Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Job Hazard Analysis
Job Hazard Analysis
FOPM-[DEPT
DOCUMENTNO.:
CODE]-[DOCCODE]
ORIGINATOR: MDFERRANCO
DOCUMENTTITLE: DEPTCODE SSD
DEPTHEAD ASPASCUA
JOBHAZARDANALYSIS REVISIONNO.: 1
REVIEWCYCLE ANNUAL
PAGENO.: 1
TABLEOFCONTENTS
FOPM-[DEPT
DOCUMENTNO.:
CODE]-[DOCCODE]
ORIGINATOR: MDFERRANCO
DOCUMENTTITLE: DEPTCODE [DEPT]
DEPTHEAD ASPASCUA
JOBHAZARDANALYSIS REVISIONNO.: 1
REVIEWCYCLE ANNUAL
PAGENO.: 2
1. PURPOSE
1.1. A Job Hazard Analysis (JHA) is
an
analysis
of
the
hazards
and
risks
associated
with
work/activities
which focuses on identifying and controlling hazards. Utilizing the JHA will provide a process of
analyzing the work activities; identifying the tools, materials, and equipment needed to develop
work methods and procedures for accomplishing the task. The process
will
identify
existing
and
potentialhazardsandassesstheriskandidentifymethodstoeliminateormitigatethesaidrisk.
2. SCOPE
2.1. ThepolicyappliestoallFOPMmanagedproperties.JHAsmustbeperformedonallactivitiesthat:
● Haveresultedinanincident/accidenttrendordeath.
● Haveapotentialforsevereinjuryorpropertydamage.
TheJHAmustbere-evaluatedwhenanychangesinjobproceduresorequipmentoccurs.
3. DEFINITIONOFTERMS
3.1. Controls:Thisishowtoeliminateorminimizethehazards.Therearethreetypesofcontrols
● Engineering Controls eliminate or reduce exposure to a chemical
or
physical
hazard
through
theuseorsubstitutionofengineeredmachineryorequipment. Thisisthepreferredcontrol.
● Administrative
Controls
are
changes
in
work
procedures
such
as
written
safety policies, rules,
supervision, schedules, and training with the goal of reducing the duration, frequency, and
severityofexposuretohazardouschemicalsorsituations.
● Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) – Personal
protective
equipment,
commonly
referred
to
as “PPE”, is equipment worn to minimize exposure to hazards that cause serious workplace
injuriesandillnesses.
3.2. Exposure–Whenanemployeeentersa“dangerzone”byvirtueoftheirproximitytothehazard.
3.3. Hazard
– An
unsafe
condition
or
practice
that
could
cause
injury,
illness, or property damage and
is preventable. Examples of hazards include: working at heights, slippery surfaces, exposed
moving
machinery
parts, fire, explosion, noise, electricity, toxic emission, corrosive chemicals, low
oxygen,repetitivetasks,heavylifting,infectiousBloodbornepathogens,assault.
3.4. Job Hazard Analysis – A process that
focus
on
job
task
as
a way
to
identify
hazards
before
they
result in injury. It focuses on the relationship between the worker, the task, the tools and
equipment,andtheenvironmentandidentifiescontroltoreduceoreliminatethehazard.
DOCUMENTNO.: FOPM-CSHM-GQM07
ORIGINATOR: MDFERRANCO
DEPTCODE SSD
DOCUMENTTITLE:
DEPTHEAD ASPASCUA
JOBHAZARDANALYSIS REVISIONNO.: 1
REVIEWCYCLE ANNUAL
PAGENO.: 3
3.5. Task – Any activity (mental or physical or both) that has been assigned to an employee as a
responsibility and carries with it both positive and/or negative consequences based on the
performanceofthatjob.
4. ROLESANDRESPONSIBILITIES
4.1. SafetyandSecurityDepartment
● ReviewallapplicableJHAsinpost-incident/accidentsituations.
●
Responsiblefortheimplementationofthisprocedure.
●
Responsibleforinvestigationifalapseinthisprocedureoccurred.
4.2. Operations
● Responsible for ensuring that this procedure is adhered to and implemented in their
respectivemanagedproperty.
5. GUIDELINES
5.1. The JHA is a systematic
method
of
identifying
hazards
and
control
measures
to
safely
perform
a
specific job or task. The process involves breaking down a particular job/task into a series of
simplesteps.Ineachofthesesteps,hazardsareidentifiedanddocumentedusingJHAForm.
6. PROCEDURALCONTENT
6.1. SelectingtheJob/Task
In
selecting jobs to be analyzed and in establishing the order of analysis, the following factors should
beconsidered.Theyarelistedinorderofimportance.
● Occurrence
of injuries: Jobs that have produced an incident or accident trend, or death, during
thepastthreeyearsshallbeanalyzed.
● Frequency
of
Accidents:
Jobs
that
repeatedly
produce
accidents
(trends)
are
candidates
for a
JHA.
The
greater
the
number
of
accidents
associated
with
the job, the greater its priority for a
JHA. Subsequent injuries indicate that preventive action
taken
prior
to
their
occurrence
was
notsuccessful.
● Potential
Severity:
Some
jobs
may
not
have
a history
of
accidents but may have the potential
for
severe
injury
or
property damage. The greater the potential severity, the greater its priority
foraJSA.
● New Jobs or a Change in a Job: New operations created by changes in equipment or
processes
obviously
have
no
history
of
accidents,
but them accident potential should be fully
FOPM-[DEPT
DOCUMENTNO.:
CODE]-[DOCCODE]
ORIGINATOR: MDFERRANCO
DOCUMENTTITLE: DEPTCODE [DEPT]
DEPTHEAD ASPASCUA
JOBHAZARDANALYSIS REVISIONNO.: 1
REVIEWCYCLE ANNUAL
PAGENO.: 4
6.2. The
Technical
Supervisor,
Maintenance
Personnel,
and/or
contractor(s)
responsible
for
the
job/task
should perform the JHA using the J.H.A. Worksheet. The aforementioned personnel and/or
contractor(s)
shall
conduct
the
JHA
with
the
help
of employees who regularly perform the task. The
job being analyzed should be broken down into a sequence
of
steps
that
describe
the
process
in
detail.Avoidtwocommonerrors:
● Makingthebreakdowntoodetailedsothatanunnecessarilylargenumberofstepsresult;or
● Makingthejobbreakdownsogeneralthatthebasicstepsarenotdistinguishable.
As a rule, the JHA should contain less than 12 steps. If more
steps
are
needed,
the
job
should
be
brokenintoseparatetasks.
JHAsinvolvethefollowingsteps:
● Selectingaqualifiedpersontoperformtheanalysis
● Briefingtheemployeedemonstratingthetaskonthepurposeoftheanalysis
● Observingtheperformanceofthejob,andbreakingitintobasicsteps
● Recordinganddescribingeachstepinthebreakdown
● Reviewingthebreakdownanddescriptionwiththepersonwhoperformedthetask.
Select
an
experienced,
capable,
and
cooperative
person
who
is
willing
to
share
ideas.
They should
befamiliarwiththepurposeandmethodofaJHA.
Sometimes it is difficult for someone who is intimately familiar with a job to
describe
it
in
detail.
Reviewing a completed JHA before conducting one will help illustrate the terminology and
proceduretobefollowed.
Review
the breakdown and analysis with the person who performed the job to ensure agreement of
the
sequence
and
description
of
the
steps. Variations of routine procedure should also be analyzed.
Thewordingforeachstepshouldbewithactionwordssuchas“remove,”“open,”or“lift.”
6.3. IdentifyTheHazards
Hazards associated with each step are identified. To ensure a thorough analysis, answer the
followingquestionsabouteachstepoftheoperation:
● Is
there
a danger of striking against, being struck by, or otherwise making injurious contact
withanobject?
● Cantheemployeebecaughtin,by,orbetweentheobjects?
DOCUMENTNO.: FOPM-CSHM-GQM07
ORIGINATOR: MDFERRANCO
DEPTCODE SSD
DOCUMENTTITLE:
DEPTHEAD ASPASCUA
JOBHAZARDANALYSIS REVISIONNO.: 1
REVIEWCYCLE ANNUAL
PAGENO.: 5
● Isthereapotentialforasliportrip?
● Cansomeonefallonthesamelevelortoanother?
● Canemployeesstrainthemselvesbypushing,pulling,lifting,bending,ortwisting?
● Is
the
environment
hazardous
to
one’s
health
(toxic
gas,
vapor, mist, fumes, dust, heat, or
radiation)?
Using the JHA Form, document hazards associated with each step. Check with the personnel
who performed the job and others experienced in performing the job for additional ideas. A
reliablelistmaybedevelopedthroughobservationanddiscussion.
6.4. EstablishSolutions
The final step in job safety analysis is to develop a safe, efficient job procedure to prevent
accidents. The principal solutions for
minimizing
hazards
that
are
identified
in
the
analysis
are
as
follows:
● Find a new
way
to
do
the
job.
To
find
an
entirely
new
way
to
perform
a task,
determine
the goal of the operation and analyze the various ways
of
reaching
this
goal.
Select
the
safestmethod.Considerworksavingtoolsandequipment.
● Change the physical conditions that create the hazard. If
a new
way
to
perform
the
job
cannot be developed, change the physical conditions (such as tools, materials, equipment,
layout,location)toeliminateorcontrolthehazard.
● Change the work procedure to eliminate the hazard. Investigate changes in the job
procedure that would enable employees to perform the task without being exposed to the
hazard.
● Reduce
the
frequency
of
its
performance.
Often a repair or service job has to be repeated
frequently
because
of
another
condition
that
needs
correction.
This
is
particularly
true
in
maintenance
and
material
handling.
To
reduce
the
frequency
of a repetitive job, eliminate
the condition or practice that results in excessive repairs or service. If the condition cannot
be eliminated, attempt to minimize the effect of the condition. Reducing
the
number
of
times a job is performed contributes to safer operations only
because
the
frequency
of
exposure to the hazard is reduced. It is, of course, preferable to eliminate hazards and
preventexposurebychangingphysicalconditionsorrevisingthejobprocedureorboth.
In developing solutions, general precautions such as “be alert,” “use caution,” or “be
careful” are useless. Solutions shall precisely state what to do and how to do it. For
example, “make certain the
wrench
does
not
slip
or
cause
loss
of
balance”
does
not
tell
FOPM-[DEPT
DOCUMENTNO.:
CODE]-[DOCCODE]
ORIGINATOR: MDFERRANCO
DOCUMENTTITLE: DEPTCODE [DEPT]
DEPTHEAD ASPASCUA
JOBHAZARDANALYSIS REVISIONNO.: 1
REVIEWCYCLE ANNUAL
PAGENO.: 6
how
to
prevent
the
wrench
from
slipping.
A good
recommendation
explains both “what”
and “how”. For example, “set wrench jaws
securely
on
the
bolt.
Test
its
grip
by
exerting
slight pressure on it.
Brace
yourself
against
something
immovable,
or
take
a solid
stance
with feet wide apart, before exerting slow steady pressure.” This recommendation
reducesthepossibilityofalossofbalanceifthewrenchslips.
If a job or process is changed dramatically, it should be discussed with all personnel
involved
to
determine
the
possible
consequences of the changes. Such discussions check
theaccuracyoftheJHAandinvolvepersonnelinanefforttoreducejobhazards.
6.5. Conductafollowupanalysis
The Building Engineer or
the
Technical
Supervisor
should
observe
employees
as
they
perform
at
least one job for which a JHA has been developed. The purpose of these observations is to
determine whether or not the employees are doing the jobs in accordance with the safety
procedures
developed.
The
supervisor
should
review
the
JHA
before
doing
the
follow-up review
toreinforcetheproperproceduresthataretobefollowed.
6.6. TheJobHazardAnalysis
The JHA provides a learning opportunity for the supervisor and employee. Copies of the JHA
should
be
distributed
to
all
employees
who
perform
that
job.
The JHA should explain the analysis
totheemployeesand,ifnecessary,provideadditionaltraining.
Finally, the JHA is an incident/accident investigation tool. When incidents/accidents occur
involving
a job for which a JHA has been performed, the analysis should be reviewed to determine
ifproperprocedureswerefollowedoriftheproceduresshouldberevised.
6.7. SafekeepingofJHAForms
Documentation
is
an
important
part
of
performing a JHA. Records must be uniform and consistent
so
that
many
people
can
understand
and
use
this
information. JHA forms should be maintained in
DOCUMENTNO.: FOPM-CSHM-GQM07
ORIGINATOR: MDFERRANCO
DEPTCODE SSD
DOCUMENTTITLE:
DEPTHEAD ASPASCUA
JOBHAZARDANALYSIS REVISIONNO.: 1
REVIEWCYCLE ANNUAL
PAGENO.: 7
the
department
creating
the
documents
and
should be readily accessible. An index identifying the
job/task, the date the JHA was completed, and the date the analysis was revised should be
maintained.
7. TRAININGANDEDUCATION
7.1. InitialTraining
● AllnewemployeeswillbetrainedonexistingJHAs.
● New
employees
or
employees
who
are
asked
to
perform
new jobs/tasks shall be trained
tousetheproceduresdevelopedintheJHA.
7.2. Refreshertraining
● Safety and Security Department will perform a Safety and Security Refresher training
annuallytooperationswhichwillincludethereiterationoftheJHA.
● Operations will perform and document employee training on completed/existing JHAs
at
leastannually.
● Jobs
that are performed infrequently require additional effort to minimize accident potential.
Pre-job instruction will serve as a refresher so that
employees
may
remember
and
avoid
anyhazards.
7.3. Recordkeeping
● Maintain
a copy
of
employee
training
records
for
a minimum
of three years. JHA forms will
bemaintainedandreadilyaccessible.
FOPM-[DEPT
DOCUMENTNO.:
CODE]-[DOCCODE]
ORIGINATOR: MDFERRANCO
DOCUMENTTITLE: DEPTCODE [DEPT]
DEPTHEAD ASPASCUA
JOBHAZARDANALYSIS REVISIONNO.: 1
REVIEWCYCLE ANNUAL
PAGENO.: 8
8. PROCEDURALCONTENT(FLOWCHART)
8.1. JHAFlowchart
DOCUMENTNO.: FOPM-CSHM-GQM07
ORIGINATOR: MDFERRANCO
DEPTCODE SSD
DOCUMENTTITLE:
DEPTHEAD ASPASCUA
JOBHAZARDANALYSIS REVISIONNO.: 1
REVIEWCYCLE ANNUAL
PAGENO.: 9
9. DOCUMENT/FORMS
9.1. JobHazardAnalysisForm
FOPM-[DEPT
DOCUMENTNO.:
CODE]-[DOCCODE]
ORIGINATOR: MDFERRANCO
DOCUMENTTITLE: DEPTCODE [DEPT]
DEPTHEAD ASPASCUA
JOBHAZARDANALYSIS REVISIONNO.: 1
REVIEWCYCLE ANNUAL
PAGENO.: 10
DOCUMENTNO.: FOPM-CSHM-GQM07
ORIGINATOR: MDFERRANCO
DEPTCODE SSD
DOCUMENTTITLE:
DEPTHEAD ASPASCUA
JOBHAZARDANALYSIS REVISIONNO.: 1
REVIEWCYCLE ANNUAL
PAGENO.: 11
10. REFERENCES
10.1. DOLE Department Order 198-18 – Chapter IV,
Section
12
– Basic
Components
of
Company
OSH
ProgramandPolicy(Jan.2019)
10.2. State of New Orleans – Environmental Health
and
Safety
Commission.
Job
Safety
Analysis,
2019
Edition
10.3. University
of
Washington
– Environmental
Health
& Safety
Department
Job
Hazard
Analysis 2019
Edition