Kya koe Education Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia Vicerrectoria Académica y de Investigacién Course: Testing and Evaluation in ELT Code: 518023 Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric - Phase 1 Assessment Context 1, Activity Description (yori Noort bora = Oana Type of activity: Individual Evaluation moment: Initial Highest score of the activity: 25 points The activity starts on: Monday, August | The activity ends on: Sunday, 22, 2022 September 4, 2022 With this activity, you are expected to achieve the following learning outcomes: Identify the various types of testing and evaluation in English as a foreign language through the analysis of different sources The activity consists of: Part 2. Questions & Answers Answer the questions and send them to the collaborative work forum. Do not send files, post them. What is Standardized assessment in education? What is the purpose of a standardized test? What are the types of standardized test? What are the norms for standardized tests? Establish the difference between formative assessment and summative assessment within the educational context. Reflection Based on your teacher-in-training experience reflect with your group in the forum on the following questions: 1Kya koe Education (yori Noort bora = Oana + What are the pedagogical strategies you are considering to use in this face-to face immersion practice? Include deep description of each strategy. + Explain some strategies you will use to help the students to improve their English level. + What steps are necessary to develop an evaluation? + What are the best times to apply an evaluation? + What types of evaluation do you know? What are the most recommendable for you? + What can determine how reliable the evaluation results are? For the development of the acti ity consider that: For the development of the activity consider that: In the Initial Information Environment, you must: + Check the agenda and interact in the web conferences schedule. In the Learning Environment, you must: "Socialize the activity in the forum titled: Discussion forum: Phase 1 - Assessment Context In the Evaluation Environment, you must: Upload the final document in the space Phase 1 - Assessment Context Evidences of individual work: The individual evidence to be submitted is A PDF document with = Questions & Answers + Reflections + References according to APA Standards Evidences of collaborative work: No collaborative evidence is required in this activity. 2. General Guidelines for the Development of Evidences to SubmitKya koe Education UNe2 (yori Noort bora = Oana For Individual evidences, consider the following: * Each student individually must submit the requested product in the environment indicated by the teacher. Before submitting the requested product, students should check that it meets all the requirements mentioned in this activity guide, Please keep in mind that all individual or collaborative written products must comply with the spelling rules and presentation conditions defined in this activity guide. Regarding the use of references, consider that the product of this activity must comply with APA style. In any case, make sure you comply with the rules and avoid academic plagiarism. You can review your written products using the Turnitin tool found in the virtual campus. Under the Academic Code of Conduct, the actions that infringe the academic order, among others, are the following: paragraph e) Plagiarism is to present as your own work all or part of a written report, task or document of invention carried out by another person. It also implies the use of citations or lack of references, or it includes citations where there is no match between these and the reference and paragraph f) To reproduce, or copy for profit, educational resources or results of research products, which have rights reserved for the University. (Acuerdo 029 - 13 de diciembre de 2013, articulo 99) The academic penalties students will face are: a) In case of academic fraud demonstrated in the academic work or evaluation, the score obtained will be zero (0.0) without any disciplinary measures being derived. b) In case of proven plagiarism in academic work of any nature, the score obtained will be zero (0.0), without any disciplinary measures being derived. 3. Evaluation Rubric TemplateKya koe Education (yori Noort First evaluation | |High level: The student answers each of the questions criterion: through his/her knowledge as a teacher in training, and educational context Question and Answers If your work is at this level, you can get between 10 points This criterion and 15 points represents 15 points of the total | Average level: The student partially answers each of the of 25 points of __| questions through his/her knowledge as a teacher in training, the activity. and educational context If your work is at this level, you can get between 8 points and 12 points Low level: The student doesn ‘t answer each of the questions through his/her knowledge as a teacher in training, and educational context, or did not send the final document. If your work is at this level, you can get between 1 points and 6 points High level: The student shows reflective thinking related to his/her teacher-in-training experience Second evaluation criterion: If your work is at this level, you can get between 7 points and 10 points Reflective thinking Average level: The student Partially shows reflective thinking This criterion related to his/her teacher-in-training experience in each of the represents 15 questions points of the total of 25 points of __| If your work is at this level, you can get between 4 points the activity. and 6 points Low level: The student shows poor reflective thinking in the questions related to his/her teacher-in-training experience, or didn’t send the final document. 4Kya koe Education and 4 points