Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Devon C. Wilson
Amber L. Ward, MS, OTR/L, BCPR, ATP/SMS, FAOTA June 22, 2022
continuing education. I limited my search to video presentation under the topic of “assistive
term.
Course Selections
The first webinar I selected was course 5007, “Creating Functional Homes for Dementia,”
presented by Emily Reilly, DHSc, MSORT/L, ECHM. This webinar was one hour, nine minutes,
and fifty-one seconds long. The learning objectives were as follows: identify in-home functional
design concepts to improve quality of life for those living with dementia; list at least three
factors to consider when assessing a home for someone with dementia; recognize the value
occupational therapists offer in decreasing caregiver burden when designing for dementia in
the home (Reilly, 2021). I chose this webinar because working in home health, I see a significant
number of clients with dementia, and I am passionate about aging in place initiatives.
The second webinar I selected was course 3039, “Cognitive Technologies: Preparing for the
ATP Exam,” presented by Michelle Lange, OTR, ABDA, ATP/SMS. This webinar was one hour and
six seconds long. The learning objectives were as follows: the participant will be able to list
three functional areas which may be impacted by cognitive disabilities; the participant will be
able to list three strategies to assist with task completion and organization for clients with
cognitive disabilities; the participant will be able to list three general compensatory strategies
for people with learning disabilities (Lange, 2016). Even though I will not be taking the ATP
exam any time soon, based on the reviews and course description, I felt this course would be a
good overview of the use of assistive technology for cognitive function in a wide variety of
cases.
Creating Functional Homes for Dementia was a great introductory course that was
engaging and easy to follow. The course started out with discussion on guiding principles for
practice that included consideration of the client before the diagnosis, incorporation of both
the physical and social environments, and prioritizing occupations living with dementia (Reilly,
2021). It included relevant case studies and examples throughout to facilitate meaning and
enhance learning.
As per Reilly (2021), dementia friendly spaces include accessible, sensory friendly design
with reduced clutter, removal of safety hazards, and monitoring devices if needed. With the
advent of smart technology and electrical timers, automation of tasks and smart home
design principles to support the adult with dementia included open floor plans, relevant color
palettes, external visual and audio cues (signs, labels, audio alarms/reminders), and the use of
technology. Some technological aspects that were discussed included the use of motion-sensor
medical alert systems via an accelerometer system), and tracking for individuals who are at risk
This course was geared towards setting up homes for adults with dementia, but other
clinical populations with cognitive concerns could benefit from some of these suggestions as
well, such as some autistic adults, stroke survivors with cognitive involvement, or adults with
acquired brain injury. Overall, I felt this course was a good synthesis of general knowledge and
how to apply it to a specific population. I felt that I met the learning objectives as laid out and
that I will be able to implement the knowledge I gained from this course in my clinical practice. I
work a lot with my clients and their families on home modifications, and I am confident and
excited about some of the new recommendations I will be able to make to improve their ability
Cognitive Technologies: Preparing for the ATP Exam was just as I thought it would be – a
great overall review of technology options for various cognitive concerns. This course began by
differentiating clinical disabilities from functional disabilities, noting that not all clinical
disabilities result in a functional cognitive disability (Lange, 2016). Some of the topics that were
covered include different domains of cognitive difficulties such as organization, memory, and
focus. There were significant suggestions for applications to facilitate organization, money and
health management, memory and reminders, and task breakdown/completion (Lange, 2016).
After the course, I searched some of the recommended apps and was highly impressed with the
different options. While a few of the suggested apps do not appear to be available on the Apple
App Store anymore, there were plenty of other options with similar aims. I was even able to
find some apps that I felt would assist with my own executive dysfunction issues.
Beyond smartphone apps, this course covered general suggestions for management of
cognition deficits to include the use of consistency and routine in daily life, task simplification,
reduction of choice fatigue, and home modifications such as reducing clutter (Lange, 2016).
Technology was discussed according to specific need or area of the home, like the kitchen,
bathroom, or wandering behavior. I was glad that external locks were not an option that was
discussed for wandering behavior. Lange (2016) instead suggested the use of door alarms and
bio-locks. Since this course was created and published, even more technology has been
Additionally, Lange (2016) also covered technology to assist with learning disabilities such as
applications and programs to assist with writing, reading, educational pursuits, and executive
function deficits. I was also very happy to see that the use of abbreviation enhancement was
enhancement heavily in both my personal and professional life. The intervention was suggested
school that was limited by focus deficits. Having a personal connection to different technology
and recommendations allows me to connect more deeply with clients and share lived
Given that this course was designed as an overview for exam preparation, the
information within applies to a wide range of clinical populations. Some such populations
include autistic children and adults, people with down syndrome, traumatic brain injury,
dementia, learning disabilities, and attention disorders (Lange, 2016). I felt that this course gave
technology with my clients and in my own life. I am very familiar with smart home technology
and still found myself learning about options that I had not yet considered. I would be thrilled
to see an update added to this course to address the significant advancements made in
I felt that both courses were beneficial to my personal learning and practice. While
Creating Functional Homes for Dementia was more geared towards my personal clinical
practice, I felt like I learned more new information from Cognitive Technologies: Preparing for
the ATP Exam. Creating Homes for Dementia was more of a synthesis of known knowledge with
some new information throughout – that is not a negative about the webinar itself, but just a
result of my prior experience. Seeing all that information laid out in one place was highly
beneficial for me as a clinician. Cognitive Technologies: Preparing for the ATP Exam, was a more
general course that offered significant recommendations for a very wide range of clients.
Despite being somewhat dated compared to the rapidly expanding technology-market, all the
basic principles were solid. I felt like this course provided me with a good amount of insight to
cognitive adaptations and interventions that are occupational therapy specific as well, as
discussion of cognitive intervention is often heralded as the territory of speech therapy despite
its well-established functional purposes. I feel strongly that a good knowledge base of cognitive
technology within the scope of occupational therapy practice also promotes our unique
OccupationalTherapy.com.
https://www.occupationaltherapy.com/ot-ceus/course/creating-functional-homes-for-
dementia-5007
Reilly, E. (2021, February 8). Cognitive Technologies: Preparing for the ATP Exam.
OccupationalTherapy.com
https://www.occupationaltherapy.com/ot-ceus/course/cognitive-technologies-
preparing-for-atp-3039