Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Groningen, on 14 Jun 2018 at 09:31:24, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107337374.014
THE SITE OF EL GERZEH
here and there a bleached piece of bone, showing only cemeteries of El Amrah. At every revision the
too plainly that they have suffered the usual fate of ranges put forward in Diospolis Parva are of course
Egyptian tombs in having been plundered. liable to some slight expansion, as they were not the
3. In trenching round the pre-dynastic cemetery, result of an exhaustive study of the whole civilisation
we found another curious one, consisting of only nine of pre-dynastic Egypt, but only of a study of that
graves, most of which were plundered, probably owing portion of it exhibited in a small number of ceme-
to the fact that they had been dug in the higher teries. The types which bear only one isolated, or
ground around the edges of the pre-dynastic wady. several isolated, dates will be especially liable to
The skeletons that remained were in the very con- revision, for the isolation of these dates implies that
tracted position of the proto-dynastic period, with the only a single specimen was found, and that it occurred
head N. or rather N.E. (see pi. i, 1). The only objects at that date in the original 900 graves, which formed
obtained from these nine graves were three small lime- the corpus. If there are but one or two isolated
stone vases of iind-dynasty shape, as El Antrak and dates, it means that the type only occurred once or
Abydos, pi. xvi, no. 8, a few fragments of a beautiful twice, and therefore its history was not sufficiently
rosy pink limestone table of offerings, and a piece of known to provide a range.
a large finely worked alabaster bowl. This small 5. Below is a list of additions necessary to be made
isolated community seems strange. We may well to the isolated dates already published, to make them
ask, how did nine individuals come to be inhabiting coincide with the ranges of the groups of pottery
the neighbourhood apparently all by themselves, with with which these types were found at El Gerzeh.
no immediate predecessors and their nearest suc- Yet out of the whole cemetery it is only necessary to
cessors being presumably at the end of the iiird make additions to seventeen types, and it will be seen
dynasty more than four miles away at Meydum? Quite on looking down the list that the additions are very
close to these nine graves was a wide layer of black slight, and that no alteration of the general position
ashes, from which we were unable to obtain any- of the type in the sequence of dates is required. For
thing beyond the ashes. Lastly we may note that instance, only a single pot of the type P 94 b was
there were a number of Bedawy ezbeks scattered all found at S.D. 46 in the original making up of the
round these cemeteries and all close to the Fayum corpus.
road. Now however at El Gerzeh this type is found—
again as an isolated specimen—occurring in grave 63,
whose range, deducible apart from this pot, is S.D.
CHAPTER II 52-68. It is therefore evident that this type did not
THE SEQUENCE DATING show its full range at Naqada and Diospolis, but had
a range extending from 46—as found before—to at
By GERALD WAINWRIGHT
least 52, the lowest number at which it would
4. WHILE working up the results obtained from correspond to the range of the other pots found with
the pre-dynastic cemetery, there was good opportunity it at El Gerzeh. A check is supplied by the allied
for adding to the system of Sequence Dates set out type P 94 a which is found at the intermediate dates
in Diospolis Parva. The check on the general accu- S.D. 50, 51. The extension of P 94 £ to S.D. 52 then
racy of this system is the more satisfactory as it is is quite consistent, and the sequence date of P 94 £
supplied from a very different part of the country, will in future read S.D. 46, 52.
El Gerzeh being some 200 miles north of Naqada The types, which showed a clear range in the
and Diospolis Parva, on the pottery of which places corpus, naturally did not require so much expansion
the arrangement was built up. We now know that in their sequence dates as did those isolated ones.
this sequence dating is not a local affair applicable As a matter of fact, out of the whole cemetery only
only to the South country, but extends over the the four ranges given below had to be expanded at
whole land. As was found by Randall-Maclver at all to make them fit, and these four expansions were
El Amrah, the sequence dates of the pots in any only very slight. For instance, a specimen of D 59 b
given grave coincide closely one with another. Had was found in grave 139. The range of this grave
the ranges been derived from a faulty system, this according to its types of pottery, other than D 59 b,
could hardly have occurred time after time, as it did, was S.D. 62-66. Again, in grave 169, otherwise
in some 290 graves at El Gerzeh, as well as in the ranging from S.D. 61-62, a specimen of D $gb was
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Groningen, on 14 Jun 2018 at 09:31:24, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107337374.014