a agnostic convention that portrays nature as antagonistic and strengths of passing as wild. Dazzle destiny picks arb itrary casualties; man is never accommodated with the world. Beowulf closes a disappointment. There's a few truth in this conclusion, but for the foremost portion, somebody who didn’t have a well-lived life has most likely depicted it. Beowulf is soaks in a agnostic convention, but not one that depicts nature as antagonistic. The setting within the starting is depicted as, “…these wonderful fields stamped off by seas, at that point gladly setting the sun and moon to gleam over the arrive and light it…”(8). This doesn’t sound like anything antagonistic to me; on the opposite, what is being depicted makes an picture of delectation. “The corners of the soil were made exquisite with trees…”(11) is said. When perusing these words, the final thing on my intellect would be unfriendly. Strengths of passing and dazzle destiny picking irregular c asualties may have a few truth to them, but destiny is something