Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2022 Rivian R1S Watch This 911 Go 2023 Mercedes- Renault 5 Diamant 25 Bestselling
1 Has Appeal and 2 Goth for a Night 3 AMG EQE53: 4 Electrifies a 5 Cars and Trucks of
Lots of Promise on the Town Speed vs. French Icon 2022 (So Far)
Excitement
! BY S C O T T O L D H A M DEC 5, 2019
TOYOTA C-HR
SELF-CHARGING HYBRID
VIEW PHOTOS
He's owned this particular one for about 12 years after buying it from
the original owner in Pittsburg, Missouri, with 9000 miles on its KONA Electric.
odometer. Now it lives in his Southern California garage, parked next
to a Lexus LFA and his daily driver, a Tesla Model 3. The Supra now
shows 12,800 miles on its odometer and is perfect in every way, from
its unmarked 17-inch 8ve-spoke wheels to the gloss of its original
paint 8nish. It's showroom-ready top to bottom and wears a set of
Falken ZIEX all-season tires that were mounted about 8ve years ago.
"I think it's one of 431 Turbos Toyota built in 1994 with the optional
targa roof," he said while opening the door. "We can remove the roof
panel, but it's a pain. You have to crank out 8ve bolts with the factory
supplied ratchet in the glove compartment."
VIEW PHOTOS
Like its predecessor, the 2020 Supra (code named A90), is rear-wheel
drive and powered by a turbocharged 3.0-liter inline-six. Developed
in partnership with BMW, it's essentially a mechanical twin to the
latest Z4 roadster and features the German company's B58
aluminum-block engine, which sports a single turbocharger and direct
fuel injection. It's rated at 335 horsepower at 6500 rpm and 365 lb-ft
of torque at just 1600 rpm, but, as we've learned, it is considerably
more powerful than Toyota claims. Unlike the A80, however, which
was available with a standard six-speed manual or an optional four-
speed automatic, the new Supra is only available with two pedals and
a snappy ZF-sourced eight-speed automatic transmission with a
manual shifting mode and paddle shifters.
VIEW PHOTOS
When it was fresh, we consistently chose the Supra Turbo over its
Japanese rivals in a string of comparison tests, calling it a "world
beater" and a "sensible-shoes supercar". We praised its re8nement,
comfort, and everyday usability and the fact it also delivered more
speed than its rivals. The Crst Supra Turbo we tested back in 1993
hit 60 mph in 4.6 seconds and covered the quarter-mile in 13.1
seconds at 109 mph. Another we tested a year later, however, was
considerably slower, reaching 60 mph in 5.2 seconds and 8nishing the
quarter in 13.8 seconds at 106 mph. Both cars generated an
impressive 0.95 g of lateral acceleration on the skidpad and stopped
from 70 mph in 160 feet.
VIEW PHOTOS
Lighter and more powerful, it's no surprise that the new Supra betters
those test results. Using its launch-control system and aided by the
massive grip of its BMW-spec 19-inch Michelin Pilot Super Sport
summer tires, today's Supra hits 60 mph in 3.7 seconds and thunders
through the quarter-mile in 12.2 seconds at 113 mph. By 130 mph the
new car is 2.6 seconds ahead of its ancestor, and at 150 mph it has
stretched that gap to 3.1 seconds. It also generates 1.07 g of stick and
stops from 70 mph in just 148 ft.
Looking Back
In 1993 we called out the Supra for plagiarizing more than few
styling cues from Ferrari's legendary F40, including its trapezoidal
headlamp lenses, its grille shape, and its big brake-duct scoops. Also,
of course, its signature oversized rear spoiler, which we said "appears
to have been unfastened from something manufactured by
Aerospatiale but is, praise the Pharaohs, only an option." It is
functional, however, with Toyota claiming it produces 66 pounds of
downforce at 90 mph. We've been just as critical of the new Supra's
looks, which we've described as "it-came-from-beneath-the-sea
styling." But there isn't much resemblance between the two, aside
from a bit in their voluptuous rear haunches and the upsweep of their
deck lids.
VIEW PHOTOS
The Mark IV Supra's interior was much more spacious than the cabins
of the Mazda RX-7 and Nissan 300ZX, and it's a wedding ballroom
compared to the snug con8nes of the new car. Its outward visibility
also is far superior, thanks to a low cowl, slim A-pillars, and a larger
greenhouse, but the classic doesn't feel supersized once underway. On
the road it drives smaller and lighter than it is, and it's fast. Not this-
thing-is-trying-to-kill-me fast, but it is quick, and its inline-six pulls
hard up to its 7250-rpm rev limiter. The BMW engine in the new
Supra is limited to 7000 rpm.
VIEW PHOTOS
On the Street
Toyota's storied 2JZ engine lives up to its hype. It's silky smooth and
extremely re8ned, but rather quiet. It's no wonder so many of these
cars wear aftermarket exhaust systems. Run it hard through the gears,
and there's more turbo whistle than exhaust note. In contrast, the
new Supra is much more vocal, especially in its Sport driving mode,
with its boosted six popping and banging during gear changes and on
overruns.
We didn't complain about turbo lag when the Mark IV Supra was new,
and it still isn't worth griping about. The new car's BMW engine hits
harder and at a lower rpm, but the 2JZ's turbos work sequentially,
with the 8rst beginning to build boost at just over 2000 rpm. It comes
on strong around 2500 rpm, giving you a solid push until its second
turbo joins the party at 4000 rpm. "At 4500 rpm, the big mother
clobbers your body like a bungee jump gone wrong," we said of the
engine's second power surge back in 1994. Today, it doesn't feel quite
that impressive, but the 2JZ is undeniably strong, and its upper-rpm
pull lasts for nearly 3000 rpm.
VIEW PHOTOS
The 1994 Supra's clutch pedal and shifter are heavy by today's
standards, and its clutch pickup is a bit abrupt, but the pedal
placement is nice and tight. The brake pedal also is soft at 8rst but
8rms up once the pressure builds. Its hydraulically assisted steering is
a bit dead on center and slower than the new car's sharply responsive
electric unit. But settle into the old Toyota and start driving it with a
heavy hand, and it wants to get it on. Its controls come alive, from the
tight action of its shifter to the satisfying feedback of its steering. Its
transmission ratios make it easy to keep the 2JZ boiling, and its
suspension soaks up the road with Lexus-like compliance. It doesn't
feel mushy, however, even by today's standards, and body roll is kept
in check. It all feels a bit slow to respond after a hard run in the more
immediate and athletic GR Supra, but the Mark IV's dynamics and
overall performance hold up. Its chassis rigidity, however, is a true
sign of its age. Even with its roof panel tightly bolted in place, the
A80's structure is Eaccid compared to the milled-from-billet solidity of
the modern machine.
VIEW PHOTOS
WAT C H N E X T
MORE FROM
COMPARISON TEST
2022 Ford Maverick XLT vs. 2022 2022 BMW X3 vs. Genesis GV70 2022 Maserati MC20 vs. 2021
Honda Civic Sport vs. Lexus RX350 Porsche 911 Turbo S
Civic Si vs. Elantra N vs. Tested: Veloster N vs. BRZ vs. Tested: 2021 Ford Bronco vs. Jeep
Volkswagen Jetta GLI GR86 vs. GTI Wrangler
" # $ %