Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Top
Managers
Middle Managers
First-Line Managers
Nonmanagerial Employees
role of the top level Role of The middle level Role of The lower level
Management is the process of getting things done. effectively and elficiently, through other people.
Jack Welch GE
Steve.Jobs - Apple
Meg Whitman - eBay
1
Functions of a manager:
Planning
Organizing
Staffing
Directing
Controlling
Pamiy Lead to
DECISION ANALYSIS
Decision-Making Conditions
certainty
When managers make decisions,
they face three conditions risk
uncertainty
STEP 2: Identification of all the courses of action that are available to the decision maker [Aj|.
There are six possible actions.
A Buy 18 copies.
A2 Buy 19 copies.
As Buy 20 copies.
A Buy 21 copies.
As Buy 22 copies.
A6 Buy 23 copies.
P 20Q
When, D Q then P 100D 30(Q- D) - 80Q
P- 100D + 30Q - 30D - 80Q
P 70D-50Q
3
PAY-OFF TABLE
20Q 20x18 200 20x19 70D 50Q= 70D 50Q 70D 50Q =
70D 50Q
=19 360 380 (70x19)- (70x 19)- (70x19) (70x19)-
(5Ox20) =330 (50x21) = 280 (50x22) = 230 (50x23) = 180
(70x21)-
(50x22) =370 50x23) 320
E-22 200 = 20x18
200 20x19 20Q 20x20 200 20x21 20Q 20x22
360 380 =400 = 420
70D 50Q=
=440 (70x22) -
(50x23) = 390
20Q 20x18 200 20x 19 20Q 20x20 200 20x21 200 20x22 200 20x23
23 360 380 =400 = 420
=440 =460
is the amount of pay-off foregone by not adopting the optimal course of action
which would give the highest pay-off. for each possible event
The pay-off matrix can be'transformed into an opportunity loss/regret matrix by subtracting from the
highest profit value in each row, all other value in that row.
OPPORTUNITY LOSS/REGRET TABLE
-18 20
A
21 22 23
40 20 S0 100 TSO
20
60 40 20 0 50 100
=21
E-22 80 60 40 20 50
100 80 60 40 20 0
-23
G)LAPLACE PRINCIPLE
Act Mean(Expected)Pay-of
(360+360+360+360+360+360)/6 = 360
A =18
(310+380-+380+380+380+380) / 6 = 368.3
A2=19
SELECTED]
As=20 (260+330+400+400+400+400)/6= 365
AG=23 (110+180+250+320H390+460)/6=285
In case of profit:
considered & among them the maximum
The minimum pay-offs resulting from various strategies are
value is selected.
5
In case of costs:
Minimax Choosing the best(minimum) cost from the set of worst (maximum) cost
(iii)MAXIMAX or MINIMIN PRINCIPLE
Principle adopted by optimistic decision makers.
In case of profit:
vaue
The maximum pay-offs resulting from various strategies are considered & anong them the highest
selected.
Maximum profit associated with various actions:
AtRs.360 A:
Rs.400 As Rs440 Since the maximum
of these is Rs.460
A2: Rs.380 A4: Rs.420 AG: Rs.460 so. Ar is selected.
In case of costs:
The minimum cost for each alternative is considered & then the alternative which minimizes the minimum
cost is selected.
(iv)HURWICZ PRINCIPLE
lt stipulates that a decision maker's view fall somewhere between extreme pessimism and extreme
optimism.
Forthis,anindex of optimism, a, is defined on a scale ranging from 0 o 1.
Act Ma Min Criterion Value=u(Max Value) + (1-0(Min
Valuc)
(0.6 x 360) + (0.4 x 360) = 360
Ai 360 360
Since the value associated with Ai is the maximum so the decision is to choose Ai.
E-22 0.10 80 60 40 20 0 50
E23 0.05 100 80 60 40 20
7
Expected value of perfect information (EVP)
EPPI = (0.05 x 360) +(0.10 x 380) + (0.30 x 400) + (0.40 x 420) + (0.10 x 440) + (0.05 x 460) 41
EVPI = EPPI E P
=
411 -
386
F 25
BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT
GENERAL
EXTERNAL
GENERAL ENVIRONMENT
PESTLE ANALYSIS
TASK ENVIRONMENT
PORTER'S FIVE COMPETITIVE FORCES
Competitive environment is the environment which organization's face within its specific area of
operation, & this can be understood at an industry level.
8
the sane product or norc broadly the group
austry is recognized as a group of firns producing
OIhenms producing products that are close substitutes lor cach other.
five forces framework developed by Michacl Porter is the most widely known tool lor analy /1np
the competitive environment.
T h e s e lorces determine the intensity of compctition and hence allraclivecness ol an industry
2.Bargainingpower ofsuppliers
the firm.
SupplierS provide inputs to terms and conditions of
of goods and services and other
Suppliers' decisions on prices. quality an industry.
on the profit trends of
delivery have significant impact
may have
m o r e power:
Suppliers Airbus and Boeing).
numbers compared to buyers(Eg:
are in concentrated
If they a move to another supplier(Eg:
firms may have
I f there are switching costs associated with
high
located their production unit adjacent to a supplier's manufacturing facilities).
has moved from exploration and retining of oil to
If they are integrate forward (Eg: Reliance
able to
retail petrol pumps).
selling of oil througlh its own
differentiated.
If their product is highly
3.Bargaining power of customers customers who ultimately consume its products or the
be the individual
An industry's buyers may such as retailers and wholesalers.
intermediaries that distribute
the industry's products to end users, and offer more and
sellers to lower prices. improve product quality,
Strong buyers can pressure
better services.
9
Buyers may have more power:
I f buyers are more concentrated than sellers.
More information (with respect to competitive pricing. product specifications, sales process)
If there is credible threat of backward
Integration by buyers.
Eg: IKEA
I the Customer purchases large volumes of standardized products from the seller.
I f switching costs are low.
I t substitute products are available on the market, buyer power is high.
10