Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mechanical Engineering
• Industry 4.0 and its essentials will also be introduced in the course.
Agile Manufacturing:
Concept of agile manufacturing, difference between lean and agile manufacturing, four
Rs of supply chain- responsiveness, reliability, resilience and relationship, set up time
and lot sizing, level production, Leagile manufacturing.
Industry 4.0:
Six design principles of industry 4.0- Interoperability (internet of things and internet of
services), virtualization, decentralisation, real time capability, service orientation and
modularity. Building blocks of industry 4.0- autonomous robots, simulation, horizontal
& vertical system integration, industrial internet of things, cyber security, additive
manufacturing, augmented reality, big data analysis.
Dr. Rajnish Mallick, AP, MED, TIET 10
References and Literature
Text Books:
• Monks, J.G. Operations Management, Second Edition,
McGraw-Hills, (1996)
• EST
CORRECTION
Repair or MOTION
WAITING
Rework Any wasted motion
Any non-work time to pick up parts or
waiting for tools, stack parts. Also
supplies, parts, etc.. wasted walking
Types
PROCESSING of OVERPRODUCTION
Producing more
Doing more work than Waste than is needed
is necessary
before it is needed
INVENTORY
Maintaining excess CONVEYANCE
inventory of raw mat’ls, Wasted effort to transport
parts in process, or materials, parts, or
finished goods. finished goods into or
out of storage, or
between
processes.
Agile Manufacturing – What and Why?
In the 1980s and 90s, computer programmers were using
traditional manufacturing methods, such as the Waterfall
approach, to manage their development work. They spent months
to years developing one product, releasing it when it was finished,
only to find that it had already become outdated by the time it hit
the market.
Mechanical Engineering
CORRECTION
Repair or MOTION
WAITING
Rework Any wasted motion
Any non-work time to pick up parts or
waiting for tools, stack parts. Also
supplies, parts, etc.. wasted walking
Types
PROCESSING of OVERPRODUCTION
Producing more
Doing more work than Waste than is needed
is necessary
before it is needed
INVENTORY
Maintaining excess CONVEYANCE
inventory of raw mat’ls, Wasted effort to transport
parts in process, or materials, parts, or
finished goods. finished goods into or
out of storage, or
between
processes.
Manufacturing Systems
*Black J.T. (2000) MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS. In: Swamidass P.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Production and Manufacturing Management. Springer,
Boston, MA . https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-0612-8_559
• The goal is to create and add value to the inputs during the
transformation. In the case of manufacturing, the goal is to add value to a
raw material by changing its shape or properties.
Having the appropriate manufacturing system for your product can yield a
variety of benefits, including the ability to maintain the high quality of your
goods, being more efficient in your production processes and saving money
across the board.
The right system can also help you produce higher volumes, thereby meeting
your production volume targets.
Handbook of Design, Manufacturing, and Automation by Richard C. Dorf and Andrew Kusiak, there are four types of manufacturing systems:
custom manufacturing, intermittent manufacturing, continuous manufacturing and flexible manufacturing
UPE503 Dr. Rajnish Mallick MED
Manufacturing Systems
Custom Manufacturing Systems
Custom manufacturing is by far the oldest and most popular type of
manufacturing system in existence. It also happens to be associated
with both the highest-quality products and the lowest-volume
efficiency.
In the custom manufacturing system, each item is produced by a
single craftsperson, who works solely by hand or with the help of a
machine. When machines are used, they tend to be highly
specialized to their task and cannot produce more than one item at a
time.
This system will tend to have the highest unit cost for the product
manufactured. As a result, custom-manufactured products are of the
highest quality but are also the most expensive products in the
market.
Mechanical Engineering
Having the appropriate manufacturing system for your product can yield a
variety of benefits, including the ability to maintain the high quality of your
goods, being more efficient in your production processes and saving money
across the board.
The right system can also help you produce higher volumes, thereby meeting
your production volume targets.
Handbook of Design, Manufacturing, and Automation by Richard C. Dorf and Andrew Kusiak, there are four types of manufacturing systems:
custom manufacturing, intermittent manufacturing, continuous manufacturing and flexible manufacturing
UPE503 Dr. Rajnish Mallick MED
Manufacturing Systems
Custom Manufacturing Systems
Custom manufacturing is by far the oldest and most popular type of
manufacturing system in existence. It also happens to be associated
with both the highest-quality products and the lowest-volume
efficiency.
In the custom manufacturing system, each item is produced by a
single craftsperson, who works solely by hand or with the help of a
machine. When machines are used, they tend to be highly
specialized to their task and cannot produce more than one item at a
time.
This system will tend to have the highest unit cost for the product
manufactured. As a result, custom-manufactured products are of the
highest quality but are also the most expensive products in the
market.
7
Manufacturing Systems
Flexible Manufacturing Systems
Flexible manufacturing is a modern manufacturing system that has
become very popular.
2. Operators will become more skilled and competent, as each job gives
them learning opportunities.
Limitations
1. Higher cost due to frequent set up changes.
2. Higher level of inventory at all levels and hence higher inventory cost.
Mechanical Engineering
Examples:
– Group technology & manufacturing cells
– Grocery stores
Tools like drawings, 3-D models, and CAD software are available to
facilitate this process
– Logical order
Mechanical Engineering
– Logical order
7
Layout Calculations con’t
• Step 4: Compute the theoretical minimum number of
stations
– TM = number of stations needed to achieve 100%
efficiency (every second is used)
– Start at the first station & choose the longest eligible task following
precedence relationships
– Continue adding the longest eligible task that fits without going over the
desired cycle time
– When no additional tasks can be added within the desired cycle time, begin
assigning tasks to the next workstation until finished
Workstation Eligible task Task Selected Task time Idle time
A A 50 10
1
B B 5 5
C C 25 35
2 D D 15 20
E, F, G G 15 5
E, F E 12 48
F F 10 38
3
H H 18 20
I I 15 5
Efficiency (%) =
t
=
165 sec.
(100) = 91.7%
NC 3 stations x 60 sec.
– Balance delay (%) is the amount by which the line falls short
of 100%
D D M D
M M D D D
SG CG CG D
M M D D D SG
Mechanical Engineering
• The above process is typically repeated in multiple passes, where a good goal
for each pass is to cut the changeover time in half (hence the biggest wins are
typically in the first pass).
Solution:
XL includes a complete SMED overview as one of its integrated Improvement
Techniques.
XL can also track changeover elements (see below), and display actual and target
time for each element on the XL scoreboard.
Strategy: Provide real-time plant floor indication for how long changeovers
are taking compared to the target time.
Solution: XL includes job metrics that count down remaining production for the
current job.
XL tracks Job Goal Count (how many pieces you plan to make), Pieces to Goal
(the amount of pieces remaining), and Percent Toward Goal. This information can
be displayed on the XL scoreboard and is also available for all production assets
through the All Production dashboard (see below).
UPE503 Dr. Rajnish Mallick MED 18
Three Great Strategies
• Provide Advance Notification of Changeovers
Solution:
Experience has taught that the human elements are typically much
faster and less expensive to improve then the technical elements.
In other words, the quick wins are usually with the human elements.
Mechanical Engineering
Before Starting:
• Virtually every manufacturing company that performs changeovers can benefit
from SMED. That does not mean, however, that SMED should be the first
priority. In the real world, companies have finite resources, and those
resources should be directed to where they will generate the best return.
• So what should be the first priority? For most companies, the first priority
should be ensuring that there is a clear understanding of where productive
time is being lost, and that decisions on improvement initiatives are made
based on hard data. That means putting a system in place to collect and
analyze manufacturing performance data.
Changeover time should be measured as the time between production of the last
good part (at full speed) and production of the first good part (at full speed).
• In this step, the team works together to identify all of the elements of the
changeover. The most effective way of doing this is to videotape the entire
changeover and then work from the videotape to create an ordered list of
elements, each of which includes:
The deliverable from this step should be a complete list of changeover elements, each with a
description and time “cost”.
UPE503 Dr. Rajnish Mallick MED 14
Strategy Roadmap for Implementation
Step Three – Separate External Elements
In this step, elements of the changeover process that can be performed with little
or no change while the equipment is running are identified and moved “external”
to the changeover (i.e. performed before or after the changeover).
It is not unusual for changeover times to be cut nearly in half with this step alone.
For each element the team should ask the following question: Can this element,
as currently performed or with minimal change, be completed while the
equipment is running?
If the answer is yes, categorize the element as external and move it before or after
the changeover, as appropriate.
The deliverable from this step should be an updated list of changeover elements,
split into three parts: External Elements (Before Changeover), Internal Elements
(During Changeover), and External Elements (After Changeover).
• For each internal element, the team should ask the following questions: If
there was a way to make this element external, what would it be? How could
we do it?
• This will result in a list of elements that are candidates for further action. This
list should be prioritized so the most promising candidates are acted on first.
Fundamentally, this comes down to performing a cost/benefit analysis for each
candidate element:
• Cost as measured by the materials and labour needed to make the necessary
changes.
• Benefit as measured by the time that will be eliminated from the changeover.
UPE503 Dr. Rajnish Mallick MED 17
Strategy Roadmap for Implementation
Step Four – Convert Internal Elements to External
• Once the list has been prioritized work can begin on making the necessary
changes. Examples of techniques that can be used to convert internal elements
to external are:
The deliverable from this step should be an updated list of changeover elements, with fewer
internal elements, and additional external elements (performed before or after the
changeover).
UPE503 Dr. Rajnish Mallick MED 18
Strategy Roadmap for Implementation
Step Five – Streamline Remaining Elements
• In this step, the remaining elements are reviewed with an eye towards
streamlining and simplifying so they can be completed in less time. First
priority should be given to internal elements to support the primary goal of
shortening the changeover time.
• For each element, the team should ask the following questions: How can this
element be completed in less time? How can we simplify this element?
The deliverable from this step should be a set of updated work instructions for the changeover
(i.e. creating Standardized Work) and a significantly faster changeover time!
UPE503 Dr. Rajnish Mallick MED 20
Three Great Strategies
• In SMED, the changeover process is broken into a sequenced list
of steps called elements.
Mechanical Engineering
Long range
Intermediate
range
Short
range
Economic,
Corporate competitive, Aggregate
strategies and political demand
and policies conditions forecasts
Establishes operations
Business Plan
and capacity strategies
Establishes
Aggregate plan
operations capacity
13-12
Aggregate Planning Strategies
• Proactive
– Alter demand to match capacity
• Reactive
– Alter capacity to match demand
• Mixed
– Some of each
Demand Options
• Pricing
• Promotion
• Back orders
• New demand
Capacity Options
• Hire and layoff workers
• Overtime/slack time
• Part-time workers
• Inventories
• Subcontracting
Aggregate Planning Strategies
• Disadvantages
– The cost of adjusting output rates and/or workforce
levels
Level Approach
• Advantages
– Stable output rates and workforce
• Disadvantages
– Greater inventory costs
– Increased overtime and idle time
– Resource utilizations vary over time
Techniques for Aggregate Planning
13-20
Cumulative Graph
Cumulative output/demand
Cumulative
production
Cumulative
demand
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Average Inventory
13-24
Numerical Example
13-25
Numerical Example
13-26
Numerical Example
Aggregate Planning: Variable subject to control
These controllable variables constitute pure strategies by which
fluctuations in demand and uncertainties in production activities
can be accommodated.
13-28
Thanks
Mechanical Engineering
Long range
Intermediate
range
Short
range
Economic,
Corporate competitive, Aggregate
strategies and political demand
and policies conditions forecasts
Establishes operations
Business Plan
and capacity strategies
Establishes
Aggregate plan
operations capacity
13-12
Aggregate Planning Strategies
• Proactive
– Alter demand to match capacity
• Reactive
– Alter capacity to match demand
• Mixed
– Some of each
Demand Options
• Pricing
• Promotion
• Back orders
• New demand
Capacity Options
• Hire and layoff workers
• Overtime/slack time
• Part-time workers
• Inventories
• Subcontracting
Aggregate Planning Strategies
• Disadvantages
– The cost of adjusting output rates and/or workforce
levels
Level Approach
• Advantages
– Stable output rates and workforce
• Disadvantages
– Greater inventory costs
– Increased overtime and idle time
– Resource utilizations vary over time
Techniques for Aggregate Planning
13-20
Cumulative Graph
Cumulative output/demand
Cumulative
production
Cumulative
demand
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Average Inventory
13-24
Numerical Example
13-25
Numerical Example
13-26
Numerical Example
Aggregate Planning: Variable subject to control
These controllable variables constitute pure strategies by which
fluctuations in demand and uncertainties in production activities
can be accommodated.
13-28
Thanks
Mechanical Engineering
Long range
Intermediate
range
Short
range
13-6
Basic Strategies
• Disadvantages
– The cost of adjusting output rates and/or workforce
levels
Level Approach
• Advantages
– Stable output rates and workforce
• Disadvantages
– Greater inventory costs
– Increased overtime and idle time
– Resource utilizations vary over time
Techniques for Aggregate Planning
UPE503 – L09
Lean and Agile Manufacturing
Mechanical Engineering
If I charged £20 for each product and sold ten then my total
revenue would be £200.
Breakeven analysis
Andy set up AP Sports in 2012 and his costs and revenues were
as follows:
1 10 5 15 10
2 10 10 20 20
3 10 15 25 30
4 10 20 30 40
5 10 25 35 50
Breakeven analysis
Aggregate
Planning
Disaggregation
Master
Schedule
Disaggregating the Aggregate Plan
Breakeven analysis
Mechanical Engineering
MRP is most valuable to companies involved in assembly operations and least valuable to
those in fabrication. One more point to note: MRP does not work well in companies that
produce a low number of units annually.
MRP Structure
The material requirements planning (MRP) portion of manufacturing activities
most closely interacts with the master schedule, bill of materials file, inventory
records file, and the output reports
Overall View of the Inputs to a Standard Material Requirements Planning Program and the
Reports Generated by the Program
Data Inputs and Outputs of a MRP Structure
Thanks
Mechanical Engineering
Overall View of the Inputs to a Standard Material Requirements Planning Program and the
Reports Generated by the Program
Data Inputs and Outputs of a MRP Structure
D em an d f or Prod u ct s
Product demand for end items comes primarily from two main sources.
The first is known customers who have placed specific orders, such as
those generated by sales personnel, or from interdepartmental
transactions. These orders usually carry promised delivery dates.
This BOM file is one of the three main inputs to the MRP program.
(The other two are the master schedule and the inventory records
file.)
Bill of Materials (BOM)
Bill of Materials (BOM)
The BOM file is often called the product structure file or product
tree because it shows how a product is put together. It contains the
information to identify each item and the quantity used per unit of
the item of which it is a part.
Part B is made of one unit of Part D and four units of Part E. Part C
is made of two units of Part F, five units of Part G, and four units of
Part H.
Product L Hierarchy in (a) Expanded to the Lowest Level of Each Item in (b)
Inventory Records
The inventory records file can be quite lengthy.
MRP program performs its analysis from the top of the product
structure downward, calculating requirements level by level.
Mechanical Engineering
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psTNv1blsCU
History of Lean
▪ https://www.lean.org/whatslean/history.cfm
WHY LEAN?
▪ Continuous Improvements:
• Decrease Cycle Time
• Eliminate sources of waste in a process
• Increase Throughout
Lean Manufacturing –What and Why?
CORRECTION
Repair or MOTION
WAITING
Rework Any wasted motion
Any non-work time to pick up parts or
waiting for tools, stack parts. Also
supplies, parts, etc.. wasted walking
Types
PROCESSING of OVERPRODUCTION
Producing more
Doing more work than Waste than is needed
is necessary
before it is needed
INVENTORY
Maintaining excess CONVEYANCE
inventory of raw mat’ls, Wasted effort to transport
parts in process, or materials, parts, or
finished goods. finished goods into or
out of storage, or
between
processes.
LEAN MANUFACTURING
A COLLECTION OF TECHNIQUES
AIMED AT WASTE MINIMIZATION
LEAN MANUFACTURING
A COLLECTION OF TECHNIQUES
AIMED AT WASTE MINIMIZATION
Lean Manufacturing