We have free will as rational beings because we can assess among both possibilities or choose

to guide our course of action in one direction or another, which means that our deeds are
aimed directly toward achieving the edges or goods which individual desire and crave. Hence,
according to him; Thomas Aquinas, it avoided and acknowledged the vision of natural law as
component of a bigger discussion that his moral theory requires benefit of the entire, implying
that it is for everyone. He is a medieval thinker that's why because of that, he has a wide range
of vision and uses a lot of evaluation to seek the facts. Although his natural law has been
proffered and given to everyone, he will always be the one who has said the exact opposite of
what he had said, that's why he explores and navigates the presence of a natural law since he
believes he is skilled enough to assess and find the facts. I believe that not everyone has a
broad by someone with wide thinking like him; Thomas Aquinas, everybody has a different
outlook on life, and all have their own way of figuring out how to pursue something that is
already assumed to be good for them; everyone, what is required is to consider deeply about
what is in fact necessary for everyone. As a result, if he was ironic to his own work; natural law,
this could start causing any outcomes not only for individual concerns or specific problems but
as well as, in public life due to the wide availability by disobeying the natural law and only
seeing the correlation and causation.