QUESTION When the Revised Rules on Evidence was adopted? A. March 14, 1989 B. January 1, 1932 C. December 1, 2000 D. July 1, 1972 “it ls our our moral responsibilty to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” ee San crowns cnmeemcnes somes >: memes (2) CourtamagnniemsaRinem@yabes.coma AND | NTOR: Lc [TE ara Hat CRIMINOL 5 rr ELNO We QUESTION In criminal case, an accused can only be convicted if his guilt is proven beyond reasonable doubt. The effect of failure to prove it warrants the court to . Admonish the accused B. Reprimand the accused C. Acquit the accused D. All of the foregoing “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” What Crimineiogiat Knows? Chariemapne i Sree Seoeireticics nies coacaemcens somes A aaes, [a] Cheramepagameentnai@pabes.seatbate |e] + J NI bt] | CI (Tes ara Hat CRIMINOL 5 rr ELNO We QUESTION At the hearing of an application for admission to bail, the has the burden of showing that the evidence of guilt is strong. A. Prosecution B. Defense c. Court D. Bailiff “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” Se a rn crowns cneeemanes somes #: names (2) Curlamagenjansanaemyabes.comQUESTION In case of doubt, that is, the inculpatory facts and circumstances are capable of two or more explanations, one of which is consistent with the guilt of the accused and the other consistent with the innocence of the accused, then the evidence A. Fulfills the test of moral certainty and therefore warrants a conviction B. Does not fulfill the test of moral certainty. hence, not enough to produce a conviction C. Fulfills the test of proof beyond reasonable doubt. D. All of the above “it ls our our moral responsibilty to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” fF What Crimineiagiat Knows? Chariemapne lo See ceeiotncics aes cnactemceoy somes A aaes, Ee) Cuerlamepagamrestaaigpabes.seatQUESTION The burden of proof in criminal cases is the responsibility of A. Prosecution B. Defense Cc. Law enforcement D. Judge “it ls our our moral responsibilty to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” What Crimineiagiat Knews? Chariamapne lim seme coammmategies nowe? onartomegns somes P. Aames (2) Chertemegaajemesha@ivehes.coasbate |e] + J NI Ft] | CI (Tes ara Hat CRIMINOL 5 rr ELNO We QUESTION The degree of proof required in criminal cases to convict the accused is: A. Moral certainty B. Preponderance of evidence C. Proof beyond reasonable doubt D. Substantial evidence “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” What Crimineiogiat Knows? Chariemapne i Sexes Scotti conse cnacnemceos Aames aaes, [e) Cheramepagaaeestaai@pabes.seatbate |e] + J NI bt] | CI (Tes ara Hat CRIMINOL 5 rr ENO QUESTION What do you call that quantum of evidence which a reasonable mind might accept as sufficient to justify a conclusion? A. Substantial B. Appropriate C. Adequate D. Proper “it ls our our moral responsibilty to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” Se a in crowns cneeemanes somes #: memes (2) Curlamagenjansaiaemyabes.combate |e] + J NI Ft] | CI (Tes ara Hat CRIMINOL 5 rr ELNO We QUESTION What doctrine allows evidence obtained by the police officers in an illegal searched and seizures to be used against the accused? A. Exclusionary doctrine B. Miranda ruling C. Fruit of poisonous tree D. Silver plater What Crimineiogiat Knows? Chariemapne i Sere Seoirtacics noes cnacaemcens somes ames, Ee) Cheramepagaarestaai@pabee.seat “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.”QUESTION The kinds of immnity suits A. RA 1379 B. The law providing for the forfeiture of unlawfully acquired property Cc. PD 749 in relation to prosecution for bribery and graft D. All of the above “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” Se a in crowns cneeemanes somes #: momee (2) Curlamageniamsaiaemyabes.coma AND | NTOR: Lc Te ara Hat CRIMINOL 5 rr ENO We QUESTION It is an evidence required in a civil case, that which is of greater weight or more convincing in opposition to ae. A. Substantial evidence B. Preponderance evidence c. Circumstantial evidence D. Clear and convincing evidence “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” What Crimineiogiat Knows? Chariemapne i Sere Seoirtacics noes cnacaemcens somes ames, Ee) Cheramepagaarestaai@pabee.seatbaa |e] + J NI bt] | CEI s (Tes aa Hat CRIMINOL LS GNCeh ne QUESTION When the accused interposes the defense of relative, burden of evidence is on his part and requires what degree of proof? A. Clear and Convincing proof B. Substantial proof C. Proof beyond reasonable doubt D. Preponderance of evidence “itis our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” Se a San ccoent cneeemanes somes o: mames (2) Curlamapegiansainemyahes-combaa | i ND | - - _CENTE!S ar Hat CRIMINOL ro KLNoy: ¢@ QUESTION During trial, Atty. Dolendo offered evidence that appeared irrelevant at that time but he said he was eventually going to relate to the issue in the case by some future evidence. The defendant objected. Should the trial court reject the evidence in question on ground of irrelevance? A. No, it should reserve its ruling until the relevance is shown. B. Yes, since the plaintiff could anyway subsequently present the evidence anew. €. Yes, since irrelevant evidence is not admissible. D. No, it should admit it conditionally until its relevance is shown. “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” Se a ain croese cneeemanes somes 0: names (2) Churlamagenjemsaiaem@yabes.compe | ND J NTOR! | CEI s res aw Hat CRIMINOL LRG rehs QUESTION Among the following which are/is the concept of the multiple admissibility of evidence. A. Evidence offered is admissible for one purpose or more B. Evidence is inadmissible’ for one purpose but admissible for another or vice versa €. Evidence is admissible by one party but not against another D. All of the above “it ls our our moral responsibilty to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” Se a rn rca cneeemanes somes >: memes (2) Courlamageniamsatnem@yabes.combaa |e] + J NI bt] | CEI s (Tes aa Hat CRIMINOL LS GNreh ae QUESTION Which of the following matters is NOT A PROPER SUBJECT of judicial notice? A. Canadian law on succession personally known to the presiding judge. B. Persons have killed even without motive. C. City ordinances of Antipolo city where the MCTC sits. D. Teleconferencing is now a way of conducting business transactions. “itis our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” What Crimineiogiat Knew? Chariemapne i Smee eoeirticics vos ctactemceos somes A ames, [a] Cuoramepagamentaai@pabesseatbate |e] + J NI Ft] | CI (Tes ara Hat CRIMINOL 5 rr ELNO We QUESTION A vicarious admission is considered an exception to the hearsay rule. It, however, does not cover: . Admission by a conspirator B. Admission by privy Cc. Judicial admission D. Adoptive admission “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” Se a in crowns cneeemanes somes #: memes (2) Curlamapegiamsaniaem@yabes.com5 ae | i ND | No « (res WA Hat CRIMINOL 3 rr RELNOWe @ QUESTION Which of the following admissions made by a party in the course of judicial proceedings is a judicial admission? A. Admissions made in a pleading signed by the party and his counsel intended to be filed. B. An admission made in a pleading in another case between the same parties. €. Admission made by counsel in open court. D. Admissions made in a complaint superseded by an amended complaint. “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” f Wmat Crimineiagiat Knows? Chartemapne lo See creeirotccics mooans ceatomceoy same A aaron, [ea] Cheramepagaaestaai@pabeeseatbate |e] + J NI pF] | CEI (Tes aa Hat CRIMINOL 5 rr ENO WE QUESTION As a general rule, an offer of compromise in a criminal case is an implied admission of guilt, except A. In a quasi-offenses (reckless imprudence) B. Criminal violations of the national internal revenue code C. Minor offenses under the local government code whose penalties do not exceed one year D. All of the above “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” Se a aan crowns cneeemanes somes 0: names (2) Curlamapeajansanaemyabes-com5 ae | i ND | No « (Te! aa Hat CRIMINOL 3 rr RENO WE «: memes (2) CurtamageniamscRine@yahes.com5 a | | ND | - - _CENTES ar Hat CRIMINOL r KLNos: Vt.) QUESTION The act of Tinidora in settling the case is? A. An offer of compromise and an implied admission of guilt hence, admissible as evidence. B. An offer of compromise and not an implied admission of guilt hence, inadmissible as evidence. C.Not an offer of compromise and not an implied admission of guilt hence, inadmissible as evidence. D. Not an offer of compromise and an implied admission of guilt hence, admissible as evidence. “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” Se a ain crcee cneemnnes somes 0: names (2) Churlamagenjemsaniaem@yabes.comus | ND] 7 Wit CRIMINOL QUESTION The act, declaration or omission of a party as to relevant fact may be given in evidence against the offeror. A. admission of a party B. admission by the third party Cc. confession D. offer of compromise “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” “f What Criminetagiat Knows? Chariemapne im tence cramimategies mowe? cnartomeges somes P. Acmes (2) Chertemegaajemeshn@ivehes.c000| ND J QUESTION During the pre-trial, Alden personally offered to settle the case for Pl Million to the private prosecutor, who immediately put the offer on record in the presence of the trial judge. Is Alden’s offer a judicial admission of his guilt? A. Yes, offer is an admission of guilt. It was repeated by the private prosecutor in the presence of judge at the pre-trial. B. Yes, the offer which was an extrajudicial admission becomes transposed into a judicial admission. There is no need of assistance of counsel. As it was repeated. C. Yes, it was personally offer by the accused himself. D. All of the above “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” Se a ain crowns cnmeemanes somes 0: names (2) Churlamapeniensenaem@yabes-compe | ND J NTO: | CEI res an Hat CRIMINOL rr ENO We QUESTION An’ offer in writing to pay a particular sum of money or to deliver a written instrument or specific personal property is, if rejected without valid cause, equivalent to the actual production and tender of the money, instrument or property. A. unaccepted offer B. offer of compromise in civil cases C. offer of compromise in criminal cases D. offer to pay the payment of medical, hospital or other expenses on occasioned by injury “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” What Crimineiagiat Knews? Chariemapne i See eesti mae coacnemceos somes a aaes, [e) Cueramepagaarestnaigpaiee.seatus ND] 7 WA t CRIMINOL QUESTION Similar acts as evidence A. Res inter alies acta branch 1 B. Res inter alios acta branch 2 Cc. Res inter alios acta branch 3 D. Res inter alios acta branch 4 “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” “f What Criminetagiat Knows? Chariemapne im tence cramimategies mowe? cnartomeges somes P. Acmes (2) Chertemegaajemeshn@ivehes.c000bate |e] + J NI Ft] | CI (Tes ara Hat CRIMINOL 5 rr ELNO WE QUESTION Provides that the right of a party cannot be prejudiced by an act, declaration, or omission of another unless it falls under the exceptional circumstances. A. Privies B. Conspiracy Cc. Compromise D. Res Inter Alios Acta Rule nocere non debet “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” What Crimineiogiat Knows? Chariemapne i Sere Seoirtacics noes cnacaemcens somes ames, Ee) Cheramepagaarestaai@pabee.seat5 ae | | ND J aa Hat CRIMINOL QUESTION ~n admission by a conspirator is admissible against his co-conspirator if the following are present EXCEPT if the: A. Admission relates te the conspiracy B. Admission was made extra-judicially C. Conspiracy is shown by evidence other than the admission D. Admission was understood “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” Se a in crowns cneeemanes somes #: memes (2) Curlamapegiemsaiaemyabes.com| ND I QUESTION Tidora testified that a month after the robbery Yayadub, one of the accused, told him that Alden was one of those who committed the crime with him. Is Tidora’s testimony regarding what Yayadub told him admissible in evidence against Alden? A. No, since it is hearsay. B. No, since Yayadub did not make the statement during the conspiracy. C. Yes, since it constitutes admission against a co- conspirator . D. Yes, since it part of the res gestae. “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” What Crimineiogiat Knows? Chariemapne See Seoeotcice mais cnacaemceos somos ames, [e) Cueramepagaarentaai@pabee.seat| ND J QUESTION ~n extra-judicial confession made by the accused shall not be sufficient ground for conviction except if corroborated by evidence of corpus delicti which means. I. In homicide, it refers to the fact of killing II.In arson, it refers to the fact of burning III.In theft, it refers to the fact of stealing Iv.In Fencing, it refers to the fact of buying V. The fact of the commission of crime A.I, II, TI, Iv and Vv B.1, I and IIT c.I, If and Iv D. II and Iv “it ls our our moral responsibilty to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” Se arn cco cneeemanes somes o: memes (2) Churtamageqiamseinem@yabes.com| AND I NT a EL S RIMINOLOGI QUESTION In an extra-judicial confession executed before the NBI, Alden charged with murder, voluntarily admitted the charge but implicated Tidora and Nidora as his co-conspirator. Apprehended, Tidora and Nidora vehemently denied the charge. After the conduct of preliminary investigation, Alden, Tidora and Nidora were charged in court for murder. During the trial, counsel of Tidora and Nidora vigorously objected to Alden’s testimony in court implicating his co-accused.) Is the testimony of Alden in court admissible? Decide. A. A‘s testimony during the trail is admissible. B. It is an exception to hearsay rule. €. Considering that ‘the confession is a| judicial confession or made in a joint trial where his co-accused can cross- examine him. D. All of the above “It Is our our moral responsibility to help others achieve their dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” “f. Whet Crimineingiet Knewa? Chertemegae James >. Ramee SD (>Gnarinmagnajementase am ims Grummratostat news? Chartomegne same P. lames \) CharlomapnajameshalS@yehes.comus | ND] 7 Wit CRIMINOL QUESTIONS Tidora’s confession is admissible A. Interlocking confession B. Adoptive confession C. Extra-Judicial admission D. All of the above “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” ee rn cco cnmeemcnes somes o: memes (2) Courlamagenjamsaninem@yabes.comus | ND] 7 Wit CRIMINOL QUESTION Maine’s exclamation is admissible as A. Interlocking confession B. Adoptive confession C. Extra-Judicial admission D. All of the above “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” “f What Criminetagiat Knows? Chariemapne lim tines cramtategies nowe? onartomegns somes P. ames (2) Chertomegaajemesh@ivehes.c000bate - + J NI bt] | CI (Tes ara Hat CRIMINOL 5 rr ENO We QUESTION This admission occurs when a person manifest his assent to the statement of other person. A. Adoptive admission B. Extra-judicial confession C. Judicial confession D. Offer of compromise “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” Se a aan crowns cneeemanes somes o: memes (2) Curtamapeqjamsaniaemyabes.combate |e] + J NI Ft] | CI (Tes ara Hat CRIMINOL 5 rr ELNO We QUESTION The court shall consider no evidence, which has not been formally offered. The purpose for which the evidence is offered must be specified. This is known as A. Offer of evidence B. Ruling in evidence C. Offer and objection D. None of the above “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” What Crimineiogiat Knows? Chariemapne i Sere Seoirtacics noes cnacaemcens somes ames, Ee) Cheramepagaarestaai@pabee.seatus | ND] 7 WA t CRIMINOL mt QUESTION Presentation of evidence consist of I. Testimony of the witnesses Il.0bjects or things duly identified and marked as exhibits III .Documents duly identified and marked as exhibits A. I, IZ and r1r B. II and III Cc. D. II and I I only “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” Se nan cco cnmeemanes somes o: memes (2) Courtamageniamsannemyabes-comrt AND | NTOR: | CENT 2 s (Tes aa Hat CRIMINOL z rr ENO WE QUESTION Documentary and object evidence shall be offered A. After the objection of the adverse party on the formal offer of said exhibits B. After the ruling of the court’s on the offer of said exhibits C. After the presentation of a party’s testimonial evidence D. All of the above “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” Se a aan crowns cneeemanes somes o: momes (2) Curlemapeqianseiaemyabes com5 ae i ND | No : « (res WA Hat CRIMINOL 3 rr RLNO We @ QUESTION The presiding judge in a case for homicide orders the defense to file affidavits of its witnesses which will serve as direct examination. Is the order of the judge correct? A. Not correct because testifying orally of a witness in court will enable the judge to observe the manner and deportment of the witness whether he is an elusive or a rehearsed witness B. Yes because the purpose of the judge is to expedite trial without delay Cc. All of the above D. None of the above “it ls our our moral responsibilty to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” ee nan crows cnmeemenes somes o: names (2) Courlamagenjamseine@yabes.combaa |e] + J NI bt] | CEI s (Tes aa Hat CRIMINOL LS GNCeh ne QUESTION The general rule is that testimonies of witnesses must be given orally in open court and cannot be presented in affidavits EXCEPT A. Cases covered by the rule on summary procedure B. Cases within the) jurisdiction of RTC’s Cc. Cases within the jurisdiction of MIC’s D. All of the above “itis our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” What Crimineiogiat Knew? Chariemapne i Smee eoeirticics vos ctactemceos somes A ames, [a] Cuoramepagamentaai@pabesseatbate |e] + J N77] bt] | CI (Tes ara Hat CRIMINOL 5 rr ENO We QUESTION Documentary exhibits are formally offered to the court for its consideration or admission, one by one in the order they have been marked as exhibit by; A. Identifying each by stating the marking of the exhibits B. Describing it briefly €. Stating the specifi¢ purpose for which each exhibit is offered D. All of the above “it ls our our moral responsibilty to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” f Whet Crimineiagiat Knew? Chariemapne i Sree eesti eas cnacaemceos somos aaes, Ee) Charamepagaaeestaai@pabes.seat| ND J QUESTION Did Atty. Dolendo commit any error in the manner by which he made an offer of the documentary evidence? Decide. A. Yes, Atty. Dolendo failed to describe said documentary evidence; B. Atty. Dolendo also failed to state the purpose of Exhibits A and B C. Atty. Dolendo also failed to state the purpose of Exhibit C D. All of the above “it ls our our moral responsibilty to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” What Crimineiagiat Knews? Chariemapne Sees eesti mca cnacaemceos somes ames, [e) Cheramepagaarentnai@paiee.seatQUESTION When offered evidence is not objected to, such failure to object amounts to A. A waiver B. A denial Cc. An admission D. A defer “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” ee arn roe cnmeemanes somes >: memes (2) Courtemagenjamsainem@yabes.combe | ND I NTOR! | CEI s Tes a Hat CRIMINOL LEG e hs QUESTION The tender of excluded evidence is made as follows: A. If the documents or things offered as evidence are excluded by the court, the offeror may have the same attached to or made part of the record B. State briefly what is alll about the document and mark it as exhibit again. C.If the evidence excluded is oral testimony, the offeror may state for the record the name and other personal circumstances of the witness and the substance of the proposed testimony D. All of the above “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” What Crimineiogiat Knows? Chariemapne Se ceoeoticice mais ctacaemceos somos ames, [e) Cueamepagaaeentaaigpabee.seat5 ae | | ND J aa Hat CRIMINOL QUESTION When shall a party through his counsel rest its case? A. Immediately after the offer of the _ testimonial evidence of all his witness B. After the court’s ruling on said formal offer of exhibits C. After the objection of the adverse party on the formal offer of said exhibits D. All of the above “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” What Crimineiogiat Knows? Chariemapne i Sree Scores noes cnacaemceos Aawes A aaes, Ea) Choramepagaaeestnaipabes.seatbe i ND | -NTOR! | CEI -s ps aa Hat CRIMINOL i rr RENO We QUESTION Is there any error made in the manner an offer of the documentary evidence? A. Alden’s counsel did not follow the rules, the offer should be made after the testimony of witnesses. B. Maine’s counsel because he failed to describe his documentary evidence and to state the purpose therein. ¢. Both that formally offers the document there is no issue at all. D. All of the above “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” an cas oneeemcees somes >: memes (2) Courtamageniamsetinem@yabes.combate |e] + J NI bt] | CI (Tes ara Hat CRIMINOL 5 rr ENO We QUESTION Tender to excluded evidence is known in law practice as A. Ruling of the court B. offer of evidence C. Offer of proof D. All of the above “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” Se a in crowns cneeemanes somes #: momee (2) Curlamageniamsaiaemyabes.coma i ND | a =H ¢ Wet CrRIiMine ae QUESTION Tender to excluded evidence is known in law practice as A. Ruling of the court B. offer of evidence C. Offer of proof (Proffer of Evidence) D. All of the above “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” ee en naa cross cnmeemenes somes >: memes (2) CourtamageniamseRine@yahes.combate - + J N77] bt] | CI (Tes ara Hat CRIMINOL 5 rr ELNO We QUESTION It refers either to the offer of the testimony of a witness prior to the latter’s testimony. Or the offer of documentary and object evidence after a party has presented his testimonial evidence. A.Ruling of the court B.0ffer of evidence C.0ffer of proof D.All of the above “it ls our our moral responsibilty to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” What Crimineiogiat Knew? Chariemapne i Sexes Seoeoticics ncaa cnacaemcess somes 0 aaes, Ee) Choramepagaarentaai@paiee.seatbate |e] + J NI Ft] | CI (Tes ara Hat CRIMINOL 5 rr ELNO We QUESTION When the evidence presented in court during trial by the State and the accused are of equal weight, which will prevail? A. It depends B. Accused Cc. State D. None “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” Se a in crowns cneeemanes somes #: memes (2) Curlamapegiamsaniaem@yabes.combate |e] + J NI bt] | CI (Tes ara Hat CRIMINOL 5 rr ENO QUESTION The rules on evidence classify evidence according to form, into A. Real evidence B. Documentary evidence Cc. Testimonial evidence D. All of them “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” What Crimineiogiat Knows? Chariemapne i Sexes Scotti conse cnacnemceos Aames aaes, [e) Cheramepagaaeestaai@pabes.seatQUESTION Res Ipsa Loquitor means A. A Class of its own kind B. At first glance c. On its own initiative D. The thing speaks for itself “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” ee arn roe cnmeemanes somes >: memes (2) Courtemagenjamsainem@yabes.compe | ND J NTOR! | CEI res as Hat CRIMINOL Qr ENO we QUESTION If the witness is the accused, he may be asked to do certain mechanical or physical acts, and which of the following is not a violation against self-incrimination. EXCEPT A. To be fingerprinted even without the assistance of the lawyer B. To be paraffin — tested even without the assistance of the lawyer C. To be subjected to ultra - violet power without the presence of the lawyer D. Writing or taking dictations “it ls our our moral responsibilty to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” What Crimineiogiat Knews? Chariemapne Se Seon mnie coacnemceos Aawos ames, Ee) Cueamepagaarestaaigpabee.seatQUESTION Suppose that the surgeon Dr. Padski agreed to and did perform the surgery is the package of Shabu admissible in evidence? A. Yes, the package shabu extracted is admissible because it does not violate the constitutional right against self-incrimination. B.No, the package shabu extracted is not admissible considering that it was obtain through surgery which connotes forcible invasion into the body of Alden. Cc. Yes, the package shabu is admissible considering that the arrest was made lawfully and it was incidental to lawful arrest D. No, the act of Police officer Cardo and Dr. Padski violate the fundamental rights of Alden. “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” Se nin cee cneeemanes somes >: names (2) Curtemageqiemsenitemyabes.com5 ae | i ND | No « (res aa Hat CRIMINOL 3 rr ENO We @ QUESTION Among the following best describe the Right against self-incrimination EXCEPT A.A prohibition of the use of physical or moral compulsion, to extort communications from a person. B. It is simply a prohibition against legal process to extract from the accused's. own lips, against his will, admission of his guilt. c. Giving testimony in a trial or other legal proceeding that could “subject one to criminal prosecution. D. None of these “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” ee an crowns cnmeemenes somes >: memes (2) CurtamageniamscRine@yahes.compe | ND J -NTOR! | CEI res a Hat CRIMINOL Qr ENO we QUESTION Is Invasive and involuntary procedures such as Surgery, expulsion of morphine from one’s mouth, DNA testing to obtain evidence are admissible as evidence? A. Yes, it is constitutionally sound. B. Yes, Invasive and involuntary procedures is a clear non-violation of Right against, self-incrimination. c. Yes, violation of right against self-incrimination is applicable only to Testimonial evidence. D. All of the above “it ls our our moral responsibilty to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” Se arn cco cneeemanes somes o: memes (2) Churtamageqiamseinem@yabes.compe | ND J NTOR! | CEI res as Hat CRIMINOL Qr ENO we QUESTION Could Alden invoke his constitutional right against Self-incrimination? A. No, because there was no testimonial compulsion B.No, because the prohibition of the use of physical or moral compulsion, to extort communications is simply prohibition against, legal process to extract from the accused’s own lips, against his will an admission of guilt. C.No, because the right against self-incrimination cannot be invoked against object evidence. D. All of the above “it ls our our moral responsibilty to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” What Crimineiogiat Knews? Chariemapne Se Seon mnie coacnemceos Aawos ames, Ee) Cueamepagaarestaaigpabee.seat5 ae i ND | No - « (res at Hat CRIMINOL 3 rr RLNOWe @ QUESTION There is a need for an intervention of a witness for the object evidence being inanimate and cannot speak for itself. This statement is Correct. A.Yes, it is a legal truth that identification precedes authentication and without a witness no evidence can ever be authenticated. B.No, Object evidence is guided under the maxim of Res ipsa Loquitur or the thing speaks for itself. CG. Yes, Object evidence need witness as it is the witness who gather evidence. D.No, Witness or testimonial evidence prevails over Object evidence. “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” nan cco cnmeemcees somes >: memes (2) CourlamageniemsaRine@yabes-comus | ND] 7 Wit CRIMINOL QUESTION These types of demonstrative evidence are presented to indicate the relative locations or positions of objects persons. A. diagrams B. model sketch c. maps D. all of the above “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” ee arn roe cnmeemanes somes >: memes (2) Courtemagenjamsainem@yabes.comQUESTION Demonstrative evidence is applicable to the presentation of A. best evidence B. document c. testimonial D. object “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” ee rn crowns cnmeemenes somes >: memes (2) CurtamagnaiemsaRine@yabes-combate - + J NI Ft] | CI (Tes ara Hat CRIMINOL 5 rr ELNO WE QUESTION Documents written is unofficial language shall not be admitted as evidence EXCEPT A. When accompanied with a translation in the dialect understood by the witnesses B. When translated in Filipino or English by counsels before the trial. C. When translated in a dialect understood by the accused D. All of the above “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” f Whet Crimineiogiat Knows? Chariemapne i Sexes Seatac oan cnacaemceos sawes A ames, Ea) Cheriamepagaaeestaai@pabee.seatbate |e] + J NI Ft] | CI (Tes ara Hat CRIMINOL 5 rr ELNO We QUESTION Ancient document is a private document which is more than years old, produced from a custody in which it A. B. would be naturally found it as genuine. 25 30 35 40 “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” £ Wnt Criminelogiat Knows? Chartamagae i Sere Seoirtacics noes cnacaemcens somes ames, Ee) Cheramepagaarestaai@pabee.seatQUESTION May a private document be offered and admitted in evidence both as documentary evidence and as object evidence? A. Yes, a private document may be offered and admitted in evidence both as documentary evidence and as object evidence depending on the purpose for which the document is offered. Yes, if the document is offered| to prove its existence, condition er for any purpose other than the contents of a document. It is considered as Object evidence. C. Yes, if the doctiment is effered as proof of its contents the same. is considered as. a. documentary evidence. D. All of the above wo “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” Se a rn cca neeemnnes somes >: memes (2) Courlamageqiamsenitem@yabes.comQUESTION May a “fake” document be considered as “original” or “authentic”? A. Yes, a forged or spurious document when presented in court for examination is considered as the original fake or forged document. B. No, the allegedly forged or spurious document is only secondary to the original questioned document. C. Yes, although it was a fake document when it is offered in court it.would be consider as_ public document and an original document. D. No, Fake document carries in itself falsities which could not be accepted in court as authentic and original. “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” Se a rn cca neeemnnes somes >: memes (2) Courlamageqiamsenitem@yabes.compe | ND J NTOR! | CEI res as Hat CRIMINOL rr ENO we QUESTION Of the following which of the document is legally considered original. A. It is the subject of an inquiry B. When in two or more copies executed at or about the same time, with identical contents. Cc. When an entry is repeated in ordinary course of business, one being copied from another at or near the time of the transaction. D. All of the above “it ls our our moral responsibilty to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” Se arn cco cneeemanes somes o: memes (2) Churtamageqiamseinem@yabes.combate |e] + J NI bt] | CI s (Tes ara Hat CRIMINOL LL GNCeh ae QUESTION What kind of document is intervene by a RETIRED RTC JUDGE? A, Public Document B. Private Document Cc. Commercial Document D. Official Document “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” ‘What Crimineiogiat Knows? Chariemapne i Sees Seoretcics oes ctacaemcess Aames ames, [e) Cueramepagaarestaai@paiee.seatbate - + J NI bt] | CI (Tes ara Hat CRIMINOL 5 rr ELNO We QUESTION When an instrument consists partly of written words and partly of a printed form, and the two are inconsistent, what will control? A. . Written words . Testimony . Affidavits vaw Printed form “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” f Whet Crimineiogiat Knew? Chariemapne i Sexes Seatac vias ctacaemceos somes aaes, Ee) Choriamepagaarentaai@paiee.seatbe | ND J NTOR! | CEI (Tes ae Hat CRIMINOL 5 rr ENO QUESTION Which rule of evidence applies only to documents? A. Best evidence B. Privileged communication C. Opinion D. Hearsay “it ls our our moral responsibilty to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” ee nan cco cnmeemcnes somes >: memes (2) Churtamageniemseinem@yabes.comQUESTION The rule is that, there can be no evidence of a writing the contents of which is the subject of inquiry, other than the original writing itself, except in the following cases. A. When the original has been lost, destroyed, or cannot be produced in court; when the original is a record or other document in the custody of a public officer; when the original is in the possession of the party against whom the evidence is offered, the latter fails to produce it after reasonable notice. B. When the original has been recorded in an existing record a certified copy of which is made evidence by law. C. When the original. consists of numerous, accounts) or other documents which cannot be examined in, court without great jloss of time and the fact sought to be established from them is only the general results of the whole. D. All of the above “itis our our moral responsibilty to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them. What Crimineiogiat Knews? Chariemapne James >. Ramee ~ le See Seoeoticice mnie cnacnemceos somos A ames, [e) Cheriamepagaarentaaigpabee.seatbate |e] + J N77] bt] | CI (Tes ara Hat CRIMINOL 5 rr ENO We QUESTION Rule which requires the highest grade of evidence obtainable to prove a disputed fact is the original of a document. A. Parole Evidence Rule B. Best Evidence Rule C. Original of a document D. Secondary Evidence “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” Se a rn crowns cneeemanes somes #: names (2) Curlamagenjansanaemyabes.comQUESTION Parol Evidence is an A. Agreement not included in the document B. Original not included in the document C. Agreement included in the document D. Original included in the document “it ls our our moral responsibilty to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” Se a in crowns cneeemanes somes #: memes (2) Curlamagenjansaiaemyabes.combate |e] + J NI bt] | CE) (Tes ara Hat CRIMINOL 5 rr ENO We QUESTION All persons, having organs of sense, can perceive and perceiving, and can make their perception to others, may be a A. Witness B. Prosecutor C. Defense counsel D. All of the foregoing “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” What Crimineiogiat Knows? Chariemapne i Sree Seoeireticics nies coacaemcens somes A aaes, [a] Cheramepagameentnai@pabes.seatbate |e] + J NI Ft] | CI (Tes ara Hat CRIMINOL 5 rr ELNO We QUESTION Who among the following is disqualified from becoming a witness? A. A person who is interested in the outcome of the case B. A person previously convicted of a crime C. A person who believes in the principle of communism D. None of the above “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” Se a in crowns cneeemanes somes #: momee (2) Curlamageniamsaiaemyabes.compe | ND I NTOR! | CEI s res an Hat CRIMINOL LRG Nreh ns QUESTION Considering the qualifications required of a would-be witness, who among the following is INCOMPETENT to testify? A. Maine who is under the influence of drugs when the event he is asked to testify on took place. B. Alden who is convicted of perjury who will testify as an attesting witness to a will. C. Tidora who is deaf and dumb. D. Cardo who is a mental retardate. “itis our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” Se a San ccoent cneeemanes somes o: mames (2) Curlamapegiansainemyahes-com5 ae | | ND | AA Hat CRIMINOL QUESTION To proye the identity of the assailant in a crime of homicide, police officer Cardo testified that, Alden, who did not testify in court, pointed a finger at the accused in a police lineup. Is the police officer's testimony regarding Alden's identification of the accused admissible evidence? A. Yes, since it is based on his personal knowledge of Alden’s identification of the accused. B.No, since police officer Cardo had the accused identified without warning him of his rights. C. Yes, since it constitutes an independently relevant statement. D. No, since the testimony is hearsay. “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” fF What Crimineiogiat Knows? Chariemapne lo Sees ceeirotncics aaa ceatomceoy somes A aaes, Ee) Cuetamepagaarestaaigpabes.seatbate |e] + J NI bt] | CI (Tes ara Hat CRIMINOL 5 rr ENO We QUESTION To effect the conscience of the witness and compel him to speak the truth and open him for punishment for perjury if he willfully falsely. A. Oath B. Affirmation C. Confession D. Admission “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” What Crimineiogiat Knows? Chariemapne i Sree Seoeireticics nies coacaemcens somes A aaes, [a] Cheramepagameentnai@pabes.seatbate |e] + J NI Ft] | CI (Tes ara Hat CRIMINOL 5 rr ELNO We QUESTION A solemn and formal declaration or assertion that the witness will tell the truth is called: A. Statement B. Promise Cc. Affirmation D. Declaration “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” Se a in crowns cneeemanes somes #: memes (2) Curlamapegiamsaniaem@yabes.comus | ND] 7 WA tT CRIMINOL mt QUESTION What do you call the written record of the court proceedings made by the official stenographer? A. Record B. Transcript c. Entry D. Blotter “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” Se a rn crc nmeemanes somes o: memes (2) Courtamageniamsainem@yahes.com5 ae | i ND | No - « (res a Hat CRIMINOL 3 rr RELNOWE @ QUESTION The record of the proceedings, prepared and signed certified by the official stenographer is a correct statement of such proceedings. I. Deemed I. Admitted III.Prima facie A. 1, II and TIr B. II and III c. I only D. II and I “it ls our our moral responsibilty to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” ee ra rca oneeemeees somes >: memes (2) Courtamageniemseine@yabes.combate |e] + J NI Ft] | CI (Tes ara Hat CRIMINOL 5 rr ELNO We QUESTION After the cross examination of the witness, what is the next procedure? A. Direct examination B. Re-direct examination Cc. Cross examination D. Re-cross examination “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” Se a in crowns cneeemanes somes #: memes (2) Curlamapegiamsaniaem@yabes.com5 ae | | ND J aa Hat CRIMINOL QUESTION The re-examination by counsel of his own witness after examination by the adverse counsel is known as and is a matter of right and not merely a privilege: A. Re-investigation B. Pre-trial examination C. Re-cross examination D. Re-direct examination “it ls our our moral responsibilty to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” Se a an crcee cneeemanes somes o: momee (2) Curlamagegiamseinemyabes.combate |e] + J NI bt] | CI (Tes ara Hat CRIMINOL 5 rr ELNO We QUESTION Give the order in the examination of an individual witness A. Direct exam; re-cross exam; re-direct exam; cross- exam B. Direct exam; cross exam; re-direct; re-cross exam C. Re-cross exam; cross exam; re-direct; direct exam D. Cross-exam; direct exam; xe-cross exam; re-direct exam “it ls our our moral responsibilty to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” f Whet Crimineiagiat Knew? Chariemapne i Sree eesti eas cnacaemceos somos aaes, Ee) Charamepagaaeestaai@pabes.seata ND | NTOR: Lc (Tes ara Hat CRIMINOL 5 rr ELNO We QUESTION The purpose of direct examination is to build an airtight case against the accused. Thus leading question is generally not allowed on direct examination. EXCEPT A. Preliminary matter B. Cross examination C. A feeble mind or deaf mute D. All of the above “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” What Criminetagiat Knows? Chariemapne i Sexes Searhces vias ctacaemcens somes ames, Ee) Choriamepagaarentaai@paiee.seatpe | | ND J NTOR! | CEI Tes an Hat CRIMINOL rr ENO we QUESTION The object of cross-examination is to destroy the facts proved or to demolish or destroy the case of the adversary. However, misleading question is not allowed during cross-examination, that I. One which assumes a fact contrary to which a witness has previously stated II.0ne assumes as true fact’) not) testified to by ‘the witness III.On matters not covered by the direct examination A, 1, EE and 117 B. II and IIr ¢, I only D. Id andr “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” f What Crimineiogiat Knows? Chariemapne i Smee Seoeoticics ncaa cnacnemceos somes aaes, Ee) Cuoramepagaaeentnai@paies.seatSC QUESTION Impeachment of a witness is essentially a cross-examination. The rule is that a witness may be impeached by the party against whom is called by four (4) modes EXCEPT I. By contradictory evidence II. By evidence of particular wrongful acts done by the witness III.By evidence that his general reputation for truth, honesty, or integrity is bad Iy.by evidence that he has made) at other times statements inconsistent with his present testimony V. By record of judgment of that he has been convicted by final judgment of an offense IT only I, IZ, wv 1,12, 127 III and V eee “It Is our our moral responsibility to help others achieve their dreams by guiding and inspiring them. “f. Whet Crimineingiet Knewa? Chertemegae James >. Ramee SD @2Gharinmagnajamenthse ae mn Grammratostat news? Cnartomegne same >, amen \.) CharlomapnsjameshalS@yehes.combate - + J NI Ft] | CI (Tes ara Hat CRIMINOL 5 rr ELNO We QUESTION The general rule is that a party cannot impeach his own witness EXCEPT I. A witness who is ignorant or a child of tender II. The witness is hostile or unwilling III.The witness is an adverse party A. B, ic. D I, If and fIr II and III I only Il and I “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” Se a an crowns cneeemanes somes o: names (2) Churlemapeniamsatiaem@yabes.comQUESTION Requisite before recall of a witness. A. Leading Question B. Misleading Question C. Impeachment D. Leave of Court “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” ee arn roe cnmeemanes somes >: memes (2) Courtemagenjamsainem@yabes.combate - + J NI Ft] | CI (Tes ara Hat CRIMINOL 5 rr ELNO We QUESTION After the examination of a witness by both sides has been concluded, the witness cannot be recalled, EXCEPT I. With leave of court II.As the interest of justice may require III.Upon motion of the accused A. 1, It and r1r B, II and 111 c. I only D. IZ and I “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” Se a an crowns cneeemanes somes o: names (2) Churlemapeniamsatiaem@yabes.comQUESTION The testimony of a single witness, if positive, clear, straightforward, convincing and credible is sufficient to support a conviction in a case or murder. A. Agree - because even if not corroborated since evidence is considered not according to plurality of the witness but to weight and credibility of a single witness. B. Disagree - because the testimony of a single witness is uncorroborated and therefore no legal to stand on. C. Agree - A single witness is enough as it requires only an evidence of greater weight. D. Disagree - A single Witness is not enough in criminal cases there is a need for preponderance of evidence. “it ls our our moral responsibilty to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” f Wmat Crimineiagiat Knows? Chariemapne lo See ceeioticins noes cnatmceoy somes A. aaron, Ee) Cheamepagamrestaaigpabee.seatus | ND J 7 WA t CRIMINOL QUESTION Can a husband testify against the wife in an adultery case? A. Yes, the privilege of marital communication rule is already abolished B. Yes, under the law she is a competent witness C. Yes, because crime charge is one committed by wife against the husband D. No, the privilege of marital communication rule is already abolished “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” What Crimineiagiat Knows? Chartamapne lim tence crammetagies smowe? cnartomegns somes P. Aames (2) Chertemegaafemeshnt@ivehes.c0a05 ae | | ND I an Hat CRIMINOL QUESTION Alden testify against Yayadub. A. B. Admissible, by reason of that the offense was committed against him. Admissible, the suit is a criminal case an Adultery. . Admissible, it is the exception of marital privilege. - All of the above “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” What Crimineiogiat Knows? Chariemapne i Sree Seoeireticics nies coacaemcens somes A aaes, [a] Cheramepagameentnai@pabes.seatbe | ND J NTOR! | CEI (Tes an Hat CRIMINOL rr ENO we QUESTION Aldub testify against Yayadub A. Admissible, Yayadub cannot invoke parental privilege. B. Admissible, the privilege belongs to their child. C. Aldub may testify if he wants to, he may not be compelled. D. All of the above “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” Se a aan crowns cneeemanes somes 0: memes (2) Curlamapegjansaiaemyabes.combe | ND I -NTOR! | CEI (Tes an Hat CRIMINOL rr ENO we QUESTION Dr. Bayer Testify against Yayadub A. Admissible, by reason of that it applies only to criminal cases. B. Admissible, the suit is a criminal case an Adultery. C. Admissible, it is an exception of Doctor-Patient Privlege. D. All of the above “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” Se a in crowns cneeemanes somes #: memes (2) Curlamapegiamsaniaem@yabes.combate |e] + J NI Ft] | CI (Tes ara Hat CRIMINOL 5 rr ELNO We QUESTION This are communications received in confidence by a person from another by reason of trust or intimate relationship may not be revealed to the court A. Parental privilege B. Filial privilege C. Husband-Wife privilege D. All of the above “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” What Crimineiogiat Knows? Chariemapne i Sexes Scotti conse cnacnemceos Aames aaes, [e) Cheramepagaaeestaai@pabes.seat5 ae | | ND I ara Hat CRIMINOL QUESTION The following persons cannot testify as to matters learned in confidence from one another A. Parent B. Filial C. Husband-Wife D. All of the above “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” Se a rn crowns cneeemanes somes #: names (2) Curlamagenjansanaemyabes.combate - + J NI bt] | CI (Tes ara Hat CRIMINOL 5 rr ELNO We QUESTION Which of the following Disqualification by reason of privilege communication may not be waived? A. Husband and Wife privilege communication B. Attorney-client privilege commnication C. Priest and Penitent privilege commnication D. Public officer privilege communication “it ls our our moral responsibilty to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” Se a aan croese cneeemanes somes #: momee (2) Curlamapegiamsaiaemyabes.comus | ND] 7 WA tT CRIMINOL QUESTION Testimonial privilege includes A. Parental Privilege B. Filial Privilege C. Parents cannot be compelled to testify against his descendants D. All of the above “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” “f What Criminetagiat Knows? Chariemapne im tence cramimategies mowe? cnartomeges somes P. Acmes (2) Chertemegaajemeshn@ivehes.c000QUESTION To prove that Maine stabbed her husband Alden, Tidora testified that she heard Pastillas Girl running down the street of Kalye Serye, shouting excitedly, "Sinaksaw daw ni Maine ang asawa niya! (I heard that Maine is stabbing her husband!)" Is Pastillas Girl's statement as narrated by Tidora admissible? A. Yes, as part of the res gestae. B. No, since the excited statement is itself hearsay. C. Yes, as an independently relevant statement. D. No, since the startling event had passed. “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” f Wmet Crimineiogiat Knows? Chariemapne i See ceerotncics moans cnactomceoy somes Ac aaes, [) Cueramepagmrentaaipabes.seatQUESTION As a general rule, hearsay evidence is A. Credible B. Competent C. Admissible D. Inadmissible “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” What Crimineiagiat Knew? Chariamapne lim seme coamsatagies nowe? cmartomeges somes P. Aames (2) ChertemegaajemeshnS@ivehes.coasbate |e] + J NI bt] | CI (Tes ara Hat CRIMINOL 5 rr ELNO We QUESTION It is statement whose value is independent of truth or falsity. The mere fact of it utterance is relevant. A. Hearsay statement B. Independent relevant statement C. Declaration against interest D. Dying Declaration “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” What Crimineiogiat Knows? Chariemapne i See Seoireticics oes cnacaemceos somos A aaes, Ee) Cueramepagaarestnai@pabes.seatQUESTION A group of 4 persons, Alpha, Bravo and Charlie and Delta robbed a house. When they were fleeing after the robbery they were intercepted by the police and as a result Alpha was mortally wounded. Before he died, but conscious of his impending death, “Alpha” admitted participation in the robbery, and named Bravo, Charlie and Delta as his companions. Hence, Bravo, Charlie and Delta were charged for the death of policeman? What is the nature of declaration of Alpha? Decide. A. Not a dying declaration because the subject of inquiry is the death of the policeman. B. The declaration does not refer to Alpha’s death. €. It is neither an inquiry to the death of Alpha. D. All of the above “it ls our our moral responsibilty to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” Se rn crowns cnmeemenes somes >: memes (2) Courtamageniamsenine@yabes.combe | ND J NTO: | CEI Tes an Hat CRIMINOL Qr ELwvo we QUESTION Which of the following is NOT REQUIRED of a declaration against interest as an exception to the hearsay rule? A. The declarant is dead or unable to testify. B. At the time he made said declaration he was unaware that the same was contrary to his aforesaid interest. C. The declaration relates to a fact against the interest of the declarant. D. The declarant had no motive to falsify and believed such declaration to be true. “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” Se a aan crowns cneeemanes somes 0: names (2) Curlamapeajansanaemyabes-combate |e] + J NI bt] | CI (Tes ara Hat CRIMINOL 5 rr ENO We QUESTION Refers to the family history or descendant transmitted from one generation to another. A. Pedigree B. Reputation c. Privies D. All of the above “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” What Crimineiogiat Knows? Chariemapne i Sexes Scotti conse cnacnemceos Aames aaes, [e) Cheramepagaaeestaai@pabes.seatz | AND I No as EL CRIMINOLOGI QUESTION Mr. X was shot with .45 pistel after 2 hours. He was visited by Mr. Y at the hospital where he was immediately brought before treatment of the gunshot wound. Mr. X told Mr. ¥ that it was Mr. 2 who shot him. Forwith, Mr. ¥ who is a law graduate took the initiative of taking down in long hand the statement of Mr. X who narrated the events surrounding ad the categorically stated that it was Mr. Z who shot him. Ten days after Mr. X died as the consequence of the gunshot wound. The statement of Mr. ¥ may be received evidence as? A. part of res gestae B. dying declaration C. A and B is correct D. none of the above “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” Se a rn cca neeemnnes somes >: memes (2) Courlamageqiamsenitem@yabes.comQUESTION Alden and Cardo are very good friends. Cardo has been asking Alden whether he was legally married with Maine to which Alden has repeatedly evaded. One day Alden was stabbed and his friend Cardo rushed to him and after assisting him Cardo reiterated his question to Alden whether Maine whom he was living was his legal wife. Conscious of his impending to death, Alden admitted that said woman, is only his mistress. The declaration is A. Dying declaration B. Res gestae C. Adoptive omission D. none of the above “it ls our our moral responsibilty to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” Se arn cco cneeemanes somes o: memes (2) Churtamageqiamseinem@yabes.compe | ND J NTOR! | CEI res as Hat CRIMINOL Qr ENO we QUESTION How may, an ordinary citizen gives his opinion regarding the handwriting of a person? A. When he has testify only as to the mental and emotional state of the one who authored the handwriting B. When it is the handwriting of one whom he has sufficient familiarity C. When he is a questioned document examiner D. None of the above “it ls our our moral responsibilty to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” What Crimineiogiat Knews? Chariemapne Se Seon mnie coacnemceos Aawos ames, Ee) Cueamepagaarestaaigpabee.seatbate |e] + J NI Ft] | CI (Tes ara Hat CRIMINOL 5 rr ELNO We QUESTION When the judge directed the prosecutor to ‘qualify the witness’, what does it mean? Witness is? A. To take an oath B. An expert witness C. Ready for trial D. Due for cross examination “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” Se a in crowns cneeemanes somes #: memes (2) Curlamapegiamsaniaem@yabes.combe | ND I NTOR! | CEI Tes a Hat CRIMINOL rr ENO we QUESTION Character evidence is admissible A. When it is evidence of the good character of a witness even prior to impeachment. B. In criminal cases, the prosecution may prove the bad moral character of the accused'to prove his criminal predisposition. Cc. In criminal cases, the bad moral character of the offended party may not be proved. D. In criminal cases, the accused may prove his good moral character if pertinent to the moral trait involved in the offense charged. “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and inspiring them.” Se a rn cca neeemnnes somes >: memes (2) Courlamageqiamsenitem@yabes.com5 ae | i ND | No « (res aa Hat CRIMINOL 3 Qr ENO We @ QUESTION Cardo testified that Alden, was charged with robbery, has committed bag-snatching three times on the street of Kalye Serye in the last six months. Can the court admit this testimony as evidence against Alden? A. No, since there is no showing that Cardo witnessed the past three robberies. B. Yes, as evidence of his past’ propensity for committing robbery. C.¥es, as evidence of a pattern of criminal behavior proving his guilt of the present offense. D.No, since evidence of guilt of a past crime is not evidence of guilt of a present crime. “it ls our our moral responsibility to help others achieve thelr dreams by guiding and Inspiring them.” fF What Crimineiogiat Knows? Chariemapne lo Sees ceeirotncics aaa ceatomceoy somes A aaes, Ee) Cuetamepagaarestaaigpabes.seat