Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Harmonizacao de Carreta Cavalo
Harmonizacao de Carreta Cavalo
Harmonisation
COURSE
Table of contents
Table of contents
1 General information.......................................................................................................................................... 4
2 Safety information............................................................................................................................................. 6
3 Why truck/trailer harmonisation?.................................................................................................................... 7
4 Ideal braking force distribution....................................................................................................................... 9
5 Truck/trailer harmonisation basics................................................................................................................ 11
6 Basics: the Compatibility Brake Bands........................................................................................................ 12
7 Carrying out the performance test................................................................................................................ 14
8 Data sheet and measurement protocol Truck/trailer harmonisation......................................................... 15
9 Compatibility braking bands.......................................................................................................................... 17
10 Further test options........................................................................................................................................ 19
11 Analysis of the deceleration curves.............................................................................................................. 20
12 Influence of the response behaviour............................................................................................................ 23
13 Response pressure test................................................................................................................................. 24
14 Corrections for conventional braking systems............................................................................................ 27
15 Example for braking systems in towing vehicle and trailer........................................................................ 28
16 Setting options for conventional braking systems...................................................................................... 30
16.1 Adapter/check valve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
16.2 LSV functional test. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
17 Trailer EBS....................................................................................................................................................... 34
17.1 Special functions in trailer EBS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
17.2 Adjustments for trailers with WABCO EBS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
17.3 Adjusting the response pressure in the case of T-EBS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
17.4 Setting a predominance with T-EBS C/D. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
17.5 Setting a predominance with T-EBS E. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
18 Towing vehicle with EBS................................................................................................................................ 42
18.1 The benefits of EBS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
18.2 Automatic truck/trailer harmonisation with EBS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
18.3 Coupling force control in the towing vehicle EBS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
18.4 Test on towing vehicle with EBS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
18.5 Basic values of the vehicle manufacturer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
18.6 Measuring the brake temperatures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
19 Worksheets truck/trailer harmonisation as copy templates....................................................................... 52
20 Checklist for workshop.................................................................................................................................. 60
Edition 2 (8.2018)
This publication is not subject to an updating service.
You will find the current version at:
http://www.wabco.info/i/819
3
General information
1 General information
Target group of this publication
––Action step
@ ÖÖ Consequence of an action
List
WABCO Academy
www www
https://www.wabco-academy.com/home/
@
@ @ @
@ @ @
4
General information
Head office:
WABCO Europe BVBA, Chaussée de la Hulpe 166, 1170 Brussels, Belgium, T: +32 2 663 9800
5
Safety information
2 Safety information
Please note the following in relation to the subject of safety during the course:
Smoking prohibited
Smoking is prohibited in the training rooms as well as the entire workshop
area!
Please note smoking zones during breaks.
Fire extinguisher
Look where the next fire extinguisher is located.
Read the operating instructions on the device.
Call the relevant emergency number in the event of fire (in Germany: 112)
Escape routes
Escape routes in the workshops are marked by signs.
Note these signs.
Escape routes must not be blocked by vehicles or objects.
First Aid
Everybody is obliged to provide FIRST AID. Every injury must be reported to
the trainer immediately.
Call the relevant emergency number in the event of an accident (in
Germany: 112)
Hazardous waste
Cleaning cloths and the like must be put into the container provided for this
purpose.
Leaked petrol, oil or similar substances must be removed immediately using
a binding agent!
6
Why truck/trailer harmonisation?
Effect of the braking force An optimal braking force distribution between a vehicle’s front and rear axle
distribution in a truck/trailer as well as the braking force distribution between towing vehicle and trailer
combination or semitrailer: particularly affect:
wear performance
optimisation of braking and driving comfort
increased road safety
Problems in practice: Although new vehicles with ABS only need to satisfy the compatibility band
when fully laden, vehicle manufacturers aim for good compatibility in all load
states. As far as is technically possible, the aim is to reach a central position
in the compatibility band. Even with frequently changing combinations this
position generally attains a satisfactory average wear performance for all
vehicles involved. The combination also exhibits a well-balanced braking
behaviour even during intense decelerations.
In practice, however, complaints about the truck/trailer compatibility continue
to be an issue. These are above all provoked by greatly disparate or
premature brake lining wear.
All components that contribute to generating the brake effect influence the braking force
distribution. Early brake lining wear on a vehicle is particularly affected by this.
In vehicles with disk brakes, the failure to balance the brakes correctly can result in costly
damage. The reason for this is the considerable difference in behaviour when the installed
wheel brakes heat up.
7
Why truck/trailer harmonisation?
Different temperature behaviour of Drum brakes have a normal temperature range from approx. 100 °C to
drum and disk brakes: 200 °C. At temperatures from around 300 °C to 350 °C the brake effect of
drum brakes diminishes considerably (temperature fading). This behaviour
is caused by the brake drum expanding with increasing temperatures and
moving away from the brake linings. This makes greater brake cylinder
strokes necessary.
The phenomenon of temperature fading does not occur with disk brakes.
Their operating temperatures can be considerably higher, generally between
200 °C and 350 °C. Virtually no brake fading is noticeable, even when the
temperature rises to 600 °C or 700 °C. This can be explained by the fact
that the brake disks and brake linings grow towards one another and thus
behave in the exact opposite way to drum brakes.
But the lining wear also increases significantly as the brakes heat up.
Even minor discrepancies in the compressed air system, such as braking
pressures that are too high for example, contribute to such high brake
temperatures.
As a result of these temperature increases the brake lining wear on the
entire vehicle also increases.
Other factors, like the manner of driving that often changes when disk
brakes are installed, and features of the towing vehicle (e.g. with or without
retarder) also need to be taken into account however.
Special characteristics with EBS The EBS of the towing vehicle detects the braking behaviour of the trailer
towing vehicles: and automatically adjusts the braking forces accordingly. Theoretically, each
vehicle unit thus brakes its own portion of mass.
The corresponding dynamic behaviour of the truck/trailer combination,
however, cannot be reproduced on a roller test stand. See also following
chapters.
Conclusion Even the few points above should make the importance of harmonisation
clear. Truck/trailer harmonisation must therefore not be seen as an
unnecessary effort and should be a standard procedure in the workshop
routine.
The failure to carry out this harmonisation may cause damage as a direct
result and not as a result of any defects on the components.
When is it necessary to carry out a The truck/trailer combination must be harmonised if the braking forces are
truck/trailer harmonisation? not evenly distributed to the towing vehicle and its trailer or, in the case of
single vehicles, to its axles. This usually becomes apparent when brake
lining wear is uneven in the combination of towing and towed unit, if the
trailer runs up to the towing vehicle, or if there is a tendency to lock on
individual axles.
8
Ideal braking force distribution
FV
FH FD FD
-a FH
g = tan α FD = 0
FV
1 2 3
α α α ∑ 1, 2, 3 α α α α
Ideal deceleration: ןൌ ൌ ܼǢ ן on all axles
ௌ௨௧௩ᇱ௦௦
Deceleration z in % =
்௦௧௪௧௧௩
ܨ
ݖൌ ൈ ͳͲͲ
ܩ
்௧
Deceleration ܼ ൌ ൌ ܨ ൊ ܩ
௧௦௧௪௧
9
Ideal braking force distribution
Simply put, this correlation means: The braking force distribution is ideal when the decelerations of the separate
vehicles of a combination are equal, i.e. each vehicle in the combination
decelerates its own dynamic portion of mass in accordance with the driver’s
request.
Idealinto
Taking deceleration:
account the ןൌ for
definition ൌ the
ܼǢ ן on all axles
deceleration:
ௌ௨௧௩ᇱ௦௦
Deceleration z in % =
்௦௧௪௧௧௩
ܨ
means a harmonised braking behaviour because ݖൌboth
vehicles
ൈ ͳͲͲ (towing
ܩ braking. For us this
vehicle and trailer) have the same deceleration (z) when
means:
ܨൌ ݖൈ ܩ
F / Gp (towing vehicle) = F / Gp (trailer)
்௧
What does this mean for testing? Deceleration
Derived from the ܼ ൌ
equation ൌ ܨ ൊforces
F / m = a, the braking ܩ (F) and the weights
௧௦௧௪௧
(m) must be determined on both vehicles at corresponding pressures on
the yellow coupling head. The values must be compared according to the
formula.
F = z . Gp
10
Truck/trailer harmonisation basics
Basic Requirements for The prerequisite for successful truck/trailer harmonisation is the perfect
Synchronizing a Tractor-Trailer condition of all the braking system components. New or newly lined wheel
Combination: brakes (linings and drums/disks) must be run in at least around 3,000 to
5,000 km beforehand.
If unsatisfactory braking performance or wear behaviour is perceived
during operation, the wheel brake should be visually inspected by the
workshop and the function and setting of the entire air brake system should
be checked prior to the performance test on the roller test stand or before
making any changes to the air brake system.
11
Basics: the Compatibility Brake Bands
70
60 A B
50
40
30
20
10
0
0,2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
pm (bar)
z = deceleration in %
pm = pressure at the coupling head "brake" in bar
A = compatibility band for "vehicle unladen"
B = compatibility band for "vehicles laden"
12
Basics: the Compatibility Brake Bands
Objective of proper harmonisation: When the braking characteristics of the towing vehicle and its trailer are
as close to each other as possible within the compatibility braking band,
problems with brake lining wear caused by unfavourable reciprocal effects
between the parts of the combination are virtually impossible.
If the braking characteristics of the vehicles are also close to the centre
of the applicable compatibility band, all the vehicles that have been
harmonised accordingly can be interchanged amongst one another without
brake lining wear problems being likely to occur.
Special points with semitrailers: For the tractor unit and the semitrailer, separate compatibility braking bands
apply. They take into account the dynamic behaviour during operation
since (other than in the conventional truck/trailer combination) it involves a
dynamic axle load transfer from the semitrailer to its tractor.
However, since this axle load transfer depends on the length and the height
of the point of gravity of the respective semitrailer, the EC directive defines
braking bands for the respective semitrailer type, applying correction factors
to be calculated from what is known as the basic band. The unadjusted
basic band can be used to assess the semitrailer only if it is laden.
70
U
60
50 V
40
30
20
10
0
0,2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
pm (bar)
z = deceleration in %
pm = pressure at the coupling head "brake" in bar
U = compatibility band "semitrailer-tractor laden"
V = compatibility band "semitrailer laden"
13
Carrying out the performance test
்௧
Deceleration ܼ ൌ ൌ ܨ ൊ ܩ
௧௦௧௪௧
are calculated and entered in the test sheet for each vehicle.
Evaluation of the measured values: The values determined for deceleration "z" from the test sheet are
transferred to the corresponding compatibility braking diagram and
analysed.
Of particular interest is the range between 0.5 and 2.5 bar in which approx.
90% of all braking operations take place. Panic braking at higher pressures
is so rare that it is not relevant in terms of wear.
Typical defects: The most frequent causes for complaints we have identified are:
defects on the wheel brakes (stiff cams, flats in the cam lobe, worn-out
camshaft bearings, burnt-out release springs),
defective brake linings, use of unauthorised cheap brake linings or
imitation brake drums of doubtful quality,
wrong settings for the automatic load-dependent braking force control
system LSV.
changing the settings
Changes to the air brake system Any adjustments of the settings for the air braking system must be kept to
settings: within the permissible tolerances. Any changes beyond these require the
vehicle manufacturer’s approval.
When making adjustments, it is vital that the legal provisions are adhered to.
14
Data sheet and measurement protocol Truck/trailer harmonisation
Manufacturer:............................ Type:.........................................
Manufacturer:............................ Type:.........................................
Semitrailer
Central axle trailer Predominance trailer brake valve:
Number of axles:
pin = 2.0 bar pout = ...................................bar
(test port on port 2 of the trailer brake
(coupling head "brake")
valve)
15
16
pm
Towing vehicle Test weight: ______________kg Towed vehicle Test weight: ______________kg
1st axle 2nd axle 3rd axle Total 1st axle 2nd axle 3rd axle Total
P1 F1 P2 F2 P3 F3 FB z pm P1 F1 P2 F2 P3 F3 FB z
(bar) le (daN) ri (bar) le (daN) ri (bar) le (daN) ri (daN) (%) (bar) (bar) le (daN) ri (bar) le (daN) ri (bar) le (daN) ri (daN) (%)
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
4.0
DatasheetandmeasurementprotocolTruck/trailerharmonisation
5.0
ൌ ܼǢ ן on all axles
6.5
௧௩ᇱ௦௦
்௦௧௪௧௧௩
P1-3 = pressure applied into the brake cylinders in bar z = deceleration of the vehicle in %
F1-3 = sum of the braking forces on the axle in daN FB = sum of the braking forces in daN
Formula: pm = pressure at the coupling head Brake in bar Gp = test weight of the vehicle in kg
ܨ
ݖൌ ൈ ͳͲͲ
ܩ
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0,2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7,5 8
17
Compatibility braking bands
z = deceleration in %
100
90
80
70
U
60
V
50
40
30
20
10
0
0,2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7,5 8
Required deceleration for the quick For towing vehicles (without EBS) as well as drawbar and central axle
test: trailers, a pressure of 1.7 bar must be applied at the yellow coupling head
for this purpose and 1.9 bar in the case of semitrailers. Here a vehicle
deceleration of approx. 10 % (+/- 2 %) should be reached.
If the achieved deceleration is significantly below or above 10 %, an
intensive test of the braking system with determination of the position in the
compatibility brake band is recommended.
Temperature measurement: Another method that quickly indicates a tendency without providing
exhaustive evidence is to measure and compare the temperature at brake
disks or drums on tractor/trailer combinations. This method is particularly
helpful when testing tractor/trailer combinations with EBS in the towing
vehicle, because in this case a static test on the roller test stand does not
provide information about the dynamic behaviour. Further information is
found in the chapter "Towing vehicle with EBS".
For the temperature measurement, the complete combination should first
be driven (ideally by the usual driver of this combination) over a normal
distance and immediately afterwards the temperatures on the brake disks
or drums are measured. A comparison of the temperatures identified on
each axle can indicate a tendency of towing vehicle or trailer to be over- or
underutilised.
Infrared temperature measurement devices, for example, are suitable for measuring the
temperature on brake disks or drums because they enable a contactless procedure.
Possible differences due to different wheel brake types or sizes must be taken into
account when measuring the temperature. A 19 inch wheel brake in a trailer, for instance,
will inevitably have a higher temperature than a 22 inch brake in the towing vehicle while
delivering the same braking power, and this does not indicate a poor harmonisation. Also see
chapter 18.6
19
Analysis of the deceleration curves
Too high in upper section load-sensing output pressure too high (see LSV plate)
Too high in lower section faulty empty-load valve or adapter valve (see LSV plate)
Too low overall predominance in trailer control valve (towing vehicle) is too high
Too high overall predominance in trailer control valve (towing vehicle) is too low
2. Trailer
PATH OF THE DECELERATION CURVE POSSIBLE CAUSES
Too high in lower section opening pressure of adapter valve is too low
Too low overall predominance in relay emergency valve (trailer) is too low
Too high overall predominance in relay emergency valve (trailer) is too high
20
Analysis of the deceleration curves
Example 1
The path of this deceleration curve is too flat. The braking performance
of this vehicle is therefore insufficient. From around 2 bar at the yellow
coupling head there is a noticeable drop in braking force.
A possible cause for this might be one or several LSV controllers
that are set too low. Changing the predominance is not expedient in
this case, because this would only displace the deceleration curve in
parallel without influencing the gradient.
Example 2
This deceleration curve proceeds too steep and leaves the compatibility
band in upward direction. The curve position could indicate that:
the friction value at the brake linings is too high (aggressive braking),
or
the installed wheels are too small, or
the brake cylinders are too large, or
the brake levers are too long (impermissible force increase) etc.
Example 3
This curve begins with a good response pressure range, but its
curvature leaves the compatibility band in downward direction.
The curvature indicates poor mechanical efficiency (stiff movement of
brake shaft, rollers, bearings, ...)
21
Analysis of the deceleration curves
Example 4
Example 5
Example 6
The gradient of the braking force curve is too flat. The curve position
either indicates a poor friction value at the brake linings (glazed or
greasy brake linings),
or that the installed wheels are too large, or the brake cylinders are too
small or the brake levers are too short (loss of force) etc.
22
Influence of the response behaviour
Fig. 1 Fig. 1 shows a towing vehicle with a response pressure of 0.5 bar and a
trailer with a response pressure of 0.8 bar. Both vehicles have the same
deceleration at the calculated pressure of 6.5 bar.
Semitrailer vehicle laden
In the partial braking range at pm = 1.2 bar, however, the different
Semitrailer laden response pressures cause the trailer to under-brake relative to the towing
vehicle by 50 % even though both vehicles are in the compatibility band.
Here the towing vehicle must take on a substantial portion of the braking
work in the partial braking range, with obvious consequences for the wear
behaviour.
Towing vehicle
Trailer
Fig. 2 In Fig. 2, on the other hand, shows two vehicles with equal brake
response pressures but with different brake designs.
At pm = 6.5 bar the towing vehicle has a deceleration of 0.63 and the
Semitrailer vehicle laden
semitrailer 0.50.
Semitrailer laden
The difference in braking force in the partial braking range at pm =
1.2 bar, however, is only 23 %, because the brakes of both vehicles are
applied evenly.
The worst case is reached when the trailer also has a high response
pressure.
These two examples demonstrate that wear problems are caused not
so much by different characteristic curve gradients of the respective
Towing vehicle individual vehicles within the compatibility band, but primarily by the
differences in response pressure being too great.
Trailer
Problems with different types Other problems can be caused if towing vehicle and trailer are equipped
of wheel brakes: with different brakes. Towing vehicles are increasingly equipped with disk
brakes while many trailers are still equipped with drum brakes.
However, because disk brakes exhibit less thermal fading than drum
brakes, their braking force diminishes to a much lesser degree at high
temperatures. Where prolonged braking occurs, the braking energy is
then increasingly transferred from the trailer with drum brakes to the
towing vehicle with disk brakes.
23
Response pressure test
Practical execution of the response 1. Connect a pressure test gauge to the coupling head (yellow) to measure
pressure test: pm.
2. Lift each wheel in turn with the jack or pit jack.
3. Turn it by hand while applying pressure to the yellow coupling head
(KK brake). For this purpose you can either use the foot brake valve on
the towing vehicle or a trailer test device.
4. Record the pm pressure at which the individual wheels start to brake
5. (can no longer be turned).
Effective, simultaneous response of towing vehicle and trailer brake is the case when the
measured response pressures are equal on all axles of the truck/trailer combination.
Using the brake test stand the Alternatively, you can also use the brake test stand for this purpose.
response pressure measurement: Determine the pm pressure (measured at the yellow coupling head) at
which the wheel brakes of the tested axle start to brake (this means at
which pressure on the coupling head the braking force indicates an increase
beyond the rolling resistance).
In this case also record the pm pressure at which the different wheels start
to brake.
If the test stand is equipped with a printer, the printout of the braking force
curve can also be used for evaluation.
24
Response pressure test
Example 1 The response pressures measured at the coupling head "brake" (pm pressure) are
determined and recorded. For this example, the result is as follows:
0.5 bar 0.7 bar 1.0 bar 1.0 bar 1.0 bar
Evaluation of the The response pressures of the trailer brakes are significantly higher than those of the
measurement towing vehicle axles. In this case an improvement could be achieved by means of
adjusting the predominance in the trailer brake valve, for example.
If the predominance is increased by 0.3 bar, the brake cylinder pressure increases
by 0.3 bar relative to the pressure on the coupling head "brake" (pm). This means,
the trailer will now also start braking at pm = 0.7 bar.
Example 1 after The response pressures measured at the coupling head "brake" (pm pressure) are
correction determined and recorded again:
0.5 bar 0.7 bar 0.7 bar 0.7 bar 0.7 bar
Result of the The response pressures of the towing vehicle and the trailer now lie close together.
correction One can now assume a uniform start of braking over the entire truck/trailer
combination.
With identical types of wheel brakes this already provides a vital precondition for
harmonising wear.
25
Response pressure test
Example 2 The response pressures measured at the coupling head "brake" (pm pressure) are
determined and recorded. For this example, the result is as follows:
0.9 bar 1.0 bar 0.7 bar 0.7 bar 0.7 bar
Evaluation of the The result shows that the trailer starts to brake first. This means that between
measurement 0.7 bar and 1.0 bar - where the drive axles only just reach their response pressure
- the main brake work for the combination is assumed by the trailer brakes. The
driver may rate this situation as comfortable because the combination brakes nicely
"stretched". However, he generally does not recognise the threat of damage to the
trailer brake linings.
In this case, optimisation may be achieved by reducing any predominance set in
the towing vehicle’s trailer control valve. Without changing the towing vehicle axles’
start of braking, the pm pressure measured at the yellow coupling head of the towing
vehicle at the start of braking would be reduced accordingly.
Example 2 after The response pressures measured at the coupling head "brake" (pm pressure) are
correction determined and recorded again:
0.6 bar 0.7 bar 0.7 bar 0.7 bar 0.7 bar
Result of the The response pressures of the towing vehicle and the trailer now lie close together.
correction One can now assume a uniform start of braking over the entire truck/trailer
combination.
26
Corrections for conventional braking systems
Predominance in the trailer control In towing vehicles as well as trailers the vehicle manufacturer may have
valve or trailer brake valve: provided the option of an adjustable pressure predominance or may
even have defined such a predominance. In the towing vehicle this is
implemented by means of the trailer control valve and in the trailer with the
trailer brake valve.
By setting an optional predominance, the vehicle manufacturer can
influence the position in the compatibility band in accordance with the brake
calculation for the respective vehicle / vehicle type relative to the pressure at
the coupling head "brake".
Increasing or decreasing the predominance will only displace the
deceleration curve in parallel, however. It is not possible to change the pitch
angle by means of adjusting the predominance!
Adapter/check valve: Another option to adjust the pressure in trailers is provided when an adapter
valve (frequently also called check valve) is installed on certain axles. This
valve can be used to influence the braking force portion of individual axles in
relation to the deceleration of the vehicle as a whole and thus also the wear
behaviour of the different axle relative to one another.
LSV controller: Another option in this respect is the utilisation of permissible tolerances
(generally +/- 0.2 to 0.3 bar) when setting the LSV controller. This can
influence the gradient of the vehicle’s deceleration curve if it leaves the band
without other causes being apparent.
Attention: Changing the settings on devices of the air braking system should only be
carried out by trained and qualified personnel. The vehicle manufacturer’s
specifications must be adhered to in this respect so that neither road safety
nor any warranty or goodwill claims are put at risk.
27
Example for braking systems in towing vehicle and trailer
18
13
RETARDER
9 10
22
MOTOR 19 22
17 17
8 20
22
22
9 10
28
Example for braking systems in towing vehicle and trailer
5 14 14
1 12 13 13
7 10 15
2 4
6
3
12 13 13
14 14
Drawbar trailer
5 14 13
14 12
1
7 7
11
8 9 10
2 4
6
3
12 14 13
14
29
Setting options for conventional braking systems
11
12
43
Predominance in the trailer brake Many trailer brake valves for conventional braking systems are equipped
valve (trailer): with adjustable predominance to influence the band position in the
compatibility bands.
30
Setting options for conventional braking systems
Adapter/check valve: An adapter valve (frequently also called check valve) is mainly used in
drawbar trailers on the front axle and retains the applied braking pressure
within the setting range from 0.3 to 1.1 bar.
In the partial braking position, this causes the larger brake cylinders on
the trailer’s front axle to receive, in keeping with the lesser axle weight
transfer, less pressure than the smaller brake cylinders on the rear axle.
The objective here is to attain reasonably equal braking forces at rear and
front axle - despite the different brake cylinder sizes - on drawbar trailers at
decelerations of z = 6 %. The valve also has a quick-release function when
the brake is released.
Sometimes an adapter valve is also used in semitrailers with disk brakes
and EBS in order to adapt the response pressure of the disk brakes with
EBS to the behaviour of the drum brakes (e.g. in the case of BPW axles).
Adapter valves are supplied with different factory settings. The valves can
be set to any value between 0.3 and 1.1 bar.
During partial braking with low pressure, the pressure flowing to the larger
brake cylinders on the front axle reaches port (1) of the control valve. The
pressure building up on the diaphragm (5) is not capable of pressurizing
1 ports (2) since the preset force of the spring (8), via the piston (6), does
not allow the outer edge of the diaphragm (5) to rise. This retention can be
defined, in accordance with the preset tension of the spring (8) by adjusting
5 the screw adjusting screw (10), between 0.3 and 1.1 bar.
If the control pressure in port (1) continues to rise above the diaphragm (5),
6 the build-up of compressed air is greater than the force of the spring (8), and
the piston (6) moves downwards. Via the outer edge of the diaphragm (5),
2 2
the compressed air flows to ports (2). When port (1) is fully pressurized, the
8 piston (6) rests on the housing.
6
2 2
10
31
Setting options for conventional braking systems
General instructions for testing the The LSV plate attached by the manufacturer is authoritative for testing
LSV settings: the automatic load-dependent braking force distribution (LSV).
LSV linkages and levers must be properly installed and all joints must be
free of clearances.
The vehicle-specific values, such as input pressure upstream of the LSV
controller, output pressures at front and rear axle, suspension path s on the
lever of the load-sensing valve or air suspension bellows pressure unladen
and laden, must be read from the LSV plate and recorded.
Connect one test pressure gauge respectively to the test ports up- and
downstream of the LSV controller. If the front axle of the towing vehicle is
included in load-dependent control, connect an additional pressure gauge to
the brake cylinder of the front axle.
No-load test with leaf-spring Fill braking system up to cut-off pressure and apply input pressure upstream
suspension: of the load-sensing valve in accordance with the LSV plate.
Note: Do not press the brake pedal down to the stop position during the
LSV test, because in full-braking position joint control of the FA axle is
suspended.
The braking pressure at the rear axle (and the front axle if applicable) must
match the output pressure stated on the LSV plate for the corresponding
rear axle load. Pressure deviations of max. 0.3 bar are permissible for
air braking systems or 5 bar for hydraulic systems. For greater pressure
deviations, the LSV setting must be corrected.
Full-load test with leaf-spring After the brake is released (particularly important in the case of static
suspension: LSV valves), the lever of the load-sensing valve must be unhooked and
positioned upwards from the previous unladen value on the lever by the
distance specified on the LSV plate and arrested there.
Re-apply the input pressure upstream of the LSV valve in accordance with
the LSV plate.
The attained braking pressure must match the specified output pressure for
the highest axle load according to the LSV plate.
Note: If the specified setting values according to the LSV plate are not
reached, first compare the installed rear axle spring, load-sensing valve
and lever length with the LSV plate for correctness. Only then does it make
sense to look for faults in the braking system.
Finally, attach the linkage and remove the test pressure gauges.
32
Setting options for conventional braking systems
No-load test with air suspension: Connect pressure gauges to the left and right air bellows test port of the rear
axle or the trailer axles, measure air bellows pressure and compare with the
values on the LSV plate. Left and right value must be approximately equal
with even load distribution and correspond with the axle load table on the
LSV plate. Otherwise the air suspension must be repaired by the workshop.
Connect test hose with precision control valve or LSV test equipment to the
test valve of the load-sensing valve for infinitely variable application of the
control pressure (bellows pressure) for the LSV test. Apply bellows pressure
"unladen" in accordance with the LSV plate.
Fill braking system up to cut-off pressure and apply input pressure upstream
of the load-sensing valve in accordance with the LSV plate.
Note: During the LSV test, do not press the brake pedal down to the stop
position, because for towing vehicles with joint load-dependent control of the
front axle control of the front axle is suspended in the event of full braking.
The braking pressure at the rear axle (and the front axle if applicable) must
match the output pressure stated on the LSV plate for the corresponding
rear axle load.
Pressure deviations of max. 0.3 bar are permissible for air braking systems.
Full-load test with air suspension: After releasing the brake (particularly important with static LSV valves),
apply the "laden" bellows pressure in accordance with the LSV plate on the
test valve of the LSV controller using a precision control valve or LSV test
device.
Re-apply the input pressure upstream of the LSV valve in accordance with
the LSV plate and make sure there is sufficient supply pressure.
The attained braking pressure must match the specified output pressure for
the highest axle load according to the LSV plate.
Note: If deviations exceed 0.3 bar, the LSV control system must be adjusted
or repaired by the workshop.
Remove precision controllers on the test valve and test pressure gauges.
33
Trailer EBS
17 Trailer EBS
Semitrailer
8
5 7 5 7
6
1
2
6 3 7 7
5 5
Drawbar trailer
8 5
1 5 6 7
5 6 4 7
5
34
Trailer EBS
System description: The EBS standard system for a 3-axle semitrailer is shown in Fig. 1. It
controls the braking pressures electronically for each side separately. The
system consists of a dual-circuit compact trailer modulator with digital data
interface according to ISO 1199-2 to the EBS towing vehicle, an EBS trailer
brake valve, an axle load sensor and the ABS sensors. The application
in drawbar or semitrailers with steering axle requires a system with an
additional EBS relay valve on the steering axles (see Fig. 2).
Park release emergency valve As a further development, WABCO supplies the new park release
(PREV): emergency valve (PREV) since 2003. This newly developed braking
device combines the functions of a double release valve with those of a
conventional trailer brake valve. Emergency braking, ABS and RSS remain
functional if the supply line via the BBA (service brake system) breaks off.
The trailer is always automatically braked when unhitched. Even if there is
a total air loss in the tank when the vehicle is parked, the trailer will always
be prevented from rolling away because the spring-type brake actuators
automatically engage in this case.
Omission of the conventional One great benefit of EBS is the lack of an LSV controller and its mechanical
valves: setting. Instead, setting the LSV functions is replaced by the parameter
setting of the EBS modulator. All functions of the LSV controller(s) are
secured by the EBS ECU. In a drawbar trailer, the software-based braking
force distribution has even replaced the two standard LSV controllers, the
adapter valve on the front axle and the pressure limiting valve on the rear
axle. The external setting options on the brake valves are therefore no
longer available and any pressure adjustments must be implemented via the
EBS modulator parameters using diagnostic software.
Behaviour when the EBS fails: In trailers with EBS, a lit warning lamp in the driver’s cabin indicates not only
a failure of ABS, but also signals to the user a failure of the load-dependent
braking force control (LSV). This means that the trailer is always braked like
a fully laden trailer. Due to this additional load on the trailer’s brake, there is
no longer and truck/trailer harmonisation.
Particularly in trailers with disk brakes, the failure of EBS will lead to early
wear of the brake. Overheating of the brake can occur due to the brake
harmonisation no longer being provided.
35
Trailer EBS
Notes for testing: With the WABCO Trailer EBS, there are a number of functions that may
be relevant to the safety test and should be known to the tester:
Standstill function: When the vehicle is at a standstill (v < 1.8 km/h) and the pneumatic
control pressure is greater than 3.5 bar, the system changes over from
electro-pneumatic to pneumatic pressure modulation (backup operation)
after 5 seconds. This means that the LSV function (even with an unladen
vehicle) is set to full load by this changeover. This function is used to avoid
unnecessary current consumption when the vehicle is parked with the
parking brake applied and the drive switch actuated. It is deactivated again
with the start of driving.
Test mode: In order to test the braking pressure distribution while stationary (LSV
function) and the wheel brake performance, the electronic braking system
must be put into test mode. This switches off the standstill function and the
emergency braking function described above.
For test mode to be activated, the ignition must be switched on when the
control line is vented (service brake system and parking brake system are
not applied). In this mode the LSV can be checked in relation to the coupling
head pressure and the current axle load or the current bellows pressure.
For drawbar trailers, pressure control is here carried out at the steering axle
in accordance with the bellows pressure of the main axle (rear axle) (no
dedicated pressure sensor at the steering axle).
Simulation of the laden status: If the axle load sensor is installed with a test valve (WABCO
recommendation), the load status can be simulated as with pneumatic LSV
controllers.
By venting the air suspension bellows below 0.2 bar (D generation) or
pulling the axle load sensor connector (C generation), the "laden" status can
be simulated even for an unladen vehicle so that the full braking pressure
can be applied.
Important note: In the latter case the warning lamp is activated and a current fault is
stored! Once the test has been completed, the axle load sensor must
be reconnected and the current faults in the ECU must be deleted by
interrupting the power supply (ignition off and on again). This triggers a
reset.
Return to normal operation: The standstill function and the emergency braking function are re-enabled
for operation as soon as the speed of the vehicle exceeds 10 km/h.
36
Trailer EBS
Correction options in WABCO EBS If a truck/trailer harmonisation becomes necessary due to wear and/or
for trailers: compatibility problems between the towing vehicle and trailer, an adjustment
of the application pressure for the wheel brakes or a predominance can be
defined by changing the parameters.
Note: This requires the PIN code to enable the special functions in the diagnostic
software for WABCO Trailer EBS however.
Since it is possible to change settings (parameters) in the trailer EBS control
unit that are relevant to safety, only customers who have completed an EBS
training course with us can obtain this PIN.
Attention! Any modifications to the control - and braking pressures may only deviate
up to a maximum of 0.2 bar from those given in the brake calculation
(parameter settings of the manufacturer). Values greater than this will
require a new brake calculation by the manufacturer!
Testing the vehicle: Initially it is necessary to measure the braking forces of all axles on a roller
test stand and to determine the compatibility band position of the individual
vehicles.
For trailers with EBS the following With a pressure at the yellow coupling head (pm) of
values should be reached unladen Pm = 0.7 bar => Start of braking
and laden:
Pm = 2.0 bar => Deceleration approx. 12 %
Pm = 6.5 bar => Deceleration approx. 55 %
These values may differ slightly according to national regulations and are
documented in the brake calculation applicable to the vehicle.
Checking the response pressure: If the start of braking occurs at a pm pressure above 0.7 bar, the response
pressures on all the wheel brakes must be checked. For this purpose
proceed as follows:
1. Supply the vehicle with air and power
2. Connect PC diagnosis and open the Control|Pressure test menu item
3. Lift first axle
4. Simulate bellows pressure for the laden vehicle
5. Turn one wheel and increase the control pressure in 0.1 bar steps (left
and right cursor keys)
6. Determine the braking pressure (cylinder pressure not control pressure!)
at which the wheel becomes difficult or impossible to turn
7. Repeat this test on the other wheels/axles
8. Calculate the average value of the determined response pressures and
compare with the parameterised value; parameterise the new value if
applicable.
37
Trailer EBS
Example: Response pressure set in the EBS modulator parameters = 0.3 bar
Mean response pressure = 0.53 bar => rounded down to 0.5 bar
The difference of 0.2 bar between the two values must be added to the
braking pressure.
The braking pressures in laden Changes to the brake cylinder pressures in the parameter setting for the
state must be adjusted as follows laden vehicle:
in this example: 1st: 0.3 bar to 0.5 bar
2nd: 1.2 bar to 1.4 bar
3rd: 6.2 bar to 6.4 bar
38
Trailer EBS
Standard values for WABCO brake These standard values guarantee the following with the WABCO brake
calculation for T-EBS: calculation for the trailer:
Start of braking in the compatibility band at pm = 0.7 bar.
At pm = 2.0 bar the unladen and laden vehicle decelerates with approx.
12 % and
At pm = 6.5 bar the vehicle decelerates with 55 %.
If these values are not reached, without faults being identified in the wheel
brake or the pneumatic system of the trailer, the predominance setting can
be used to adjust the deceleration values for the vehicle.
Setting a predominance: To define a predominance of e.g. 0.2 bar, reduce the control pressures as
follows:
0.7 to 0.5 bar
2.0 to 1.8 bar
Result following the adjustment: With these changed parameters the trailer now already starts braking at
pm = 0.5 bar and already has a deceleration of 12 % at pm = 1.8. The
deceleration of 55 % at pm = 6.5 bar remains unchanged. In the partial
brake range up to 2.0 bar there is therefore only a parallel displacement of
the characteristic curve.
For trailer modulators produced since week 25/99 any modifications to the parameters in
these modulators will cause the end-of-line bit to be set.
This means that once the truck/trailer harmonisation has been completed - following the
last parameter change that is - a full start-up procedure needs to be carried out, because
otherwise the EBS/ABS warning lamp in the towing vehicle will not go out.
Changes to the parameters should also be documented by a new EBS system label on the
vehicle.
39
Trailer EBS
Standard values for new WABCO These standard values guarantee the following with the WABCO brake
brake calculation for T-EBS E: calculation for the trailer:
Start of braking in the compatibility band at pm = 0.6 bar.
At pm = 2.0 bar the unladen and laden vehicle decelerates with approx.
14 %
At pm = 6.5 bar the vehicle decelerates with 56 - 57 %.
If these values are not actually reached, without faults being identified
in the wheel brake / pneumatic system or the EBS parameters of the
trailer, the characteristic curve in the braking band can be adjusted for the
vehicle by means of setting a predominance value. This adjustment of the
characteristic curve is a parallel shift and leads to a higher (predominance)
or lower (lag) braking pressure with the same control pressure at the yellow
coupling head.
40
Trailer EBS
Result following the adjustment: With these changed parameters, the trailer vehicle now starts braking at
pm = 0.4 bar. The calculated braking values are already reached at
1.8 bar. The deceleration pm = 6.5 bar remains unchanged. Within the
partial braking range up to 2.0 bar there is a parallel translation of the
characteristic.
With control units of the Trailer EBS-E generation, a new start-up procedure for the vehicle is
not absolutely necessary after the predominance values have been changed.
Changes to the parameters should also be documented by a new EBS system label on the
vehicle.
41
Towing vehicle with EBS
3
1
1 7
EBS
2
EPS
ENR
8
RETARDER
6
MOTOR 4
5
3
42
Towing vehicle with EBS
Generally applicable notes relating In contrast to conventional braking systems, the truck/trailer harmonisation
to the truck/trailer harmonisation cannot be carried out in the usual way for towing vehicles with EBS.
test for towing vehicles with EBS: Different braking systems (EPB / EBS 1,2,3,4 etc.) and control strategies
developed by towing vehicle manufacturers for trailer control as well as
electronic control and correspondingly programmed functions (e.g. coupling
force / deceleration control, braking force distribution, lining wear control,
endurance brake integration and roller test stand modes) make it impossible
to carry out and evaluate the truck/trailer harmonisation in the usual way.
Testing the trailer (except the test of pin 6 and pin 7 ports) is not affected in
the case of EBS-braked towing vehicles and can be carried out as before.
43
Towing vehicle with EBS
Lining wear optimisation and ease Control of the trailer is implemented electronically by means of the towing
of maintenance through EBS: vehicle to trailer interface (ISO 11992) as well as pneumatically via the
electro-pneumatic trailer control valve. The coupling force is not sensed to
save costs.
Initially the deceleration of the towing vehicle lies at the centre of the
compatibility band. If the trailer deceleration has the same value at this time,
no coupling forces are generated. If the trailer deceleration deviates from
this position at the centre of the band, the towing vehicle ECU detects this
through the "deceleration control" program function and adjusts the trailer
control pressure accordingly. If the response threshold of the trailer brakes
should be greater, this is compensated by a corresponding pressure inshot.
Control when the electronic control If the electronic control system malfunctions, all valves simultaneously
system fails: coordinate operation as in a conventional pneumatic system. Backup
pressures are here conducted to the brake cylinders where the pneumatic
system, however, is effectively applied only with a certain delay.
44
Towing vehicle with EBS
Automatic truck/trailer The automatic truck/trailer harmonisation in towing vehicles with EBS always
harmonisation through coupling aims to reduce the coupling forces between the vehicles to the ideal level.
force control: On this basis it is permissible for the towing vehicle to leave the band limits
of the ECE directive No.13 and/or EC directive 71/320.
The regulations for vehicles with EBS were adjusted accordingly in 1998.
The required position for towing vehicles is described in the current
ECE-R13 (Section 5.2.1.28.5.).
Knowledge pertaining in particular to old or poorly maintained trailers, which
barely meet the specified bank position at low braking pressures, make this
necessary as well.
The figure below shows the possible control range of a towing vehicle with
EBS. This range is only fully utilised if the trailer makes this necessary.
Upper limit
TM/PM [-]
Possible
control range
Lower limit
(ECE-R 13; 5.2.1.28.5)
pm [bar]
45
Towing vehicle with EBS
Basic design towing vehicle: The basic design of the EBS towing vehicle corresponds with the central
band position of a laden vehicle over the entire braking range.
A deceleration control function here permits constant adjustment of the
vehicle deceleration to coupling head pressure ratio relative to the detected
trailer behaviour during normal driving operation.
Typical,
conventional trailer
pm [bar]
46
Towing vehicle with EBS
Effect of the truck/trailer From the very first deceleration after starting to drive the difference in
harmonisation: braking behaviour is detected and corrected as illustrated in Fig. 2.
One can see clearly that the towing vehicle’s braking behaviour is adjusted
to the trailer’s behaviour relative to the braking pressure at the coupling
head "brake" (pm).
With each deceleration the braking behaviour is compared again and further
corrections are carried out where necessary. This continuously improves the
truck/trailer harmonisation, while the predominance changed for the partial
braking range of the trailer up to 2.0 bar retains its effect.
Typical,
conventional trailer
pm [bar]
Ideal combination: EBS in both The best results are achieved when both the towing vehicle and the trailer
vehicles are equipped with EBS.
Due to the transmission of additional data via the CAN interface of the
standardised electrical connection (ISO 7638) between towing vehicle
and trailer, deceleration curves of the respective vehicles in a combination
become almost identical in the low braking pressure range so that wear is
largely synchronised between the vehicles as well.
47
Towing vehicle with EBS
Test of towing vehicles with EBS: To test the truck/trailer harmonisation the braking performance of the wheel
brake must be determined on the EBS towing vehicle as well, just as
described above.
Evaluation of the determined braking performance on the EBS towing
vehicle is carried out either according to
a) the familiar method of extrapolation or
b) the method of comparing with basic values
The braking pressures are measured in the brake cylinders of the axles as
well as the braking forces reached by these pressures.
Evaluation: If the extrapolation yields the legally required minimum deceleration (43 %)
or the reference/basic values often specified by the respective towing
vehicle manufacturer are reached during the test, the braking performance
is OK.
The braking force distribution and deceleration control are then assumed to
function correctly in the towing vehicle EBS.
When extrapolated, the calculation pressure for towing vehicles with WABCO EBS is
pN = 8.5 bar.
48
Towing vehicle with EBS
What are basic values? Basic values are braking forces which must be reached by the
Brake cylinder sizes
Brake lever lengths (with drum brakes)
Brake cylinder pressures
Wheel/tyre sizes, if applicable,
installed in the vehicle.
The test according to basic values should also be carried out - in
accordance with specifications - at the highest possible pressure in the
brake cylinder.
Where do the basic values come The basic or reference values for the respective towing vehicles can be
from? requested from the vehicle manufacturers.
They are available in the workshop manuals and workshop information
system (WIS) or as service information. They may also have been entered in
the inspection book of the vehicle (safety test suggestion).
Example for basic values: In the example below you will find basic values for:
MAN L 2000 and M 2000 with the WABCO disk brake PAN 17
Braking force per axle in daN with cylinder pressure in the air cylinder
Axle Brake cylinder
1.0 bar 1.5 bar 2.0 bar 2.5 bar 3.0 bar 3.5 bar
49
Towing vehicle with EBS
Using the driver that normally drives this vehicle for this test drive makes it probable that the
brakes will also be operated as usual, which, when analysed, may provide evidence that the
way of driving is a possible cause for wear complaints.
50
Towing vehicle with EBS
Notes on evaluation: Identical wheel brake types (e.g. disk/disk or drum/drum) on all axles should
also result in approximately equal brake temperatures on all axles!
Different wheel brake types (disk/drum) or sizes (22.5 inch / 19.5 inch) also
result in different operating temperatures so that several measurements
or settings may be required before an acceptable behaviour can be
determined.
In the case of wheel brakes and wheels of similar size on towing vehicle and
towed vehicle, experience has shown that temperature differences of 60 -
70 °C are quite acceptable. Greater differences should give rise to further
analyses. In the case of different brake sizes and wheels, these values can
be around 100 – 110 °C without this necessarily constituting a defect.
Adjusting the parameters in the The towing vehicle EBS parameters are normally adjusted by means of
towing vehicle EBS: diagnostic program (WABCO Diagnostic Software or diagnostic solution of
the vehicle manufacturer) installed on a PC.
Access to control unit parameters is normally protected and if the WABCO
diagnosis is used, access is only possible after completing a corresponding
system training course (EBS Towing Vehicle in this case) beforehand and
with a corresponding PIN code.
Any changes of control unit data are the responsibility of the user and
require that approval has been obtained from the vehicle manufacturer.
51
Worksheets truck/trailer harmonisation as copy templates
52
pm
Towing vehicle Test weight: ______________kg Towed vehicle Test weight: ______________kg
1st axle 2nd axle 3rd axle Total 1st axle 2nd axle 3rd axle Total
P1 F1 P2 F2 P3 F3 FB z pm P1 F1 P2 F2 P3 F3 FB z
(bar) le (daN) ri (bar) le (daN) ri (bar) le (daN) ri (daN) (%) (bar) (bar) le (daN) ri (bar) le (daN) ri (bar) le (daN) ri (daN) (%)
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
4.0
Worksheets truck/trailer harmonisation as copy templates
5.0
ൌ ܼǢ ן on all axles
6.5
௧௩ᇱ௦௦
்௦௧௪௧௧௩
P1-3 = pressure applied into the brake cylinders in bar z = deceleration of the vehicle in %
F1-3 = sum of the braking forces on the axle in daN FB = sum of the braking forces in daN
Formula:
53
pm = pressure at the coupling head Brake in bar Gp = test weight of the vehicle in kg
ܨ
ݖൌ ൈ ͳͲͲ
ܩ
z = deceleration in %
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0,2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7,5 8
54
Worksheets truck/trailer harmonisation as copy templates
z = deceleration in %
100
90
80
70
U
60
V
50
40
30
20
10
0
0,2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7,5 8
Workshop: Customer:
56
pm
Towing vehicle Test weight: ______________kg Towed vehicle Test weight: ______________kg
1st axle 2nd axle 3rd axle Total 1st axle 2nd axle 3rd axle Total
P1 F1 P2 F2 P3 F3 FB z pm P1 F1 P2 F2 P3 F3 FB z
(bar) le (daN) ri (bar) le (daN) ri (bar) le (daN) ri (daN) (%) (bar) (bar) le (daN) ri (bar) le (daN) ri (bar) le (daN) ri (daN) (%)
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
4.0
Worksheets truck/trailer harmonisation as copy templates
5.0
ൌ ܼǢ ן on all axles
6.5
௧௩ᇱ௦௦
்௦௧௪௧௧௩
P1-3 = pressure applied into the brake cylinders in bar z = deceleration of the vehicle in %
F1-3 = sum of the braking forces on the axle in daN FB = sum of the braking forces in daN
Formula:
57
pm = pressure at the coupling head Brake in bar Gp = test weight of the vehicle in kg
ܨ
ݖൌ ൈ ͳͲͲ
ܩ
z = deceleration in %
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0,2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7,5 8
58
Worksheets truck/trailer harmonisation as copy templates
z = deceleration in %
100
90
80
70
U
60
V
50
40
30
20
10
0
0,2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7,5 8
General data
Date_______________________________________________________________________________________
Name of workshop____________________________________________________________________________
Name of mechanic____________________________________________________________________________
Name of driver________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________
61
Notes
62
WABCO (NYSE: WBC) is technologies, including advanced
© 2018 WABCO Europe BVBA – All rights reserved – 815 010 120 3 - 23 / 8.2018
a leading global supplier of driver assistance, braking,
technologies and services that steering and stability control
improve the safety, efficiency systems. Powered by its vision for
and connectivity of commercial accident-free driving and greener
vehicles. Originating from the transportation solutions, WABCO
Westinghouse Air Brake Company is also at the forefront of advanced
founded nearly 150 years ago, fleet management systems that
WABCO continues to pioneer contribute to commercial fleet
breakthrough innovations to efficiency. In 2017, WABCO
enable autonomous driving in reported sales of $3.3 billion and
the commercial vehicle industry. has nearly 15,000 employees in 40
Today, leading truck, bus and countries. For more information,
trailer brands worldwide rely visit
on WABCO’s differentiating
www.wabco-auto.com