JULY 2006/LAW 166/251/379

BUSINESS LAW (LAW 166/251/379) OBJECTIVE QUESTIONS APRIL 2004 1)A 6) D 11) D 16)C 21)B OCT 2004 1)B 6) D 11)B 16)B 21)C APR 2005 1) D 6)C 11) D 16) D OCT 2005 1)A 6)A 11) D 16)C APR 2006 1) D 6)B 11)A 16)A OCT 2006 1)D 6)D 11)D 16)C 2)A 7)A 12)C 17)D 3)B 8)B 13)A 18)C 4)C 9)D 14)B 19)B 5)A 10)D 15)D 20)A 2)A 7)A 12)B 17)B 3)C/D 8)A 13)C 18)A 4)C 9) D 14)B 19) D 5)A 10)A 15)A 20)C 2) D 7)B 12) D 17) D 3)C 8)C 13)C 18)A 4)B 9)C 14) D 19)C 5) D 10) D 15) D 20)B 2)C 7)B 12)C 17)A 3)C 8)A 13)C 18)A 4)C 9)D 14) D 19) D 5)B 10)B 15)B 20)C 2)B 7)A 12)C 17)C 22)A 3)A 8)B 13)C 18)A 23)B 4)B 9)A 14)A 19) C 24)C 5)A 10)C 15)C 20)B 25)A 2)B 7)B 12) D 17)C 22)B 3)C 8)A 13)C 18)C 23)B 4)B 9)C 14)C 19)A 24)C 5)A 10)C 15)A 20)C 25)C

- SHATRAH 06-

JULY 2006/LAW 166/251/379

OCTOBER 2006 QUESTION ONE (a) Issue Whether Farah can claim RM500 from RIni Law: Sec 2(a) CA S4(a) CA S2(b) CA CArlil v Caarbolic Smokeball R v Clarke Application: Since Farah did not know about the reward at he time of the contract she cannot claim for the reward as provided in the case of R v Clarke QUESTION ONE (b) Issue Whether Sameon Boopkstore and Hadley can get the money from Dali Law: S2 of Age of Majority Act S 11 of CA S 69 of CA Mohiri Bibee v Dhurmodas Ghose Tan Hee Juan Govt of Malaysia v Gurcharan Singh Aplication Sameon bookstore can claim because there was valid contract as it is for necessity, but for Hadley cannot claim because of luxury and the contract was void. QUESTION TWO COERCION Section 15 Effect of a contract under coercion section 19 Kesarmal v vallappa chettiar Chin nam bee dvlpmn FRAUD Section 17 Derry v peek Element of fraud false representation Representee relied on the statement made Explain section 19 Weber v brown MISREPRESENTATION

- SHATRAH 06-

JULY 2006/LAW 166/251/379

Section 18 Element of misrep Section 19 Tan chye chew v eastern mining QUESTION THREE Agency can be terminated by The act of parties: Mutual consent Unilateral revocation or termination by principal Unilateral renunciation by the agent The operation of law: Section 154 CA Performance of the contract Expiration of the period in the contract Death of eother agent or principal Insanity of the principal or agent Bankruptcy of the principal Agency unlawful QUESTION FIVE 1) separate legal entity salamon v salamon, lee v lee 2) right to sue and to be sued foss v harbottle 3) perpetual succession re noel tedman 4) may own property macaura v northern assurance 5) limited liability of members QUESTION SIX a) section 15 of HPA early completion, return the good b)section 11 of HPA removal of goods notice to the owner reason to remove

- SHATRAH 06-

JULY 2006/LAW 166/251/379

c) sect 4B HPA complete and sign failure agreement void owner guilty of an offence

OCTOBER 2006 QUESTION ONE (a) Issue Whether Farah can claim RM500 from RIni Law: Sec 2(a) CA S4(a) CA S2(b) CA CArlil v Caarbolic Smokeball R v Clarke Application: Since Farah did not know about the reward at he time of the contract she cannot claim for the reward as provided in the case of R v Clarke QUESTION ONE (b) Issue Whether Sameon Boopkstore and Hadley can get the money from Dali Law: S2 of Age of Majority Act S 11 of CA S 69 of CA Mohiri Bibee v Dhurmodas Ghose Tan Hee Juan Govt of Malaysia v Gurcharan Singh Aplication Sameon bookstore can claim because there was valid contract as it is for necessity, but for Hadley cannot claim because of luxury and the contract was void. QUESTION TWO COERCION Section 15 Effect of a contract under coercion section 19 Kesarmal v vallappa chettiar Chin nam bee dvlpmn FRAUD

- SHATRAH 06-

JULY 2006/LAW 166/251/379

Section 17 Derry v peek Element of fraud false representation Representee relied on the statement made Explain section 19 Weber v brown MISREPRESENTATION Section 18 Element of misrep Section 19 Tan chye chew v eastern mining QUESTION THREE Agency can be terminated by The act of parties: Mutual consent Unilateral revocation or termination by principal Unilateral renunciation by the agent The operation of law: Section 154 CA Performance of the contract Expiration of the period in the contract Death of eother agent or principal Insanity of the principal or agent Bankruptcy of the principal Agency unlawful QUESTION FIVE 6) separate legal entity salamon v salamon, lee v lee 7) right to sue and to be sued foss v harbottle 8) perpetual succession re noel tedman 9) may own property macaura v northern assurance 10) limited liability of members QUESTION SIX

- SHATRAH 06-

JULY 2006/LAW 166/251/379

a) section 15 of HPA early completion, return the good b)section 11 of HPA removal of goods notice to the owner reason to remove c) sect 4B HPA complete and sign failure agreement void owner guilty of an offence

- SHATRAH 06-