Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Product Cost Determination is one of the most important business activities since it has a direct impact on the revenue
generation of a firm. Product cost is used in pricing decision – determining the proper price on which to sell the product/s to
customers. Product cost determination is specifically designated as an accounting function. It is one of the primary uses of the cost
accounting system. However, its great impact on the overall well-being of the firm makes it a major concern for all managers.
Normally, product cost includes all manufacturing costs and excludes non-manufacturing costs such as research and development,
selling and administrative costs. Two of the most important cost concepts and classifications relevant to product costing are:
Cost According to Nature/Function Cost According to TRACEABILITY to Cost Object
A. Product B. Department
Direct materials P xx Direct Direct
Direct labor xx Direct Direct
Factory Overhead xx Indirect Direct/indirect
Total Product Costs Pxx Direct/indirect Direct/indirect
Gen. Administrative Costs xx
Selling Costs xx
Total Costs Pxx
Pricing decision can be based on product costs or total costs. In any instance, the problem lies on allocation of indirect costs, in case
the company manufactures more than 1 product.
COSTING Systems
1. TRADITIONAL (VOLUME based/ FUNCTIONAL Based) Costing - allocates indirect costs (factory overhead) based on only 1 cost
driver: the volume of operations or unit level of activity, which can either be:
A. INPUT factor of production – direct labor hours, machine hours, etc…
B. OUTPUT factor of production – units produced
Plant wide and Departmental Rates using unit-level drivers may not assign overhead costs accurately if:
A. the proportion of nonunit-level overhead costs to total overhead costs is large
B. the degree of product diversity is great
PRODUCT DIVERSITY occurs when products consume overhead activities in different proportions, because the products differ in
size, complexity, batch size and required set up time, among others. CONSUMPTION RATIO is the proportion of each activity
consumed by a product
Thus, allocation of indirect (overhead) costs using Traditional Costing approach leads to PEANUT BUTTER COSTING (broad
averaging) because the indirect costs are uniformly assigned or spread to the products, when in fact, the individual products use
those resources in a non-uniform way. Such allocation is very general because it does not consider other factors or variables that
caused the creation of indirect costs.
Inaccuracy of indirect costs allocation leads to CROSS SUBSIDIZATION – a condition in which wrong costing of one product causes
the wrong costing of the other products. Naturally, since indirect costs are allocated based on volume of operations, high volume
product lines will be overcosted ( ) and low volume product lines will be undercosted. ( )
Distorted product costs can be a problem in extremely competitive environments. The series of effects of traditional costing is
shown below:
LOW Volume Product HIGH Volume Product
Indirect cost allocation
Product cost
Sales Price
Market share (Total Sales)
Profit
2. ACTIVITY BASED Costing (ABC) System is a system that focuses on various activities performed and collects costs on the basis of
the underlying nature and extent of those activities. ABC system approaches costs from the perspective that products do not
cause costs; they require activities, and the activities themselves are the causes of all costs incurred.
ABC system traces overhead costs to activities, and then traces costs to products. This method better provides managers with
cost information for product pricing, cost control and planning, and other purposes.
ABC focuses on attaching costs to products (goods/services) based on the activities performed to produce, perform, distribute or
support those products. Hence, it allocates indirect costs based on multiple activities called as cost drivers. Cost drivers (activity
measures) are activities which cause or generate cost. Since it drives the cost, it serves as the allocation base in an ABC system.
1
AE 313 AB COSTING AND AB MANAGEMENT
Prepared by: Joseph R. Mendoza CPA, MBA
3. DIVERSITY of operations – as the company increases the variety of product it offers, cost will increase even if total output
remains constant.
ACTIVITY COST POOL (ACTIVITY CENTER) – a bucket in which costs are accumulated that relate to single activity
measure in the ABC system. It is part of the production process for which management wants a separate reporting of the cost
activity involved. It can be related to the following level of activities.
1. UNIT level – performed each time a unit is produced.
2. BATCH level – performed each time a batch of goods is handled or processed.
3. PRODUCT level – performed as needed to support the production of each type of product.
4. PLANT (FACILITY/ORGANIZATION SUSTAINING) level – sustain a facility’s general manufacturing process.
3. PRODUCT level Product testing, parts inventory mgmt. No. of tests, testing hours
Product design Design hours, design changes
ALLOCATION PROCESS
ABC system is normally a two-stage process of assigning indirect costs to products.
Stage 1: Establish the activity-cost pools and identify the activity in which the cost is most clearly related to.
Stage 2. Assign each cost to products based on their relative use or consumption of activity.
Indirect Costs reclassify Activity relate to Activity measures = Cost Allocation – based on consumption of activity
based on (Cost Pools) (cost drivers)
A brief comparison on cost allocation under the 2 costing approaches are as follows:
TRADITIONAL Costing Activity Based Costing (ABC)
First stage: traces costs to plant or department traces costs to activities
Second stage assigns costs to products assigns costs to products
Cost tracing usually allocation-intensive emphasizes direct tracing and driver tracing
Activity (cos drivers) unit-level unit-level and nonunit-level
RELATED TERMS
ACTIVITY Rate = Total Cost in the Cost Pool . CONSUMPTION Rate = Activity level of a product in the cost pool
Total activity level in the cost pool Total activity level in the cost pool
Thus, the 2 step allocation process of indirect costs under ABC for each cost pool can be viewed as follows:
Step 1 Activity Rate
Step 2 Activity Rate x Activity level of each product in the cost pool
Total Cost in the Cost Pool . x Activity level of a product in the cost pool
Total activity level in the cost pool
Alternatively, it can also be computed as: Total Cost in the cost pool x Consumption rate.
Total Cost in the Cost Pool Activity level of a product in the cost pool
Total activity level in the cost pool
ILLUSTRATIVE PROBLEM 1
JODI Company manufactures and sells different kinds of products. Data gathered from its records are as follows:
Factory overhead: P2,316,000 Total productions = 200, 000 units
Product A Product B Product C
Material cost/unit P40 P30 P20
Direct labor/hour P37.50 P34.50 P31.25
Direct labor hours/unit 1.75 1.25 .9
Units produced 12, 000 8, 000 180, 000
2
AE 313 AB COSTING AND AB MANAGEMENT
Prepared by: Joseph R. Mendoza CPA, MBA
Upon further study, the factory overhead (FOH) is traced and assigned to the following activities:
Cost Drivers Total Cost Total No. Product A Product B Product C
Set ups P1,428,000 714 300 360 54
Baking 800,000 800 hrs 120 100 580
Customer orders 88,000 176 60 80 36
Total P2,316,000
REQUIRED:
1. FOH allocation for each product using the Traditional Costing and ABC system.
2. Cost per unit of each product using the Traditional Costing and ABC system.
3. Amount of cross subsidy for each product.
SUGGESTED ANSWERS:
Requirement #1:
TRADITIONAL Costing System
Product A Product B Product C Total
Units Produced 12,000 8,000 180,000 200,000
Labor hours/unit 1.75 1.25 .90
Total labor hours 21,000 10,000 162,000 193,000
FOH/hr (P2,316,000/193,000) P12 P12 P12
FOH Allocation P252,000 P120,000 P1,944,000 P2,316,000
Units Produced 12, 000 8, 000 180, 000
FOH allocation/unit P21.00 P15.00 P10.80
Requirement #2
TRADITIONAL COSTING System
Product A Product B Product C
Direct Materials P40.000 P30.000 P20.000
Direct Labor 65.625 43.125 28.125
Factory OH 21.000 15.000 10.800
Product cost/unit P126.625 P88.125 P58.925
NOTE:
Using the premise that ABC is the correct (more accurate) costing system, the costs for low volume products (A and B) using
Traditional (Volume Based) Costing are understated and the costs of high volume product C is overstated. This is because under
Traditional Costing, all overhead costs are allocated based on only 1 cost driver: the volume of operations or unit level of activity,
3
AE 313 AB COSTING AND AB MANAGEMENT
Prepared by: Joseph R. Mendoza CPA, MBA
ILLUSTRATIVE PROBLEM 2
Kaseph Inc. manufactures two kinds of products, ordinary named Faith and special named Love. Last year, it produced 47,000 units
of FAITH and 2, 000 units of LOVE, incurring a total overhead cost of P1,010,000. Kandi, the manager, was able to gather the
following related data:
Faith Love Total
Direct Materials P470,000 P 40,000 Unit level costs P 250,000
Direct labor (DL) P940,000 P 60,000 Batch level costs 400,000
DL hrs./ unit 1 1.5 Product level costs 360,000
Set up hours 60 40 Total overhead costs P1,010,000
Design hours 24 36
Purchase orders 50 25
Upon further investigation, it was found out that 80% of the batch level costs is due to the machine set ups made during the
production process. Under its former costing, all overhead costs are allocated to products based on direct labor hours.
REQUIRED:
1. Cost per unit of product faith and love under traditional costing and ABC system.
2. Amount of cross subsidy for each product.
SUGGESTED ANSWERS
Requirement #1:
TRADITIONAL Costing System
FAITH LOVE Total
Units Produced 47,000 2,000 49,000
Labor hours/unit 1 1.50
Total labor hours 47,000 3,000 50,000
FOH/hr (P1,010,000/50,000) P20.20 P20.20
FOH Allocation P949,400 P60,600 P1,010,000
Units Produced 47,000 2,000
FOH allocation/unit P20.20 P30.30
Direct Materials 10.00 P20.00
Direct Labor 20.00 30.00
Product cost/unit P50.20 P80.30
Requirement #2
FAITH LOVE
Cost/Unit – Traditional Costing P50.20 P80.30
Cost/Unit – ABC System 43.28 P242.83
Cross Subsidy/unit Over (under) stated P6.92 (P162.53)
NOTE:
Again, using the premise that ABC is the correct (more accurate) costing system, the costs for low volume products (LOVE) using
Traditional (Volume Based) Costing are understated and the costs of high volume product (FAITH) is overstated. This is because
under Traditional Costing, all overhead costs are allocated based on only 1 cost driver: the volume of operations or unit activity level,
4
AE 313 AB COSTING AND AB MANAGEMENT
Prepared by: Joseph R. Mendoza CPA, MBA
Cost Assignment
5
AE 313 AB COSTING AND AB MANAGEMENT
Prepared by: Joseph R. Mendoza CPA, MBA
4. ABC in itself, does not promote total quality management (TQM) and continuous improvement. However, ABC and its related
management techniques can be implemented in conjunction with TQM, JIT and other techniques.
5. Pay-offs (benefits) from implementing ABC may not be immediate.
ADVANTAGES of ABC
1. Identify and monitor significant costs of technology and advertising, and assess their impact on performance.
2. Trace technology costs directly to products
3. Identify the activities that cause or drive costs. Management can make quality decisions by knowing the nature of each activity.
4. More accurate allocation of costs to various products leads to better pricing policy and Increased market share.
5. More accurate cost information helps the management to adapt productivity improvement approaches like TQM, business
process reengineering and others.
6. ABC can be used to measure the profitability of different product lines and or customer types.
7. Analyze the performance of activities, and the related problems, across business functions.
8. Helps the management to focus on value adding and eliminate non-value adding activities to reduce costs. Thus, management
becomes better stewards of organizational resources.
9. Promotes standards of excellence
2. NON VALUE ADDING activities – are all activities other than those that are absolutely essential to remain in business. These
activities that do not make the product more valuable to the customer. It may be a necessary activity like moving materials
from/to stockroom or workstation and inspecting the quality of finished product. This activity is subject to continuous evaluation
and improvement. NVA can also be an unnecessary like wait or queue time, which needs to be reduced, if not eliminated.
Non-value-added costs are costs caused by either non-value-added activities, or the inefficient performance of value-added
activities.
Inefficiency costs can be viewed as excess (extra or unnecessary) costs incurred by not conforming to the standard level
of performing a value adding activity.
6
AE 313 AB COSTING AND AB MANAGEMENT
Prepared by: Joseph R. Mendoza CPA, MBA
4. Activity SHARING—increasing the efficiency of activities by using economies of scale. An example is designing a product
to use components already used in other products. By using existing components, activities associated with these
components, such as design and machine tooling, are not duplicated.
BUSINESS VALUE ADDED ACTIVITY is an activity that is necessary for the operation of a firm but for which a customer would not
want to pay. A PROCESS MAP is a detailed flowchart that indicates every step that goes into making a product or providing a service.
A VALUE CHART is a visual representation that identifies the stages and the time spent in those stages from the beginning to the end
of a process.
The entire processing time of a firm is usually composed of four types, namely:
1. Processing time – the actual time it takes to perform the functions necessary to produce a product.
2. Inspection time – the time taken to perform quality control activities.
3. Transfer (moving) time – the time consumed in moving parts or products from one place to another.
4. Idle (Queue) Time – time spent in storing inventory or waiting at a production operation for processing.
Only the first one is value added time, the rest are non-value added time.
The 3 steps (components) above determine WHAT activities are being done, WHY they are being done, and HOW well they are
done. Understanding the root causes of activities provides the opportunities to manage activities so that costs can be reduced.
B. APPRAISAL costs – costs incurred in activities to determine whether products and services are conforming to requirements or
customer needs. The main objective is to prevent nonconforming goods from being shipped to customers.
7
AE 313 AB COSTING AND AB MANAGEMENT
Prepared by: Joseph R. Mendoza CPA, MBA
Examples: inspection/testing of incoming materials, maintenance of test equipment, process control monitoring, packaging
inspection; supervising appraisal activities; process acceptance (sampling goods in process to see if the process is in control
and producing non-defective goods) product acceptance (sampling finished goods to determine if the finished goods meet an
acceptable quality level); outside endorsements.
2. FAILURE activities—activities performed by an organization or its customers in response to poor quality (poor quality does exist)
FAILURE (NON CONFORMANCE) costs are the costs of performing failure activities because defects are produced despite efforts
to prevent it. It is divided into:
C. INTERNAL failure costs are incurred because products or services do not meet requirements and the defect is discovered
before the external sale. Examples: cost of scrap, spoilage, rework costs, downtime caused by quality problems, disposal of
defective products; re-inspection; retesting; design changes.
D. EXTERNAL failure costs are incurred because products fail to meet requirements after delivery to customers.
Examples include: repair costs; warranty claims, recall costs, product liability lawsuits, lost sales because of poor product
performance; returns and allowances because of poor quality; customer dissatisfaction; lost market share