Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1993 Jacob The Composition of NaturaJ Latex
1993 Jacob The Composition of NaturaJ Latex
Introduction
Hevea brasiliensis is the source of "natural" latex. Latex
s y n t h e t i z e d in a network of laticiferous rings organized as
paracirculatory vessels systems, in the inner bark of the tree, is
collected by periodic incision of the bark (tapping). Latex is the
cytoplasm of the laticiferous cells; its organominerat composition
has all the features of ordinary plant cytoplasm except tha t it
contains 30-45% rubber and the nuclei and mitochondria are not
expelled during tapping. However, the major metabolism of these
cells is the conversion of sucrose into cis-polyisoprene, and the
major part of the enzymes involved in this process is located in
the cytosol, with a lot of other proteins. Unlike ordinary plant
cells, the cells that form the laticiferous vessels do not possess
large single vacuoles but a large numbe r of lysosomal micro-
vacuoles:tutoids. In addition to the organic and mineral solutes
with low molecular weight that are accumulated by active trans-
location, tutoids contain large quantities of anionic and cationic
proteins~ Some of these (heveamines) have chitinase/lysozyme
type enzymatic properties. Others, such as heveine, can bind to
chitin and are fungitoxic; hevein has considerable structural analogy
Lutoids
Lutoids are small, 2-5-gin single-membrane vesicles (7).
T h e y form a polydispersed, l y s o s o m a l vacuole (15) a n d form
10-20% of latex volume (1). They are directly involved in cellular
LAT~CIFEROUS LEAVES
CELL
1
%
L,
SUCROSE
SUCROSE 4
VASCULAR
pIEp.~-QORGAN,C AC.
RAY J
PYRUYATE 10NS
H20
IONS ~1 \ 9~ ~ AM AC
H20
CRUDE SIEVE
~LYSOMES SIEVE
TUBE
RNA
FLOW Z~ LEUS
444,,
ENOLS
Fig. 2. Scheme of Hevea brasiliensis laticiferous system. Shown are its sucrose,
water, organic, and inorganic elements loading via medullary rays and sieve tubes,
its different cellular organits, and the major biochemical pathway leading to the
polyisoprene (rubber) synthesis (adapted from Jacob) (1).
Frey- ~ Carotenoids
- Wyssling Plastochromanol
particles O t her lipids
- Inositols
-
1.0-1.5
-- Carbohydrates
-- Proteins
0.5
--Glutathione
0.01
F r e s h latex _ Serum - a m i n o acids
- F r e e
48 0.08
-- Ascorbic acid
0,02
-- O t her organic acids
- - Nitrogenous bases
0.04
- - Nucleic acids
0.002
- - Mononucleotides
0.02
- - Proteins
0.2
-- P h o s p h o l i p i d s
Bottom - -Plastoquinone
- fraction -- U b i q u i n o l
15 - -Sterols
- -Trigonelline
0.007
- -Ergothioneine
0-0.05
"Adapted from Archer et al. (27).
ZThe figures under the components indicate their approximate concentra-
tions in g/t00 g of tatex.
Table 2
Cytosolic and Lutoidic Sera Compositions
of Latex from Hevea brasiliensis
Concentrations (mM)
Ratio
Lutoids lutoids/
Solutes (vacuoles) Cytosol cytosol
K§ 31.2 30.1 1.0
Mg 2+ 64.2 8.3 8.0
Ca 2+ 1.5i 0.25 6.0
Cu 2~ 0.047 0.021 2.0
Pi 76 9.1 8.7
Sucrose 5.8 40.5 0.]_
Citrate 53.0 5.7 9.3
Malate 17.3 14.6 1.2
Amino acids
Acidic 22.9 56.9 0.4
Neutral 21.1 36.4 0.6
Basic 56.9 6.6 8.6
Adapted from d'Auzac and Jacob (32).
elements, such as Mg 2+, citrate, Pi, Ca 2+, and basic amino acids.
However, they contain very little sucrose, and their K + and malate
contents are similar to that of the cytosol. This characteristic,
resulting from the functioning of the lutoids, highlights their role
in cell homeostasis (21).
Amino Acids
Distribution between basic, neutral, and acid groups is shown
in Table 2. Glutamate, glutamine, alanine, and aspartic acid are
quantitatively the most important and form 81% of total cytosol
amino acids (39).
Nitrogenous Bases
Some authors (27) have reported the presence of nitrogen
bases, such as methylamine, tetramethylene-diamine, penta-
methyl-diamine, trigonelline, and stachydrine. Etha nola mine is
mentioned by Brzozowska-Hanower et al. (40).
Reducing Agents
Reducing agents play a major antisenescent role in the cells
(16). Thiols are mainly represented by glutathion, found at a con-
centration of about 1 mM and cysteine, whose level does not
exceed 0.5 mM (40). The ascorbic acid content is 2-5 mM (32).
Nucleotides and Nucleic Acids
Phosphate nucleotides are represented m a i n l y by phosphate
adenosines (<0.5 raM), but phosphate uridines (including UDPG)
and phosphate cytidines are also found (32). Although the NAD
content has been assessed at about 40 t~//, no NADH or NADP(H)
has been detected (41). RNA and the relative proportions oftRNA
and rRNA have also been studied (42). However, no trace of DNA
has been detected, which confirms the retention of nuclei and
mitochondria in situ during tapping.
Calmodulin
It should be noted that this molecule, classically involved
with Ca 2+in intracellular regulation, has been found in nonnegli-
gible quantities in latex cytosol (43,44).
Proteins
Cytosol proteins are extremely numerous, forming 0.6% by
weight of fresh latex. Some may play an allergenic role (23). A
relatively abundant globulin whose isoelectric point is 4.55 was
found by Archer et al. (27). It appears to be able to combine closely
with the envelope of rubber particles and thus affect the colloidal
stability of latex. Nearly 100 enzymes involved in the general
Conclusion
Hevea brasiliensis latex collected by t a p p i n g can be consid-
ered as cytoplasm, in spite of the absence of nucleus and mito-
chondrial material, tt possesses the complexity of cytoplasm both
in its subcellular organization and the diversity of the constituent
molecules. Its essential characteristic is the high rubber content.
Rubber is a very long chain cis-polyisoprene polymer synthesized
in the cytosot compartment. Rubber forms 90% of latex dry weight
and 40% of fresh weight, which underlines the astonishing domi-
nance of this anabolic p a t h w a y in the laticiferous metabolism.
However, the p r e p a r a t i o n of dry rubber or concentrated latex as
used in i n d u s t r y removes a fairly large proportion of the mineral
and organic solutes from fresh latex. Latex processing conditions
in p l a n t a t i o n factories can considerably modify the technological
properties of r u b b e r after vulcanization t h r o u g h the influence of
the n a t u r e and proportion of the residual n o n r u b b e r substances.
Some of these give n a t u r a l rubber properties t h a t are still better
t h a n those of synthetic cis-polyisoprene.
In contrast, it appears to have been clearly d e m o n s t r a t e d
t h a t the proteins extracted from latex or from rubber tree leaves
containing latex display allergenic properties (46,47). T u r j a n m a a
et al. (48) observed t h a t allergenic proteins extracted from latex
gloves have molecular weights of between 2 and 30 k D a and are
t h u s similar to various allergens, including those of pollen. It h a s
been mentioned t h a t large quantities of proteins with low molec-
u l a r weights are found in latex.
References
1. Compagnon, P. (!986), Le CaoutchoucNaturel(Coste, R., ed.), Maisonneuve
et Larose, Paris, pp. t9-117.
2. d'Auzac, J., Jacob, J. L., and Chrestin, H. (1989), Physiology of Rubber Tree
Latex. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 470 p.
3. Dickenson, P. B. (1969), J. Rub& Res. inst. Malaya 2t~ 543-559.
4~ Hebant, C. and de Faij, E. (1980), Z. PflanzenphysioL 97 S, 391-393.
5. Buttery, B. R. and Boatman, S. G. (1966), J. Exp. BoL 18,644-659.
6. Gomez, J. B. and Moir, G. F. J. (1979), The Ultracytotogy of Latex Vessel in
Hevea brasiliensis. Monography no. 4. Malaysian Rubber Research Devel-
opment Board, Kuala Lumpur, 76 p.
7. Moir, G. F. and Tara, S. J. (1959), Nature 184, 1626-1628.
8. Southorn, W. A. (1969), J. Rub& Res. Inst. Malaya 21,494-512.
9. Hasma, H. and Subramauian, A. (1986), J. Nat. Rubb. Res. 1, 30-40.
10. Archer, B. L., Barnard, B. G., Cockbain, E. G., Oickenson, P. B., and Hang,
T. C. (1963), Chemistry and Physics of Rubber Like Substance (Baterman,
L., ed.), McLaren and Son, New York, pp. 43-57.
11. Dennis, M. S. and Light, D. R. (1989), J. Biol. Chem. 264, 18,608-18,617.
12. Dennis, M. S., Henzel, W. J., Bell, J., Kohr, W., and Light, Do R. (1989), J.
Biol. Chem. 264, 18,618-18,626.
13. Attanyaka, D. P. S., Kekwick, Ro G. O., and Franklin, F. C. H. (1991), Plant
Mol. Biol. 16,1079-1081.
14. Kush, A. (1991), Private communication.
15. Pujarniscle, S. (1968), Physiol. Vgg. 6, 27-46.
16o Chrestin, H. (1988), La Vacuole dans l'homgostasie et la senescence des Cel-
lules laticit~res d'Hevea. ORSTOM, Paris, pp. 575.
17o Dupont, J., Moreau, F., Lance, C., and Jacob, Jo L. (1985), Phytochemistry
15, 1215-1217.
18. d'Auzac, J. (1975), Physiol. V#g~ 12, 617-635.
19. Chrestin, H., Gidrol, X., Matin, B., Jacob, J. L., and d'Auzac, J. (1984), Zo
Pflanzenphysiol., 114,269-277.
20. Pr~vSt, J. C., Siswanto, Clement, A., and Jacob, J. L. (1991), C. R. Acad.
Sci. Paris (series III), 313,293-298.
21. Chrestin, H., Marin, B., Jacob, J. L., and d'Auzac, J. (1989), Physiology of
Rubber Tree Latex (d'Auzac, J., Jacob, J. L., and Chrestin, H., eds.), CRC,
Boca Raton, FL, pp. 165-178.
22. Moir, G. F. J~ and Tara, S. J. (1960), J. Rubb. Res. inst. Malaya 16,155-167.
23. Karunakaran, A, Moir, G. F. J., and Tata, S. J. (1960), Proceeding of Natu-
ral Rubber Research Conference (Rubber Research Institute of Malaya, ed.),
Kuala Lumpur, pp. 798-80&
24. Walujono, K., Scholma, R. A., Beintema, J. J., Maisiano, A, and Hahn, A.
M. (1975), Proceeding of International Rubber Conference (Rubber Research
Institute of Malaya ed.), 3, 518-531.
25. Broekaert, W., Lee, H. I, Kush, A., Chua, N. H., and Raikhel, N. (t990),
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87, 7633-7637.
26. Van Parijs, J., Broekaert, W. F, Goldstein, I. J., and Peunmans, W. J. (1991),
Planta 183, 258-264.
27. Archer, B. L., Audley, B. J., McSweeney, Go P., and Hong, T. C. (1969), J.
Rub& Res. Inst. Malaysia 21,561-569.
28. Tara, S. J., Boyce, A, N., Archer, B. L., and Audtey, B. G. (1976), J. Rub&
Res. Inst. Malaysia 24, 233-236.
29. Martin, M. N. (1991), Plant PhysioL 95, 469-476.
30. Jacob, J. L., Pr6v6t, J. C., and Kekwick, R. G. O. (1989), Physiology of Rub-
ber Tree Latex (d'Auzac, J., Jacob, J. L., and Chrestin, H., eds.), CRC,
Boca Raton, FL, pp. 101-144.
31. Frey Wyssling, A. (1929), Arch. Rubbercult. t3, 394-398.
32. d'Auzac, J., and Jacob, J. L. (!989), Physiology of Rubber Tree Latex
(d'Auzac, J., Jacob, J. L., and Chrestin, H., eds.), CRC, Boca Raton, FL,
pp. 59-96.
33. Coup~, M. and d'Auzac, J. (1972), C R Acad. Sci. Paris (series D), 274~
1031-1034.
34. Pujade-Renaud, V. (1991), Private communication.
35. Lynen, F. (1969), J. Rubb. Res. Inst. Malaya 21,389-406.
36. Tupy, J. (1989), Physiology of Rubber Tree Latex (d'Auzac, J., Jacob, J. L.,
and Chrestin, H., eds.), CRC, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 59-96.
37. Low, F. C. and Gomez, J. B. (1982), J. Rubb. Res. Inst. Malaya 30, 1-18.
38. d'Auzac, J. (1965), Th~se Doctorat d'Etat, Universit~ de Paris, pp. 166.
39. Brzozowska-Hanower, J., Hanower, P., and Chezeau P. (1974), Experientia
30, 894-895.
40. McMullen, A. I. (1960), Biochem. Biophys. Acta 41, 152-159.
41. Jacob, J. L. (1970), Th~se Doctorat d'Etat, Universit~ d'Orsay, pp. 195.
42. Tupy, J. (1968), J. Rubb. Res. Inst. Malaya 21,468-476.
43. Chrestin, H. (1986), Private communication.
44. Wititsuwannakul, R. (1987), Private communication.
45. Lynn, K. R., Clevette-Radford, N. A. (1986), Phytochemistry 25, 2279-2282.
46. Carillo, T., Cuevas, M., Munoz, T., Hinojosa, M., and Moneo, I. (1986), Der-
matotogic Clinics 15, 69-72.
47. Pecquet, C., Leynadier, F., and Dry, J. (1969), Mddecine et Hygiene 46,
967-968.
48. Turjanmaa, K., Lavrita, K., Soili, M~nen-Kiljunen, and Reunala, T. (1988),
Contact Dermatitis 19, 362-367.