You are on page 1of 1

If a company’s board of directors wants management to maximize shareholders wealth, should

the CEO’s compensation be set as a fixed amount, or should the compensation depend on how
well the firms performs? If it is based on performance, how should performance be measured?
Would it be easier to measure performance by the growth rate in reported profits or the growth in
the stock’s intrinsic value? Which would be the better performance measure? Why?

You might also like