‘Asample analytical method for bearing resistance calculation 1. Symbow ueedin Annan (1 metatowrg ment ae sed Ard. ATRL pede emsavetanaston wea me ces vauesoneracersfor me nsnaton ct menace, wi Sberise. andy & me erextvetancaton wan 1 neenbeamertaepn © ne cocernity ot ine restart acon wn sects 8 ad. ne carat aos otielead wen sunsrptsconesine, nan q and wage one te unas ng pe mectveteunestonienan epenentin amas entrain tr! ‘pe bean capty ator, wm sites fore, gard, vars cr sucrrge pressure. te lovato ne feuneaton nase ne ces eterave ern preset elev ct teourcaion base ne chape aos ene ranaston base wn sneered ve vertca cas ce aor, me ces etersve welt dens ce sl be etourdaton ee @ areton angie (2) Te manus nis meted ae geen nFguED D2 General (blas/ma operas rears ray Suan Ruane Beusoe maa ore ea ‘petotoue — ne cream are gears, general epreered by Re ee VAUEE TG, € 30S— eccentty and incination of design loads; — tne nape, deptn and incintion of he function: — the Inatincion ofthe grand sutsoe; — gyounc-nater presewes ana nyaraulc grants; — the varaally of te ground, expecially kyering. D3 Undrained conditions (1) Te aaign beseng resistance may be calculaten Tome AAA (sIq RS beg 4) won the ameneloniss factors tor — the ination of te founcton base b,= 1 — 2a (+ 2 — ine snape of te tounaaton: = 14 02 (BIL) fora rectanguar shape, [$= 1.2,for a square or crcutar snape. — the Inciination of the load, caused by a horizontal load At a1 H bogie) we Hee, D4 Drained conditions: (1) Te design bearing etn maybe calodatxtom RA RWC NRL ET NOS 6 +057 BN OSL 2) en cosh vaues of amensontss ror “pea, tan (454 Mein thong Hi=2 {ity tan where > 2 (rough base} — the incinaton of me tounaton ase: (Be y= (TOM, tame) ote (l-eianey —the tape of founaton: HEIL) aie or 3 yo 1 +cin g fora emire w dra shape: = §.=1-0.3 (610) for a rectanguar enape; 5,707, tor a square or ehclar shape5. SMe -1VUN- 1) for rectanguia, square or crease nape — the indinaton of he Ina, caused by 2 horizontal load HE m= mes [2+ (BIL t+ (BIL J when H acts In the drestion of B m= m= [2+ (LUE i + (LB ] ween Hacks In the drecton of 1" Incapes where he orzo ad cernpenent careening anager m= m,=m.cos'e+ mysin’é. wa)Annex H (informative) g values of structural deformation and foundation movement (1) The components of foundation movement, which should be considered include settlement, relative (or differential) settlement, rotation, tlt, relative deflection, relative rotation, horizontal displacement and vibration amplitude. Definitions of some tems for foundation movement and deformation are given in figure H.1 (2) The maximum acceptable relative rotations for open framed structures, infiled frames and load bearing or continuous brick walls are unlikely to be the same but are likely to range from about 1/2000 to about 1/300, to prevent the occurrence of a serviceability limit state in the structure. A maximum relative rotation of 1/500 is acceptable for many structures. The relative rotation likely to cause an ultimate limit state is about 1/150, (3) The ratios given in (2) apply to a sagging mode, as illustrated in figure H1. For a hogging mode (edge settling more than part between), the value should be halved. (A) For normal structures with isolated foundations, total settlements up to 50 mm are often acceptable. Larger settlements may be acceptable provided the relative rotations remain within acceptable limits and provided the total settlements do not cause problems with the services entering the structure, or cause tilting etc. (5) These guidelines concerning limiting settlements apply to normal, routine structures. They should not be applied to buildings or structures, which are out of the ordinary or for which the loading intensity is markedly non-uniform.a) ») ° definitions of settlement s, diferential settlement d, rotation @and angular strain « definitions of relative deflection A and deflection ratio 4/L definitions of tit @and relative rotation (angular distortion) 8 Figure H.1 — Definitions of foundation movement