Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
Chapter Outline
2
Lecture 6
Public Expenditure Review
3
1. Overview on Public
Expenditure
Review/Analysis
4
PER: Definition
Definition:
A key diagnostics instrument used to evaluate the effectiveness of
public finances.
A PER typically analyzes government expenditures over a period of
years to assess (i) their consistency with policy priorities; and (ii) what
results were achieved.
5
The need for conducting PER (1)
Why PER is needed?
Strengthen rationales for government programs
Make governments and donors better able to assess: (i) the
impact of their investment; and (ii) the effectiveness of
budget planning and execution.
PERs help diagnose spending problems and help countries
develop more effective and transparent budget allocations.
Strengthen staff capacity
Improve knowledge on budget allocation, management and evaluation
Timely adjust budget allocation regulations and norms to be aligned
with reality.
6
Strengthen citizens’ participation in budget oversight
The need for conducting PER (2)
Why PER is needed?
Establish a baseline understanding of key
fiscal management and policy challenges
Highlight priority reform areas for
policymakers, and
Set the agenda for the next phase of budgetary
planning.
7
Types of PER
◼ Countrywide PER
◼ Sectoral PER
8
Countrywide PER
9
Sectoral PER
◼ Reviewing macroeconomic and sectoral context
◼ Assessing size of the sector and its importance in the economy
◼ Assessing priorities within the sector
◼ Evaluating sector performance
◼ Evaluating public expenditure within the sector
◼ Scope and extent of evaluation
◼ Spending composition
◼ Funding sources to finance expenditures
◼ Other issues: The extent to meet four principles (four pillars)
1
2. Overview on Program based
PER: Case of transfer programs
1
Why transfer program is needed?
1
Difficulty in program-based PER analysis
◼ Income measuring
◼ Non-cash earnings
◼ Income observation and measurement time period
◼ Disagreement in income measurement unit: individual level
vs. household level vs. community level
◼ Relative price effect: Chain effects
◼ Short-term vs. Long-term effects
◼ Public goods
1
Classification of transfer programs
◼ By recipients’ eligibility
◼ Mean-tested
◼ Universal
◼ By transferring modes
◼ Cash transfer
◼ In-kind transfer
◼ Subsidized price
1
Mean-tested program
◼ Spending program whose benefits flow only
to those whose financial resources fall
below a certain level.
◼ Strengths:
◼ Eligibility is easily determined
◼ Administrative cost is saved
◼ Weakness:
◼ Broad beneficiary coverage
◼ Heavy burden for state 1
Universal transfer
◼ Spending program whose eligibility conditions go
beyond income threshold to include other conditions
such as living areas, age, gender and alike.
◼ Strength:
◼ Eligible recipients are more precisely identified
◼ Minimize cheating or fraud motivations
◼ Weakness:
◼ High administrative cost
1
Classification of transfer programs by
transferring modes: Cash transfer
◼ Definition: a direct transfer payment of money to an
eligible person
◼ Classification:
◼ Unconditional cash transfer: program that provides benefits
without any conditions upon the receivers' actions.
◼ Conditional cash transfer: program that makes welfare receipt
conditional upon the receivers' actions.
◼ The government only transfers the money to persons who meet
certain criteria.
◼ These criteria may include enrolling children into public schools,
getting regular check-ups at the doctor's office, receiving
vaccinations, or the 1
In-kind transfer and subsidized price