Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2019 Magic Notes On Rem Part 2

    Uploaded by

    AlexPamintuanAbitan
    18 views24 pages

    Original Title

    2019 Magic Notes on Rem Part 2

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    18 views24 pages

    2019 Magic Notes On Rem Part 2

    Uploaded by

    AlexPamintuanAbitan

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 24
    Since such proceedings are aka “on, “est”“superfuous and unnecessary” [Perera v. Court of Appeals GR No 01147 June 20, 1989. 174 SCRA 154, 199-160) resort dca admumsitton oases aig ar Section Rule 7 # appears to ive become he earepton rater tha the rule Cases subuegoot to Rodger emprosed hat “Twlhoreparaton ts possible, ether nr eat oto, the esate should tt be burdened wth an admiration proceeding wthnusgod an compeling reasons" sus Duo Bt Ru Das Dua, Gt No. 10¥URS, October 2, DIT Jeter fh ia : Pee Probate court cannot deck issue of ownership a a general ral exceptions. Tunspradene teaches tht furadton a he a curt an ttesate curt special and hd a rates ony to matter having to do wath he rate ofthe wllandfo elemento theta ease persons bu ae ot "exten tothe determination of gatos of owberhi tht ons ring te proceedings This se wheter oot the ropery alleged to eng to te estate (Ongmgc, ee Tan, es and Bay, 97 Phi 30,354 (1988) ag ted in Farle, GR No. 16975 fre 172015 TORSERA 89.648), “he davrne that" spec proceeding fr the probate of wi the guest of ownership 1 an etrancous Imatieewhch the probate out cna ese wh aly” apes wh egal fre fo an teat preceding (Schez ‘Court Appesis SPI 155, 179(1997)) Thus TAY prbate court or one th charge of gracctngs whether teste or itesatecamet agndvate or devrmuns ile f0 properties cared tobe 3 pare ote eate ad which re chimed to ‘tong to ents pres Al thet the sd curt could do a ears nd prope to determine wheter hey shou or shoul! ot be nuded nthe ventory ort of properties to be amare, by the asmitrator. there not ite wel and god, but there then the pars, the dmnisator and th opposing partes het eset oan ordinary actin fr il determination of the conficung cms tle crse the probate cout can oso (Orem Cou of Appts, 237 Phi 98,108 (1987) gc Reyes ea GR No- 213192 fly 12,2017 Peat) Power of probate cout to declde ownership merely an exception. "xception ven the prob arms of am stat ours ite equally importa wo gonsider the call of {he exerie fs power afadudationespecly so when the case clothe une Ow Wie te maybe true thatthe Rognal Teal Court (ow sncadag the MTCD acting 9 2 restricted capac and oercsng ated yrsdicion a probate cou competent fo sue orders Invojng indusion or excunon a crtain properties a the nventery ofthe esate a the decedent nd te adhe ibe, provstnal the question ole oer proprio less ru at such authority ‘onferred pon by iw ane reinforced by oneprieney, shoul eens fuictousy, wh Cue regard fd caution the peel reumstancn ofeach sida case (Liv Cour Appeals, 380 Pi 8, 74.75 2000} n Re intestat state of yaaa Rodrigues Rolando Rosey, GR No. 250408, Famaaey 31,2018, T jp Rule 75 - PRODUCTION OF WILL ALLOWANCE OF WILL NECESSARY Wal excated abroad bye foreign may be admiced to probote nthe Philippines ‘Our le do at pranint he probate a wil created by ener ded although the same have nat as yet teen probated a sllomed in the countres of their exsstion A foreign wil can be given kg ects oar ‘hmxdtion. Arle 81 of te Ci Cde sates hat the il of am aie whos abrass produces cect ee Pippa ade im accordance with the formalities preset by the Law of we place whare be restos, of car 1b the formalities erved sis oust ‘Stcton Role 7 o the 197 Ries Coal Procedure provides tat te aacedent san ehabuant of foreign country the RTC the prone whee be hag anette may tae cognizance oe settlement of uch estate Sections 1 ‘snd? of le 76 further sae that the executor eye. oleate named in the wil or anyother person nterested it the ‘stat may at anytime ater the death ofthe telat, petton the court having jusdicton ta have thew alowed, ‘eter the sane hein hs pssesson ar wo, oF lst or destroyed (ht Re: Paap v. Pliganas, GR No. 169188, Tanuary 26,2011 Probete of wi ‘he ew enjoins the probts of 2 wlan the public request because uniess a wil is probated and notice ‘thereon to ths woe wai, righ operon Ys epse os prepay by wl maybe rendered mgatry The Suthenaton a wil decd other ivesion th sch as tou up the eapactyof he ester an he compliance ‘vith those requirements or slematics whieh the iw presets ar the valu a wil (Ua Bako he Ps ‘Sinton ota. GA No 14982 February 23,2008 (alee) Rule 78-LEFTERS TESTAMENTARY AND OF ADMINISTRATION, WHEN AND TO WHOM ISSUED Preference ithe appointment of te admlstrair of he estate of decedent In the mater of appointment of adnunstrator ofthe esate ofthe decease, the surviving spause 1s preter ver thet ot knot decedent [Se 6 [b) Rule 1 Rules of Cour) When the aw speak of-net the Feterenc sto thove who aeenled, ude the statute otro, tothe decederts propery, Vena vo Venta, 16OSCKA 810) one mbose relationship sich that he elite to share inthe extae ae arrbute, [Tavera EL ogat Fipino nc, 98 Pi 481, shor. an be. th resoivang threo, te ws of whether a aplcnt fr kters of ‘amination. nest fk ora ir ofthe decedent. the probate court perforce hs to dtu and pas pen the ise of ten A separate aon wil ply esl a mip sts Angus ws Angeles Magy, GA. No 183798, September 22005 Up A, a GI No, 167979, Mare 1, 2005} Onder of preference not absolute. svell~sted to probate cour cannot arbitrary ad without scien ean regan the referential rights ofthe surviving spose to the administration of teeta ofthe deceased spouse. But the person enjoying sich 2 ABKC20;9 Maple Aras in eed awe ogra combned REVISED consohatJEDET na /EVSA/ ys proferetl rights s unstable the court may appoint another person. The determinaton fa person's suai or the fice of admunstrtor rests, os ret exten nthe sound agent ofthe curt encresing te power of appointment and ‘ich jadgment wl nace itrtred vith on appeal unless appear afrmativly ta the cour elo was OF Unsutaberese may consist in adverse ares of some kno sty to those nmmedistly interested i the state (Soca Gara, 4 Ph TUL Saver, Sr CA, 4 Pl 180 Uy vs.CAet Git No, 197979 Mars 36,2006) Reason why survsing spouse ls preferred inthe appotntment of aminstrotor ot absolute. Te because the surviving spouse ts at only partner inthe cong partersbp but also a her ofthe occas (Gurman vs Linco 68 PR 673) “The preference is not sso thee ate strong reasons justiying the sppointment of persons ater tha the surviving spouse or W there anther person having mre heres han the survieng spouse (Guzman vs Linco: Supra}. Thus the contestants fr admnstraton ae the second wie and chien ofthe Rt mariage, the ter would Speer where the propert tobe adminstrs war wl aequre dicing th ist marae (xmas neo Rule 6 CLAIMS AGAINST ESTATE lis chat may be fed against the estate ofthe decedent “They ae (2) Al clans or money agama the decode, ansing om contrat, expresso impli, whether hesame be fue, not dae or ontingstt (0) Allcums to funeral expenses {Expenses forthe lax sess ofthe decedent and {e} Judgments formoney against the decedent (Se 5) - Claims agains the estate. Aft is death the em oth creditor st le ts mony lm with he probate eoit i accordance with Sc 5. Rale 86, Rules of Cour The tila mney dat agains the devedents exate i the probate cours mandatory (De Sautsta vs De Guzman, 125 SRA 675 (1983) As eld Inthe vantage case of Py Eng Chong vs errera, 70 SCRA 130 (1976), s wos sad tha this rqusrement fr the purpose of protecting the estate ofthe deeased by informing the executor or administrator ofthe claims agaist which wl thus enable i to examine each cai and to determine Whether is 3 peeper one which should bellowed The lan and cbvius design ofthe rues the speedy settlement of ‘he ars a he deceased and the earydevery af he property to the dseabulces, gates or es. The aw tty quires the pra presentational dsposton othe das gas the eceden'sestate order to sete the aff of {estate as ncn as possible pay of ts debts and state the read (Py Eng Chong vs: Herer, 70 SCRA 130 (1975) Taso iets lim, can ont go arth co - mk ofthe promissory note subject o defenses by such co maker (Union Bank ofthe Ps vs Sanaa et al Gi No. 149926, February 28,2005 (Cal). Remedies of tne morigogee in cas of cath of the mortgagor. “They ae 1)” He may abandon the securty and proce ila the testat or tsate proceeding and share inthe fenorldistbation ofthe arate ofthe esate or (2 _Hermay foreclose the morgage and reaie upon Ms sean, by ation in cour. raking te eneeacr oF siiminstrator a dlendant ana thre Iss fagment forthe deiency ar the tae, Ne may elim the etetengor (3) He may tly on his morgige or eter securtyslone and foreclose the same (Se. 7: News ofthe Late Magasong tal Mana Banka Cop, GR No, 171206 September 23, 2013) Contingent latins con be fled ven if Cu clans may be inchoate interests they are, however abe interests. The Rules allow not just «rodnors, but any porn iterated or persons itreted sh the esate nvarous cactus te prac thar respective ‘interest nthe ete Anybody with» contingent cam based on 2 pending acon for quast—del agaist a decedent ‘nay be resaonahiy concerned tat by the me fudgment 5 rendered he aor the estate of the decedent woul have “ready boop isrted a nnibed to the eatont that he udement could o anger e eared against Whe the ile da tallow the rghttorntarvene thay may be alowed to sek certain payer or rei rom the itestate cart at ‘explily provided for under tw Rules the prayer or rele! sought s necessary to poet thet interest in the estat, at thre tothe modality wader the Russ by which sch meres can be potted (Hibdo, eA ¥. CA, 3 GR NO. 168108, Mays, 2009), ‘aim of buldern good fat Rela for ceeary expenses by 2 posessr of 4 pace of anda kind of quascoatrat enc, shouldbe fed a he estate proceengs ‘hing Leung enw Ore, was expsines thatthe tem pled cowtacs” as used in our remedial aw, onganated frm the common law were blgatens derived from quasconrats 9d from aware bah consired 35 Implied contracts Thus the form qussi-contac ts acluded nthe concept implied contracts” ax used the Rules of Court cording pits of te deceased ari ry quis contracts shold be leds lms nthe setementofas ‘eat as provid secon 5, fle Bo ofthe Kus of Court (Metepoltin ane & Trost Co, v. Absolute Management orp No, 170498 fat 92013, Brn ‘ule 87 - ACTIONS BY AND AGAINST EXECUTORS AND ADMINISTRATORS Powers ofthe probate cour over persns in posession of propertes ofthe estate Section 6 of Rule #7 scl to secure evidence frm pasos suspected af having possesion or knowlege ofthe properties le bya daceasd person. oro Rav concealed, embeazed ar conveyed an fhe properties oe decesed 2 jAMRCZOLIMagiAras a Remedi Law segregate) une) REVISED consoled) EDITED/THaE¥SAV)> (Modesto vs. Modesto. eo, 105 P1067; Valera vs Inserta, 149 SCRA533) ‘The curt which acauresjursaicion over the properties of 2 deccosed person through the Ang ofthe orrespoing proxceings has sperision ae contol over thestproperbes. Tho al at has the ren ty te to A thatthe inventory ofthe admistrator hist ll the properties. rigts and eres which tae law requres the "xamnstatrto clude is taventay In compliance with thy te sour aco hs the mort power to detarmine ‘what properties, righ an creas of he decraed admmitrator shoal cde reali he tventry. AR Me OF person terested inthe properties ofadecssed may calthe court's enon that etn properties, rights or eres are eR out rom the sventry such eases kewl the cous duty wo Pea the observa on a ich pay. The ear os the poser to determine wheter © ot sch observations deserve ateaton ad i such properties been pine ae "eesti (Gara vs. Grea, 67 Pa 385; Dolsy vs, Ale, SCRA 215) Remedy i properties are ept by eter persons ‘The tra court has math wdc withthe propel or pera bang tthe eat the verse xsi fer suck etait there gue cane to teheve atthe peson Samia een Properties belonging co the eat the he admmsatrsosl e oary aon cout to reeves the sae {Modesto vs Mods, supra) inkson feta shares of sok by heater inthe entry dos ot Somat deprive the asset shares Ty havea rt be ead nthe qeston fers hn at rope ropery reseed he oat (Maeve in 28 F137) “Third persons to wom the decedent ad Bren oneyed maybe ie to apea in cour and same andr cath 2 to how thei in posession he detent nef Paudent conveyer a separie {on sncessary to eter nse ut (ea YS 8 SCRA BS; Valera srt supra Bey Cha, ‘Aste Manageet Corp Gt No 4B, tbe 162003) ule 102 -MABEAS CORPUS Fanetion of the writ of habeas corpus. The function ofthe spec preceeding of habeas corpus to inure into the lgabty of one's detention. nal petitions for habs oyu, the court must inte tnt every phase id aspect ofthe peters detention fon the moment petitioner as taken to cust up tthe moment the court passes upon the merits ofthe petiOn ond ly ater suchscriiny cam the cout sas sel thatthe due process ase ofthe Constaton tas Been sated. However ‘nce the perso detained daly caged in cot, he may no lnger question is Getetion by apeson fr the sssance of Swnt ef habeos corps: is remedy then athe ial ofthe infermution andor he warrant of ares duly sued. The ‘eaon forthe sane ofthe wrt even Deceres mare unavaing when the person detained ls» bona fr is tesporsty felease (Bermate vs CA.75 SCAD 400, GR Ha 107744, Octahor 1H 1996; Manga. Judge Pangisn, GR. No 150799, Fay 7.2015, Besar [Not necessary that the wrt be elated any offense. “ ‘The nature othe Fstsunt of Mey weed ct be raed to any flee 203 ent 3persoa to the efficient remedy of aes corpus timay bo aval of a5 a post coewction remedy oe wen Ue san alleged violation ofthe ery of abode tn oer wort haces orp efletey substances the pled autonomy of izes contttionly Protected an the right wy Hbcry in Aide I Setban 1 ofthe Constitution, Habeas corpus being 2 remedy for & ‘onsiuonal nigh courts ast apy -conciaions ad deliersie level Of sctiny eo thatthe rubeantive righ C0 Hery wil ot be farther cured the shy of eter processes in ub Provincia! Boot of Mindoro the Proviea Board of Mindoro sued Resolution No. 25, Sens of 1917, ‘The Resolution ordered the Maayan cmv fw t}inaie hla al coped them to permanent) ste in.an oshecare reservation in Tigh, Unt the Reseluton Mangyans who refused to establish tematic the Tao ‘eservation were imprisoned ‘A Wht of Habeas Corpus was ewige Sued in Vacances akan. “Tro exermiante vice” Mayor uso Lukbsn of Mans ordered the brothels in Mand se, The female aes workers previously employe ty these rotele ‘were rounded up and place ship bound for Davg. The women ware expelled rom Mana and deported to 0220 ‘st the legal of his 3, the Court rust tat Mayoe fst LaNan Ugly deprived the worn he Bad ‘deported to Davao of het bry, special of ht pegs o comic. sad that the women, “despte tha Dela {i emse leper of society, ace nevertheless hot cates but Philippine eiiaens protected by the same constitutional {varanties ape ober etn” The wrnen ha the right "to ange thet dome om Masato another loa ( Fe: etn or sas Corp of Dat Markang Slo ¥ Warden QL fall Atte, etal, GA. 197347, Apr, 2015}. Wri ofMabeas Corpus at CIR "The Niooa capa }dicalRoplon consists of the ces of Mana, Quezon, Pasay, Clone and Mandalay and the mumepalties of Nvutax Malsbon, Sam am, Makati, Pasi Pateros, Tol, Marhna, Praag a Pius ‘Mntnupasand Valais mew thre ts ndustable it the hag of ptison forte nance of wr of babeas ‘Corpus bear faily court ay ofthe ets enumerated ror a ngs he wt sought to be eared wan ‘he Magna apt face Repon 2 here Inthe cae at br, respondrt led the peiuon before the fal cout of Caloocan Cay. ince Caloocan iy and ‘Quezon City both belong tote sme jai peplon, the wi sun by the KTC-Calaaxan ca tbe peated In Geecon Gig Whether pettioner reside In the former or the later is materi m view a the above rle (Rules on isto af Minors nd Writ of Habeas Corpus i elation o Custody of Minors (AM, No. 034-04 SC)MIA HAZELINA A ‘TUIANMILITANTE IN BEHALF OF THE MINOR CRISELDA M- CAA w RAQUEL M-CADA-DEAPERA, GR No. 210686, fly 28,2014, Yeuseo,I) Tender age presumption; not conclusive “Poe Convertion on he Rigs ofthe Chil provides that allan concen culsen whether undertaan by buble or private socal wellive sttuions, courts of la, adminstratveautharins or lplatve bodies, the Dest Interest of the cid sa he 3 primary consideration, The Cid and Youth Weare Code he sae way. gual 27 yatc2019 Mag reas in med La (seprepae combine REMISenaodted)EDETED/nl/E¥SA/en8 provides that i ll questions rearing he cae and custody, amory others, a the cil s/he welfare sl be the ‘he socalled tener oe presumpoo unde Article 215 of he Panny Care maybe overcome ony by comping ‘raenco ofthe mets une The mothers dared wntble to ave esta ates chidren mone o reo te following instance neglect absndonment, vaciayimen tmoraty, haba! dninkennse drug s6dcon, ralieatment ofthe cl mst, or afin wh communicable dacs Here, the her was sho to Be tnsstable or rol tape a ong or et mio eh At, no competing reason ha ben add to tench the chido te maths cust Thus the sole cantly over Sanne Nore Heh wae sare othe mother Agnes ‘Gn son (AGNES GAMBOR HIRSCH HON CORY OF APPEAIS et GR Ne 175 ly 12007 VELASCO ‘CORRECTION OF ENTRIES A 9048 applies to correction of lec erors RAN. 9045 the aw appeal person di not le a ptiion or change of mame oF caren ppelion merely carecting the misplingat ha ame by sng fr change rtm Michael to iced She was not tempting to eplace her ert opellton She was merely corecting the misspeling of her gen ame “Michele” could easlybe speeds "Mitel expel se the fest ou (4 Cars oF these wo (2) ames are excl the same The erences only pen oun addons eter "i Michael” adi" at the end af “Michelle” “Michele” and Michae may abo be voealedsimlany,considanng the poset of dierent cents orintoatonsofaieent peopl In aay ca, alo di ot sek wy alent apelation. The lower ‘courts have termined that she hs ben kw an Michal al eughaut her hfe She was merely seeking to orect et eco conor tbr te por me (epi s MihleSn GG No. 270 may 7 208 ule 108 does no apply ns case ether, "RA S048 removed he corre of lero typographil errs rom be scope of ae 108, ab dispensed yt he need fer ute prcceings in case an lve typographical mistakes nthe ev retro changes of frst ame oF mektame. Thereore, ste cil rgtar who has pms freien over Calls petton a0 he Regional Trl Court Only er petition ws dered y the aly a nunpl el restar en the Regen Tra) Cour take cogncancee er case Republic Sal, GAN, 206023, Ap 3.2017, Pea ‘When Rule 103 the Rates of Cour app substantial corectin:parpse. "person who woul es acton four ner Rae 13 sabe fra substan charge nthe given mame oe sarmame valid reasons ecg ae Rule 108 apples fe corecUans ae ch. ‘Ths requirement fr jie authorization wes ase to proven ful and ally ther parties wo may be fecal th change a ame, opps the mater, adc tn ee proveedgs ind he whl woe (ep. ‘Mercadera 652 Phi 195.205 (200) Pr endo}, ‘plying Article 412 the Ci Code, persan desing chang hi or her name altogether must le 3 pttion lander le 103 Ue Repos Trl Coure whch than fee am afer sting» Baan dese ecg he order’ publationin a newpaper general crclation ABer ing hat tere proper and reasonable aus To ange iso nr nam, the eon Tal Cur may ra the pon and eda se tbe eR Correction of substan changesn cll registry appropriated adversary procediags le 108 of te Rube bf Coon protdee the prcedie for the crrecton of substantial changes ithe ce repstry though a8 apprise adveracy race (See Republic Meradera, 652 Pi 195, 210-211 (2010) An ‘verse proceedings cfincd a om "having opposing pasts contested ss Ssirgusted rom ah ot pare apps, one of whic he pat sckng root hn genoa warning one ater party, od fr ded ter an opportu fo omtest "(Republic ty, 716 Pa 2542612013) "rue ie mandates 2) sts of nate open! oppesors: one pent persons mad inthe ptt, and another gen to aber persone io ae nt marae the pian but nantes may he comscered ited OF “ected parties Consequently, the petison fora substantial orem ot am entry ithe ci eistry shold plead 8 Fespondente the cil rer ax well a hor pron who base or ato hae ony ttre tha would he oft thor | a, the are co strc comply wit the above discussed requiremets of Rue {08 of the Rules of Cour for corti of an entry the repsar involving substantial snd controversial aeatons tenders the eae proceedings tern mls voi Tn Republi CA 323 Pu 64 [1999 the Court hed hat the proceeung fhe ea ‘ourt- were and voi for lock of friction as Ue peionerstherun faed to plead the‘ regan an indispensable pay inthe pation or corecuon of entry (Felipe Amis. Repabl GR Na, 211724 Aust 2,206, Peta aaa CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - JURISDICTION ements ofjardion mimi cases : Tit ecmensot radon mcm ses theory: pen oases The jrltn out cima aes eran by the pay imposbl, a ntby the peal tun pon (sole ago GA Ho. 50,1, 1980) He uy dost ewe Yeas us wah be furcione the MIC mr tan@ year tnt frcon oT "The liv pey fr al dle i ot canter determing which court sl fave taradton oe cnt cba such nguyen ct Publ Se ipa. an fan 9 PL. 7 {isso b129) An cepcon tote rae above He el where the may pron comet ba ts within he Farndon be RT eS NEC). ‘ams commited by pbc cers al wih th arama the Sandigenbyan the grades 2 above feb 27. the or ATCh rsdn 2 YABRCZDTS Mugs Aen Rei Law (rept combined REMISED| con dteJEDITEDina/NSA/S 5 3. Tertanal uraéicton ovr lao crime commesion. incrminal ose venue 2 question of jursacin, However, SC may ree te tran ofthe ven ofl of ssuminal cases in der to tute ams fase (Fe Pople, G18 Ph 120 [2003 Nava. Hon, Mane! de as, GH No. 182905, lune 22,2019) “The abuece of ny ofthese chen may be challenged hy an accused a any sage of the proces inthe ‘ourtbelow or on appeal Fang comply with syne ofthe the reskingfdgment a convaton small and vad enue Is a question of ursavon in cea cass; rule not absolute. ner the aw, esse question of janet crm eaes, Rene: a8 Fue he coma should be ed ‘Mana Sue rate 1s founded om pubbe ple soa mak to andy Hela the prs. But under A BOA the roves that 2 vit of ly ecru hae te pon toe tbe ease spate of restdence orm the place where "Be crime ms contd Ths sa eeeion othe Fle ha venue a question farina eases The ae ‘Sitended to potct the meres of ati fg recruitment (Sane Hoe, Pata Sto. Toms, GR. No. 152642 Nowemee 13,2012) Venue in fobsficatin of prote documents Incase of falsiation of prvatedacunents, the vee the pace where the document is actly flied, to the prea ofr wth he intent to peje a thd person, regarless whether or not the falsfled documents pu 9 the improper a egal use for whit nas mene (0.5 Bare. 36 Phil 208. 207 (1917); Lopes. Para $24 Pl, 1211, 1216 (1966) Navan. Hon Manuel Ade Casto, GR No, 182926, June 22,2016, Perla Herabe, Jurisdiction over bel eases venue “Veneration criminal actions such ht the place where ths crime was commited teres not only the venue ofthe ation bit constttes an ese element of janedctan. Ths prince aqures even greater ttmport in ie cases pen tat Atle 30 othe RPC) as amended by Repub A No 4363], specially proves for shes ents rt ton he cml Ac sya hs (Bon TE Mas 6 Pe 549 2010) 04 “The ruminal ant act for damages in cases of writen defamation as provided for in his ‘hap, shale fed simultaneous o separately wth dhe cart ois instance of he proce actually cesidesatthe Line athe commission ath aliens ‘Thus, generally speaking. “een of ibe cases where the cemplaimant a private mwas med to ony str oft lacs tony 1) where the comainun actualy reside athe time of the comaisson ofthe offense 10" 2} where te lege efamacryartle was pnated and ht publshod (Malayan ns Co eta Pcci etl, GR. NO. 20370, apil 112016, Pera Bera Dejemetory statement at internet TTthecucunstances so wbsre the Ul was printed od fst ube are wed bythe offended party as bss forthe venue ut the cea acon, the Information must lage with arecuaney where the demtry arti was Dated sd fit pbs nencod 9 sported by fara the aes of he tea busines oes fhe ease af newspapers ges or sera ablations Tis precoation becues acesary more to frestl any tnchnatonto horse "The same measre canot be eeaonaiy expected whan t pera to defamatory material appearing on 2 vwehstan the internet a ere woul emo way of ctertnig the sts os printing a ist publican To crete Dremize of equating his fra acest fhe etsmatory ate on petobers ests In ska eh pring and St Puliation wo spawn the very tat he awadmen! wo Arie 360 of Uw AC sought to seuurage and PEER It Rerayrewuaes mach nugiatontosce the chaos tht would ensue in tuations where fhe web's autho or wit. & blogg or anyone who pots tostages therein Eos be sie Tor ibe aayrhore in he Pps atthe Pea complainant ay have logy acest the ofeding wet or the Cour ta had tat he Amended Information sliccatly vested edition nthe courts of Makat simply Ibeouse the defamatory article was secered therein would open te Hoodgtes othe He at beng ke al other Iocatins where he pean webahe te kewneaccesusl of capsbl of being accessed (Malayan Ina ta, etal, GR Ne. 203370 Ape 1, 2016, Peras-ernabe Rule 110 - PROSECUTION OF OFFENSES Testo determine i nfrmation ts insufficient “ecrnding ta Sernon & Rule 10a the 2000 Rules of Couns Procure he complain or sft sufficient states the names of the sccied the destion of theese guren by the statute: the ats oF omissions Camplin of as contin the oflnse, the name ofthe afended party the approcimate date ofthe commieson othe ‘ese: ad the plae whete the ofense a commited The fundamental tesa determining the suiciency oe ‘Simlted. constitute the lements ofthe olens"(enri Monalstoy CR Na Joesl4 Oot 22, 2004, Pople Bae Reyes. The Ombudenish GR NOS. 212595-94, March 15,2016) ‘fect qualifying eecamstances are not alleged ln he information Tan inet for Fie, there wa an altos of reltxship of pee age of acs a the vat bu ere xs ao aleption of minor accused can oly be conic of imple ap; Nat aie ape "The creumstances finery athe ci lhe tons tothe ointr must concur agua the rime of rape (People v Malan, GHUNo. 185716 sopterter 2), 2010, 631 CRA 676, 698), bac ony her teationshp othe "ecued wat alleged and prove. The il court was peice fom consider the atteadance of such quai ot Sets aan ART oscars ot aay ne aes stem | > nner eri 9 ane ‘whch prone that the complaint or snfrmation sal tate the designation ofthe oense gen by the stature, aver the cs of omisions constituting the olen and spec HS qualiying an aggevaingcitamstanes tne 10 degnatin ofthe offense, reference sa be made to the sean o seta the tate paishing The ats oF masons campianed of a astute ese and the quai and agrasaing reumstances must be sate 9 ordinary and cone language ad wt wecesariym the ngsage cd he sat ut crm sult erable 3 person of common understanding to know wat afense ts beg charged aswel ats quaking ad aggravating Suman cut rons gest (Seta an Rls 1, Kes Co Pees Mo 195428 fone 15 2015, rsa Prosecution or hazing, when ther slice 0 allegations. ee ctnent ining cave merely stated that psychological pan an physical injuries were infitd on he ‘victim. Maton to Quish shout be aed bose he itmate fac aged ot consteue te crane aeng The ‘oaictmen merely ttc tat poyehigicl yn ad py ijures were ale the wt. There sw alegston "at the purport acts were employed os a pefequste for admin entry st the organiaation Faure to avee Ws rata myedien would prevew the sacra prowsciton of the rund respanslty of the Acute her 3k Principal or a accompli, for the cme of hazing Plain reference toa tecaal term (US. ¥, li Sam 7 PA 273 (1910 (eed Consign v. Ppl, CK. Nos 175750 51, 2 Ap 2014 People v. Valdes GR No. 175602 18 fury 2012, (963 SCRA 272: Matra. eopt 1 Pi 203 (2009) Sule v. People $33 Pi 36 (2006) Anaya. People supra note 2 Burgos w SB 459 Phil. 74 2003} People . arn. 393 Pale 2000} Oca fence 115 Phi 20 (2962).— ‘ths cae hang ~smsiitent and wcll, ee nt chaacteation a the acs allopedycormited 34 ths mee coneason of iw Section 6, ule 110 the les of Cur expressly tte tht te iformaton must se ter ia, both “he desigaton ofthe otense sven by the stue” adhe aso arson complained ofa constating the ‘lense Peopkev Baya, et al Git No 171222 Pople. Arye al, GI Nor 47h, Fabry 2015, Sereno. ‘Meco screpancis as to time ofecurrence of offense alleged. “The discrepancies ae otune of ocarrengs othe crime of ape done ae the substantial nights of he accuse, ere tho acts gccured within te pesado time aged im bah infrmstion sn afidaet The dllereace i mere, forma rather thin substantial in character (People vs. Lala, 171 SCRA 277} The word “abou” a comprehensi= {erm wich when sed wth reat to ime, may ever 3 considera exon hee People verre, 173 SCRA 258, People vs Paschon GR. Na, 92586, Apri 26,1991} i att ha en 8 that rap aes, he dae st an essential element ofthe rime ana theroor, ne ot be accurately stated, Whats mportt tha the cused ot peced bythe amendint was inferno athe nate fhe care gai in sn oe til ae he defense avaible (ow after the amendment was mate (People vs. Hetil, GR. No. TUNG Septerber 19,198, Zapunta . People, GR. No. 70863, March 20,2015; People Ba, Kk No. 200587, September 23,2018) Dupcoustaformation: nature effet if mo MTO. ‘Asarul thee shou ony ono oes algod mone normaton a dpb of llensesn onc informa s ot allowed by the Rus, However the rqurenen 3 mere procedural ue ab jurisdictional suck that the acused a ‘mn his case didnot objet othe dup a he information he canbe convicted of ae many offenses maybe proven drag the al People v. Dey, GR. No 66939, Aug 1 1998 225 SERA] Purposes ofthe prohibition against allegation of more than one offense nan tnormation, "Theale apa duty offense changed nthe ntarmation tense [@} to give the defondan the necessary kaowedge a th charge to ensle hit popare his dense: Laney ‘CA, GR No. 152688, Febewry 10, 2000, 482 SCRA 194) (0) opreventconusioniahis defense Pepe vx Ferrer Ap 21957); (6) topreventharasmet (Peoples Dan 24 Phi. 71) ule 111 - PROSECUTION OF CRIMINAL ACTION et of death of accused on ci Hai. rami ety totally extingished by the death ofthe accsed (Art 89 (2, RP, People Ani, No 20650, Marc 4, 2018, eras Bernabe) ‘Thus upon aceusetappalas death pending oped! of his conviction, the crit acuon i extrgusbed nash ax there no longer a defenont to stand ay the accused the cv ation sted res fort every a ‘the clay dat sso facto extingushod rounded 35 Ws on cram ation However, te wel to canty ‘at acestd-apellons ei abit a comnetion with ho acts guns he ictrn rye eed aus ater than Sec tm which cae, Ue Vcin ay fle a Separate eel econ agaist the este of accsed-eppllnt. 2 ay Be ‘warcantaby tae 6 posed race (Peoples Layng, GR No. 214875, Ocaber 17,2016, 6 SERA 150, 195-196, Pera ernb, Gh aby despe aqua. The acct acquit for fare ofthe pomecton (9 prove al elements ofthe offense beyond resonable doubt does not cade the extinguishment of his cv hay for the dsbonoredeheks. Desplat the acused tnay stile added coy habe The extinction ofthe peloton docs bt carry wth the extn feel at Where (athe satis bse on reasinshle doubts only preponderance of evidences equ, () tho cour ecares thatthe laity ofthe actse ts only cvik and (e) the el aby f the accused does no arse om or snot based ‘pon the crime of hich the accused was acquit (Han Hyg Pac Eang Won Cho, $15 SCRA 02 (2007), In number of snares i wos hela ht an sega hased on essoabledoult das not preclude the award fc dlamages (Gx v. People, GR. Na. 148060, September 5, 2007, 582 SCRA 204, Domangsang v.CA. GAL Na. 139992, December 5, 2000, 347 SERA alfsrez, eople, etal, GR No. 12301, ansary 31,2011) _oAWK2019Mape Area tn Rene Lv (sepepteombie REVISED consented) EDITED final ESAs iolation of P22; accused acquit can sl be eld cl able cl deemed fled. "Wan accused was changed wth walionof BP22 bat he was aque he canbe elt vty ab In BP 22.3805 ‘he acon far the correspoing civ obligation ts deine ised withthe ermal ction Tho criminal ation for ‘wolaton a 22 neceysy ies he corresponding evi ao ad eservatin to ie sucht acon seat ly sale alla or recognized (Supecne Court Cul 57 97 efecto 1 November 1997; Eval Sree I, (GH Ma 211504, Move 28,2017). Affect of death of accused while the cave was pending appeal ‘ly the ir iy arising rom ad bse sey on the offense commyted extinguished. Te can fr ct labtty pried ona sures ete tan the ene su a those asin roms av, contacts qubs contract, td qa eis survives. Fr this reason the has ofthe siti may ie a separate ev oto agains the estate ofthe aeciseé io ded as may be warrant by law and procedural ules. The hats need at ear a orfeture of the rp to He this Separate cil action by preserigeon because withthe vsti of the emia case together withthe ci Uabty sing ftom the crime the state ofan deems ierrped With the extinguish te ermal e wl a abies eed ou the rie the ruminal ase tse and wt the appeal eh shou be dams Tie heeae it the appeal hts dismissed mach dss would Be ‘cecvel afrming te tral out’ deson fing the accused cna and evil able But isthe ermal ase ‘se that esse te lower court's decsion ting the assed gully and sentencing hi fo echistonperpetua at tw itemty the hes othe deceased becomes petecual (People vs Abutgan Gt No. 136843, September 28, 2000, Domingo Coins i. No. 180785, ne 17,2013; People. Ando, March 14,201, Pris Bernabe.) ‘lomens of prejudicial question ‘Theelements ofa fread! question ae the flowing 2) The prenousiy nsuted ei actin voles an sue sor timate elateé tothe sue raised inthe subsequent crm acon ane ) The rslaton of such sue determines whether or net the emul action may. proce (Sec. 7, ps. ‘Gciano SMC, GR No. LETH, July 24 2043; Domingo oa Sigs cab No. 208287, March 15, min, ‘ec igamy fed obcoa of ation for mt of mariage The sbsequcnt lingo the ca acon or multy fs nt a pred queston (Hobs vs. bis, GR. No. 138509, sy 31,2000) ‘A prejucl question sone whch arse 3 case the reslition of which i lala antecedent of the ise tnvolved therein (Forth Geran vCal, 19 SCRA 02; Zapata ve Montesa, 14 PBL; Merced vs Diaz, 109 Pl (299); People ws Arapon, 94 Ph 57, eed n aches ve. adge Apt, 2000) es 2 question based on a fet ‘isanc ant separate fom the cime itso murately connected wth that tres the lt or tnacence of he $cuse (Yap vs Paras 205 SCA 625), ft must appear ol ol tha he cv ase involves ots spon wich the emia con chat, baa that te eseltion o eh sues Fased ithe et achon would nocessary be deermunative ote ‘Tuminal ase (as vs Ras 100 SCRA 125 enter ve Concepon, 2 SCRA 178: De Lon vk Matis 70 Phi 202) “The defense mast involve an sue sia o sty elated othe same te asd Ue ermal action and ‘slut is determinative f whether hater ay pace oo (tap ve Par, 208 SCRA 65; Poole Cin Ie {GRC No. 146198, anuary 16,2003; Zuzucregav Mo Jose Vilas, eta, CR No. 193708, Apel 5. 2010 Reyes Ross, GR No, 159823, Febranry 18,2015, Beran, San Miguel Proprbs Inc. ¥ Perez etal, GRE ND 165836, Sepembr 42015, Bersami I) question "Thee 3 profuse guration i roy dation sceking to ly the doo ae onthe pound hat her parents’ signatares were forged ad cminal ease for falcaton of pub document. etfs ant ase 0 asd Socument The eiotal case cn be suspended onthe ground e rejudicel question A prejudal question sunderstoad Inw toe that wich res ns cavedhe reson ef which top anteceet of heer lee ns send the cognizance of whic pert to apother wbunal The dacriae af preudieal wucstin cones imo pay geealy 2 Situation whete cn and emia atonsare ponding and tho sues sovelved in ba cases are sim © 10 close) elated that an sue mist be preemptive resold inthe cv ce Hor the criminal acon can proceed (Quambaa Hon. Oxon 242 Phi 44, 444 [1908]. The ratoqle behind the principle of prejccal querin to ado contig dessins (Ty de zuseega Mon fue Vilas, el 631 Pal 375,395 [2010], Pr. plca-ivd scion to be coeldared pejutcal to acral cae a to cause the supenson ofthe cial proceeding util the final resolution of thee ese the flonan equstes mus -be present (1) the Gv case volves Facts Suatly vated to tise upon which th emia posection Wousl e based (2) the resolution ofthe ss oF trees rl bt pti ari the pul or nmacence ofthe accused would necestrly be dotrmnedsand(9) reiton tory said quetion mst be lodged ts anther tabunal (Prado Peope etal, 218 Phi $73,877 [1984)) Th allegation In the cl eae based onthe very samo facts which would be necessary determostve of thet ult oF anaeeRee 3 ‘cused inthe cma cae ithe sigrature inthe Absolute Doe of Sa ate genuine, the there would be no ascason an! he Spouses Singson would be nace the lense hired. Other sated, cancion i the criminal as, shoul the allowed Uoproceed ahead, would bea gross injustice and would have tobe Set aside wore lly eed i the ci ease hat {indeed te signatures ofthe seers wore authente(Domingo Sigs, CH No 203287, 207936, Apr 8, 2017 Reyes | Ras Ras 100SCRA 125) Concepeof independent cet acon nat opplieable tn praia! questions twas contended thatthe two 2} cases can proced independently of exch other relying on Seton 3 of Rule 111 ‘ofthe Rules of Court, in ration to Arce 387 of the Ga Cade whieh the Cour et bes misplaced Section 3 Provides hac atiam fr amagr in caer provided under Ales 42,3, 4 and 2176 ove Cr Cdk, whch my sp cansutte cri lenses, may prorcediadependeally ofthe cranial action. In ssnces where a0 depend {3 YAURC2019.aag Areas in ewe La (sey egte{ cond edREVSED|consobiates)EDITED/au/EVSA/O93 ‘ac permite, the esl ofthe crimination, whether of acquit or conviction, is ete eleva to the a ‘The concept of independent cil ations as wo application this ase, Cea, the ei acon very ach wean tothe proceeding The min sate tase i tho el caw ts the genuienesy othe ignate f the ses ‘ppearng nthe Absa Deed of Se, intimately ested wo the charge of esata hough asian of pbc eat the criminal case the resolu othe maim ies he cl cas ould nce be determinative ofthe pl ot ‘noocence ofthe ace, hence the cout coretlysiajended he proceedings on the pound uf prude geeson {Dorngo Sings. etal No. 203287, 20793, Apa, 2037, Reyes Se: Rac asl TODSCRA 128), [RULE 112 - PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION MTQ.the remedy information ied without author, ‘Macompaint or intormation mas be filed" dismissed by a9 enestgting prosecutor mithout the aioe ‘unten authority or appraxal ofthe clo ly prusssulor or eh ate proscitor ot the Ombuds o Ms deputy (Qusyv People, GR. No 216920 January 13.2016) 4s a general rule, complats 0° information’ Med before the courts without the par writen authorty oF pore of the feegoing authored oters vendors the sme elective and, thertore, subject quashal Parsi tb Section 3 (4), ule 117 ofthe Rules wh provides ho the accused may move to gust the complaint or norman On {any ofthe following grounds thatthe oe who led he information hd auth odo, inthis relation, People. Corp RNa 138178 March 23 201% Bry instructs atthe ling of information by am fcr without the rege author toile the some ensues 3 arto try which canna be cred by silence waren, asescenc, or even by express consent. Hence sth ground ray be raned st any sage of the rocesings (Vila: hoe 88 Phi 402 2951 eop Drona, GR. Ne 207949, Soper, 2015, Peri arabs). Power co imvestijote may be delegated. Tae power o[hnestite s/o gause oe Inestgaad al charges rims, misdemeanors and violations ‘of pena las an oreinances within thei especie actions agains the persons accused” he may eed delegaic his pow to hs sbordiates 35 he may deem ners nthe tres othe raseation service Dion chs eview proscar “author to approve {Fact on ay resolution, order, sua thee at, ad ay slormaton recomended by ny prosector Io appro thou neessarilydminshing the Cay Proseuterssuthny to tt det fn appropriate case (People ¥- Danale, GR No. 207049, September 9, 2015) Whisdebiowers not the most guilty; Ombudsman con gront immunty from prosscutlon, “The authority to grat immunity isnt an erent acl ncn Indeed, Congress has veed soc power i {he Ombudsman, aswel 5 the Secretary of use. Bese, the detsan employ anatase ats tte tess mist rnecessanlyeriginate from the public prsseuars whone mason i to abtam 2 success prosecution ofthe several ‘ccused before the courts Theater de vat 382, haves wisn af the toe srength of the roseraton «evidence tt sfter the tials ovr. Consequently, cous should penerly defer tthe judgment othe reseraton and enya mation dlscharge an accuse so he canbe used asa wes only clearence far ote he requements of Secon T7, Rule 119 forthe 2000 Rules of Criminal Procedure| he expand Quarto Mares ‘The decision to grant nmunty rom prazestin forms a onetent part ofthe prosecution process. ts eset attic deision to oepo prosecution fa person or government to achieve 3 higher ebpctve tsa deliberate renunciation ofthe gt ofthe Sate to prsecue al who appeat tbe ‘nly of tang commits a eames json hes a heparan ned ofthe State etn the ‘onvition of the more gully crumiaas wh, otherwise tl probably lade the ong. arm the ‘resection. The poner rosesut icudes the right io deermine wha shal be prosected and ‘te corolla sight to dscide whom nol io prosecute, a ssewing the crest of prsecatortal sscetion inhesearcas. the jurisdiction ofthe respondent cours Unite, For the business of ‘covc.of tice it ean impartial tribunal and ot ioget involved with he successor falas of ‘thesproseeuion to prosteute sery nove snd thon the proseaton may erin the selection 8 tt Strategies but such rors ae not tr neutral courts wo ret, any mare han courts shoul erect ‘blunders the lense (674 Pi 370201); eyes. The Ombadnman Noe 21259994, March 1, bois) Dismissahwtihout prejudice of a criminal case; motion to revive Is sufficient, no need for another preliinary Investigator " é r A cman cst which was dsmised without prejudke may be revive by ing af 2 motion to revne the Information is sufienr tree such cae This tinguished rn the revi ef acl ease wh hs bon homed ‘without prejudice where thre new complaint toe Med theres eval Ite imma ae there no heed ar new prcbmnary aestiaton, Amordercsmsing cas without prejudice saa orden motion for reconsideration or ape ‘stumey fie ‘rami cases winch have ben dissed without prjuice nay be restated by mation tire the odor of isms! become flor thereat, by fy a ew information fr the ole The view that new compat fr Preliminary vestigation bad tots ied elre the charges ays cd be eed tat eres ‘nthe argument that a ne preliminary tvestgaion mnt la condi, este that the same only squire ards to accord the aecused the rig ashi counter aides a evadence nly the flown instances (@) where the original wireses the prose sme of ham my babe rected testimonies or may ave ‘or may no longer be avalable and new wie or he Sate have emerges (where aie ran he cr acase, ‘ther person are charged unr now criminal compat forthe same oles at esesanly iced harem) I tinder 's new cFumnal complaint the orginal charge has teen upgrade or (a) under anew rund mpl the thectrom 3 |AEC2019. Mage Areas a Hemel Law (seep combine REVISED conoid BDRTED/ml/EVSA ry 4 ae i na Ubty ofthe accused supped rn boing a accessory t that af prpa. Since ane ofthe foregone Insiances aban ths ase. there 1 no need to condactanuthe prdumnary avestigauon (Cesonv. Ma, Mercdias Uuterex.imber capacity as Ombudsman, at GH. No 194859-4), Ap 20, 2095, Pula Borabe Probable couse may be determined fr the fling of a information maybe based on hearsay evidence "robate case can hexane hearsay endeace lang a thre subnet ass or ereding the ars. Hearty evidence 1s admssible i determing probable ease 4 ema svesigation Because such nvestyaton 6 merely prebmnary, and docs ot finaly ahudate res al gations of partes. However siminsrtve cases, where ight ad obition ar ay adja, what requ rb eidence” whch nats ete or even pial on hears de Setanta basin tena ebsaatal evidence because Sista evidence cxlues bestay cridene whe substan bass comin fue hearsay encence To require the npction a Ang iba, 2 amped in Sn prelnary investigations wilt hange the quan of evidence rue i determning probate cause from events of Hhlioa ot prebbiny of git to substantial endenc of gull (Sen Iggy Berto raw Ooh Omens ac No. 21 14081, omry 2 2018; Poe. Mara Merce (Guterrex etal, No 194158 Ocaber 21,2015). ule 113 - ARREST When person erested without werrant. “AgeaceatTer ora private person mey, thou 3 ware arrest a person (o)_ When sn his presence the pars tobe arrested has comnted i ecusly commiting, of attempting to (0) When an ffense has int jst boom commited, and be hs probable cause to belie based, personal owed of ft and cncasance thatthe prsonte be arrested has commited ed 4) Whan the person tote arrestod sa pasonr who has escaped Kom a peal etblshnen place where Be serving dnl agen or temporally confined wis hs caves pain, or has escaped wie beng transeres fom one continent tosh In eases fling under paragraphs (2) nd (Q)heeo, the pers arrested wouts Warrant shal be forthwth \elvored to the nearest poice ston rfl ad he thal be proceed against accordance wih Rule 112 Section 7 (Sec, People vs. ave 41 SCAD 767, GR. Ne. 74189, May 2 1995, People v. Blaze, GR. No, 173474, August 29, oo, ‘Rue i case a warrantless orrest is made bast n persona knowledge of focts Personal knowlege o fare must be Based on probable cas, whieh means an actual bee or reasonable sounds of minpicion The grounds of suspen ae resumtble when the absence of atl Bele of the arresting fiers, the suspicion thatthe person to he arrested is prebsbly guy of comming the offense is based on actu facts, supported by crcumscnce uf strong themselves terest he probable cause o aul ofthe person tobe avested, Aveasomble suspicion, theefor mast be ouned on prbuble cus, cupid with good Eth onthe part sf the pane fiers making the arrest. SocienS() Rule 113 ofthe 1995 ules on Crime Procedure doesnot require ‘he arresting offers o personally witiss the commission of he oes wt he ees (Abela. Dora, GR. Ne 170672, 1 August 2008 $96 SRA 220, 226-227 ating People w Cubbie 91 Pi 243, 267 (2001); Ona v. Res, {GR 81567, tober 1998, 202 SCRA 251, 261; Pepple Loada, 454 Pl 241, 250-251 (2003) Executive and Judicial determination of probable use ‘as aul court may atoms case or aco probable cause Determination of probable cause my be ele exxeuve or ud The fists made bythe public prosecute using preliminary investigation where he's gen broad dncotn to dtermine ther rabable cease ets Drpose of lings tuaten wealth amassed amounted tat least PS lon the mans of amassing the Mi eten weak ~ whether through {combination or series of overt acts under Seton 1) of RA NO. 7080 esnips ciement tt THs Be ‘lege. ot thermody to fs mation for bof pata “The isto the Phundr Law lisa the pase "cmbinaton of srs vet cumin at” Hence, even the accumulated tt gotten weatth amounts best P50 milo, a person canna be prosecuted for the rime of plunder I this resulted from a single criminal ack. Ts wterpretaon othe lune Law ts tery lear om the Eangressosl deliberations. ‘Conserng that widiut amu of overt o rma ats, there can enn crime of pander the warous ert «ats that consitate the “combination” and “sees the Inoraaton alleged are tater ats that should ot only be Siege but must be stated wre sem deftones that the seas ol Koow what het petal emaged ‘thang hy he stands charg soar He could pope dled Rmetf against he charges on Ponce Enel People, (tal, G1 No. 21555, August 112038) When court may suspend the arrelyament ofthe accuse “Thesraignment shall be suypetniethetine these {a} The accused appears toe sonny rom sn unsound mens condition whch effectively renders hum tunable to iy endorse charge pas hi an! to plead steligety teeta In sich eee, the oar Salone hs rental examin necessary hs oinement for such urs (@) Thecourt nds the exatence of valid peed question aad (@)_euton for revew othe reoltion a posse is peng 3 he the Departent fst. othe fice ofthe President; panded that the pene a suspension shall ao exceed 60 days coun from he Ming ofthe petzion with he evtenngie (Se. 11} ale 117 - MOTIONTO QUASH Procedure Yfa Motion to Ques denied “The lowing shold be coe incase 3 MTA ve denied (0) he should plea, (2) the accuse shou go to tral without prude to the pil defenses he invoked nt motion (3). he an appeal rm te gent of convection if any an inerpose te geal the moto 38 an error (Acharon vs. Purina, 13 SCRA 308 Reyes vs. Calo, L-46198, Decenber 20, 198: Gambos vs. Cruz 1W2SERA 642 [1985 Soran People, GR. Ne 1991157-1 ne 30, 2009) ‘Accused convited ofthe crime o ileal recrutment: no double jeopardy fpreseuted forthe crime of sofa. ‘The connaton of he ateucl ortega Ferutment commited (lane sae ld nt precide ber personal abit for etfa under Arte 15(2(3) ofthe Ried Pal Code on the ground of sbeting ert dou jeopardy. “Te elements of esta ae charged ae, namely (1) the accused defrauded nother by abuse of onde of By ean of secean (2) the oe party ar urd pay sees damage or pejuien pate of pons estinaton Poop Toletino, Git No, 208606 fly 12005, 763 SCRA 332} fn ona the cre of egal recrtmentcomte i age scale esis eifernt elements Double opr could wat esl rom presacuting and convicting the aeused plan for both crines considering that they were eee ein rom each oder not oly fem hr hing punished under Aiernt statutes but ls rom thei elements beng dflerent (People . Baye, Gk Mo 170192, ebruay 10, 2018, erin equistes forthe wo (2) year and the one (1) year bar rule to opp For the fst paragraph of Rule 117, Soe Bfhe Rals of Crm Procedte opp the folowing requis are mecesary 2 The prosecution wih the express cnlority of he aceused or the accused ves for a provisions! in ern) csossa ofthe ase rb he presen athe ceased owe or 3 provisional ems of Reese 1b Thoulfended party isnot ofthe motion fra prousional dams ofthe ase © The cout spsan order ranting the mation an smissing he cess provsonaly 44 Thepublc reser served with copy oe ard rota nisl he case, ‘The-foregning requiviments ace conditions sine qu non to the application of the tme-har im the socond aragih of he new rule he ron te forthe requirement ofthe express consent ef the scused to prvi ‘sisal fat cse toa sn rm subsequently asserting tt he eof tho crm case al plac ut ‘oublejeoparty for thc sine offense o fran oensenersanly included therein (People vel BSCRA 8). ‘Allygh he Second paragraph of he ew rue states that te ore of msl shal become Pete Ome ar afar the uate eo wit the case having been fevived. the prvsiom shale contin to mesa tha the Order of smi shal Become permancrt one year alter sere ft oder of dias on the pubic pomcato Who fas cont af tha prosecution (Re 112, Sec 8}, about the cmuna cave hain Boe reed The public prostate anne be expected to comply with the tnelne lessee served with copy athe onder of dsm (People, ez, Gi He 14945, Ape 12003 cali), Reasons forthe une-bar re reviving oerkna cave that hasbeen dismissed “The new rule wes concepuaed prin to enance the adaunstration ofthe crew asic system an he ‘ngs to de proces ofthe State and the scused by eliminating te dleterios practice of tal cours ot prose

    You might also like