MSS SP-61-2019 Pressure Testing of Valves Standard Practice Developed and Approved by the Manufacturers Standardization Society of the Valve and Fittings Industry, Inc. 127 Park Street, NE Vienna, Virginia 22180-4602 Phone: (703) 281-6613 eee Fax: (703) 281-6671 TTT E-mail: standards@msshq.orgMSS STANDARD PRACTICE SP-61 ‘This MSS Standard Practice was developed under the consensus of MSS Technical Committees 114, Steel Valves, and the MSS Coordinating Committee. The content of this Standard Practice is the resulting efforts of knowledgeable and experienced industry volunteers to provide an effective, clear, and non-exclusive standard that will benefit the industry as a whole, This MSS Standard Practice describes minimal requirements and is intended asa basis for common practice by the manufacturer, the user, and the industry at large. Itis the responsibility ofthe user ofthis Standard Practice to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory requirements prior to use. The existence of an MSS Standard Practice does not in itself preclude the ‘manufacture, sale, or use of products not conforming to the Standard Practice. Mandatory conformance to this Standard Practice is established only by reference in other documents such as a code, specification, sales contract, or public law, as applicable. MSS has no power, nor does it undertake, to enforce or certify compliance with this document. Any certification or other statement of compliance with the requirements ofthis Standard Practice shall not be attributable to MSS and is solely the responsibility of the certfier or maker of the statement. "Unless otherwise specifically noted in this MSS Standard Practice, other standards documents referred to herein are identified by the date of issue that was applicable to this Standard Practice at the date of issue of this Standard Practice (see Annex A). This Standard Practice shall remain silent on the applicability of those other standards of prior or subsequent dates of issue even though applicable provisions may not have changed.” By publication of this Standard Practice, no position is taken with respect to the validity of any potential clain(s) or of any patent rights in connection therewith. MSS shall not be held responsible for identifying any patent rights. Users are expressly advised that determination of patent rights and the risk of infringement of such rights are entirely their responsibility. For all MSS Standard Practices, the term “shall” means “must” and *shall not” means “must not” In this Standard Practice, all text, notes, annexes, tables, figures, and references are construed to be “normative” and essential to understand the standard’s message. All appendices and footnotes, or any other information denoted as “supplemental”, that may be included within this Standard Practice, DO NOT involve mandatory or normative requirements. ‘The U.S. customary units and SI (metric) units in this Standard Practice are regarded separately as the standard; each should be used independently of the other. Combining or converting values between the two systems may result in non-conformance with this Standard Practice, Substantive changes in this 2019 edition are "flagged" by parallel bars as shown on the margins of this paragraph. The specific detail of the change may be determined by ‘comparing the material flagged with that in the previous 2013 edition. Non-toleranced dimensions in the Standard Practice are nominal unless otherwise specified. Excerpts of this Standard Practice may be quoted with written permission. Credit lines should read ‘Extracted from MSS SP-61-2019 with permission of the publisher, Manufacturers Standardization Society of the Valve and Fittings Industry’. Reproduction and/or electronic transmission or dissemination is prohibited under copyright convention unless writen permission is granted by the Manufacturers Standardization Society of the Valve and Fittings Industry Inc. All rights reserved. Originally Published: February 1961 Current Edition Approved: September 2019 Current Edition Published: December 2019 MSS js a registered trademark of the Manufacturers Standardization Society of the Valve and Fittings Industry, Ine Copyright ©, 2019 by ‘Manufacturers Standardization Society of the Valve and Fittings Industry, Ine. Printed in U.S.A.MSS STANDARD PRACTICE SP-61 FOREWORD This Standard Practice for Pressure Testing of Valves was originally adopted in 1961. It was developed for the purpose of providing a uniform means of testing valves commonly used in the "full open” and "full closed" type of service. For control valves, refer to standards ISA-75.19.01 and FCI 70-2, which may be ‘more appropriate for control valve pressure testing, With the identification of General Purpose, Special Service, and Severe Service Valves, an MSS Standard Practice has been recently introduced for supplementary high-pressure testing; namely, “Supplemental HP Gas Test Procedures for Valves”. MSS SP-61 continues to be offered as a means of testing for all valves, regardless of criticality. CAUTION: Safety precautions must be taken when gas is used,STANDARD PRACTICE This Page Intentionally Left Blank Manufacturers Standardization Society of the Valve and Fittings Industry iii SP-61MSS STANDARD PRACTICE SP-61 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 SCOPE veel [2 DEFINITIONS i 3 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS. I SHELL LEAKAGE TESTS... |S SEATCLOSURE TESTS. TABLE 1 Shell Leakage Test Duration 2 2 Alternate Gas Test 3 3. Seat Closure Test Duration ... 5 4 Units of Leakage per NPS/DN ... s ANNEX A Referenced Standards and Applicable Dates 6MSS STANDARD PRACTICE PRESSURE TESTING OF VALVES. 1, SCOPE This Standard Practice establishes requirements and aeceptance criteria for shell and seat closure pressure testing of valves, 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1 No Visible Leakage 2.1.1 The term "no visible leakage", applied to a hydrostatic test liquid, is defined as a leak rate that will produce no visible weeping or formation of drops (1) atthe test pressure area and (2) for the duration of the test 2.1.2 The term "no visible leakage", as applied to air or gas testing, is defined as a leak rate" that Will produce no visible formation of bubbles in a water immersion test or after application of leak | detection fluid at the test pressure and for the duration of the test. 2.1.3. For automatic leak detection methods, this definition shall be considered equivalent to a leak rate no greater than 4.1 x 10° in’/sec (6.7 x 10 ml/sec)" with a pressure differential of 80 to 100 psi (5.5 to 6.9 bar) for application to valves of NPS 8 (DN 200) and smaller. 2.2 Production Pressure Test Pressure tests, which include closure member and shell leakage tests, shall be performed on production units manufactured for sale. Production pressure tests verify the pressure containing capability of production units. 2.3. Shell Leakage Test | Internal pressure tests of the pressure containing envelope to demonstrate pressure containing capability of the external pressure boundary. 24 Seat and Closure Member Test Internal pressure test of the flow isolating elements (seats, seals, and closure member such as gate, disc, ball, or plug) to demonstrate static pressure performance within allowable leakage rate tolerances. 3. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 3.1 The manufacturer shall be responsible for the performance of tests specified herein. 3.2. Fluid for shell and seat closure tests shall be air, inert gas, or liquid, such as water (which may contain a corrosion inhibitor), kerosene, or other fluid with viscosity not greater than that of water. ‘Temperature of the test fluid shall not exceed 125 °F (52 °C). 3.3. Valves shall be substantially relieved of air or gas when tested with liquid. ‘NOTE: (1) This leakage rate is based on the measured leakage of nitrogen gas from a needle valve with a0.167 in. (4.24 mm) O.D. x 0.091 in. 2.31 mm). LD. tube submerged in water to a depth of | in.(25.4 mm). The tube end was cut square and smooth with no chamfers or burs and the tube axis was parallel to the surface of the water. Leakage ‘was adjusted to a level equa to 40 bubbles in 10 minutes at 90 psi (6.2 bar). The 40 bubbles equaled 1.6 ml or, | bubble = 0.04 SCC. Using this data lak rate equivalent to 1 bubble every minute is found to be 4.1 x 10 insee (6.7 x 10" mise0).MSS STANDARD PRACTICE S 3.4. Seat closure tests for NPS 4 (DN 100) and larger valves shall be conducted after an acceptable shell test. Seat closure tests for smaller valves may be conducted before or after the shell test at the ‘manufacturer's option. However, when valves conform to ASME B16.34, the requirements of Section 7.2 of ASME B16.34 shall apply. 3.5. Valves shall be shell tested prior to painting. Corrosion protection treatment such as phosphatizing may be applied prior to shell testing. Valves with internal linings, lining, or internal coatings that form a design feature of the valve, may be tested with the liner, lining, or intemnal/external coating(s) in place If pressure tests in the presence of purchaser's representative are specified, valves that were painted following successful pressure testing may be retested without removal of paint. 3.6 Valve test fixture loads applied to valve ends shall be limited to those required to effectively seal the valve ends. 3.7 Leakage detection devices, e.g., pressure decay devices, may be used for detecting leakage provided that they perform at the pressures specified in Sections 4 and 5. ‘The valve manufacturer shall be able to demonstrate that, when these devices are used, the test results are equivalent to the requirements of this Standard Practice. 4, SHELL LEAKAGE TESTS 4.1 Each valve shall be given a shell leakage test at a gauge pressure no less than 1.5 times the valve’s 100 °F (38 °C) design pressure rating, rounded off to the next higher 25 psi (1 bar) increment. 4.2. Shell leakage tests shall be conducted with the valve in the partially open position and with the valve ends closed. Pressure retaining parts of valves may be tested separately when the valves have internal components, such as diaphragms in diaphragm valves, which are not designed to withstand required shell test pressures. The manufacturer's nameplate data shall contain reference to this limitation, 4.3 Visual leakage through the pressure boundary walls is not acceptable, Stem seal leakage during shell test shall not be cause for rejection. Stem seals shall be capable of retaining pressure at least equal to the valve’s 100 °F (38 °C) design pressure rating without visible leakage. 4.4 The minimum duration of the shell leakage test shall be per Table 1 CAUTION: Safety precautions must be taken when gas is used. TABLE 1 Shell Leakage Test Duration Valve Test Time NPS DN Seconds 2and Smaller | S0and Smaller | _15 2%-6 65-150 60 =12 200-300 120 14 and Larger | 350 and Larger| 300MSS STANDARD PRACTICE SP-61 SEAT CLOSURE TESTS 5.1 Each valve designed for shutoff or isolation service, such as stop valves and check valves, shall be given a fluid seat closure tightness test. 5.1.1 The seat closure test shall be performed at a fluid (liquid or gas) pressure no less than 1.1 times the valve’s 100 °F (38 °C) design pressure rating rounded to the next higher 5 psi (0.5 bar). | At the manufacturer's option, a gas pressure of no less than 80 psi (5.5 bar) may be substituted for the | valve sizes and pressure classes listed in Table 2 ns must be taken wi CAUTION: Safety precaut gas TABLE 2 Alternate Gas Test Valve Size NPS (DN) 12 (300) and Smaller | 300 and Lower 4 (100) and Smaller All Pressure Class 5.1.2 Seat closure testing shall be performed with seat surfaces free of materials that aid in sealing except as provided for in Sections 5.1.3 and 5.1.4. 5.1.3 When necessary to prevent damage during valve actuation, a light oil of viscosity no greater that of kerosene may be applied to seating surfaces. 5.1.4 When a valve's primary seat design is based on the presence of a sealant material, e.g, lubricated plug valves, the sealant material may be in place. When itis intended that sealants act as secondary or back-up seat seals, the sealant material shall not be in place during the closure test. 5.1.5 When lubricants are used for assembly operations, it is not required that these be removed prior to testing if their presence has no influence on the test results 5.2 For valves of the double seating type such as many gate, plug, and ball valves, the test pressure shall be applied successively to each end of the closed valve and leakage to the opposite end checked. 5.2.1 Asalterate methods for valves with independent double seating (such as double dise or spi wedge gate valves), at the option of the manufacturer, the pressure may be applied inside the bonnet (or body) of the closed valve and each seat checked for leakage at the valve ports, of the pressure may be applied to the valve ports and the sum of seat leakage checked at the bonnet (or body) These alternate methods may be used at the option of the manufacturer for valves with single dises (such | as solid or flexible-wedge gate valves) provided a supplementary closure member test across the disc is. | performed 5.3. For other valve types, the test pressure shall be applied across the closure member in the direction producing the most adverse seating condition, For example, a globe valve shall be tested with pressure under the dise. A check valve or other valve type that is designed, sold, and marked as a one-way valve, requires a closure test only in the appropriate direction, A stop check valve requires both tests.MSS STANDARD PRACTICE S 5.4. Valves conforming to this Standard Practice in all respects, except those that are designed for operating conditions that have pressure differential across the closure member limited to pressures less than the 100 °F (38 °C) pressure rating and having closure members and/or actuating devices (direct, mechanical, fluid, or electrical) that would be subject to damage at higher differential pressures, shall be tested as described above except that the closure test requirement may be reduced to 1.1 times the maximum specified closed position differential pressure. This exception may be exercised upon agreement between the purchaser and manufacturer. The manufacturer's name plate data shall include reference to any such limitations 5.5. Valves of single or symmetrical seat design that are capable of seating in two directions, e.z., | butterfly or weir-type diaphragm valves, require seat testing in only one direction. 5.6 Butterfly valves of the offset stem-seat design may be closure tested in only one direction. The manufacturer shall be able to demonstrate that the direction selected is that least likely to attain effective tightness 5.7. Allowable leakage rates, except for the conditions of Sections 5.7.2 and 5.7.3, shall be as indicated in Section 5.7.1 5.7.1 The maximum allowable leakage of each seat closure shall be 10 mV/hr of liquid or 0.1 standard | cubic fi/hr of gas per unit of NPS, or, 0.4 ml/hr of liquid or 120 standard ml/hr of gas per unit of DN, | under the specified test condition. See Table 4 5.1.2 In the case of valves having pressure or flow reversal actuated closure, e.g., check valves, the allowable leakage rate may be increased by a factor of four (4). | 5.7.3 In the case of valves having a seat closure member that uses a resilient material, e.g., plastic or | clastomer, for fluid sealing at closure, there shall be no visible leakage for the duration of the seat test. 5.8. The duration of each seat closure test shall be per Table 3.MSS STANDARD PRACTICE TABLE 3 Seat Closure Test Duration Valve Size Test Time NPS DN Seconds and Smaller | $0.and Smaller | 15 65-200 30 10-18 250 ~450 60 20 and Larger | 500 and Larger | __120 TABLE 4 Units of Leakage per NPS/DN Liquid Gas Per NPS Per DN Per NPS Per DN 0.1 SCH i 7 10 ce/hr 0.4 ceshr er 120 ce/hr 0.167 ccimin, | 6.6 x10° ce/min, | 47.2 ec/min, 2ec/min, 2.66" drops/min, | 0.11° dropsimin. | 1180" bubble/min. | 50 bubble/min, NOTES: (@) For information only. Based on 16 drops per cc, which is the equivalent of a spherical shaped drop having an approximate diameter of 3/16 inch (0.5 em). (b) For information only. Based on 25 bubbles per ce, which is the equivalent of a spherical shaped bubble having an approximate diameter of 5/32 inch (0.4 cm). See 1 Section 2.4, Note (1). ‘GENERAL NOTES: | 1.1 m= 1 cc (For information: Small liquid leak rates are typically measured in“mt” and 2. SCFH = Standaed cubic fet per hour (14.7 psia @ 60°F) (1.01 bar @ 16°C) 3. SCIM = Standard eubie inch per minute (14.7 psia @ 60°F) (1.01 bar @ 16°C) within the U.S.)STANDARD PRACTICE This Page Intentionally Left Blank Manufacturers Standardization Society of the Valve and Fittings Industry SP-61,MSS STANDARD PRACTICE | ANNEX A | Referenced Standards and Applicable Dates ‘This Annex is an integral part of this Standard Practice and is placed after the main text for convenience. ASME: ANSUASME B16.34-2017 Valves ~ Flanged, Threaded, and Welding End CK: ANSI/FCI 0-2-2013 Control Valve Seat Leakage ISA: ANSU/ISA 75.19.01-2013 Hydrostatic Testing of Control Valves ‘The following organizations appear on the above list: ANSI American National Standards Institute, Ine. 25 West 43" Street, Fourth Floor New York, NY 10036-7406 ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME International) Two Park Avenue New York, NY 10016-5990-5990 FCI Fluid Controls Institute 1300 Sumner Avenue Cleveland, OH 44115-2851 ISA International Society of Automation 67 TW. Alexander Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2277STANDARD PRACTICE This Page Intentionally Left Blank Manufacturers Standardization Society of the Valve and Fittings Industry SP-61,Purchase or View a Full Listing of MSS Standards at: http://msshq.org/Store/PriceList.cfm MSS Standard Practices (SPs) related to or reference ANSIMSS SP-25, ANSI/MSS SP-96 ‘American National ANSUUMSS SP-25, ANSUMSS SP-44 ANSUUMSS SP-S5 ANSI/MSS SP-58 ANSI/MSS SP-96 ANSUMSS SP-114 ANSUMSS SP-122 ANSU/MSS SP-134 ANSUMSS SP-135 ANSUMSS SP-138 ANSU/MSS SP-144 All Standard Pi OD TechDoc this pul nm: ‘Standard Marking System for Valves, Fitings, Flanges, and Unions Terminology for Valves, Fittings, and Their Related Components Standards Published by MSS, an ANSI-accredited Standards Developer: Standard Marking System for Valves, Fittings, Flanges, and Unions ‘Steel Pipeline Flanges ‘Quality Standard for Steel Castings for Valves, Flanges, Fittings, and Other Piping Components — Visual Method for Evaluation of Surface Irregularities Pipe Hangers and Supports — Materials, Design, Manufacture, Selection, Application, and Installation Terminology for Valves, Fitings, and Their Related Components Corrosion Resistant Pipe Fitings Threaded and Socket Welding Class 150 and 1000 Plastic Industrial Ball Valves Valves for Cryogenic Service, including Requirements for Body/Bonnet Extensions High Pressure Knife Gate Valves Quality Standard Practice for Oxygen Cleaning of Valves and Fittings Pressure Seal Bonnet Vatves Do not violate copyright laws ractices are officially available only from MSS and through our authorized dist tors: TECHSTREET SAIGLOBAL (ansi_ _ affor normdocs dy About MSS ‘The Manufacturers Standardization Society (MSS) ofthe Valve and Fittings Industry isa non-profit technical association organized for development and improvement of industry, national and international codes and standards for Valves, Valve Actuators, Valve Mod ications, Pipe Fi fngs, Flanges, Pipe Hangers and Supports, and Associated Seals, Since its establishment in 1924, MSS has bbeen dedicated to developing standards for national and global applications, in cooperation with other standardizing bodies and regulatory authorities. MSS is an American National Standards Institute (ANSI)-accredited standards developer. For more information on membership and eligibility requirements, visit: itp:/imsshg org/Store/Membership.efin Manufacturers Standardization Society of the Valve and Fittings Industry, Inc. 127 Park Street, NE, Vienna, VA 22180-4620 + Phone (703) 281-6613 + Fax (703) 281-6671 ‘The shnical Voice of the Industry”