Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LEXIS.
CHARACTERISTICS OF WORD FORMATION IN
ENGLISH.
PREFIXATION, SUFFIXATION AND
COMPOUNDING
0. INTRODUCTION
1. LEXICOGRAPHY AND MORPHOLOGY
1.1. Evolution of Dictionaries
2. WORD-FORMATION: PROCESSES
3. AFFIXATION OR DERIVATION
3.1 Prefixation
3.2 Suffixation
3.3 Compounding
4. CONCLUSION
5. BIBLIOGRAPHY
The English language is, as any other language, a living entity which keeps on changing. One
significant aspect is the overwhelming growth of vocabulary, mainly due to the wide range
of possibilities that word-formation offers. English has, therefore, an impressive flexibility in
constructing new words following a set of rules.
The most significant development in linguistic theory and research in recent years was the
rise of generative grammar, and, more especially, of transformational-generative grammar,
or transformational grammar, as it came to be known in the mid-1950s. As first presented
by Chomsky in Syntactic Structures (1957), transformational grammar can be seen partly as
a reaction against post-Bloomfieldian structuralism and partly as a continuation of it. This
was a book that, in fact, revolutionized the development of theoretical linguistics.
Of course, Chomsky's theories soon influenced word-formation, but this did not take place
until the publication of The Sound Pattern of English, which applied the Transformational-
Generative paradigm to word-formation. This was based on an American tradition of
Morphophonemics concerned with specifying rules which generate all the surface shapes of
a morpheme from a single underlying representation. For example, /naif/ and /naiv/ are
both surface forms of the morpheme "knife", the second form occurring in the plural.
Thus, over the course of this study we shall attempt to provide a detailed account of the
English lexis, paying special attention to word-formation, prefixation, suffixation and
compounding respectively.
All of this has been foregrounded on a set of the most influential authors in the field,
namely, Quirk and Greenbaum, A University Grammar of English (1979) and Leech and
Svartvik, A Communicative Grammar of English (1975).
Lexicon is, according to linguistics, the vocabulary of a language. Therefore, lexicology is the
study of the lexicon of a language (relations among words, formation of words...). Apart
from this, every language is said to be trimodal, i.e., structured in three modes, namely,
phonology, grammar and lexis.
Lexicography is the art and science of compiling works such as dictionaries, glossaries,
thesaurus, synonym guides, where items of vocabulary are described. Traditionally,
lexicography has been of two kinds: alphabetic lexicography, whose best-known product is
the dictionary properly so called, and thematic lexicography, which arranges words by
themes and topics, usually accompanied by an index, Roget's Thesaurus being a leading
example.
Moreover, lexicography is best understood if Saussure structuralist theories are taken into
account: the linguistic sign can be divided into signified and signifier. These two can be in
turn subdivided into form and content, being the sphere of content the one concerned with
the lexis:
2. WORD-FORMATION: PROCESSES
The word in English may be simple, formed by one constituent only, such as "apple", "bat",
"hammer"; or it may be complex, containing more than one constituent, such as "blackbird",
"fourth". The elements of a complex word may be free forms, i.e., elements which are
independent in other contexts, as those in "blackbird" and "devil-may-care"; or they may be
bound forms: prefixes and suffixes, which never appear independently, like the first and the
last constituents of 'uneatable' or the 'th' of 'fourth'. Simple and complex words alike are
distinguished from other constructions, it is generally agreed, by the fixed order of their
1
Economical nature of languages.
2
We distinguish the base of a derived word from the stem, which is the part of the word remaining after every affix has
been removed; friend in the word unfriendliness. in a word which has only one affix, such as friendly, the stem (friend) is
also the base; friendly is the base, but not the stem, of unfriendly .
Derivation or affixation is the process that results in the formation of new lexemes, either
using prefixes which are added to the front of a base; or using a suffix which is added to the
end of a base, with or without a change of the word class. For example, director - co-
director; drive - driver.
3.1. Prefixation
Prefixes do not generally alter the word-class of the base. Productive prefixes normally have
a light stress on their first syllable. This stress pattern will be assumed in the examples in the
following tables:
NEGATIVE PREFIXES
REVERSATIVE PREFIXES
PREFIXES MEANING ADDED TO: EXAMPLES
UN- 'To reverse action' Verbs Untie Unhorse
'To deprive of'
DE- 'To reverse action' Verbs Defrost
Abstract nouns Deforestation
DIS- (as for un-) Verbs Disconnect
Participles Discoloured
Nouns Discontent
OTHER PREFIXES
PREFIXES MEANING EXAMPLES
AUTO- 'Self' Autobiography
NEO- 'New, revived' Neo-gothic
PAN- 'All, world-wide' Pan-African
PROTO- 'First, original' Prototype
SEMI- 'Half' Semicircle
VICE- 'Deputy' Vice-president
3.2 SUFFIXATION
Unlike prefixes, suffixes frequently alter the word-class of the base; for example, the
adjective happy is changed into an abstract noun by adding the suffix -ness:
happy -> happiness.
1. Noun suffixes
3.3 Compounding
As Quirk states, a compound is a unit consisting of two or more bases. There is no one
formal criterion that can be used for a general definition of compounds in English. Most
authors used to talk about three different criteria when dealing with compounds:
• Orthographic criteria: according to this criteria compounds may be:
a) Solid: bedroom
b) Hyphenated: tax-free
c) Open: Reading material
• Phonological criteria: Compounds can often be identified as having a main stress on the
first element and a secondary stress on the second element. Hence, "blackbird" and "black
bird" have a different stress pattern.
• Semantic criteria: Compounds can be seen to be isolated from ordinary syntactic
constructions by having a meaning which may be related to, but cannot simply be inferred
from the meaning of its elements. For example, "darkroom" or "greenhouse": "a darkroom"
(a room used for photographic processing) is not just "a dark room" since most dark rooms
are not darkrooms.
The normal way of classifying compounds is by the function they play in the sentence as
nouns, verbs, adjectives, etc. Thus the following taxonomy:
A. Compound Nouns
a) Noun + Noun:
The compound nouns consisting of two nouns is the largest subgrouping of
compounds. Examples: tea table, teapot, card-room.
b) Adjective + Noun: Examples: Fast-food, good-bye.
c) Particle + Noun Examples: over-kill
d) Verb + Particle:
Compound nouns may be countable, uncountable, singular or plural; according to this, they
can be grouped as follows:
a) Common countable compound nouns: bank account, high school, post office, car park,
letter box, pen-friend.
b) Common uncountable compound nouns: birth control, make up, income tax, fast-food,
remote control, social security.
c) Common singular compound nouns: Cost of living, human race, mother-tongue.
d) Common plural compound nouns: Armed forces, human rights, yellow pages, winter
sports.
B. Compound Adjectives
Compound adjectives are made up of two or more words, usually written with hyphens
between them.
The forming of compound adjectives is a productive feature in English. Compound
adjectives are formed according to a large number of different patterns; the most common
and least restricted patterns for forming compound adjectives are:
a) Adjective or number + noun + "-ed": e.g. "red-haired".
b) Adjective or adverb + past participle: e.g. "low-paid".
c) Adjective, adverb or noun + present participle: e.g. "good-looking".
Some less common and more restricted patterns for forming compound adjectives are:
a) Noun + past participle: e.g. "wind-blown".
b) Noun + adjective: e.g. "duty free".
c) Adjective + noun: e.g. "deep-sea".
d) Past participle + adverb: e.g. "run-down".
e) Number + singular count noun: e.g. "five-page".
A few compound adjectives are made up of more than two words and they are often written
with hyphens when they are used in front of nouns and without hyphens when they are
used as the complement of a link verb: e.g. "It was a free-and-easy relationship", "That book
is out of date".
Some compound adjectives are borrowed from foreign languages, especially from French
and Latin. For example: "He was left hors de combat".
Next, we shall outline some groups of compound adjectives:
C. Compound Verbs
Most compounds verbs are written with a hyphen, but some compounds verbs can be
written with a space between the words, and some as single words. The patterns for forming
compounds verbs are:
- Noun + Verb: e.g. "sky-dive".
- Verb + Noun: e.g. "shun-pike".
- Verb + Verb: e.g. "free-dry".
- Adjective + Verb: e.g. "double-book".
- Participle + Verb: e.g. "overbook".
These are the groups of compound verbs:
a) Intrasitive compound verbs: baby-sit, ice-skate, water-sky, hitch-hike, roller-skate.
b) Transitive compound verbs: dry-clean, tape record, ill-treat, spoon-feed.
c) Compound verbs used in transitive or intransitive clauses: bottle feed, short-circuit, tie-
dye, sight-read, mass-produce.
4. CONCLUSION
Word-formation has proved to be a useful device to enrich the English language, whether it
be by prefixation, suffixation or compounding. Yet, the productiveness of word-formation is
rather limited in that not all words that result from the application of the rule are
acceptable, as opposed to what happens with syntax.
Apart from the most recurrent devices (prefixation and suffixation), we have also pointed
out others which also result efficient, such as conversion, back-formation, clipping, blends...
All in all, it could be stated that word-formation is a useful device that enables students to
overcome communication problems, for they will be able to infer the meaning of most
words by the affixes attached to the base.
5. BIBLIOGRAPHY
Bauer, L. English Word-Formation. CUP, 1989.
Leech, G. and Jan Svartvik. A Communicative Grammar of English. London: Longman, 1975.
Quirk, R. and S. Greenbaum. A University Grammar of English. London: Longman,
1979.