Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Introduction
In a world of two goods, X and Y.. Consider the effects when price of X decreases.
decrease
• If the individual's Nominal income (or money income) does not change, the fall in
price of X means that there is a rise in his/her Real income.
• The question
uestion we would like to ask is: How will the effects of the change in the
price of X be distributed
stributed between the two goods?
2. Real income
• Real income is not in terms of Dollar amount, there are two definitions of Real
Income.
• The other is measured in terms of the individual’s ability to buy the initial bundle
(this is Slutskian definition of real income).
The combination of these two effects will determine the individual’s new choice
of consumption.
3. Hicksian Definition
• This can be achieved by finding the point of tangency of the new relative price
with the initial indifference curve.
y
I0
Py0
CH B
S.E.H I.E.H
U1
U0
x0 xC I0 x1 I0 x
Px0 Px1
• Given Hicksian definition of real income at both A and C, the individual achieves
the same level of real income.
• The move from C to B is called the income effect. This can be brought about by a
parallel shift of the Hicksian imaginary budget line.
• If price remains at the same level, such an increase in utility can only be brought
about by an increase of Nominal Income.
• The movement from point A to point B is called the Total Effect following the
change in price of X. It is the sum of the Substitution Effect and the Income
Effect.
Exercise:
In a world of two goods x and y, examine both Hicksian Substitution and Income
effect, when price of X increases while price of Y remains at the same level. Is there
an inverse relationship between price and substitution effect?
I0
Py0
U0
I0 x I0 x
0
Px1 Px0
y
I0 700
=
Py0 5
80 A
50 C
U0
50 I0 700 I0 700 x
30 = =
Px0 10 Px1 5
Initially, the individual chooses point A. His income is 700 and A is on the old budget
line. This can be seen as
When the price of x falls to 5, substitution effect (based on Hicksian definition of real
income) leads the individual to choose a bundle of 50 units of x and 50 units of y.
This is point C on the Hick’s hypothetical budget line. The income necessary to
achieve the choice is 500.
This means that at the new price of x, the individual would need only 500 to be
indifferent between his new choice at C and the original choice at A.
His actual income is 700. If the government taxes 190 away from the individual, the
individual is better off.
• The measure for real income is in terms of the individual’s ability to buy the
initial bundle.
I0
Py0
S.E.S I.E.S
U1
U0
x0 xC I0 x I0 x
1
Px0 Px1
• However, point A does not maximize the individual’s utility at the new price. The
individual will hence chose a different point, point C, that maximizes his/her
utility.
• The move from C to B is called the income effect. This can be brought about by a
parallel shift of the Slutsktian imaginary budget line.
• If price remains at the same level, such an increase in utility can only be brought
about by an increase of Nominal Income.
• The movement from point A to point B is called the Total Effect following the
change in price of X. It is the sum of the Substitution Effect and the Income
Effect.
Exercise:
In a world of two goods X and Y, examine both Slutsky’s Substitution and Income
effect, when price of X increases, while price of Y is held constant. Is there an inverse
relationship between price and substitution effect?
I0
Py0
U0
I0 x I0 x
0
Px1 Px0
• When a good is a normal good, the income effect is positive. When the good is
an inferior good, the income effect is negative. The above definition has
implications on the individual’s demand.
• For instance, when the individual has higher nominal income, would he or she go
on overseas holiday more often? Would he or she consume more or less of bread?
• The answer to the above depends on the nature of the good. More specifically,
1) Normal Good: if income increases, the quantity demanded for the good
increases; if income decreases, the quantity demanded for the good decreases.
2) Inferior Good: if income increases, the quantity demanded for the good
decreases; if income decreases, the quantity demanded for the good increases.
y x Inferior x Normal
I1
Py0
I0
BI
Py0
A BN
Px0
U0
Py0
x1 x0 x1 I0 I1 x
Px0 Px0
Exercise:
Find the new optimal choice following a decrease in individual’s income if X is a
normal good. What if X is an inferior good?
y
I0
Py0
I0 > I1
Px0
U0
Py0
x0 I0 x
Px0
I0 X Inferior X Normal
Py0
CH
S.E.H
U0
x0 xC I0 I0 x
Px0 Px1
• B can be anywhere on the new budget line where utility is higher. However, there
are now two main possibilities.
1) The individual moves to the right of point C means that as income increases
the individual will want to consume more of X. Here, we call X is a Normal
Good.
• But what are the Giffen Goods? To qualify as a Giffen good, the choice of
individual must reveal two characteristics.
• Following this definition, if the good is Giffen, then point B is on the left of A.
The fall in price of X results in a fall in the quantity demanded from the
individual.
I0
Py0
U0
I0 x I0 x
0
Px1 Px0
I0 X Inferior X Normal
Py0 BG
BI
A
BN
CH
I .E.G
I .E.I
S.E. I.E.N
U0
x0 xC I0 I0 x
Px0 Px1
• The demand for a normal good will tend to be flatter than the demand for an
inferior good.
• The demand for an inferior good where the net-substitution effect is more
dominant is still downward sloping
• The demand for an inferior good where the income effects is more dominant (a
Giffen good) is upward sloping.
• The demand curve commonly observed tend to be downward slopping. That is,
the quantity demanded rises as the price of the product falls. This downward
slopping property of the demand curve is often called the Law of Demand.
y
I1 X Normal
PY0
I0
Py0
BN
A
U0
x0 xC I0 I1 x
Px0 Px0
2. Show that an increase in individual income shifts the demand curve to left if the
good is an inferior good.
y
I1 X Inferior
PY0
I0 BI
Py0
U0
x0 xC I0 I1 x
Px0 Px0
I0
Py0
CH
S.E.H U0
x0 I0 I0 x
xCH
Px0 Px1
2) In one graph, examine both Hick’s and Slutsky’s definitions of Substitution effect
and Income effect when Px decreases and X is a Inferior good. Compare the size
of Substitution and Income effects under the two different definitions.
I0
Py0
CH
S.E.H U0
x0 I0 I0 x
xCH
Px0 Px1
I0
Py0
CH
U0
S.E.H
I0 x I0 x
xCH 0
Px1 Px0
4) In one graph, examine both Hick’s and Slutsky’s definitions of Substitution effect
and Income effect when Px increases and X is a Inferior good. Compare the size of
Substitution and Income effects under the two different definitions.
I0
Py0
CH
U0
S.E.H
I0 x I0 x
xCH 0
Px1 Px0
• In the world of two goods, whenever we make decisions about the choice of one
good we are also deciding the choice of the other good. That is, the demands for
the two goods are interrelated.
• The interrelationship between the two goods is based on whether the two goods
are complement or gross substitute.
• Consider again the fall in the price of X, let us see what happens to the quantity
demanded of Y.
I0
Py0
U0
x0 x1 I0 I0 x
Px0 Px1
1) In the case where the consumption of Y increases when the price of X falls we say
that X and Y are complements.
• It is so because a fall in the price of X suggests that people will buy more of X.
• For example, as the price of coffee falls, people tend to drink more coffee and
consume more sugar at the same time.
2) In the case where the consumption of Y falls with the fall in the price of X we
say that X and Y are gross substitutes. (We use 'gross' to distinguish it from the
substitution which we discussed before)
• A fall in the price of X suggests that we will consume more of (X is now cheaper).
• For instance, when the price of coffee decreases, people will tend to drink more
coffee and drink less tea instead. Mathematically, we thus have:
∂y d
y
ε xy = > 0 if X and Y are Gross Substitute(e.g., coffee and tea).
∂px
px
d
∂y
y
ε xy = < 0 if X and Y are Complements(e.g., entertainment and food).
∂px
px
Exercise:
1) Establish point B following an increase in price of X when X and Y are
complement. What if X and Y are gross substitute?
I0
Py0
A
y0
U0
x0 I0 I0 x
Px1 Px0
I0
Py0
U0
x0 x1 I0 I0 x
Px0 Px1
3) If good X and Y are gross-substitute, what would happened to the demand curve
for good Y if price of X falls?
I0
Py0
A
y0
U1
U0
x0 I0 I0 x
x1
Px0 Px1
y
I0
Py0
y0 A
U0
y E
y0 ' A’
U0 '
x0 x0 ' I0 x
x
Px0
• With income of I 0 , the individual can choose a point like A or A’ on the budget
line that maximizes his/her utility.
• Suppose price of X decreases, the individual’s new budget line would rotate point
E and becomes flatter.
• If the individual’s initial choice of X is more than x and X is normal, the demand
for X can only be downward slopping.
I1
Py0
y E
A
y0
C
BN
U1 Note:
U0
x0 I0 N I1 x
x x1
Px0 Px1
• If the individual’s initial choice of X is less than x and X is normal, the demand
for X can either be downward slopping or upward slopping.
y
I0 X Normal X Inferior
Py0
y0 A
I1
Py0 BN
C
N
B
U0
E
y
Note:
I0 I1 x
x1N x0 x1N x
Px0 Px1
• The answer for the above question depends on the degree of Demand Price
Elasticity for good X. Consider the following demand schedule for good X.
Px0 x0 = α + β ; Px1 x1 = β + γ
Px0 x0 > Px1 x1 ⇒ α + β > β + γ ⇒ α > γ
Px
α = dP × x; γ = dx × P
A
Px0
dP α B
Px1
β γ
Dx
x0 x1 x
dx
• At point A, the total spending on X is: Px0 x0 . This is also the firms' revenue.
• If the price of X falls to Px1 and the quantity demanded increased to x1. We are at
point B.
• Graphically, we can say that the total spending at point A is α + β and the total
spending at point B is β + γ .
• If revenue at A is greater than that of B, we say that when price decreases, the
consumer spends less on good X (or firm’s revenue from selling X decreases).
Graphically, this is equivalent to
α + β > β +γ or α >γ
• α is the area which depicts the loss of revenue on previous sales (or, from the
point of view of the consumer, the savings on previous purchases). Therefore, we
can write
• γ represents the gains on the new sales (or the extra spending on the added
consumption). Hence,
γ = dx ⋅ p
• If α > γ , then
dP × x > dx × P
dx × P
⇔ 1>
dP × x
dx P dx / x
⇔ × = = η <1
dP x dp / p
dx / x
• Defining demand price elasticity of good X as η = , price elasticity thus
dp / p
shows the relationship between the proportional change in quantity over the
proportional change in price.
• Demand price elasticity thus measures the percentage change in the quantity of a
good demanded that results from a 1 percent change in price.
• When η < 1, the proportional change in quantity (dx/x) is smaller than the
proportional change in price (dp/p).
Px0 A
α
Px1 B
β γ
Dx
x0 x1 x
A
Px0
α B
Px1
Dx
β γ
x0 x1 x
Exercise: Find the demand price elasticity for the following demand curves?
Px Px
Dx
Dx
x x
Px
A
Px0
Px1 B
Dx
x0 x1 x
dx p
• η = is the product of the inverse of the slope of the demand schedule and
dp x
the slope of the ray from the origin1. That is,
p 1
η =
x Slope of Demand Curve
• The slope of the demand curve at A and at B is exactly the same, ie., (dx/dp)A =
(dx/dp)B
• However, the rays from the origin to point A and B are different. (P/x)A > (P/x)B
A B
dx p dx p A B
• Therefore: × > × ⇔ η >η
dP x dP x
• However, it is possible that all points on the same demand curve have the same
demand price elasticity if the demand curve is nonlinear. This class of demand
curve is called constant demand price elasticity demand curve.
Exercise:
What do you think a constant demand price elasticity demand curve will look like?
1
This way of finding demand price elasticity is called point-slope method.
1. "Under Slutsky's definition of 'real income' the income effect is always smaller
than under the Hicksian definition of real income". True or false, explain.
2. When the income is given in kind, it is always possible for the demand for any of
the goods to be upward slopping even when the good is a normal good. T/F,
explain.
3. In a world of two goods, X and Y, a fall in the price of X implies that good X
must be an Inferior good if the price elasticity of demand for X is equal to unity.
True or false? Explain.
5. When the slope of the demand schedule (dp/dx) is (-1/2) and the price elasticity of
demand is (-1/2), the quantity demanded of the good must be twice the value of its
price. True or false, explain.
6. When demand function is linear, the demand curve is a straight line. Why is it true
that a flatter liner demand must come with a higher demand price elasticity than a
steeper demand?
p 1
Hint: η =
x Slope of Demand Curve