Professional Documents
Culture Documents
' Department of Fish Diseases, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, 13 Biilowsvej, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C ,
Denmark
Department of Pharmacy, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, 13 Biilowsvej. DK-1870 Frederiksberg C , Denmark
Inter-Research/Printed in Germany
118 Dis. aquat. Org.
parasites per host - infected and uninfected) calculated After few hours eels turned sluggish and lay on their
according to Margolis et al. (1982). Only surviving eels side or back on the bottom of the aquaria, until they
were examined. were removed from the medicated water However the
Parasites. A mixed population of Pseudodactylo- mortality during the 4-d observation period was low
gyrus anguillae a n d P. bin] on larger eels (10 to 20 g (Table 1). The other drugs elicited no irnmediate
body weight) tvere maintained in a 250 1 aquarium adverse reactions, but a high mortality (4 of 10) in the
(25°C). This population of parasites has never been oxibendazole group (10 mg 1-') was noted by 4 d post-
treated with drugs a n d a n infection pressure occurs in treatment.
the aquarium. The formerly uninfected eels were
placed in small net cages (Buchmann 1988b) a n d sub- DISCUSSION
merged in the aquarlum for 6 d , whereby all eels
became infected (30 to 140 parasites eel-'). The trials With the exception of luxabendazole, the ben-
were conducted 14 to 20 d post-infection. zimidazoles used in this investigation were the com-
Drugs. The drug concentrations used are listed in mercially available preparations, including their vehi-
Table !. With one exception (luxabendazo!e), where cles. -4s additions may influence to a greater or lesser
pure substance was used with acetone as solvent, the extent, the suspension of drugs In water, it should be
drug preparations tvere the commercially available stressed that the present comparative study is on the
products: albendazoie (Vaibazen vei. suspension commercially available products and their vchic!cs.
19 m g ml-l), fenbendazole (Panacur suspension These can be ranked after decreasing potency on
100 mg ml-l), flubendazole (Flubenol 50 m g g-l), lux- Pseudodactylogyrus spp. It was found that meben-
abendazole (pure substance), mebendazole (Vermox dazole (Vermox) was the most potent drug and our
suspension 50 mg ml-l), oxibendazole (Loditac vet. 50 results confirm work of Szekely & Molnar (1987), Buch-
mg parbendazole (Helmatac vet. 300 mg g-l), mann & Bjerregaard (1989, 1990) and Mellergaard
thiabendazole (Equizole 330 mg g-') a n d tricla- (1989). However luxabendazole (with acetone as sol-
bendazole (Fasinex suspension 100 mg ml-l). vent) and albendazole (Valbazen) also showed efficacy
against infections with Pseudodactylogyrus spp. When
fenbendazole, flubendazole and oxibendazole, in their
RESULTS commercially available formulahons, were used in
water bath treatments with 10 mg 1-' of t h e drug, only a
Anthelmintic efficacy reduction of the infection level was seen. At this con-
centration triclabendazole treatment only elicited a
It was found that exposure to mebendazole (1 mg 1 - l ) slight reduction of the infection, and parbendazole
for 24 h was 10O0/0 effective in parasite eradication. (Helmatac) could only reduce the infection level at a
Luxabendazole was nearly as efficacious: only one concentration as high as 50 mg I-'. Thiabendazole had
parasite was found in 8 eels after treatment with 1 mg no effect even at 100 mg 1-' and elicited acute toxic
1-l. Albendazole and flubendazole had some effect at symptoms in the eels.
this concentration, but parasite eradication was only Because of the unknown influence of the vehicles in
accomplished for albendazole, as for luxabendazole, at the different benzimidazole-products on drug suspen-
10 m g I-'. sion in, water and penetration of drug into the parasite,
A reduction of the infection level, without total para- it is not possible to make clear conclusions about the
siticidal effect, was found with exposure for 24 h with different pure compounds' action in the monogeneans.
10 m g 1-' of the compounds flubendazole, oxiben- However, it is noteworthy that the benzimidazoles with
dazole and fenbendazole. A less convincing reduction the best effect on Pseudodactylogyrus spp, all have
was seen after treatment with triclabendazole (10 mg substitutions with methyl carbamate in the 2-position
1-l) a n d parbendazole (5 mg I-'). The latter drug had a of the molecule. Thiabendazole a n d triclabendazole
better, but still inadequate, effect at a concentration of are both without the carbamate moiety and have no or
50 m g 1-l. Even with a concentration of thiabendazole little effect on the parasites. The substitutions at the 5-
as h ~ g has 100 mg I-' no reduction of the infection level position differ markedly between the 3 most potent
was found (Table 1). benzimidazoles, mebendazole, luxabendazole and
albendazole, and future research should elucidate the
importance, if any, of this part of the molecule on the
Toxicity observations gill parasites. The major target for benzimidazoles'
action seems to be the microtubule system (Behm &
Thiabendazole (both 10 and 100 m g 1-l) elicited Bryant 1985, Vanden Bossche 1985, Roberson 1988).
escape reactions in eels a few seconds after exposure. Triclabendazole, which differs structurally from other
Buchmann & Bjerregaard: Benzimidazole efficacy in eels 119
Table 1 Anguilla anguilla. Level of parasit.ization with Pseudodactjdogyrus spp. after exposure to various benzimidazoles. Only
surv~vingeels were examined. Length and weight of eels presented
Drug Conc. No. Body -length (cm) Body weight (g) After treatment
(mg 1-') eels X (SDI X (SD) Prevalence Abundance
( n * p ) (SD)
Albendazole
(Valbazen)
Fenbendazole
(Panacur)
Flubendazole
(Flubenol)
Luxabendazole
(pure substance)
Mebendazole
(Vermox)
Oxibendazole
(Loditac)
Parbendazole
(Helmatac)
Thiabendazole
(Equizole)
Triclabendazole
(Fasinex)
Control 1
Control 2
benzimidazoles, has been suggested to act on a However, based on the present investigations, para-
number of targets in the liver fluke (Bennett & Kohler sites which are susceptible to mebendazole (Vermox)
1987). The cumulative effect could thus result in the will not b e affected by thiabendazole (Equizole) a n d
killing of the parasite. In addition, mitochondrial elec- triclabendazole (Fasinex). In addition only a lesser
tron transport is also inhibited by thiabendazole effect was found with fenbendazole (Panacur), fluben-
(Kohler & Bachmann 1987), and Sanval et al. (1989) dazole (Flubenol), oxibendazole (Loditac) a n d parben-
found that enzymes of lipid metabolism are affected by dazole (Helmatac). The importance of the vehicles for
thiabendazole and fenbendazole. Future research the anthelmintic effect of these preparations (drug sus-
should elucidate the exact action mechanisms of ben- pension, parasite penetration) should be investigated.
zimidazoles in Pseudodactylogyrus spp. Also it will be relevant to investigate if mebendazole-
Mebendazole has proved to be a safe and useful resistant gill-parasites, if these will evolve, also have
anthelmintic against pseudodactylogyrosis in intensive lost susceptibility to luxabendazole and albendazole.
eel-farming enterprises based on recirculated water Finally it should be accentuated that before luxaben-
(Buchmann & Bjerregaard 1989, 1990), and the drug is dazole and albendazole can be recommended for treat-
now commonly used. However, resistance to anthel- ment of pseudodactylogyrosis in intensive eel-farming
mintics in parasitic helminths is an increasing problem enterprises, controlled investigations on long-term tox-
in livestock (for review see Anderson & Waller 1985), icity a n d the impact on biological a n d physico-chen~i-
and the risk of selection of mebendazole-resistant cal parameters in the farms should b e conducted, as
monogeneans exists if indiscriminate use of this drug our results only were based on short term laboratory
occurs in eel-farms. Side resistance to other ben- experiments.
zimidazoles might then b e expected. If the failing effect
of other commercially available benzimidazoles is Acknowledgements. This investigation was supported by a
recorded by eel-farmers after resistance has evolved, grant from the Danish Agricultural a n d Veterinary Research
side resistance would then b e a tempting explanation. Council.
120 Dis. aquat. Org. 9 117-120, 1990
Responsible Subject Editor: Professor W Korting, Hannover, Manuscript first received: January 11, 1990
Germany Revised version accepted: J u n e 19, 1990