier there wl avurd dcmldle eon i 3 keg cenary oe p85 above)