Subject: Spl Laws output guide

Output guidelines:
1. Read the case People vs Sapla June 16, 2020 and answer the questions below.
INDIVIDUAL WORK.
2. Answer should be in word document format, 12 font, times new roman.
3. Copying a substantial portion of the jurisprudence is not allowed, unless proper citation
is provided, not to mention the legal repercussions for intellectual dishonesty. Construct
your own sentence/sentences.
4. Deadline for submission will be on or before March 28, 2022, to be submitted to
(justforattyg@yahoo.com) Submission after the deadline will be considered to have not
submitted at all.
5. For clarifications, contact me at 0977-2511454.

CRITERIA FOR GRADING

Ability to identify and apply the legal principle with excellent logical 9-10 points
presentation and appropriate use of the language of law.
Ability to identify and apply the legal principle but with some infirmities in the 6-8 points
logical reasoning and language of law.
Unable to identify the legal principle but shows logical reasoning and good 3-5 points
command of language of law in the answer.
Unable to identify the legal principle with poor logical reasoning.  Defective 1-2 points
use of the language of law.
No answer.  Yes or No answer without any explanation.  0 point

Read the case of People vs Sapla, GR 244045, June 16, 2020, and answer the following
questions.
1. Is police “tip” enough to cause warrantless search?
2. Why did the Supreme Court considered the “tip” double hearsay in the case?