Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bista, K., & Gaulee U. (2018). Re-envisioning community colleges in Nepal: Preparing all students for
success. In R. L. Raby, & E. J. Valeau (eds.), Handbook of comparative studies on community colleges
and global counterparts (pp. 161-176). New York, NY: Springer.
Contents
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162
Higher Educational Reform Policies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162
History of Postsecondary Education in Nepal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164
Current Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165
Student Enrollment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166
Funding and Oversight . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168
Technical and Vocational Education (TVE) in Nepal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169
Need to Create a Vision for a New Nepalese Community College . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169
Challenges for a New Nepalese Community College Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173
Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174
Abstract
This chapter presents an overview of Nepalese higher education and envisions an
integrated system that mirrors the framework and mission of US style community
colleges. It also highlights a policy discussion with higher education leaders from
Nepal regarding the creation of alternative models of higher education that can be
based on existing community-based colleges. The discussion illustrates how the
rapid expansions in higher education in Nepal is demanding the creation of new
K. Bista (*)
School of Education and Urban Studies, Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD, USA
e-mail: krishna.bista@morgan.edu
U. Gaulee
Community College Leadership Doctoral Program at Morgan State University, Morgan State
University, Baltimore, MD, USA
e-mail: uttam.gaulee@morgan.edu
policies and the possibility of even creating a new system that can accommodate
the increasing number of students wanting access to higher education every year.
Keywords
Community college · Higher education · Nepal · Student success
Introduction
In recent years, the government of Nepal has been working on refining the higher
education policy to guide the strategic planning of the higher education system.
These discussions are being made in order to address the need for economic and
workforce development, college effectiveness, governance, and leadership roles and
introducing college credit transfer and semester system. In November, 2011, a
conference was held in Kathmandu in which the National Planning Commission
and University Grants Commission collaborated with the United Nations Educa-
tional, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and the World Bank to
design a policy framework in order to capitalize on Nepal’s achievements within
the nation’s short history of higher education (first University opened in 1959). The
framework emphasized that the war-torn country’s higher education policies have
not been brought up to date due to long-standing political deadlocks that have led to
extreme complexities and fluidity in the political system. Finally, the framework
acknowledged that the rapid expansions in higher education urgently demanded new
policies and the possibility of even creating a new system that can accommodate the
increasing number of students wanting access to higher education every year.
Reform of higher education has been a high priority for Nepal to help expand access
and to enhance the quality of higher education. The World Bank is playing a major
role in assisting Nepal to reform higher education. First, the World Bank’s Country
Assistance Strategy (2004–2007) supported Nepal’s poverty reduction strategy. This
strategy was based on four pillars: broad-based economic growth, social sector
development, social inclusion, and good governance. The higher education sector
played a critical role in supporting the first two pillars, of broad-based economic
growth and social sector development. One result was implementation of the first
Higher Education Project (HEP) which decentralized campuses in Tribhuvan Uni-
versity (TU). These actions improved financial sustainability and quality through the
Engineering Education Project. The World Bank’s Second Higher Education Project
(SHEP) had several aims to improve Higher Education. These goals were to enhance
access of higher education for marginalized populations, to enhance the quality and
relevance of higher education, to develop new research through a set of incentives
for promoting effective management, and to gain financial sustainability of academic
institutions (The World Bank 2014).
11 Reenvisioning Community Colleges in Nepal: Preparing All Students for. . . 163
The HERP framework has laid out institutional arrangements for the project
implementation by applying key performance indicators to measure success. The
faculty and students of the universities, as well as the affiliated community cam-
puses, are among the beneficiaries of the project (UGC 2015).
Nepal’s current, postconflict emphasis is on poverty alleviation, creation of jobs,
and strengthening the newly achieved democracy through social harmony. Although
significant progress has been made toward providing basic education, higher edu-
cation is still a distant dream for a staggering majority of qualified youth. Nepalese
higher education gross enrolment ratio of 17.11% is one of the lowest in South Asia
(The World Bank 2014). At the thirteenth South Asian Association for Regional
Cooperation (SAARC) Summit held in Dhaka in November 2005, the leaders of
these South Asian nations noted the achievements of the Member States during
recent years in primary education and stressed in order to meet the challenges of all
seven member countries, they must make important strides in the areas of science,
technology, and higher education. As described in the World Bank’s 2000 report
“Higher Education in Developing Countries: Peril and Promise,” Nepal is no
exception to many other developing countries, with a dual challenge of expanding
their higher education system and improving quality, all within continuing budgetary
constraints.
According to the World Bank (2015), there are over 28.51 million people living in
Nepal, with a 65.9% literacy rate, and classified by gender literacy rates are male
75.1% and female 57.4%. Nepalese higher education system, based on British
educational system, is highly traditional, without much focus on workforce market
or the empowerment of the disadvantaged and the underprivileged people. Tradi-
tional college degrees are either a three-year bachelor’s degree or a 4-year degree, in
all disciplines. Current Nepalese education has failed to offer appropriate content
164 K. Bista and U. Gaulee
externally controlled by the affiliated university (in most cases Tribhuvan Univer-
sity). In addition, the terms colleges and campuses are synonymous in Nepal because
all colleges are affiliated with a university for examination and degree granting
purpose and while they are all satellite campuses, some like to call themselves
colleges. Due to lack of an accreditation system, an independent degree-granting
“college” did not exist.
By 1965, there were five public colleges with a total enrolment of 5,000 and 51
community colleges with a total enrolment of 10,000 students. In 1971, all commu-
nity colleges were nationalized and became part of Tribhuvan University (TU).
During the 2014/2015 academic year, there were over 384,499 students enrolled in
Tribhuvan University academic programs; one third of the total students were from
60 constituent campuses and central departments, the other two third were from 1063
affiliated public colleges and/or community colleges (Tribhuvan University 2016). A
constituent campus is one owned by the university itself while public or community
colleges are considered to be affiliated in that they pay an affiliation fee to the
university (somehow like a franchise). Currently, there are nine universities that offer
a wide range of programs in natural sciences, social sciences, medical sciences,
business and computer sciences, education, and other technical fields. The funding to
all universities is channeled through the University Grants Commission (UGC) with
the exception of B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, which receives grants
from the Ministry of Health. It is important to note that the Nepal community
colleges are not an integral part of the university, but nonetheless must follow the
university syllabus, examination, and degree programs.
Current Structure
The Nepal higher education system includes four institutional forms. There are
nine universities. Only one university, Kathmandu University, is private. How-
ever, it is important to note that no university is 100% public or private. Some
public universities rely on varying degrees of private funds whereas the private
university also receives government grants. The constituent campuses are an
integral part of their respective universities. As noted previously, these institu-
tions can be called: campuses or colleges. Constituent campuses are large centers
and are located in main cities of the country. All institutions that are non-
constituent campuses are called affiliated campuses. Affiliated campuses are
located throughout the country and are all affiliated with a specific university.
The affiliated campus follows the same admission requirement, curriculum, and
examination as the university to which they are affiliated to. There are two types
of nonaffiliated colleges: (a) Public colleges: These are community funded and,
therefore, are sometimes referred to as community colleges; (b) Private colleges,
although are privately funded, otherwise operate in the same ways as do com-
munity colleges. In addition, there are also International Colleges in Nepal.
166 K. Bista and U. Gaulee
International Colleges are located usually in the capital and are a branch of an
international university. They are funded from the international university and
use their enrollment, curriculum, and examination structure. Finally, there are
institutions that offer Technical Education and Vocational Training (TEVT) at the
high school and posthigh school level. Most of the TEVT institutions are not
considered to be part of the higher education system.
According to the Ministry of Education (2015), there were 1,369 higher educa-
tion campuses in Nepal. Out of these campuses, 98 (7.2%) are constituent campuses
of universities, 839 (61.3%) are private, and 432 (31.5%) are community college
campuses. In recent years, many private campuses have been established with
foreign university affiliations. Tribhuvan University still has the largest share
(83.8%) of the total higher education enrollment. The share of remaining universities
and medical academies is less than 15% and below 1%, respectively. The enrolment
proportion in terms of field of study is very high in the general programs (86.33% of
the total) and low in technical programs (13.66%). Table 1 illustrates the status of
higher education institutions.
Student Enrollment
Even though private colleges (many of which are affiliated with international
universities) outnumber community colleges (i.e., satellite campuses of existing
Nepal universities), a majority of students still attend public or community colleges
and to constituent campuses. Enrollment wise, the share of community campuses is
32.8% while the share of constituent campuses is 31.4% and that of private cam-
puses is 35.8%. Looking at the level of degree enrolment distribution, the vast
number of students (82.52%) is at bachelor’s level followed by 17.4% at the
master’s level. These figures for M.Phil. and Ph.D. are less than 1%. Enrolments
in education, management, and humanities are 34%, 30.5%, and 20.02%, respec-
tively. For engineering, medicine, science, and technology, this value is 5%, 4.5%,
and 4.2%, respectively. The forestry, agriculture, Ayurveda, and Sanskrit faculties
have below 1% students in each (UGC 2012). Humanities and social sciences have
been the most popular programs in Nepal (Table 2).
However, management and education are growing fields. There could be many
reasons including accessibility and affordability, but obviously, humanities have low
job prospects. Hence, the number has continued to decline. Table 3 illustrates the
UGC-affiliated community colleges.
Students in public and community colleges, similar to the university, take college
courses during morning or evening shifts. Most Nepalese undergraduate students are
full-time students and may not work elsewhere while studying. As a cultural norm,
parents pay the cost of education for their children and follow the wishes of parents.
Sometimes college students have little motivation or no interest in pursuing a
traditional college degree because of the growing number of unemployed graduates
(Khaniya 2007). There are many cases where students have dropped the programs or
changed their majors frequently.
11
Affiliated campuses do not receive public funding, but universities are still respon-
sible for supervision of their academic programs and examinations. In addition to
public and private, there are some campuses which are funded and managed by the
communities. Community colleges receive very small amount of financial support
for capital costs from the government through the University Grants Commission.
Since there is no accrediting body so far, degree-granting power only emanates from
the government – the legislature to be precise. Each of universities in Nepal is
established by an act passed from the national legislature. This makes colleges
follow the “academic” subjects prescribed by the university that they are affiliated
with. As a result, colleges lack engagement with community or industry.
The Council for Technical Education and Vocational Training (CTEVT) constituted
in 1989 is an autonomous body of technical and vocational education and training in
Nepal. It is mainly involved in policy formulation, quality control, and preparation of
competency-based curriculum, developing skill standards of various occupations,
conducting research studies, and training assessment. CTEVT offers proficiency
(high school equivalent) and short-cycle diploma level (posthigh school degrees),
technical school certificates, and short-term vocational and skill training. CTEVT
programs range from 39 h to 1500 h. Students with high school certificate (grade 10)
can complete the technical education degree in 15 months and those who come
without high school diploma can take a minimum of 29 months.
CTEVT courses are offered in the field of agriculture, engineering, health, office
management, social mobilization, and tourism. Table 4 shows some of the courses
offered. CTEVT’s higher level courses, also known as Certificate/Diploma, require
at least 3 years to complete, after posthigh school degree. Most of the students find
jobs or can generate income by working on their own because these programs are
designed to address community need. However, a direct business partnership model
with the educational institution does not exist.
While CTEVT is an extended part of the secondary construct, because it has a
resemblance with the vocational and technical mission of US or Canada community
college, it may be considered to have similarities to a community college global
counterpart (CETVT 2016), especially as many are being upgraded to serve the
postsecondary market.
As per the University Grants Commission, there are 343 community colleges
(38.2%) of all higher education campuses in the country (UGC 2012). As previously
mentioned, community colleges are affiliated with existing universities and all of
them offer bachelors and master degrees conferred by that university. Most of these
community colleges tend to operate like “ivory towers” in which the central
170 K. Bista and U. Gaulee
university controls the curriculum and examinations. Credentials are seen to be more
important than skills in these community-based colleges. As such, the framework
and curriculum of these programs are different from the US community colleges in
terms of structure, types of programs, entry requirements, community partnership,
and collaboration, and autonomy of the colleges.
There are currently no colleges in Nepal that offer a US 2 year of college degree
(Associate Degree) for students after completion of high school (grades 11 and 12).
There is also no structure in which a student can attend a college and then transfer
completed academic work to a university. Moreover, the existing Nepalese commu-
nity college programs and courses do not suggest there are community colleges that
help meet the workforce needs of the local communities. As such, the existing Nepal
community colleges cannot be considered to be a global counterpart as identified in
this book.
However, there are two characteristics of the community colleges in Nepal that
share characteristics with US community colleges. Noteworthy is that the University
Grants Commission of Nepal (2016) listed 11 institutions as community campuses
affiliated with Tribhuvan University as participating in the Secondary Higher Edu-
cation Project (SHEP). The SHEP project aims to (a) enhance quality and relevance
of higher education and research through a set of incentives for promoting effective
management and financial sustainability of academic institutions; and (b) improved
access for academically qualified underprivileged students, including girls, dalits,
and educationally disadvantaged janjatis to higher education through financial
assistance and enhanced capacity of higher secondary schools (World Bank 2014).
The nontraditional student outreach of existing community colleges of Nepal and the
location outside of major cities share commonalities with US community colleges.
There is also acknowledgement of the role that a US-style community college
could play in reforming Nepal higher education. Nagasundaram and Deosthale
11 Reenvisioning Community Colleges in Nepal: Preparing All Students for. . . 171
they have to admit too many students. They cannot focus on quality education and
scholarship due to a growing pressure of higher education access. A new system of
community college could therefore address the issues of access, as well as employ-
ability while allowing the university system to be “selective” as they would like to be
and also focus their attention more on research. During one of the coauthor’s visit to
Nepal in the summer of 2015, numerous higher education leaders talked about new
options for higher education. A new community college model could support these
ideas.
Although some vocational and technical colleges (VET) offer a wide range of
programs to help students and communities in Nepal, there are some clear distinc-
tions that remove them from the university sector. First, Nepalese vocational and
technical colleges are structured in such a way that they do not give students a
pathway to university education. Secondly, existing curricula are different as the
Nepal CTVET is limited, less practical, and institutions have failed to offer skills and
knowledge to meet the knowledge economy demand of the Nepalese labor market.
There are also no bridge courses or 2-year associate degree programs for students to
ensure employability and competency of individual trained, life skills, and commu-
nication in English.
One of the major challenges in adopting the US Community college model
could be establishing a system of trust so that individual colleges receive autonomy
to conduct their own admissions, curriculum, examinations, issue certificates and
diplomas, partner with local communities, and recruit teachers and students. The
flexibility by becoming an autonomous entity could result in developing a stronger
collaboration between the government and the community. Valeau (2013) believed
that the community college model is “one of the most widely adopted forms of
education world-wide and portends to be one of the systems of choice for
reforming education” (p. 28). To maximize this potential opportunity, the existing
Nepalese higher education system can adopt such a shift to bring a reform in
academia. One option is to take the case of Indira Gandhi National Open Univer-
sity, on how a university established more than 540 community colleges in India,
loosely based on the US model. Since Nepal and India share similar social,
cultural, and educational characteristics, this could be an example of the emer-
gence of community college as a positive change agent for Nepal. However, as
Gross (2017a, b) noted, the concept of community college has yet to obtain full
recognition in the Indian higher education system and hence community colleges
are “in danger of falling victim to the fickle winds of political and economic
change” (para. 30). Tracing more than two decades of community college devel-
opment initiative in India, Gross (2017b) argued that the future of community
college would depend on the “collective action of many” (p. 14). Apparently,
Nepal would require strong political commitment backed up by a concerted effort
from the higher education leaders to transform the system.
174 K. Bista and U. Gaulee
Conclusion
References
Alphonse, Xavier. 2013. The Indian community college system: Inspiration from community
colleges in the United States. In The U.S. community college model: Potential for applications
in India, ed. N. Jha, 17–22. New York: Institute of International Education.
Bista, Krishna. 2011. Learning-centered community colleges and ESL program. The Southeast
Asian Journal of English Language Studies 17(1): 113–121.
Brown, J. Noah. 2012. First in the world: Community colleges and America's future. New York:
Rowman & Littlefield.
Central Bureau of Statistics of Nepal. 2016. Government of Nepal. Retrieved from http://cbs.gov.
np/image/data/2016/Nepal%20in%20Figures%202015.pdf.
CTEVT. 2016. CTEVT fact sheet. Sanothimi: Research and Information Division.
11 Reenvisioning Community Colleges in Nepal: Preparing All Students for. . . 175
Gaulee, Uttam. 2014. Higher education in Nepal: Opportunities obscured by internal challenges. In
English language teaching in the twenty first century, ed. T. Karunakaran. Colombo: Kumaran
Book House.
Gross, Jillian L. 2017a. Community colleges in India. In International handbook on comparative
studies on community colleges and global counterparts, ed. Rosalind Latiner Raby and Edward
J. Valeau. Dordrecht: Springer.
Gross, Jillian L. 2017b. Community colleges in the Indian context. In New directions for colleges,
vol. 177. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Harris, Gardiner. 2014. In Nepal, a better life with a steep price. The New York Times. Retrieved
from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/15/world/asia/in-nepal-a-better-life-with-a-steep-price.
html?_r=1.
Hartenstine, Mary Beth. 2013. The U.S. community college as a model for global Higher education
system. In The U.S. community college model: Potential for applications in India, ed. N. Jha,
8–13. New York: Institute of International Education.
Khaniya, Tirtha R. 2007. New horizons in education in Nepal. Kathmandu: Kishor Kaniya Office
Support Service Center.
Mellow, Gail O., and Cynthia Heelan. 2014. Minding the dream: The process, and practice of the
American community college. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
Ministry of Education. 2015. Nepal education in figures: At-a-glance. Government of Nepal,
Ministry of Education. Singhadurbar. Accessed March 8, 2017 from: http://www.moe.gov.np/
article/520/nepal-education-in-figures-2015.html.
Nagasundaram, Murli, and Duleep Deosthale. 2013. Community colleges and socio-economic
growth in India. The U.S. community college as a model for global higher education system.
In The U.S. community college model: Potential for applications in India, ed. N. Jha, 23–26.
New York: Institute of International Education.
Panwar, B.S. 2013. The U.S. community college as a model for global higher education system. In
The U.S. community college model: Potential for applications in India, ed. N. Jha, 14–16. New
York: Institute of International Education.
Raby, Rosalind L., and Edward J. Valeau, eds. 2009. Community college models: Globalization and
higher education reform. Dordrecht: Springer.
Raby, Rosalind L., and Edward J. Valeau. 2012. Educational borrowing and the emergence of
community college global counterparts. In International perspectives on education and society,
ed. Alex W. Wiseman, Andrea Chase-Mayorla, T. Janis, and A. Sachdev, 19–46. New York:
Emerald.
Raby, Rosalind L., and Edward J. Valeau. 2016. Introduction. In International education at
community colleges: Themes, practices, and case studies, ed. Rosalind Latiner Raby and
Edward J. Valeau, 1–6. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
The World Bank. 2014. Nepal - second higher education project. Washington, DC: World Bank
Group.
The World Bank. 2015. Nepal. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/nepal.
Tribhuvan University. 2016. Monthly archives. Retrieved from http://tribhuvan-university.edu.np/
2016/09/.
UGC. 2012. Education management information system report on higher education 2011/12.
Bhaktapur: University Grants Commission.
UGC. 2015. Higher education reforms project (HERP) 2014/15-2019/20. [Project booklet].
Bhaktapur: University Grants Commission.
Valeau, E.J. 2013. The Indian community college in India: An evolving model. In The U.S.
community college model: Potential for applications in India. Edited by N. Jha. (pp. 34–36).
New York, NY: Institute of International Education.
Handbook of
Comparative Studies
on Community
Colleges and Global
Counterparts