Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.emeraldinsight.com/1355-5855.htm
3. Methodology
3.1 The questionnaire design and appraisal of the scale
A questionnaire was designed to measure service quality, to evaluate the customers’
satisfaction and trust and to assess the sentimental and behavioral dimensions of their
Figure 1.
Proposed research
framework
loyalty toward their online service providers. The questionnaire of the study will now be Perceived
described.
The questionnaire was divided into three parts. It began with the general information
service quality
pertaining to respondents’ internet usage and their perceptions of the online products or dimensions
services.
Part two dealt with the respondents’ assessment of the service quality, satisfaction,
trust, and loyalty constructs (see Appendix). The perceived service quality construct was
based on the traditional SERVQUAL conceptualization (Parasuraman et al., 1985, 1988) 359
in an e-commerce setting (Ribbink et al., 2004), which employed 20 Likert-scale items.
The customer satisfaction (four related items), trust (five related items) and loyalty (four
related items) included measures from a scale by Ribbink et al. (2004). All items were
measured with a six-point modified Likert-scale, anchored by (1) strongly disagree and
(6) strongly agree. The rating scales of this research, which did not have a mid-point,
were used to minimize social desirability bias arising from respondents’ desires to please
the interviewer or appear helpful (Garland, 1991). Moreover, the surveys were conducted
in a conservative market where respondents were more guarded in offering praises.
Part three consisted of a series of respondents’ demographic and socio-economic
characteristics such as ethnicity, gender, age, marital status, education, and income.
This information was asked at the end of the questionnaire because of its private and
personal nature.
4. Results
4.1 Demographics profile
Of a total of 600 questionnaires distributed 357 respondents responded, yielding a
response rate of 59.5 percent. The final composition of the sample comprised 57 percent
Malaysians and 43 percent Qataris. Majority of the respondents (99.2 percent) have
used e-services (e.g. e-ticketing, hotel reservation) before. Respondents between 22 and
APJML 30 years of age represent 39 percent of the sample and those between 31 and 40 years
22,3 represent 22 percent. About 50 percent of the respondents are single with 52 percent
being male. Of the sample, 67 percent of the respondents have at least a Bachelor’s
degree and 65 percent have a profession either in a public or a private sector. Finally,
19 percent of respondents have monthly salary of less than US$1,000. About 19 percent
of the respondents have a monthly salary of between US$1,500 and US$3,000 and
360 13 percent of them have monthly salary of above US$3,000, while 32 percent of the
respondents did not wish to disclose their salary. However, it should be noted that since
we have a convenience sample, we could not get a matched profile of respondents from
the two countries. There is a significant difference among the two groups of
respondents in terms of age and occupation. To correct for the difference in the
demographic variables between the two groups, we included these demographic
factors in the final model. The representativeness of the sample of respondents could
not be compared with the population from which the sample was drawn because there
was no other survey or data about the population of e-commerce users in Malaysia and
Qatar available.
Notes: aA just-identified model with perfect fit (Hair et al., 2006); 2 ¼ chi square; d.f. ¼ degree Table I.
of freedom; GFI ¼ goodness of fit index; CFI ¼ comparative fit index; RMSEA ¼ root mean The measures and their
square error of approximation psychometric properties
APJML Mean SD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
22,3
(1) EOU 4.632 0.870 0.63 – – – – – – – –
(2) WEB 4.591 0.814 0.63 0.56 – – – – – – –
(3) RESP 4.181 0.949 0.50 0.46 0.55 – – – – – –
(4) CUST 4.279 0.849 0.54 0.54 0.58 0.55 – – – – –
(5) ASSURE 3.932 1.179 0.39 0.42 0.38 0.50 0.73 – – – –
362 (6) SAT 4.455 0.882 0.56 0.56 0.47 0.52 0.54 0.64 – – –
(7) TRUST 3.578 1.102 0.39 0.40 0.37 0.52 0.54 0.45 0.56 – –
(8) WOM 4.555 1.073 0.56 0.54 0.37 0.51 0.46 0.60 0.56 0.87 –
(9) INTENT 4.342 1.021 0.53 0.48 0.50 0.53 0.49 0.61 0.50 0.70 0.63
Table II.
Scale development Notes: EOU ¼ ease of use; WEB ¼ website design or layout; Resp ¼ responsiveness;
sample factor means, CUST ¼ customization; Assure ¼ assurance; SAT ¼ satisfaction; TRUST ¼ trust; WOM ¼ word-
standard deviations, of-mouth; INTENT ¼ intention; in italic is the AVE; all correlations are significant at p < 0.01
and correlations (two-tailed)
5. Discussion of results
The final and parsimonious model of the relationships is shown in Table III. First, we
tested the relationship of ease of use website design, responsiveness, customization,
and assurance on customer satisfaction. The standardized path coefficients () support
that quality is an antecedent and that it positively affects customer satisfaction (see
Cronin and Taylor, 1992). However, only the coefficients of ease of use ( ¼ 0.213;
tvalue ¼ 2.791), website design ( ¼ 0.239; tvalue ¼ 2.969), and assurance
( ¼ 0.325; tvalue ¼ 5.735) are significant with satisfaction while coefficient of
responsiveness ( ¼ 0.107; tvalue ¼ 1.669) and customization ( ¼ 0.095;
tvalue ¼ 1.175) are not. Thus, H3 and H4 are rejected. A possible explanation for this
phenomenon could be that the collectivist consumers are probably more tolerant and
Independent Dependent Estimate Perceived
Hypothesis variable variable () tvalue Fvalue pvalue Results service quality
SEM analysis
dimensions
H1 EOU SAT 0.213 2.791 0.005* Accepted
H2 WEB SAT 0.239 2.969 0.003* Accepted
H3 RESP SAT 0.107 1.669 0.095 Rejected
H4 CUST SAT 0.095 1.175 0.240 Rejected 363
H5 ASSURE SAT 0.325 5.735 0.000* Accepted
H7 SAT TRUST 0.566 7.215 0.000* Accepted
H9 SAT WOM 0.502 7.833 0.000* Accepted
H11 SAT INTENT 0.369 5.684 0.000* Accepted
H13 TRUST WOM 0.312 5.077 0.000* Accepted
H15 TRUST INTENT 0.042 0.733 0.463 Rejected
H17 WOM INTENT 0.571 8.937 0.000* Accepted
Fit indices Statistics d.f. p
2 1106.62 413 0.000*
GFI 0.83
CFI 0.90
RMSEA 0.06
General linear model of univariate analysis of variance
H6a EOU*CULTURE SAT 1.382 0.115 Rejected
H6b WEB*CULTURE SAT 1.108 0.351 Rejected
H6c RESP*CULTURE SAT 0.592 0.948 Rejected
H6d CUST*CULTURE SAT 0.478 0.971 Rejected
H6e ASSURE*CULTURE SAT 0.956 0.518 Rejected
H8 SAT*CULTURE TRUST 1.772 0.028** Accepted
H10 SAT*CULTURE WOM 1.215 0.249 Rejected
H12 SAT*CULTURE INTENT 0.934 0.549 Rejected
H14 TRUST*CULTURE WOM 0.989 0.496 Rejected
H16 TRUST*CULTURE INTENT 1.323 0.135 Rejected
H18 WOM*CULTURE INTENT 0.740 0.839 Rejected
Notes: EOU ¼ ease of use; WEB ¼ website design or layout; Resp ¼ responsiveness; Table III.
CUST ¼ customization; Assure ¼ assurance; SAT ¼ satisfaction; TRUST ¼ trust; WOM ¼ word- SEM and general linear
of-mouth; INTENT ¼ intention; CULTURE ¼ Age*Occupation: 2 ¼ chi square; d.f. ¼ degree of model of univariate
freedom; GFI ¼ goodness of fit index; CFI ¼ comparative fit index; RMSEA ¼ root mean square analysis of variance
error of approximation; *p < 0.01; **p < 0.05 results
less demanding compared to the individualistic customers (see Table III). The
independent variables (ease of use, website, and assurance) explain 63.0 percent of the
variance of customer satisfaction. Therefore, H1, H2, and H5 are substantiated.
Second, we examined H7 that dealt with the relationship between customer
satisfaction and trust. Interestingly, the results of the analysis indicate that customer
satisfaction ( ¼ 0.566; tvalue ¼ 7.215) is an antecedent of trust. As such, satisfaction
does appear to be an important factor in building trust among the online users. Thus,
H7 is supported (see Table III).
Third, we tested the direct effect of customer satisfaction and trust on customer
loyalty. The argument that satisfaction and trust are antecedents and positively related
to loyalty is also supported by the findings. Table III shows that the path coefficients
from satisfaction to WOM ( ¼ 0.502; tvalue ¼ 7.833) and from trust to WOM
( ¼ 0.961; tvalue ¼ 2.869) are significant, where, they explain 53.4 percent of WOM’s
APJML Hypothesis Supported
22,3
H1. Ease of use is positively related to customer satisfaction Accepted
H2. Website design is positively related to customer satisfaction Accepted
H3. Responsiveness is positively related to customer satisfaction Rejected
H4. Customization is positively related to customer satisfaction Rejected
H5. Assurance is positively related to customer satisfaction Accepted
364 H6a. The effect of ease of use on customer satisfaction is greater for Qatari Rejected
than for Malaysian customers
H6b. The effect of website design on customer satisfaction is greater for Qatari Rejected
than for Malaysian customers
H6c. The effect of responsiveness on customer satisfaction is greater for Qatari Rejected
than for Malaysian customers
H6d. The effect of customization on customer satisfaction is greater for Qatari Rejected
than for Malaysian customers
H6e. The effect of assurance on customer satisfaction is greater for Qatari than Rejected
for Malaysian customers
H7. Customer satisfaction is positively related to trust Accepted
H8. The effect of customer satisfaction on trust is greater for Qataris than for Accepted
Malaysians
H9. Customer satisfaction is positively related to WOM Accepted
H10. The effect of customer satisfaction on WOM is greater for Qataris than for Rejected
Malaysians
H11. Customer satisfaction is positively related to INTENT Accepted
H12. The effect of customer satisfaction on intentions is greater for Qataris Rejected
than for Malaysians
H13. Trust is positively related to WOM Accepted
H14. The effect of trust on WOM is greater for Qataris than for Malaysians Rejected
H15. Trust is positively related to intentions Rejected
H16. The effect of trust on intentions is greater for Qataris than for Malaysians Rejected
Table IV. H17. WOM is positively related to intentions Accepted
Summary of results H18. The effect of WOM on intentions is greater for Qataris than for Rejected
of hypotheses Malaysians
variance. Thus, H9 and H13 are supported. It should be noted, however, that when
examining the direct effect of satisfaction and trust on intentions, only satisfaction
appears to have positive and significant impact on customers ( ¼ 0.369;
tvalue ¼ 5.864). Hence, H11 is supported and H15 is rejected. This could be a specific
characteristic of the collectivist culture where individuals belong to groups that look
after them in exchange for loyalty.
Fourth, we examined H17 deals with the direct effect of WOM on intention. Our
inspection of the path coefficient found that WOM does influence intention ( ¼ 0.571;
tvalue ¼ 8.937). This confirms our hypothesis that emotional loyalty does influence
positively the customers’ behavioral loyalty, where it explains 79.8 percent of
intention’s variance (see Table III).
Fifth, we tested H6a-e, H8, H10, H12, H14, H16, and H18, which compare the
effect of the perceived service quality dimensions, satisfaction, trust, and customer
loyalty between two cultures (i.e. Malaysian and Qatari). AMOS is unable to measure
the effect of the interaction terms between culture on one hand and EOU, WEB, RESP,
CUST ASSURE, SAT, TRUST, WOM, and INTENT on the other hand. Therefore, we
used general linear model of univariate analysis of variance (SPSS 13). H6a-e stipulates
that the impact of EOU, WEB, RESP, CUST, and ASSURE on SAT is greater for Qatari
than for Malaysian users. The results indicate that the interaction between these Perceived
service quality dimensions and culture are insignificant in determining SAT. Thus, the
effect of service quality dimensions on satisfaction on both Qatari and Malaysian users
service quality
is the same. Consequently, H6a-e is not supported. With respect to the effect of dimensions
satisfaction, the results show that the interaction between SAT and culture is
significant in determining TRUST (Fvalue ¼ 1.772; pvalue ¼ 0.028). The impact of
satisfaction on trust is greater for Qatari than for Malaysian users. Therefore, H8 is
supported. As for H10, H12, H14, H16, and H18 the results show that they are 365
insignificant. Therefore, H10, H12, H14, H16, and H18 are not supported.
The research hypotheses were confirmed and disconfirmed through SEM and
general linear model of univariate analysis of variance in order of their presentation as
summarized in Table IV. Nine of the hypotheses were fully supported and 13 were
rejected. The limitations and implications of these results will now be described in the
following sections.
6. Limitations
As in any study, there are a few limitations of the current research that should be
understood when interpreting the results and implications. First, the convenience
sampling used was not random and it is difficult to obtain a fully matched profile of
respondents from Malaysia and Qatar. Although this issue has been rectified, we
believed that a selection of a sample where respondents from the two countries have a
matched profile might lead to better results. Finally, it is fruitful to replicate this study
in a broader cultural setting.
Further reading
Szymanski, D.M. and Hise, R.T. (2000), ‘‘E-satisfaction: an initial examination’’, Journal of
Retailing, Vol. 76 No. 3, pp. 309-22.
Zeithaml, V.A. and Bitner, M.J. (1996), Services Marketing, McGraw Hill, New York, NY.
APJML Appendix. Measurement scales
22,3 1. Perceived service quality dimensions
a. Ease of use (EOU)
EOU1 It is easy to get access to the online organization’s website in
which I obtained online services
EOU2 The site is user friendly
370 EOU3 Navigation on the site is easy
EOU4 It is easy to find my way on the site
b. Website design (WEB)
WEB1 The information on the site is attractively displayed
WEB2 The information on the site is well organized
WEB3 The information on the site is easy to understand and follow
WEB4 The site layout and colors are appealing (fascinating)
c. Responsiveness (RESP)
RESP1 It is easy to get in contact with the online organization, which
provides the online services
RESP2 The online organization is interested in getting feedback
RESP3 The online organization is prompt in replying to queries
RESP4 The online organization is prompt in replying to requests
d. Customization (CUST)
CUST1 I feel my personal needs have been met when using the site or doing transactions
with the online organization
CUST2 I feel the online organization has the same norms and values as I have
CUST3 This site provides me with information and products according to my preferences
CUST4 This site provides me with information on how to do the products modification
according to my preferences
e. Assurance (ASSURE)
ASSURE1 I feel secure about the electronic payment system of the online
organization
ASSURE2 I feel secure when providing private information to the online
organization
ASSURE3 I would find the online systems secure in conducting the
online transactions
ASSURE4 The online organization is trustworthy
2. Satisfaction (SAT)
SAT1 I am generally pleased with the organization’s online services
SAT2 I am very satisfied with the organization’s online services
SAT3 I am happy with the online organization
SAT4 The website of the online organization is enjoyable
3. Trust (TRUST)
TRUST1 I am prepared to give private information to online organizations
TRUST2 I am willing to give my credit card number to most online organizations
TRUST3 It is not a problem to pay in advance for purchased products over the
internet
TRUST4 Online organizations are professionals
TRUST5 Online organizations always fulfill their promises
4. Loyalty
WOM
LOY1 I will recommend the online organization to other people
LOY2 I would recommend the organization’s website to others Perceived
Intention (INTENT) service quality
LOY3 I intend to continue using the online organization
LOY4 I prefer the online organization above others
dimensions
Source: Adapted from Ribbink et al. (2004)