. Maw. RULE IN RYLANDS V FLETCHER 1. The Rule In Rylands v Fletchers a rule of (A) vicarious lability. © ster iabity (©) Inditferent iabiity. (0) negligence kabity 2. Which ofthe following judges is crecited for propounding the Rule in Ryans? (A) Lord Gott. (8) Lord Dening. (O") Justice Blackburn (©) Lord Moulton. 3. Which of the following isa difference between the Rule in Rvlandsand nuisance. (A) Rylands v Fletcher's confined to accumulation of intangibies which escape ‘and do damage whereas nuisance is confined to accumulation of tangibles which do not escape. (8) Rylends v Fletcher's confined to accumulation of intangibles which do not ‘escape whereas nuisance is confined to accumulation of tangibles winieh ‘escape and do damage, (©) Rylendis v Fletcher is confined to accumulation of tangibles wihich do not escape whereas nulsance is confined to accumulation of intangibles wihicn ‘escape and do damage. Ryfends and Fletcher is confined to accumulation of tangibles which escape and do damage whereas nuisance is not 30 confined. 4. Which of the following is a difference between the Rule in Rylands and nuisance, (GD) In kylanas v Hetcher there must be accumulation of things, in nuisance there is no requirement of accumulation, Page of 58spor 38e ‘vousioly pue spueyiy Jepun LoREWLI| YAS OU St voip :pue! sesh fesmeu-uou jo sase> oj pouyuen 5} eouesinu wt aiaen gong, 51 Gumoyos ax JO UPIUAL “pue} jo sesn jean 20 yeumyeu-vou «x pauyuoo you st Aaigey ‘2ouesh ur pue URAL A spuerky L9pUN ROG CC) feuywanofpe Jo 01dna00 ue 5} own ued ‘saseo .o4rraLy 4 sauety UL () ouesinu uy YOReWI YBN OU s] 81849 UE] Jo sasn jeumgeu jo s3se9 «2 pouuod S| JoyaneLy A spuerte pun Anger CG) sour pue spueyes 19pun YORE LONE OU St ‘au pe} Jo s9sn fezmyeu-uou jo s95e2 oy pauyuod si souesinu ul fangesT —() cons $1 BuIMO}O} aun JO LOIN pu saan neu 10 feayeu-vou ‘o2 pouyvoD you S| Aymqey “eoUesINU UL PUR 4AYOIAE A spuerty sepun oa (a) pues uy uone rs ou 5 asta ‘0 soon emeu-uou jo soso 1 oun aaypay a puny spun Asaer) CG) “apuesmy ul uoReA Ys OS 22049 01 Jo S2sn yeunyeu Jo S9Se2 0} PAUYUCD 5) JBYAIAY A -spueydy spun Kwgen (8) wayoreyg A spuerdyy sepUN VORENW YDNS OU St sua ‘pe jo szn euneu-vu yo 05> pour sanvesru ul ANReN ona 2 Guage FLORA ans yywue> vost y wens sass eye SPUR JOpUN st ‘roves wane Kew pue} Butpe yo sadnono ata si uw aed WCQ) ssn y 8 2d8359 UP ‘>uRB spa jeune poygpuinse Jo adeno ue wg Kew asaquovciay « pues ut (2) aes us uoneR pr ou 512118 uot Jo son fem yo sosea cn pouyusn Aye 24M A sever I (@)14, 18, (ors on nd bua by he tenant expe andes eon the plant acon lr, (1 Rods ae Shed wath ese and thewn oo pans dye land, CH) Water wich rua exts on he dtd an and ows tom serous tin of eet ad ont the pans sone ines by pectin and free rey, (1 efoto cutiates pants on Ns and we ecape ons tea land. Wich ote fooning is ues @) TaWony setue (5) TaMenlyarete (Tatton sae @ wewonyactve Lend Alki judgment in Donoghue v Stevenson contained how sn elements? )bwo s@) three (© four (2) five 1. Which of the folowing is referred to a the narrow ration Donoghue v Stevenson A(A) A manufacturer owes a duty of care towards consumers oF users of histher products not to cause them harm, (8) Lack of privity of contract did not prevent the claimer from aiming (9) Nealgence was accepted asa separate tort ints oun ight, (©) "Negligence would be proved by satsying a three part test. Page Sof 589540998 sous6y6ou a) ue} o1ssedsan (9) souesinu ayqnd (8) souesinu arend (Vv) coveds Axdiwa e1n sity Buywoy atp Jo woIyM :wueN Jo AqgeasH9} UO Pasea urea se payaueps s! yo yor aig ‘aydouud noquslau, 94) wos eypraty » spueyey sopun (a) aouatiau ur @)) sesea aouesinu sand ut (8) sose> apenud aouesinu y ul (¥) jpamo sy ase Jo Aap saiaum ysiqerse 0} pesn say e stay qaiémuud anoqubju, 2 St 1e4NK vn'nnt @ AN ©) Apue mn ‘n‘t (a) Apue ALI Cv) ones moueu, aL — (A) ‘yo ved son v Bayes fg pow} 2 pra 2u25N pun eeu poy.os go 93 p hap v 9 enero on SUMED pea AULD osu oy aney a nonaeou pp penvOD 7 Bud (A sv uno my rates y se prize sem 25N pine ase er 81 Lu awewpnt sunray pi07 ul queWIy® [eID a10M BuNMOYO) aA 40 BHO! 40 240 “ZT20. 24, 2 Which Judge is erected for the ground breaking judament in Conaghus v ‘Stevenson (1932) AC 562. (A) Lord Goff (©) Lor Denning © ora atin (0) Lord Wiberforce hich ude is rested forthe etghbour pine? 0) tord Got (2) Lord Greene (© Lord Denning © Lord atin ‘The judgment in Donoghue v Stevenson is ground break because; (Anew approach was necessary since no other action was available (1) _Itidentiied negligence as a separate tort in its own right (IN) It devised the appropriate tests for determining vinsther negligence has actually occurred, ()Tand 1 only (8) Tand M1 only (©) Wand only @® sitera tony Page of $8avepuajap atn Aa pamo inp e time Aq paxy AINp @ Zuopesvadwioy (a) sobewep je10u06 or ewe avy SunaLE Janp Jo ypeoxg @ fiepuajap ain Aq pare Ainp & ‘mei Aa paxy Amp ¥ (G) vogesuadwoo ‘a Aq oxy Aino & :soSewep jesoun6 04 weweD SoARUD LUN AMP JO yPe=IGY (B) aououip ‘vonesuaduo ‘mal Aq paw inp y —(W) yoy jo saw ¢ 219 WEN qyBu §| @y sue; oy UoSIad y (0) 1wOno1g 5130, WED e Lo BUY (0) BWLD ul uoRDe Ue BujbUNg — (@) 0 uy woe ue BuBAHS Cp vosied aig s!quewiep y aueWHED e 504, ‘Aaqiges asjes anaid oy sey auewtep ou, (4) a6euep arc en anew rou seop wewiep au GD) uum or0i8 6 ancy 30u seop ywewep au (2) Gucwm sarod quewiep ay. (Vv) soso 40,30) vowse ve 5141 {25 Jod ajgeuoaze 51 2eHNA, buona buows wy (9) Guo jouw (a) ssedsany (v) uo si eum TUOLIOSHTATINTET WHINIS 9% st we edsso] eoueUy And yum asoun or (a) paraye are sisarayu awoudds asoym asoun or (9) ‘> aygouosees ayes 0} une) Aq paREYE ‘99 0} Api) se UaesoI0} UdEq AnEY ARREUDSER! YBN oUM aEO1R OV AUO <{)) luonse aun Aq parses ARDaup 250% 01 uO (¥) amo st Amp e ‘soue6y60u UL ‘aaeregep si! (a) pouunoa ken (G) pm semje st (9) pany Skene st (¥) poo snp e wou 0 S084 0 sep ou, cussion amie ot (@) aouaumep amsv2o1 (9) aue> sjoeuaseas ayo} (€) AuuBoqut Aypog suosied © uo Bubuus wo) ure o1 2) ‘st Aqnp aun Jo aangeu aug ‘pabaye si uosaad 24 0} ssedeaa nm32. 33, 4 35, In torts which are actionable per se, the injury sustained; (A) must be psychiatric (8) must be physical damage @©) must be such that the infingerent of the right must be regarded as Injury enough (©) must be economic loss Damages refer to; (A) the harm done to somebody's reputation (®) physical and psychiatric damage © compensation awarded by the court ina successful claim (©) economic and psychiatric damage (ne of the elements of tors ia dty feed by aw. THs means tha (8) he rece ae at (8) th duty uot fed by sae © trey 2 ty wc the courts have rcngied (©) the dityisoned generay ‘One of the elements of tor is that the duty fixed by law must be owed generally ‘This means that; (A) the duty must necessarily be owed, (B) the duty must be a general duty 2 general duty is owed to any person to bring an action based on that tort. (0) _ the general public must recognize tas a éuty Page 10015846, 37, Two Students gave two diferent arsirs a the aim ofthe iw of tts is (To compensate someone whe has suffered @ wrong at the hand of the defendant cel, ee (11) To deter persons from acting in sucha way that another person's rights ‘areinfringed —«y Which of the following answers is correct ®) Tonly (8) tenly (©) Neither 1 nor tr @®> both 1 and 11 ‘A numberof interests have been claimed rightfully or wrorgfuly asthe interests which the law of torts protects ©) economic interest (1) personal security. (ID) property (IV) reputation (A) 1, Mand It only (8) 1, Mand WV only © t,tand W ony G® Alor the above Vierouslibilty means; (4) "Tete are joint tort feasors, (©) Is not ator in sett but a means of imposing labilty of somebody who is responsi forthe to. Faso. (©) Isto by means of which ably is imposed onthe tortfeasor 28 well as somebody responsible for He tort feosor (©) Is atort by means of which fabilty is imposed on several tor ‘easors age 1 of 58as sort etta By seed e op ca vont 0 preps paunbose pour crasnyes (©) prepues pounbas e ou oy one) (@) ucun op co uoqua) CW) ‘sueou ane eps ut “Yea Aaa} O24 UED HHH EH $06 OBEpE PO AL Augen eins) Agen wor) angen woes oN (@) Aaigenares —(W) quepuajap ain yo wed a4) UO yey MOYS 02 BAEU 28 5200 weep aim esau su) 0) SB; z cower Suojoy axa u Mowe cry suoRdo aig Bun deb O48 US ‘aqyew pue arrow (a) ‘yew pue vonuarr (BD) uoquatut pue eau suow (@) say sae pue eau suow —(¥) ‘ore asa quensjas ave Soners JeOW ONG 04 UI ‘Augen fes9nes pue wor (Q) to) ‘Augen snoweoin (a) Augen wor CW) vans ag Seine Sumo} Jo pu ed 8 9 aay ye vane an uve eLIED 2 LEED Ae oy Suny SH suo nn am 33 96 Spe auo Ho Su Ing eLP OU suo; ge Apweedes 0g UES a LD ue SEE) YN Bx Hg SH ep © BuHOHO kh te id oF 6(0) Sufficienty being careless 4. A parton carves ot tres acon heron of arcter parson, The pase esis iad @ sierre towers corn athens @ weal a reuar (0) common and joint tort feasors 4. Injury through a tortuous act results from the cumulative effect of more than ‘one person acting independently. The wrong doers are known as (A) joint tort feasors (8) common tort feasors (©) several tort feasors (©) common & joint tort feasors 45. Whats the pxncple in @ Bradford Corparaion v Pikes (1895) @ The nature ofthe motive with which an act is done does not in ‘general mak that act unlawful and a tort (8) The nature of the motive with which an act is done makes that act unlawful only (©) The nature of the motive with which an act is done makes that act a tort only (0) The nature of the motive that act both unlawful and a tort Page 13 0f 58sssor a8eg Aqunwwos 2p 4o pool uounuoo axa 13 29 nu puel axa OBEN Bu) noo adesso fue prays aBewep asec AX 24 {snus apg Jou sno196uep aq ou pooU Buna SUL (i) yetn epns ‘uy 2tn vo Buna ann Burton) ‘suige puejowo ube) CO) ‘puej ayy jo asn jesmeu-uou ‘adeosa ysnu Bung eu — (Al) soo adens9 fue pos aBewep ase 0A 24 zeny nq Js sosebuep 2404 paou Bunn tL CH) oun ons ‘pue un uo BuRA aA BuHdImx (1) ‘una e pueiowo 6ubuua ¢i) (O) ue) aun yo asnyameu-uou ‘adense asm Guna au (N) 3 s0 seco ian a6ewep 3EN=D 0 AHH 28 osje Jsnu pue Jjasy Ul snouaBueP aq ysnu Guna eyL — (IM!) 32 uons ‘pup aug uo Gung ar Guideay — (1) ‘Gunn o puejwo bubwg §—() (@) pe a 30 25m yeameu-uou ‘odesee nis Bua UL (ND yosy uy snoreGuep 2a asus Guna ata saRUTODE (A) revauons‘puel an uo Bunn aka Buds=y (i) ‘Gunn e pve owo Guba) (W) ave suawap au, denn si soun04 A spuey sopun Yona jo sua} aR ge SONAAUAYE BuIHOHO} JO LOLM “9h IaH WaTes jostotea ou26460u UL rarely 9 spueyes 2pU, pug] 0 ssedsaq ut souesinu uy @ 7) (@) Ww) Juad sty 3@ ul a) day asnus ‘sadeoso a1 gi JONDSTW Op o} APSHY GuNpiue aI01R sd09% pue spayo: pue Pue| siy oqo sGuLG asodind UME siy 405 OYM UosIEd y “sume pac" Aq 2529 ames uy ut wawEpnh Spicy Jo 2sno} a1 u| PaypoW se LiNmPeIE sonsNC 4A! JO IURLUEAN{ ‘sue p107 Aq ase> ewes aia Ut UEUIENL pio) JO asnoH aA UI paylpour se auaaID eoRSN ~4W JO qwewHpnl u2ai9 aansn ‘ay Jo quaUpnt uneppeyg aonsne “az Jo weuubpnt @ o (@ w ‘24 I punoy S1eyarely A spuepty Ut aim atA JO GORIUYDP Ou “vouwo at Apess200u ou ‘vedo aun Aa pe 249 ovo WENN Inq pUE| BIA UO AyeIMIeU BULAALY ue aia Jo s9uNo aun Aq puet ain owuo ayBn01q pUE pue| aiA UO AyeIMIeU J0U BUIRAUY ‘ue a4p uy sou. OU BREY AeLL CYM AYE pune 40 J9}dMO20 40 tua 248 Aq pue ain o1¥0IUBNOAG ANG puey AiG LO AyeANREU Ou BuILAAUY ue aug uo Aeargeu 1 worum Busy @ o @® Ww SL/eqoIOY A spuedy sapun OV ai UI WeWWALINDEL Sy OL “r cf e50. In the definition of the rule under Rylosv Fletcher the thing within the rule includes; 1. Explosives ga, petrol or chemicals 1. Water Cade ot Vv. Sewage V Escape offre Which ofthe following relating tothe above are tre? (&) 111, Mend V are te (8) 1) I and Vare tue (©) 1,I,W, Varetue © 11 Mw, vare te St. Under the rule in Rylands v Fletcher there may be lity under the rule forthe escape of fre, Which ofthe following cases s authority fortis assertion? (A) Humphries v Cousins (1877) 2 CPD 239 (B) Giles v Walker (1890) 62 LT 933 @©_ Musgrove vPandelis (1919) 2K 43 (D) Ryland v Fletcher (1866) LR 1 Exch 265 52, Why would a defendant under Rylands v Fletcher notte lable for damage coused by the escape of rocks ona defendant’ ond (@ te rocks are natural on the land (8) Ia saboteurcoused the escape (©) tne damage ad not cause any ftaiies (0) _ If the court is satisfied that the damage is not substantivespadensa pey BuiU aly sjo.quoD asoyr Woy UDsied ayy AJUO (3D) pue| ewe avg equo padeose pey ‘sapoye ain 0 abEWeP two puo} aup saidnas0 oypn uosied sup Ao (A) puey aU | parpaye a oy a6eWEP ‘ai Suisne> Guy aA YM WO UR} BYR SUMO oYM Uosied ay ALO _(V) -quepuayep fenustod e 5; SuMoNO) aR YeurRaL 4 spucHty/seoUESIU UT "9S ‘ay Bujsne Bung aun fojod aygnd se uorpenoxd jeqaWUOsAUD Ut ue] papoye aya Jo uorsassod yerie wl aq snus (0) souesinu ain Aj papaye pus} aun ul IsavaWu (e69} @BAeL 30U paou Ep aouesinu atn Aq para py an Ul sosoWu fet @ any sn (¥) ‘suuewrep/syauierd requaned axa Yowpyery a spuerty UL “S$ eq Moyssnus (a) {oyod sand se uorroid enouvonnsn ust au wa Mo¥s35Na(Q) pue| papaye auf yo uorssassod yerpe ut aq ysnu— () sues oi ka yoye puet a uso: ay ane ou FEE (A) -souesinu ay Aq payzaye pio au ur ysavayUT (eBa] e BABY ysnur —(y) FsqueWwje}a/ssyquIE|d jequayod ayy ‘aouesINU UT “$S saqueyeans 5 a82wep aun An pays sN0> sonyeae ame ou pp abewen nso wavs Conse Aa ue papaya UO UAL 328 20H 4A . bewep 20 2904 aq souziaY 4 spuerty ZopLN UEPLE{—p e PINOM AUR “ES5. 58. © ap am aw) o am ca) a Trespass to land protects landowners from infringements of thelr boundaries The tort of negligence give a right of action where damage is caused as a result of a ‘careless act. “The tort of nuisance comes to the assistancé of a person whose use of land is interfered with indirectly by activities, ‘Statements I, II and II caters for al possible eventualties. ‘Wich of the folowing is true about the above statements? (A) I, Tand If only are true (®) 1, Wand W only are true (©) 1, Mand WV only are tue (©) 1,0, Mand are tue “Trespass to land depends on direct and intentional interference Negligence wil fal i t can be shown that the defendant did all that was reasonable to all that was reasonable to minimize the risk of damage Nuisance will generally only be established ifthe actvily is continuing over 8 period of time even though there can be labilly for a ‘one off incident In rare cases. Trespass to land protects landowners from infringement of their ‘boundaries. Which of the following is true about the above statement? (A) 1,0, Honly are true (®) 1, land IV only are true (© Di Wand tv only are true (0) 1,1 Mand 1V are true Page 18 0f58asso er ates seq Jo speay pue SIapj9 UL “a {oun0D uy Burs SrApIe pUR siaLpow! UaENd aA “> {unos w Bums sioyiou uaend pue Sad a8 8 yunoo uy Burns ‘saqunuuns axa Jo s19p@ pul SRD aL “B) ur papsai tamod jeripnf “exe euojen-aid aun Buna “29 ‘Aaygen ssexdno20 (a) soioty6ou ) ‘souesinu = (g) pue| oy ssedsony (y) “eters 4 spuey cy angeusye Ue se Burmoyoy axa peaid 01 Ajax) ate Joysnayy a spueHy JopUN SIUEWIED SOK souesinu (@)) ue} orssedsaq (5) osiad ain 0} ssedsan (a) sous6ysu Cy) Ur soo! su se4y se4yonaly a spueAy “pur auanelpe Ue Burkdn20 auepuaep ayn Aq patealD soUeSINU Wo siBYINS boyy se jam Se quepUayep ay) Aq pessedsan S| puE| asoyA siaKdno9 (Q) e| SauepUR,EP tA WOM, Bulyiawos Jo adeass qua6yGau-uou e Aq abewep s| pue} asoymn svaidno9 (5) ue] sauepuasap up wow Bunpawos 0 aes abou © Aa paSewep 5 pus eau sxtno00 {@)) srewiue sauepuaye ata Aq pessedsan st pue| asoym sxaidn0g (¥) alata suopems sianco soyaraLy A spUEVy 9 6863, The British Settement Act of 1843 which i. formalised British rule in the Gold Coast i, Authorised the meking of Ordes-n- Counel forthe adoption of formal ows. i, Created @ Supreme court iv, Created a Judicial coun Only tand IL are correct. Only 1 and Ii are corect, C. Only and tare corect. ©. Only Tand 1V are correct. 64. The Bord of 1844 was signed between he A. Colne government andthe ll Ashand Chiefs 1 caoril goverment and the local Ga Chiefs ©) sents gover aot Tanne . colonial government and both the local Fante and Ga Chiefs 65, Prior to the Bond of 1844, the British Crown exercised A. de facto jurisdiction over the territories zlong the coast 8, de jure jurisdiction over the terrteries adjacent to the British forts and settlements de facto jurisdiction over the territories adjacent to the Britsh forts and settlements. D. de jure jurisdiction over the teritories along the coast Poge 20.045866. The Bond of 1844 was a document that ‘acknowledged the pawer and jurisdiction of the Crown B. did not acknowledge the power and jurisdiction of the Crown C. acknowledged the power and juriscicticn of local Fante chiefs D. acknowledged the power and jurisdiction of local Fante and Ga Chiefs 67 The Bond of 1844 was A. was a declaration of war against the Ashantl Chiefs. B.) a declaration tothe effect thatthe first object of the law was the protection of individuals and property and that human sacrifice, panyarring and other —barbarousa customs were abominations and contrary to aw. C. was a declaration of war against the local Fante Chiefs D, was declaration of war against the local Fante and Ashanti Chiefs 68, The Bond of 1844 |}. was a declaration to the effect that the first object of the law was the protection of individuals ané property and that human sacrifice, panyarring and other —barbarous customs were abominations and Contrary ta lawAuthorised the making of Orders-in- Council for the ‘adoption of formal laws. ji, agreed that serious crimes should be tried by the judicial officers of the Crown siting with the chiefs, li, Had the effect of moulding the customs of the country to align, to ‘some degree, with the general principles of British law ‘A. Only Land If are correct. 8B, Only Tl and II are correct Only J and 1 are correct. Or Mand ae cect, Page 210158ps sore aes wuogappsunt wg AYO “0 -vonappsunc uw pue wo wwoa GS) -voroipsung me jevonypen pue mK HO“ vonoipsune met euoapen pue eu) wes spey ‘ues ysnpa 2uy 49pun SURLIOAHS pue suo} ayy 40} 3520) PD aKa UL pousIaeIse NED awaudns 3s} OWL “TL goer “a ear ures ysqig 949 sopun stuawemns pue soy a4) 204 paysiqease sem ne aweidn yEHy aLA SOM A0OK UOIUM UL “OL rey) mee] UST ‘insu 0} wopBuny queysy aun 20) Auo paysyqense sem uno swaxdns e °C “jens USES ‘ain sapun squeWwoRas pue SUO} B42 J0} pays!GeIse sem Ino awiaudNS e quengeuur snouatipul ia Guowe uonpsunf Buscier= way pue|u jo mo) aig 40 sodound aun iam agnedwoo axom zea swowsna —_f€90) aNesC0 OL “seo. POS aU SORUOUIME EAP axgeUD O apes Sem JDUNOD-UrapIO UE CB) ‘aqua ain Jo worsno atp ued Suipuodap _seluLD [euoRypuod pew avo% BuueAUed pur a2yures WeUINY —“Y beet yo puog aun 04 wenbesqns “6972. The first Supreme Court established in the Gold Coast for the forts and settlements under the British realm, was abolished in: A 1848 8 18H, @ 1953 2. 1866 73, The First Supreme Court established in the Gold Coast for the forts and settlements under the British realm, was presided over by A. The Governor A Chief Justice. Dhvisional Court judge Chief Magistrate 74, When the fist Supreme Court established inthe Gold Coast ws abolished, it was replaced by A. The Governor's Court ©) Tre cout ei and criminal justice. ©The Disonal Court D,_ The Chet Magistrate's Court 75. The court that replaced the first Supreme Court established in the Gold Coast was presided over by A. The Governor 8, The Chief Justice, Dione! Court jude ©.) chief Mogistrate Poge 28 0F 58asyorz afey anoge a JoouN —-C -sa6pne ausind any vey} stow ou pue aONSrC JaIYD AUN Jo pasodwuod sem uNoy eu. — “I “sa6pnc ‘ausind 49) vey) avoU! ou pue aoASrC JOIUD AUN JO pasodwwod sem NOD SUL -so6pne using aauty wet asow you puE aDnEN¢ JaN4D ala Jo PasodutoD seMINOD BLY Guna) auaidns 73209 pjog ALR JO UORISOdUOD ALN Seat BUM “6L souoyusoy WAKO aka uw sunco ysmuG Xn 0 UORDPSUAT AIA PUEDD OL,“ 18209 pod RU SU YsnG ALA JO UORDIpsUNE axa puesx@ OL $3) 2140.00 ‘5 pue 35809 PION ayy UL SUNOD YsRUE AiR JO uoRDIPsUNf au puede OL “a wopBupy RUEUSY ax SuNED USRHG so UORIAPSUN tA pUEdKO OLY _epaysygersa juno awiasdns 3S209 pIoD SEM AYM BL QUeUIPIO WNOD YBIH 3SeO2 PIE SUL *D 8809 plo Jo AoUeUIPIO WNOD auaidns BY. D. soueuplo wren (Wi) awaLéns UL CB) soueuipio ne5 (eweidns) 46H eu -V aysiqerse unos auraudns ase09 Plog au Sem SOUeUIpLO DRAM 4OPUN “LZ set “a oust 3) wer eet ¥ epausyqeyse-21 yn0 auraudng 3se0 Pion atp ‘SEM LOY “OL0, Under the re-etblshed Gold Coast Supreme Cou what was the composition of the Court of Appeal (])_ cet ystenans one oro pune sudges constituted a Court of Appeal 8 Cet yen and reso for pe ges canta CON appeal c. chit nae and rt meta our pus Sages cores 2 COE of Appeal 1, Chet Justonand five puisne Judges constiuted 2 Court of Appee! 1, Where did the Court of Appeal si? A Lagos: Monrovia © Kewardiaos Des. 182, Where was aDivisionat Court ofthe Supreme Court required to sit AA. The Southern and Northern Protecorates Mt? which the area of jurisdiction was divided Fe) The Cental Easter and western Provinces ito hich the area of jurisdiction ‘as dvided. che Central Provinces only 1p. None of the above page 25 0158asyoazatea syadon agenounar try posnoy pur pOUase= ue) peweey A404) pur] ployasea| AMO (& saquosap Auadoud eu "28 fe et pue Ayedoud eau (P ‘Avadoud leuosied pur Msadoud 1e0u ‘yeuosiad pue Aadosd yeuosiog (@ ‘ayes pue Ayodoud joo (© 5) yeuy “sensedond Jo souoGsve> VIEW! omy O1e 3424 “98 squaied Guawuns siy OL (0 sraumo wou 01 () vvaupuyp sty OL (4 sraquiow Awe AO OL (@ osiad peap e Jo saruadoud jo seysuen aun itm pause2uod 5] UorssaxoNs 30 me] UL “SB sour Uso) pu Wa uON “WISER eANED "HUEISY “a seouinoag waysen\ pue Wwayse ‘I2QUBD ‘HUeUSY “| scour worsoyn pur wisea 211008) sou es99 pur RUELEY "Y ‘9c8t Jo s2ueuIpAg ne (YBIH) eweudns ‘ain Aq) payeasr 1809 pIOD ALA JO suORDAPSuN{ JeB| TeDUAOM |B SEN +8 ca +9 eee eateeet parE cay esuonpipsunt [eB epunaid Auew soy qu] 35809 PIED ALA PAPINP 9487 J0 BOUEUIPAO NOD (YEIH) awiavdNS MLL ESssoierel (P xn ® wnensel sonal (@ 5) ajeway S1 04m ONES, ¥ "ES sooetay pur sasited (P sayqybuen pue sejqgeuenst sayqibuey pue sbunn a1aeron sopqBueaul pue sBunn enon (© _jayeyp 10) SoU JOWRO OM AND TE sajqsuea pue provsela (P sajai6uewu! pue sone © ‘sayqiGues pue SNE (@ ‘gjney> pue pioupald (© ce pue wy Asedoud pussy ave Aeuosied J° SAGA ‘gauiq euL 16 cond (P nos © an @ omy (2 sou a Kyqu0snd J Sos ues HOH "06 ssonbog 10 28700 (P anboq 20 402601) ‘foe8a} 10 ase (@ ssontaq 0 Ayeussnd (© aye ssn @ 9pun Ausodoudweucered 39.415 ¥ 6 fooba1 (P ssanbeg asioa (9) igeas pajjeo st Auadoud J201 40 w10 V "8894. The duty of transferring property from the deceased to a new ovmer falls on the Personal representation of the deceased when there isa valid will at the time of death, ‘The personal representative is called a (an) a) Testator Testa @esecutor d) Administrator 95. The person who makes a valid wil is called a (an) @) Testator or testatrix b) Executor or executrd: ©) Administrator or administratrix d) Executor or testator 96. The two laws which detail the rule of governing whom is entrusted to the estate of, a testator/testatrx are 7 Ps nes @ fet 360 and act 63 a amended by PNDC Law 113 b) Act 361 and Act 62 as amended by PNDC Law 113, ©) Act 362 and Act 64 as amended by PNDC Law 113, 4) Aet 360 and Act 64 as amended by PNDC Law 113 o7 dic year was the Ws ct passe? 2),1970 on ©) 1972 d) 1973 98, Which year was the Administration of Estates Act Passed? a) 1960 1961 ) 1962 4) 1963 Page 28 0f 58