أثر فاعلية أنظمة تخطيط موارد المنظمة على تميز الأداء المؤسسي - أسماء مروان الفاعوري

:

The Impact of (ERP) Enterprise Resources Planning

effectiveness on the Organization Performance
Excellence: An Empirical Study in the Greater
Amman Municipality
!

" #
$%!
(% ' &

3 3 2 01& ) ./ +,- )*
4 0
4 0 '*
0 (!
6% 5 3
2012-5
‫ب‬
‫ج‬
‫د‬
‫ ‬
‫

! ‬
‫ " " * " )' ( ' " & ‪#$ % ! %‬‬
‫ ‪\ %1 *2 /"

3
+$ ! +, " - . /0‬‬
‫‪%,31 *6 5 ! /3 " 5 /( %1 5‬‬
‫‪
7
" 1 *7 8 & / 5 /$ 9,‬‬
‫" ;‪./ :& / 5 % #",‬‬
‫;
‪># #? /". = /1 %7$ 5‬‬ ‫‪ &
3‬‬
‫ " @

! ‪
;A !
> / /A6 1‬‬
‫‪/3 /B ! 8 +$ /" 9. 8@# * :5 / *C‬‬
‫" ‪.% & 2 " +E$ % 2 ! / % D 85‬‬
‫وا و ا ‪ ،‬وه ا و ا ‪.‬‬
‫ا ‬
‫أ‪$‬ء ا "!ري‬
‫&‬
‫‪-4‬‬
‫!‪7 05 ( ", 2‬‬
‫!‪9
) & & 8 2‬‬
‫!‪05 ,- 3 ! 2 53% ' '* ", 3 2‬‬
‫!‪ 3 & : 2‬‬
‫ا
‬
‫و‬
) & : *
&#1 8;
7 <#
= %* 3 *
%
+ -4
) & : *
9 03 : *
0 % : *
" 5 > ?
0 3 4 > ?
' 5 4 :0 01#
1 1A1
3 C: % 2A1
4 $- 3A1
5 - 4A1
5 ) ;
5A1
6 & 6A1
7 )& 7A1
7 =, 8A 1
8 :34 ) &1 9A1
) " 4: 01#

11 " 4 1A2
‫ز‬
39 ) 2A2
39 5 ) 1A2A2
45 3/ ) 2A2A2
54 ) & 3A2
( )34 ) 3C :K 01#

55 1A3
55 C N3 2A3
57 ) 5 2 01& 1 ) 3A3
58 : 1&4 7 4A3
59 C ( 61 5A3
() ;# : 1&4 0& %* ) O: : N 01#

61 O: < 1A4
65 ) ;
2A4
) 1 O: %* : P 01#

71 ) 3 / 1A5
72 ) 1 2A5
N3 : *
73 5 N3 .1
75 3 N3 .2
6&R : *
79 . / ' & 3 (1) '* 6&
80 (: # ", 7 (2) '* 6&
. ERP '

81 .
2 )W / (3) '* 6&
‫ح‬
‫
ااول‬
'*A01# '*
&#1 03 &
03
56 / / /3F C0 1- 3
59 5 # )R 5 '* 2- 3
/&1 / 83 / 8
61 8$( -3 8" *$ 8; = 1- 4
/ *C
3 oracle ERP A

/&1 / 83 / 8

62
8$( -3 A *$ 8; = 2- 4
/ *C
3 oracle ERP A
/&1 / 83 / 8
64 8$( -3 , 8; = 3- 4
/ *C
3 oracle ERP A

/A /"3 .1 %" PC

65 4- 4

Q 91 7 " /$ /A

3 8" *$ . /3 %" PC
67 5- 4

Q 91 7
‫ط‬
‫‪68‬‬ ‫‪
Q 91 7
3 A *$ . PC‬‬ ‫‪6- 4‬‬
‫ ‪

3 , . /3‬‬
‫‪69‬‬ ‫‪7- 4‬‬
‫‪
Q 91
3 7‬‬
‫
ا
ل‬
‫ا‪%‬‬ ‫ا‪#$%‬ى‬ ‫ر ا‪-‬ر ا!‬
‫‪7‬‬ ‫أ ذج ا ‪-‬را‪$‬‬ ‫‪8-1‬‬
‫‪37‬‬ ‫ ‪2‬م ‪7 789‬س ا‪5‬داء ا از ‪;< 34‬ل‬

‫‪1-2‬‬
‫ا =ور ا‪5‬ر‪ 9‬ا ?>‬
‫* ‪) & :‬‬
‫‪/;0‬‬ ‫=‬ ‫‪5‬‬
‫‪79‬‬ ‫‪ /$ 9‬‬ ‫‪1‬‬
‫‪80‬‬ ‫‪= / V‬‬ ‫‪2‬‬
‫‪81‬‬ ‫(‪/‬‬ ‫‪3‬‬

‫ي‬
5 > ?
" ERP /A /A /"3 . ' 2 / 83&
:& /"3 / %@ != E /

3
Q 91 7
8" /A &E ( , !A *$! 8" *$) /A1
ERP ) A = \ / /$ / :& 89$ !/(
%.1 %@F '# 'CA 8 A % (System
!
" 14 V #7 /1 '-" / / /1
/ /1 8" +$ / 0 /. 85 / '&
E /
3 / *C ;A & / / 3 " #7 *3 (30)
+$ =$ c 9,

3 ! (100) & ERP A =
%" 9$2 SPSS /C0( /7 8,; 8 %"
2 / 8"0 / 8,; % %" /"

;0
: #& PC
6 -3 /A /"3 /C02 / 8 /5@ $ •
7
3 -/$ ( , ! A *$ ! 8" *$)
.
Q 91
‫ك‬
80 - /. 8E5 / 8F /5@ #A
+$ % *, %. / c" 8$ *; 2 '#

Oracle ERP % A = E /1 /,
85 *, ! /1 %.1 %@F
/ 8 Oracle ERP% A
" / /"3 *7 *, ! % /00
!Oracle ERP% A # %@ 8 /0

3
8 = /$ + " A * %; *,
. "
‫ل‬
Abstract
The Impact of (ERP) Enterprise Resources Planning effectiveness

on the Organization Performance Excellence: An Empirical Study
in the Greater Amman Municipality
Prepared by:
Asma Marwan ALfaouri
Supervised by:
Dr.Mohammed AL-Shura
The study aimed at detecting the impact of Enterprise Resources Planning (ERP) systems
effectiveness on achieving the distinction of institutional performance in the Greater
Amman Municipality, through the study of the dimensions of the effectiveness of these
systems (Information quality, System quality, User satisfaction) as it considered as one of
the management information systems. This study was based on the reason that the
Greater Amman Municipality has applied ERP systems, which included most of sectors
and jobs and aiming to planning and optimum utilization of human and financial
resources. This project has cost the Greater Amman Municipality approximately 14
million Jordanian Dinars of its budget. In order to achieve the goal of the study, the
researcher designed questionnaire to collect preliminary data , consisting of (30)
paragraph and distributed to members of the study sample. The study's sample contains
the Department of Finance in the Greater Amman Municipality of ERP system users,
which only use the ERP system and the number of participants was (100) user. In the
light of this, data were collected, analyzed, test hypotheses were undertaken by using the
statistical package SPSS. Afterwards, descriptive analysis, variance and correlation
‫م‬
coefficient for the study hypotheses. One of the most significant findings of this study
illustrates that there is an existence of a relationship with statistical evidence between
effectiveness of ERP Systems (Information Quality, System Quality, User Satisfaction)
and their combined impact on institutional performance excellence .
After the emergence of the relationship between the variables of the study the researcher
introduced a number of recommendations that aim to benefit from the outputs of the
study such as the need to cover all the areas under the Greater Amman Municipality with
regards to applying ERP system in order for planning and optimum utilization of the
Greater Amman Municipality resources, the necessity to improve the capacity of users to
the system of the ERP by holding specialized training courses on an ongoing basis, and
the need to implement the principle of participation effectiveness of workers in decision-
making through their use of the ERP system, as must be the necessity of activating the
system's ability to speed up the processing of complaints and suggestions of employees.
1
0 %0;
' 5 4
1-1
8 / 8A :& $ !/ /3

3 -7 8A D$
./3 . =
%,3 #3 8( 7 - " 8A /A
- - g0 f !/A

3 f
%1 8" +$ . /3;
. (Ayyagari, 2010) -" 8A

3 # 9F
- -$ V" &; 9#@ 8 * F /A1 :& %. ; 2
-$ /0 /" #3 /" !8" $
3 .
. ( Tsai, W., Chen, S., Hwang, E., & Hsu, J.2010 )
/3 * 77 2 '# / /A 80 5

3 &3 /& /5 8" " /A * 9 %@ /A"
. (Kennerely & Neely, 2001) V 85
1 (ERP) /A , Dh3 /"0
/ " .Q

/A /3 /"F *9; " /A1 :& .
. (Kennerely & Neely, 2001) % /A
8" /A ; 2 8 5 * 8 $
#& / 8F" /$ ( ERP ) /A /A 8 *$
% 8$ /A /A /A 2 !/ /3 / 7
, .C@ 85

3 8 2 %0 8 / " *5 /
2
) C7 85@ *2 !(SCM ) /"" *2 !/A /A 8
Tsai; ) / *( /( 8 !(PLM ) P * * *2 !(CRM
/ 8" P /A /A1 .(lin; Chen & Hung, 2007
" %0 /$( c

3 !/3 *7 " 8A *
% 5 ./$ " #5 / *7 !7 8$ 9,2 !/3 *7
/A /A ; 2 (Tsai et al., 2007 ) i
!/A *9; +3 !8" * *3 " !7 /A"
* g /A /A h3 !c 2 /3,2 ./ 8"
+ c - .Q !#5 #" * /3 %1 8" , "
. 8"
%0 '# /A A ; 2 8A h3 !#
5 .(O' Mahony & Doran, 2008) % *9; 7 % 2
8A " E /" :& 2 !/A /A + % ;
V 5 % ; /A /A j c ! &
(%65 ) D 2 (Scott, 1999 ) 8 2 !#"? /
80 83 5 ./A 5 /A /A j % 3 ? Q
#A % /A /A ; 8A D$

A *2 2 /, 8A 83 = 8 ;" /; '
Kumar & ) /A1 :& %.

5 /$ # +,
.(Hillegersberg, 2000
3
/A /"3 /& = ' " / :& 80 5
/3,( !
Q 91 " /A /A /"3 . 2 * !/A
!
.8Q 9 " /A /A ; .i 2 * ( 2
" /A /A . & / :#

1 '# h3
2 ./A /A /"3 > *;

Q 91
91 + %
3 !% F D " /A /"3 + %
.+ F D "

Q
:
&$'()‫ وأ‬% 2-1
( M. Lynne Markus, Sheryl Axline, David Petrie, & Sheryl Cornelis Tanis,2000)
!/A /A ;

3 /, *1 8 8#
%@ (%32 ) / 7 /A /A 8 2 / f
8$ /7 2 /A /A 2 ./ 8 >
./A
3 %1 8" +$ /" - "

)/A /A j ; = / 8 5

/C /1 'CA A 8" 2 !% * " 8 3 (ERP
*2 !7 /"" *2 !/ !/ %. !/A /
3 ;
!#"F / 'CA" % 8# #2 2 !&l + *2 !%01
. =1 'CA 8

5 ; %
3 j %7
% 7$ 5 ( ERP) /A A /. D 0 A
3 f / $ 3 !

j " = /
3 D %
7 " ( , !8" *$ !A *$) &? /A1 :& /"3 .
4
/;" -A ! (
Q " !/" 8" *9; ) :?
Q 91
.'CA -. % ; $ !/ j
:- P: 0 9 X

*$) f = /

3 /A /"3 .? =
m
Q 91 7 " ( , !8" *$ !A
-:/ /; /"C1 D j;
91 7 G=H A *$ 3 /A /"3 . .1
m= /
3
Q
G=H 8" *$ > 3 /A /"3 . .2
m= /
3
Q 91 7
7 G=H , 3 /A /"3 . .3
m= /
3
Q 91
: $- 3A1
91 7 " /A /"3 .? /3 2 / '#
-:%@ c /

3
Q
-3
Q 91 7 " /A /"3 . " ' .1
.A *$
-3
Q 91 7 " /A /"3 . " ' .2
.8" *$

5
-3
Q 91 7 " /A /"3 . " ' .3
. ,
: - 3A1
:5 -
% A no /( 8" A "

+, 1 / #? .1
. Ap :& ERP
I‫دار‬J‫ت ا‬4L ‫ ا‬2 ‫ أ اع‬-N‫ ا ارد آ‬P8QH 2 ‫ أ‬L! R‫ ل أ‬STH I-GH .2
.>$U ‫داء ا‬5‫ ا‬VH G=H‫و‬
7 8 /"

3 8" A /& /& .3
.ERP ‫م‬2 ‫ <;ل‬34

Q 91
3
/A .

3 (" ) 89$(
". 9i /3 / :& + .4
7
3 /"
3 8Q # /
3
. #
Q
: -
j, % / 9B 8" +$ ." A 2 .1
. D2 #$ D2 j$" f
/A /"3) j, & 8

/ 8 f /"5 .2
. /. " /A1 :& /. (/A
: ) ;
5A1
# j;
!/ /C /,; /l0 8 / /" 2 -
q: #@ 80 PC @ & $

/3 8,3 f@.
6
:: [;# HO
*$) 6 3 /A /A /"; /C02 / . $
7
3 (α ≤ 05.0) /&1 = ( , !A *$ !8"
: / 8,; # j; ! = E / =

Q 91
: ;# HO1
91 7 " /A /"; /C02 / . $
. (α ≤ 05.0) /&1 = A *$ > 3

Q
: ;# HO2
Q 91 7 " /A /"; /C02 / . $
. (α ≤ 05.0) /&1 = 8" *$ > 3
:5 ;# HO3
Q 91 7 " /A /"; /C02 / . $
. (α ≤ 05.0) /&1 = , > 3
: & 6A1
. 1q= E / :/" /
2012 / / 8# 2010 / / 8 :/7
.= /
3 ERP % A / ;A :/
7
3 " &. ( , !8" *$ !A *$):/"
.
Q 91
3
7
: )& 7A1
> / " f 9$2 = / +$ % .1
%03
3
3 - g, & c = /1 7 %.

.# / +$ " 97$

3 / /$#
* *C # 7 j3 = /
3 / *C .2
.#3 A %F #
A: =, 8A1
-./01 23‫ أ‬.'4

5
26‫ارد ا‬#8
A@)B‫ اداء ا‬D.1
‫دة‬#:
‫
ت‬8#'<‫ا‬ ‫
ت‬.'<‫آ
ءة ا‬
.'F‫اا‬
‫
م‬26‫دة ا‬#:
#6‫<' وا‬$‫ا‬
A@)B‫ا‬

>‫ر‬
?.80$@‫ا‬
q: / 8 " f 2 q: =,
1. Tsai, W., Chen, S., Hwang, E., & Hsu, J. (2010). A Study of the
Impact of Business Process on the ERP System
Effectiveness. International Journal of Business and
Management, 5(9), 26-37.
2. Mike kennerely and Andy Neely (2001). Enterprise Resource
Planning: Analyzing the impact. Integrated Manufacturing Systems,
12(2) 103-113.
8
3. Alexander Cedric (2009). Case Study: Exploring the effectiveness

of ERP Integration towards managerial performance.(Doctoral
dissertation),Capella university.

Q 91 7 " A /"3 > / :& C@ 2
.
:.‫ا‬H:I‫
ت ا‬%'/‫ ا‬9-1
: ‫\ا? ا‬J‫] ا‬H"IH ^T9 ‫[ ا‬47
#" #3&
3 #$ " /A *5 D > Q : # •
./"
$
'&1 " A *5 :System Effectiveness '
•
.A #"$
: (ERP) Enterprise Resource Planning System ' •
3 8 " &Q !*7&$ /5 / 8$ /7
3 /C %1 +$ /" %" , 2 !%1 85 +$

3
/5 !7 /" *2 :%. !/A /1 ; %

/A
3 / 8" !C7 85@ *2 !/ *2 !7
/7 :&
!/3 /A *5 77 '# /A
.= E / % +$
% / " % /# : System Quality ' (3 •
. D /$ *$ !/$" / /$ 85 A 0
!# V 85 !8$ /5 :Information Quality ) 5 (3 •
D? ) $ !-, #, + # !# /# /5. /$
9
/ *$ A / *$ 8 #? 8" '0
. /0 /"o 8" 8 2 2
!A 8$ , : user satisfaction ; •
8$ A
E" f !A % , !/ 8$
. D
/ %; :Organizational Performance Excellence •
3 ; ; 2 !/$ /" #C 0 +
91 /5 " %@ D5 !#3& 2 %0
./" 8" *9; !

Q " /" 8A /.@. 7
/ /" 8" *5 :Internal Process Efficiency ) 5 ( # •
s; /" *$ /$(

3 = / # 7

. /" '"t
:Organizational Learning & Growth '5 •
.1 % =t / # V$

/
10
A3
‫ا ا‬
JK
@‫ي وارا)
ت ا‬H26‫
ر ا‬MI‫ا‬
" 4 1A2
) 2A2
5 ) 1A2A2
3 ) 2A2A2
) & 3A2

11
" 4 1A2
4 ) 5 '
. ; l ( M. Lynne Markus, & Sheryl Cornelis Tanis,2000)
85
3 ; # %3 /2 8" A 8A c@ *, " #
#; %$ 1 #5 /( 8" A /"3 /0 " D;
f &
3 c 81 & /;" :? /( 8" A /"3
:/B 8; %
! /A / A :-
!/"; #; : -.
!%; /( 8" A C0 :-..
/( 8" A /"3 >5 :-
8" *$ •
A *$ •
, •
.%; /( 8" A /& :-

" D? !"'# 7$( -, #, + %

8 %;" : D? A '
+ %; % # !/ 85@ -, #, + 5 0 97$
. (2005!
" ) / '& sF -, #,
12
0 ! 8" /$ /A c" /( 8Q - ? V
.Q /A /C
3
89$( +C5
& 8" /$ /A
3 /"
/, *3 @ 9 + 8" @.3 ! #3& &

3
/A
3 /C$2 8" #$ %. V +3 / / 8" 8
/A1 :& '# !#$ # /$ 8 V$ 8" :& f 3
/A

3 8" \ 89$( c" / / 2 %
8
3 g, &
" & %1 /A %" D"
%01 *2 ! *2 !8, !83) % / _4 (O'brien, 1991)
7 /"" ! ( /( 8; ! /7 , 1 *2 ! 8
+ (%01 /0 ! 7 *2 !8 !8 *2) %
% / ! ( ; *2 !+ *2 ! *2) %
! ) %
C$( + +0 ! (
, V 8)
.(' , ! x
/A , x ERP /A /A ? % c
2 .( / / ) *? 8" /$
3 #" ( ) /$2 *? 8" 2 /; & *(
' 2 (Garg,2010) #$ :&7 & , 8 /#$
0" /"5 /5 / 8$ /7 #? /A Kennerely
/"" * \9 /A

3 /C 'CA" /" %" , 85 >;
! " Q / / C7 85@ *2 7 /5 7
/A" /3 * 77 2 '# / /A1 :& 8Eo0
13
85 8" c" 3! /& /5 %. / C0 8 8"
.(Kennerely&Neely,2001) 7 &l V
8"" 8Q %

5 P#
& /A ? % /." c
*? *2 , 89$( c" ",; / D3 #0
. #$ &&7 & ,
# 'C#
&; / /? /"; #; #

3 * . "
f ' /" -7$ !/"; g" 0 *9; g" 0 7
.c" . #$ # %0

8$ & 2 3
8A 9 >5
3 /1 > /"; *9; % .1
.(Elliott & Strking, 1998) .&7$

8
2 &$ 7@ !% 8A / " 0 & /& l .2
.(Senn,1998) ' %" "5 l @ 0 #
% *9; "

3 '& A 8$ /"; " .3
Elliott & Starking, ) (Goyal, 1998) .(PC) 8$
.(1998
#; h3 . /"; >5

3 / 8 Q Q *9; .4
.(Robbins, 1990) *9; #; + /";
2 /"; #; /1 " . V #$ ; l
c
3 V D" ; /";" ' $ D 8#A #. # PC
14
V0 . V$ * /A &A *&A /";
8$ #? /"; Goyal 'Eo 2 !(Robbins, 1990) # #; " ;
/0 9 , @3 A $ V %.
A
i '
3 ! (Goyal,1998) 8$ *$ >
& /l PC
" A /"3 /$ h3 '&1 #
/$ #? /";"
. (OZ,2000) =1 A %,3 8$ D /$ '& D
: / ) 5 '
& /"; % " / *0 ( %@ #; 2 .
% " #, / * 0 # * 8; &; %$
.. " " B D,
8" A D # = " # " /( 8" A /"3 83 3
.( Hamilton & Chervaney, 1981 )" /A 8F '&1

3 /(
/( 8" A * >" #? -, /( 8" A /"3 83Eo
% +0 /# %#

3 #
/" C0 8$ "
. (2005!
" ) 8$ :& ; ,
3 " /( 8" A /"3 '

3 Burns & Madey % ;
8" A /"3 h3 /A A /#$ 3 ;" / /A" / ##;
/#$ -" '"

3 #
+3 C 8" 0 %@ /(
C0 8" 3 " A c *5 # " # A 5 ; A
.( Burns & Madey,2001) %3

3 # /
15
j > /"; ' (Elliott & Straking, 1998) D; (
3
* , A #"$ $

/F Dl A '& D
#
8 A" /3, / A 9 % /& 2 #
3 V)
./( 8" A $ /# 8 Q ; /A % A
2 # Goyal ' & /( 8" A /"; 5 +1 '
A & /"; /.@. %@ /( 8" A /"3 #;
8$ j 2 " $ A *5 " 2 * ./; *
&
8$ + A 8$ / c " 8" 8" 'CA
8$ 85 /5 /F0

3 , * %. #"$ 8$

.(Goyal, 1998).A
" 8 ' c" ? 8$ #h3 /"; ' " /. j@
/.
A % ; /5 8$ *$ # %
./ %@
"0; % 1 :& 8
81 s
0 # / ) 5 ' ?: 1
/$ 3 " D3&

3 /( 8" A $ 2
/0 8" 3 %@ D ; 8$ j D

C0
.-@3 -2 8" A D"$ . /"
- /. 8$ %; / 8" A C0

+ %@
2 V) s ?$ 3 !C0 c" #, # . %
3 #2
8" 8$ C0 %; /( 8" A C0
0 7 & # %0 /# # #5 # f

16
/ C0 c" 2 B #, V&

3 . (Bryson, 1990)
(Thierauf, 1984)

3 c #A /( 8" A % ,
'
3 Burns & Madey % ; . %; /( 8" A C0
3 ;" / /A" / ##; 3 " /( 8" A /"3
C 8" 0 %@ /( 8" A /"3 h3 /A A /#$
# " # A 5 ; A /#$ -" '"
3 #
+3
Burns )%3

3 # / C0 8" 3 " A c *5
.( & Madey,2001
: 4 ) 5 '

P *
m/"; >5 #@

1 > m- /"; c" >5 %&
%C /$ " . V) #$ ; / /"C1 /$(
3
: (2005!
" )
B %. # #. PC
3 "$ 8#A
/1
8902 82 & /( 8" A /"3

3 - .1 % 2 .
h3 D" . A & 8$

8" *$ > ;
*$ !; 8$ > 3 " V$ /( 8" A /"3
.A /$ 8"
Delon & Mclean, ) / ( Delon & Mclean, 1992) % / .V
> #

3 . A - -7 x #, .(2003
. /( 8" A /"3
> /2

3 = >
3 / /. h3 D"
/A /"3 + " ? A 8$ % *$ ; /5

17
. V) A ; c /( 8" /A j ? /Q
/"3 > > 8$ *$ A !; /5 8F "
'@ " 8;0 C0 A 2 /3,( ! /( 8" A
; #"
(8") A 8$ /#
3 V0 ##$ #
8F /. /5 2 -/3,2 !#$ = " " 51 Dh3 .
1 :& " 8;

/ 8 " j@ /$ 8
/
./( 8" /A /"3 >
: 5# ) 5 ?: 1 ) 5 (3
8"
& 0 c" & ) 2 !* 0 8" A l "
3 5 & 8" 3 & A +, /F 1 c !A 8$ %.
#? (Eldon,1997)#3 8" !"#$C 1 " 2" % +
/ . i '

3 8, j,
&; C"
"# C@ V = % # 8 "

& 8" (Alter, 1999)
q :
" = /"; + c
. (Goyal 1998) '&1 A 8$ /"; " q1
/"3 *7 8" 3 /A

3 8" A '# q2
f h3 c (Gallier, 1999) 8

3 /A % *9;
/"3 >
3 #l /A % f V" & /"; 7 8" A
. /A 8 " A
18
V" c h3 !- ;0 % -Q; - 3 2 A " " q3

3 /# V$ ? A #$
8" C0 " '
. (Angell,1991) 8" A /"3 *9;
8" A * > " #? " /( 8" A /"3 83 q4
+0 /# %#
3 #
/" C0 8$ " /(
. (Eldon,1997) " 8$ :& ; , %
> > 8" *$ " (Delon&Mclean,1992) ; q5
8" /A /"3

3 -$ #.
/A1 /"3
./(
‫` ا ?> ا‬IG ‫ ا‬-N‫ت آ‬4L ‫( \دة ا‬Wen-Hsien Tsai,2010) q6
.>$U ‫ارد ا‬4 P8QH 2 ‫ أ‬L! ]9 ‫س‬7

V" ! - 3 2 8" A " ? % /."
/3
3 /# V$ ? A #$
) 5 ?: 1 " '
. /"

3 #"
A
8" 2 . s 3 8"

3 *$" 8 C0 c&
(Anthoney, Perrewe, Kacmar 1999) q:

" '0 *$
/5 #"$ /;" 8" /$ ? / s;

: /5 •
. #"
. # : / /&$ •
/" *0 9 2 + D"$ #$ V" %$" #". # : / •
. /"
19
. ##3 %# /"# / : *9 •
. * / #; 8" : ( •
/"0 !/5!85 '0 *$ 8" C0 ? (Goyal, 1998 ) =
!/, l !% , !-3,2 -C % !/; !/. !j,
./C. !,
!% '0 V$ *$ 8" ? (Delon&Mclean,2003) =
./5 !/;" !, !/5 !/ !/"0 /5. ! #; /#
* 8;0 +, " ; 5 / 8

3 . ? /. P
85 *9 /#; / /5 %. / *$ 8 8""
. , j, /"0 /.
#" +$
8;0 " :& #
3 8 /. h3 " \9
./
3 8" *$ # > . V"l
8" '0
& 8" *$
C$( #; +, /." &
/"0 /. 85 *9 /#; / /5 %. C0
. , j,
' (3
D3&1 D = /3 / 8" A > /"; 8
q: .(Atiyyah,1989)
" " A /"; /5@ /.
8" A
. % #, /( 8" A /"3 >5 /& .1
#
3 /( 8" A /"3 2 /(
20
A *$ " g, Q " %0" /# :&
7
. D :Q D5 /( 8"
" A *5 /"; Q 'A & /"; >5 g" 0 2 .2
A /"3 2 9,

3 % D" .( Goyal,1998) " D3&
" D3& " /( 8" A *5

& " /( 8"
/A /"3 > ? A *$ %2 D

3 ( Tsai,2010) .3
$ !A /$ 85 A /5) > "
. A *$ > (8@
8" A D # = " # " /( 8" A /"3 83 .4
#
/$ /A 8F '&1
3 /(
D " A /"3 /$ h3 '&1
8" A /"3 #; Goyal ' 2 A 2 ! (Oz,2000)'&
*
& A & /"; /.@. %@ D3 5 D =3 /(
8$ j 2 " $ A *5 " 2 * 2 ./;
+ A 8$ / c " 8" 8" 'CA
85 /5 /F0

3 , * %. #"$ 8$
8$
2 /" * 2 3 /; . A 8$
/$ & 3 !( /A 8" A

3 . /
31 /C /$ A /C

3 8F %@ A *5 #
A %
/$ # " /; '
3 A ;
. (Goyal, 1998) ; /C

3 8F 3 " #
21
A c & %E; A ? x : " \9
'CA 8$ j 2 " -5 ! #"$ $ '# /F
/A #; V"0 " D : > .#"$ o0
0
5 P#
" A & A Dh3
" * c"

Dh3 8" c" ",; 8 D3 #0 /
3 (Tsai,2010) c 77 .'&1 8F 8" 'CA 8$ j 2
*$ > 2 /A /"3 >

3 f
D
. (Tsai,2010) A /"3 > *? A
!/# %; / 8" A 7 (Palanisamy & Sushil, 2001)
% A % V #3 A ; " %#
&
/ , 7 ! D :$ '&1 . A" %.1
c V !%; /( 8" A

3 &3 V$ C0 & =2
/ 8" A /C # 7

/, / 8F
V$ !8 0 /$ /3

3 8." /$ /$ /"
! D"3 " /A3" /" 8 /C7$ * 8F 8@ 9$2 D
/" " A *5 2 /0 :& t3 ! / C0 c" 2 ',t
& 8$ 2 ; . /" *0 !D" ; 8$
! #? /"; 8 D /" 8# %1 2

3 A
. /"3
3 *.Q % & 85 % h3 C0 c" -/3,2
$ % ; :0 h3 V 85

3 2 3
? @3 #2 /$ /" 8" %0 "
22
/$ 85 ! %; /( 8" A /# C0 :&
A &3 85 2 ; 8" V" * A" /";
j , /. % %@ .; #@ /( 8"
? = #h3 = /

3 /A /A1 ;
*5 2 A c *7 C0 c" A *0
. 8" PC *95 " 8( " /$ j 2 " :&
. / 8
A *$ #;

C$( #; +, ? /." Dh3 " \9
% !/ !" % /# %. C0 A '0 ?
. *$ !+ /$ 85 !A 0
; 'C#
C0 A h3 A 8" *$ % A V1

3 :@ D
(8") A 8$ /#

3 V0 ##$ # '@ " 8;0
, 2 ! #$ = " " 51 D3 . ; #"

8" D$ 3 A &

/$
& 8"
.(2005!
" )
8902 82 & /( 8" A /"3

3 - .1 % 2
8" A /"3 h3 D" . (Palanisamy & sushill, 2001,) ;
. ; 8$ > 3 " V$ /(
8" A /"3 #; 2 /( 8" A /"; Goyal' q
' /; ( *

& A & /"; /.@. %@ /(
23
/C
3 8F 3 " # A %
/$ # " 00 /;
.( Goyal, 1998) ;
; -
, /A $ % ; /
% V" 2 /A $ = > /# > 8"
. (Harris & Weistroffer,2009); /

3 ? ; , /5
/
3 & /( 8" A $
3 $2 . ; / 2
.(Paulus, Kwok, & Hock, 2005).
; P
/A ; , > #;

3 8. 8 l "
/A ; ,

3 85
%1 :& % 2 /( 8"
/A ; , > * #"$

3 / :& 8 5 2003 /
3 &
? / c" P , c -0 12 / (EUCS)
/A ,

0 &
& A % = %
/A ; , #3 %$ .(Torkzadeh,2003) /Q
28 / * " / % (Calisir & Calisir,2004) % 5
# " /1 /#$ C0 > / " & -0
, * V /$ , " /"5 , % , / ,/3 , A *5
&
& C3 " /"5 ? / 80" 5 ! :C3 /#
8 ( Zviran et al.,2005) . ! /A ; , >
/A *C C; + , /5@ :2

3 " C0
24
! " = !

;A ! #2

/; *C
&
C3 / 8"0 >$ 8" /A

3 D !
! /A ,

3 V" /A 2
/A * !) C0 (Holsapple et al. ,2006) c
/A /7) /A /5 0 + (

" = !8"
2 >;

3 A $ > 8 (A # !A /3 !
j !j 3) > %@ A $ = > ; ,
# A /3 2 8 :& 80" 5 ( / /3 !P
F c" "" /A ; , , +
$2 % /
/A () ; , /A P j , "
Wu and Wang 5 ! & j 3 , F c" "
,j 3) > " /A ; , > * ( ,2006)
. ( D ; /3 , /A P /7
c " \9 ! /A ; , > j " 9
3 #. ‫( و ا‬Longinidis,2008) ‫ > ا درا‬/.
q:
" /A , > > :@ *;
. /A + ' q1
. /A %5 8" q2
. 8" $ *C + %; q3

25
D? /Q /A ,

C$( #; /l0 /." D" \9
/"
3 ; / , % 8F /A1 c" / ,
. 8" $ *C + % , /Q /A %5
:0 # ) 5 ' - : .
:
%@ /&1 c" s
0 + / ) 5 ' #.1
/A
3 / 8" A /;A %.
: (o'brain,2000)

? #? /A $ /, /#

/A
3 /C /;A / .
..... !/ !/ !/
.#;" %1 ;

3 /
C 97$ .V
/"3 85 +$ " 8""

C .8
.7 , 8 / % x /"F *9;
3 .Q # % .f
. /3 *7 /A g /3 8 8$

3 # 0 .x
3 "3 # '@ " 8A

3 %; /( 8" A
.(Obrien,2000p)
& /C /.@. / /;A , 9,
. /A 8" .
.# /A
" .V
./3 *7 /A /$2 .x

26
4
‫ ا‬P‫دار‬I‫
ت ا‬8#'<‫
م ا‬23 ‫أهاف‬.2
&
'& 9; @3 /( 8" A /&
/" 8" /;" 8 /$ j 7

# 2 A
% D;A %@ %; / 8" A , /" /"; *9;
.(Goyal,1998) / '& 2 #

/A
./, 8 3 /" 8" /A

3 +5 = % 7 .
# % D

3 / 8" " #"0 8" /;0 .V
. /.
.#; /# '0

8" 3 .8
.C@ 8" 3 .f
. 3 (/.)/ 8" .x
.#" 8" 8 %" % .
. #
8 % *( .
4
‫ ا‬P‫دار‬Q‫
ت ا‬8#'<‫
م ا‬23 ‫ا‬#5.3
%@ /A #" %0
/ %; /( 8" A C3
'&6 D D / 1 'CA A c 5 %3 8" A #@
"
/( 8" A C3 2 (Goyal,1998) 2 ;i 8

:
B
.g0 % " g0 85

3 /0 8" .1
8" 3
3 A .2
.# 5 /5 /& 72 :$ 8" ' .3

27
.# V %$ %(

3 #$ 8" /;0 .4
./ " A 9 .5
.D#3 %# % 8" 3 .6
.8" 8 %" /;" % .7
./A '&1 #5@ 2 /Q %$ /2 .8
./"3 *9; /A *5 " * .9
. "" #3 / .10
.; , *7 .11
." /A % /0 85@ .12
.C .13
:C3 D3& D;A /( 8" A 1 / 8
:/ /.
1 'CA '&1 %

3 %; / 8" A /& $ .1
./A" /( 8" A # #

C;
/A 9 &; /

3 %; /( 8" A /& " .2
/, 8" 3 #3 %3 /2 8" A $ &
. D$ #3& /A % 8&$ /7@

!7 /F c

#3 !
3 # f /F 8A" 2
!*( %$
3 " " 1 %1 %l & 7 l 3
28
#,3 / % !8A / 8 7 91 %
81 '&1 /
3 D" 7 g0 2 !/$ = 'A
.*F /3 /C

3 # 2 8A

$5
3 l 3 B '" & ( & D? 7 'E
.( #$ *; /$ %@ /5 / #3
.
3 3 %,31 !/3 *7 c &
. ( ( / // /( / *$ / /;" )

$( 91
$ & 2 %0) " ! /)A *5 ! )A

" D -, '
.(2009!i *3 )

/1 1 s 3 D? V = c >;
3
". 31 V : %. %1 8A

3 7 8 #
%
/C@ /A % ! /A
3 =$ .1 / 8$
" 7;

A %@ D "

" /A *5 D?

Q 91 (Peterson, et al, 2003) 'E 5
".# / #3& + /l 8$ x2 !*9; &
9,
3 /A % x /" /A D?" (2000!i ) D3
"./$ /" #C 0 + #";

29
#C + %;
3 /A *5 =
Q 91 ; ; @
/" #" *9; /;" & " #0 " 3 c !/$ /"
.+$ %5 /" 8$ x2
" #"5 %1 /A * -" D 91 ( Eccles, 1991)
91 2 (Robins & Wireman, 1995) % & + ; !#3&
h3 !'@ & l " . " 1 /" #3& " /A *5 " D
.#3&
3 /A D $ %@ 91 . V"l
@ ( 2004!
;5 ) 3 ! *
Q 91 #;
:
& 91 #; /.@. 2 (Venkatraman and Ramanjam, 1986)
/ %. / 8 Q " 7 !96 , #; & :
.
#3 c !
"F 91
91 & +$ : >%
. 8 " %0 '# / " %,3

3 *9; ',
*$ 8 *$ //$ P ! /5 /0 %. 8 Q " & 7
. /
= & !

Q 96 - .1 & : #
.#3&1 /A
-. / & 8 $ . !8A

3 91 /& " %"
8A
!/0 *0 /( % / *0 *( % V %5
%$ &
3 D& !/$( *( 7 * /& 91 %1
( Empirical ) -$ ( Theoretical ) -A /C /.@. %@ 5

30
2 !/$( *( 7 91 %. /A / 3 .( Managerial ) -2

, % 9 91 8 , " /( 8" +$
/ /$ -7 - %. 91 2 c

3 V +$ ! %
/& h3 /$ / ( Venkatraman & Ramanujam, 1986 ) *( %5
91 /$( *( f 8 V"l %@ #A 91
!(Ginsberg & Venkatraman, 1985 ) # /$ 8" /;" 8$(
82 %5 7 &( $ %@ /, #A #h3 /( /&1
) 91 PC " - 8A :&

3 $
8 !D$C 91 8A
. ( Hofer, 1980
/ 8A@ 8" +$ * " D?

Q > (2002 !
) '
2 3 !\ \ 8 9 1 & ! D5 j,
5
3 ; 8" # P /A /" D? " ' ". /$ >

3 % ; $ = /3 2 /" '# ! / /5 " 02
? * '&1 ', * c ! '&1
"./ *0
* +
"; 91 / '# 91 /" ? (2000!$)
*3
3 83@ 83 ' " !/Q /$2 /
3 -
./0 89$( g
+, + /. h3 ! 91 7 #; 8; " \9

3 #$ = >5 " /A * D?
Q 91 7
C$( #;
.#3&
31
P * 6
Certo & peter, ) #3 !#5 91 8 $ A 8#$
#;0 g0 V0 '& 2 A ! ( 1995,Freeman, 1984
> 3 #@

A 91 >5 /A "
F /C 9 8 $
8 $
3 i V " ! D / ' D". %$ % C@
!#" 7

91 8 $ #
# #. 8" 91
%.
91 :$ #;"3 > 9 8 $ 8A s 82 #
9 8 $ ( venkatraman &Ramanuiam, 1986) % ! # / 8
!
" 91 !
91
3 %. ! *
3 %
3 !D, 91 > f % 8 Q > , ! /A /";
.91 > 8 Q > D, ! :& % g,

"
9 . V c

91 :
'"
3
" +5 , 91 8"
3 /A / 8 ,
$ = >

91 ? (lynch, 2000)= .%1 8A
sE V"
=
96 8A .8A
/& " ?

3 c 2 V) s V& . " & &$
./A &1 '# :E 2 c !

91
8 Q #
91 8 Q ( Harrison & john, 1998)
! /# /$2 Eo !
913 !/A"
" %" /"
3 /
*5 : Q @,3 ! /A

3
" 91
3 # "
2 2 ./$ /C % " 3

91 /& " Q /"
32
; + #"

3 /$ " *5 . !+;
91 8 /A
/ ! g0 V0 %5 F, s # !*$ /C 8#
.
91

8A &F
3 7 # , !

91
3 8A &l " /A ; 2
; 91 2 2 : 7 c 77 @ @ 3B g; !
. (Hunt & Morgan,1995) * /" /#$ ;

7
!96 / 8 Q >" + @ C c& A@
* '& @. g !96 / 8 Q > \/]
/ >" $ 5 2 \ ./ -3& C
!/A" =
/A %. !
"
> & ! /A 9 /$2 *0 3
1 PC 2 2 ! /"F # /A /$2 $ > /0@ *
#$C # /A 8$ 2 * 3 85

. (Vecchio,1995) /C@ l !*$
"
91 %. : ( 5) ^
$ / 8 Q 2 /3,(3 !8A

3 %1 91 /"
P / !*$ 8$ ! /5 /0 91

3 /"F 8 Q > "
=
> &l !/$( ! / /" /"3 !/ (/)
/;" *0 * #A /"F > 91 > , 2 ./A 8" 9
(VenKatraman & ) D ' / 8 Q + 96
.Ramanim,1986
33
91
3 3 / V " (Macmenamin,1999) =
>
3 V"1 & 77 V$ ! /A % /" l /Q

!D$ & , ./A

3 %3 91 >5 A 9 / l 9 >
. Dh3 !/A" %

" 91 & 2 D? (EIIsworth,1983)
(Kaplan & Norton,1992) ‫م‬-GI‫ و‬./ /" 8& 7 $ %
‫( إ‬Balanced Scorecard) V ' %@

"
91 > %
c" /5 77 ! 91 PC g0;

/ > /5 :& ,
/ !/" 8" !9@ % /" > / 8 Q >
? $ ./A"

" 91 77 f /A
3 j(
7 >5 8F /A
3 j( /" 8" > " 8 /.
. # +$
3
Q 91
91 % 1 +1 #; /A /"; %. : #
(Cameron& = .
"
91 % > D
3 % %
/ D D&; & " V D Whetten,1993)
/A /$( *( f %$

3 /0 ! /( 8 $ '"
3 91
# / ' 1 8$ /A '&6 / / D" A /A
" % !/A
3 g0 V0 '& /A /";
F 2 !&
/E; /A1 /7 91 85 t . ' 1 '" '&1 :& >5
Et
! (2009!
)
D E V
A 91 >5
3 /
. 8Q 9 >5

3 *$
34
" ) 7 91 /5 " /. 85 &
3
. = / /Q 9 7 > (/" 8" *9; !

Q
*
> C #. /$ % / ; A V0 2005 %"
. * 8C02 #Q 9 % /50 8 8" &7 /
8 %1 / ; %7 -Q
. % PC # >

3 -l % ;
/$2
>
/ F B / l / 8A h3 c
. (2009!
) 91 #
(Dilla & Steinbart,2002) . = ! 8 c" 9,
3
3 !91 >5 /$# " /&$ 8@ %2 *, (Kaplan&Norton,2001)
!/05 8 51 9

3 &1 0
& / 8 Q 8
. A 3 % , g0 *$ 8" "# c2 7 +
.
+ /7 91 >5 /5 (Kaplan&Norton,2001) . s 5 !&
9@ % " = / V$ V$ 2 % 91 >5 2
. " 8""

" %F
91 > 05

3 @. /7 91 >5 /5 5 9 >C +3
‫( و‬Hoque et al.,2001) ‫( و‬Dater et al.,2001) . 5 /
(Norreklit,2000)
35
+ %" g"0 / / 0 %$1 " / > 2
/ / *$ % /" /$( 8" %&$ %
.% , f
l / PC > 91 > g, > 2 /$ 8A 8$
/
* / " 8 0 91 '& +,

3 D *;@
.'&1 /" P / / F ? "
% 8 8 f@. %
3 ! 1992
3 Kaplan & Norton % 5
( HBR) Harvard Business Review /"$

3 /7 91 >5 /5 j,
2 /$( /$ (BSC) Balanced Scorecard ) /7 91 >5 /5
%3
.( Kaplan&Norton ,1992 , 1993 , 1996a,1996b )

$ A " #? ” Balanced Scorecard” /7 91 >5 /5 '
/5 D$ 91 / > " , /$( / >
/" 8" 7 D$ % !

"
96 /7 91 >5
2 /A /$( /5 /$ g, %@ D$ "
. ( Kaplan , Norton ,1996) /" > '&
96 > % " #$2 /A / % /$ / "
&
. ( Horngren, foster, Datar,2000)#$2 % 7

36
/Q
& ,
"3 % 2 /$( /$ " #; " #? '

> A
$" /$ % #$2 /A
. 8$@ / /$ 8 $

3 91 >5 '& +, "
* * % 7 " /; " /7 91 >5 /5 %
l / > % 0 = 7 %1 /$2 >
Kaplan )
$
" 91 V$ /$ / ( 8 Q /
>" A 3 8 ) 2 A

& /7 91 >5 /5 (&Norton,2001
/F 7 , % 2 #$ #$2 #Q g, 8A (
2 /3,2 /$ PC /" %1 8" ¢% % /
$ 2 c % 2 , /F" /C PC
$ 91
./A"
1 c :E
#? &A /#$ /7 91 >5 /5 ' /. + " \9
D$C +5 ; +5 % 2 /A" /$( / /$ /A /
! /A # s 5
8 /#$ ; %@F C

.D +$
3 /A c" 91 = 9 + #
)
& / / " /A A /#$ /5 " /1 *;
/"F /5 0 c ( " , /" 8" , C7 ,

.%1 /$2 = 0 =

3
./ %F 8" /$( Q /7 91 >5 /5
?

0 '#
3 /$ /1 V :& " /A 7 2
" 7 f /7 91 >5 /5 #; c , D$ /5
37
f 9‫ ر‬، -e ‫ أ\_ ا‬34 ‫ أن "_ ا م‬cI ‫ذا‬4 ‫ ( ! أي‬F ! ! >1 ) /.@.
A /A
& ! l -9 4 ‫!ل‬5‫ ا‬g ‫ ا‬R5‫] ا‬2I
./ l > /1 / V " 3 > @

: (1q2) 5 % /1 /7 91 >5 /5 A *3 g,
<K‫
ور ار‬%‫ل ا‬VF ?8 3‫از‬#$‫
س اداء ا‬.
/K ‫
م‬23 ?.P (1-2)‫ا! ر‬
.@.H‫ا‬
(Kaplan , 2002) :0
(Internal Business Process Perspective) ) 5 &
7 LQ9 3?9V ‫=ر ا‬4 34 _‫ز آ‬VH ‫ ا‬L<‫ا‬- ‫ت ا‬L ‫ ا‬L! ‫ا ا =ر‬h‫ ه‬V‫آ‬I
'&1 '
8" . /A % *7
C9VL
38
( C7 9,( - /" 8" 91 83 /$ "
Foster , Datar , Horngren , 2000 )
C / /2 '0 )

& /" 8" 9 /5 / > &
.( 8" A / , 7@ 85 % ! /"
j j %3 !# /" 8" 9 *9; /A *9; 2 %
!/ 8$ 2 8@ :& % 2 '# /" $ 8$ 8@
8$ 05? &; / 8" /&? /A " j5 @3

./"; *9;

3 /3 *7 /A

8 /$ /" 8" %.
" *( &

/" 8" 2 2 (Kaplan&Atkinson, 1998 )
!:, " %0

% 2 / %02 1 c !>C % 9@

8;0 V / /"" / 2 x D A; DC
3 / h3 c !/ + % /$ /5 D

! c"#" j (
.(Kaplan & Norton, 1996) % 2 % /" 8" 9
(Learning and Growth Perspective ) '5 &
1 & =

3 $ " #5 /A" " ,
, 31 D$ 2 & '# ,9"
7 8$ #3 /3 * 3 > /A V$ . 9"
.( Olve , Roy, Wetter, 2000 , 85

3 7" /5 " -, /,
)
39
'0 , f '0)

& " /5 / >
, /" / f , f 8 , 8" A
.7 , Q , / /7 + %0 , f

3 .
8A
3 - . /
& :& ? D &
/3,2 -@. 3 , #" / V c = /A +
. +$ /C f =
) 2A2
5 ) 1A2A2
qC*R 4 ) 5 ( # " 5 (2005)
) 5 3
4 )& ' * " C3 "4
" 5
¤#5@ /¤( 8¤" /A *9; = ' 2 / 83&
8¤$
3 /( 8 5 9Q A /#$ ( 91 =
¤ +¤$ 3 (410) 8 / " / 8$ 2 ./ /1
./ /1 8$

3 /( 8
3 51 9Q
/¤ /1 8$

3 /( 8" /A / PC 8#A 5
D /5@ $ PC 8#A .8 $ % *9; % = " 89$
¤3 ( 91 = /( 8" /A *9; = C02 / /$2
.8$ :&

40
(! 3q

( # P * 5 " 5 .(2006) ) 1 &
C3 #&1 )

C*R %
."
¤3 / *2 8$ /3 *9; " ' 2 / 83&
¤ /

3 /". /1 /;0 8Q
(21) ¤ / +$ E 2 .

Q 91 #5@ " V " 9
¤#3 "¤

8Q
& /;0 8Q (4) # !/;0 /Q
..?3 @ (50)
¤ ¤ /¤3 *9; /$2 /5@ $ 2 / PC 8
*9¤; ¤ /$2 /5@ $ !

Q #C /1 /;0 8Q
3 /
!
¤Q ¤#C /1 /;0 8Q
3 " 9 8$ /3
¤#C "¤ V¤ 8$ /3 *9; /$2 /5@ $ 2 /3,(
.
Q

&
) 5 3 " 5 (2007 )
."
/Q 9 /"3

3 8" $ 2 / :& 83&
¤$ +¤5 " '5 %@ 2005q1996 *; %@ /1 *
!2005q1996 8 %@ #3 F * /Q

3 / 8"
.91 *9; 8" $ /5@ / '

41
¤3 /A *5 = D?
Q 91 / D %@ f '
*9¤; /;" & " #0 " 3 c !/$ /" #C + %;
.+$ %5 /" 8$ x2 /" #"
'¤ %5 D" * 8Q 9 ? f P
/ . 8 Q 2 j$ V" c #$ /Q %
>¤5 8¤ Q /& -, P !/Q"

" 91 " #@
.
Q 91 > /;
( q q q q 'C# " 5 (2007 ) ( %
."' =, 7 3 '*!

91 #; V$ "52

3 * /3 /$ ' 2 / 83&
/ *
" %&Q >$ 8F /3 c" .? /$ !7
Q
9¤,
¤3 *¤ c¤C 8$ 9,
3
x . !% +5
/ (218) / / 8 5 ./. /( 8&$
8¤ ¤ ¤ (181) ! 3 51 9Q !( ;
.( 2006/2005)
" V$ "52
3 >
¤#; V$ "52

3 * /3 /$ 2 / PC 8
91 ¤#; ¤? " 3 # /$ " !/ 8 7
Q 91
/$¤ 8 3 !

$ *2 8 7
Q
./3; /9 /( 8 " #

42
q )! 'q 9q 1q " 5 (2008)
."5 5
'5
82 9 ¤ 0 9

3 %. >C % 7$2 2 / 83&
¤Q 91 +5 " ' 2 / 8 !/"
3 " /
#" %
/C !/ / /"
3 " / 8(
¤5 !
""
;0 P# / sl1 .91 0
> /C& 9, !- (42) & " / / +$
¤5 .-¤ -¤ (14) & " / *7

C !-, (32) &
82 9 ¤ ¤ 0 9

3 %. >C % 7$2 2 / 8"0
8¤ Q /¤; /C /$ " % /"

3 " /
./;
q 6 9 3 2 ( 05 3 6& " (2008 ) "
."

/A /A /$ $ % 2 / 83&
¤ g, /" 8 0 8

"F / " / :& 9$2 %@
. /A /A 8 '" D$

/1 8
/ ¤ /$2 $ ) %. /A % % c& D 2 f P
*( 7¤ ¤ !F *2 5 ! ( ERP ) /A + *$ % 89$2
c¤&
¤ ¤ !C# 9 !+ *2 5 !"
43
C¤ /" $ %. /A x *.Q %
./A /A 7
- C
5 (! ) *R5 " 5 (2008 ) (
." 5 '5 (

– 2
*7C$
3 8 /3 *2 8" /5@ ' 2 / 83&
7¤
!/3 8$ ) /3;
Q 91 7
. c"
!7 ! ! ) /3 *2 8" !(/$ /" 8 0 !
3
!/1
" *7
3
Q 91 7 " /5@ :& . ( !+7
¤ / sl1 .> % f

Q 91
3 f
3 83&
¤2 /¤ 80" 5 .'A (300) & ¥" ;A / " / +7
7¤ /¤3 *2 8" /3 *2 8" /C02 / 8 /5@ $
.
Q 91
q ' 6 9 3

[3& 05 " 5 (2010) &
." Baan LN ' ) 1 ) % 2
#
/ 8
3 * % & 2 / :& 83&
* /5; / :& 8" ,.ERP % % 3 $

3 .1
.A & % 3 $ % / /$ 8"

A +3
8¤" +$ /
3 8 " /. A /#$ +3 83
%¤ / /5

!/7 8" * # A
3 /
.A &
8" %
:
3 0 #? A 83
44
./ /;"q1
.%90 " 7 / % ; /q2
%¤ /5@ $ T-test % PC %" / 8"0 5
¤ %@¤ $ .A $ / /A j !/
.&1
& /A % x
q
q- q4 ) q*R " 5 (2010 ) 1 3
"
& !f@. #" *( 85@ % 2 ' 2 / 83&
%¤ :& /5@ !/. /" !/" /" !/" %5 /"
¤ /¤ (36) 8 / " / 8$ f .

Q 91 " &.
./ 6 "3

3 /$ / /& 8
*( 8¤5@ /C02 / 8 /5@ $ 2 / PC 8 5
/¤ 8 /¤5 /5@ $ 2 8

3 !
Q 91 /" /" %5
.
Q 91 /. *( 85@ /C02
q: 5 2 (]% 6 P * " 5 (2011) )
1q ) % 2 A5 1 ) %
/ 2
."5 1
3
) 8¤Q ¤ /A = . 2 / 83&
/¤ /&¤ /0¤ 8 ¤ = . " C " (ERP
8¤7 / 0 /Q /A = > !/
/7@ 8 8$ !/ /0

3 ## /$ /0 8 "
45
¤$ / 8 .(2010) 8 :& * / 8
" C " /$ /1 D /Q /A = .
.
/ /$ /0 8
3 .
.6:‫ ارا)
ت ا‬2-2-2
"The Impact of Information ‫ان‬#YYY6<K (Clemmons, 2005 ) YYY)‫درا‬

Technology on Organizations: A Study of Enterprise Resource
Planning System Influences on Job Design and Organizational
Culture"
/¤C C0¤ /5 /;A C0 /5@ ' 2 / 83&
8" A $ j " 8" A % %5 8" $
/¤ 8¤$ 2 ./A A /A /A? D2
. A
3 @ (130) 8 / "
¤0 %2 " 8" /A A 2 / PC 8 5
¤ /¤;A 0 C0 2 " 0 F

3 8# % /C
3 *$
8"¤
3 # /A A ; 2 80" !/A /3.
./;A C0 /A /3.
"Organizational q 5 (Nicolaou & Bhattacharya, 2006) q
performance effects of ERP systems usage: The impact of post-

implementation changes"
91 ¤" /¤A ¤ A . " ' 2 / 83&
/¤A 8¤02 " %$1 %

91 . ' 2 83& !
Q
¤ 8¤5
8 " / #@ #5 #77 !/A
46
PC¤ ¤ " / :& 77 5 ./A /A
" / 8$ ./A A / .B 8

8
A
3 /@ 8F 2 PC 8 !
3 / (247) 8 /
¤$ " .Q

; ,5 %
3 *
3 /A
8¤A
¤ *¤7 *, 2 PC ./A A
c¤ 2 !#3 8" 9 /"3 " &. /A /A /&?
.&F / '&1 5

3 /A
"Exploring the effects of ERP systems on 5 (Velcu, 2007 )
organizational performance: Evidence from Finnish companies"
¤3
Q 91 " /A A . ' 2 / 83&
:& " %1 8" " /"0 8F . 2 /3,( !/; 8
¤$ / ¤ /¤3 8

3 /" (14) %@ / 8$ ./A1
9 " &.? /A1 :& 7 >5 '# /A /A
./A
¤ /A + 7; /; /5@ " ? 2 / 80"

8A * + :& /$ /5 7" ' /A
/A A , *, " / 8 !/A A
./A A ;

8A 7 +3
3 &.? *7 '#
47
"Post-Implementation Evaluation 5 (Madapusi, 2008 )
of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems"

7 " % !/A /A ' 2 / 83&
. ' " 8 !/A A ; /;" 8 /$ 91
/¤ 8¤ f ./A A /" " /1 $ %
./# /0
/ (900) /
/¤A ¤ ¤ A x 8& j 2 / PC 8 5
f2
3
" /A A /&
3 91
3 8F" /;" >
2 / /;" /1 $ % 8& 2 PC 8 .8F
/3,2 .8 D $ " .Q

" /A A
¤; /¤" %@¤ $ % #

8 2 / 80" 3 c 2
$ % " 7

8 / 9 7 /A
./A A # %@
"The Impact of ERP Investments on 5 (Eetzady, 2008 )
Organizational Performance"
91 ¤" /¤A /A /"3 . ' 2 / 83&
/ 8 "

91 " /A /A . >5 %@
Q
j¤ " / / (158) 8 / " / 8$ 2 .8 + *3 %@
/¤$ !$ 2 / :&

3 !* 1
3

¤ ¤ /A 8

j 8 / (79) '? 1
48
¤
j 8 / (79) /. /$ 8
3 !/A
./A /A E
¤
¤ 91
¤3 /¤ 8 3 $ 2 / PC 8 5
8#¤ .#

8 /A /A1 / 8
¤ ¤ /¤A? / 85 , 8"

3 /
./A /A 9 /" 9. /A
"Impact Of ERP Systems On Small (Ashim Raj, 2008) q
And Mid Sized Public Sector Enterprises"

%¤ /Q A /$ C; : + f ;
¤$ '¤" s¤; !/¤$( %. /" .i 2 #;0 8Q
%. /" l .i ./A

3 / *2 9 ' s; /
./ !/ !'" s; !% 89$2
¤ / /$ / 9 "? 7 /A1 :&

2 f %0
.+5 7$ /5 !/A1 :# l
"A Case Study Exploring The q 5 (Alexander, 2009) q
Effectiveness of ERP Integration Towards Managerial Performance"

¤5 ¤ .1 /A /A /3 2 / 83&
:¤& /¤& ' " 83& ./0 8C

3 ( 91 " D" "0
(40 ) ¤2 (20) ¤ 8 / " / 8$ .%1 / " /A1
¤5 ¤ (3) !
0¤ %$ / / 8;? !-3 -
./# (5) !*$ (3) !8 (4) !/

49
¤. f¤
3 8"$ 5 8" /A
3 8F 2 / 80"
" *5 " A /"3 * 8# /C "
#3 = +3 2 / 80" .'A , + ## 9
: DC 'A 9 " &. /A1 A /"; #2
.,
"Measuring the Impact of Enterprise 5 (Morris, 2009 )
Resource Planning (ERP) Systems Through the Prism of Accounting

Theory"
¤A %@¤ ¤ /A A /"3 . >5 2 / 83&
V¤ ¤" /¤A A . ' 2 /3,( !/ /A
/ " / 8$ ./ 8" " /" , !/& /5 !/(
/A A ; " % /0 (33) %. / (147) 8
.(2003 q1994)
V " .? c" /A A 2 / 80"
8" /0 /" , " $2 . c"

3 /& /5 /(
8" /A? /"0 8 8 f

3 # PC :& ? 2 ./
¤ ¤ A ; 'A /&1 c2 7 !/
.8Q :& 9 /"3 " &. #Q

3 /A
"Interdependence and qqq 5 (Dickover, 2009 ) qqq
Differentiation: Evaluating a Structured Equation Model For

Enterprise Resource Planning System Business Impact Using a Public
Sector Environment"
50
%¤ $ " /A A /"3 . 2 / 83&
'¤" /"# / x 77 2 / 8 . j /C
3
A
/ :& 83# 2 ./A A ; /$ 7
¤ +¤7 2 !* 1
3 C A
3 /A
./ / " '1 V
% . 8 / 8 /5@ $ 2 / 80" 5
83@ / 8

3 !/A ; /$ /$(
g,¤ /& .1 % / 2 / PC 8 ./" % .¦
./A ; % 3 $

3 /& %
"Evaluating User Participation And 5 (Gibbs, 2010 )
User Influence in An Enterprise System"

¤. !¤ / % /" /5@ ' 2 / 83&
./¤A ¤ ¤ A

3 / 8 + 8" , !
./ j, /"0 8 8 c

"" P# / 8
./A / 'A (20) 8 / " / 8$ 5
¤ A * /A /A 2 / 80" 5
!8 /3 9

3 * / / D3 " !
" =7F
¤$ 2 / PC 8 5 . #

8 #
F
¤2 /$ c& 2 !8"

, *7 /5@
./A /A j

/$ / , 7@ #$ %
51
"Critical Success Factors in 5 (Yousef, 2010 )
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems Implementation"

8¤A
¤3 /A A /&?
77 2 / 83&
:¤&
¤3 /¤A A ; /" D$
80 !/1
A % 3 $ 2 Q

% ' 2 /3,( !8A
./¤A ¤ /A ; " % :& . %" !/A
A ; " % 3 8 f@. / 8 3 / sl1
.1
3 /A
!8" $ " /A A ; /"3 2 / 80" 5
+¤$ /¤
3 " 8 /A1 :& 8" $ 8 2
/ % !/7 8" * # A

3 / 8"
D¤$
8 2 PC 8 .A &
8" % /5
./ % ; / / /;"

3 /". /A A ;
"The Impact of ERP Systems on q 5 (Galani et al., 2010 ) q
"Accounting Processes
.2 / 8" " /A A . ' 2 / 83&
" &. / %1 /C 8" $
3 /"0 8F
8 ¤ / (30) 8 / " / :& 87 2 ./A
3 8"
/ 8 V 2 * !/A A

/
./. / 8 " &; . A :& 7 !A :#
52
3¤ ¤
¤3 #¤ /A A ; 2 / 80"
8$ /" 85 %" 2 /3,( ! + " !/;" s; !8"
% " 8 /A A 3 2 PC 8 .c"#
8¤ " ,; .? c" # 2 !8" 2 %0
3 / !8"
./. /
"Impact of Enterprise Resource q

q 5 (Garg, 2010 ) q
q
on Organizational Productivity in an Information Planning

."Technology Organization
/ $ 8 " ' D /" / :& 8"
¤ ¤
¤ /1 % f 5 *9; /$( c /A1
%¤# !*( ¤ :%¤. /A A /
3 &3
, j 2 !89$( !/A /3. !8" c !/A"
A
.C7 ;A
5 /A /A1 g0 ; / :&

3 PC 8#A
7¤ ¤ D¤ .A :& %.

3 8.
8A /$2 85 87
¤ #h3 / :& " /

3 * % – f & §
/¤$2 77

91 V C7 ;A /A" /$2 *7
.% 8$ /" 51 %@ #" 8A
"A Study of the Impact of Business q 5 (Tsai et al., 2010) q
."Process on the ERP System Effectiveness

53
9 % 89$2 /& *2 /5@ .1 %

3 f 2 / 83&
¤
¤1 /& /Q % (ERP ) 8Q /A
. /A A ; $

3 89$( /& *2 D"
%¤ %¤ 89$( % 3 " D /Q A
?
8¤" j¤ 2 !/¤$( /3 *7 /Q V2 2 /3,( /A
¤ ¤ A C3 -, ./ /$ " # *7 !C7
+¤ !8" 3 *9; !8" 9$( 7@ 85 %" & /A
+¤ ¤2 Q 8" +$

3 -, ./ 8""
. /"

¤.
¤3 #" 8
/A /A /3 > /
. 9, !8" !A *$ :

B 0
"The Impact of ERP Implementation 5 (Huang, 2011 )
on Organizational Capabilities and Firm Performance"

/$ " /A /A ; . ' 2 / 83&
./A"
Q 91 & 77
/A 8 " /A
3 %1
; /5@ " /A 8 %1 /$ . 2 /
8 / " / 8$ 2 .

Q 91 /A /A
.# /. 8 +$ / (400)
$2 . c" /A /A ; 2 / 80"
3 /$ :& ; 2 !/; % /$ 'A " % /A
" = / " g /A 8 " /A *5 77
54
, " 3 % /A /A 2 PC 8 .

91
*9; + * *$ 8$ 9 " % !P 0 , 2 /;"
.%01 " C 77 /7@ /;
) & 3A2
A >

/. " 8 / :& t
1
3 / 8Q t
=t \ /
3 ERP /A
A ; j j & Eo .+$ / 8 5

8Q &;

+ ,1 = /
3 ERP
= /
3 %1 8 5 +$ j & ) l 2 1
3 /
8 :& 97$ " A 8);

=1 8Q + c '@ "
:& 85 c 2 /3,2 ! 7" 8 + j 5 / j 5 %.
j@ %@ ERPqA & /"3 5 %

1 g, 2 /
! j, &
3 8 t 8 f / 8 /3 0
3 f
! 8" *$ ) ERP% /A /"; ? 1 :& % " 8$

. ( , ! A *$
8 +$ / / + %; / :# 87 ? /.
i
3 # %
3 *$ % % 8
8
=1 %1 8 5

3 /A /A % 3 8 f
. /A " &. = /

3 /A1 :& %F ? V
55
K 01#
3C
1A3
;A /3 9i #" %0 8" / / 5@

3 / *C
3 /A ORACLE ERP suite A
(2) 5 " g, & 'A 100 & ¥ 7 j3 = /
;0 P# /. 8 !# /$( / /

/"C1 %@ !
#"" 8 +$ '# !/ / c !

""
P# & 2 !+5

3 $ *&A +5 / !8,;
85@ ' *&A %" 2 2 *&A '0 8" +$ '
.: +5

3 # 8$ 2 %0 &; %$ /;" &
c / P# !/ /" &$ *2 > " / 0 *3 c
.? @ *; /5 %" / !; &A !#,3 #$
- 5 !- -5; / 8 PC D2 8& . !/ 8F
.-,3
-" 8,; x6 /@ # V$ 03 &
.- #,2
: C N3 2A3
& ¥ >C 7/= /1 / *C / +$
;A 8 3 / / ! (2) 5 " g, & -;A (250)
56
! /A Financial Oracle EqBusiness suite A
j; & > j3 > " D / +$
#
* *C
& / *C /A oracle A j
F >5 + c " \9 h3

! D"F #3 oracle% A
"; >

/ (100) +7 =$ 2 ! /5 # /5@
(96) # %

C0 %"" /0 /$ 8 ¥" !A"
. /
>$ f / / 31 /3F 8F g, (1q3) 5 %$
Oracle ERP % A + % 8 ! % / !

" =
/ / /3F C0 (1q3) %$
% :# >
63.5 61 ,
36.5 35 2 P 3
100 96 83
56.3 54 35A26
30.2 29 45 A36
5
13.5 13 ]
46
100 96 83
29.2 28 '
64.6 62 5 3
5
6.3 6 )
100 96 83
3.1 3 # N*

96.9 93 $ &
57
100 96 83
3.1 3 1 0*
92.7 89 ) 3A1 N 05 )
2.1 2 ) 5A4 Oracle '
2.1 2 ) 5 ERP
100 96 83
: ) 5 2 01& 1 ) 3A3
:/B 81 ! / 0 ; 8" 8 " %0 sF
!/$ %C !8 !8 A V$ /" 8" .1
V
./ j, /00 / /$1 /"
8 f PC " \9 #0

3 /2 >5 *
& !/ .2
ª/"
V$ % /7@ /1 8 " %0" j, %$
3
*$ ! A *$ ) /A A /"3 8F " f 3
(Cedric,A.L. ,(2009) ; ;Garg,M.A.(2010); %«5 /( , ! 8"
Armstrong,B.R.(2005); Longinidis,P.A., Gotzamani,K.A.(2009); Rosemann, M.I and
%«5 /
Q 91 7 F 2 /3,( Wiese, J.E(1999))
/C 97$ /.@.

3 / 0 5 .( (2007, /) (Ababneh,R.A(2008);
:
"
! 83 (5) %@ /3F C0 " 8F %1 % ( )
+ % 8 !

;A +5 !
" = ! ! >$) /,
. ( Oracle ERP % A

58
*$) /, /A /A /"; " 8F

. % (-.)
. ( , ! A *$ ! 8"
8" *9; ) /,

Q 91 7 " 8F f. % (-..)
. (
Q " ! /"
> . o D c

3 V !
likert 8 >
/, / 3 2 !D$ 7 D#3 /# 9B > -
5 ! :$ > #

8 * % " #3 = "
:
" 8$ 8$t
* 3 3 3 * 3
8$ (1) 8$ (2) 8$ (3) 8$ (4) 8$ (5)
: : 1&/ 7 4A3
/C0( V1 /. 85 #,3 / /"C /$
:
" '?
/
. > 8. /$ ?" Cronbagh Alpha 8. % .1
/3 ( /C V ! 8! / 1)

;0 90( V .2
.F % =
. ( ( ! ) /"" V1 .3
-, / " c / 8F /5@ /$ j > % .4
& /5 ,(V) % F + F /5@ *5 "
$
#3 -;0 % /5 8 h3 (1q ,1+) %
(1+) % /5 8 2

Q 91 7 V /5@
59
>; + F 7 (V) % F 7 2 $

" $
3 (1q) % /5 8 2 /
F s; 2 Q ' (V) % F 7 2 ,F
. g0 > +
. one sample T- test. .5

: C ( 61 5A3
( "- 61
" / s /. 85 / *

3 &A 0 >5 sF
$ %$
3 > /C& 9, 0 /$
8 /" /&; /F" 8A@ /$ 2 !(1") 8"
.
( )
#@0 ?" / 1 (Cornobach Alpha) % V
( Alpha ≥ 0.60 ) ; / f >"
(2q3) %$ ! /( /( " /" 8

3 / /
:/ 1 ; 5
5 # )R 5 '* (2A3) 03
# 0 5 )# 5
0.74 3 8" *$

0.81 5 A *$
0.78 2 ,
0.85 15
Q 91 7
0.79 25 % *1
60
(%70) / 8; ; % 5 (2q3) %$ f
. (%79) ¥" f.
61
N 01#
) ;# : 1&4 0& %*
: 1A4
#2 %0

C0( %" PC s 2
C % %0; & '#
. (SPSS) /$ "" /C0( 7 P %@
O: < 2A4
: # 5 O: <
%1 >C / %Q
*$) f = /

3 /A /"3 .? =
m
Q 91 7 " ( , !A *$ !8"
.) 5 (3 5 6

) 2 65 A
= *; /& / 83 / 8 % /. 8
.(1q4) %$ g,

&
C0( %" 8" *$ o 8;
*$ 8; = /&1 / 83 / 8 (1q4)%$
/ *C
3 oracle ERP A
8$( -3 8"
(1A4)03
) 5 (3 .1
$& 4 -
t 5 ) 5 0
' " 5 & ( 5
C 01& ) 5
N# 121.680 0.32 4.021 1 1
C# ERP0 '
ERP 0 ' )/5
N# 87.431 0.45 4.00 3 2
&
ERP0 ' ) 5 >
N# 106.265 0.37 4.01 2 3
05
# ) ;
62
4.01 ' 5 &
A
8$2 V 8" *$ 83 %" 2 (1q4)%$
+ / (4.021q4.0) # / 8 8 f / *C
) 5 " )

* 89$ 2 (4.01) ¥ #

'h (4.02)

1 /&1 (C# ERP0 ' C 01&
)/5 * 8"

3 .(4.01)
+ / (0.32)
' (4.00)

* /&1 \ & ERP 0 '
% 8" *$ (4.01)

+ / (0.45)
.-; 8; +$ / 8 " = h3
.' (3 5 6

) 2 65 A7
=¤ *; /& / 83 / 8 % /. 8
.(2q4) %$ g,

&
C0( %" A *$ o 8;
*$ 8; = /&1 / 83 / 8 (2q4)%$
/ *C
3 oracle ERP A
8$( -3 A
(2A4)03
' (3 .2
$& 4 -
t 5 ) 5 0
' " 5 & ( 5
68.041 0.55951 3.8854 *; ERP% A 8"
N# 4 1
/;" 8
71.656 0.53270 3.8958 /3 / ERP% A 7
N# 3 /" 8F + V$ 2
%1 / , V
N# 62.978 0.59152 3.8021 5 " D ERP% A 7 3

63
/;" " 8$ /"
65.785 0.58180 3.9063 8" ERP% A 3

N# 2 4
? V 85
90.456 0.44117 4.0729 /# ERP% A 7
N# 1 5
(
3.9125 ' 5 &
*C A
8$2 V A *$ 83 %" 2 (2q4)%$
+ / (4.0729q3.8021) # / 8 8 2 /
ERP% A 7 ) * 89$ 2 (3.9125) ¥ #

'h (4.0729)

1 /&1 ( ( /#
7) * 8"

3 .(3.9125)
+ / (0.441170)
*1 /&1 \ ( /;" " 8$ /" " D ERP% A
+ / (0.591520) ' (3.8021)

+$ / 8 " = h3 % A *$ (3.9125)
.-; 8;
. ; 5 6

) 2 65 A=
= *; /& / 83 / 8 % /. 8
.(3q4) %$ g,

&
C0( %" , o 8;
64
, 8; = /&1 / 83 / 8 (3q4)%$
/ *C
3 oracle ERP A
8$( -3
(3A4)03
; .3
$& 4 -
t 5 ) 5 0
' " 5 & ( 5
8" $ *
/ %" 3 /
N# 40.100 0.85 3.46 2 1
D$ 5
% "
ERP % A
8
/,( s
N# 52.303 0.76 4.1 1

3 8# # 2
ERP% A
3.76
' 5 &
A
8$2 V , 83 %" 2 (3q4)%$
+ / (4.1q3.46) # / 8 8 2 / *C
/,( s) * 89$ 2 (3.76) ¥ #

1 /&1 (ERP% A

3 8# # 8
8"
3 .(3.76)
+ / (0.76) 'h (4.1)
D$ 5
% " / %" 3 /1 8" $ * ) *
(0.85) ' (3.46)

* /&1 \ (ERP % A
= h3 % , (3.76)

+ /
.-; 8; +$ / 8 "

65
) ;
3A4
%@ !/ 8,3 " V$ &
3 /. 8"
¤" 8")¤t
!/ 8F /" 8F .1 $(
:
" c ! #? / /" >
: [;#
\) 5 (3) 5t

# : 1&! / , 3 /
u 6&

53 (' ; \' (3
.(0 .05 ≥ α ) /
1 % .1 " %" /,; :&
( , !A *$ !8" *$) &? /A /A /"3
PC (4q4)%$ = / =

Q 91 7
3 /$
.%"
/A /"3 .1 %" PC (4q4)%$

Q 91 7 " /$ /A

5
' ; ' (3 ) 5 (3

0.28 0.53 0.1 (BETA)*
.( .05 ≥ α ) = /C02 / .?
38.24 = / F 0.75 = (R) %

66
0.000 = / = Sig. 0.60 = (R2) %
& (/$) /A /A /"3 . (4q4)%$ A@
8#A 2 = E / =

Q 91 7
3 (4q4) %$ /,
/A /"3 1 /C02 / . $

C0( %" PC
6 % ¥" 2 = / =

Q 91 7
3 /A
-/$ 1 :# -. c& ? 8. & !( .05 ≥ α ) = (0.75)R /$
,-, (0.60) ¥" 3 (R2) % .= /1

Q 91
3
3 F P
Q 91
3 7
3 8F (0.60) D5
β . 8$ 8F" ! = /

3 /A /A /"3
3 * /$ & *7

& ! (4q4)%$
3 /,
& 6
Q 91 7

3 *7 Q /A /"3
/5 .1 & / Q %$ >; *$ β / = E / =
.(38.24) 8F"
/ F
Q
/" % 1 /C /,; s3 Q &
(3) 5t
# : 1&! / ", 3
6&

53 (' ; \' (3 \) 5
.( .05 ≥ α ) /
: 2 # ;#
[/ 6&

' (3 : 1&! / , 3 / H02
.( .05 ≥ α )
67
*$ . 2 ' %$ %" 2 /,; :&
" x *5 2 '" ( R2) 5

Q 91 7
3 8"
PC (5q4) %$ ! # -3 + F % F .1 ;
.%"
91 7
3 8" *$ . /3 %" PC (5q4)%$

Q
Sig (DF) (β) (R2) (R)
(F)
) 3 0 5 0 5 0 5
&
/ & & 4 & 4
1
) 5 (3
.000 90 0.57 44.1 0.33 0.57
6&
91
.( .05 ≥ α ) = /C02 / .?
8#A 2
Q 91
3 7
3 8" *$ . (5q4)%$ A@
3 7
3 8" *$ /C02 / . $
C0( %" PC
% . ( .05 ≥ α ) = (0.57)R % ¥" 2

Q 91
Q 91 7
3 8F (0.33) D5 ,(0.33) | 3 (R2)
8F" ! = /

3 A 8" *$
3 F P
8" *$
3 * /$ & *7
& (0.57) β .? /$
/5 .1 & / Q (0.57) /

Q 91
3 7
3 *7 2 Q
. (44.1) 8F"
/ F
: "
/" /,; %5 1 /; /,; %5 /0 Q &
68

6&
) 5 (3 : 1& / ", 3
.( .05 ≥ α ) /
: # ;#

6&
' (3 : 1& / , 3 / H03
.( .05 ≥ α ) /
A *$ . 2 ' %$ %" /,; :&
#3
Q 91
3 7 = E /
3 /A A
.%" PC g, (6q4)%$

Q 91 7
3 A *$ . PC (6q4)%$
Sig (DF) (β) (R2) (R)

‫ى‬#$@8 ‫
ت‬:‫در‬ 8
<8 (F) 8
<8 8
<8 ‫
ن‬.‫ا‬
Q‫ا‬ PH%‫ا‬ ‫ار‬%3I‫ا‬ P%$‫ا‬ ‫
ط‬1‫ر‬I‫ا‬
1
6&
' (3
.000 90 0.7 86.1 0.50 0.70

91
.( .05 ≥ α ) = /C0 / .?
PC 8#A 2 !
Q 91 7
3 A *$ . (6q4) %$ g,
!
Q 91 7
3 A *$ /C02 / . $
C0( %"
(R2) % .( .05 ≥ α ) / = (0.70) R % ¥" 2
*$ P
Q 91 7
3 8F (0.50)D5 ,(0.50) ¥" 3

& . (0.70) β .? /$ /5 8F" !/A A A
91
3 7
3 *7 2 Q * /$ A *$
3 & *7
69
& . (86.1) 8F"

/ F /5 .1 & / Q . (0.70)/
Q
:"
/" /,; %5 ! /. /; /,; %5 /0 Q
6&

' (3 : 1& / ", 3
. ( .05 ≥ α ) /
: # ;#

6&
' ; : 1&! / , 3 / H04
.( .05 ≥ α ) /
. /5@ 2 ' %$ %" /,; :&

3 7 = /
3 (ERP) /A A ,
.%" PC g, (7q4) %$

Q 91
91
3 7
3 , . /3 (7q4)%$

Q
Sig (DF) (R2) (R)
8
<8 (β)
‫ى‬#$@8 ‫
ت‬:‫در‬ (F) 8
<8 8
<8 ‫
ن‬.‫ا‬
‫ار‬%3I‫ا‬
Q‫ا‬ PH%‫ا‬ P%$‫ا‬ ‫
ط‬1‫ر‬I‫ا‬
1
6&
' ;
.000 90 0.51 31.25 0.26 0.51

91
. ( .05 ≥ α ) = /C0 / .?
, /C02 / . $ (7q4)%$

3 /
C0( %" PC 8#A
(0.51) R % ¥" 2, !

Q 91
3 7
3
(0.26) D5 ,(0.26) ¥" 3 (R2) % ,.( .05 ≥ α )/ =
/
3 (ERP)% A , P
Q 91 7
3 8F
70
,
3 * /$ *7
&,(0.51) β.? /$ /5 8F" ! =
.1 & / Q ,(0.51) /

Q 91 7
3 *7 2 Q
.(31.25) 8F"
/ F /5
D "

/" /,; %5 , /.. /; /,; s3 Q &
/

6&
' ; : 1&! / , 3
.( .05 ≥ α )
71
P 01#
) 1 O: %*
) 3 / 1A5
¤ .?¤ /¤ 8¤" 8,3 -, 85 8 Q * 2 / 83&
¤ /¤$( /¤ /" %

3 8# PC * 2 8"0 !/ 8F
PC 8 f 8$ :& 7 2 * ( & /. % . #,3 # Q
%¤5 ¤ (ERP ) /¤A A 8" *$ .? = %"
1 V 1 / (4.01) ¥"

¢% .? D A

% A

3 A / 8" *$ /& " % & /
%¤5 A *$ .? = %" PC 8#A D
3 A

¤1 V¤ /¤. / (3.91) ¥"

.? D A

(ERP) A , .? %" PC 8 /
1 V /.. / (4.02) ¥"

Q 91 7 " .? D
./& D /& 1 %5 & /
A /"; /C02 / -. c& 8#A / h3 /$

3 /$ ( , ! A *$ ! 8" *$) 6 3 /A
/"; /C02 / . $ ( .05 ≥ α ) D =

Q 91 7
( , ! A *$ ! 8" *$) 6 3 /A A
. ( .05 ≥ α ) D =

Q 91
3 7
3 : %
72
) 1:(2A5)
/" A ( # %0

,/ :& /0" PC %@
¤ %¤0 ¤ 8"

C0( %" +5 #" %0
PC c
:/ 80
:&
3 #
/A /"3 1 *, .1
. A & =0 *C; # /
Oracle % A = E /1 /, +$ % *, .2
%¤.1 %@F¤ ¤& #& A & *$ '&1 c ERP
./Q
/¤ 8 ¤ ERP% A 85 *, .3
% ¤ D
A C; #3 ! % /00
. / %#
%@¤ ¤ 8 /0

3 " / /"3 *7 *, .4
.Oracle ERP % A #
. " 8 = /$ + " A * %; *, .5
%¤" 3¤ =¤ E /

3 8" $ * 7 *, .6
. Oracle ERP% A

D$ 5
% " /
¤ /A /"; " 3 8 7 % /.

0 .7
. :; $ / /7 /1 ')" 5 A & /A
/¤A /"; *$ ? -, *$ 8 % /.
0 .8
. q = E / – /A 9 " &. /

73
1 : *
5 N3
¤" ¤C ¤" *? ¤ . >5 .(2011) !8 .1
/0¤ 8 ¤ ¤" / / q/ /0 8

3 .
8¤A
¤3 ¤; %¤ > %
" !q/ /0
3 /$
./. 805
3 / %1
!
Q 91
3 &. /( 85@1 .(2010 ) !0 83 !$ .2
.>" !/ $ /$ !/. /5
!/¤Q A $

3 /$ % .(2010) = ! .3
." 8" 1 /$ !* l $ /
/ *2 /$ /"3 *9; >5 .( 2006 ) !80 .4
/"$ ! A /#$ /1 /;0 8Q

3
Q 91 #5@
.(2) ! (34) "$ !/1 /$ \8
/¤"
3 " / 82 9 0 9 .(2008) ! .5
./@( ( /$ !* l : / !/ /
7 " &. #" /3 *2 8" /5@. (2008) 7 !*7 .6
. 1 /$ !* l $ / !

Q 91
¤"52
¤3 * = 7
Q 91 #; .(2007 ) % !* .7
./1 /$ !* l : / ! x 9 V$
;¤ / ¤ /5@ 3 /( 8" A /"3 .(2005) >3 !
" .8
.%0 /$ !* l : / ! A 0 *$

74
V x #; :

Q 91 .(2000) !/ .9
.* l /5 !1 ! !/ *( # !91
=¤ ¤#5@ /( 8" /A *9; = .(2005 )

" !
.10
8¤$
¤3 /¤( 8 5 9Q A /#$ ( 91
." 8" / /$ !* l : / !/ /1
!
Q 91 /"3
3 8" $ (2007)
;0 !/ .11
." 8" / /$ !* l : / !
/A $ " *.Q %"

$ . (2008) > !7" .12
./1 /$ !* l $ / !1

3 /A
8Q
3 8
3 8" A .(2009 ) !/7# .13
"" /$ /"$!( /A3 / 8Q

3 / /) /
.%1 !25 "$ !/ /05
:7
1 ! %1 8A
3 7 *$ .(2009) i ! ' !*3 .14
.+7 "
+$ / . E.
.(2009) %$ Vl !0 ª%$ V !0 ª% !

.15
.8 8" x /" *$ *2

3 / .*0 *$ *2
.+7 " /"7 .E

75
: 3 N3
1. Tsai, W., Chen, S., Hwang, E., & Hsu, J.. (2010). A Study of the
Impact of Business Process on the ERP System
Effectiveness. International Journal of Business and
Management, 5(9), 26-37.
2. M. Lynne Markus, Sheryl Axline, David Petrie, & Sheryl Cornelis
Tanis. (2000). Learning from adopters' experiences with ERP: problems
encountered and success achieved. Journal of Information
Technology, 15(4), 245-265.
3. Alexander Cedric (2009). Case Study: Exploring the effectiveness
of ERP Integration towards managerial performance.(Doctoral
dissertation), Capella university. Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
4. DELONE,H and MCLEAN,R(2003). The DeLone and McLean Model
of Information systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of
Management Information Systems, vol.19 , No.4 ,p 9-30 .
5. Delone, W.H, & Mclean, E.(1992).Information system success: The
Quest for the defendant variable. Information system
research,V.3,N.1, P 60-95 .
6. Garg, M.A.(2010). Impact of Enterprise Resource Planning on
Organizational Productivity in an Information Technology
Organization,(Unpublished Doctoral dissertation), Walden
University.USA.
7. Kennerely, M.I. & Neely, A.N (2001). Enterprise Resource Planning:
analyzing the Impact of Integrated Manufacturing Systems,12(2).
8. Alexander Cedric (2009). Case Study: Exploring the effectiveness of
ERP Integration towards managerial performance.(Doctoral
dissertation), Capella university. Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
76
9. Atiyyah,Hamid S.(1989).Determinants of computer system

effectiveness in Saudi Arabian public organization, Int. Studies of Mgt.
& Org., Vol.19 , N.2, PP 85-103.
10.Klenke, Karin,(1992).Construct measurement in management
information systems: A review and critique of user satisfaction and user
involvement instruments”. Information system. Vol.30 ,N.4 ,PP.325-
348.
11.Palanisamy, Ramaraj., &Sushil.(2001).Empirically testing the
relationship between user involvement , information waste, and MiS
Success. Journal of services Research. V.1, N,1 , April-September, PP
70-103.
12.Raymond, Louis.(1985).Organizational characteristics and MIS success
in the context of small business. MIS quarterly/March, PP37-52.
13.Tsai, W., Chen, S., Hwang, E., & Hsu, J.. (2010). A Study of the Impact
of Business Process on the ERP System Effectiveness. International
Journal of Business and Management.5(9), 26-37.
14.Single, A.S.(2008).Impact Of ERP systems on small and MID sized

public sector Enterprises.journal of theoretical and Applied
Information Technology.
15.Ayyagari, R.A.(2010). Hands-on ERP Learning: Using OpenERP®, an

Alternative to SAP. Journal of Information Systems Education, Vol.
22(2) .
16.Ababneh,R.A(2008). A Comprehensive Performance Evaluation of the

Jordanian Customs Department Using the Balanced Scorecard. Jordan
Journal of Business Administration, Volume 4, No. 4 .
17.Norreklit, H. (2000) The balance on the balanced scorecard- a critical

analysis of some of its assumptions, Management Accounting
Research.
18.Peterson, W. and Gijsbers, G. and Wilks, M.,(2003). An Organizational

Performance for Agricultural Research Organizations, ISNAR
77
19.Rosemann, M.I and Wiese, J.E(1999). Measuring the Performance of

ERP Software– a Balanced Scorecard Approach. Australasian
Conference on Information Systems
20.Eldon,L.I(1997). Perceived Importance of Information System Success

Factors: A Meta Analysis of Group Differences. Information &
Management, 32(1).
21.Kaplan, R. and D. Norton (2001), Transforming the Balanced Scorecard

From Performance Measurement to Strategic Management: Part I,
Accounting Horizons.
22.Kaplan, R. and D. Norton (1996a). Linking the Balanced Scorecard to

Strategy, California Management Review.
23.Kaplan, R. and D. Norton (1996b). Translating Strategy into Action:

the Balanced Scorecard to, Harvard Business School Press, Boston,
Mass, Fall.
24.Kaplan, R.S., and David, P.Norton, (1993). Putting The Balanced
Scorecard to work, Harvard Business Review.
25.Horngren C., Foster G., Datar S.(2000)- Cost Accounting .prentice Hall
International , INC.
26.Kaplan R. S. , Norton D. P. (1996) Balanced Scorecard , by the

president and Fellows of Harvard college, United States of America .
BOOKS
27.Goyal, D.P.(1998). Management information systems: Coceptand

application , Deep& Deep publications. New Delhi.
28.Elliott, Geoffrey., & Starking, Susan.(1998). Business information

technology: Systems, theory and prectice”, 1st. ed, longman.
29.O’brien, James.(2004).Management information systems: managing

information technology in the business enterprise, 6th.Ed.MCGraw-
Hill.
78
30.OZ. Effy.(2000).Management information systems, 2nd.Ed, Course

Technology A division of thomason learning.
31.Robbins, S.P.(1990).Organization Theory: structure design and

applications, 3rd.Ed, prentice-Hall international Inc.
32.Senn, Jame A.(1998). Information technology in business Principles,

Practices, and opportunities, 2nd.Ed, prentice Hall, New Jersey.
33.Thierauf, Robert J.(1984).Effectiveness management information
systems, Bell&Howell Company, Columbus. Ohio.
79
(1) 6&
' & 3
0//$ )o
V /&//"&1 \ /$ * g0.
V "// 9" /$ / $ .
V /&// 9" /$ + .
/ E /$ // 8" A )o g0 .

80
81
82
83
84

أثر فاعلية أنظمة تخطيط موارد المنظمة على تميز الأداء المؤسسي - أسماء مروان الفاعوري

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

أثر فاعلية أنظمة تخطيط موارد المنظمة على تميز الأداء المؤسسي - أسماء مروان الفاعوري

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats



  :     

The Impact of (ERP) Enterprise Resources Planning

  !

  4 0  '*

0  (! 

‫     

‫ ‪\ % 1 *2 /"

‫" ;‪./ :& / 5 % #",‬‬

‫  " @

‫‪/3 /B ! 8 + $ /"  9. 8@#  *  : 5   /  *C‬‬

‫وا و  ا  ‪ ،‬وه ا   و ا ‪.‬‬

‫!‪7 0 5 (    ",  2‬‬

‫!‪ 3  &    :  2‬‬

3 C:   % 2A1

4  $- 3A1

6  & 6A1

7  )& 7A1

8 :34 ) &1  9A1

  )  "  4:  01#

39   )  2A2

39 5 )  1A2A2

45  3/ )  2A2A2

54   )    &    3A2

( )34 )  3C :K  01#

55 C   N 3 2A3

57 ) 5  2 01&  1   ) 3A3

58    : 1&4 7  4A3

59 C   ( 61 5A3

() ;#  : 1&4 0& %* )  O:  : N 01#

) 1 O:   %* : P  01#

75  3 N3  .2

80 (: #    ",      7  (2) '* 6&

. ERP    '         

56 / / /3F  C0 1- 3

59   5 # )R 5 '* 2- 3

/ &1 /  83   /  8  

61 8$( -3 8 "  *$ 8;  =  1- 4

/ &1 /  83   /  8  

/ &1 /  83   /  8  

64 8$( -3    , 8;  =  3- 4

/ A /"3  .1      %"   PC

‫      ‪ 

‫ا ‪%‬‬ ‫ا ‪#$%‬ى‬ ‫ر ا ‪-‬ر ا !‬

‫‪7‬‬ ‫أ ذج ا ‪-‬را‪$‬‬ ‫‪8-1‬‬

‫‪37‬‬ ‫ ‪2‬م ‪7 789‬س ا‪5‬داء ا از  ‪;< 34‬ل‬

‫‪/ ;0‬‬ ‫ =‬ ‫‪5‬‬

‫‪79‬‬ ‫ ‪  /$ 9‬‬ ‫‪1‬‬

‫‪80‬‬ ‫‪=   /  V‬‬ ‫‪2‬‬

‫‪81‬‬ ‫(‪/‬‬ ‫‪3‬‬

5 >  ? 

:& /"3  / %@  != E  / 

+ $ =$ c 9,

2 / 8"0 / 8,;   %    %"  /"

: # & PC  

+ $ % *, %. / c" 8$  *;  2 '#

Oracle ERP % A   = E  / 1 /,   

85   *, ! / 1   %. 1 %@F    

/ 8    Oracle ERP% A   

"  / /"3 *7    *, !  %  /00

   !Oracle ERP% A #  %@  8 /0

8   = /$ + " A * %; *, 

The Impact of (ERP) Enterprise Resources Planning effectiveness

8 / 8 A  :&   $  !/  /3 

:

!

4 0 '*

0 (!

‫

‫ ‪\ %1 *2 /"

‫" ;‪./ :& / 5 % #",‬‬

‫ " @

‫‪/3 /B ! 8 +$ /" 9. 8@# :5 / C‬‬

‫وا و ا ‪ ،‬وه ا و ا ‪.‬‬

‫!‪7 05 ( ", 2‬‬

‫!‪ 3 & : 2‬‬

3 C: % 2A1

4 $- 3A1

6 & 6A1

7 )& 7A1

8 :34 ) &1 9A1

) " 4: 01#

39 ) 2A2

39 5 ) 1A2A2

45 3/ ) 2A2A2

54 ) & 3A2

( )34 ) 3C :K 01#

55 C N3 2A3

57 ) 5 2 01& 1 ) 3A3

58 : 1&4 7 4A3

59 C ( 61 5A3

() ;# : 1&4 0& %* ) O: : N 01#

) 1 O: %* : P 01#

75 3 N3 .2

80 (: # ", 7 (2) '* 6&

. ERP '

56 / / /3F C0 1- 3

59 5 # )R 5 '* 2- 3

/&1 / 83 / 8

61 8$( -3 8" *$ 8; = 1- 4

/&1 / 83 / 8

/&1 / 83 / 8

64 8$( -3 , 8; = 3- 4

/A /"3 .1 %" PC

‫ ‪

‫ا‪%‬‬ ‫ا‪#$%‬ى‬ ‫ر ا‪-‬ر ا!‬

‫‪7‬‬ ‫أ ذج ا ‪-‬را‪$‬‬ ‫‪8-1‬‬

‫‪37‬‬ ‫ ‪2‬م ‪7 789‬س ا‪5‬داء ا از ‪;< 34‬ل‬

‫‪/;0‬‬ ‫=‬ ‫‪5‬‬

‫‪79‬‬ ‫‪ /$ 9‬‬ ‫‪1‬‬

‫‪80‬‬ ‫‪= / V‬‬ ‫‪2‬‬

‫‪81‬‬ ‫(‪/‬‬ ‫‪3‬‬

5 > ?

:& /"3 / %@ != E /

+$ =$ c 9,

2 / 8"0 / 8,; % %" /"

: #& PC

+$ % , %. / c" 8$ ; 2 '#

Oracle ERP % A = E /1 /,

85 *, ! /1 %.1 %@F

/ 8 Oracle ERP% A

" / /"3 7 , ! % /00

!Oracle ERP% A # %@ 8 /0

8 = /$ + " A %; ,

8 / 8A :& $ !/ /3

./3 . =

%,3 #3 8( 7 - " 8A /A

- - g0 f !/A

. (Ayyagari, 2010) -" 8A

. (Kennerely & Neely, 2001) V 85

. (Kennerely & Neely, 2001) % /A

8" /A ; 2 8 5 * 8 $

#& / 8F" /$ ( ERP ) /A /A 8 *$

, .C@ 85

/ 8" P /A /A1 .(lin; Chen & Hung, 2007

" %0 /$( c

/A /A ; 2 (Tsai et al., 2007 ) i

. 8"

8A " E /" :& 2 !/A /A + % ;

V 5 % ; /A /A j c ! &

80 83 5 ./A 5 /A /A j % 3 ? Q

#A % /A /A ; 8A D$

Kumar & ) /A1 :& %.

" /A /A . & / :#