May a prosecution witness, like Mary Jane Veloso (Mary Jane),
who was convicted of drug trafficking and sentenced to death by
the Indonesian Government and who is presently confined in a prison facility in Indonesia, testify by way of depositionwithout violating the constitutional right to confrontation of a witness by the accused?
FACTS
Mary Jane’s neighbors, Maria Cristina P. Sergio (Cristina), and
Julius L. Lacanilao (Julius), taking advantage of the former’s dire situation and susceptibility, offered Mary Jane a job as a domestic helper in Malaysia. Mary Jane believed that the job was a ray of hope so to pay Cristina and Julius her placement fee, she scraped whatever meager money she had, borrowed money from her relatives and prompted her husband to sell their precious motorcycle. Mary Jane, together with Cristina, eventually left Malaysia. However, upon their arrival in Malaysia, to Mary Jane’s dismay, she was informed by Cristina that the job intended for her was no longer available. After a few days in Malaysia, Cristina sent Mary Jane to Indonesia for a holiday with a promise that she will have a job upon her return. Cristina gave Mary Jane her plane ticket and a luggage to bring on her trip.
Upon arriving at the airport in Indonesia, Mary Jane was
apprehended by the police for allegedly carrying 2.6 kilograms of heroin inside her luggage. She was charged with drug trafficking and was eventually convicted and sentenced die by firing squad. Her execution was originally scheduled on April 9, 2015 but later rescheduled to April 28, 2015. Mary Jane was granted an indefinite reprieve in light of the arrest of Cristina and Julius who were later charged with qualified trafficking in person in violation of Section 4(a) in relation to Sections 3(a) and 6 of Republic Act (R.A.) No. 9208[1], illegal recruitment as penalized under Section 6, par. (k) and (1) ofR.A. No. 8042[2] and estafa in violation of Section 2(a), Article 315 of the Revised Penal Code.
Pursuant to the Treaty on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal
Matters entered into by Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty), the Indonesian authorities deferred indefinitely the execution of Mary Jane to afford her an opportunity to present her case against Cristina, Julius, and “Ike” who were allegedly responsible for recruiting and exploiting her to engage in drug trafficking.
MSCI-NACUSIP Local Chapter, Petitioner, vs. NATIONAL WAGES and Productivity Commission and Monomer Sugar CENTRAL, INC., Respondents. G.R. No. 125198. March 3, 1997 Facts
Denied Former Chief Justice Panganiban's Request For Full Retirement Benefits Under R.A. No. 910 and Would, Thus, Be Making A and For The Same Previously-Denied Services
Re: Request of (Ret.) Chief Justice Artemio V. Panganiban For Recomputation of His Creditable Service For The Purpose of Recomputing His Retirement Benefits Digest