Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Criminal Law Book 1 Articles 21 - 30 Philippine Law Reviewers
Criminal Law Book 1 Articles 21 - 30 Philippine Law Reviewers
JAN 24
Posted by Magz
Art. 21. Penalties that may be imposed. — No felony shall be punishable by any penalty not
prescribed by law prior to its commission.
Guarantees that no act of a citizen will be considered criminal unless the State has made it so by law
and provided a penalty
Except: When the penalty is favorable to the criminal.
Art. 22. Retroactive effect of penal laws. — Penal Laws shall have a retroactive effect insofar as they
favor the persons guilty of a felony, who is not a habitual criminal, as this term is defined in Rule 5 of
Article 62 of this Code, although at the time of the publication of such laws a final sentence has been
pronounced and the convict is serving the same.
a Makes criminal an act done before the passage of the law and which was innocent when done, and
punishes such an act.
b Aggravates the crime or makes it greater than it was when commi ed.
c Changes the punishment and inflicts a greater punishment than the law annexed to the crime when
commi ed.
d Alters the legal rules of evidence and authorizes conviction upon less or different testimony than
the law required at the time of the commission of the crime.
e Assuming to regulate civil rights and remedies only, in effect imposes penalty or deprivation of a
right for something which when done was lawful.
f Deprives a person accused of a crime some lawful protection to which he has become entitled, such
as the protection of a former conviction or acqui al or a proclamation of amnesty.
Bill of A ainder – a legislative act which inflicts punishment without trial. Its essence is the
substitution of a legislative for a judicial determination of guilt.
Effect of change of Penal Law
a With enactment of a penal law punishing the offense – the action is not dismissed. The penalty in
the new law if favorable to the accused.
b Without enactment of a penal law punishing the offense – the previous offense is obliterated and
the action is dismissed.
Art. 23. Effect of pardon by the offended party. — A pardon of the offended party does not extinguish
criminal action except as provided in Article 344 of this Code; but civil liability with regard to the
interest of the injured party is extinguished by his express waiver.
Even if injured party already pardoned the offender – fiscal can still prosecute. Not even considered a
ground for dismissal of the information. Exception: Art 344 – crimes of seduction, abduction, rape or
https://lawphilreviewer.wordpress.com/2012/01/24/criminal-law-book-1-articles-21-30-2/ 2/11
5/8/2021 Criminal Law Book 1 Articles 21 – 30 | Philippine Law Reviewers
Art. 24. Measures of prevention or safety which are nor considered penalties. — The following shall
not be considered as penalties:
1. The arrest and temporary detention of accused persons, as well as their detention by reason of
insanity or imbecility, or illness requiring their confinement in a hospital.
2. The commitment of a minor to any of the institutions mentioned in Article 80 and for the purposes
specified therein.
3. Suspension from the employment of public office during the trial or in order to institute
proceedings.
4. Fines and other corrective measures which, in the exercise of their administrative disciplinary
powers, superior officials may impose upon their subordinates.
5. Deprivation of rights and the reparations which the civil laws may establish in penal form.
Par 1 refers to the “accused persons” who are detained “by reason of insanity or imbecility” not an
insane or imbecile who has not been arrested for a crime.
They are not considered penalties because they are not imposed as a result of judicial proceedings.
Those in par 1, 3 and 4 are merely preventive measures before the conviction of offenders.
Commitment of a minor is not a penalty because it is not imposed by the court in a judgment. The
imposition of the sentence in such a case is suspended.
Fines in par 4 are not imposed by the court because otherwise, they constitute a penalty
https://lawphilreviewer.wordpress.com/2012/01/24/criminal-law-book-1-articles-21-30-2/ 3/11
5/8/2021 Criminal Law Book 1 Articles 21 – 30 | Philippine Law Reviewers
Art. 25. Penalties which may be imposed. — The penalties which may be imposed according to this
Code, and their different classes, are those included in the following:
Scale
PRINCIPAL PENALTIES
Capital punishment:
Death.
Afflictive penalties:
Reclusion perpetua,
Reclusion temporal,
Prision mayor.
Correctional penalties:
Prision correccional,
Arresto mayor,
Suspension,
Destierro.
Light penalties:
Arresto menor,
Public censure.
Fine, and
ACCESSORY PENALTIES
Suspension from public office, the right to vote and be voted for the profession or calling.
Civil interdiction,
https://lawphilreviewer.wordpress.com/2012/01/24/criminal-law-book-1-articles-21-30-2/ 4/11
5/8/2021 Criminal Law Book 1 Articles 21 – 30 | Philippine Law Reviewers
Indemnification,
Payment of costs.
Classification of penalties:
a Principal – art 25
a divisible – those that have fixed duration and are divisible into 3 periods
According to subject ma er
a corporal – death
e pecuniary – fine
According to gravity
a capital
b afflictive
c correccional
d light
Public censure is a penalty, and being such, is not proper in acqui al. But a competent court, while
acqui ing an accused may, with unquestionable propriety express its disapproval or reprehension of
those acts to avoid the impression that by acqui ing the accused it approves or admires his conduct.
Permanent and temporary absolute and permanent and temporary special disqualification and
suspension may be principal or accessory penalties because they are found in 2 general classes.
Art. 26. When afflictive, correctional, or light penalty. — A fine, whether imposed as a single of as an
alternative penalty, shall be considered an afflictive penalty, if it exceeds 6,000 pesos; a correctional
penalty, if it does not exceed 6,000 pesos but is not less than 200 pesos; and a light penalty if it less
than 200 pesos.
https://lawphilreviewer.wordpress.com/2012/01/24/criminal-law-book-1-articles-21-30-2/ 5/11
5/8/2021 Criminal Law Book 1 Articles 21 – 30 | Philippine Law Reviewers
Fines are imposed either as alternative (Art 144 punishing disturbance of proceedings with arresto
mayor or fine from 200 pesos to 1000 pesos) or single (fine of 200 to 6000 pesos)
Penalty cannot be imposed in the alternative since it’s the duty of the court to indicate the penalty
imposed definitely and positively. Thus, the court cannot sentence the guilty person in a manner as
such as “to pay fine of 1000 pesos, or to suffer an imprisonment of 2 years, and to pay the costs.”
If the fine imposed by the law for the felony is exactly 200 pesos, it is a light felony.
Fines:
Note: The classification applies if the fine is imposed as a single or alternative penalty. Hence, it does
not apply if the fine imposed together with another penalty.
Bond to keep the peace is by analogy:
Article 9 Article 26
Art. 27. Reclusion perpetua. — Any person sentenced to any of the perpetual penalties shall be
pardoned after undergoing the penalty for thirty years, unless such person by reason of his conduct
or some other serious cause shall be considered by the Chief Executive as unworthy of pardon.
Reclusion temporal. — The penalty of reclusion temporal shall be from twelve years and one day to
twenty years.
Prision mayor and temporary disqualification. — The duration of the penalties of prision mayor and
temporary disqualification shall be from six years and one day to twelve years, except when the
penalty of disqualification is imposed as an accessory penalty, in which case its duration shall be that
of the principal penalty.
Prision correccional, suspension, and destierro. — The duration of the penalties of prision
correccional, suspension and destierro shall be from six months and one day to six years, except when
suspension is imposed as an accessory penalty, in which case, its duration shall be that of the
principal penalty.
https://lawphilreviewer.wordpress.com/2012/01/24/criminal-law-book-1-articles-21-30-2/ 6/11
5/8/2021 Criminal Law Book 1 Articles 21 – 30 | Philippine Law Reviewers
Arresto mayor. — The duration of the penalty of arresto mayor shall be from one month and one day
to six months.
Arresto menor. — The duration of the penalty of arresto menor shall be from one day to thirty days.
Bond to keep the peace. — The bond to keep the peace shall be required to cover such period of time
as the court may determine.
3 fold rule: the maximum duration of the convict’s sentence shall not be more than 3 times the length
of time corresponding to the most severe of the penalties imposed upon him.
the maximum duration of the convict’s sentence shall in no case exceed 40 years
Temporary disqualification and suspension, when imposed as accessory penalties, have different
durations – they follow the duration of the principal penalty
Destierro is imposed in the following circumstances:
a serious physical injuries or death under exceptional circumstances (spouse finding other spouse in
pari delicto)
b failure to give bond for good behavior ( a person making threat may be required to give bond not to
molest the person threatened, if not destierro)
d in cases where the reduction of the penalty by one or more degrees results in destierro
Bond to keep the peace is not specifically provided as a penalty for any felony and therefore cannot
be imposed by the court. It is required in Art 284 and not to be given in cases involving other crimes.
Summary:
a Perpetual penalties – after 30 years, can be pardoned, except when he is unworthy of pardon by
reason of his conduct and some other serious cause, it won’t exceed 40 years.
c Prision Mayor and temporary disqualification – 6 yrs and 1 day to 12 yrs; disqualification if
accessory follows the duration of the principal penalty
d Prision Correccional, suspension and destierro – 6 mos and 1 day to 12 yrs; disqualification if
accessory follows the duration of the principal penalty
g Bond to keep the peace – the period during which the bond shall be effective is discretionary to the
court
https://lawphilreviewer.wordpress.com/2012/01/24/criminal-law-book-1-articles-21-30-2/ 7/11
5/8/2021 Criminal Law Book 1 Articles 21 – 30 | Philippine Law Reviewers
Art. 28. Computation of penalties. — If the offender shall be in prison, the term of the duration of the
temporary penalties shall be computed from the day on which the judgment of conviction shall have
become final.
If the offender be not in prison, the term of the duration of the penalty consisting of deprivation of
liberty shall be computed from the day that the offender is placed at the disposal of the judicial
authorities for the enforcement of the penalty. The duration of the other penalties shall be computed
only from the day on which the defendant commences to serve his sentence.
a When the offender is in prison – the duration of the temporary penalties (PAD, TAD, detention,
suspension) is from the day on which the judgment of conviction becomes final.
https://lawphilreviewer.wordpress.com/2012/01/24/criminal-law-book-1-articles-21-30-2/ 8/11
5/8/2021 Criminal Law Book 1 Articles 21 – 30 | Philippine Law Reviewers
b When the offender is not in prison – the duration of the penalty in deprivation of liberty is from the
day that the offender is placed at the disposal of judicial authorities for the enforcement of the penalty
c The duration of the other penalties – the duration is from the day on which the offender commences
to serve his sentence
Reason for rule (a) – because under Art 24, the arrest and temporary detention of the accused is not
considered a penalty
if in custody, the accused appealed, the service of the sentence should commence from the date of the
promulgation of the decision of the appellate court, not from the date of the judgment of the trial
court was promulgated.
service of one in prison begins only on the day the judgment of conviction becomes final.
In cases if temporary penalties, if the offender is under detention, as when undergoing preventive
imprisonment, rule (a) applies.
If not under detention (released on bail) rule (c) applies
Offender under preventive imprisonment, rule (c) applies not rule (a)
The offender is entitled to a deduction of full-time or 4/5 of the time of his detention.
Art. 29. Period of preventive imprisonment deducted from term of imprisonment. — Offenders who
have undergone preventive imprisonment shall be credited in the service of their sentence consisting
of deprivation of liberty, with the full time during which they have undergone preventive
imprisonment, if the detention prisoner agrees voluntarily in writing to abide by the same
disciplinary rules imposed upon convicted prisoners, except in the following cases:
1. When they are recidivists or have been convicted previously twice or more times of any crime; and
2. When upon being summoned for the execution of their sentence they have failed to surrender
voluntarily.
If the detention prisoner does not agree to abide by the same disciplinary rules imposed upon
convicted prisoners, he shall be credited in the service of his sentence with four-fifths of the time
during which he has undergone preventive imprisonment. (As amended by Republic Act 6127, June
17, 1970). cd i
Whenever an accused has undergone preventive imprisonment for a period equal to or more than the
possible maximum imprisonment of the offense charged to which he may be sentenced and his case
is not yet terminated, he shall be released immediately without prejudice to the continuation of the
trial thereof or the proceeding on appeal, if the same is under review. In case the maximum penalty to
which the accused may be sentenced is destierro, he shall be released after thirty (30) days of
preventive imprisonment. (As amended by E.O. No. 214, July 10, 1988).
a offense is non-bailable
the full time or 4/5 of the time during which the offenders have undergone preventive suspension
shall be deducted from the penalty imposed
preventive imprisonment must also be considered in perpetual penalties. Article does not make any
distinction between temporal and perpetual penalties.
https://lawphilreviewer.wordpress.com/2012/01/24/criminal-law-book-1-articles-21-30-2/ 9/11
5/8/2021 Criminal Law Book 1 Articles 21 – 30 | Philippine Law Reviewers
Art. 30. Effects of the penalties of perpetual or temporary absolute disqualification. — The penalties
of perpetual or temporary absolute disqualification for public office shall produce the following
effects:
1. The deprivation of the public offices and employments which the offender may have held even if
conferred by popular election.
2.The deprivation of the right to vote in any election for any popular office or to be elected to such
office.
3. The disqualification for the offices or public employments and for the exercise of any of the rights
mentioned.
4. The loss of all rights to retirement pay or other pension for any office formerly held.
The exclusion is a mere disqualification for protection and not for punishment – the withholding of a
privilege, not a denial of a right.
Perpetual absolute disqualification is effective during the lifetime of the convict and even after the
service of the sentence.
Temporary absolute disqualification is effective during the term of sentence and is removed after the
service of the same. Exception: (1) deprivation of the public office or employment; (2) loss of all rights
to retirement pay or other pension for any office formerly held.
Effects of Perpetual and temporary absolute disqualification:
https://lawphilreviewer.wordpress.com/2012/01/24/criminal-law-book-1-articles-21-30-2/ 10/11
5/8/2021 Criminal Law Book 1 Articles 21 – 30 | Philippine Law Reviewers
d All these effects last during the lifetime of the convict and even after the service of the sentence
except as regards paragraphs 2 and 3 of the above in connection with Temporary Absolute
Disqualification.
Reference:
About Magz
First of all, I am not a lawyer. I'm a graduate of AB Political Science and went to the College of Law but stopped
going to law school for some reasons. I'm a passionate teacher who has been teaching English to speakers of other
languages and a person who likes writing and blogging. I lost some important files and software when my
computer broke down so the reason I created this website is to preserve the notes, reviewers and digests I collected
when I was at the law school and at the same time, I want to help out law students who do not have enough time to
go and read books in the library.
View all posts by Magz »
Posted on January 24, 2012, in Criminal Law and tagged Criminal Law Book 1 Articles 21 - 30. Bookmark
the permalink. Leave a comment.
Leave a comment
Comments 0
Blog at WordPress.com.
https://lawphilreviewer.wordpress.com/2012/01/24/criminal-law-book-1-articles-21-30-2/ 11/11