Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Etnografica 2630
Etnografica 2630
Electronic version
URL: https://journals.openedition.org/etnografica/2630
DOI: 10.4000/etnografica.2630
ISSN: 2182-2891
Publisher
Centro em Rede de Investigação em Antropologia
Printed version
Date of publication: 1 February 2013
Number of pages: 207-209
ISSN: 0873-6561
Electronic reference
Ines Hasselberg, “Shahram Khosravi, “Illegal” Traveller: An Auto-Ethnography of Borders”, Etnográfica
[Online], vol. 17 (1) | 2013, Online since 13 March 2013, connection on 09 February 2022. URL: http://
journals.openedition.org/etnografica/2630 ; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/etnografica.2630
Shahram Khosravi life” (p. 5). I contend that the author has
“ILLEGAL” TRAVELLER: managed to do so successfully by relating
AN AUTO-ETHNOGRAPHY his own border narrative, and those of his
OF BORDERS informants, to the relevant academic lit-
Basingstoke and New York, erature, particularly in a discussion of the
Palgrave Macmillan, 2010, 160 pages, regulation of human mobility through the
ISBN: 978-0-230-23079-8 nation-state system.
The book is divided into nine main sec-
tions, encompassing an introduction, seven
To say that Khosravi’s “Illegal” Traveller: An chapters and a coda. It further contains
Auto-Ethnography of Borders is a book about an appendix detailing the destinations of
border crossing is an understatement. This the migrants we come to know through-
is a book about sensory and embodied out the book, i. e. Khosravi’s co-travellers,
experiences of borders from different stand- and a preface that marks the issues to be
points, where current debates on the regu- dealt with through the description of two
lation of human mobility are approached separate events: the author’s own step
through the author’s own. into illegality at the Iran/Afghanistan bor-
Auto-ethnographies have often been der, and the suicide of an Iranian asylum
criticised for being too emotional and seeker in a Swedish detention centre about
unscientific, but in fact the value of an 20 years later. Thus the book commences.
auto-ethnography is indeed in its ability to Chapter 1, “Accustomed soil”, sets the stage
convey to the reader the emotional experi- for the author’s own migration experience
ences of the author who is simultaneously and journey into illegality. Here Khosravi
the ethnographer and his own research par- is an Iranian young man, driven into a
ticipant, if you will. This book is not a biog- clandestine existence (to avoid certain
raphy and it is certainly not to be taken as a death at war) much before he decided to
novel. It is an ethnography in its true mean- flee the country. In this chapter the author
ing. Ethnographic data is presented, rich highlights elements of choice in contexts of
empirical insights are provided, pertinent “forced” migration, refusing analyses that
questions are raised, analysis is discussed portray migrants as destitute of agency.
and points are argued. In his introduc- The following two chapters discuss
tion, Khosravi advocates the usefulness of issues of migrant illegality. Chapter 2,
auto-ethnography to “explore abstract con- “Border guards and border people”,
cepts of policy and law and translate them explores the author’s attempts to exit Iran
into cultural terms grounded in everyday and his life as an illegal migrant in Pakistan,
208 RECENSÕES etnográfica fevereiro de 2013 17 (1): 207-211
in transit to the West. His personal narra- formally included, the “unwanted migrant”
tive is intertwined with reflections on the is forever a guest, a stranger in the domain
border, sacrifice, and the dehumanisation of his host.
of border crossers. It is in Pakistan that In Chapter 5, “Homelessness”, Khosravi
Khosravi has his first asylum interview returns to Iran to visit his family. His
hearing prompting him to discuss matters encounter with a young undocumented
of rights: while the law was available to him Afghan couple in his hometown makes him
and others in similar circumstances, it was question the conceptualisation of the host/
not accessible to them. From this chapter guest divide and its powerful rootedness in
on the reader is introduced to, and gets citizenship. Feeling alienated (not at home
acquainted with, the people who formed in Iran, not at home in Sweden) Khosravi
part of his journey: a series of individuals discusses homelessness as a paradigm and
from varying backgrounds and positions a lifestyle suggesting that “only when home
who challenge stereotypical impersonations has vanished and humanity is no longer
of the drug dealer, the human smuggler, territorialised, only then, there will be a
the border guard, and the undocumented chance for humanity” (p. 96). The follow-
migrant. Chapter 3, “The community of ing chapter, “We borders”, takes further the
displacement”, addresses the perils and discussion of the border. When returning to
dangers of fleeing to the West. These are Sweden after travelling abroad, Khosravi,
coupled with the generosity and hospital- now a Swedish citizen, is constantly the
ity of many strangers the author encounters subject of racial profiling at the border, pres-
along his way – the importance of social sured to “live up to his passport”. Borders
networks and religion in the migration are everywhere, the author contends when
process are noted. Here Khosravi discusses discussing the process of making borders of
too the arbitrariness of the illegal journey; people: the unwanted are not just excluded
how often the end destination, the routes, at the border but are themselves “forced to
and experiences of border crossing are the be border” (p. 99). Again here the law is
result more of chance rather than choice. available but not accessible, and the reader
It is upon arrival in Sweden that Khosravi becomes engaged in a discussion of the law
is made to feel shame over his illegality. as grounded in a world organised through
The author ends the chapter emphasising nation-states thus excluding those who fall
how intensely the border can be felt. He outside it. This discussion is taken further
becomes an asylum seeker subjected to in Chapter 7, “Right to have rights”. Taking
questioning and surveillance. Derrida, Kant and Benhabib as key points
In Chapter 4, “The invisible border”, of reference, hospitality is again ques-
the author’s standpoint changes once tioned, and is presented as conditional.
again, this time from “asylum seeker” into It is provided only for those who deserve, the
“refugee”. Here the issues of hospitality “good productive migrants”. He describes
are grounded in a discussion of the invis- migrants’ experiences as those of “hostile
ible borders – the borders of the mind, elu- hospitality”.
sive, unreachable, impossible to cross. The Overall, when exploring how policies
author’s account of his own experience and and the law are lived and experienced,
that of his informants as refugees and asy- Khosravi engages in an important field of
lum seekers in Sweden reveals how invisible study within anthropology and migration
borders work to prevent the “unwanted” studies that does not divorce the migra-
from belonging. Even if they have been tion experience from that of settlement,
RECENSÕES 209