This document contains information about a physics experiment conducted by a group of students at Universidad Autónoma De Nuevo León Preparatoria 15 Madero. The experiment measured the specific heat of various materials, including iron, copper, graphite, gold, beryllium, and aluminum, using a virtual heat simulation. The students recorded the heat absorbed by samples of each material of varying masses when heated. They then calculated the average specific heat measured and compared it to literature values, finding differences ranging from 85% to over 100%. In their conclusion, they note that specific heats can vary widely between materials and it may take some practice to obtain accurate data from the virtual simulation.
This document contains information about a physics experiment conducted by a group of students at Universidad Autónoma De Nuevo León Preparatoria 15 Madero. The experiment measured the specific heat of various materials, including iron, copper, graphite, gold, beryllium, and aluminum, using a virtual heat simulation. The students recorded the heat absorbed by samples of each material of varying masses when heated. They then calculated the average specific heat measured and compared it to literature values, finding differences ranging from 85% to over 100%. In their conclusion, they note that specific heats can vary widely between materials and it may take some practice to obtain accurate data from the virtual simulation.
This document contains information about a physics experiment conducted by a group of students at Universidad Autónoma De Nuevo León Preparatoria 15 Madero. The experiment measured the specific heat of various materials, including iron, copper, graphite, gold, beryllium, and aluminum, using a virtual heat simulation. The students recorded the heat absorbed by samples of each material of varying masses when heated. They then calculated the average specific heat measured and compared it to literature values, finding differences ranging from 85% to over 100%. In their conclusion, they note that specific heats can vary widely between materials and it may take some practice to obtain accurate data from the virtual simulation.
TEACHER: JUAN EFRAIN GONZALEZ FLORES 2055592 ROSALES GUERRERO VALERIA ABIGAIL 2055465 SANCHEZ IBARRA KAROL MICHELLE 2055552 SANCHEZ ORTIZ OSCAR GERARDO 2055457 TOVAR SALAZAR EMILIO 2055570 ZAMORA GOMEZ ANALUCIA 2055564 ZUÑIGA MEZA FATIMA THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK Specific beat. A physical quantity defined as the amount of heat that must be supplied to a unit mass of a thermodynamic substance or system to raise its temperature by one unit; it is measured on various scales. Law of conservation of energy. States that the total amount of energy in any isolated physical system remains invariant over time, although this energy can be transformed into another form of energy.
Virtual Simulation of Heat.
IRON. COPPER.
GRAPHITE. GOLD.
BERYLLIUM. ALUMINUM.
Specific heat of the material.
m= m = 0.04 m = 0.06 m = 0.07 C material C material % Material 0.02 kg kg kg kg (average) (Table 2.6 difference or internet) Iron 476.283 J 454.418 J 450.1 J 449.857 J 457.6645 J 450 J 101.7 % Copper 364.5 J 372.798 J 376.148 J 385.8 J 374.8115 J 387 J 96.85 % Graphite 691.461 J 703.074 J 715.085 J 712.847 J 705.6167 J 502 J 140.56 % (carbon) Gold 104.912 J 131.635 J 123.169 J 136.080 J 123.949 J 129 J 96.08 % Beryllium 1801.016 J 1820 J 773.139 J 1826.743 J 1555.2245 J 1825 J 85.21% Aluminum 908.837 J 900,508 J 890.638 J 900.215 J 900.0495 J 900 J 100.0055% ASDFG Conclusions. Only a large difference is found from the first average value of the virtual simulator to the second specific heat of the materials exceeding the total value or almost passing it. We conclude that with this rigorous exercise it can take some time to get the data and that the materials have a wide range of heat transfer, so that from one to the other there is a large difference in the results.