Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Deviation Managementin Pharmaceutical Industry
Deviation Managementin Pharmaceutical Industry
net/publication/343671122
CITATIONS READS
0 18,358
1 author:
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Constituents of the essential oil from Aquilaria agallocha Roxb View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Abm Mahfuz Ul Alam on 15 August 2020.
Deviation:
An unexpected incident that occur during or after the
manufacture, processing, packaging, storage, transport or
testing of pharmaceutical dosage forms.
Minor Deviation:
Failure that would not be expected to result in any loss of
therapeutic effect to the patient or invoke a product complaint.
Major Deviation:
Failure that indicate use of product directly affect the patients, so
that failure could result in adverse reaction, partial loss of
therapeutic effect or would likely result in a product complaint.
Critical Deviation:
Failure that indicate use of product directly have highly affect the
patients which could result in death or injury, adverse reaction,
loss of therapeutic effect or would likely result in a product
recall.
A.B.M. Mahfuz ul Alam, QAM, ACI Limited
What DO You Do When the Deviation Happens?
• Ignore it
• Pretend it never happened
• Don’t worry, it’s a “one in a million”
• Walk away
• Tell your coworker
• Tell your supervisor
• Fix it
• Investigate it
• Investigate and then fix it
• Investigate, document and then fix it
Facility or
equipment problem
No
Yes
Yes No Yes
Product direct Occurred Possible
Problem fully
or indirect before contaminant
corrected? Critical
contact production loss of control
Usual setup
equipment? startup? uniformity?
No Yes No
Minor
Minor Major
Yes
Wrong Grade
or amount of Critical
raw materials?
No
Yes Yes
Spillage or No No
Formulation or Mix in wrong Possible loss
potential loss
order, speed of strength or Critical
bulk mixing of active or
time, temp? uniformity
problem excipients
Yes Yes No
Critical Critical
Major
Critical Critical
No
Yes
No Yes
No
Spillage or No No
Loss of in-process Mix in wrong Possible loss
potential loss
order, speed of strength or Minor
control or interrupt of active or
time, temp? uniformity
to processing excipients
Yes
Yes Yes
Critical Critical
Critical
Yes
Prior history of
defects related
Critical
to the
incident?
No
No
Important in- No Incorrect No In process test
Document, Record process test records for records show
Minor
& Monitoring changed or critical trends toward
Related Incident omitted process step? failure?
Critical
Major Major
Critical
Yes
Lack of No Incorrect
evidence of procedure or
clean/sanitize conditions
Yes Major
contact used for
equipment clean/sanitize
No
No
Equipment or No Visual No Product
Cleaning or product contamination supports the
Minor
sanitization related exceeded max. in equipment growth of
incident hold time on inspection bacteria/mold?
Yes
Yes Yes
Critical Critical
Major
Yes Product
Yes
Contact
Personnel No
Equipment or No Any breach of No error or breach
Sterility Assurance product HVAC or clean
in aseptic Major
exceeded max. room
Related Incident hold time controls?
room (C, B or
A)
Yes
Yes Yes
Critical Critical
Critical
Severity
RA
Type Minor Major Critical
Loss: identity,
strength, purity,
quality
Improbable
(Half 1 2 4
yearly/yearly)
Probability
Remote
Monthly/Quarterly 3 5 7
Frequent
Daily/weekly 6 8 9
– Quality Assurance
• Overall Compliance Responsibility
• Oversee Investigation Activities
• Approval of Investigation Reports/Disposition Decisions
• Instituting Appropriate Actions
• Batch Rejection, etc
Deviation
Investigation
Sample
Wrong preparation
Calculation
procedure error
Transfer of data
Dilution error
Testing conditions
(e.g. Temperature)
Cleaning of
equipment Wrong
Wrong programme
equipment file
Equipment
Test
out of SST failed
calibration Equipment
Wrong filling
process (e.g.
speed) Storage and
Storage and transport of filled
transport of capsules
empty capsules
No automated
removal of defect Packaging
Filling equipment
capsules equipment defect
defect
Excipients
Storage and contaminated Solvents
transport of contaminated
components
Personnel
API Hygiene
contaminated Black
Particles
Initial Situation:
• Amber particles were found during packaging in-
process check in several tablets
• Product: xxx 250 mg Tablets
• The foreign material was amber , rubbery, and
approx. 1 mm x 1 mm x 2 mm in size
Dispensing
Granulator
Workshop Part 1:
Personnel
API
Amber Hygiene
contaminated
Particles
Workshop Part 2:
Which specific actions should be taken to
investigate this problem?
• Documents to be seen
• Questions to be asked
• Persons to be involved
• Measures to be taken
• Controls to be performed
• Decisions to be made
A.B.M. Mahfuz ul Alam, QAM, ACI Limited
Case Study 1: xxx TABLETS
Results of Workshop - Immediate actions:
1. This batch “on hold”
2. Initiate analytical identification of particles
3. Initiate visual inspection of the concerned batch (AQL
or 100%)
4. Initiate visual inspection of starting materials
5. Contact suppliers
6. Review batch record (concerned batch)
7. Review log books and cleaning records
8. Review deviation records
9. Notify other units and initiate additional controls
Further Results:
1. QC analysis of amber particles identifies the material
as:
Styrene Butadiene Rubber
(Synthetic non-toxic rubber)
Workshop Part 3:
Further Results:
Workshop Part 4:
1. Can batches at all be released?
2. Which information and/or documentation is required
for batch release?
3. Which steps are to be taken in order to prevent
further occurrence (root cause identified)?
4. Which steps are to be taken in order to prevent
further occurrence (root cause not identified)?
Learning:
THANK YOU