You are on page 1of 11

 


FOPM-[‌DEPT‌‌ 
DOCUMENT‌‌NO.:‌  ‌
CODE]-[DOC‌‌CODE‌] ‌ ‌
ORIGINATOR:‌  ‌ MDFERRANCO‌  ‌
DOCUMENT‌‌TITLE:‌‌   ‌ DEPT‌‌CODE‌  ‌ SSD‌  ‌
DEPT‌‌HEAD‌  ‌ ASPASCUA‌  ‌
JOB‌‌HAZARD‌‌ANALYSIS‌  ‌ REVISION‌‌NO.:‌  ‌ 1‌  ‌
REVIEW‌‌CYCLE‌  ‌ ANNUAL‌‌   ‌
 ‌ PAGE‌‌NO.:‌‌   ‌ 1‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

‌TABLE‌‌OF‌‌CONTENTS‌  ‌

1.‌  ‌ PURPOSE‌  ‌ ………………………………………………………………………..‌  ‌ 2‌  ‌

2.‌  ‌ SCOPE‌  ‌ ………………………………………………………………………..‌  ‌ 2‌  ‌

3.‌  ‌ DEFINITION‌‌OF‌‌TERMS‌  ‌ ………………………………………………………………………..‌  ‌ 2‌  ‌

4.‌  ‌ ROLES‌‌AND‌‌RESPONSIBILITIES‌  ‌ ………………………………………………………………………..‌  ‌ 3‌  ‌

5.‌  ‌ GUIDELINES‌  ‌ ………………………………………………………………………..‌  ‌ 3‌  ‌

6.‌  ‌ PROCEDURAL‌‌CONTENT‌  ‌ ………………………………………………………………………..‌  ‌ 4‌  ‌

7.‌  ‌ DOCUMENTS/FORMS‌  ‌ ………………………………………………………………………..‌  ‌ 10‌  ‌

8.‌  ‌ REFERENCES‌  ‌ ………………………………………………………………………..‌  ‌ 12‌  ‌

 ‌
  ‌
  ‌
  ‌
  ‌
  ‌
  ‌
  ‌
  ‌
  ‌
  ‌
  ‌
  ‌
  ‌
  ‌
  ‌
  ‌
  ‌
  ‌
  ‌
  ‌
  ‌
  ‌

 ‌
 ‌
FOPM-[‌DEPT‌‌ 
DOCUMENT‌‌NO.:‌  ‌
CODE]-[DOC‌‌CODE‌] ‌ ‌
ORIGINATOR:‌  ‌ MDFERRANCO‌  ‌
DOCUMENT‌‌TITLE:‌‌   ‌ DEPT‌‌CODE‌  ‌ [‌DEPT‌] ‌ ‌
DEPT‌‌HEAD‌  ‌ ASPASCUA‌  ‌
JOB‌‌HAZARD‌‌ANALYSIS‌  ‌ REVISION‌‌NO.:‌  ‌ 1‌  ‌
REVIEW‌‌CYCLE‌  ‌ ANNUAL‌‌   ‌
 ‌ PAGE‌‌NO.:‌‌   ‌ 2‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌
 ‌
1. PURPOSE‌  ‌
1.1. A‌  ‌Job‌  ‌Hazard‌  ‌Analysis‌  ‌(JHA)‌  ‌is‌‌
  an‌‌
  analysis‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  hazards‌‌
  and‌‌
  risks‌‌
  associated‌‌
  with‌‌
  work/activities‌‌ 
which‌  ‌focuses‌  ‌on‌  ‌identifying‌  ‌and‌  ‌controlling‌  ‌hazards.‌  ‌Utilizing‌  ‌the‌  ‌JHA‌  ‌will‌  ‌provide‌  ‌a ‌ ‌process‌  ‌of‌‌ 
analyzing‌  ‌the‌  ‌work‌  ‌activities;‌  ‌identifying‌  ‌the‌  ‌tools,‌  ‌materials,‌  ‌and‌  ‌equipment‌  ‌needed‌  ‌to‌  ‌develop‌‌ 
work‌  ‌methods‌  ‌and‌  ‌procedures‌  ‌for‌  ‌accomplishing‌  ‌the‌  ‌task.‌  ‌The‌  ‌process‌‌
  will‌‌
  identify‌‌
  existing‌‌
  and‌‌ 
potential‌‌hazards‌‌and‌‌assess‌‌the‌‌risk‌‌and‌‌identify‌‌methods‌‌to‌‌eliminate‌‌or‌‌mitigate‌‌the‌‌said‌‌risk.‌  ‌
 ‌
2. SCOPE‌  ‌
2.1. The‌‌policy‌‌applies‌‌to‌‌all‌‌FOPM‌‌managed‌‌properties.‌‌JHAs‌‌must‌‌be‌‌performed‌‌on‌‌all‌‌activities‌‌that:‌  ‌
● Have‌‌resulted‌‌in‌‌an‌‌incident/accident‌‌trend‌‌or‌‌death.‌  ‌
● Have‌‌a‌‌potential‌‌for‌‌severe‌‌injury‌‌or‌‌property‌‌damage.‌  ‌
The‌‌JHA‌‌must‌‌be‌‌re-evaluated‌‌when‌‌any‌‌changes‌‌in‌‌job‌‌procedures‌‌or‌‌equipment‌‌occurs.‌  ‌

3. DEFINITION‌‌OF‌‌TERMS‌  ‌
3.1. Controls‌:‌‌This‌‌is‌‌how‌‌to‌‌eliminate‌‌or‌‌minimize‌‌the‌‌hazards.‌‌There‌‌are‌‌three‌‌types‌‌of‌‌controls‌  ‌
● Engineering‌  ‌Controls‌  ‌eliminate‌  ‌or‌  ‌reduce‌  ‌exposure‌  ‌to‌  ‌a ‌ ‌chemical‌‌
  or‌‌
  physical‌‌
  hazard‌‌
  through‌‌ 
the‌‌use‌‌or‌‌substitution‌‌of‌‌engineered‌‌machinery‌‌or‌‌equipment.‌ ‌This‌‌is‌‌the‌‌preferred‌‌control.‌  ‌
● Administrative‌‌
  Controls‌‌
  are‌‌
  changes‌‌
  in‌‌
  work‌‌
  procedures‌‌
  such‌‌
  as‌‌
  written‌‌
  safety‌‌ policies,‌‌ rules,‌‌ 
supervision,‌  ‌schedules,‌  ‌and‌  ‌training‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌goal‌  ‌of‌  ‌reducing‌  ‌the‌  ‌duration,‌  ‌frequency,‌  ‌and‌‌ 
severity‌‌of‌‌exposure‌‌to‌‌hazardous‌‌chemicals‌‌or‌‌situations.‌  ‌
● Personal‌  ‌Protective‌  ‌Equipment‌  ‌(PPE)‌  ‌– ‌‌Personal‌‌
  protective‌‌
  equipment,‌‌
  commonly‌‌
  referred‌‌
  to‌‌ 
as‌  ‌“PPE”,‌  ‌is‌  ‌equipment‌  ‌worn‌  ‌to‌  ‌minimize‌  ‌exposure‌  ‌to‌  ‌hazards‌  ‌that‌  ‌cause‌  ‌serious‌  ‌workplace‌‌ 
injuries‌‌and‌‌illnesses.‌  ‌
3.2. Exposure‌‌‌–‌‌When‌‌an‌‌employee‌‌enters‌‌a‌‌“danger‌‌zone”‌‌by‌‌virtue‌‌of‌‌their‌‌proximity‌‌to‌‌the‌‌hazard.‌  ‌
3.3. Hazard‌‌
  – ‌‌An‌‌
  unsafe‌‌
  condition‌‌
  or‌‌
  practice‌‌
  that‌‌
  could‌‌
  cause‌‌
  injury,‌‌
  illness,‌‌ or‌‌ property‌‌ damage‌‌ and‌‌ 
is‌  ‌preventable.‌  ‌Examples‌  ‌of‌  ‌hazards‌  ‌include:‌  ‌working‌  ‌at‌  ‌heights,‌  ‌slippery‌  ‌surfaces,‌  ‌exposed‌‌ 
moving‌‌
  machinery‌‌
  parts,‌‌ fire,‌‌ explosion,‌‌ noise,‌‌ electricity,‌‌ toxic‌‌ emission,‌‌ corrosive‌‌ chemicals,‌‌ low‌‌ 
oxygen,‌‌repetitive‌‌tasks,‌‌heavy‌‌lifting,‌‌infectious‌‌Bloodborne‌‌pathogens,‌‌assault.‌  ‌
3.4. Job‌  ‌Hazard‌  ‌Analysis‌  ‌– ‌ ‌A ‌ ‌process‌  ‌that‌‌
  focus‌‌
  on‌‌
  job‌‌
  task‌‌
  as‌‌
  a ‌‌way‌‌
  to‌‌
  identify‌‌
  hazards‌‌
  before‌‌
  they‌‌ 
result‌  ‌in‌  ‌injury.‌  ‌It‌  ‌focuses‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌relationship‌  ‌between‌  ‌the‌  ‌worker,‌  ‌the‌  ‌task,‌  ‌the‌  ‌tools‌  ‌and‌‌ 
equipment,‌‌and‌‌the‌‌environment‌‌and‌‌identifies‌‌control‌‌to‌‌reduce‌‌or‌‌eliminate‌‌the‌‌hazard.‌  ‌

 ‌
 ‌
DOCUMENT‌‌NO.:‌  ‌ FOPM-CSHM-GQM07‌  ‌
ORIGINATOR:‌  ‌ MDFERRANCO‌  ‌
DEPT‌‌CODE‌  ‌ SSD‌  ‌
DOCUMENT‌‌TITLE:‌‌   ‌
DEPT‌‌HEAD‌  ‌ ASPASCUA‌  ‌
JOB‌‌HAZARD‌‌ANALYSIS‌  ‌ REVISION‌‌NO.:‌  ‌ 1‌  ‌
REVIEW‌‌CYCLE‌  ‌ ANNUAL‌  ‌
 ‌ PAGE‌‌NO.:‌‌   ‌ 3‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

3.5. Task‌  ‌– ‌ ‌Any‌  ‌activity‌  ‌(mental‌  ‌or‌  ‌physical‌  ‌or‌  ‌both)‌  ‌that‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌assigned‌  ‌to‌  ‌an‌  ‌employee‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌‌
responsibility‌  ‌and‌  ‌carries‌  ‌with‌  ‌it‌  ‌both‌  ‌positive‌  ‌and/or‌  ‌negative‌  ‌consequences‌  ‌based‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌‌ 
performance‌‌of‌‌that‌‌job.‌  ‌
 ‌
4. ROLES‌‌AND‌‌RESPONSIBILITIES‌  ‌
4.1. Safety‌‌and‌‌Security‌‌Department‌  ‌
● Review‌‌all‌‌applicable‌‌JHAs‌‌in‌‌post-incident/accident‌‌situations.‌  ‌

Responsible‌‌for‌‌the‌‌implementation‌‌of‌‌this‌‌procedure.‌  ‌

Responsible‌‌for‌‌investigation‌‌if‌‌a‌‌lapse‌‌in‌‌this‌‌procedure‌‌occurred.‌  ‌
 ‌
4.2. Operations‌  ‌
● Responsible‌  ‌for‌  ‌ensuring‌  ‌that‌  ‌this‌  ‌procedure‌  ‌is‌  ‌adhered‌  ‌to‌  ‌and‌  ‌implemented‌  ‌in‌  ‌their‌‌ 
respective‌‌managed‌‌property.‌  ‌
 ‌
 ‌
5. GUIDELINES‌  ‌
5.1. The‌  ‌JHA‌  ‌is‌  ‌a ‌ ‌systematic‌‌
  method‌‌
  of‌‌
  identifying‌‌
  hazards‌‌
  and‌‌
  control‌‌
  measures‌‌
  to‌‌
  safely‌‌
  perform‌‌
  a ‌‌
specific‌  ‌job‌  ‌or‌  ‌task.‌  ‌The‌  ‌process‌  ‌involves‌  ‌breaking‌  ‌down‌  ‌a ‌ ‌particular‌  ‌job/task‌  ‌into‌  ‌a ‌ ‌series‌  ‌of‌‌ 
simple‌‌steps.‌‌In‌‌each‌‌of‌‌these‌‌steps,‌‌hazards‌‌are‌‌identified‌‌and‌‌documented‌‌using‌‌JHA‌‌Form.‌  ‌
 ‌
6. PROCEDURAL‌‌CONTENT‌  ‌
6.1. Selecting‌‌the‌‌Job/Task‌  ‌
In‌‌
  selecting‌‌ jobs‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ analyzed‌‌ and‌‌ in‌‌ establishing‌‌ the‌‌ order‌‌ of‌‌ analysis,‌‌ the‌‌ following‌‌ factors‌‌ should‌‌ 
be‌‌considered.‌‌They‌‌are‌‌listed‌‌in‌‌order‌‌of‌‌importance.‌  ‌
● Occurrence‌‌
  of‌‌ injuries:‌‌ Jobs‌‌ that‌‌ have‌‌ produced‌‌ an‌‌ incident‌‌ or‌‌ accident‌‌ trend,‌‌ or‌‌ death,‌‌ during‌‌ 
the‌‌past‌‌three‌‌years‌‌shall‌‌be‌‌analyzed.‌  ‌
● Frequency‌‌
  of‌‌
  Accidents:‌‌
  Jobs‌‌
  that‌‌
  repeatedly‌‌
  produce‌‌
  accidents‌‌
  (trends)‌‌
  are‌‌
  candidates‌‌
  for‌‌ a ‌‌
JHA.‌‌
  The‌‌
  greater‌‌
  the‌‌
  number‌‌
  of‌‌
  accidents‌‌
  associated‌‌
  with‌‌
  the‌‌ job,‌‌ the‌‌ greater‌‌ its‌‌ priority‌‌ for‌‌ a ‌‌
JHA.‌  ‌Subsequent‌  ‌injuries‌  ‌indicate‌  ‌that‌  ‌preventive‌  ‌action‌‌
  taken‌‌
  prior‌‌
  to‌‌
  their‌‌
  occurrence‌‌
  was‌‌ 
not‌‌successful.‌  ‌
● Potential‌‌
  Severity:‌‌
  Some‌‌
  jobs‌‌
  may‌‌
  not‌‌
  have‌‌
  a ‌‌history‌‌
  of‌‌
  accidents‌‌ but‌‌ may‌‌ have‌‌ the‌‌ potential‌‌ 
for‌‌
  severe‌‌
  injury‌‌
  or‌‌
  property‌‌ damage.‌‌ The‌‌ greater‌‌ the‌‌ potential‌‌ severity,‌‌ the‌‌ greater‌‌ its‌‌ priority‌‌ 
for‌‌a‌‌JSA.‌  ‌
● New‌  ‌Jobs‌  ‌or‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Change‌  ‌in‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Job:‌  ‌New‌  ‌operations‌  ‌created‌  ‌by‌  ‌changes‌  ‌in‌  ‌equipment‌  ‌or‌‌ 
processes‌‌
  obviously‌‌
  have‌‌
  no‌‌
  history‌‌
  of‌‌
  accidents,‌‌
  but‌‌ them‌‌ accident‌‌ potential‌‌ should‌‌ be‌‌ fully‌‌ 

 ‌
 ‌
FOPM-[‌DEPT‌‌ 
DOCUMENT‌‌NO.:‌  ‌
CODE]-[DOC‌‌CODE‌] ‌ ‌
ORIGINATOR:‌  ‌ MDFERRANCO‌  ‌
DOCUMENT‌‌TITLE:‌‌   ‌ DEPT‌‌CODE‌  ‌ [‌DEPT‌] ‌ ‌
DEPT‌‌HEAD‌  ‌ ASPASCUA‌  ‌
JOB‌‌HAZARD‌‌ANALYSIS‌  ‌ REVISION‌‌NO.:‌  ‌ 1‌  ‌
REVIEW‌‌CYCLE‌  ‌ ANNUAL‌‌   ‌
 ‌ PAGE‌‌NO.:‌‌   ‌ 4‌  ‌
 ‌

appreciated.‌  ‌A ‌ ‌JHA‌  ‌shall‌  ‌be‌  ‌made‌  ‌on‌‌


  every‌‌
  new‌‌
  job‌‌
  with‌‌
  potential‌‌
  hazards.‌‌
  Analysis‌‌
  should‌‌ 
not‌‌be‌‌delayed‌‌until‌‌an‌‌accident‌‌or‌‌incident‌‌occurs.‌  ‌

6.2. The‌‌
  Technical‌‌
  Supervisor,‌‌
  Maintenance‌‌
  Personnel,‌‌
  and/or‌‌
  contractor(s)‌‌
  responsible‌‌
  for‌‌
  the‌‌
  job/task‌‌ 
should‌  ‌perform‌  ‌the‌  ‌JHA‌  ‌using‌  ‌the‌  ‌J.H.A.‌  ‌Worksheet.‌  ‌The‌  ‌aforementioned‌  ‌personnel‌  ‌and/or‌‌ 
contractor(s)‌‌
  shall‌‌
  conduct‌‌
  the‌‌
  JHA‌‌
  with‌‌
  the‌‌
  help‌‌
  of‌‌ employees‌‌ who‌‌ regularly‌‌ perform‌‌ the‌‌ task.‌‌ The‌‌ 
job‌  ‌being‌  ‌analyzed‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌broken‌  ‌down‌  ‌into‌  ‌a ‌ ‌sequence‌‌
  of‌‌
  steps‌‌
  that‌‌
  describe‌‌
  the‌‌
  process‌‌
  in‌‌ 
detail.‌‌Avoid‌‌two‌‌common‌‌errors:‌  ‌
● Making‌‌the‌‌breakdown‌‌too‌‌detailed‌‌so‌‌that‌‌an‌‌unnecessarily‌‌large‌‌number‌‌of‌‌steps‌‌result;‌‌or‌  ‌
● Making‌‌the‌‌job‌‌breakdown‌‌so‌‌general‌‌that‌‌the‌‌basic‌‌steps‌‌are‌‌not‌‌distinguishable.‌  ‌

As‌  ‌a ‌ ‌rule,‌  ‌the‌  ‌JHA‌  ‌should‌  ‌contain‌  ‌less‌  ‌than‌  ‌12‌  ‌steps.‌  ‌If‌  ‌more‌‌
  steps‌‌
  are‌‌
  needed,‌‌
  the‌‌
  job‌‌
  should‌‌
  be‌‌ 
broken‌‌into‌‌separate‌‌tasks.‌  ‌
JHAs‌‌involve‌‌the‌‌following‌‌steps:‌  ‌
● Selecting‌‌a‌‌qualified‌‌person‌‌to‌‌perform‌‌the‌‌analysis‌  ‌
● Briefing‌‌the‌‌employee‌‌demonstrating‌‌the‌‌task‌‌on‌‌the‌‌purpose‌‌of‌‌the‌‌analysis‌  ‌
● Observing‌‌the‌‌performance‌‌of‌‌the‌‌job,‌‌and‌‌breaking‌‌it‌‌into‌‌basic‌‌steps‌  ‌
● Recording‌‌and‌‌describing‌‌each‌‌step‌‌in‌‌the‌‌breakdown‌  ‌
● Reviewing‌‌the‌‌breakdown‌‌and‌‌description‌‌with‌‌the‌‌person‌‌who‌‌performed‌‌the‌‌task.‌  ‌

  ‌Select‌‌
  an‌‌
  experienced,‌‌
  capable,‌‌
  and‌‌
  cooperative‌‌
  person‌‌
  who‌‌
  is‌‌
  willing‌‌
  to‌‌
  share‌‌
  ideas.‌‌
  They‌‌ should‌‌ 
be‌‌familiar‌‌with‌‌the‌‌purpose‌‌and‌‌method‌‌of‌‌a‌‌JHA.‌  ‌

Sometimes‌  ‌it‌  ‌is‌  ‌difficult‌  ‌for‌  ‌someone‌  ‌who‌  ‌is‌  ‌intimately‌  ‌familiar‌  ‌with‌  ‌a ‌ ‌job‌  ‌to‌‌
  describe‌‌
  it‌‌
  in‌‌
  detail.‌‌ 
Reviewing‌  ‌a ‌ ‌completed‌  ‌JHA‌  ‌before‌  ‌conducting‌  ‌one‌  ‌will‌  ‌help‌  ‌illustrate‌  ‌the‌  ‌terminology‌  ‌and‌‌ 
procedure‌‌to‌‌be‌‌followed.‌  ‌

Review‌‌
  the‌‌ breakdown‌‌ and‌‌ analysis‌‌ with‌‌ the‌‌ person‌‌ who‌‌ performed‌‌ the‌‌ job‌‌ to‌‌ ensure‌‌ agreement‌‌ of‌‌ 
the‌‌
  sequence‌‌
  and‌‌
  description‌‌
  of‌‌
  the‌‌
  steps.‌‌ Variations‌‌ of‌‌ routine‌‌ procedure‌‌ should‌‌ also‌‌ be‌‌ analyzed.‌‌ 
The‌‌wording‌‌for‌‌each‌‌step‌‌should‌‌be‌‌with‌‌action‌‌words‌‌such‌‌as‌‌“remove,”‌‌“open,”‌‌or‌‌“lift.”‌  ‌

6.3. Identify‌‌The‌‌Hazards‌  ‌
Hazards‌  ‌associated‌  ‌with‌  ‌each‌  ‌step‌  ‌are‌  ‌identified.‌  ‌To‌  ‌ensure‌  ‌a ‌ ‌thorough‌  ‌analysis,‌  ‌answer‌  ‌the‌‌ 
following‌‌questions‌‌about‌‌each‌‌step‌‌of‌‌the‌‌operation:‌  ‌
● Is‌‌
  there‌‌
  a ‌‌danger‌‌ of‌‌ striking‌‌ against,‌‌ being‌‌ struck‌‌ by,‌‌ or‌‌ otherwise‌‌ making‌‌ injurious‌‌ contact‌‌ 
with‌‌an‌‌object?‌  ‌
● Can‌‌the‌‌employee‌‌be‌‌caught‌‌in,‌‌by,‌‌or‌‌between‌‌the‌‌objects?‌  ‌

 ‌
 ‌
DOCUMENT‌‌NO.:‌  ‌ FOPM-CSHM-GQM07‌  ‌
ORIGINATOR:‌  ‌ MDFERRANCO‌  ‌
DEPT‌‌CODE‌  ‌ SSD‌  ‌
DOCUMENT‌‌TITLE:‌‌   ‌
DEPT‌‌HEAD‌  ‌ ASPASCUA‌  ‌
JOB‌‌HAZARD‌‌ANALYSIS‌  ‌ REVISION‌‌NO.:‌  ‌ 1‌  ‌
REVIEW‌‌CYCLE‌  ‌ ANNUAL‌  ‌
 ‌ PAGE‌‌NO.:‌‌   ‌ 5‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

● Is‌‌there‌‌a‌‌potential‌‌for‌‌a‌‌slip‌‌or‌‌trip?‌‌   ‌
● Can‌‌someone‌‌fall‌‌on‌‌the‌‌same‌‌level‌‌or‌‌to‌‌another?‌  ‌
● Can‌‌employees‌‌strain‌‌themselves‌‌by‌‌pushing,‌‌pulling,‌‌lifting,‌‌bending,‌‌or‌‌twisting?‌  ‌
● Is‌‌
  the‌‌
  environment‌‌
  hazardous‌‌
  to‌‌
  one’s‌‌
  health‌‌
  (toxic‌‌
  gas,‌‌
  vapor,‌‌ mist,‌‌ fumes,‌‌ dust,‌‌ heat,‌‌ or‌‌ 
radiation)?‌  ‌

Using‌  ‌the‌  ‌JHA‌  ‌Form,‌  ‌document‌  ‌hazards‌  ‌associated‌  ‌with‌  ‌each‌  ‌step.‌  ‌Check‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌personnel‌‌ 
who‌  ‌performed‌  ‌the‌  ‌job‌  ‌and‌  ‌others‌  ‌experienced‌  ‌in‌  ‌performing‌  ‌the‌  ‌job‌  ‌for‌  ‌additional‌  ‌ideas.‌  ‌A ‌‌
reliable‌‌list‌‌may‌‌be‌‌developed‌‌through‌‌observation‌‌and‌‌discussion.‌  ‌

6.4. Establish‌‌Solutions‌  ‌
The‌  ‌final‌  ‌step‌  ‌in‌  ‌job‌  ‌safety‌  ‌analysis‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌  ‌develop‌  ‌a ‌ ‌safe,‌  ‌efficient‌  ‌job‌  ‌procedure‌  ‌to‌  ‌prevent‌‌ 
accidents.‌  ‌The‌  ‌principal‌  ‌solutions‌  ‌for‌‌
  minimizing‌‌
  hazards‌‌
  that‌‌
  are‌‌
  identified‌‌
  in‌‌
  the‌‌
  analysis‌‌
  are‌‌
  as‌‌ 
follows:‌  ‌
● Find‌  ‌a ‌‌new‌‌
  way‌‌
  to‌‌
  do‌‌
  the‌‌
  job.‌‌
  To‌‌
  find‌‌
  an‌‌
  entirely‌‌
  new‌‌
  way‌‌
  to‌‌
  perform‌‌
  a ‌‌task,‌‌
  determine‌‌ 
the‌  ‌goal‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌operation‌  ‌and‌  ‌analyze‌  ‌the‌  ‌various‌  ‌ways‌‌
  of‌‌
  reaching‌‌
  this‌‌
  goal.‌‌
  Select‌‌
  the‌‌ 
safest‌‌method.‌‌Consider‌‌work‌‌saving‌‌tools‌‌and‌‌equipment.‌  ‌
● Change‌  ‌the‌  ‌physical‌  ‌conditions‌  ‌that‌  ‌create‌  ‌the‌  ‌hazard.‌  ‌If‌‌
  a ‌‌new‌‌
  way‌‌
  to‌‌
  perform‌‌
  the‌‌
  job‌‌ 
cannot‌‌ be‌‌ developed,‌‌ change‌‌ the‌‌ physical‌‌ conditions‌‌ (such‌‌ as‌‌ tools,‌‌ materials,‌‌ equipment,‌‌ 
layout,‌‌location)‌‌to‌‌eliminate‌‌or‌‌control‌‌the‌‌hazard.‌  ‌
● Change‌  ‌the‌  ‌work‌  ‌procedure‌  ‌to‌  ‌eliminate‌  ‌the‌  ‌hazard.‌  ‌Investigate‌  ‌changes‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌job‌‌ 
procedure‌‌ that‌‌ would‌‌ enable‌‌ employees‌‌ to‌‌ perform‌‌ the‌‌ task‌‌ without‌‌ being‌‌ exposed‌‌ to‌‌ the‌‌ 
hazard.‌  ‌
● Reduce‌‌
  the‌‌
  frequency‌‌
  of‌‌
  its‌‌
  performance.‌‌
  Often‌‌ a ‌‌repair‌‌ or‌‌ service‌‌ job‌‌ has‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ repeated‌‌ 
frequently‌‌
  because‌‌
  of‌‌
  another‌‌
  condition‌‌
  that‌‌
  needs‌‌
  correction.‌‌
  This‌‌
  is‌‌
  particularly‌‌
  true‌‌
  in‌‌ 
maintenance‌‌
  and‌‌
  material‌‌
  handling.‌‌
  To‌‌
  reduce‌‌
  the‌‌
  frequency‌‌
  of‌‌ a ‌‌repetitive‌‌ job,‌‌ eliminate‌‌ 
the‌‌ condition‌‌ or‌‌ practice‌‌ that‌‌ results‌‌ in‌‌ excessive‌‌ repairs‌‌ or‌‌ service.‌‌ If‌‌ the‌‌ condition‌‌ cannot‌‌ 
be‌  ‌eliminated,‌  ‌attempt‌  ‌to‌  ‌minimize‌  ‌the‌  ‌effect‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌condition.‌  ‌Reducing‌‌
  the‌‌
  number‌‌
  of‌‌ 
times‌  ‌a ‌ ‌job‌  ‌is‌  ‌performed‌  ‌contributes‌  ‌to‌  ‌safer‌  ‌operations‌  ‌only‌‌
  because‌‌
  the‌‌
  frequency‌‌
  of‌ 
exposure‌  ‌to‌  ‌the‌  ‌hazard‌  ‌is‌  ‌reduced.‌  ‌It‌  ‌is,‌  ‌of‌  ‌course,‌  ‌preferable‌  ‌to‌  ‌eliminate‌  ‌hazards‌  ‌and‌‌ 
prevent‌‌exposure‌‌by‌‌changing‌‌physical‌‌conditions‌‌or‌‌revising‌‌the‌‌job‌‌procedure‌‌or‌‌both.‌  ‌

In‌  ‌developing‌  ‌solutions,‌  ‌general‌  ‌precautions‌  ‌such‌  ‌as‌  ‌“be‌  ‌alert,”‌  ‌“use‌  ‌caution,”‌  ‌or‌  ‌“be‌‌ 
careful”‌  ‌are‌  ‌useless.‌  ‌Solutions‌  ‌shall‌  ‌precisely‌  ‌state‌  ‌what‌  ‌to‌  ‌do‌  ‌and‌  ‌how‌  ‌to‌  ‌do‌  ‌it.‌  ‌For‌‌ 
example,‌  ‌“make‌  ‌certain‌  ‌the‌‌
  wrench‌‌
  does‌‌
  not‌‌
  slip‌‌
  or‌‌
  cause‌‌
  loss‌‌
  of‌‌
  balance”‌‌
  does‌‌
  not‌‌
  tell‌‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
FOPM-[‌DEPT‌‌ 
DOCUMENT‌‌NO.:‌  ‌
CODE]-[DOC‌‌CODE‌] ‌ ‌
ORIGINATOR:‌  ‌ MDFERRANCO‌  ‌
DOCUMENT‌‌TITLE:‌‌   ‌ DEPT‌‌CODE‌  ‌ [‌DEPT‌] ‌ ‌
DEPT‌‌HEAD‌  ‌ ASPASCUA‌  ‌
JOB‌‌HAZARD‌‌ANALYSIS‌  ‌ REVISION‌‌NO.:‌  ‌ 1‌  ‌
REVIEW‌‌CYCLE‌  ‌ ANNUAL‌‌   ‌
 ‌ PAGE‌‌NO.:‌‌   ‌ 6‌  ‌
 ‌

how‌‌
  to‌‌
  prevent‌‌
  the‌‌
  wrench‌‌
  from‌‌
  slipping.‌‌
  A ‌‌good‌‌
  recommendation‌‌
  explains‌‌ both‌‌ “what”‌‌ 
and‌  ‌“how”.‌  ‌For‌  ‌example,‌  ‌“set‌  ‌wrench‌  ‌jaws‌‌
  securely‌‌
  on‌‌
  the‌‌
  bolt.‌‌
  Test‌‌
  its‌‌
  grip‌‌
  by‌‌
  exerting‌‌ 
slight‌  ‌pressure‌  ‌on‌  ‌it.‌‌
  Brace‌‌
  yourself‌‌
  against‌‌
  something‌‌
  immovable,‌‌
  or‌‌
  take‌‌
  a ‌‌solid‌‌
  stance‌‌ 
with‌  ‌feet‌  ‌wide‌  ‌apart,‌  ‌before‌  ‌exerting‌  ‌slow‌  ‌steady‌  ‌pressure.”‌  ‌This‌  ‌recommendation‌‌ 
reduces‌‌the‌‌possibility‌‌of‌‌a‌‌loss‌‌of‌‌balance‌‌if‌‌the‌‌wrench‌‌slips.‌  ‌

If‌  ‌a ‌ ‌job‌  ‌or‌  ‌process‌  ‌is‌  ‌changed‌  ‌dramatically,‌  ‌it‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌discussed‌  ‌with‌  ‌all‌  ‌personnel‌‌ 
involved‌‌
  to‌‌
  determine‌‌
  the‌‌
  possible‌‌
  consequences‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ changes.‌‌ Such‌‌ discussions‌‌ check‌‌ 
the‌‌accuracy‌‌of‌‌the‌‌JHA‌‌and‌‌involve‌‌personnel‌‌in‌‌an‌‌effort‌‌to‌‌reduce‌‌job‌‌hazards.‌  ‌

6.5. Conduct‌‌a‌‌follow‌‌up‌‌analysis‌  ‌
The‌  ‌Building‌  ‌Engineer‌  ‌or‌‌
  the‌‌
  Technical‌‌
  Supervisor‌‌
  should‌‌
  observe‌‌
  employees‌‌
  as‌‌
  they‌‌
  perform‌‌
  at‌‌ 
least‌  ‌one‌  ‌job‌  ‌for‌  ‌which‌  ‌a ‌ ‌JHA‌  ‌has‌  ‌been‌  ‌developed.‌  ‌The‌  ‌purpose‌  ‌of‌  ‌these‌  ‌observations‌  ‌is‌  ‌to‌‌ 
determine‌  ‌whether‌  ‌or‌  ‌not‌  ‌the‌  ‌employees‌  ‌are‌  ‌doing‌  ‌the‌  ‌jobs‌  ‌in‌  ‌accordance‌  ‌with‌  ‌the‌  ‌safety‌‌ 
procedures‌‌
  developed.‌‌
  The‌‌
  supervisor‌‌
  should‌‌
  review‌‌
  the‌‌
  JHA‌‌
  before‌‌
  doing‌‌
  the‌‌
  follow-up‌‌ review‌‌ 
to‌‌reinforce‌‌the‌‌proper‌‌procedures‌‌that‌‌are‌‌to‌‌be‌‌followed.‌  ‌

6.6. The‌‌Job‌‌Hazard‌‌Analysis‌  ‌
The‌  ‌JHA‌  ‌provides‌  ‌a ‌ ‌learning‌  ‌opportunity‌  ‌for‌  ‌the‌  ‌supervisor‌  ‌and‌  ‌employee.‌  ‌Copies‌  ‌of‌  ‌the‌  ‌JHA‌‌ 
should‌‌
  be‌‌
  distributed‌‌
  to‌‌
  all‌‌
  employees‌‌
  who‌‌
  perform‌‌
  that‌‌
  job.‌‌
  The‌‌ JHA‌‌ should‌‌ explain‌‌ the‌‌ analysis‌‌ 
to‌‌the‌‌employees‌‌and,‌‌if‌‌necessary,‌‌provide‌‌additional‌‌training.‌  ‌

New‌  ‌employees‌  ‌or‌  ‌employees‌  ‌asked‌  ‌to‌  ‌perform‌  ‌new‌‌


  tasks‌‌
  must‌‌
  be‌‌
  trained‌‌
  to‌‌
  use‌‌
  the‌‌
  safe‌‌
  and‌‌ 
efficient‌  ‌procedures‌  ‌developed‌  ‌in‌  ‌the‌  ‌JHA.‌  ‌The‌  ‌new‌  ‌employee‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌  ‌taught‌  ‌the‌  ‌correct‌‌ 
method‌  ‌to‌  ‌perform‌  ‌a ‌ ‌task‌‌
  before‌‌
  dangerous‌‌
  habits‌‌
  develop,‌‌
  to‌‌
  recognize‌‌
  the‌‌
  hazards‌‌
  associated‌‌ 
with‌‌
  each‌‌
  job‌‌
  step,‌‌ and‌‌ to‌‌ use‌‌ the‌‌ necessary‌‌ precautions‌‌ to‌‌ avoid‌‌ injury‌‌ or‌‌ accidents.‌‌ Jobs‌‌ that‌‌ are‌‌ 
performed‌‌
  infrequently‌‌
  require‌‌ additional‌‌ effect‌‌ to‌‌ minimize‌‌ accident‌‌ potential.‌‌ Pre-job‌‌ instruction‌‌ 
addressing‌  ‌the‌  ‌points‌  ‌listed‌  ‌on‌  ‌the‌  ‌JHA‌  ‌will‌  ‌serve‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌refresher‌  ‌to‌  ‌employees‌  ‌who‌  ‌may‌  ‌have‌‌ 
forgotten‌‌ some‌‌ of‌‌ the‌‌ hazards‌‌ in‌‌ performing‌‌ the‌‌ task‌‌ and‌‌ the‌‌ proper‌‌ procedure‌‌ to‌‌ be‌‌ used‌‌ to‌‌ avoid‌‌ 
these‌‌hazards.‌  ‌

Finally,‌  ‌the‌  ‌JHA‌  ‌is‌  ‌an‌  ‌incident/accident‌  ‌investigation‌  ‌tool.‌  ‌When‌  ‌incidents/accidents‌  ‌occur‌‌ 
involving‌‌
  a ‌‌job‌‌ for‌‌ which‌‌ a ‌‌JHA‌‌ has‌‌ been‌‌ performed,‌‌ the‌‌ analysis‌‌ should‌‌ be‌‌ reviewed‌‌ to‌‌ determine‌‌ 
if‌‌proper‌‌procedures‌‌were‌‌followed‌‌or‌‌if‌‌the‌‌procedures‌‌should‌‌be‌‌revised.‌  ‌

6.7. Safekeeping‌‌of‌‌JHA‌‌Forms‌  ‌
Documentation‌‌
  is‌‌
  an‌‌
  important‌‌
  part‌‌
  of‌‌
  performing‌‌ a ‌‌JHA.‌‌ Records‌‌ must‌‌ be‌‌ uniform‌‌ and‌‌ consistent‌‌ 
so‌‌
  that‌‌
  many‌‌
  people‌‌
  can‌‌
  understand‌‌
  and‌‌
  use‌‌
  this‌‌
  information.‌‌ JHA‌‌ forms‌‌ should‌‌ be‌‌ maintained‌‌ in‌‌ 
 ‌
 ‌
DOCUMENT‌‌NO.:‌  ‌ FOPM-CSHM-GQM07‌  ‌
ORIGINATOR:‌  ‌ MDFERRANCO‌  ‌
DEPT‌‌CODE‌  ‌ SSD‌  ‌
DOCUMENT‌‌TITLE:‌‌   ‌
DEPT‌‌HEAD‌  ‌ ASPASCUA‌  ‌
JOB‌‌HAZARD‌‌ANALYSIS‌  ‌ REVISION‌‌NO.:‌  ‌ 1‌  ‌
REVIEW‌‌CYCLE‌  ‌ ANNUAL‌  ‌
 ‌ PAGE‌‌NO.:‌‌   ‌ 7‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

the‌‌
  department‌‌
  creating‌‌
  the‌‌
  documents‌‌
  and‌‌
  should‌‌ be‌‌ readily‌‌ accessible.‌‌ An‌‌ index‌‌ identifying‌‌ the‌‌ 
job/task,‌  ‌the‌  ‌date‌  ‌the‌  ‌JHA‌  ‌was‌  ‌completed,‌  ‌and‌  ‌the‌  ‌date‌  ‌the‌  ‌analysis‌  ‌was‌  ‌revised‌  ‌should‌  ‌be‌‌ 
maintained.‌  ‌
 ‌
7. TRAINING‌‌AND‌‌EDUCATION‌  ‌
7.1. Initial‌‌Training‌  ‌
● All‌‌new‌‌employees‌‌will‌‌be‌‌trained‌‌on‌‌existing‌‌JHAs.‌  ‌
● New‌‌
  employees‌‌
  or‌‌
  employees‌‌
  who‌‌
  are‌‌
  asked‌‌
  to‌‌
  perform‌‌
  new‌‌ jobs/tasks‌‌ shall‌‌ be‌‌ trained‌‌ 
to‌‌use‌‌the‌‌procedures‌‌developed‌‌in‌‌the‌‌JHA.‌  ‌

7.2. Refresher‌‌training‌  ‌
● Safety‌  ‌and‌  ‌Security‌  ‌Department‌  ‌will‌  ‌perform‌  ‌a ‌ ‌Safety‌  ‌and‌  ‌Security‌  ‌Refresher‌  ‌training‌‌ 
annually‌‌to‌‌operations‌‌which‌‌will‌‌include‌‌the‌‌reiteration‌‌of‌‌the‌‌JHA.‌  ‌
● Operations‌  ‌will‌  ‌perform‌  ‌and‌  ‌document‌  ‌employee‌  ‌training‌  ‌on‌  ‌completed/existing‌  ‌JHAs‌‌
  at‌‌ 
least‌‌annually.‌  ‌
● Jobs‌‌
  that‌‌ are‌‌ performed‌‌ infrequently‌‌ require‌‌ additional‌‌ effort‌‌ to‌‌ minimize‌‌ accident‌‌ potential.‌‌ 
Pre-job‌  ‌instruction‌  ‌will‌  ‌serve‌  ‌as‌  ‌a ‌ ‌refresher‌  ‌so‌  ‌that‌‌
  employees‌‌
  may‌‌
  remember‌‌
  and‌‌
  avoid‌‌ 
any‌‌hazards.‌  ‌

7.3. Recordkeeping‌  ‌
● Maintain‌‌
  a ‌‌copy‌‌
  of‌‌
  employee‌‌
  training‌‌
  records‌‌
  for‌‌
  a ‌‌minimum‌‌
  of‌‌ three‌‌ years.‌‌ JHA‌‌ forms‌‌ will‌‌ 
be‌‌maintained‌‌and‌‌readily‌‌accessible.‌  ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
FOPM-[‌DEPT‌‌ 
DOCUMENT‌‌NO.:‌  ‌
CODE]-[DOC‌‌CODE‌] ‌ ‌
ORIGINATOR:‌  ‌ MDFERRANCO‌  ‌
DOCUMENT‌‌TITLE:‌‌   ‌ DEPT‌‌CODE‌  ‌ [‌DEPT‌] ‌ ‌
DEPT‌‌HEAD‌  ‌ ASPASCUA‌  ‌
JOB‌‌HAZARD‌‌ANALYSIS‌  ‌ REVISION‌‌NO.:‌  ‌ 1‌  ‌
REVIEW‌‌CYCLE‌  ‌ ANNUAL‌‌   ‌
 ‌ PAGE‌‌NO.:‌‌   ‌ 8‌  ‌
 ‌
 ‌

8. PROCEDURAL‌‌CONTENT‌‌(FLOWCHART)‌  ‌
8.1. JHA‌‌Flowchart‌  ‌

 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

 ‌
 ‌
DOCUMENT‌‌NO.:‌  ‌ FOPM-CSHM-GQM07‌  ‌
ORIGINATOR:‌  ‌ MDFERRANCO‌  ‌
DEPT‌‌CODE‌  ‌ SSD‌  ‌
DOCUMENT‌‌TITLE:‌‌   ‌
DEPT‌‌HEAD‌  ‌ ASPASCUA‌  ‌
JOB‌‌HAZARD‌‌ANALYSIS‌  ‌ REVISION‌‌NO.:‌  ‌ 1‌  ‌
REVIEW‌‌CYCLE‌  ‌ ANNUAL‌  ‌
 ‌ PAGE‌‌NO.:‌‌   ‌ 9‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

9. DOCUMENT/FORMS‌  ‌
9.1. Job‌‌Hazard‌‌Analysis‌‌Form‌  ‌

 ‌

 ‌

 ‌

 ‌
 ‌
FOPM-[‌DEPT‌‌ 
DOCUMENT‌‌NO.:‌  ‌
CODE]-[DOC‌‌CODE‌] ‌ ‌
ORIGINATOR:‌  ‌ MDFERRANCO‌  ‌
DOCUMENT‌‌TITLE:‌‌   ‌ DEPT‌‌CODE‌  ‌ [‌DEPT‌] ‌ ‌
DEPT‌‌HEAD‌  ‌ ASPASCUA‌  ‌
JOB‌‌HAZARD‌‌ANALYSIS‌  ‌ REVISION‌‌NO.:‌  ‌ 1‌  ‌
REVIEW‌‌CYCLE‌  ‌ ANNUAL‌‌   ‌
 ‌ PAGE‌‌NO.:‌‌   ‌ 10‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

 ‌

 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌
 ‌

 ‌
 ‌
DOCUMENT‌‌NO.:‌  ‌ FOPM-CSHM-GQM07‌  ‌
ORIGINATOR:‌  ‌ MDFERRANCO‌  ‌
DEPT‌‌CODE‌  ‌ SSD‌  ‌
DOCUMENT‌‌TITLE:‌‌   ‌
DEPT‌‌HEAD‌  ‌ ASPASCUA‌  ‌
JOB‌‌HAZARD‌‌ANALYSIS‌  ‌ REVISION‌‌NO.:‌  ‌ 1‌  ‌
REVIEW‌‌CYCLE‌  ‌ ANNUAL‌  ‌
 ‌ PAGE‌‌NO.:‌‌   ‌ 11‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

10. REFERENCES‌  ‌
10.1. DOLE‌  ‌Department‌  ‌Order‌  ‌198-18‌  ‌– ‌ ‌Chapter‌  ‌IV,‌‌
  Section‌‌
  12‌‌
  – ‌‌Basic‌‌
  Components‌‌
  of‌‌
  Company‌‌
  OSH‌‌ 
Program‌‌and‌‌Policy‌‌(Jan.‌‌2019)‌  ‌
10.2. State‌  ‌of‌  ‌New‌  ‌Orleans‌  ‌– ‌ ‌Environmental‌  ‌Health‌‌
  and‌‌
  Safety‌‌
  Commission.‌‌
  Job‌‌
  Safety‌‌
  Analysis,‌‌
  2019‌‌ 
Edition‌  ‌
10.3. University‌‌
  of‌‌
  Washington‌‌
  – ‌‌Environmental‌‌
  Health‌‌
  & ‌‌Safety‌‌
  Department‌‌
  Job‌‌
  Hazard‌‌
  Analysis‌‌ 2019‌‌ 
Edition‌  ‌
 ‌

 ‌

You might also like