Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Many cases are dismissed before a plea or trial. Learn about the common
reasons why.
Not every defendant who faces criminal charges will proceed to trial or a
plea. Many cases end up being dismissed, by the prosecutor or the court.
The first task for a defense attorney in a criminal case is to determine
whether there are any grounds on which the case could be dismissed
before a plea or trial. Some grounds for dismissal include:
In order to arrest a person, police must have probable cause to believe that
the person committed a crime. A police officer cannot arrest a person
simply because he has a gut feeling that the person just robbed the liquor
store down the street. The officer must have a reasonable belief based on
objective factual circumstances that the person robbed the store. For
instance, after the liquor store robbery, an eye witness to the robbery
describes the robber to the police officer as a person wearing a red jacket
with a dragon emblem and boots and carrying a knife with a long blade and
a black handle. If the officer sees a person matching that description hiding
in a doorway down the street, he likely has probable cause to arrest.
1
Mistake in Criminal Complaint
2
Insufficient Evidence
Prosecutor’s Discretion
When thinking about getting charges dismissed, most of the time people
are concerned with not going to trial or entering a plea, as the above
scenarios explain. But there's another way to get charges dismissed, even
4
if the case has gone to trial and the defendant has lost. A convicted
defendant who wins his case on appeal can sometimes secure an order
from the appellate court that the lower court (the trial court) dismiss the
case or enter a judgment of acquittal (rather than retry it).
A bad arrest or search
An order to dismiss a case can occur when the appellate court, having
reversed the conviction on the grounds of a bad search or arrest, examines
what's left of the case and determines that there is not enough evidence to
warrant another trial. For example, if the case is overturned based on
insufficient evidence to support the defendant's arrest (and no other
evidence suggests that the defendant would have been arrested anyway
for this crime), the court may conclude that there is no remaining evidence
to tie the defendant to the crime.
Similarly, if the appellate court rules that a search was unconstitutional, and
further rules that the evidence may not be considered, that may leave the
prosecution with not enough evidence to support a finding of guilt on one or
more elements of the charge.
Now and then, an appellate court will reverse a finding of guilt on the
grounds that the jury did not have enough evidence to support its
conclusion. Most of the time, the defense will have asked the trial judge to
enter a judgment of acquittal, before the case went to the jury, and the trial
judge will have denied that motion.
On appeal, the defendant makes the same argument; occasionally, he
wins. The appellate court reverses and directs the trial judge to enter a
judgment of acquittal.
No jurisdiction
Courts can hear only those cases that they have the power to hear, which
is given to them by legislators and the constitution. Now and then, a court
oversteps its bounds and hears a case it has no right to hear. For example,
5
federal courts can try cases that arise on federal property, but not state
property. Imagine a robbery on land that the federal trial court thinks is
owned by the government, but it turns out (on appeal) that the property is
state land. The federal appellate court would overturn the conviction
(leaving the state free to charge the offense in state court). A trial in state
court would not involve a violation of double jeopardy, because the federal
and state courts are different sovereigns.