Professional Documents
Culture Documents
9. Assume that the dollar market value of a position is $100 000 and the price volatility is 1.50%. What are the daily earnings at risk
for this position (round to two decimals)?
A. $150.00
B. $1500.00
C. $15 000.00
D. Not enough information to solve the question.
10. Assume the market value of a position is $100 000 and that its modified duration is 3.30 years. Further assume that the potential
adverse move in yield is 16.5 basis points. What are the daily earnings at risk for this position (round to two decimals)?
A. $54.45
B. $544.50
C. $54 450.00
D. There is not enough information to solve the question.
11. The N-day market value at risk (VAR) equals daily earning at risk multiplied by the square root of N if we assume that yield
shocks are:
A. dependent, that daily volatility is approximately constant and that the FI is 'locked in' to holding the asset in question for
N number of days
B. independent, that daily volatility is approximately constant and that the FI is 'locked in' to holding the asset in question for
N number of days
C. dependent, that daily volatility is approximately constant and that the FI is 'locked in' to holding the asset in question for
N minus one number of days
D. independent, that daily volatility is approximately constant and that the FI is 'locked in' to holding the asset in question for
N minus one number of days
12. Which of the following statements is true?
A. DEAR acknowledges that an FI can sell all its bonds tomorrow, as markets are entirely liquid.
B. DEAR assumes that an FI cannot sell all its bonds tomorrow, although in reality this might be possible.
C. DEAR assumes that an FI can sell all its bonds tomorrow, although in reality it might take many days for the FI to unload
its position.
D. DEAR acknowledges that an FI cannot sell all its bonds tomorrow, but that instead it might take many days for the FI to
unload its position.
13. Assume an FI's daily earnings at risk are $5000 and that the FI is required to hold its position for 10 days. What is the position's
VAR (round to two decimals)?
A. $5000 10 = $15 811.39
B. $5000 (10 – 1) = $15 000.00
C. $5000 10 = $707.11
D. $5000 (10 – 1) = $636.40
14. Assume the dollar market value of an FI's position is $200 000 and the calculated price volatility is 1.25%. What is the VAR of
the position if the FI is required to hold the position for 6 days (round to two decimals)?
A. $2 683.28
B. $6123.72
C. $200 000.00
D. $489 897.95
15. Assume the dollar market value of an FI's position is $200 000 with a modified duration of four years. The potential adverse
move in the yield is 16.5 basis points. What is the VAR of the position if the FI is required to hold the position for 6 days (round to two
decimals)?
A. $1320.00
B. $3233.33
C. $330.00
D. $200 000.00
16. Which of the following statements is true?
A. The relative illiquidity of a market reduces an FI's losses.
B. The relative illiquidity of a market exposes an FI to magnified losses.
C. The relative illiquidity of a market does not influence an FI's loss size.
D. None of the listed options are correct.
17. Suppose an FI holds a $2 000 000 trading portfolio with an average beta of 1.0. Over the last year, the daily return on the stock
market index was 3%. How much does the FI stand to lose in earnings if adverse stock market returns materialise tomorrow?
A. $2 000 000 0.03 = $60 000
B. $2 000 000 1.0 0.03 = $60 000
C. $2 000 000 1.65 0.03 = $99 000
D. $2 000 000 2.33 0.03 = $139 800
18. Assume an FI holds a foreign exchange position of EUR 200 000 and further assume that the dollar per unit of EUR rate is
$1.053/EUR. What is the dollar value of the position (round to two decimals)?
A. EUR 200 000 1.053 = $210 600.00
B. EUR 200 000 1.053 = EUR 210 600.00
C. EUR 200 000 / 1.053 = $189 933.52
D. EUR 200 000 / 1.053 = EUR 189 933.52
20. Which of the following statements best describes the relationship between total risk, systematic risk and unsystematic risk?
A. Total risk is the product of systematic and unsystematic risk.
B. Total risk is the sum of systematic and unsystematic risk.
C. Total risk is the quotient of systematic and unsystematic risk.
D. Total risk is the difference between systematic and unsystematic risk.
21. Which of the following statements is true?
A. Systematic risk reflects the co-movement of a stock with the market portfolio, reflected by the stock's vega and the
volatility of the market portfolio.
B. Unsystematic risk reflects the co-movement of a stock with the market portfolio, reflected by the stock's vega and the
volatility of the market portfolio.
C. Systematic risk reflects the co-movement of a stock with the market portfolio, reflected by the stock's beta and the
volatility of the market portfolio.
D. Unsystematic risk reflects the co-movement of a stock with the market portfolio, reflected by the stock's beta and the
volatility of the market portfolio.
27. Which of the following statements is true?
A. The All Ordinaries index is Australia's premier market indicator, which represents the 100 largest companies listed on the
Australian Stock Exchange.
B. The All Ordinaries index is Australia's premier market indicator, which represents the 300 largest companies listed on the
Australian Stock Exchange.
C. The All Ordinaries index is Australia's premier market indicator, which represents the 500 largest companies listed on the
Australian Stock Exchange.
D. The All Ordinaries index is Australia's premier market indicator, which represents all companies listed on the Australian
Stock Exchange.
28. Which of the following statements is true?
A. In CAPM, it is assumed that systematic and unsystematic risk are positively correlated.
B. In CAPM, it is assumed that systematic and unsystematic risk are negatively correlated.
C. In CAPM, it is assumed that systematic and unsystematic risk are independent of each other.
D. None of the listed options are correct.
29. Assume an FI holds three different positions. The following DEAR information is available for the positions. Position 1 is a five-
year zero-coupon bonds with DEAR of $12 500, position 2 is a CHF spot contract with DEAR of $9500 and the third position are
Australian equities with DEAR of $34 500. Which of the following statements is true in relation to these positions?
A. The DEAR of the portfolio can be calculated by simply adding up the individual DEARs.
B. The DEAR of the portfolio can be calculated by simply multiplying the individual DEARs.
C. The DEAR of the portfolio can be calculated by simply adding up the individual DEARs and adjusting the sum by an
error factor gamma.
D. None of the listed options are correct.
30. Assume an FI holds three different positions. The following DEAR information is available for the positions. Position 1 is five-year
zero-coupon bonds with DEAR of $12 500, position 2 is a CHF spot contract with DEAR of $9500 and the third position are
Australian equities with DEAR of $34 500. The five-year zero-coupon bonds and the CHF spot position have a negative correlation of
0.5, the correlation between the zero-coupon bonds and the Australian equities is positive 0.5 and the correlation between the CHF
spot contract and the Australian equities is positive 0.2. What is the DEAR of the portfolio?
C.[12 5002 + 95002+ 34 5002 – 2(–0.5)(12 500)(9500) – 2(0.5)(12 500)(34 500) – 2(0.2)(9500)(34 500)]1/2 = $31 514
D. [$12 5002 + $95002 + $34 5002 + 2(–0.5)(12 500)(9500) + 2(0.5)(12 500)(34 500) + 2(0.2)(9500)(34 500)]1/2 = $43 363
58. Explain the basic concept of the RiskMetric model. What are the major disadvantages? How can the major
disadvantages be addressed?
RiskMetrics model (or the variance/covariance approach) developed by JPMorgan Chase, concentrates on measuring the market risk
exposure of an FI on a daily basis. That is, how much the FI will potentially lose if market conditions move adversely tomorrow. More
specifically, the RiskMetrics model calculates the daily earnings at risk (DEAR) in three trading areas—fixed income, foreign exchange
(FX) and equities—and then it estimates the aggregate risk of the entire trading portfolio. Measuring the risk exposure for periods longer
than a day (Value at risk—VAR) is, under certain assumptions, simply the transformation of the daily risk exposure number.
Most FIs establish limits for value at risk, daily earnings at risk, position limits and dollar trading loss limits for their trading portfolios.
Actual activity compared with these limits is then monitored daily. Should a risk exposure level exceed approved limit levels, management
must provide a strategy for bringing risk levels within approved limits.
A major criticism of RiskMetrics is the need to assume a symmetric (normal) distribution for all asset returns. Clearly, for some assets,
such as options and short-term securities (bonds), this is highly questionable. For example, the most an investor can lose if he or she
buys a call option on an equity is the call premium; however, the investor’s potential upside returns are unlimited. In a statistical sense, the
returns on call options are non-normal since they exhibit a positive skew. Another disadvantage is that the model assumes that the
correlations of asset returns be observed and calculated.
One way of addressing these disadvantages is to use the historic or back simulation approach which does not require that asset returns
be normally distributed and does not require that the correlations or standard deviations of asset returns be calculated. Implementation
requires the calculation of the value of the current portfolio of assets based on the prices or yields that were in place on each of the
preceding 500 days (or some large sample of days). These data are rank-ordered from worst to best case and percentile limits are
determined. For example, the 5% worst-case scenario provides an estimate with 95% confidence that the value of the portfolio will not fall
more than this amount.
The partial risk factor approach applies risk weights to the market values of trading portfolio securities, with enhancements to prudently
reflect hedging of and diversification across securities. Particularly, the partial risk factor approach requires the following process be
followed by FIs to determine capital requirements:
1. Assign instruments to asset 'buckets'. Instruments are placed in one of 20 asset buckets across each of five risk classes
according to their risk similarity. The five risk classes include FX, interest rates, equities, credit (including securitizations), and
commodities.
2. Calculate each bucket's risk measure. A risk measure is calculated for each bucket using a regulator-specified formula based on
ES estimates. The market values of the assets in each bucket are then multiplied by the risk weight.
3. Aggregate the buckets. The risk measures of the individual asset buckets are aggregated to obtain the capital requirement for
the trading portfolio.
The fuller risk factor approach requires the following process be followed by FIs to determine capital requirements:
1. Assign each instrument to applicable risk factors. Using a BIS-provided description of the mapping of securities to each risk
factor, FIs determine which risk factors influence the value of their trading portfolio securities.
2. Determine the size of the net risk position in each risk factor. Once the FI determines the risk factors that apply to each of its
trading portfolio securities, it uses a pricing model to determine the size of the risk positions from each security with respect to the
applicable risk factors. The size of the risk positions is based on the sensitivity of the instruments to the prescribed risk factors. The FI
then aggregates all negative and positive gross risk positions to determine the net risk position. For non-hedgeable risk factors, the gross
risk position would equal the net risk position.
3. Aggregate overall risk position across risk factors. To compute the overall capital requirement for each risk factor class, the net
risk positions determined in step 2 are aggregated. One option offered by the BIS is to assume that all risk factors of the same risk factor
class are independently distributed. Thus, the overall portfolio standard deviation is calculated using a sum of squares multiplied by a
scalar that approximates the average across the loss tail of the portfolio distribution (i.e. the ES). The ES scalar factor implemented by
regulators in Basel III is four. Thus, the overall capital requirement is four times the overall portfolio standard deviation.
61. Define the following terms within the context of the BIS standardised framework:
a. specific risk charge
b. general market risk charge
c. vertical offsets
d. horizontal offset
a. Specific risk charge: a charge reflecting the risk of the decline in the liquidity or credit risk quality of the trading portfolio over the FI's
holding period.
b. General market risk charge: a charge reflecting the modified duration and interest rate shocks for each maturity.
c. Vertical offsets: the assignment of additional capital charges because long and short positions in the same maturity bucket but in
different instruments cannot perfectly offset each other.
d. Horizontal offsets: the assignment of additional capital charges because long and short positions of different maturities do not
perfectly hedge each other.