Step 1: Use and Imposed Load Orange (Roof), Green (First Floor) and Blue (Ground Floor) ‘Table 23: Imposed loads: categories and characteristic values [D8-SE-AE(2000), Table 3.1] Ganon, seca hin Coors Bat tg ore, ey wet jroo ca es mtn nong 60 40 (perp aes rosea etn Teoma tence wes mp eee erie bang. Ne ose raeyeaton ecar Ce Keaswtvponse paca setnn, EO 1” ‘Goon nhc ges ram, i oe gre 05 heen macctee wueprrapen 50 4“ tg mttongs ts pu oi Bo Cerca hatter ‘oon weno nce oss (aney pase 0g eee Pa frente ons, ogee ap ere Te oo 3 Eimer 8793 ae ee Sonat sae me) G2 _Rotuwtnaveprinon or 00 20 Step 2: Slab self-weight Table 2.1: Sell-welght for typlcal constructo elements [DB-SE-AE(2000), Tablo C.5]. For additonal values, you may rafer to [DB-SE-AE(2009), Appendix C) Element ‘Seltwelght ‘Slabs Tkn/m?] Bidirectional sib, total thickness <0.35 m 4 Sold coneteia lab, total thickness 0.20.m 5 Scanned with CamScannerStep 3: Partitions weight 2.1.3, Permanent loads, EN 1991-1-1 2.1.3.1 Partitions and walls Tn goneral, and as a simplification, Rwil be enough to con- sider as the weight of tho parttion wall an additional load of 1.0kN for each m? of the constructed aro Step 4: Snow Load 2.2.2 Snow, EN 1991-1-3 ‘Table 2.5: Snow load in capital cis [DB-SE-AE(2008), Tablo 2.6] oy, ‘Ritode Snow iy "Aitode Snow {m] toad [rm] load N/m?) bain} ‘Abacow 690 08 Malaga Oceans Alicante o 02 Murcia 40 02 Almeria, 0 02 Orense 130 (04 ata 1130 10 Oviedo m0 05 Badajoz 180 02 Palencia m0 (04 Barcel O4 Palma de Mallorca 0 02 Cs (@ ee Pal oo Burgos 06 Pamplona 5007) Cécores 04 —T Céetz 70 05 Castellon of 2 o Os Ciudad Real 640 of © 03 Cordoba 100 ee Gouna 0 OB 10 02 Guonea 1010.0 1090 09 Girona 70 04 ° 04 Granada 6900S on on Guadalajom 68008 50 09 Huova = «002 55005 Huesca 47007 os oe ssn 570 04 60 04 Leén 12 20 (OF Urda 15005 60 04 Logrofo 38008 21005 Loge 470 07 on Oe iid 66008 0 gt Scanned with CamScannerStep 5: Contributory area width This frame ‘Coupe war le plafond ' Step 6: Table i d Contribut oon Impose ontributory load reve |e Bbgtenesn artes eam] ene (| wea | cn ‘Step2 Step 3 ‘Step 1 ‘Step 4 Step 5 ‘srea) x "y natin Root GS 3 ° 0,4 07 6 x 0,4 = 2,4] First floor AL 3 1 = o 6x2=12 |Ground floor | At 3 1 2 oO 6x2=12 Step 7: Diagram 132 kN a'3.16 kim, 24 kN Scanned with CamScanner‘Step 8: Roughness Factor (Red) and Wind pressure (Blue) Table 2.6: Roughness factor [DB-SE-AE(2009), Tablo 3.4] ‘Considered height (half ofthe windward facade) [rn] Terninroogtress 3] 1” Soa or coastal arca a4 35 37 { lr i nL a ff 3S 3133 35 Yt Jt eS 27 20 34 ee 22 24 26 | Halfof the windward facade $34327/2 18 19 20 SS Dynamic wind pressure As a simpliication, at any polnt in the ‘Spanish territory, the value 0.5kN/m? mayibe@dopted. More pre-| cise values may bo obtained through [DB-SE-AE(2009), Annex D}, according to the geographical location of the zwolhif Roughness factor4S The roughness factor, cn, Kodi for the (0B Se-AE 00, variability of the mean wind velocity at the site of the strictire due 223), to the height above ground level, and the ground roughness offthe terrain near the structure in the considered wind direction. In urban buildings up to 8 floors, a constant valve, ronripssel ey height, of ce = 2.0 may be taken; Step 9: Slenderness (Red) and Pressure Coeffcient (Blue) Slenderness = h /W (343#1)/(2+642) = 7/10 = 0,7 Table 2.7: Pressure coefficients [DB-SE-AE(2009), Tablo 3.5] ‘Stendornoss Inthe paral plana to tha wind drton <025 050 ford 100 125 260 Pressure coefiicont (winward), 070 070 Joel 0.80 0.80 Suction eoward), ce 030 040 250-060 0.70 Scanned with CamScannerStep 10: Contributory area width ‘Step 11: Wind action Facade pressure Roughness |sienderness| PTeSSUr® hwind action in| Contributory | Uniform ‘an factor Shope | e0eticiet laced ckNimore8 rind oad Windware 05 13 07 0,80 O81 390.8 Geese sex 6-| Step 12: Diagram The two options are good, but you need to check the wind load. Another way to check the results, are the reactions at the supports. 12, 30.92 kNm P= 6.4 AN a 1 15 kt Scanned with CamScanner‘Step 13: Safety Value: Dead Load (Red) and Live Load (Blue) “Table 3.1: Partial factors >for loads [DB-SE(2018), Table 4.1] ‘Verification type Action type Untavourable Favourable Resistance [Dsadioad weight, sol weight 0.80 ‘Stability >) Destabiizing _ Stabiizing \S)) deadioad ~f ‘Sett-weight, soll weight 1.10 0.90 / tacagistee 1B , Seite | he a ‘Step 14: Combination Factor: Imposed Load (Red), Snow (Blue) and Wind (Orange) Table 3.2: Combination factors 4} for actions[OB-SE(2019), Table u & 05 03 os 03 Public areas (Category C) 07 07 08 ‘Shopping areas (Category D) 07 07 08 Tratic apd,parking areas for light vehicles 07 07 0s (CatogotyE) * } AceassBe ol (Category F) These coresponng to the use fom Scanned with CamScannerStep 15: ULS Values 3.3.1. Considered combinations for ULS Fundamental situation. ‘The design value of the effects of the actions corresponding to a persistent or transitory situation Is determined by the following com- bination of actions, called fundamental? Eosta citn e mates D3 Sr1a10es (6.2) Sets cases, the actual stength where the following actions are considered simultaneously: was Bighee, [Ecozote), + allpermanent loads, inthe design valve (yo); + any ve load, in design value load considered as the mai must be adopted as such che-ét different analyses, tof the moe + the rest of the variable (live) actior or. ). There is ehways one live ‘Al the existing live loads ther successively in ifable situation; she shwain design valve (oto) pp. se(o%0, 42210) lLoad type Characteristic (aim eaed [Combination value| peed eee re 30 3.0% 1,95 = 4,05 | 4,05 Dead Toad (sab) eos one [401,95 =5,40 | 5.40 |mposed ead (oot 04 oax1s=06 [o8x9=0 lmposed tad (lab) 20 20x18=30 [80x07= 2 [Snow toad O7 Jo7x1s= 105 |1.05x05~0.506 [Wind oad (windward facade) |g 52 052% 1,5=0,74 |,78x06= 0.468 [Wind oad eewardtacade) | 0.26 0.26 x1,5 = 099 [038 x08 = 0204 * structural model © we're going to consider only the fundamental ULS combination; (© consider wind load as the main variable load; © draw the structural frame in https://structural-analyser.com/. ‘© assume a structural section with the following properties: = A=400cm? = 1=13000cm* = €=21GPa © apply the loads corresponding to the fundamental ULS combination in the model (you will have to add the values of those loads applied to the same structural element); ‘© include a screen capture of the model with the applied loads and the resulting bending moment diagram © fillina table like the following, with the required information Scanned with CamScannerStep 16: ULS COMBINATION [Total applied load [Structural —_|Applied dead load (permanent + variable) inno lienim /APpllod varable load (kNim) (Parma 405x6= 24,3 |(0,6 + 0,525) x6 = 6,75 +6,75« JRoot beam — |esopt8xSten5 [Step a8 (Imposed « Snow) Sips (24:9 + 6,75 = 31,05 540x6=32,4 | 3,0x6= 180 + 18,0= Slab beam Isto 15x Seo” {Sto 1 impose) x Seo S24 + 18,0604 Windward 0.78 x6 = 4,68 4,68 lracade Step 15x Step 10 2 Leeward facade 0.29 x 6 = 2,04 2,34 Stop 15 x Stop 10 Step 17: Final Diagram 31.1 kim 31.1 kN, 17.49 kim 65.15 ktim fh 18.52 kW pt }-67.66 kN a7 ae? i t 641.02 kN 677.48 KN Scanned with CamScannerThis assignment intends to be your introduction to structural design. We will use a very simple online tool for the analysis itself, https://structural-analyser,comy. Your focus should be on assessing the loads which are applied in the frame. You need to use the load tables in the paf document, as well as understand how the loads are obtained (check Section 3.5 on your book). You are asked to produce the structural model forthe frame given in the drawing and attached paf, which corresponds to the intial proposal for the Dom-ino house by Le Corbusier in 1914. ‘Assume it is a frame structure, composed of rigid connections, and fully fixed to the foundation. itis 2 regular building, with a 1-way slab between the frames. The assignment consists of two parts: © load assessment ‘© obtain the surface loads (in kN/m?) = deadloads: ‘© self-weight of the slab; © partitions self-weight; * live loads ‘© assume the building is residential ‘© Imposed loads at each level ‘© snow. Assuming the building is located in Pamplona and exposed to wind. (© calculate the uniform loads for each type of load (in kN/m), applied in the beams of the central frame * remember you need to first determine the contributory area width © fillina table ike the following, with the previous information Scanned with CamScannerThis assignment continues the previous week one, but this time it asks you to assess the wind loads. The building to analyze is the same, the Dom-ino house, and the same frame. Use the same online tool for the analysis itself, https://structural-analyser.com/. Your focus should be on assessing the wind loads which are applied in the frame. You need to use the load tables in the pdf document, as well as again understand how the loads in the frame are obtained (check again Section 3.5 on your book, and the worked examples in Section 14.1). ‘Again, you are asked to produce the structural model for the frame given in the drawing and attached pdf, which corresponds to the initial proposal for the Dom-ino house by Le Corbusier in 1914, but this time only for the wind loads. Assume itis a frame structure, composed of rigid connections, and fully fixed to the foundation. Itis a regular building, with a 1-way slab between the frames. ‘The wind direction to be considered is drawn in the pdf and drawing below. Assume the building is located in an urban area, ‘The assignment consists of two parts: * wind load assessment © obtain the wind action (in N/m?) for the wind blowing dynamic wind pressure; = roughness factor; "pressure coefficient for both windward and leeward facades. © fillin.a table like the following, with the previous information 2234 Wind action Fi teP ates san te Wind action, in general, Is represented as a pressure perpendicular Se tothe surface of each exposed point. The pressure value (in kN/m?) S to be applied at the windward and leeward facades*?, qq, may be _*I08-SERE(2000), obtained Gay) o= Iwo p, (22) where: * qois the dynamic wind pressure. See Section 2.2.3.1. + is the roughness factor, See 2.2.3.1 “Translated in Spanish «8s coeficiente do axposicién, + cps the wind or pressure coefficient,. See Section 2.2.3.1. 14 UM. Cabrero, 2022 Scanned with CamScannerThis assignment continues the two previous ones. This week we will finalize the design procedure, by obtaining one of the to be analyzed load cases. ‘The building to analyze is the same, the Dom-ino house, and the same frame. Use the same online tool for the analysis itself, https://structural-analyser.com/. Your focus this time is on getting the right load combination. You need to use the obtained loads (dead, imposed, snow, wind) from the previous weeks. Again, you are asked to produce the structural model for the frame given in the drawing and attached pdf, which corresponds to the initial proposal for the Dom-ino house by Le Corbusier in 1914, Assume itis a frame structure, composed of rigid connections, and fully fixed to the foundation. It is a regular building, with a 1-way slab between the frames. As in the previous assignment, the wind direction to be considered is drawn in the pdf and drawing below. Assume the building is located in an urban area. (Same data as for the previous week). The assignment consists of two parts: © load values ‘© for each load type, and for the fundamental ULS combination, obtain the load to be applied on the structural element (in kN/m, the contributory area considered already). "characteristic value, = design value, * combination value. © fillin.a table like the following, with the previous information Scanned with CamScanner128.96 Scanned with CamScanner