Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: We present studies of magnetotransport properties of Ge1xyPbxMnyTe bulk crystals with chemical
Received 14 September 2015 composition changing from 0.180 < x < 0.311 to 0.019 < y < 0.136. Our samples show the presence of the
Received in revised form cluster-glass-like transition accompanied with magnetic irreversibility at temperatures TSG around 90 K.
15 October 2015
The presence of strong anomalous Hall effect (AHE) with hysteresis is observed at T < TSG. The data
Accepted 16 October 2015
Available online 20 October 2015
analysis allowed calculation of a correction to the Hall constant RH for T < TSG and the AHE constant, RS. RS
is around 106 m3/C. RS and RH do not change strongly with temperature. The scaling law analysis has
proved that the AHE in this system is due to the extrinsic mechanisms dominated by the skew scattering
Keywords:
Semimagnetic-semiconductors
with relatively small contribution of the side jump process. Strong localization occurs in our system at
Ferromagnetic-materials T < TSG and causes a presence of a minimum in the resistivity vs. temperature dependence. The
Cluster-defects magnetoresistance of our samples shows complex behavior at T < TSG. The negative magnetoresistance is
observed at T < 20 K and interpreted as spin-dependent scattering of conducting carriers on localized
magnetic moments. At higher T nearly linear positive magnetoresistance is observed at temperatures
from 20 K up to T z TSG, where it reaches maximum. Positive linear magnetoresistance is related to the
granular nature of our samples while the maximum near TSG is related to the giant spin-splitting of the
valence band.
© 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.10.141
0925-8388/© 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
266 rni et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 658 (2016) 265e271
A. Podgo
2. Sample characterization
studied by means of temperature dependent and field dependent a linear function of B. The temperature dependence of the Hall
magnetotransport measurements. The magnetoresistance and the constant, RH, calculated from the dependence of ryx on B is plotted
Hall effect were measured simultaneously at selected temperatures in Fig. 4. As we can see the RH does not show significant changes
with the use of the six contact dc current technique. We have used with the temperature at T > TSG and increases with decreasing
the superconducting magnet with the maximum magnetic field temperature at T TSG. The carrier transport in our samples is not
B ¼ 13 T and the sweep speed of about 0.5 T/min, equipped with the thermally activated and thus we do not expect any significant
cryostat allowing the control of the temperature of the sample in temperature dependence of the Hall constant. It is then evident
the range of 1.4 T 300 K. The samples, cut to size of about that the increase of the RH(T) dependence at T TSG is an artifact of
1 1 10 mm, were etched and cleaned before making electrical the data analysis. In order to determine the strength of the AHE and
contacts. The contacts were made with the use of gold wire and to properly estimate the Hall carrier concentration and mobility for
indium solder. The ohmic behavior of each contact pair was T TSG an appropriate fitting procedure must be employed.
checked prior to the measurements. The Hall effect in a material doped with magnetic ions shows
the usual Lorentz term RHB and a second contribution, namely AHE
3.1. Anomalous Hall effect term RSM, caused by the asymmetric carrier scattering. The AHE is
due to the spineorbit coupling in the presence of spin-polarization
The magnetic field dependence of the resistivity component (for details see Ref. [13] and references therein). The AHE term in
perpendicular to the current and magnetic field direction, ryx(B), some cases dominates the total Hall effect below the temperature
was measured at several stabilized temperatures below, near, and of the magnetic transition, thus making the precise estimation of
above the cluster-glass-like transition temperatures TSG (values the carrier concentration and mobility very difficult. The magnetic
gathered in the legend to Fig. 2) in all our samples. Our results field dependence of the Hall resistivity tensor component, ryx,
indicate clearly that, for all Ge1xyPbxMnyTe crystals below TSG, the measured in the standard six contact Hall geometry can be
ryx(B) dependencies show large anomalous Hall effect (Fig. 3b) and expressed using the following relation:
the presence of hysteresis in ryx(B) curves (Fig. 3c). The selected
ryx(B) curves visible in Fig. 3b show that the AHE makes a signifi- ryx ¼ RH B þ m0 RS M; (1)
cant contribution to the total Hall effect in our Ge1xyPbxMnyTe
samples at T < TSG. The analysis of the magnetometric and the Hall where m0 is the magnetic permeability constant. Both the ordinary,
effect hysteresis loops shows that the coercive field, HC, values RH, and anomalous, RS, Hall coefficients can be extracted from the
obtained by using the two types of measurements coincide with a total Hall effect with the knowledge about the magnetic field
good accuracy and point into similar values of TSG. It is a signature dependence of the magnetization, namely M(B) curves at given
that the asymmetric carrier scattering occurs in our cluster-glass- temperatures. The use of the M(B) curve (example in Fig. 3a) is
like system and can be directly linked to the magnetic properties crucial, especially for a system in which the magnetization does not
of the Ge1xyPbxMnyTe alloy. show saturation even at relatively high fields B ¼ 9 T, which is the
The typical analysis of the Hall effect in a nonmagnetic case for our samples. In such a system the AHE term gives a
conductor assumes that the magnetic field dependence of the off- contribution that is not constant as a function of the magnetic field
diagonal resistivity component, ryx(B) ¼ RH$B, i.e. the Hall effect is over the entire measurement range. Therefore, both the ordinary
and the anomalous terms of the Hall effect affect the ryx(B)
dependence at high fields and cause it to be an increasing function
of the applied magnetic field. Thus, a complex fitting procedure coefficient was estimated for each sample and measurement tem-
needs to be employed in order to properly determine the Hall effect perature. The nH values obtained for our samples change from 1.06
parameters i.e. to calculate precisely the RH and RS at low temper- to 1.18. The values of nH indicate that the AHE in our
atures T < TSG. Ge1xyPbxMnyTe samples is mainly due to the extrinsic skew
The proper determination of the strength of the observed AHE scattering process. Since nH > 1 the other scattering mechanisms
and the calculation of the Hall constant and carrier mobility re- giving a small contribution to AHE are also present in our system.
quires employing a fitting procedure of the experimental data to Eq. The scaling analysis of our data indicates that extrinsic skew scat-
(1). We performed
a series of least square fits of the experimental tering is dominant AHE mechanism in our cluster-glass-like
ryx(B,M(B))T¼const dependence to Eq. (1) with the use of the Minuit Ge1xyPbxMnyTe samples. On the other hand, for ferromagnetic
functional minimization package [14]. Fitting procedure was Ge1xMnxTe and Ge1xCrxTe layers the side jump mechanism of
divided into two steps. As a first step both RH and RS were taken as AHE becomes more pronounced [24,25]. The extrinsic scattering
the fitting parameters. For the second series of fits we assumed a mechanism becomes more pronounced in a system with strong
constant value of RH (averaged value calculated using the values magnetic disorder and low electrical resistivity [26]. The strong sp-
obtained during the first series of fits). This is a reasonable result, d exchange interaction and low carrier mean free path can intro-
since our samples do not show thermally activated carrier trans- duce a contribution from side-jump mechanism to the system. The
port. During the second series of fits only the anomalous Hall nH values obtained for our Ge1xyPbxMnyTe samples are generally
constant RS was taken as a fitting parameter. The obtained values of smaller than the ones obtained for Ge1xySnxMnyTe [17] and
RS as a function of temperature for the selected Ge1xyPbxMnyTe Ge1xyMnxEuyTe [16] crystals. The nH values from Refs. [17] and
samples with different chemical compositions (see legend) are [16] change from 1.1 to 1.3. Therefore, it seems that for the Pb-
plotted in Fig. 4. alloyed GeTe crystals the extrinsic skew scattering process is a
The values of RS obtained in this work are of the same order of more pronounced physical mechanism responsible for the AHE
magnitude as the values reported for other IVeVI based diluted than in the tho other representatives of IVeVI semimagnetic
magnetic semiconductors such as Sn1xyMnxEryTe, semiconductors.
Ge1xyMnxEuyTe and Ge1xySnxMnyTe [15,17,16]. We found no
trace of any trend between the Mn content and the value of the RS. 3.2. Resistance and magnetoresistance studies
A small minimum in RS(T) is observed at T z 10 K, the effect most
probably associated with the low temperature magnetic transition The transport studies of our Ge1xyPbxMnyTe samples included
in our samples. Besides that effect there seem to be no significant the measurements of the temperature dependence of the resistivity
changes in RS(T) functions for all our samples. The absence of RS(T) parallel to the current direction, rxx, in the absence of an external
dependence is typical for IVeVI semiconductors [18,16]. The magnetic field. The results of our measurements are presented in
physical mechanisms responsible for the observed AHE in our Fig. 5 and gathered in Table 1. The resistivity values measured at
samples are yet unknown and the proper scaling analysis of the T ¼ 300 K (see Fig. 5b) show a slight increase with the amount of Pb
experimental data must be employed in order to shed light on the in the alloy. It is a consequence of an increasing concentration of
physical origin of the AHE in this material. scattering centers in the alloy. Carrier concentration and mobility
Physical mechanisms responsible for the AHE can be divided do not exhibit such clear trend as a function of the average lead
into intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms. It is a fact known in the content. This means that the increase in resistance as a function of x
literature, that there are two major extrinsic mechanisms leading to is most probably related to the increasing (with x) concentration of
the formation of AHE, namely skew scattering and side jump, which
have been described theoretically and distinguished by appropriate
linear [19] and square [20] dependencies between the diagonal and
off-diagonal resistivity components, using the relation RS f rnxxH ,
where nH ¼ 1 or 2, respectively. There also exists an intrinsic
mechanism that can be responsible for the AHE. This mechanism is
related to the topological effect occurring in the semiconductor.
This intrinsic AHE mechanism was described theoretically based on
the Berry phase theory and was used to describe the AHE in
Ga1xMnxAs with a metallic type of conductivity [21]. The topo-
logical explanation of the AHE was also employed theoretically for
IVeVI semiconductors [22,23]. The Berry phase theory predicts the
square scaling dependence RS f r2xx .
The scaling analysis of the AHE in our samples was based on the
fitting of the experimental data using the following equation
Fig. 6. The magnetic field dependencies of the magnetoresistance obtained at selected stabilized temperatures (see labels) for the studied Ge1xyPbxMnyTe samples with different
chemical compositions.
[3] W. Dobrowolski, J. Kossut, T. Story, Handbook of Magnetic Materials, Elsevier, E.I. Slynko, J. Appl. Phys. 113 (2013) 063702.
Amsterdam, 2003, p. 289377. Chaps. IIVI. [18] B. Brodowska, I. Kuryliszyn-Kudelska, M. Arciszewska, K. Dybko,
[4] M. Wang, R.P. Campion, A.W. Rushforth, K.W. Edmonds, C.T. Foxon, V. Domukhovski, W. Dobrowolski, V.E. Slynko, E.I. Slynko, V.K. Dugaev, Mater.
B.L. Gallagher, Appl. Phys. Lett. 93 (2008) 132103. Pol. 26 (2008) 927.
[5] R.T. Lechner, G. Springholz, M. Hassan, H. Groiss, R. Kirchschlager, J. Stangl, [19] J. Smit, Phys. Amst. 12 (1955) 877.
N. Hrauda, G. Bauer, Appl. Phys. Lett. 97 (2010) 023101. [20] L. Berger, Phys. Rev. B 2 (1970) 4559.
[6] M. Hassan, G. Springholz, R.T. Lechner, H. Groiss, R. Kirchschlager, G. Bauer, [21] T. Jungwirth, Q. Niu, A.H. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 207208.
J. Cryst. Growth 323 (2011) 363. [22] A. Dyrdal, V.K. Dugaev, J. Barnas, Phys. Rev. B 78 (2008) 245208.
[7] W. Knoff, V. Domukhovski, K. Dybko, P. Dziawa, R. Jakieła, E. Łusakowska, [23] A. Dyrdał, V.K. Dugaev, J. Barnas, B. Brodowska, W. Dobrowolski, Acta Phys.
̧tek, B. Taliashvili, T. Story, K. Szałowski, T. Balcerzak, Acta
A. Reszka, K. Swia Pol. A 115 (2009) 287.
Phys. Pol. A 116 (2009) 904. [24] Y. Fukuma, M. Arifuku, H. Asada, T. Koyanagi, J. Appl. Phys. 91 (2002) 7502.
[8] Y. Fukuma, H. Asada, S. Miyawaki, T. Koyanagi, S. Senba, K. Goto, H. Sato, Appl. [25] Y. Fukuma, H. Asada, T. Taya, T. Irisa, T. Koyanagi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89 (2006)
Phys. Lett. 93 (2008) 252502. 152506.
[9] J.S. Lee, A. Richardella, D.W. Rench, R.D. Fraleigh, T.C. Flanagan, J.A. Borchers, [26] N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A.H. MacDonald, N.P. Ong, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82
J. Tao, N. Samarth, Phys. Rev. B 89 (2014) 174425. (2010) 1539.
[10] A. Podgo rni, L. Kilanski, W. Dobrowolski, M. Go rska, V. Domukhovski, [27] A.L. Efros, B.I. Shklovskii, J. Phys. C. Solid State Phys. 8 (1975) L49.
B. Brodowska, A. Reszka, B.J. Kowalski, V.E. Slynko, E.I. Slynko, Acta Phys. Pol. A [28] N.V. Agrinskaya, V.I. Kozub, D.V. Shamshur, JETP 80 (6) (1995) 1142.
126 (2014) 1180. [29] N.F. Mott, Metal-insulator Transitions, second ed., Taylor and Francis, London,
[11] A. Podgo rni, L. Kilanski, K. Szałowski, M. Go rska, R. Szymczak, A. Reszka, 1990.
V. Domukhovski, B.J. Kowalski, B. Brodowska, W. Dobrowolski, V.E. Slynko, [30] N.E. Zein, V.I. Zinenko, A.S. Fedorov, Phys. Lett. A 164 (1992) 115.
E.I. Slynko, Magnetic properties of Ge1xyPbxMnyTe Cluster-Glass System, [31] J.E. Lewis, Phys. Stat. Sol. B 59 (1973) 367.
J. Alloys Comp. 649 (2015) 142. [32] Y. Shapira, D.H. Ridgley, K. Dwight, A. Wold, K.P. Martin, J.S. Brooks, J. Appl.
[12] K.T. Aust, B. Chalmers, Can. J. Phys. 36 (1958) 977. Phys. 57 (1994) 3210.
[13] J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, J. Cerne, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 18 (2004) 1083. [33] W.Q. Chen, K.L. Teo, S.T. Lim, M.B.A. Jalil, T. Liew, T.C. Chong, Appl. Phys. Lett.
[14] F. James, M. Roos, Comput. Phys. Commun. 10 (1975) 343. 90 (2007) 142514.
[15] B. Brodowska, W. Dobrowolski, M. Arciszewska, E.I. Slynko, V.K. Dugaev, [34] P.W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. 109 (1958) 1492.
J. Alloys Comp. 423 (2006) 205. [35] Y. Toyozawa, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 17 (1962) 986.
[16] L. Kilanski, M. Go rska, R. Szymczak, W. Dobrowolski, A. Podgo rni, A. Avdonin, [36] R.P. Khosla, J.R. Fischer, Phys. Rev. B 2 (1970) 4084.
V. Domukhovski, V.E. Slynko, E.I. Slynko, J. Appl. Phys. 116 (2014) 083904. [37] H. Bottger, V.V. Bryksin, Hopping Conduction in Solids, Akademie, Berlin,
[17] L. Kilanski, R. Szymczak, W. Dobrowolski, A. Podgo rni, A. Avdonin, V.E. Slynko, 1985.