function setup() { createCanvas(800, 600); background( white") ; noLoop() 5 3 function draw() { stroke('red'); strokeWei ght (2); holocrux(400, 300, 300); } / holocrux function takes location (x,y) and size s function holocrux(x, y, s) { // ensure size s is more than zero if (s> 0) { /] a holocrux of size s is a circle at (x,y) ellipse(x, y, 5 / and a holocrux of size (s - 100) either side of the circle holocrux(x + (s/2), y, s - 100); holocrux(x - (s/2), y, 5 - 100); + And the result -309-That worked. But was it worth all that effort of defining this pattern, this holocrux, in such an obtuse way? After all, we could easily have just drawn seven circles. Let's see why it is worth the effort. The size of the holocrux is reduced by 100 every time it is called from holocrux(). Let's make it go down in smaller steps, say 30. So the calls to holocrux() inside the definition of holocrux() are changed as follows. / and a holocrux of smaller size either side holocrux(x + (s/2), y, $ ~ 38); holocrux(x - (s/2), y, S$ - 30); That should result in more circles being drawn, so let's change the stroke to be a translucent red with stroke(255, 0, 0, 50). Here's the resull