Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hypoxemia Vs Sleep Fragmentation As Cause of Exces
Hypoxemia Vs Sleep Fragmentation As Cause of Exces
To determine the effects of intermittent hypoxemia on hypoxemic and oonhypoxemic conditions. In summary, two
daytime sleepiness in the clinical setting of obstructive nights of iDtermittent noctumaI hypoxemia during NCPAP
sleep apnea syndrome, we enrolled seven patients in a treatment for OSAS did not diminish the objective improve-
prospective, randomized, crossover study. We had two ment in daytime somnolence seen with NCPAP treatment
experimental conditions with NCPAP treatment as follow: in the absence of noctumaI hypoxemia. Results lend further
(1) to correct apneas, sleep fragmentation, and hyoxemia; support to the hypothesis relating excessive daytime sleep-
and (2) to correct apneas and sleep fragmentation and at iness to sleep fragmentation. (Chat 1991; lOO:l54J-48)
the same time, induce intermittent hypoxemia. The out-
come variable, daytime sleepiness, was measured objec- AlII = apnea-hypopnea index; BMI = body mass indeX; EDS =
tively with the multiple sleep latency test following comple- =
excesdve daytime sleepiness; EOG electrooculogram;
tion of baseline and each treatment condition. Compared MCST=mean continuous sleep time; MSLT=multip)e sleep
with sleep latencies in the untreated condition, both exper- =
latency test; NCPAP nasal continuous positive airway J)res-
sure; OSA = obstructive sleep apnea; OSAS = obstructive sleep
imental treatment arms prolonged sleep latencies (p<O.05). apnea syndrome; PLM = periodic leg movements; PSG = polY-
We found DO statistically significant differences between =
sonmogram; BAI respiratory arousal index; SE sleep edi-=
ciency; TST = total sleep time
mean MSLT scores obtained after NCPAP treatment under
Table 3-Sleep Stage MetJBUrementB and MSLT at Baeline and Each Erperimental Condition·
Post-hoc p Values
Baseline Condition 1 Condition 2
Variable Study CPAP CPAP+N2 BvsCI BvsC2 Cl vs C2
Post-hoc p Values
Baseline Condition 1 Condition 2
Shldy CPAI' CpAp+N2 B vsCI B vs C2 Cl vs C2
No. desat 458 (257) 7 (9) 205 (184) 0.0002 0.01 0.03
Av duration of desat <90%. s 22 (4) 19 (25) 35 (12) ns ns ns
No. desat <90% 395 (281) 4 (8) 190 (179) 0.0009 0.03 0.05
TIme <90%. min 163 (167) 38 (95) 175 (139) 0.003 ns 0.001
TIme <85%. min 119 (171) 0.4 (1) 119 (143) 0.04 ns 0.04
*Results of second night study expressed as mean with SD in parentheses.
Table 5-Respiratory Measures During Sleep at Baseline and Each Experimental Condition·
Post-hoc p Values
Baseline Condition 1 Condition 2
Study CPAI' CpAp+N2 BvsCI B vs C2 Cl vs C2
No. apnealhypopnea events 427 (202) 18 (36) 127 (133) 0.ססOO 0.0004 ns
Apnealhypopnea. h 73 (26) 3.2 (7) 21 (20) 0.ססOO 0.0001 os
No. respir arousals 220 (105) 1.7 (2) 47 (50) 0.ססOO 0.0001 liS
Respir arousal. h 37 (13) 0.2 (.3) 8 (8) 0.ססOO 0.ססOO liS
Total No. arousals. h 50 (13) 7.3 (5) 14 (5) 0.ססOO 0.ססOO os
MCST. min 1.3 (.3) 12.3 (8.3) 4.22 (1.5) 0.0007 ns 0.006
onstrated by the lack of statistically significant differ- abnormal sleep architecture with sleep fragmentation
ences between baseline and experimental condition 2 and nocturnal hypoxemia. Two nights of treatment
in regard to the number of minutes spent below Sa02 with NCPAP greatly improved the sleep architecture
of90 percent and 85 percent, and in the mean duration and mean MSLT scores. When nitrogen was admin-
of each desaturation. istered, the severity of hypoxemia was similar to that
Measures of respiratory disturbances during sleep which existed during baseline studies.
are shown in Table 5. Patients had a baseline apnea- Results of MSLTs are represented in Figure 1. Bar
hypopnea index of 73 and a respiratory arousal index graphs are in order of randomization. The order of
of 37. Except for the mean continuous sleep time study after baseline PSG proceeded from experimen-
under condition 2, all measured variables improved tal condition 1 to condition 2 for patients 1 and 4, and
significantly after NCPAP application. When nitrogen from condition 2 to condition 1 for all others. The
gas was added to NCPAp, the severity of respiratory results of post-hoc Student's (-tests (Table 3) demon-
disturbance increased somewhat compared with strate significant differences in mean MSLT scores be-
NCPAP alone, but the differences were not statistically tween baseline and NCPAP alone (p = 0.045) and be-
significant except for the MCST. tween baseline and NCPAP with nitrogen (p=0.OO8).
The combined results entered in Tables 4 and 5 Mean MSLT scores were similar, however, for exper-
show that before NCPAP treatment, patients had imental conditions 1 and 2, and the differences be-
14 tween them were not statistically significant.
o Baseflne
12 • Condition 1 (NCPAP alone) DISCUSSION
!:l Condition 2 (NCPAP and N2)
10
The mechanism underlying EDS in patients with
sleep apnea is unclear. The following two hypotheses
~
:i 8
have been offered to explain daytime sleepiness: (1)
sleep fragmentation; and (2) hypoxemia. Because sleep
.S
~ 6 fragmentation and hypoxemia are correlated, both
C/)
~
seem to contribute to daytime sleepiness in patients
4
with obstructive sleep apnea. 17 • 19 We studied the
effects of intermittent nocturnal hypoxemia on phys-
2
iologic sleepiness. To our knowledge, this is the first
o study designed to produce hypoxemia, concurrently
2 3 4 5 6 7 correct sleep apnea and sleep fragmentation with
Patients NCPAp' and measure the response variable objec-
FIGURE 1. Results of MSLTs. tively. The main finding of our study is that intermit-
all-night PSGs with MSLTs on the following day for 5 Lamphere J, Roehrs 'I: Wittig R, Zorick F, Conway WA, Roth L
Recovery ofalertness after CPAP in apnea. Chest 1989; 96:1364-
baseline and each oftwo experimental conditions. This 67
length of time undoubtedly is suboptimal in terms of 6 Rajagopal KR, Bennett LL, Dillard TA, Tellis CJ, Tenholder
the NCPAP treatment effect on sleepiness. However, MF. Overnight nasal CPAP improves hypersomnolence in sleep
prolonged hospitalization was impractical, and treat- apnea. Chest 1986; 90:172-76
ment at home would have required a fail-safe device 7 Wittig RM, Conway WA, Zorick F, Sicklesteel J, Roehrs T, Roth
T. CPAP: reduction in daytime sleepiness after one night's use
for intermittent induction of hypoxemia during sleep. (Abstract). Sleep Res 1987; 16:459
To our knowledge, no such FDA-approved device 8 Roth T, Hartse KM, Zorick F, Conway W Multiple naps and
exists. Since the beginnings of NCPAP treatment in the evaluation of daytime sleepiness in patients with upper
clinical medicine, physicians have noticed that one airway sleep apnea. Sleep 1980; 3:425-39
night of treatment reverses OSA and its attendant 9 Stepanski E, Lamphere J, Badia ~ Zorick F, Roth 1: Sleep
fragmentation and daytime sleepiness. Sleep 1984; 7:18-26
sleepiness. IS This impression has been confirmed by 10 Roehrs T, Zorick F, Wittig R, Conway ~ 80th T. Predictors of
recent studies,«~·7 Furthermore, a paper published objective level of daytime sleepiness in patients with sleep-
during our investigation found that MSLT scores related breathing disorders. Chest 1989; 95:1202-06
1141