Form 7.

10 Intellectual Property Rights Evaluation

Resource Title:
Copyright owner
Publisher
Date of publication:
License Agreement
LAttach a copy to this report as appropriate
A. Catafoguing printor digitalresources No
Cataloguirng means.craating.a reaord.oireROurcein a:databásethiat Check allhef Cheakilthait dpplr ( )
will be published onlihe
A 1 ls the existing LRTRIPDM owned by DepED? A2
A 2 Is the existing LRTR/PDM owned by a third party? A3 A3
A3 Is the owner of the LR/TR/PDM able to be identifled? 4 Do not catalogue.
. Complete IPR
Evaluston Report
A 4 Is there a lcense agreement avallable for this LR/TRPDM? A6
A5 Do the terms in the license agreement
A5 Complete IPR.
ellow cataloguing of the resource? A6
Evaluation Report.
A6 The LR/TR/PDM may be Catalogued after successtuly passing all other Prepare IPR Evaluatio Report
required evaluations.

BReproducing rasourdesfororitne S

copies.o esootstibete
B1ls the exdsting LR/TRIPDM owned by DepED? B6 2

B2is the existing LRITRPDM ownedby athird party? B3 B2

B3 Is the owner ofthe LR/TRIPDM able to be ldentified? B4 Do not Reproduce
Complete IPR
Evaluaton Report
B4 Is license agreement avallable for this LRTRPDM?
there a B5 B6
|B5 Do the terms in the license agreement allow reproduction of the resource? B 6 Do not Reproduce.
Complete IPR
Evaluation Report
B6 Are there any quantity restrictdons related to reproducdon? B7. Document B7
inIPR Report
B7 Are there any restrictions on redeeming the cost ofreproduction and B8. Document B8.
distribution?
In IPR Report
B8 The LRTR/PDM may be Reproduced aftersuccessfully passing all other Prepare PR
required evaluations. Evaluaton Report

C.Redevetopment ofresources Didltzetion only Yes No

Adigitalversion.ofanon-digitainesoutoe i oraated andalthe ondinel Ceo al nat apply
Content anddesignS relained
C1 Is the existing LR/TRIPDM owned by DepED? C6
C2 Is the existing LRTRPDM ownedby athird party? C3 C3
C3ls the owner of the tRTRIPDM able to be ldentfied? C4 Do nat Digltze
Complete IPR
Evaluation Report
C4 Is there alcense agreementavallablefor thie LRTRPDM7 C5 C6
C5 Do the terms in the llcense agreement allow digitizatlon ofthe resouroe? C6 Do not Reproduce.
Complete IPR
Evaluation Report
C6 Are there any restictons releted to digitizing the resource? C7. Document C7
inIPR
Evaluation
Report.
.10 Page 1 of 3
 cen C8 Complete IPR
work of thebedocumented
verifiedthatauthor/s.
all design and content ofthe resource lstheorlginal|C8 Evaluation Repont
C8.Originality of thee rasourte can be,varified and acknowledgemenis ol C9 Do not digitize
sources of reference are Complete IPR
identfied.
Evaluation Report
C9 Are there any resticions relating to eccess and C 10. Document C11
online distribution? distribution via secured
in 1PR
Evaluation

C 10 The LRTRIPDM
may be Digitzed ater successtully
Report.PR Evatuation Report.
passng al othr Prepare
requlred evaluations.
C11 The LRTRPDM may be digitized and
uploadfor distribution vta the
LRMDS reposltory successfuly passing all other Prepare IPR Evalueton Report.
requlred evaluetions.
DRedevelopmay toour
Tedesi9, heckal thal-4ppy.( Y
AresoUre s ogaledasing thaa
D1s the exdstng LRTRPDM owhed by DepED? 2
D2 s the axiatng D6
LRTRPDM owned by a third party? D3 D3
D3ls the owner of the LR/TRPDM able to be ldentitled? Do notmodify.
Complete lPR

-D4He there a lcense agreement availabte for this LR/TRPDM? Evaluaton Report
D5 D7
D5 Do the tems in the
license agreement allow modficstton of the resource? |D8 Do not modity.
Complete IPR

D8ls all the eopyright vested n DepED? Evaluation Report.

D7 ls copyright of alt material vested in
D7
one party? D8 dentity in the 1PR
Evaluation report
required pemissions to
be clearad.
D8 ls DepED authorizedtomodify the copymghted LR/TRPDMfor purposes
of instruction and or training?
D9 ldentily in the IPR
Evaluation report
required pemissions to
be cleared.
D9ls DepED authorized to create derivatives of the copyrighted LRTRPDM ldentfy in the IPR
for purposes of Instruction and or training? Evaluaton report
required permissions to
becleared.
D 10 The LRTR/PDM may bemodifed and redesigned after successfully Prepare IPR Evaluatdon Report
passing al other requred evaluations The minimum set of rights metadata for
modfying the LRITRIPDM is documented In the
PR Eveluaton.
Copyrigkt owner, Entity partes, License
agreemens
Address and contact details of copyright owner
Conditonsreetrictions for modifcetion and
redevelopment

E. PR Guldelines andchecklistfor newandredeveloped and dightzedLRITRPOMSto beIncluded

in LRMDS repository.
Instructons:
1. The folowing Guldelines and Checkllst refer to new and redeveloped LRs/TRs/POMs that are to be

reproduced, catalogued oruploaded in the LRMDS

2. Secton Eshould be completed by the Dvislon/Regional LRMDS personnal responsible for metadata
YES NO
contant E2 Do not reproduce or
redesign and development work including the
all new
E.1. The calalogue Review
creaton is without intringement/offens e from the origlnal copyright. content for IPR
Pana 2 nf3
7.10
 conformance
2.Has pemisslon been granted from the third party Do not catalogue. Soek
all third party content included In the resource? copyrlght owner forE3
permieslon and
acknowledgement
roqulremente for all
third parly content
F Inctuded In the

E. 3 rosOurce.
Copyright Information, acknowledgemants are documented In the E4
resource E4
E. 4 Copyright Informeton,
metadata
acknowledgements can be documented In the E6 Do not catalogue or
uploed resourco to

LRMD8
E. 5 Compiete Rights metadata The minimum set of ights metadata for thee
LRTR/PDM Is documented in the Rights Elements
ofthe Metadata.
Copyright owner, Ently partes, Lkcange
agreements
Address and contact detalls of copyright owner
Conditions/restrictionss for modificaton and

redevelopment.
F. Maintenance of LRTR/PDMs catalogued and Included in LRMDS
Section F is completed annually by the LRMDS Reglon QA Team
Yes No
F.1 Annual review and incorporation of new and existing legal requirements for IP rights
Completed ldenty LRs
Record of all
LRITRIPDM requiring IP
IPR update fled rights
with LRMDs updates
Manager.
G. Publication of LRTRIPDMs catalogued and Included In LRMDS
Section G is completed by the LRMDS Administration and Publication personnel prior to the publication of
the LRTR/PDM.
Yes No
G.1 The minimum set of rights metadata for digitizing LRs/TRs/PDMs Is documented
Copyright oWner, entty parties
Lícense agreement detes
Addresa and contact detalls of
copyright owner Condittons of usse

Included in metadata.
Evaluatlon completed by:
Date:

Contact details:
 arm.7.2 Educational Soundness Evaluation
ctions for using thls Checkllet:
3)nepurpose of the evaluation checklist is to determine whether or nat a LR/TR/PDM achlaved a genera
of Educational.soundness.
avel

0
0necklist is used by the
review a resource. subject matter or curlculum speclallst or Instructonel Deslgner to desig
rces NoT meetng the mandatory (") quattiles shouldnot þe ftuther evaliated. The reviewer should
T ne checkist and provide a descripilon of thelesues ln the Comments Secton.
he completed Checklist is subrmitted to the QA Coordlnator.
Any resouroethetpessesthis
See Sectlions 7.5-7.8.
intal exteneive Educational Qualily review.
reviewwl be subjgctedto,amore
source Prolect Name/Code: Ttle
Resource
cation of Resource
age of.Development of Resource:
AReview:
arrode .
irrentFormat:
Pyright:

älties ofthetaatnmagk a0o

ofésslonál Deveiopment Materal
andetory ()
Integrity
Content is accurate and reflects tha ways in which
knowledge is conceptualzed within the domain. frtegrity
Supports leamers' deepentng of knowledge wthin the
content domain. Integrity
Presents controverslal issues with balance and fairness
and in accordance with the DepED curriculum policies,
where these apply. and. integrity
Uses tanguage and.symbols of the content domaln
its ways of representation, and supports lesmers In
developing and using them. integrity
The falowing are used.correctly and 'appropriately:,
tenms and axpresslons
symbols and notations
diagremmatic representation
graphicai representation Integrity
with identifying and differentlating
Assists the learner
between different points of vlew and perspectlves
presented Leamer
'.i Uses content in ways that are raal to life/authenticfor Focus
learners/users trivialized
over simplified or
are not withlin thelr Imaginery or
makes s e n s e to leamers
real word
are realistic within the relevant context
enhances learners' social capitel-thelr
knowledge
qf howthe world works and how to makefor the
a way In it Leamer
the target fearner/user
Reflects the profile of Focus
Currlculum ortraining area. Leamer
to. learners/users in"
Presents the same idea Focus
multiple/multi-dlrectional modes
visual text (e,g. pictures, diagrams).
vetbal (written) text
symbolic representatons
oral (spoken) text:

both static end dynamic imag88 Learnar

oblectlves are made expllclt to leamere/users.
Learning Focus
i
Leamer
are clearly ldentifled
The target leamers/users Page 1 of2
 Focus

(academic leveltechnicalablity/demographlcs Leamer

addressed
12. Content is structured to scaffold learning9 Focus
Learmer

13. Provldes an opportunity for loamersAusers to obtain Focus

feadback eltherwithin or outalde theresource. Learner

14. thelr
Pre-requlsite knowledge/sklls era cleartyldentfed and
connectlons to prior and future leaming are
Focus

8stablehed. Usability
15.Is easytouse (tme and etfortto use t ls reasonable)and
the language is appropriate for the Intended leamer/user. Usability
16. Clear linstructlons for use are provided (e., purpose,
processes,Intended outcomes are explicli). (l.e., the user
17. Leaming and infomatlon design ls inultve
Usability

knows what to do and how to do It). Accessibifit

18 The leaming resource can be accessed by leamersusers
in deprived; depressed and underserved areas and

communites Accessibilit
19. The resource may not requlre teacher/facilitator
Intervention to be used effectlvely In varled leaming
environments and laaming sequences
(.e. It may include instrtfctlons, terms, máterlal in
English/Fllpinoñocal dlalect as maybe neocessary). Accessibilit
20. Thelearning resource connects to learners
personailocal knowtedge and experlence lingulstic
and.cultural exparience
local (communlty/geogaphic) condidans
indvidual and famly circumstances- Inclyding, gender,
ablitfes, econgmic conditons
addressas
Interest and degree of ongagement-Oh partlouler
differently abled.jeamers) Accessibilit
In any
21. Resource does not canfront or embarrass leamers
or all of the, following ways:
whlch
requlre leamer to expose persongl data may
embarass them
Invade leamera' prlvacy
with
unfavourably compere leamers' leaming perlarmanca
leemers kdentty.
unfavourably or storectyplcaly compare famlyor

communtty cheracteristies with learners' ldentty

beliets or
unnecessartly or Indlecrminately confront cutural
practces is avallable Accessibilit
22. Equvalent or altemative access to informatlon
y
for leamers' with dverse needs
ldentical oontent or actiity ls presented in ditferent
modatles
dhfferant activitles that achleve the same leaming outcome
are avalleble
Result of Evaluatlon of the
Resource

Comments:

Evaluatlon completed by:

Date:
Contact detalis:
 o Form 7.6 Evaluation for the Development of New Print Resource
r y e codename: Cilent
Title
Subject area(s):
Grade Year
level
Date of
Publication:
Publication forma/s. (Check all that apply ( ) Othe
PowerPoin HTML Excel Rich
Word PDF
document Taxt r

Fomat (specity
RTE

Packaging regquirementsfor offline distribution

Requirements (Check al that apply (N) or write in requirements
Color Black and white
Quality:
LPapersize and quaiity: Size: A4, A3, etc.
Loose-leaf sheets Booklet/s Card board folder
Packaging and Binding Ring binder Bound
requirements:

Prnt guantity: No. of pages per package I No.of packages or sets ofmaterials
Other:

Quality Review criterion consider the extent to

which the resource
Examine the material carefulty and for each evauation Satisfactory (S)}; 2 Poor
Instructlons: number [with 4 belng Very Satisfactory (VS);
3
the criterion. If a
meets the criteria. Check Forappropriate
a rating below 4, write your
comments/justificattons on each evaluation

and 1 Not Satisfactory. rated 3 on said criterion. extra sheets. if necessary.

Attach
criterion is Not Applicable (NA), the material is
evaluation completing in hardcopy
our report may be completed in soft or hardcopy. Please write legibly if
s/NA Poor Not
Factor 1: Content 3 2. Satlefactory
1

Content is suitable to the student's level of development

Material contributes to the
achievement of specific objectives of the subject
2.
area and grade/yearfor levelfor whlch It ls Intended skills such as
provides the development of higher cognitive
3 Material problem soving, etc.
critical thinking, creatlivity, leamíng by doing, Inqulry, biases
is free of cutural, relglous, raclal, and gender
ideological,
4.Material
and prejudlces desirable values and ralts 8uch as:
5.Meterial enhances the development of
(Put a check mark onlytothe aapplicable values
and traits)_
Pride in being Fillpino 5.8 Honesty and trustworthiness
5.1 5.9 Ablity to know ight from wrong
5.2 Sclentific atitude and reasoning
5.10 Respect
5.3 Desire for excellence Criical and creative thinkng
5.4 Love for country
5.11
5.12 Productive work
5.5 Helpfulness/Teamwork/Cooperation
5.13 Other: (Please spechy)
5.6 Unity
5.7 Desire to leam new things

6. Material has the potential to arouse Interest of target reader acdvittes

notes are provided in toplca and
7. Adequate warning/cautionaryconcern
where safety and health are of
Total Points Passed
polnts out of maximum 28 points
Resource must score at least 21
a
Note: put check mark on the appropriate box
this criterion, Please a
Falled
to pass

Page 1 of3
 VS s/NA Poor
Factar 2: Format 3 2
Satist

i.Prints
letters is appropriate to the intended user
1.1 Size of
12Spaces betwoen leters and words faclitate reading
i,3 Foatis easy to read
iPinung Is of good qualty (i.8., no broken letters, even density, correct allgnment,
perly placed screenregistration)
2. *stans
2.1 Simpla and easily recognzable
2 laify and supplement the text
Property labelled or captioned (f applcable)
2.4 Reolstc/ appropriate colors
25Atractve and appeallng
2.3 Cuturaly relevant
&Design and Layout
3.1Attractive and pleasing to look at
3.2 Simple (Le., does not distract the attentlon of the reader
33Adeguate lilustraton In reBadon to text
3.4 Hamcnlous blending of elements (e.g, ustratdons and tex)
4. PpoF and Bindling
4.1 Papur used conuributes to easy reading
4.2 Durable blnding to withstand frequent use
5. Slze and Welght of Resource
i 5.1 Easy to handle
5.2 Relatively ight
Total Foints
Nsote: Resource must score at least 54 points out of a maxmum 72 polnts to Passed
pass this citerlon. Please put a check mark on the appropriate box
Falled

Factor 3: Presentaton and Orgazation S/NA Poor 2 Not

3 Satísfaciory

. Presentation isengaging, interesting, and understendable

2.There is logical and smooth law of ideas
3.ocabulary levelisadapted totargetreader'slikelyexperenceandlevelof
understanding_
4. Length of sentences s sulted to the comprehension level of the target reader
5.Sentences and paragraph structures are aried and interesting to the target|
neader
Total Points
Note: Resource must score at least 15 polnts out of a maximum 20 points to Passed
pass this crterion. Please put a check mark on the appropriate box
Falled

Facior 4: Accuracy and Up-to-datedness of Informatlon Not Present Present & Poor Do
Nute down observatons about the infommation contained in the material, citng present but very requires major not
Specrleeageswherethe foliowing errors arefound minor &
must be
redevelopment evaluate
2 further.
ixed

1.Conceptual erors
2. Factual erors
3. Grammatcal errors
4. Computatlonal erors
5. Obeolete informatton
6. Typographical and other minor etrore (e.g., Inapproprlate or unclear
ilustrations,missinglabels, wrong captions, etc.)_
Tatal Polts
Note: Resource must score 24 out of a maximum 24 points to pass this Passed
criterlon. Please put a check mark on the appropriate box
7.6 Pade ;of 3
 Falled- Alllasucs mustbe documented
in
the comments sectdon.

other Comments
eceesary.)
Please wrte your comments and recommendations on the materisi not captured in FEctors 14. Ueo addidonal sheet f

Recommendationls

Evaluator(s):
Date

Pana 3 nf
76